Codebook for the 1984-1996 panel study of Democratic and Republican Caucus Attenders in Iowa, Michigan, and Virginia. Dataset includes nomination and November waves in 1984, two nomination waves in 1988, a November 1988 wave, November waves in 1992 and 1994, and nomination and November waves in 1996. PIs: Ronald B. Rapoport and Walter J. Stone co-PI: Alan I. Abramowitz (1984-1988) N=2725 *1984A* LIVED4A Q1, years lived in state Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0-5 YEARS 1.00 77 2.8 3.2 3.2 5-10 YEARS 2.00 130 4.8 5.4 8.6 10-20 YEARS 3.00 309 11.3 12.9 21.5 20+ YEARS 4.00 1888 69.3 78.5 100.0 . 321 11.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2404 Missing cases 321 ACTIVE4A Q2, years active in party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0-5 YEARS 1.00 803 29.5 34.2 34.2 5-10 YEARS 2.00 428 15.7 18.2 52.4 10-20 YEARS 3.00 480 17.6 20.4 72.8 20+ YEARS 4.00 638 23.4 27.2 100.0 . 376 13.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2349 Missing cases 376 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONDIS4A Q3, congressional district Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent . 2725 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 2725 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - COUNTY4A Q4, county Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent . 2725 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 2725 COMM4A Q5, member local party committee Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent HAVE HELD POSITION 1.00 1095 40.2 89.6 89.6 NOT HELD 2.00 127 4.7 10.4 100.0 . 1503 55.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1222 Missing cases 1503 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CHAIR4A Q5, chair local party committee Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent HAVE HELD POSITION 1.00 264 9.7 60.3 60.3 NOT HELD 2.00 174 6.4 39.7 100.0 . 2287 83.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 438 Missing cases 2287 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OTHER4A Q5, other local party office Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent HAVE HELD POSITION 1.00 336 12.3 66.8 66.8 NOT HELD 2.00 167 6.1 33.2 100.0 . 2222 81.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 503 Missing cases 2222 LOCOFF4A Q5, elected local office Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent HAVE HELD POSITION 1.00 182 6.7 51.7 51.7 NOT HELD 2.00 170 6.2 48.3 100.0 . 2373 87.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 352 Missing cases 2373 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NATOFF4A Q5, elected state/national office Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent HAVE HELD POSITION 1.00 25 .9 11.9 11.9 NOT HELD 2.00 185 6.8 88.1 100.0 . 2515 92.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 210 Missing cases 2515 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - APPTGO4A Q5, appointed govt office Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent HAVE HELD POSITION 1.00 182 6.7 51.3 51.3 NOT HELD 2.00 173 6.3 48.7 100.0 . 2370 87.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 355 Missing cases 2370 STAFF4A Q5, paid staff Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent HAVE HELD POSITION 1.00 101 3.7 36.2 36.2 NOT HELD 2.00 178 6.5 63.8 100.0 . 2446 89.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 279 Missing cases 2446 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - STDEL4A Q5, state delegate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent HAVE HELD POSITION 1.00 941 34.5 87.6 87.6 NOT HELD 2.00 133 4.9 12.4 100.0 . 1651 60.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1074 Missing cases 1651 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NATDEL4A Q5, national delegate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent HAVE HELD POSITION 1.00 84 3.1 31.5 31.5 NOT HELD 2.00 183 6.7 68.5 100.0 . 2458 90.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 267 Missing cases 2458 VOTE804A Q6, How vote in 1980 presidential race? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent REAGAN 1.00 998 36.6 42.1 42.1 CARTER 2.00 1125 41.3 47.5 89.7 ANDERSON 3.00 173 6.3 7.3 97.0 DID NOT VOTE 4.00 72 2.6 3.0 100.0 . 357 13.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2368 Missing cases 357 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOM80D4A Q7, Dem prefered for 1980 nomination Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CARTER 1.00 775 28.4 54.9 54.9 KENNEDY 2.00 475 17.4 33.6 88.5 OTHER 3.00 162 5.9 11.5 100.0 . 1313 48.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1412 Missing cases 1313 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOM80R4A Q7, Rep prefered for 1980 nomination Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent REAGAN 1.00 686 25.2 65.3 65.3 BUSH 2.00 229 8.4 21.8 87.1 ANDERSON 3.00 83 3.0 7.9 95.0 OTHER 4.00 52 1.9 5.0 100.0 . 1675 61.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1050 Missing cases 1675 PTYID4A Q8, describe your party affiliation Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONG DEMOCRAT 1.00 815 29.9 34.1 34.1 WEAK DEMOCRAT 2.00 308 11.3 12.9 46.9 INDEPENDENT DEM 3.00 262 9.6 11.0 57.9 INDEPENDENT 4.00 63 2.3 2.6 60.5 INDEPENDENT REP 5.00 84 3.1 3.5 64.0 WEAK REPUBLICAN 6.00 162 5.9 6.8 70.8 STRONG REPUBLICAN 7.00 698 25.6 29.2 100.0 . 333 12.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2392 Missing cases 333 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CHAR4A Q9, characterize yourself: Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CONSISTENTLY INVOL 1.00 1165 42.8 52.5 52.5 WORTHWHILE INVOL 2.00 1052 38.6 47.5 100.0 . 508 18.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2217 Missing cases 508 LIBCON4A Q10, describe your political philosophy Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1.00 106 3.9 4.6 4.6 LIBERAL 2.00 484 17.8 21.0 25.6 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3.00 314 11.5 13.6 39.2 M-O-R 4.00 377 13.8 16.3 55.5 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5.00 360 13.2 15.6 71.1 CONSERVATIVE 6.00 564 20.7 24.4 95.5 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7.00 104 3.8 4.5 100.0 . 416 15.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2309 Missing cases 416 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CMPRES4A Q11, active for president campaign Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY ACTIVE 1.00 515 18.9 22.5 22.5 FAIRLY ACTIVE 2.00 878 32.2 38.3 60.8 NOT ACTIVE 3.00 897 32.9 39.2 100.0 . 435 16.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2290 Missing cases 435 CMSEN4A Q11, active for senate campaign Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY ACTIVE 1.00 437 16.0 19.6 19.6 FAIRLY ACTIVE 2.00 859 31.5 38.5 58.1 NOT ACTIVE 3.00 933 34.2 41.9 100.0 . 496 18.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2229 Missing cases 496 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CMCONG4A Q11, active for congress Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY ACTIVE 1.00 524 19.2 23.7 23.7 FAIRLY ACTIVE 2.00 823 30.2 37.2 60.8 NOT ACTIVE 3.00 867 31.8 39.2 100.0 . 511 18.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2214 Missing cases 511 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CMLEG4A Q11, active for state legisl Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY ACTIVE 1.00 541 19.9 24.7 24.7 FAIRLY ACTIVE 2.00 739 27.1 33.8 58.5 NOT ACTIVE 3.00 907 33.3 41.5 100.0 . 538 19.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2187 Missing cases 538 CMGOV4A Q11, active for governor Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY ACTIVE 1.00 571 21.0 25.7 25.7 FAIRLY ACTIVE 2.00 754 27.7 33.9 59.5 NOT ACTIVE 3.00 901 33.1 40.5 100.0 . 499 18.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2226 Missing cases 499 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CMOTH4A Q11, active for other state office Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY ACTIVE 1.00 329 12.1 15.8 15.8 FAIRLY ACTIVE 2.00 687 25.2 32.9 48.7 NOT ACTIVE 3.00 1070 39.3 51.3 100.0 . 639 23.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2086 Missing cases 639 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CMLOC4A Q11, active for local office Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY ACTIVE 1.00 687 25.2 30.6 30.6 FAIRLY ACTIVE 2.00 762 28.0 34.0 64.6 NOT ACTIVE 3.00 794 29.1 35.4 100.0 . 482 17.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2243 Missing cases 482 HELPPP4A Q12, help political party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY 1.00 1292 47.4 58.5 58.5 SOMEWHAT 2.00 649 23.8 29.4 87.9 NOT VERY 3.00 144 5.3 6.5 94.4 NOT AT ALL 4.00 124 4.6 5.6 100.0 . 516 18.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2209 Missing cases 516 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FRIEND4A Q12, asked by friend Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY 1.00 215 7.9 11.8 11.8 SOMEWHAT 2.00 243 8.9 13.3 25.1 NOT VERY 3.00 155 5.7 8.5 33.6 NOT AT ALL 4.00 1213 44.5 66.4 100.0 . 899 33.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1826 Missing cases 899 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MEMBER4A Q12, asked by member organization Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY 1.00 190 7.0 10.3 10.3 SOMEWHAT 2.00 151 5.5 8.2 18.5 NOT VERY 3.00 90 3.3 4.9 23.4 NOT AT ALL 4.00 1408 51.7 76.6 100.0 . 886 32.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 886 ELDEL4A Q12, to be elected as delegate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY 1.00 301 11.0 16.1 16.1 SOMEWHAT 2.00 239 8.8 12.8 28.9 NOT VERY 3.00 164 6.0 8.8 37.7 NOT AT ALL 4.00 1162 42.6 62.3 100.0 . 859 31.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1866 Missing cases 859 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CAND4A Q12, support presidential candidate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY 1.00 1232 45.2 60.6 60.6 SOMEWHAT 2.00 412 15.1 20.3 80.9 NOT VERY 3.00 126 4.6 6.2 87.1 NOT AT ALL 4.00 263 9.7 12.9 100.0 . 692 25.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2033 Missing cases 692 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ISS4A Q12, because of issues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY 1.00 1224 44.9 59.6 59.6 SOMEWHAT 2.00 543 19.9 26.4 86.0 NOT VERY 3.00 156 5.7 7.6 93.6 NOT AT ALL 4.00 131 4.8 6.4 100.0 . 671 24.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2054 Missing cases 671 EXCITE4A Q12, excitement of campaign Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY 1.00 249 9.1 13.4 13.4 SOMEWHAT 2.00 582 21.4 31.3 44.7 NOT VERY 3.00 368 13.5 19.8 64.6 NOT AT ALL 4.00 658 24.1 35.4 100.0 . 868 31.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1857 Missing cases 868 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CAREER4A Q12, to help political career Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY 1.00 88 3.2 4.9 4.9 SOMEWHAT 2.00 151 5.5 8.4 13.3 NOT VERY 3.00 131 4.8 7.3 20.5 NOT AT ALL 4.00 1433 52.6 79.5 100.0 . 922 33.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1803 Missing cases 922 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MEET4A Q12, to meet other people Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY 1.00 307 11.3 15.9 15.9 SOMEWHAT 2.00 650 23.9 33.6 49.5 NOT VERY 3.00 325 11.9 16.8 66.3 NOT AT ALL 4.00 653 24.0 33.7 100.0 . 790 29.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1935 Missing cases 790 MIREAS4A Q12a, most important issue in Q12: Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PARTY 1.00 833 30.6 35.8 35.8 FRIEND 2.00 141 5.2 6.1 41.8 ORGANIZATION 3.00 42 1.5 1.8 43.6 BE ELECTED 4.00 65 2.4 2.8 46.4 SUPPORT CAND 5.00 599 22.0 25.7 72.1 ISSUES 6.00 511 18.8 21.9 94.0 EXCITEMENT 7.00 56 2.1 2.4 96.4 HELP CAREER 8.00 37 1.4 1.6 98.0 MEET PEOPLE 9.00 46 1.7 2.0 100.0 . 395 14.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2330 Missing cases 395 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ISSIMP4A Q13, party more issue concerned Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY AGREE 1.00 911 33.4 42.1 42.1 MILDLY AGREE 2.00 734 26.9 34.0 76.1 MILDLY DISAGREE 4.00 342 12.6 15.8 91.9 STRONGLY DISAGREE 5.00 175 6.4 8.1 100.0 . 407 14.9 Missing NOT SURE 3.00 156 5.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2162 Missing cases 563 PLTFRM4A Q13, party avoid controversial issues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY AGREE 1.00 170 6.2 8.0 8.0 MILDLY AGREE 2.00 339 12.4 16.0 24.0 MILDLY DISAGREE 4.00 617 22.6 29.1 53.1 STRONGLY DISAGREE 5.00 993 36.4 46.9 100.0 . 438 16.1 Missing NOT SURE 3.00 168 6.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2119 Missing cases 606 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LOSE4A Q13, rather see party lose Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY AGREE 1.00 423 15.5 22.3 22.3 MILDLY AGREE 2.00 520 19.1 27.4 49.7 MILDLY DISAGREE 4.00 575 21.1 30.3 79.9 STRONGLY DISAGREE 5.00 381 14.0 20.1 100.0 . 442 16.2 Missing NOT SURE 3.00 384 14.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1899 Missing cases 826 STAND4A Q13, candidate take clear stands Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY AGREE 1.00 887 32.6 42.8 42.8 MILDLY AGREE 2.00 680 25.0 32.8 75.6 MILDLY DISAGREE 4.00 347 12.7 16.7 92.4 STRONGLY DISAGREE 5.00 158 5.8 7.6 100.0 . 425 15.6 Missing NOT SURE 3.00 228 8.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2072 Missing cases 653 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BROAD4A Q13, broad electoral support Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY AGREE 1.00 142 5.2 7.0 7.0 MILDLY AGREE 2.00 338 12.4 16.7 23.8 MILDLY DISAGREE 4.00 592 21.7 29.3 53.1 STRONGLY DISAGREE 5.00 948 34.8 46.9 100.0 . 451 16.6 Missing NOT SURE 3.00 254 9.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2020 Missing cases 705 ERA4A Q14, equal rights amendment Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1.00 816 29.9 36.2 36.2 FAVOR 2.00 411 15.1 18.3 54.5 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3.00 224 8.2 9.9 64.4 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5.00 120 4.4 5.3 69.8 OPPOSE 6.00 304 11.2 13.5 83.3 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7.00 377 13.8 16.7 100.0 . 350 12.8 Missing NOT SURE 4.00 123 4.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2252 Missing cases 473 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FREEZE4A Q14, nuclear weapons freeze Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1.00 612 22.5 28.8 28.8 FAVOR 2.00 347 12.7 16.3 45.1 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3.00 192 7.0 9.0 54.2 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5.00 137 5.0 6.4 60.6 OPPOSE 6.00 330 12.1 15.5 76.1 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7.00 507 18.6 23.9 100.0 . 394 14.5 Missing NOT SURE 4.00 206 7.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2125 Missing cases 600 ABORT4A Q14, amendment against abortions Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1.00 498 18.3 22.7 22.7 FAVOR 2.00 256 9.4 11.7 34.4 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3.00 108 4.0 4.9 39.3 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5.00 119 4.4 5.4 44.7 OPPOSE 6.00 394 14.5 18.0 62.7 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7.00 819 30.1 37.3 100.0 . 367 13.5 Missing NOT SURE 4.00 164 6.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2194 Missing cases 531 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MIDEAS4A Q14, strong military presence Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1.00 257 9.4 12.7 12.7 FAVOR 2.00 452 16.6 22.4 35.1 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3.00 365 13.4 18.1 53.2 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5.00 249 9.1 12.3 65.5 OPPOSE 6.00 419 15.4 20.7 86.2 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7.00 278 10.2 13.8 100.0 . 387 14.2 Missing NOT SURE 4.00 318 11.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2020 Missing cases 705 DEFSP4A Q14, increase defense spending Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1.00 212 7.8 9.6 9.6 FAVOR 2.00 261 9.6 11.8 21.3 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3.00 248 9.1 11.2 32.5 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5.00 247 9.1 11.1 43.7 OPPOSE 6.00 475 17.4 21.4 65.1 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7.00 773 28.4 34.9 100.0 . 365 13.4 Missing NOT SURE 4.00 144 5.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2216 Missing cases 509 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AFFACT4A Q14, affirmative action programs Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1.00 307 11.3 15.0 15.0 FAVOR 2.00 453 16.6 22.1 37.1 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3.00 412 15.1 20.1 57.2 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5.00 279 10.2 13.6 70.8 OPPOSE 6.00 340 12.5 16.6 87.5 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7.00 257 9.4 12.5 100.0 . 398 14.6 Missing NOT SURE 4.00 279 10.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2048 Missing cases 677 BALBUD4A Q14, balanced budget amendment Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1.00 543 19.9 26.9 26.9 FAVOR 2.00 525 19.3 26.0 52.9 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3.00 279 10.2 13.8 66.8 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5.00 146 5.4 7.2 74.0 OPPOSE 6.00 268 9.8 13.3 87.3 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7.00 256 9.4 12.7 100.0 . 380 13.9 Missing NOT SURE 4.00 328 12.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2017 Missing cases 708 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CENTAM4A Q14, military aid to Central Amer Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1.00 161 5.9 8.2 8.2 FAVOR 2.00 283 10.4 14.3 22.5 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3.00 302 11.1 15.3 37.8 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5.00 232 8.5 11.7 49.5 OPPOSE 6.00 445 16.3 22.5 72.1 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7.00 552 20.3 27.9 100.0 . 431 15.8 Missing NOT SURE 4.00 319 11.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1975 Missing cases 750 INFLAT4A Q14, hold down inflation Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1.00 193 7.1 9.9 9.9 FAVOR 2.00 439 16.1 22.4 32.3 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3.00 413 15.2 21.1 53.4 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5.00 326 12.0 16.6 70.0 OPPOSE 6.00 368 13.5 18.8 88.8 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7.00 219 8.0 11.2 100.0 . 403 14.8 Missing NOT SURE 4.00 364 13.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1958 Missing cases 767 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NHI4A Q14, national health insurance Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1.00 420 15.4 20.8 20.8 FAVOR 2.00 389 14.3 19.3 40.1 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3.00 281 10.3 13.9 54.0 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5.00 135 5.0 6.7 60.7 OPPOSE 6.00 356 13.1 17.6 78.3 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7.00 437 16.0 21.7 100.0 . 376 13.8 Missing NOT SURE 4.00 331 12.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2018 Missing cases 707 PUBWKS4A Q14, public works programs Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1.00 234 8.6 11.5 11.5 FAVOR 2.00 407 14.9 20.0 31.5 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3.00 475 17.4 23.3 54.8 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5.00 250 9.2 12.3 67.1 OPPOSE 6.00 394 14.5 19.4 86.4 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7.00 276 10.1 13.6 100.0 . 370 13.6 Missing NOT SURE 4.00 319 11.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2036 Missing cases 689 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - POLLUT4A Q14, increased pollution regulation Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1.00 614 22.5 28.1 28.1 FAVOR 2.00 589 21.6 26.9 55.0 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3.00 395 14.5 18.1 73.1 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5.00 186 6.8 8.5 81.6 OPPOSE 6.00 240 8.8 11.0 92.5 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7.00 163 6.0 7.5 100.0 . 367 13.5 Missing NOT SURE 4.00 171 6.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2187 Missing cases 538 LCHB4A Q15, Howard Baker Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1.00 12 .4 .6 .6 LIBERAL 2.00 74 2.7 3.9 4.5 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3.00 142 5.2 7.4 11.9 M-O-R 4.00 447 16.4 23.3 35.2 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5.00 558 20.5 29.1 64.2 CONSERVATIVE 6.00 615 22.6 32.0 96.3 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7.00 72 2.6 3.8 100.0 . 805 29.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1920 Missing cases 805 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCGB4A Q15, George Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1.00 15 .6 .7 .7 LIBERAL 2.00 69 2.5 3.4 4.1 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3.00 135 5.0 6.6 10.7 M-O-R 4.00 374 13.7 18.3 29.0 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5.00 535 19.6 26.1 55.1 CONSERVATIVE 6.00 768 28.2 37.5 92.6 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7.00 152 5.6 7.4 100.0 . 677 24.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2048 Missing cases 677 LCRR4A Q15, Ronald Reagan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1.00 37 1.4 1.7 1.7 LIBERAL 2.00 42 1.5 1.9 3.7 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3.00 27 1.0 1.3 4.9 M-O-R 4.00 97 3.6 4.5 9.4 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5.00 157 5.8 7.3 16.7 CONSERVATIVE 6.00 935 34.3 43.3 60.0 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7.00 864 31.7 40.0 100.0 . 566 20.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2159 Missing cases 566 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCJA4A Q15, John Anderson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1.00 153 5.6 9.0 9.0 LIBERAL 2.00 519 19.0 30.5 39.5 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3.00 367 13.5 21.6 61.0 M-O-R 4.00 357 13.1 21.0 82.0 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5.00 152 5.6 8.9 90.9 CONSERVATIVE 6.00 104 3.8 6.1 97.0 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7.00 51 1.9 3.0 100.0 . 1022 37.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1703 Missing cases 1022 LCRA4A Q15, Reuben Askew Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1.00 30 1.1 2.4 2.4 LIBERAL 2.00 196 7.2 15.6 18.0 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3.00 305 11.2 24.2 42.2 M-O-R 4.00 314 11.5 25.0 67.2 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5.00 216 7.9 17.2 84.3 CONSERVATIVE 6.00 152 5.6 12.1 96.4 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7.00 45 1.7 3.6 100.0 . 1467 53.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1258 Missing cases 1467 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCAC4A Q15, Alan Cranston Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1.00 448 16.4 26.9 26.9 LIBERAL 2.00 666 24.4 40.0 66.9 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3.00 261 9.6 15.7 82.6 M-O-R 4.00 143 5.2 8.6 91.2 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5.00 66 2.4 4.0 95.2 CONSERVATIVE 6.00 58 2.1 3.5 98.7 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7.00 22 .8 1.3 100.0 . 1061 38.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1664 Missing cases 1061 LCJG4A Q15, John Glenn Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1.00 30 1.1 1.5 1.5 LIBERAL 2.00 252 9.2 12.7 14.2 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3.00 406 14.9 20.4 34.6 M-O-R 4.00 668 24.5 33.6 68.1 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5.00 361 13.2 18.1 86.2 CONSERVATIVE 6.00 244 9.0 12.3 98.5 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7.00 30 1.1 1.5 100.0 . 734 26.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1991 Missing cases 734 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCGH4A Q15, Gary Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1.00 272 10.0 13.5 13.5 LIBERAL 2.00 836 30.7 41.5 55.0 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3.00 529 19.4 26.3 81.3 M-O-R 4.00 227 8.3 11.3 92.6 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5.00 91 3.3 4.5 97.1 CONSERVATIVE 6.00 50 1.8 2.5 99.6 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7.00 8 .3 .4 100.0 . 712 26.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2013 Missing cases 712 LCEH4A Q15, Ernest Hollings Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1.00 46 1.7 3.5 3.5 LIBERAL 2.00 212 7.8 16.4 19.9 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3.00 313 11.5 24.2 44.1 M-O-R 4.00 348 12.8 26.9 70.9 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5.00 226 8.3 17.4 88.3 CONSERVATIVE 6.00 129 4.7 10.0 98.3 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7.00 22 .8 1.7 100.0 . 1429 52.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1296 Missing cases 1429 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCJJ4A Q15, Jesse Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1.00 1016 37.3 50.4 50.4 LIBERAL 2.00 727 26.7 36.1 86.5 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3.00 147 5.4 7.3 93.8 M-O-R 4.00 76 2.8 3.8 97.6 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5.00 22 .8 1.1 98.7 CONSERVATIVE 6.00 19 .7 .9 99.6 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7.00 8 .3 .4 100.0 . 710 26.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2015 Missing cases 710 LCGM4A Q15, George McGovern Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1.00 894 32.8 44.1 44.1 LIBERAL 2.00 754 27.7 37.2 81.3 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3.00 171 6.3 8.4 89.7 M-O-R 4.00 109 4.0 5.4 95.1 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5.00 47 1.7 2.3 97.4 CONSERVATIVE 6.00 37 1.4 1.8 99.3 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7.00 15 .6 .7 100.0 . 698 25.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2027 Missing cases 698 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCWM4A Q15, Walter Mondale Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1.00 513 18.8 24.0 24.0 LIBERAL 2.00 942 34.6 44.1 68.1 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3.00 402 14.8 18.8 87.0 M-O-R 4.00 196 7.2 9.2 96.2 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5.00 46 1.7 2.2 98.3 CONSERVATIVE 6.00 32 1.2 1.5 99.8 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7.00 4 .1 .2 100.0 . 590 21.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2135 Missing cases 590 LCDP4A Q15, Democratic Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1.00 404 14.8 18.3 18.3 LIBERAL 2.00 1036 38.0 47.0 65.3 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3.00 516 18.9 23.4 88.7 M-O-R 4.00 172 6.3 7.8 96.6 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5.00 34 1.2 1.5 98.1 CONSERVATIVE 6.00 34 1.2 1.5 99.6 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7.00 8 .3 .4 100.0 . 521 19.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2204 Missing cases 521 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCRP4A Q15, Republican Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1.00 22 .8 1.0 1.0 LIBERAL 2.00 41 1.5 1.9 2.9 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3.00 54 2.0 2.5 5.4 M-O-R 4.00 151 5.5 7.0 12.4 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5.00 464 17.0 21.4 33.8 CONSERVATIVE 6.00 1085 39.8 50.1 83.8 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7.00 350 12.8 16.2 100.0 . 558 20.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2167 Missing cases 558 LCAA4A Q15, average American voter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1.00 13 .5 .6 .6 LIBERAL 2.00 77 2.8 3.6 4.3 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3.00 308 11.3 14.6 18.8 M-O-R 4.00 855 31.4 40.4 59.2 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5.00 672 24.7 31.8 91.0 CONSERVATIVE 6.00 183 6.7 8.6 99.6 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7.00 8 .3 .4 100.0 . 609 22.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2116 Missing cases 609 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCST4A Q15, average voter in state Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1.00 8 .3 .4 .4 LIBERAL 2.00 82 3.0 3.8 4.2 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3.00 266 9.8 12.3 16.5 M-O-R 4.00 391 14.3 18.1 34.6 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5.00 688 25.2 31.9 66.4 CONSERVATIVE 6.00 646 23.7 29.9 96.3 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7.00 79 2.9 3.7 100.0 . 565 20.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2160 Missing cases 565 FRZRR4A Q16, Ronald Reagan freeze Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVORS 1.00 86 3.2 4.1 4.1 FAVORS 2.00 103 3.8 4.9 8.9 SLIGHTLY FAVORS 3.00 69 2.5 3.3 12.2 SLIGHTLY OPPOSES 5.00 87 3.2 4.1 16.3 OPPOSES 6.00 514 18.9 24.3 40.6 STRONGLY OPPOSES 7.00 1256 46.1 59.4 100.0 . 474 17.4 Missing NOT SURE 4.00 136 5.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2115 Missing cases 610 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FRZWM4A Q16, Walter Mondale freeze Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVORS 1.00 345 12.7 18.6 18.6 FAVORS 2.00 703 25.8 38.0 56.6 SLIGHTLY FAVORS 3.00 386 14.2 20.8 77.4 SLIGHTLY OPPOSES 5.00 167 6.1 9.0 86.4 OPPOSES 6.00 189 6.9 10.2 96.7 STRONGLY OPPOSES 7.00 62 2.3 3.3 100.0 . 514 18.9 Missing NOT SURE 4.00 359 13.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1852 Missing cases 873 FRZJG4A Q16, John Glenn freeze Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVORS 1.00 80 2.9 5.3 5.3 FAVORS 2.00 322 11.8 21.3 26.5 SLIGHTLY FAVORS 3.00 295 10.8 19.5 46.0 SLIGHTLY OPPOSES 5.00 301 11.0 19.9 65.9 OPPOSES 6.00 402 14.8 26.5 92.4 STRONGLY OPPOSES 7.00 115 4.2 7.6 100.0 . 561 20.6 Missing NOT SURE 4.00 649 23.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1515 Missing cases 1210 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FRZJJ4A Q16, Jesse Jackson freeze Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVORS 1.00 782 28.7 45.6 45.6 FAVORS 2.00 610 22.4 35.6 81.2 SLIGHTLY FAVORS 3.00 166 6.1 9.7 90.9 SLIGHTLY OPPOSES 5.00 40 1.5 2.3 93.2 OPPOSES 6.00 63 2.3 3.7 96.9 STRONGLY OPPOSES 7.00 53 1.9 3.1 100.0 . 553 20.3 Missing NOT SURE 4.00 458 16.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1714 Missing cases 1011 FRZGH4A Q16, Gary Hart freeze Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVORS 1.00 416 15.3 24.1 24.1 FAVORS 2.00 679 24.9 39.3 63.4 SLIGHTLY FAVORS 3.00 359 13.2 20.8 84.2 SLIGHTLY OPPOSES 5.00 116 4.3 6.7 90.9 OPPOSES 6.00 119 4.4 6.9 97.8 STRONGLY OPPOSES 7.00 38 1.4 2.2 100.0 . 535 19.6 Missing NOT SURE 4.00 463 17.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1727 Missing cases 998 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FRZGM4A Q16, George McGovern freeze Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVORS 1.00 808 29.7 47.4 47.4 FAVORS 2.00 584 21.4 34.3 81.6 SLIGHTLY FAVORS 3.00 177 6.5 10.4 92.0 SLIGHTLY OPPOSES 5.00 51 1.9 3.0 95.0 OPPOSES 6.00 45 1.7 2.6 97.7 STRONGLY OPPOSES 7.00 40 1.5 2.3 100.0 . 564 20.7 Missing NOT SURE 4.00 456 16.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1705 Missing cases 1020 FRZAC4A Q16, Alan Cranston freeze Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVORS 1.00 785 28.8 53.4 53.4 FAVORS 2.00 416 15.3 28.3 81.8 SLIGHTLY FAVORS 3.00 128 4.7 8.7 90.5 SLIGHTLY OPPOSES 5.00 46 1.7 3.1 93.6 OPPOSES 6.00 34 1.2 2.3 95.9 STRONGLY OPPOSES 7.00 60 2.2 4.1 100.0 . 571 21.0 Missing NOT SURE 4.00 685 25.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1469 Missing cases 1256 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEFSRR4A Q16, Ronald Reagan defense Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVORS 1.00 1539 56.5 69.0 69.0 FAVORS 2.00 539 19.8 24.2 93.2 SLIGHTLY FAVORS 3.00 105 3.9 4.7 97.9 SLIGHTLY OPPOSES 5.00 8 .3 .4 98.3 OPPOSES 6.00 13 .5 .6 98.8 STRONGLY OPPOSES 7.00 26 1.0 1.2 100.0 . 443 16.3 Missing NOT SURE 4.00 52 1.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2230 Missing cases 495 DEFSWM4A Q16, Walter Mondale defense Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVORS 1.00 35 1.3 1.7 1.7 FAVORS 2.00 55 2.0 2.7 4.4 SLIGHTLY FAVORS 3.00 174 6.4 8.6 13.0 SLIGHTLY OPPOSES 5.00 384 14.1 18.9 32.0 OPPOSES 6.00 876 32.1 43.2 75.2 STRONGLY OPPOSES 7.00 503 18.5 24.8 100.0 . 483 17.7 Missing NOT SURE 4.00 215 7.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2027 Missing cases 698 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEFSJG4A Q16, John Glenn defense Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVORS 1.00 32 1.2 2.1 2.1 FAVORS 2.00 210 7.7 13.5 15.6 SLIGHTLY FAVORS 3.00 431 15.8 27.8 43.3 SLIGHTLY OPPOSES 5.00 460 16.9 29.6 73.0 OPPOSES 6.00 330 12.1 21.2 94.2 STRONGLY OPPOSES 7.00 90 3.3 5.8 100.0 . 567 20.8 Missing NOT SURE 4.00 605 22.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1553 Missing cases 1172 DEFSJJ4A Q16, Jesse Jackson defense Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVORS 1.00 34 1.2 1.8 1.8 FAVORS 2.00 16 .6 .9 2.7 SLIGHTLY FAVORS 3.00 41 1.5 2.2 4.8 SLIGHTLY OPPOSES 5.00 121 4.4 6.4 11.3 OPPOSES 6.00 542 19.9 28.9 40.1 STRONGLY OPPOSES 7.00 1124 41.2 59.9 100.0 . 519 19.0 Missing NOT SURE 4.00 328 12.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 847 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEFSGH4A Q16, Gary Hart defense Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVORS 1.00 16 .6 .9 .9 FAVORS 2.00 52 1.9 2.9 3.8 SLIGHTLY FAVORS 3.00 115 4.2 6.5 10.3 SLIGHTLY OPPOSES 5.00 407 14.9 22.8 33.1 OPPOSES 6.00 757 27.8 42.5 75.6 STRONGLY OPPOSES 7.00 435 16.0 24.4 100.0 . 553 20.3 Missing NOT SURE 4.00 390 14.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1782 Missing cases 943 DEFSGM4A Q16, George McGovern defense Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVORS 1.00 24 .9 1.4 1.4 FAVORS 2.00 18 .7 1.0 2.4 SLIGHTLY FAVORS 3.00 41 1.5 2.3 4.7 SLIGHTLY OPPOSES 5.00 142 5.2 8.1 12.8 OPPOSES 6.00 577 21.2 32.7 45.5 STRONGLY OPPOSES 7.00 961 35.3 54.5 100.0 . 548 20.1 Missing NOT SURE 4.00 414 15.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1763 Missing cases 962 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEFSAC4A Q16, Alan Cranston defense Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVORS 1.00 28 1.0 1.9 1.9 FAVORS 2.00 30 1.1 2.0 3.9 SLIGHTLY FAVORS 3.00 31 1.1 2.1 6.0 SLIGHTLY OPPOSES 5.00 133 4.9 9.0 15.1 OPPOSES 6.00 489 17.9 33.2 48.2 STRONGLY OPPOSES 7.00 764 28.0 51.8 100.0 . 573 21.0 Missing NOT SURE 4.00 677 24.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1475 Missing cases 1250 INFRR4A Q16, Ronald Reagan inflation Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVORS 1.00 1137 41.7 53.2 53.2 FAVORS 2.00 688 25.2 32.2 85.3 SLIGHTLY FAVORS 3.00 218 8.0 10.2 95.5 SLIGHTLY OPPOSES 5.00 28 1.0 1.3 96.8 OPPOSES 6.00 40 1.5 1.9 98.7 STRONGLY OPPOSES 7.00 28 1.0 1.3 100.0 . 465 17.1 Missing NOT SURE 4.00 121 4.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2139 Missing cases 586 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INFWM4A Q16, Walter Mondale inflation Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVORS 1.00 28 1.0 1.5 1.5 FAVORS 2.00 65 2.4 3.5 5.0 SLIGHTLY FAVORS 3.00 165 6.1 8.9 13.9 SLIGHTLY OPPOSES 5.00 426 15.6 23.0 36.9 OPPOSES 6.00 768 28.2 41.4 78.2 STRONGLY OPPOSES 7.00 404 14.8 21.8 100.0 . 523 19.2 Missing NOT SURE 4.00 346 12.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1856 Missing cases 869 INFJG4A Q16, John Glenn inflation Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVORS 1.00 18 .7 1.4 1.4 FAVORS 2.00 128 4.7 9.8 11.2 SLIGHTLY FAVORS 3.00 285 10.5 21.9 33.1 SLIGHTLY OPPOSES 5.00 459 16.8 35.3 68.4 OPPOSES 6.00 313 11.5 24.0 92.4 STRONGLY OPPOSES 7.00 99 3.6 7.6 100.0 . 583 21.4 Missing NOT SURE 4.00 840 30.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1302 Missing cases 1423 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INFJJ4A Q16, Jesse Jackson inflation Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVORS 1.00 20 .7 1.1 1.1 FAVORS 2.00 34 1.2 2.0 3.1 SLIGHTLY FAVORS 3.00 44 1.6 2.5 5.6 SLIGHTLY OPPOSES 5.00 160 5.9 9.2 14.8 OPPOSES 6.00 593 21.8 34.0 48.9 STRONGLY OPPOSES 7.00 891 32.7 51.1 100.0 . 552 20.3 Missing NOT SURE 4.00 431 15.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1742 Missing cases 983 INFGH4A Q16, Gary Hart inflation Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVORS 1.00 16 .6 1.0 1.0 FAVORS 2.00 50 1.8 3.1 4.0 SLIGHTLY FAVORS 3.00 135 5.0 8.2 12.3 SLIGHTLY OPPOSES 5.00 451 16.6 27.6 39.8 OPPOSES 6.00 688 25.2 42.0 81.9 STRONGLY OPPOSES 7.00 297 10.9 18.1 100.0 . 559 20.5 Missing NOT SURE 4.00 529 19.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1637 Missing cases 1088 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INFGM4A Q16, George McGovern inflation Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVORS 1.00 13 .5 .8 .8 FAVORS 2.00 32 1.2 2.0 2.9 SLIGHTLY FAVORS 3.00 54 2.0 3.4 6.3 SLIGHTLY OPPOSES 5.00 213 7.8 13.5 19.8 OPPOSES 6.00 613 22.5 38.9 58.7 STRONGLY OPPOSES 7.00 652 23.9 41.3 100.0 . 585 21.5 Missing NOT SURE 4.00 563 20.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1577 Missing cases 1148 INFAC4A Q16, Alan Cranston inflation Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVORS 1.00 18 .7 1.4 1.4 FAVORS 2.00 23 .8 1.8 3.2 SLIGHTLY FAVORS 3.00 55 2.0 4.3 7.4 SLIGHTLY OPPOSES 5.00 202 7.4 15.6 23.0 OPPOSES 6.00 499 18.3 38.6 61.6 STRONGLY OPPOSES 7.00 497 18.2 38.4 100.0 . 583 21.4 Missing NOT SURE 4.00 848 31.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1294 Missing cases 1431 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABRTRR4A Q16, Ronald Reagan abortion Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVORS 1.00 1144 42.0 58.1 58.1 FAVORS 2.00 553 20.3 28.1 86.1 SLIGHTLY FAVORS 3.00 123 4.5 6.2 92.4 SLIGHTLY OPPOSES 5.00 33 1.2 1.7 94.1 OPPOSES 6.00 63 2.3 3.2 97.3 STRONGLY OPPOSES 7.00 54 2.0 2.7 100.0 . 472 17.3 Missing NOT SURE 4.00 283 10.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1970 Missing cases 755 ABRTWM4A Q16, Walter Mondale abortion Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVORS 1.00 64 2.3 4.2 4.2 FAVORS 2.00 123 4.5 8.1 12.3 SLIGHTLY FAVORS 3.00 117 4.3 7.7 19.9 SLIGHTLY OPPOSES 5.00 240 8.8 15.7 35.6 OPPOSES 6.00 619 22.7 40.6 76.2 STRONGLY OPPOSES 7.00 363 13.3 23.8 100.0 . 528 19.4 Missing NOT SURE 4.00 671 24.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1526 Missing cases 1199 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABRTJG4A Q16, John Glenn abortion Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVORS 1.00 44 1.6 4.3 4.3 FAVORS 2.00 149 5.5 14.7 19.1 SLIGHTLY FAVORS 3.00 184 6.8 18.2 37.2 SLIGHTLY OPPOSES 5.00 234 8.6 23.1 60.3 OPPOSES 6.00 284 10.4 28.0 88.4 STRONGLY OPPOSES 7.00 118 4.3 11.6 100.0 . 576 21.1 Missing NOT SURE 4.00 1136 41.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1013 Missing cases 1712 ABRTJJ4A Q16, Jesse Jackson abortion Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVORS 1.00 77 2.8 5.9 5.9 FAVORS 2.00 99 3.6 7.6 13.5 SLIGHTLY FAVORS 3.00 88 3.2 6.7 20.2 SLIGHTLY OPPOSES 5.00 126 4.6 9.6 29.9 OPPOSES 6.00 463 17.0 35.5 65.3 STRONGLY OPPOSES 7.00 453 16.6 34.7 100.0 . 561 20.6 Missing NOT SURE 4.00 858 31.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1306 Missing cases 1419 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABRTGH4A Q16, Gary Hart abortion Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVORS 1.00 34 1.2 2.6 2.6 FAVORS 2.00 98 3.6 7.5 10.0 SLIGHTLY FAVORS 3.00 91 3.3 6.9 17.0 SLIGHTLY OPPOSES 5.00 242 8.9 18.4 35.4 OPPOSES 6.00 528 19.4 40.2 75.6 STRONGLY OPPOSES 7.00 321 11.8 24.4 100.0 . 551 20.2 Missing NOT SURE 4.00 860 31.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1314 Missing cases 1411 ABRTGM4A Q16, George McGovern abortion Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVORS 1.00 33 1.2 2.6 2.6 FAVORS 2.00 80 2.9 6.3 8.8 SLIGHTLY FAVORS 3.00 62 2.3 4.9 13.7 SLIGHTLY OPPOSES 5.00 129 4.7 10.1 23.8 OPPOSES 6.00 513 18.8 40.1 63.9 STRONGLY OPPOSES 7.00 461 16.9 36.1 100.0 . 575 21.1 Missing NOT SURE 4.00 872 32.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1278 Missing cases 1447 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABRTAC4A Q16, Alan Cranston abortion Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVORS 1.00 36 1.3 3.4 3.4 FAVORS 2.00 71 2.6 6.6 10.0 SLIGHTLY FAVORS 3.00 54 2.0 5.1 15.1 SLIGHTLY OPPOSES 5.00 129 4.7 12.1 27.1 OPPOSES 6.00 404 14.8 37.8 64.9 STRONGLY OPPOSES 7.00 375 13.8 35.1 100.0 . 576 21.1 Missing NOT SURE 4.00 1080 39.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1069 Missing cases 1656 LEADRR4A Q17, Ronald Reagan leadership Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1.00 637 23.4 27.4 27.4 ABOVE AVERAGE 2.00 706 25.9 30.3 57.7 AVERAGE 3.00 368 13.5 15.8 73.5 BELOW AVERAGE 4.00 183 6.7 7.9 81.3 POOR 5.00 435 16.0 18.7 100.0 . 372 13.7 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 24 .9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2329 Missing cases 396 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LEADGB4A Q17, George Bush leadership Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1.00 165 6.1 7.7 7.7 ABOVE AVERAGE 2.00 660 24.2 30.9 38.7 AVERAGE 3.00 826 30.3 38.7 77.4 BELOW AVERAGE 4.00 267 9.8 12.5 89.9 POOR 5.00 216 7.9 10.1 100.0 . 440 16.1 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 151 5.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2134 Missing cases 591 LEADWM4A Q17, Walter Mondale leadership Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1.00 185 6.8 8.2 8.2 ABOVE AVERAGE 2.00 639 23.4 28.3 36.5 AVERAGE 3.00 881 32.3 39.0 75.5 BELOW AVERAGE 4.00 338 12.4 15.0 90.5 POOR 5.00 215 7.9 9.5 100.0 . 406 14.9 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 61 2.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2258 Missing cases 467 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LEADJG4A Q17, John Glenn leadership Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1.00 31 1.1 1.5 1.5 ABOVE AVERAGE 2.00 298 10.9 14.4 15.9 AVERAGE 3.00 905 33.2 43.7 59.6 BELOW AVERAGE 4.00 588 21.6 28.4 88.1 POOR 5.00 247 9.1 11.9 100.0 . 493 18.1 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 163 6.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2069 Missing cases 656 LEADJJ4A Q17, Jesse Jackson leadership Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1.00 262 9.6 12.1 12.1 ABOVE AVERAGE 2.00 723 26.5 33.5 45.6 AVERAGE 3.00 493 18.1 22.8 68.5 BELOW AVERAGE 4.00 311 11.4 14.4 82.9 POOR 5.00 369 13.5 17.1 100.0 . 437 16.0 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 130 4.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2158 Missing cases 567 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LEADGH4A Q17, Gary Hart leadership Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1.00 116 4.3 5.4 5.4 ABOVE AVERAGE 2.00 744 27.3 34.9 40.4 AVERAGE 3.00 856 31.4 40.2 80.6 BELOW AVERAGE 4.00 274 10.1 12.9 93.4 POOR 5.00 140 5.1 6.6 100.0 . 461 16.9 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 134 4.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2130 Missing cases 595 LEADGM4A Q17, George McGovern leadership Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1.00 80 2.9 3.8 3.8 ABOVE AVERAGE 2.00 418 15.3 20.0 23.8 AVERAGE 3.00 721 26.5 34.4 58.2 BELOW AVERAGE 4.00 500 18.3 23.9 82.1 POOR 5.00 374 13.7 17.9 100.0 . 476 17.5 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 156 5.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2093 Missing cases 632 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LEADAC4A Q17, Alan Cranston leadership Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1.00 25 .9 1.4 1.4 ABOVE AVERAGE 2.00 209 7.7 11.8 13.2 AVERAGE 3.00 615 22.6 34.7 47.9 BELOW AVERAGE 4.00 485 17.8 27.3 75.2 POOR 5.00 440 16.1 24.8 100.0 . 504 18.5 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 447 16.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1774 Missing cases 951 ISSRR4A Q17, Ronald Reagan issues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1.00 306 11.2 13.4 13.4 ABOVE AVERAGE 2.00 506 18.6 22.1 35.5 AVERAGE 3.00 468 17.2 20.4 55.9 BELOW AVERAGE 4.00 280 10.3 12.2 68.2 POOR 5.00 729 26.8 31.8 100.0 . 383 14.1 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 53 1.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2289 Missing cases 436 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ISSGB4A Q17, George Bush issues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1.00 273 10.0 13.1 13.1 ABOVE AVERAGE 2.00 724 26.6 34.7 47.8 AVERAGE 3.00 724 26.6 34.7 82.5 BELOW AVERAGE 4.00 214 7.9 10.3 92.7 POOR 5.00 152 5.6 7.3 100.0 . 458 16.8 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 180 6.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2087 Missing cases 638 ISSWM4A Q17, Walter Mondale issues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1.00 241 8.8 10.8 10.8 ABOVE AVERAGE 2.00 836 30.7 37.6 48.4 AVERAGE 3.00 827 30.3 37.2 85.7 BELOW AVERAGE 4.00 202 7.4 9.1 94.7 POOR 5.00 117 4.3 5.3 100.0 . 415 15.2 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 87 3.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2223 Missing cases 502 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ISSJG4A Q17, John Glenn issues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1.00 61 2.2 3.0 3.0 ABOVE AVERAGE 2.00 496 18.2 24.6 27.6 AVERAGE 3.00 1047 38.4 51.9 79.5 BELOW AVERAGE 4.00 310 11.4 15.4 94.9 POOR 5.00 103 3.8 5.1 100.0 . 500 18.3 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 208 7.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2017 Missing cases 708 ISSJJ4A Q17, Jesse Jackson issues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1.00 135 5.0 6.4 6.4 ABOVE AVERAGE 2.00 425 15.6 20.0 26.4 AVERAGE 3.00 696 25.5 32.8 59.1 BELOW AVERAGE 4.00 456 16.7 21.5 80.6 POOR 5.00 413 15.2 19.4 100.0 . 447 16.4 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 153 5.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2125 Missing cases 600 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ISSGH4A Q17, Gary Hart issues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1.00 161 5.9 7.7 7.7 ABOVE AVERAGE 2.00 734 26.9 35.2 42.9 AVERAGE 3.00 817 30.0 39.2 82.1 BELOW AVERAGE 4.00 239 8.8 11.5 93.6 POOR 5.00 134 4.9 6.4 100.0 . 482 17.7 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 158 5.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2085 Missing cases 640 ISSGM4A Q17, George McGovern issues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1.00 218 8.0 10.6 10.6 ABOVE AVERAGE 2.00 648 23.8 31.4 41.9 AVERAGE 3.00 664 24.4 32.2 74.1 BELOW AVERAGE 4.00 299 11.0 14.5 88.6 POOR 5.00 236 8.7 11.4 100.0 . 472 17.3 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 188 6.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2065 Missing cases 660 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ISSAC4A Q17, Alan Cranston issues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1.00 109 4.0 6.3 6.3 ABOVE AVERAGE 2.00 431 15.8 24.8 31.1 AVERAGE 3.00 673 24.7 38.8 69.9 BELOW AVERAGE 4.00 270 9.9 15.6 85.5 POOR 5.00 252 9.2 14.5 100.0 . 506 18.6 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 484 17.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1735 Missing cases 990 EXRR4A Q17, Ronald Reagan experience Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1.00 522 19.2 22.7 22.7 ABOVE AVERAGE 2.00 756 27.7 32.8 55.5 AVERAGE 3.00 532 19.5 23.1 78.6 BELOW AVERAGE 4.00 206 7.6 8.9 87.5 POOR 5.00 287 10.5 12.5 100.0 . 392 14.4 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 30 1.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2303 Missing cases 422 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EXGB4A Q17, George Bush experience Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1.00 333 12.2 15.2 15.2 ABOVE AVERAGE 2.00 838 30.8 38.2 53.3 AVERAGE 3.00 732 26.9 33.3 86.7 BELOW AVERAGE 4.00 186 6.8 8.5 95.2 POOR 5.00 106 3.9 4.8 100.0 . 450 16.5 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 80 2.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2195 Missing cases 530 EXWM4A Q17, Walter Mondale experience Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1.00 372 13.7 16.4 16.4 ABOVE AVERAGE 2.00 1087 39.9 47.9 64.3 AVERAGE 3.00 658 24.1 29.0 93.3 BELOW AVERAGE 4.00 98 3.6 4.3 97.6 POOR 5.00 55 2.0 2.4 100.0 . 417 15.3 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 38 1.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2270 Missing cases 455 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EXJG4A Q17, John Glenn experience Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1.00 45 1.7 2.1 2.1 ABOVE AVERAGE 2.00 380 13.9 17.9 20.1 AVERAGE 3.00 1103 40.5 52.1 72.1 BELOW AVERAGE 4.00 468 17.2 22.1 94.2 POOR 5.00 122 4.5 5.8 100.0 . 490 18.0 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 117 4.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2118 Missing cases 607 EXJJ4A Q17, Jesse Jackson experience Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1.00 42 1.5 1.9 1.9 ABOVE AVERAGE 2.00 203 7.4 9.4 11.3 AVERAGE 3.00 514 18.9 23.7 35.0 BELOW AVERAGE 4.00 781 28.7 36.0 71.0 POOR 5.00 630 23.1 29.0 100.0 . 449 16.5 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 106 3.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2170 Missing cases 555 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EXGH4A Q17, Gary Hart experience Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1.00 55 2.0 2.6 2.6 ABOVE AVERAGE 2.00 458 16.8 21.3 23.8 AVERAGE 3.00 1121 41.1 52.0 75.8 BELOW AVERAGE 4.00 399 14.6 18.5 94.3 POOR 5.00 122 4.5 5.7 100.0 . 476 17.5 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 94 3.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2155 Missing cases 570 EXGM4A Q17, George McGovern experience Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1.00 130 4.8 6.1 6.1 ABOVE AVERAGE 2.00 729 26.8 34.3 40.4 AVERAGE 3.00 813 29.8 38.2 78.6 BELOW AVERAGE 4.00 301 11.0 14.1 92.7 POOR 5.00 155 5.7 7.3 100.0 . 488 17.9 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 109 4.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2128 Missing cases 597 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EXAC4A Q17, Alan Cranston experience Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1.00 59 2.2 3.2 3.2 ABOVE AVERAGE 2.00 407 14.9 22.1 25.3 AVERAGE 3.00 821 30.1 44.5 69.8 BELOW AVERAGE 4.00 354 13.0 19.2 89.0 POOR 5.00 203 7.4 11.0 100.0 . 518 19.0 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 363 13.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1844 Missing cases 881 TVRR4A Q17, Ronald Reagan TV Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1.00 1135 41.7 49.3 49.3 ABOVE AVERAGE 2.00 619 22.7 26.9 76.2 AVERAGE 3.00 213 7.8 9.2 85.4 BELOW AVERAGE 4.00 109 4.0 4.7 90.1 POOR 5.00 227 8.3 9.9 100.0 . 389 14.3 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 33 1.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2303 Missing cases 422 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TVGB4A Q17, George Bush TV Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1.00 165 6.1 7.6 7.6 ABOVE AVERAGE 2.00 609 22.3 28.2 35.8 AVERAGE 3.00 908 33.3 42.0 77.8 BELOW AVERAGE 4.00 308 11.3 14.3 92.1 POOR 5.00 171 6.3 7.9 100.0 . 472 17.3 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 92 3.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2161 Missing cases 564 TVWM4A Q17, Walter Mondale TV Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1.00 136 5.0 6.0 6.0 ABOVE AVERAGE 2.00 566 20.8 24.8 30.8 AVERAGE 3.00 959 35.2 42.1 72.9 BELOW AVERAGE 4.00 402 14.8 17.6 90.5 POOR 5.00 216 7.9 9.5 100.0 . 410 15.0 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 36 1.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2279 Missing cases 446 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TVJG4A Q17, John Glenn TV Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1.00 27 1.0 1.3 1.3 ABOVE AVERAGE 2.00 219 8.0 10.2 11.5 AVERAGE 3.00 834 30.6 38.9 50.4 BELOW AVERAGE 4.00 743 27.3 34.7 85.1 POOR 5.00 320 11.7 14.9 100.0 . 502 18.4 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 80 2.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2143 Missing cases 582 TVJJ4A Q17, Jesse Jackson TV Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1.00 510 18.7 22.9 22.9 ABOVE AVERAGE 2.00 793 29.1 35.6 58.5 AVERAGE 3.00 460 16.9 20.6 79.1 BELOW AVERAGE 4.00 238 8.7 10.7 89.8 POOR 5.00 227 8.3 10.2 100.0 . 445 16.3 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 52 1.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2228 Missing cases 497 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TVGH4A Q17, Gary Hart TV Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1.00 191 7.0 8.7 8.7 ABOVE AVERAGE 2.00 892 32.7 40.5 49.2 AVERAGE 3.00 822 30.2 37.4 86.6 BELOW AVERAGE 4.00 218 8.0 9.9 96.5 POOR 5.00 77 2.8 3.5 100.0 . 475 17.4 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 50 1.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2200 Missing cases 525 TVGM4A Q17, George McGovern TV Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1.00 102 3.7 4.8 4.8 ABOVE AVERAGE 2.00 409 15.0 19.2 24.0 AVERAGE 3.00 849 31.2 39.9 63.9 BELOW AVERAGE 4.00 477 17.5 22.4 86.4 POOR 5.00 290 10.6 13.6 100.0 . 489 17.9 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 109 4.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2127 Missing cases 598 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TVAC4A Q17, Alan Cranston TV Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1.00 18 .7 1.0 1.0 ABOVE AVERAGE 2.00 152 5.6 8.1 9.0 AVERAGE 3.00 663 24.3 35.2 44.3 BELOW AVERAGE 4.00 572 21.0 30.4 74.7 POOR 5.00 477 17.5 25.3 100.0 . 517 19.0 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 326 12.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1882 Missing cases 843 COMPRR4A Q17, Ronald Reagan compassion Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1.00 354 13.0 15.6 15.6 ABOVE AVERAGE 2.00 410 15.0 18.0 33.6 AVERAGE 3.00 403 14.8 17.7 51.3 BELOW AVERAGE 4.00 259 9.5 11.4 62.7 POOR 5.00 848 31.1 37.3 100.0 . 400 14.7 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 51 1.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2274 Missing cases 451 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - COMPGB4A Q17, George Bush compassion Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1.00 187 6.9 9.1 9.1 ABOVE AVERAGE 2.00 480 17.6 23.3 32.4 AVERAGE 3.00 766 28.1 37.2 69.7 BELOW AVERAGE 4.00 341 12.5 16.6 86.2 POOR 5.00 283 10.4 13.8 100.0 . 466 17.1 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 202 7.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2057 Missing cases 668 COMPWM4A Q17, Walter Mondale compassion Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1.00 340 12.5 15.4 15.4 ABOVE AVERAGE 2.00 745 27.3 33.8 49.2 AVERAGE 3.00 839 30.8 38.1 87.3 BELOW AVERAGE 4.00 181 6.6 8.2 95.5 POOR 5.00 99 3.6 4.5 100.0 . 429 15.7 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 92 3.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2204 Missing cases 521 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - COMPJG4A Q17, John Glenn compassion Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1.00 64 2.3 3.2 3.2 ABOVE AVERAGE 2.00 428 15.7 21.3 24.5 AVERAGE 3.00 1120 41.1 55.8 80.4 BELOW AVERAGE 4.00 304 11.2 15.2 95.5 POOR 5.00 90 3.3 4.5 100.0 . 512 18.8 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 207 7.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2006 Missing cases 719 COMPJJ4A Q17, Jesse Jackson compassion Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1.00 546 20.0 25.5 25.5 ABOVE AVERAGE 2.00 745 27.3 34.9 60.4 AVERAGE 3.00 532 19.5 24.9 85.3 BELOW AVERAGE 4.00 165 6.1 7.7 93.0 POOR 5.00 149 5.5 7.0 100.0 . 454 16.7 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 134 4.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2137 Missing cases 588 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - COMPGH4A Q17, Gary Hart compassion Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1.00 151 5.5 7.3 7.3 ABOVE AVERAGE 2.00 626 23.0 30.3 37.7 AVERAGE 3.00 978 35.9 47.4 85.1 BELOW AVERAGE 4.00 230 8.4 11.1 96.2 POOR 5.00 78 2.9 3.8 100.0 . 488 17.9 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 174 6.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2063 Missing cases 662 COMPGM4A Q17, George McGovern compassion Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1.00 419 15.4 20.4 20.4 ABOVE AVERAGE 2.00 665 24.4 32.4 52.8 AVERAGE 3.00 660 24.2 32.1 84.9 BELOW AVERAGE 4.00 189 6.9 9.2 94.1 POOR 5.00 121 4.4 5.9 100.0 . 482 17.7 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 189 6.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2054 Missing cases 671 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - COMPAC4A Q17, Alan Cranston compassion Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1.00 191 7.0 11.0 11.0 ABOVE AVERAGE 2.00 425 15.6 24.5 35.5 AVERAGE 3.00 750 27.5 43.2 78.7 BELOW AVERAGE 4.00 208 7.6 12.0 90.7 POOR 5.00 162 5.9 9.3 100.0 . 513 18.8 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 476 17.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1736 Missing cases 989 EVALRR4A Q17, Ronald Reagan evaluation Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1.00 530 19.4 22.9 22.9 ABOVE AVERAGE 2.00 509 18.7 22.0 44.9 AVERAGE 3.00 352 12.9 15.2 60.1 BELOW AVERAGE 4.00 278 10.2 12.0 72.1 POOR 5.00 645 23.7 27.9 100.0 . 411 15.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2314 Missing cases 411 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALGB4A Q17, George Bush evaluation Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1.00 249 9.1 11.4 11.4 ABOVE AVERAGE 2.00 604 22.2 27.7 39.2 AVERAGE 3.00 739 27.1 33.9 73.1 BELOW AVERAGE 4.00 327 12.0 15.0 88.1 POOR 5.00 258 9.5 11.9 100.0 . 548 20.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2177 Missing cases 548 EVALHB4A Q17, Howard Baker evaluation Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1.00 163 6.0 7.9 7.9 ABOVE AVERAGE 2.00 707 25.9 34.1 41.9 AVERAGE 3.00 863 31.7 41.6 83.5 BELOW AVERAGE 4.00 218 8.0 10.5 94.0 POOR 5.00 124 4.6 6.0 100.0 . 650 23.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2075 Missing cases 650 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALJA4A Q17, John Anderson evaluation Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1.00 46 1.7 2.4 2.4 ABOVE AVERAGE 2.00 333 12.2 17.1 19.5 AVERAGE 3.00 813 29.8 41.9 61.4 BELOW AVERAGE 4.00 464 17.0 23.9 85.3 POOR 5.00 286 10.5 14.7 100.0 . 783 28.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1942 Missing cases 783 EVALRA4A Q17, Reuben Askew evaluation Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1.00 17 .6 1.1 1.1 ABOVE AVERAGE 2.00 111 4.1 7.1 8.2 AVERAGE 3.00 646 23.7 41.4 49.6 BELOW AVERAGE 4.00 521 19.1 33.4 82.9 POOR 5.00 267 9.8 17.1 100.0 . 1163 42.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1562 Missing cases 1163 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALAC4A Q17, Alan Cranston evaluation Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1.00 32 1.2 1.8 1.8 ABOVE AVERAGE 2.00 239 8.8 13.2 15.0 AVERAGE 3.00 663 24.3 36.6 51.6 BELOW AVERAGE 4.00 475 17.4 26.2 77.8 POOR 5.00 401 14.7 22.2 100.0 . 915 33.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1810 Missing cases 915 EVALJG4A Q17, John Glenn evaluation Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1.00 23 .8 1.1 1.1 ABOVE AVERAGE 2.00 269 9.9 12.7 13.8 AVERAGE 3.00 1049 38.5 49.7 63.6 BELOW AVERAGE 4.00 584 21.4 27.7 91.2 POOR 5.00 185 6.8 8.8 100.0 . 615 22.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2110 Missing cases 615 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALGH4A Q17, Gary Hart evaluation Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1.00 121 4.4 5.6 5.6 ABOVE AVERAGE 2.00 745 27.3 34.4 40.0 AVERAGE 3.00 862 31.6 39.9 79.9 BELOW AVERAGE 4.00 288 10.6 13.3 93.2 POOR 5.00 147 5.4 6.8 100.0 . 562 20.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2163 Missing cases 562 EVALEH4A Q17, Ernest Hollings evaluation Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1.00 42 1.5 2.6 2.6 ABOVE AVERAGE 2.00 287 10.5 17.7 20.3 AVERAGE 3.00 676 24.8 41.8 62.2 BELOW AVERAGE 4.00 406 14.9 25.1 87.3 POOR 5.00 206 7.6 12.7 100.0 . 1108 40.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1617 Missing cases 1108 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALJJ4A Q17, Jesse Jackson evaluation Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1.00 142 5.2 6.6 6.6 ABOVE AVERAGE 2.00 529 19.4 24.7 31.3 AVERAGE 3.00 603 22.1 28.1 59.4 BELOW AVERAGE 4.00 432 15.9 20.1 79.6 POOR 5.00 438 16.1 20.4 100.0 . 581 21.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2144 Missing cases 581 EVALGM4A Q17, George McGovern evaluation Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1.00 162 5.9 7.7 7.7 ABOVE AVERAGE 2.00 475 17.4 22.5 30.1 AVERAGE 3.00 691 25.4 32.7 62.8 BELOW AVERAGE 4.00 404 14.8 19.1 82.0 POOR 5.00 381 14.0 18.0 100.0 . 612 22.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2113 Missing cases 612 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALWM4A Q17, Walter Mondale evaluation Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1.00 282 10.3 12.6 12.6 ABOVE AVERAGE 2.00 695 25.5 31.1 43.8 AVERAGE 3.00 735 27.0 32.9 76.7 BELOW AVERAGE 4.00 297 10.9 13.3 90.0 POOR 5.00 223 8.2 10.0 100.0 . 493 18.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2232 Missing cases 493 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - METRR4A Q18, met personally Ronald Reagan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2549 93.5 93.5 93.5 CHECKED 1.00 176 6.5 6.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 METWM4A Q18, met personally Walter Mondale Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2550 93.6 93.6 93.6 CHECKED 1.00 175 6.4 6.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - METJG4A Q18, met personally John Glenn Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2641 96.9 96.9 96.9 CHECKED 1.00 84 3.1 3.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - METJJ4A Q18, met personally Jesse Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2664 97.8 97.8 97.8 CHECKED 1.00 61 2.2 2.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 METGH4A Q18, met personally Gary Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2631 96.6 96.6 96.6 CHECKED 1.00 94 3.4 3.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - METGM4A Q18, met personally George McGovern Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2632 96.6 96.6 96.6 CHECKED 1.00 93 3.4 3.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - METAC4A Q18, met personally Alan Cranston Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2652 97.3 97.3 97.3 CHECKED 1.00 73 2.7 2.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 RALRR4A Q18, rally Ronald Reagan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2352 86.3 86.3 86.3 CHECKED 1.00 373 13.7 13.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RALWM4A Q18, rally Walter Mondale Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2481 91.0 91.0 91.0 CHECKED 1.00 244 9.0 9.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RALJG4A Q18, rally John Glenn Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2602 95.5 95.5 95.5 CHECKED 1.00 123 4.5 4.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 RALJJ4A Q18, rally Jesse Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2594 95.2 95.2 95.2 CHECKED 1.00 131 4.8 4.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RALGH4A Q18, rally Gary Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2601 95.4 95.4 95.4 CHECKED 1.00 124 4.6 4.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RALGM4A Q18, rally George McGovern Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2586 94.9 94.9 94.9 CHECKED 1.00 139 5.1 5.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 RALAC4A Q18, rally Alan Cranston Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2625 96.3 96.3 96.3 CHECKED 1.00 100 3.7 3.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTRR4A Q18, contacted by Ronald Reagan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2230 81.8 81.8 81.8 CHECKED 1.00 495 18.2 18.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTWM4A Q18, contacted by Walter Mondale Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2114 77.6 77.6 77.6 CHECKED 1.00 611 22.4 22.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 CONTJG4A Q18, contacted by John Glenn Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2475 90.8 90.8 90.8 CHECKED 1.00 250 9.2 9.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTJJ4A Q18, contacted by Jesse Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2620 96.1 96.1 96.1 CHECKED 1.00 105 3.9 3.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTGH4A Q18, contacted by Gary Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2348 86.2 86.2 86.2 CHECKED 1.00 377 13.8 13.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 CONTGM4A Q18, contacted by George McGovern Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2547 93.5 93.5 93.5 CHECKED 1.00 178 6.5 6.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTAC4A Q18, contacted by Alan Cranston Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2495 91.6 91.6 91.6 CHECKED 1.00 230 8.4 8.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MAILRR4A Q18, mail Ronald Reagan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 1681 61.7 61.7 61.7 CHECKED 1.00 1044 38.3 38.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 MAILWM4A Q18, mail Walter Mondale Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 1940 71.2 71.2 71.2 CHECKED 1.00 785 28.8 28.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MAILJG4A Q18, mail John Glenn Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2240 82.2 82.2 82.2 CHECKED 1.00 485 17.8 17.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MAILJJ4A Q18, mail Jesse Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2520 92.5 92.5 92.5 CHECKED 1.00 205 7.5 7.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 MAILGH4A Q18, mail Gary Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2127 78.1 78.1 78.1 CHECKED 1.00 598 21.9 21.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MAILGM4A Q18, mail George McGovern Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2366 86.8 86.8 86.8 CHECKED 1.00 359 13.2 13.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MAILAC4A Q18, mail Alan Cranston Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2390 87.7 87.7 87.7 CHECKED 1.00 335 12.3 12.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 ADTVRR4A Q18, heard TV ad Ronald Reagan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 1035 38.0 38.0 38.0 CHECKED 1.00 1690 62.0 62.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ADTVWM4A Q18, heard TV ad Walter Mondale Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 960 35.2 35.2 35.2 CHECKED 1.00 1765 64.8 64.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ADTVJG4A Q18, heard TV ad John Glenn Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 1211 44.4 44.4 44.4 CHECKED 1.00 1514 55.6 55.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 ADTVJJ4A Q18, heard TV ad Jesse Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 1409 51.7 51.7 51.7 CHECKED 1.00 1316 48.3 48.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ADTVGH4A Q18, heard TV ad Gary Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 1035 38.0 38.0 38.0 CHECKED 1.00 1690 62.0 62.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ADTVGM4A Q18, heard TV ad George McGovern Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 1488 54.6 54.6 54.6 CHECKED 1.00 1237 45.4 45.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 ADTVAC4A Q18, heard TV ad Alan Cranston Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 1578 57.9 57.9 57.9 CHECKED 1.00 1147 42.1 42.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - READRR4A Q18, read ad Ronald Reagan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 1442 52.9 52.9 52.9 CHECKED 1.00 1283 47.1 47.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - READWM4A Q18, read ad Walter Mondale Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 1395 51.2 51.2 51.2 CHECKED 1.00 1330 48.8 48.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 READJG4A Q18, read ad John Glenn Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 1653 60.7 60.7 60.7 CHECKED 1.00 1072 39.3 39.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - READJJ4A Q18, read ad Jesse Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 1728 63.4 63.4 63.4 CHECKED 1.00 997 36.6 36.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - READGH4A Q18, read ad Gary Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 1488 54.6 54.6 54.6 CHECKED 1.00 1237 45.4 45.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 READGM4A Q18, read ad George McGovern Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 1778 65.2 65.2 65.2 CHECKED 1.00 947 34.8 34.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - READAC4A Q18, read ad Alan Cranston Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 1868 68.6 68.6 68.6 CHECKED 1.00 857 31.4 31.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 PREF14A Q19, first choice for nomination Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent REAGAN 1.00 821 30.1 35.8 35.8 OTHER REP 2.00 67 2.5 2.9 38.7 ASKEW 11.00 11 .4 .5 39.2 CRANSTON 12.00 24 .9 1.0 40.2 GLENN 13.00 51 1.9 2.2 42.4 HART 14.00 394 14.5 17.2 59.6 HOLLINGS 15.00 13 .5 .6 60.1 JACKSON 16.00 105 3.9 4.6 64.7 MCGOVERN 17.00 66 2.4 2.9 67.6 MONDALE 18.00 685 25.1 29.8 97.4 OTHER DEM 19.00 59 2.2 2.6 100.0 . 424 15.6 Missing DK 98.00 5 .2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2296 Missing cases 429 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PREF24A Q19, second choice for nomination Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent REAGAN 1.00 62 2.3 3.2 3.2 OTHER REP 2.00 542 19.9 28.1 31.3 ASKEW 11.00 10 .4 .5 31.8 CRANSTON 12.00 38 1.4 2.0 33.8 GLENN 13.00 72 2.6 3.7 37.5 HART 14.00 484 17.8 25.1 62.6 HOLLINGS 15.00 26 1.0 1.3 64.0 JACKSON 16.00 145 5.3 7.5 71.5 MCGOVERN 17.00 104 3.8 5.4 76.9 MONDALE 18.00 361 13.2 18.7 95.6 OTHER DEM 19.00 85 3.1 4.4 100.0 . 795 29.2 Missing DK 98.00 1 .0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1929 Missing cases 796 PREF34A Q19, third choice for nomination Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent REAGAN 1.00 38 1.4 2.4 2.4 OTHER REP 2.00 381 14.0 24.5 26.9 ASKEW 11.00 6 .2 .4 27.3 CRANSTON 12.00 66 2.4 4.2 31.6 GLENN 13.00 108 4.0 6.9 38.5 HART 14.00 238 8.7 15.3 53.8 HOLLINGS 15.00 44 1.6 2.8 56.7 JACKSON 16.00 250 9.2 16.1 72.7 MCGOVERN 17.00 149 5.5 9.6 82.3 MONDALE 18.00 191 7.0 12.3 94.6 OTHER DEM 19.00 84 3.1 5.4 100.0 . 1167 42.8 Missing DK 98.00 3 .1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1555 Missing cases 1170 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - REFUSE4A Q19a, no Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 744 27.3 41.8 41.8 CHECKED 1.00 1037 38.1 58.2 100.0 . 944 34.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1781 Missing cases 944 REFUS14A Q19a, yes first line Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent REAGAN 1.00 4 .1 .6 .6 OTHER REP 2.00 11 .4 1.6 2.2 ASKEW 11.00 78 2.9 11.6 13.9 CRANSTON 12.00 62 2.3 9.2 23.1 GLENN 13.00 96 3.5 14.3 37.4 HART 14.00 33 1.2 4.9 42.3 HOLLINGS 15.00 52 1.9 7.7 50.1 JACKSON 16.00 223 8.2 33.2 83.3 MCGOVERN 17.00 2 .1 .3 83.6 MONDALE 18.00 108 4.0 16.1 99.7 OTHER DEM 19.00 2 .1 .3 100.0 . 2052 75.3 Missing DK 98.00 2 .1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 671 Missing cases 2054 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - REFUS24A Q19a, yes second line Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OTHER REP 2.00 8 .3 2.2 2.2 ASKEW 11.00 66 2.4 17.8 20.0 CRANSTON 12.00 64 2.3 17.3 37.3 GLENN 13.00 40 1.5 10.8 48.1 HART 14.00 20 .7 5.4 53.5 HOLLINGS 15.00 75 2.8 20.3 73.8 JACKSON 16.00 69 2.5 18.6 92.4 MCGOVERN 17.00 8 .3 2.2 94.6 MONDALE 18.00 16 .6 4.3 98.9 OTHER DEM 19.00 4 .1 1.1 100.0 . 2354 86.4 Missing DK 98.00 1 .0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 370 Missing cases 2355 REFUS34A Q19a, yes third line Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent REAGAN 1.00 1 .0 .5 .5 OTHER REP 2.00 3 .1 1.5 2.0 ASKEW 11.00 55 2.0 27.1 29.1 CRANSTON 12.00 38 1.4 18.7 47.8 GLENN 13.00 10 .4 4.9 52.7 HART 14.00 15 .6 7.4 60.1 HOLLINGS 15.00 33 1.2 16.3 76.4 JACKSON 16.00 23 .8 11.3 87.7 MCGOVERN 17.00 9 .3 4.4 92.1 MONDALE 18.00 12 .4 5.9 98.0 OTHER DEM 19.00 4 .1 2.0 100.0 . 2522 92.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 203 Missing cases 2522 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RANKJA4A Q19b, rank John Anderson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1.00 50 1.8 2.5 2.5 2.00 192 7.0 9.8 12.3 3.00 261 9.6 13.3 25.6 4.00 280 10.3 14.3 39.9 5.00 305 11.2 15.5 55.4 6.00 356 13.1 18.1 73.5 7.00 362 13.3 18.4 92.0 8.00 158 5.8 8.0 100.0 . 761 27.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1964 Missing cases 761 RANKAC4A Q19b, rank Alan Cranston Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1.00 43 1.6 2.2 2.2 2.00 67 2.5 3.4 5.6 3.00 164 6.0 8.4 14.0 4.00 297 10.9 15.2 29.1 5.00 350 12.8 17.9 47.0 6.00 435 16.0 22.2 69.2 7.00 346 12.7 17.7 86.9 8.00 257 9.4 13.1 100.0 . 766 28.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1959 Missing cases 766 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RANKJG4A Q19b, rank John Glenn Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1.00 61 2.2 3.1 3.1 2.00 436 16.0 22.0 25.0 3.00 329 12.1 16.6 41.6 4.00 268 9.8 13.5 55.1 5.00 298 10.9 15.0 70.1 6.00 258 9.5 13.0 83.1 7.00 261 9.6 13.1 96.3 8.00 74 2.7 3.7 100.0 . 740 27.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1985 Missing cases 740 RANKGH4A Q19b, rank Gary Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1.00 372 13.7 18.2 18.2 2.00 596 21.9 29.2 47.4 3.00 404 14.8 19.8 67.1 4.00 236 8.7 11.5 78.7 5.00 183 6.7 9.0 87.6 6.00 96 3.5 4.7 92.3 7.00 77 2.8 3.8 96.1 8.00 80 2.9 3.9 100.0 . 681 25.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2044 Missing cases 681 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RANKJJ4A Q19b, rank Jesse Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1.00 106 3.9 5.3 5.3 2.00 132 4.8 6.6 11.8 3.00 218 8.0 10.8 22.7 4.00 174 6.4 8.6 31.3 5.00 194 7.1 9.6 41.0 6.00 251 9.2 12.5 53.4 7.00 358 13.1 17.8 71.2 8.00 579 21.2 28.8 100.0 . 713 26.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2012 Missing cases 713 RANKGM4A Q19b, rank George McGovern Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1.00 107 3.9 5.4 5.4 2.00 186 6.8 9.4 14.8 3.00 276 10.1 14.0 28.8 4.00 355 13.0 18.0 46.7 5.00 315 11.6 15.9 62.7 6.00 284 10.4 14.4 77.0 7.00 269 9.9 13.6 90.6 8.00 185 6.8 9.4 100.0 . 748 27.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1977 Missing cases 748 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RANKWM4A Q19b, rank Walter Mondale Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1.00 671 24.6 32.1 32.1 2.00 330 12.1 15.8 47.9 3.00 252 9.2 12.1 60.0 4.00 231 8.5 11.1 71.1 5.00 183 6.7 8.8 79.8 6.00 149 5.5 7.1 87.0 7.00 110 4.0 5.3 92.2 8.00 162 5.9 7.8 100.0 . 637 23.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2088 Missing cases 637 RANKRR4A Q19b, rank Ronald Reagan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1.00 858 31.5 40.4 40.4 2.00 54 2.0 2.5 42.9 3.00 40 1.5 1.9 44.8 4.00 52 1.9 2.4 47.3 5.00 44 1.6 2.1 49.3 6.00 42 1.5 2.0 51.3 7.00 108 4.0 5.1 56.4 8.00 926 34.0 43.6 100.0 . 601 22.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2124 Missing cases 601 NOMRR4A Q20, nomination chances Ronald Reagan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN LOSE .00 19 .7 .9 .9 5.00 1 .0 .0 .9 VERY LIKELY LOSE 10.00 3 .1 .1 1.1 PROBABLY LOSE 25.00 2 .1 .1 1.2 LIKELY LOSE THAN WIN 40.00 8 .3 .4 1.5 45.00 1 .0 .0 1.6 A TOSSUP 50.00 19 .7 .9 2.4 55.00 8 .3 .4 2.8 59.00 1 .0 .0 2.9 LIKELY WIN THAN LOSE 60.00 15 .6 .7 3.5 65.00 2 .1 .1 3.6 70.00 1 .0 .0 3.7 PROBABLY WIN 75.00 34 1.2 1.6 5.3 78.00 1 .0 .0 5.3 80.00 1 .0 .0 5.3 85.00 3 .1 .1 5.5 VERY LIKELY WIN 90.00 101 3.7 4.7 10.1 95.00 17 .6 .8 10.9 98.00 20 .7 .9 11.8 99.00 10 .4 .5 12.3 CERTAIN WIN 100.00 1903 69.8 87.7 100.0 . 367 13.5 Missing 999.00 188 6.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2170 Missing cases 555 NOMAC4A Q20, nomination chances Alan Cranston Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN LOSE .00 279 10.2 69.4 69.4 1.00 1 .0 .2 69.7 5.00 3 .1 .7 70.4 VERY LIKELY LOSE 10.00 61 2.2 15.2 85.6 14.00 1 .0 .2 85.8 15.00 2 .1 .5 86.3 20.00 3 .1 .7 87.1 PROBABLY LOSE 25.00 23 .8 5.7 92.8 30.00 2 .1 .5 93.3 LIKELY LOSE THAN WIN 40.00 20 .7 5.0 98.3 A TOSSUP 50.00 6 .2 1.5 99.8 LIKELY WIN THAN LOSE 60.00 1 .0 .2 100.0 . 367 13.5 Missing 999.00 1956 71.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 402 Missing cases 2323 NOMJG4A Q20, nomination chances John Glenn Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN LOSE .00 251 9.2 62.9 62.9 5.00 3 .1 .8 63.7 8.00 1 .0 .3 63.9 VERY LIKELY LOSE 10.00 57 2.1 14.3 78.2 12.00 1 .0 .3 78.4 20.00 4 .1 1.0 79.4 PROBABLY LOSE 25.00 35 1.3 8.8 88.2 30.00 1 .0 .3 88.5 35.00 2 .1 .5 89.0 LIKELY LOSE THAN WIN 40.00 27 1.0 6.8 95.7 A TOSSUP 50.00 11 .4 2.8 98.5 55.00 1 .0 .3 98.7 LIKELY WIN THAN LOSE 60.00 4 .1 1.0 99.7 VERY LIKELY WIN 90.00 1 .0 .3 100.0 . 367 13.5 Missing 999.00 1959 71.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 399 Missing cases 2326 NOMGH4A Q20, nomination chances Gary Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN LOSE .00 270 9.9 13.1 13.1 1.00 9 .3 .4 13.6 2.00 3 .1 .1 13.7 3.00 1 .0 .0 13.8 4.00 4 .1 .2 14.0 5.00 28 1.0 1.4 15.3 6.00 1 .0 .0 15.4 9.00 3 .1 .1 15.5 VERY LIKELY LOSE 10.00 241 8.8 11.7 27.3 13.00 1 .0 .0 27.3 15.00 18 .7 .9 28.2 20.00 38 1.4 1.9 30.0 21.00 1 .0 .0 30.1 23.00 1 .0 .0 30.1 24.00 1 .0 .0 30.2 PROBABLY LOSE 25.00 222 8.1 10.8 41.0 27.00 1 .0 .0 41.0 28.00 1 .0 .0 41.1 30.00 46 1.7 2.2 43.3 33.00 1 .0 .0 43.4 35.00 20 .7 1.0 44.4 LIKELY LOSE THAN WIN 40.00 494 18.1 24.1 68.4 42.00 1 .0 .0 68.5 44.00 1 .0 .0 68.5 45.00 70 2.6 3.4 71.9 48.00 3 .1 .1 72.1 49.00 3 .1 .1 72.2 A TOSSUP 50.00 322 11.8 15.7 87.9 51.00 1 .0 .0 87.9 53.00 1 .0 .0 88.0 55.00 46 1.7 2.2 90.2 56.00 1 .0 .0 90.3 LIKELY WIN THAN LOSE 60.00 79 2.9 3.8 94.1 65.00 4 .1 .2 94.3 70.00 5 .2 .2 94.5 74.00 1 .0 .0 94.6 PROBABLY WIN 75.00 48 1.8 2.3 96.9 78.00 2 .1 .1 97.0 80.00 7 .3 .3 97.4 85.00 3 .1 .1 97.5 VERY LIKELY WIN 90.00 26 1.0 1.3 98.8 95.00 3 .1 .1 98.9 98.00 13 .5 .6 99.6 CERTAIN WIN 100.00 9 .3 .4 100.0 . 367 13.5 Missing NOMGH4A Q20, nomination chances Gary Hart 999.00 304 11.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2054 Missing cases 671 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOMJJ4A Q20, nomination chances Jesse Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN LOSE .00 930 34.1 46.4 46.4 1.00 19 .7 .9 47.4 2.00 4 .1 .2 47.6 4.00 1 .0 .0 47.6 5.00 52 1.9 2.6 50.2 6.00 1 .0 .0 50.2 VERY LIKELY LOSE 10.00 392 14.4 19.6 69.8 15.00 7 .3 .3 70.2 16.00 1 .0 .0 70.2 20.00 47 1.7 2.3 72.6 21.00 1 .0 .0 72.6 PROBABLY LOSE 25.00 230 8.4 11.5 84.1 30.00 23 .8 1.1 85.2 33.00 2 .1 .1 85.3 35.00 12 .4 .6 85.9 LIKELY LOSE THAN WIN 40.00 184 6.8 9.2 95.1 45.00 8 .3 .4 95.5 46.00 1 .0 .0 95.6 48.00 1 .0 .0 95.6 A TOSSUP 50.00 37 1.4 1.8 97.5 55.00 12 .4 .6 98.1 LIKELY WIN THAN LOSE 60.00 9 .3 .4 98.5 65.00 1 .0 .0 98.6 70.00 1 .0 .0 98.6 PROBABLY WIN 75.00 6 .2 .3 98.9 80.00 2 .1 .1 99.0 VERY LIKELY WIN 90.00 5 .2 .2 99.3 98.00 13 .5 .6 99.9 CERTAIN WIN 100.00 2 .1 .1 100.0 . 367 13.5 Missing 999.00 354 13.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2004 Missing cases 721 NOMGM4A Q20, nomination chances George McGovern Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN LOSE .00 209 7.7 52.0 52.0 1.00 1 .0 .2 52.2 VERY LIKELY LOSE 10.00 66 2.4 16.4 68.7 15.00 3 .1 .7 69.4 20.00 9 .3 2.2 71.6 21.00 1 .0 .2 71.9 PROBABLY LOSE 25.00 47 1.7 11.7 83.6 30.00 4 .1 1.0 84.6 35.00 2 .1 .5 85.1 38.00 1 .0 .2 85.3 LIKELY LOSE THAN WIN 40.00 35 1.3 8.7 94.0 45.00 3 .1 .7 94.8 A TOSSUP 50.00 14 .5 3.5 98.3 LIKELY WIN THAN LOSE 60.00 6 .2 1.5 99.8 85.00 1 .0 .2 100.0 . 367 13.5 Missing 999.00 1956 71.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 402 Missing cases 2323 NOMWM4A Q20, nomination chances Walter Mondale Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN LOSE .00 24 .9 1.1 1.1 5.00 1 .0 .0 1.2 VERY LIKELY LOSE 10.00 6 .2 .3 1.4 15.00 1 .0 .0 1.5 PROBABLY LOSE 25.00 3 .1 .1 1.6 30.00 5 .2 .2 1.8 35.00 1 .0 .0 1.9 LIKELY LOSE THAN WIN 40.00 21 .8 1.0 2.9 45.00 8 .3 .4 3.2 49.00 1 .0 .0 3.3 A TOSSUP 50.00 145 5.3 6.7 10.0 52.00 3 .1 .1 10.1 54.00 1 .0 .0 10.2 55.00 78 2.9 3.6 13.8 LIKELY WIN THAN LOSE 60.00 196 7.2 9.1 22.8 65.00 11 .4 .5 23.3 66.00 1 .0 .0 23.4 70.00 28 1.0 1.3 24.7 73.00 1 .0 .0 24.7 PROBABLY WIN 75.00 318 11.7 14.7 39.4 78.00 1 .0 .0 39.5 80.00 43 1.6 2.0 41.5 85.00 13 .5 .6 42.1 VERY LIKELY WIN 90.00 618 22.7 28.6 70.6 95.00 43 1.6 2.0 72.6 96.00 2 .1 .1 72.7 97.00 2 .1 .1 72.8 98.00 14 .5 .6 73.4 99.00 11 .4 .5 73.9 CERTAIN WIN 100.00 564 20.7 26.1 100.0 . 367 13.5 Missing 999.00 194 7.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2164 Missing cases 561 NOVRR4A Q20, nov election chances Ronald Reagan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN LOSE .00 41 1.5 1.9 1.9 VERY LIKELY LOSE 10.00 12 .4 .6 2.5 11.00 1 .0 .0 2.5 20.00 1 .0 .0 2.5 PROBABLY LOSE 25.00 7 .3 .3 2.9 30.00 6 .2 .3 3.1 LIKELY LOSE THAN WIN 40.00 81 3.0 3.8 6.9 42.00 1 .0 .0 6.9 45.00 27 1.0 1.3 8.2 48.00 3 .1 .1 8.3 49.00 8 .3 .4 8.7 A TOSSUP 50.00 358 13.1 16.6 25.3 51.00 13 .5 .6 25.9 52.00 10 .4 .5 26.4 53.00 1 .0 .0 26.4 55.00 122 4.5 5.7 32.1 56.00 1 .0 .0 32.1 57.00 2 .1 .1 32.2 58.00 2 .1 .1 32.3 LIKELY WIN THAN LOSE 60.00 328 12.0 15.2 47.5 62.00 1 .0 .0 47.5 65.00 16 .6 .7 48.3 70.00 25 .9 1.2 49.4 72.00 2 .1 .1 49.5 73.00 1 .0 .0 49.6 PROBABLY WIN 75.00 316 11.6 14.6 64.2 78.00 1 .0 .0 64.2 80.00 48 1.8 2.2 66.5 85.00 14 .5 .6 67.1 88.00 1 .0 .0 67.2 VERY LIKELY WIN 90.00 350 12.8 16.2 83.4 91.00 1 .0 .0 83.4 95.00 23 .8 1.1 84.5 96.00 1 .0 .0 84.5 98.00 10 .4 .5 85.0 99.00 4 .1 .2 85.2 CERTAIN WIN 100.00 320 11.7 14.8 100.0 . 367 13.5 Missing 999.00 199 7.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2159 Missing cases 566 NOVAC4A Q20, nov election chances Alan Cranston Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN LOSE .00 216 7.9 60.0 60.0 2.00 1 .0 .3 60.3 5.00 1 .0 .3 60.6 VERY LIKELY LOSE 10.00 43 1.6 11.9 72.5 15.00 1 .0 .3 72.8 20.00 4 .1 1.1 73.9 PROBABLY LOSE 25.00 31 1.1 8.6 82.5 30.00 7 .3 1.9 84.4 LIKELY LOSE THAN WIN 40.00 33 1.2 9.2 93.6 A TOSSUP 50.00 13 .5 3.6 97.2 LIKELY WIN THAN LOSE 60.00 5 .2 1.4 98.6 PROBABLY WIN 75.00 2 .1 .6 99.2 VERY LIKELY WIN 90.00 1 .0 .3 99.4 CERTAIN WIN 100.00 2 .1 .6 100.0 . 367 13.5 Missing 999.00 1998 73.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 360 Missing cases 2365 NOVJG4A Q20, nov election chances John Glenn Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN LOSE .00 194 7.1 55.1 55.1 5.00 1 .0 .3 55.4 VERY LIKELY LOSE 10.00 31 1.1 8.8 64.2 15.00 2 .1 .6 64.8 20.00 5 .2 1.4 66.2 PROBABLY LOSE 25.00 27 1.0 7.7 73.9 30.00 7 .3 2.0 75.9 35.00 5 .2 1.4 77.3 LIKELY LOSE THAN WIN 40.00 38 1.4 10.8 88.1 42.00 1 .0 .3 88.4 45.00 2 .1 .6 88.9 A TOSSUP 50.00 23 .8 6.5 95.5 51.00 1 .0 .3 95.7 55.00 2 .1 .6 96.3 LIKELY WIN THAN LOSE 60.00 10 .4 2.8 99.1 PROBABLY WIN 75.00 1 .0 .3 99.4 VERY LIKELY WIN 90.00 1 .0 .3 99.7 CERTAIN WIN 100.00 1 .0 .3 100.0 . 367 13.5 Missing 999.00 2006 73.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 352 Missing cases 2373 NOVGH4A Q20, nov election chances Gary Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN LOSE .00 280 10.3 14.0 14.0 2.00 1 .0 .0 14.0 5.00 9 .3 .4 14.5 VERY LIKELY LOSE 10.00 118 4.3 5.9 20.4 15.00 5 .2 .2 20.6 20.00 21 .8 1.0 21.7 PROBABLY LOSE 25.00 179 6.6 8.9 30.6 30.00 38 1.4 1.9 32.5 33.00 1 .0 .0 32.6 35.00 23 .8 1.1 33.7 38.00 1 .0 .0 33.7 39.00 1 .0 .0 33.8 LIKELY LOSE THAN WIN 40.00 397 14.6 19.8 53.6 42.00 3 .1 .1 53.8 45.00 63 2.3 3.1 56.9 47.00 6 .2 .3 57.2 48.00 8 .3 .4 57.6 49.00 2 .1 .1 57.7 A TOSSUP 50.00 413 15.2 20.6 78.3 51.00 2 .1 .1 78.4 52.00 4 .1 .2 78.6 55.00 84 3.1 4.2 82.8 59.00 1 .0 .0 82.9 LIKELY WIN THAN LOSE 60.00 149 5.5 7.4 90.3 62.00 1 .0 .0 90.4 65.00 10 .4 .5 90.9 66.00 1 .0 .0 90.9 70.00 15 .6 .7 91.7 PROBABLY WIN 75.00 48 1.8 2.4 94.1 80.00 19 .7 .9 95.0 85.00 5 .2 .2 95.3 VERY LIKELY WIN 90.00 53 1.9 2.6 97.9 95.00 3 .1 .1 98.1 98.00 12 .4 .6 98.7 CERTAIN WIN 100.00 27 1.0 1.3 100.0 . 367 13.5 Missing 999.00 355 13.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2003 Missing cases 722 NOVJJ4A Q20, nov election chances Jesse Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN LOSE .00 952 34.9 49.0 49.0 1.00 5 .2 .3 49.3 2.00 3 .1 .2 49.5 5.00 17 .6 .9 50.3 VERY LIKELY LOSE 10.00 333 12.2 17.2 67.5 12.00 1 .0 .1 67.5 13.00 1 .0 .1 67.6 15.00 9 .3 .5 68.1 20.00 42 1.5 2.2 70.2 PROBABLY LOSE 25.00 222 8.1 11.4 81.7 30.00 36 1.3 1.9 83.5 35.00 14 .5 .7 84.2 37.00 1 .0 .1 84.3 LIKELY LOSE THAN WIN 40.00 174 6.4 9.0 93.3 44.00 1 .0 .1 93.3 45.00 9 .3 .5 93.8 46.00 1 .0 .1 93.8 A TOSSUP 50.00 52 1.9 2.7 96.5 55.00 12 .4 .6 97.1 LIKELY WIN THAN LOSE 60.00 23 .8 1.2 98.3 70.00 2 .1 .1 98.4 PROBABLY WIN 75.00 1 .0 .1 98.5 80.00 1 .0 .1 98.5 VERY LIKELY WIN 90.00 10 .4 .5 99.0 98.00 13 .5 .7 99.7 CERTAIN WIN 100.00 6 .2 .3 100.0 . 367 13.5 Missing 999.00 417 15.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1941 Missing cases 784 NOVGM4A Q20, nov election chances George McGover Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN LOSE .00 173 6.3 47.9 47.9 VERY LIKELY LOSE 10.00 43 1.6 11.9 59.8 15.00 1 .0 .3 60.1 19.00 1 .0 .3 60.4 20.00 5 .2 1.4 61.8 PROBABLY LOSE 25.00 37 1.4 10.2 72.0 30.00 6 .2 1.7 73.7 35.00 1 .0 .3 74.0 LIKELY LOSE THAN WIN 40.00 45 1.7 12.5 86.4 45.00 1 .0 .3 86.7 A TOSSUP 50.00 25 .9 6.9 93.6 55.00 3 .1 .8 94.5 LIKELY WIN THAN LOSE 60.00 9 .3 2.5 97.0 70.00 1 .0 .3 97.2 PROBABLY WIN 75.00 4 .1 1.1 98.3 85.00 1 .0 .3 98.6 VERY LIKELY WIN 90.00 2 .1 .6 99.2 99.00 1 .0 .3 99.4 CERTAIN WIN 100.00 2 .1 .6 100.0 . 367 13.5 Missing 999.00 1997 73.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 361 Missing cases 2364 NOVWM4A Q20, nov election chances Walter Mondale Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN LOSE .00 113 4.1 5.2 5.2 1.00 4 .1 .2 5.4 5.00 10 .4 .5 5.9 6.00 1 .0 .0 5.9 VERY LIKELY LOSE 10.00 130 4.8 6.0 12.0 11.00 1 .0 .0 12.0 15.00 5 .2 .2 12.2 16.00 1 .0 .0 12.3 20.00 22 .8 1.0 13.3 PROBABLY LOSE 25.00 175 6.4 8.1 21.4 27.00 1 .0 .0 21.5 28.00 1 .0 .0 21.5 30.00 26 1.0 1.2 22.7 35.00 15 .6 .7 23.4 LIKELY LOSE THAN WIN 40.00 496 18.2 23.0 46.4 41.00 1 .0 .0 46.4 42.00 1 .0 .0 46.5 43.00 2 .1 .1 46.6 44.00 2 .1 .1 46.7 45.00 106 3.9 4.9 51.6 46.00 1 .0 .0 51.6 47.00 2 .1 .1 51.7 48.00 10 .4 .5 52.2 49.00 12 .4 .6 52.7 A TOSSUP 50.00 453 16.6 21.0 73.7 51.00 3 .1 .1 73.9 52.00 4 .1 .2 74.1 53.00 1 .0 .0 74.1 55.00 86 3.2 4.0 78.1 59.00 1 .0 .0 78.1 LIKELY WIN THAN LOSE 60.00 125 4.6 5.8 83.9 65.00 7 .3 .3 84.2 70.00 11 .4 .5 84.8 PROBABLY WIN 75.00 91 3.3 4.2 89.0 80.00 9 .3 .4 89.4 85.00 5 .2 .2 89.6 VERY LIKELY WIN 90.00 111 4.1 5.1 94.8 95.00 4 .1 .2 94.9 98.00 7 .3 .3 95.3 CERTAIN WIN 100.00 102 3.7 4.7 100.0 . 367 13.5 Missing 999.00 200 7.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2158 Missing cases 567 WSTRR4A Q20, carrying state chances Ronald Reaga Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN LOSE .00 40 1.5 1.9 1.9 2.00 1 .0 .0 1.9 5.00 2 .1 .1 2.0 VERY LIKELY LOSE 10.00 22 .8 1.0 3.1 20.00 3 .1 .1 3.2 PROBABLY LOSE 25.00 32 1.2 1.5 4.7 30.00 11 .4 .5 5.2 35.00 4 .1 .2 5.4 39.00 1 .0 .0 5.5 LIKELY LOSE THAN WIN 40.00 105 3.9 4.9 10.4 43.00 1 .0 .0 10.5 45.00 27 1.0 1.3 11.7 48.00 5 .2 .2 12.0 49.00 3 .1 .1 12.1 A TOSSUP 50.00 304 11.2 14.3 26.4 51.00 7 .3 .3 26.7 52.00 12 .4 .6 27.3 53.00 1 .0 .0 27.4 55.00 111 4.1 5.2 32.6 56.00 1 .0 .0 32.6 57.00 1 .0 .0 32.7 59.00 2 .1 .1 32.8 LIKELY WIN THAN LOSE 60.00 290 10.6 13.7 46.4 65.00 26 1.0 1.2 47.6 70.00 28 1.0 1.3 49.0 PROBABLY WIN 75.00 274 10.1 12.9 61.9 80.00 58 2.1 2.7 64.6 85.00 20 .7 .9 65.5 VERY LIKELY WIN 90.00 338 12.4 15.9 81.5 95.00 19 .7 .9 82.3 98.00 11 .4 .5 82.9 99.00 4 .1 .2 83.1 CERTAIN WIN 100.00 360 13.2 16.9 100.0 . 367 13.5 Missing 999.00 234 8.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2124 Missing cases 601 WSTAC4A Q20, carrying state chances Alan Cransto Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN LOSE .00 223 8.2 62.6 62.6 2.00 2 .1 .6 63.2 5.00 5 .2 1.4 64.6 VERY LIKELY LOSE 10.00 44 1.6 12.4 77.0 15.00 3 .1 .8 77.8 20.00 2 .1 .6 78.4 PROBABLY LOSE 25.00 27 1.0 7.6 86.0 30.00 6 .2 1.7 87.6 LIKELY LOSE THAN WIN 40.00 22 .8 6.2 93.8 45.00 1 .0 .3 94.1 A TOSSUP 50.00 16 .6 4.5 98.6 55.00 2 .1 .6 99.2 LIKELY WIN THAN LOSE 60.00 3 .1 .8 100.0 . 367 13.5 Missing 999.00 2002 73.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 356 Missing cases 2369 WSTJG4A Q20, carrying state chances John Glenn Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN LOSE .00 193 7.1 55.6 55.6 5.00 3 .1 .9 56.5 VERY LIKELY LOSE 10.00 38 1.4 11.0 67.4 15.00 3 .1 .9 68.3 20.00 8 .3 2.3 70.6 PROBABLY LOSE 25.00 27 1.0 7.8 78.4 30.00 6 .2 1.7 80.1 35.00 2 .1 .6 80.7 39.00 1 .0 .3 81.0 LIKELY LOSE THAN WIN 40.00 28 1.0 8.1 89.0 45.00 3 .1 .9 89.9 A TOSSUP 50.00 19 .7 5.5 95.4 55.00 2 .1 .6 96.0 LIKELY WIN THAN LOSE 60.00 11 .4 3.2 99.1 70.00 1 .0 .3 99.4 PROBABLY WIN 75.00 1 .0 .3 99.7 80.00 1 .0 .3 100.0 . 367 13.5 Missing 999.00 2011 73.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 347 Missing cases 2378 WSTGH4A Q20, carrying state chances Gary Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN LOSE .00 324 11.9 16.4 16.4 1.00 1 .0 .1 16.4 5.00 12 .4 .6 17.1 VERY LIKELY LOSE 10.00 166 6.1 8.4 25.5 15.00 7 .3 .4 25.8 20.00 21 .8 1.1 26.9 PROBABLY LOSE 25.00 197 7.2 10.0 36.8 28.00 1 .0 .1 36.9 30.00 45 1.7 2.3 39.2 35.00 13 .5 .7 39.8 37.00 1 .0 .1 39.9 38.00 1 .0 .1 39.9 LIKELY LOSE THAN WIN 40.00 395 14.5 20.0 59.9 44.00 1 .0 .1 60.0 45.00 62 2.3 3.1 63.1 46.00 1 .0 .1 63.2 47.00 3 .1 .2 63.3 48.00 5 .2 .3 63.6 49.00 3 .1 .2 63.7 A TOSSUP 50.00 366 13.4 18.5 82.2 51.00 3 .1 .2 82.4 52.00 3 .1 .2 82.5 53.00 1 .0 .1 82.6 55.00 56 2.1 2.8 85.4 59.00 1 .0 .1 85.5 LIKELY WIN THAN LOSE 60.00 133 4.9 6.7 92.2 65.00 7 .3 .4 92.6 70.00 18 .7 .9 93.5 PROBABLY WIN 75.00 48 1.8 2.4 95.9 80.00 10 .4 .5 96.4 85.00 3 .1 .2 96.6 VERY LIKELY WIN 90.00 34 1.2 1.7 98.3 92.00 1 .0 .1 98.3 95.00 2 .1 .1 98.4 98.00 13 .5 .7 99.1 CERTAIN WIN 100.00 18 .7 .9 100.0 . 367 13.5 Missing 999.00 382 14.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1976 Missing cases 749 WSTJJ4A Q20, carrying state chances Jesse Jackso Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN LOSE .00 938 34.4 48.8 48.8 1.00 7 .3 .4 49.2 2.00 2 .1 .1 49.3 3.00 1 .0 .1 49.3 5.00 25 .9 1.3 50.7 VERY LIKELY LOSE 10.00 324 11.9 16.9 67.5 12.00 3 .1 .2 67.7 15.00 10 .4 .5 68.2 20.00 51 1.9 2.7 70.8 22.00 1 .0 .1 70.9 PROBABLY LOSE 25.00 212 7.8 11.0 81.9 28.00 2 .1 .1 82.0 30.00 35 1.3 1.8 83.9 35.00 10 .4 .5 84.4 38.00 1 .0 .1 84.4 LIKELY LOSE THAN WIN 40.00 136 5.0 7.1 91.5 45.00 12 .4 .6 92.1 46.00 1 .0 .1 92.2 48.00 1 .0 .1 92.2 A TOSSUP 50.00 63 2.3 3.3 95.5 55.00 11 .4 .6 96.1 LIKELY WIN THAN LOSE 60.00 21 .8 1.1 97.2 65.00 4 .1 .2 97.4 69.00 1 .0 .1 97.4 70.00 2 .1 .1 97.6 PROBABLY WIN 75.00 15 .6 .8 98.3 80.00 1 .0 .1 98.4 VERY LIKELY WIN 90.00 11 .4 .6 99.0 98.00 11 .4 .6 99.5 CERTAIN WIN 100.00 9 .3 .5 100.0 . 367 13.5 Missing 999.00 437 16.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1921 Missing cases 804 WSTGM4A Q20, carrying state chances George McGov Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN LOSE .00 166 6.1 46.9 46.9 9.00 1 .0 .3 47.2 VERY LIKELY LOSE 10.00 52 1.9 14.7 61.9 15.00 3 .1 .8 62.7 20.00 5 .2 1.4 64.1 PROBABLY LOSE 25.00 35 1.3 9.9 74.0 30.00 7 .3 2.0 76.0 35.00 2 .1 .6 76.6 LIKELY LOSE THAN WIN 40.00 37 1.4 10.5 87.0 45.00 3 .1 .8 87.9 A TOSSUP 50.00 27 1.0 7.6 95.5 55.00 2 .1 .6 96.0 LIKELY WIN THAN LOSE 60.00 5 .2 1.4 97.5 PROBABLY WIN 75.00 4 .1 1.1 98.6 80.00 2 .1 .6 99.2 VERY LIKELY WIN 90.00 3 .1 .8 100.0 . 367 13.5 Missing 999.00 2004 73.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 354 Missing cases 2371 WSTWM4A Q20, carrying state chances Walter Monda Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN LOSE .00 152 5.6 7.1 7.1 1.00 1 .0 .0 7.2 2.00 1 .0 .0 7.2 5.00 9 .3 .4 7.6 7.00 1 .0 .0 7.7 8.00 1 .0 .0 7.7 VERY LIKELY LOSE 10.00 159 5.8 7.4 15.2 15.00 6 .2 .3 15.5 20.00 27 1.0 1.3 16.7 PROBABLY LOSE 25.00 172 6.3 8.1 24.8 30.00 27 1.0 1.3 26.0 35.00 17 .6 .8 26.8 LIKELY LOSE THAN WIN 40.00 417 15.3 19.5 46.4 43.00 1 .0 .0 46.4 44.00 1 .0 .0 46.5 45.00 63 2.3 3.0 49.4 46.00 2 .1 .1 49.5 47.00 2 .1 .1 49.6 48.00 15 .6 .7 50.3 49.00 4 .1 .2 50.5 A TOSSUP 50.00 442 16.2 20.7 71.2 51.00 5 .2 .2 71.4 52.00 1 .0 .0 71.5 54.00 1 .0 .0 71.5 55.00 69 2.5 3.2 74.8 58.00 2 .1 .1 74.8 LIKELY WIN THAN LOSE 60.00 167 6.1 7.8 82.7 65.00 11 .4 .5 83.2 70.00 17 .6 .8 84.0 PROBABLY WIN 75.00 118 4.3 5.5 89.5 80.00 12 .4 .6 90.1 85.00 4 .1 .2 90.3 VERY LIKELY WIN 90.00 103 3.8 4.8 95.1 95.00 3 .1 .1 95.2 98.00 8 .3 .4 95.6 CERTAIN WIN 100.00 94 3.4 4.4 100.0 . 367 13.5 Missing 999.00 223 8.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2135 Missing cases 590 TEACH4A Q21, teacher's organization Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NEVER MEMBER 1.00 1938 71.1 79.8 79.8 MEMBER ONLY 2.00 254 9.3 10.5 90.2 ACTIVE MEMBER 3.00 237 8.7 9.8 100.0 . 296 10.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2429 Missing cases 296 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BUSORG4A Q21, business organization Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NEVER MEMBER 1.00 1971 72.3 81.1 81.1 MEMBER ONLY 2.00 266 9.8 11.0 92.1 ACTIVE MEMBER 3.00 192 7.0 7.9 100.0 . 296 10.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2429 Missing cases 296 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PROORG4A Q21, professional organization Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NEVER MEMBER 1.00 1769 64.9 72.8 72.8 MEMBER ONLY 2.00 365 13.4 15.0 87.9 ACTIVE MEMBER 3.00 295 10.8 12.1 100.0 . 296 10.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2429 Missing cases 296 COMSER4A Q21, community service club Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NEVER MEMBER 1.00 1617 59.3 66.6 66.6 MEMBER ONLY 2.00 304 11.2 12.5 79.1 ACTIVE MEMBER 3.00 508 18.6 20.9 100.0 . 296 10.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2429 Missing cases 296 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - VETER4A Q21, veterans' group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NEVER MEMBER 1.00 1951 71.6 80.3 80.3 MEMBER ONLY 2.00 295 10.8 12.1 92.5 ACTIVE MEMBER 3.00 183 6.7 7.5 100.0 . 296 10.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2429 Missing cases 296 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WOMEN4A Q21, women's rights group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NEVER MEMBER 1.00 2238 82.1 92.1 92.1 MEMBER ONLY 2.00 118 4.3 4.9 97.0 ACTIVE MEMBER 3.00 73 2.7 3.0 100.0 . 296 10.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2429 Missing cases 296 CIVILR4A Q21, civil rights group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NEVER MEMBER 1.00 2205 80.9 90.8 90.8 MEMBER ONLY 2.00 148 5.4 6.1 96.9 ACTIVE MEMBER 3.00 76 2.8 3.1 100.0 . 296 10.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2429 Missing cases 296 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ENVIR4A Q21, environmental group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NEVER MEMBER 1.00 2110 77.4 86.9 86.9 MEMBER ONLY 2.00 251 9.2 10.3 97.2 ACTIVE MEMBER 3.00 68 2.5 2.8 100.0 . 296 10.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2429 Missing cases 296 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NONPRT4A Q21, non-partisan interest group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NEVER MEMBER 1.00 1991 73.1 82.0 82.0 MEMBER ONLY 2.00 288 10.6 11.9 93.8 ACTIVE MEMBER 3.00 150 5.5 6.2 100.0 . 296 10.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2429 Missing cases 296 LABOR4A Q21, labor union Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NEVER MEMBER 1.00 1907 70.0 78.5 78.5 MEMBER ONLY 2.00 335 12.3 13.8 92.3 ACTIVE MEMBER 3.00 187 6.9 7.7 100.0 . 296 10.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2429 Missing cases 296 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FARM4A Q21, farm organization Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NEVER MEMBER 1.00 2050 75.2 84.4 84.4 MEMBER ONLY 2.00 225 8.3 9.3 93.7 ACTIVE MEMBER 3.00 154 5.7 6.3 100.0 . 296 10.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2429 Missing cases 296 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVANG4A Q21, political evangelical grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NEVER MEMBER 1.00 2309 84.7 95.1 95.1 MEMBER ONLY 2.00 89 3.3 3.7 98.7 ACTIVE MEMBER 3.00 31 1.1 1.3 100.0 . 296 10.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2429 Missing cases 296 ANTIAB4A Q21, anti-abortion group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NEVER MEMBER 1.00 2258 82.9 93.0 93.0 MEMBER ONLY 2.00 108 4.0 4.4 97.4 ACTIVE MEMBER 3.00 63 2.3 2.6 100.0 . 296 10.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2429 Missing cases 296 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IDGRP4A Q21, ideological group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NEVER MEMBER 1.00 2304 84.6 94.9 94.9 MEMBER ONLY 2.00 86 3.2 3.5 98.4 ACTIVE MEMBER 3.00 39 1.4 1.6 100.0 . 296 10.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2429 Missing cases 296 PTYM4A Q22, PID mother Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACTIVE DEM 1.00 458 16.8 22.3 22.3 INACTIVE DEM 2.00 614 22.5 29.9 52.3 ACTIVE REPUB 3.00 246 9.0 12.0 64.3 INACTIVE REP 4.00 526 19.3 25.6 89.9 ACTIVE IND 5.00 43 1.6 2.1 92.0 INACTIVE IND 6.00 164 6.0 8.0 100.0 . 524 19.2 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 150 5.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2051 Missing cases 674 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PTYF4A Q22, PID father Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACTIVE DEM 1.00 494 18.1 24.0 24.0 INACTIVE DEM 2.00 586 21.5 28.4 52.4 ACTIVE REPUB 3.00 310 11.4 15.0 67.4 INACTIVE REP 4.00 495 18.2 24.0 91.4 ACTIVE IND 5.00 45 1.7 2.2 93.6 INACTIVE IND 6.00 132 4.8 6.4 100.0 . 532 19.5 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 131 4.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2062 Missing cases 663 PTYSP4A Q22, PID spouse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACTIVE DEM 1.00 479 17.6 28.8 28.8 INACTIVE DEM 2.00 328 12.0 19.7 48.5 ACTIVE REPUB 3.00 434 15.9 26.1 74.6 INACTIVE REP 4.00 252 9.2 15.2 89.8 ACTIVE IND 5.00 50 1.8 3.0 92.8 INACTIVE IND 6.00 120 4.4 7.2 100.0 . 1042 38.2 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 20 .7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1663 Missing cases 1062 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SPATT4A Q23, spouse's attitude Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUCH IN FAVOR 1.00 1135 41.7 56.4 56.4 SOMEWHAT IN FAVOR 2.00 386 14.2 19.2 75.5 MIXED FEELINGS 3.00 155 5.7 7.7 83.2 SOMEWHAT AGAINST 4.00 34 1.2 1.7 84.9 VERY MUCH OPPOSED 5.00 6 .2 .3 85.2 NOT CONCERNED 6.00 165 6.1 8.2 93.4 NOT MARRIED 8.00 133 4.9 6.6 100.0 . 711 26.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2014 Missing cases 711 SPATD4A Q24, spouse attended caucus Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1.00 1092 40.1 55.3 55.3 NO 2.00 883 32.4 44.7 100.0 . 750 27.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1975 Missing cases 750 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SPSUP4A Q25, spouse supported write-in Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent REAGAN 1.00 299 11.0 34.1 34.1 OTHER REP 2.00 17 .6 1.9 36.0 ASKEW 11.00 5 .2 .6 36.6 CRANSTON 12.00 16 .6 1.8 38.4 GLENN 13.00 17 .6 1.9 40.4 HART 14.00 162 5.9 18.5 58.8 HOLLINGS 15.00 2 .1 .2 59.1 JACKSON 16.00 42 1.5 4.8 63.9 MCGOVERN 17.00 23 .8 2.6 66.5 MONDALE 18.00 294 10.8 33.5 100.0 . 1799 66.0 Missing DK 98.00 49 1.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 877 Missing cases 1848 AGE4A Q26, age Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 17.00 1 .0 .0 .0 18.00 20 .7 .9 .9 19.00 9 .3 .4 1.3 20.00 5 .2 .2 1.5 21.00 10 .4 .4 1.9 22.00 16 .6 .7 2.6 23.00 15 .6 .6 3.3 24.00 21 .8 .9 4.2 25.00 17 .6 .7 4.9 26.00 23 .8 1.0 5.9 27.00 19 .7 .8 6.7 28.00 20 .7 .9 7.6 29.00 19 .7 .8 8.4 30.00 34 1.2 1.5 9.9 31.00 26 1.0 1.1 11.0 32.00 37 1.4 1.6 12.6 33.00 41 1.5 1.8 14.4 34.00 33 1.2 1.4 15.8 35.00 46 1.7 2.0 17.8 36.00 43 1.6 1.9 19.6 37.00 37 1.4 1.6 21.2 38.00 32 1.2 1.4 22.6 39.00 40 1.5 1.7 24.3 40.00 46 1.7 2.0 26.3 41.00 48 1.8 2.1 28.4 42.00 53 1.9 2.3 30.7 43.00 39 1.4 1.7 32.3 44.00 35 1.3 1.5 33.9 45.00 47 1.7 2.0 35.9 46.00 41 1.5 1.8 37.6 47.00 44 1.6 1.9 39.5 48.00 55 2.0 2.4 41.9 49.00 45 1.7 1.9 43.9 50.00 65 2.4 2.8 46.7 51.00 53 1.9 2.3 48.9 52.00 53 1.9 2.3 51.2 53.00 65 2.4 2.8 54.0 54.00 50 1.8 2.2 56.2 55.00 56 2.1 2.4 58.6 56.00 59 2.2 2.5 61.1 57.00 57 2.1 2.5 63.6 58.00 72 2.6 3.1 66.7 59.00 56 2.1 2.4 69.1 60.00 67 2.5 2.9 72.0 61.00 52 1.9 2.2 74.3 62.00 61 2.2 2.6 76.9 AGE4A Q26, age 63.00 63 2.3 2.7 79.6 64.00 56 2.1 2.4 82.0 65.00 63 2.3 2.7 84.7 66.00 47 1.7 2.0 86.8 67.00 46 1.7 2.0 88.7 68.00 39 1.4 1.7 90.4 69.00 32 1.2 1.4 91.8 70.00 30 1.1 1.3 93.1 71.00 26 1.0 1.1 94.2 72.00 23 .8 1.0 95.2 73.00 18 .7 .8 96.0 74.00 22 .8 .9 96.9 75.00 8 .3 .3 97.3 76.00 12 .4 .5 97.8 77.00 11 .4 .5 98.3 78.00 11 .4 .5 98.7 79.00 8 .3 .3 99.1 80.00 8 .3 .3 99.4 81.00 2 .1 .1 99.5 82.00 1 .0 .0 99.6 83.00 2 .1 .1 99.7 84.00 2 .1 .1 99.7 86.00 1 .0 .0 99.8 87.00 1 .0 .0 99.8 88.00 2 .1 .1 99.9 90.00 1 .0 .0 100.0 92.00 1 .0 .0 100.0 . 406 14.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2319 Missing cases 406 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SEX4A Q27, sex Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MALE 1.00 1244 45.7 52.3 52.3 FEMALE 2.00 1135 41.7 47.7 100.0 . 346 12.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2379 Missing cases 346 MARR4A Q28, married Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1.00 1839 67.5 79.4 79.4 NO 2.00 478 17.5 20.6 100.0 . 408 15.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2317 Missing cases 408 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - REL4A Q29, religious preference Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CATHOLIC 1.00 498 18.3 21.1 21.1 JEWISH 2.00 32 1.2 1.4 22.5 SO BAPTIST 3.00 149 5.5 6.3 28.8 OTHER BAPTIST 4.00 177 6.5 7.5 36.3 CHURCH OF CHRIST 5.00 40 1.5 1.7 38.0 CONGREGATIONALIST 6.00 64 2.3 2.7 40.8 EPISCOPALIAN 7.00 143 5.2 6.1 46.8 MORMON 8.00 6 .2 .3 47.1 LUTHERAN 9.00 227 8.3 9.6 56.7 METHODIST 10.00 399 14.6 16.9 73.7 PRESBYTERIAN 11.00 218 8.0 9.3 82.9 CHURCH OF CHRIST 12.00 17 .6 .7 83.7 OTHER PROTESTANT 13.00 100 3.7 4.2 87.9 GREEK ORTHODOX 14.00 5 .2 .2 88.1 AGNOST,ATH 15.00 101 3.7 4.3 92.4 OTHER 20.00 179 6.6 7.6 100.0 . 370 13.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2355 Missing cases 370 BNAG4A Q30, born again Christian Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1.00 651 23.9 28.1 28.1 NO 2.00 1662 61.0 71.9 100.0 . 412 15.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2313 Missing cases 412 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDAM4A Q31, fundamentalist Christian Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1.00 566 20.8 25.6 25.6 NO 2.00 1642 60.3 74.4 100.0 . 517 19.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2208 Missing cases 517 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HOWREL4A Q32, How religious are you? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY 1.00 347 12.7 14.7 14.7 RELIGIOUS 2.00 1414 51.9 60.0 74.7 NOT VERY 3.00 454 16.7 19.3 93.9 NOT AT ALL 4.00 143 5.2 6.1 100.0 . 332 12.2 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 35 1.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2358 Missing cases 367 RACE4A Q33, race Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent WHITE 1.00 2200 80.7 93.1 93.1 BLACK 2.00 164 6.0 6.9 100.0 . 361 13.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2364 Missing cases 361 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SCHOOL4A Q34, level of formal schooling Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent GRADE SCHOOL 1.00 74 2.7 3.1 3.1 SOME HS 2.00 111 4.1 4.6 7.7 HS GRADUATE 3.00 555 20.4 23.1 30.8 SOME COLLEGE 4.00 573 21.0 23.8 54.6 COLLEGE GRAD 5.00 514 18.9 21.4 76.0 GRADUATE SCHOOL 6.00 577 21.2 24.0 100.0 . 321 11.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2404 Missing cases 321 EMPYOU4A Q35, your employment Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SMALL BUSINESS 1.00 263 9.7 11.3 11.3 LARGE BUSINESS 2.00 495 18.2 21.2 32.4 EDUCATIONAL INSTITUT 3.00 408 15.0 17.5 49.9 GOVERNMENT 4.00 329 12.1 14.1 64.0 SELF-EMPLOYED-BUS 5.00 206 7.6 8.8 72.8 SELF-EMPLOYED-FARM 6.00 160 5.9 6.8 79.7 SELF-EMPLOYED-PROF 7.00 160 5.9 6.8 86.5 HOUSEWIFE 8.00 263 9.7 11.3 97.8 STUDENT 9.00 52 1.9 2.2 100.0 . 389 14.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2336 Missing cases 389 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EMPSP4A Q35, spouse's employment Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SMALL BUSINESS 1.00 222 8.1 12.1 12.1 LARGE BUSINESS 2.00 377 13.8 20.6 32.7 EDUCATIONAL INSTITUT 3.00 286 10.5 15.6 48.3 GOVERNMENT 4.00 210 7.7 11.5 59.7 SELF-EMPLOYED-BUS 5.00 150 5.5 8.2 67.9 SELF-EMPLOYED-FARM 6.00 140 5.1 7.6 75.5 SELF-EMPLOYED-PROF 7.00 102 3.7 5.6 81.1 HOUSEWIFE 8.00 339 12.4 18.5 99.6 STUDENT 9.00 8 .3 .4 100.0 . 891 32.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1834 Missing cases 891 JOBYOU4A Q35a, your job category Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PROFESSIONAL 1.00 890 32.7 38.8 38.8 OWNER-PARTNER 2.00 324 11.9 14.1 52.9 UPPER MANAGEMENT 3.00 125 4.6 5.4 58.4 MIDDLE-MANAG 4.00 242 8.9 10.5 68.9 SKILLED LABOR 5.00 347 12.7 15.1 84.0 UNSKILLED LABOR 6.00 132 4.8 5.8 89.8 OTHER 7.00 234 8.6 10.2 100.0 . 431 15.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2294 Missing cases 431 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - JOBSP4A Q35a, spouse's job category Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PROFESSIONAL 1.00 573 21.0 32.3 32.3 OWNER-PARTNER 2.00 288 10.6 16.3 48.6 UPPER MANAGEMENT 3.00 114 4.2 6.4 55.0 MIDDLE-MANAG 4.00 177 6.5 10.0 65.0 SKILLED LABOR 5.00 296 10.9 16.7 81.7 UNSKILLED LABOR 6.00 98 3.6 5.5 87.2 OTHER 7.00 226 8.3 12.8 100.0 . 953 35.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1772 Missing cases 953 INCOME4A Q36, approx family income Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNDER $9,999 1.00 191 7.0 8.4 8.4 $10,000-19,999 2.00 404 14.8 17.7 26.1 $20,000-29,999 3.00 464 17.0 20.4 46.5 $30,000-39,999 4.00 448 16.4 19.7 66.2 $40,000-49,999 5.00 302 11.1 13.3 79.4 $50,000-59,999 6.00 175 6.4 7.7 87.1 $60,000-69,999 7.00 104 3.8 4.6 91.7 $70,000-79,999 8.00 45 1.7 2.0 93.6 $80,000+ 9.00 145 5.3 6.4 100.0 . 447 16.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2278 Missing cases 447 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLASS4A Q37, describe your social class Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UPPER 1.00 33 1.2 1.4 1.4 UPPER-MIDDLE 2.00 565 20.7 23.6 25.0 MIDDLE 3.00 1142 41.9 47.7 72.7 LOWER-MIDDLE 4.00 183 6.7 7.7 80.4 WORKING 5.00 190 7.0 7.9 88.3 OTHER-NOT IN CLASS 6.00 279 10.2 11.7 100.0 . 333 12.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2392 Missing cases 333 RSPN84A 1984 A wave response Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO .00 3 .1 .1 .1 YES 1.00 2722 99.9 99.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 *1984B* MONWM4B Q1, money Walter Mondale Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2365 86.8 86.8 86.8 CHECKED 1.00 360 13.2 13.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 MONGH4B Q1, money Gary Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2600 95.4 95.4 95.4 CHECKED 1.00 125 4.6 4.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONJJ4B Q1, money Jesse Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2678 98.3 98.3 98.3 CHECKED 1.00 47 1.7 1.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONJG4B Q1, money John Glenn Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2700 99.1 99.1 99.1 CHECKED 1.00 25 .9 .9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 MONGM4B Q1, money George McGovern Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2710 99.4 99.4 99.4 CHECKED 1.00 15 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONRR4B Q1, money Ronald Reagan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2241 82.2 82.2 82.2 CHECKED 1.00 484 17.8 17.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVWM4B Q1, canvassing Walter Mondale Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2604 95.6 95.6 95.6 CHECKED 1.00 121 4.4 4.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 CANVGH4B Q1, canvassing Gary Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2694 98.9 98.9 98.9 CHECKED 1.00 31 1.1 1.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVJJ4B Q1, canvassing Jesse Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2707 99.3 99.3 99.3 CHECKED 1.00 18 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVJG4B Q1, canvassing John Glenn Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2721 99.9 99.9 99.9 CHECKED 1.00 4 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 CANVGM4B Q1, canvassing George McGovern Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2721 99.9 99.9 99.9 CHECKED 1.00 4 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVRR4B Q1, canvassing Ronald Reagan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2497 91.6 91.6 91.6 CHECKED 1.00 228 8.4 8.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVWM4B Q1, convince Walter Mondale Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2181 80.0 80.0 80.0 CHECKED 1.00 544 20.0 20.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 CONVGH4B Q1, convince Gary Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2518 92.4 92.4 92.4 CHECKED 1.00 207 7.6 7.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVJJ4B Q1, convince Jesse Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2661 97.7 97.7 97.7 CHECKED 1.00 64 2.3 2.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVJG4B Q1, convince John Glenn Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2686 98.6 98.6 98.6 CHECKED 1.00 39 1.4 1.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 CONVGM4B Q1, convince George McGovern Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2684 98.5 98.5 98.5 CHECKED 1.00 41 1.5 1.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVRR4B Q1, convince Ronald Reagan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2112 77.5 77.5 77.5 CHECKED 1.00 613 22.5 22.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLERWM4B Q1, clerical work Walter Mondale Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2669 97.9 97.9 97.9 CHECKED 1.00 56 2.1 2.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 CLERGH4B Q1, clerical work Gary Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2709 99.4 99.4 99.4 CHECKED 1.00 16 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLERJJ4B Q1, clerical work Jesse Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2716 99.7 99.7 99.7 CHECKED 1.00 9 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLERJG4B Q1, clerical work John Glenn Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2724 100.0 100.0 100.0 CHECKED 1.00 1 .0 .0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 CLERGM4B Q1, clerical work George McGovern Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2724 100.0 100.0 100.0 CHECKED 1.00 1 .0 .0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLERRR4B Q1, clerical work Ronald Reagan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2578 94.6 94.6 94.6 CHECKED 1.00 147 5.4 5.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDWM4B Q1, fundraising Walter Mondale Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2648 97.2 97.2 97.2 CHECKED 1.00 77 2.8 2.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 FUNDGH4B Q1, fundraising Gary Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2707 99.3 99.3 99.3 CHECKED 1.00 18 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDJJ4B Q1, fundraising Jesse Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2713 99.6 99.6 99.6 CHECKED 1.00 12 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDJG4B Q1, fundraising John Glenn Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2721 99.9 99.9 99.9 CHECKED 1.00 4 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 FUNDGM4B Q1, fundraising George McGovern Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2723 99.9 99.9 99.9 CHECKED 1.00 2 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDRR4B Q1, fundraising Ronald Reagan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2547 93.5 93.5 93.5 CHECKED 1.00 178 6.5 6.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTWM4B Q1, rally Walter Mondale Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2286 83.9 83.9 83.9 CHECKED 1.00 439 16.1 16.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 ATTGH4B Q1, rally Gary Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2560 93.9 93.9 93.9 CHECKED 1.00 165 6.1 6.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTJJ4B Q1, rally Jesse Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2653 97.4 97.4 97.4 CHECKED 1.00 72 2.6 2.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTJG4B Q1, rally John Glenn Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2684 98.5 98.5 98.5 CHECKED 1.00 41 1.5 1.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 ATTGM4B Q1, rally George McGovern Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2697 99.0 99.0 99.0 CHECKED 1.00 28 1.0 1.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTRR4B Q1, rally Ronald Reagan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2164 79.4 79.4 79.4 CHECKED 1.00 561 20.6 20.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONRB4B Q2, money Reagan-Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2328 85.4 85.4 85.4 CHECKED 1.00 397 14.6 14.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 MONMF4B Q2, money Mondale-Ferraro Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2320 85.1 85.1 85.1 CHECKED 1.00 405 14.9 14.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONDS4B Q2, money Dem Senate candidate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2458 90.2 90.2 90.2 CHECKED 1.00 267 9.8 9.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONRS4B Q2, money Rep Senate candidate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2417 88.7 88.7 88.7 CHECKED 1.00 308 11.3 11.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 MONDH4B Q2, money Dem House candidate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2477 90.9 90.9 90.9 CHECKED 1.00 248 9.1 9.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONRH4B Q2, money Rep House candidate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2424 89.0 89.0 89.0 CHECKED 1.00 301 11.0 11.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONDL4B Q2, money local Dem candidate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2500 91.7 91.7 91.7 CHECKED 1.00 225 8.3 8.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 MONRL4B Q2, money local Rep candidate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2338 85.8 85.8 85.8 CHECKED 1.00 387 14.2 14.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVRB4B Q2, canvassing Reagan-Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2463 90.4 90.4 90.4 CHECKED 1.00 262 9.6 9.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVMF4B Q2, canvassing Mondale-Ferraro Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2581 94.7 94.7 94.7 CHECKED 1.00 144 5.3 5.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 CANVDS4B Q2, canvassing Dem Senate candidate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2625 96.3 96.3 96.3 CHECKED 1.00 100 3.7 3.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVRS4B Q2, canvassing Rep Senate candidate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2548 93.5 93.5 93.5 CHECKED 1.00 177 6.5 6.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVDH4B Q2, canvassing Dem House candidate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2629 96.5 96.5 96.5 CHECKED 1.00 96 3.5 3.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 CANVRH4B Q2, canvassing Rep House candidate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2555 93.8 93.8 93.8 CHECKED 1.00 170 6.2 6.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVDL4B Q2, canvassing local Dem candidate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2632 96.6 96.6 96.6 CHECKED 1.00 93 3.4 3.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVRL4B Q2, canvassing local Rep candidate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2490 91.4 91.4 91.4 CHECKED 1.00 235 8.6 8.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 CONVRB4B Q2, convince Reagan-Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2159 79.2 79.2 79.2 CHECKED 1.00 566 20.8 20.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVMF4B Q2, convince Mondale-Ferraro Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2049 75.2 75.2 75.2 CHECKED 1.00 676 24.8 24.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVDS4B Q2, convince Dem Senate candidate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2306 84.6 84.6 84.6 CHECKED 1.00 419 15.4 15.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 CONVRS4B Q2, convince Rep Senate candidate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2345 86.1 86.1 86.1 CHECKED 1.00 380 13.9 13.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVDH4B Q2, convince Dem House candidate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2367 86.9 86.9 86.9 CHECKED 1.00 358 13.1 13.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVRH4B Q2, convince Rep House candidate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2372 87.0 87.0 87.0 CHECKED 1.00 353 13.0 13.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 CONVDL4B Q2, convince local Dem candidate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2407 88.3 88.3 88.3 CHECKED 1.00 318 11.7 11.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVRL4B Q2, convince local Rep candidate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2301 84.4 84.4 84.4 CHECKED 1.00 424 15.6 15.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLERRB4B Q2, clerical work Reagan-Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2570 94.3 94.3 94.3 CHECKED 1.00 155 5.7 5.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 CLERMF4B Q2, clerical work Mondale-Ferraro Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2667 97.9 97.9 97.9 CHECKED 1.00 58 2.1 2.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLERDS4B Q2, clerical work Dem Senate candidate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2680 98.3 98.3 98.3 CHECKED 1.00 45 1.7 1.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLERRS4B Q2, clerical work Rep Senate candidate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2630 96.5 96.5 96.5 CHECKED 1.00 95 3.5 3.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 CLERDH4B Q2, clerical work Dem House candidate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2676 98.2 98.2 98.2 CHECKED 1.00 49 1.8 1.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLERRH4B Q2, clerical work Rep House candidate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2627 96.4 96.4 96.4 CHECKED 1.00 98 3.6 3.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLERDL4B Q2, clerical work local Dem candidate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2672 98.1 98.1 98.1 CHECKED 1.00 53 1.9 1.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 CLERRL4B Q2, clerical work local Rep candidate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2575 94.5 94.5 94.5 CHECKED 1.00 150 5.5 5.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDRB4B Q2, fundraising Reagan-Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2565 94.1 94.1 94.1 CHECKED 1.00 160 5.9 5.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDMF4B Q2, fundraising Mondale-Ferraro Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2632 96.6 96.6 96.6 CHECKED 1.00 93 3.4 3.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 FUNDDS4B Q2, fundraising Dem Senate candidate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2661 97.7 97.7 97.7 CHECKED 1.00 64 2.3 2.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDRS4B Q2, fundraising Rep Senate candidate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2602 95.5 95.5 95.5 CHECKED 1.00 123 4.5 4.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDDH4B Q2, fundraising Dem House candidate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2645 97.1 97.1 97.1 CHECKED 1.00 80 2.9 2.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 FUNDRH4B Q2, fundraising Rep House candidate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2582 94.8 94.8 94.8 CHECKED 1.00 143 5.2 5.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDDL4B Q2, fundraising local Dem candidate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2664 97.8 97.8 97.8 CHECKED 1.00 61 2.2 2.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDRL4B Q2, fundraising local Rep candidate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2546 93.4 93.4 93.4 CHECKED 1.00 179 6.6 6.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 ATTRB4B Q2, rally Reagan-Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2268 83.2 83.2 83.2 CHECKED 1.00 457 16.8 16.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTMF4B Q2, rally Mondale-Ferraro Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2321 85.2 85.2 85.2 CHECKED 1.00 404 14.8 14.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTDS4B Q2, rally Dem Senate candidate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2483 91.1 91.1 91.1 CHECKED 1.00 242 8.9 8.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 ATTRS4B Q2, rally Rep Senate candidate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2387 87.6 87.6 87.6 CHECKED 1.00 338 12.4 12.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTDH4B Q2, rally Dem House candidate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2500 91.7 91.7 91.7 CHECKED 1.00 225 8.3 8.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTRH4B Q2, rally Rep House candidate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2413 88.6 88.6 88.6 CHECKED 1.00 312 11.4 11.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 ATTDL4B Q2, rally local Dem candidate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2509 92.1 92.1 92.1 CHECKED 1.00 216 7.9 7.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTRL4B Q2, rally local Rep candidate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED .00 2347 86.1 86.1 86.1 CHECKED 1.00 378 13.9 13.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - VOTE844B Q3, How vote in 1984 presidential race? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent REAGAN 1.00 881 32.3 44.6 44.6 MONDALE 2.00 1073 39.4 54.3 98.9 OTHER 3.00 13 .5 .7 99.5 DID NOT VOTE 4.00 9 .3 .5 100.0 . 749 27.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1976 Missing cases 749 SPVOTE4B Q4, How spouse voted in 1984? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent REAGAN 1.00 723 26.5 40.5 40.5 MONDALE 2.00 763 28.0 42.7 83.2 OTHER 3.00 7 .3 .4 83.5 DID NOT VOTE 4.00 35 1.3 2.0 85.5 NOT MARRIED 5.00 259 9.5 14.5 100.0 . 938 34.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1787 Missing cases 938 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SENVOT4B Q5, Senate election vote Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent REPUBLICAN 1.00 852 31.3 43.1 43.1 DEMOCRAT 2.00 1102 40.4 55.8 98.9 OTHER 3.00 5 .2 .3 99.2 DID NOT VOTE 4.00 15 .6 .8 99.9 5.00 1 .0 .1 100.0 . 750 27.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1975 Missing cases 750 HSEVOT4B Q6, House election vote Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent REPUBLICAN 1.00 799 29.3 40.8 40.8 DEMOCRAT 2.00 1076 39.5 55.0 95.8 OTHER 3.00 10 .4 .5 96.3 DID NOT VOTE 4.00 71 2.6 3.6 99.9 5.00 1 .0 .1 100.0 . 768 28.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1957 Missing cases 768 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CAM844B Q7, involved in 1984 campaign? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1.00 1059 38.9 55.1 55.1 NO 2.00 863 31.7 44.9 100.0 . 803 29.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1922 Missing cases 803 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HELPPP4B Q7a, help political party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY 1.00 730 26.8 71.9 71.9 SOMEWHAT 2.00 235 8.6 23.2 95.1 NOT VERY 3.00 40 1.5 3.9 99.0 NOT AT ALL 4.00 10 .4 1.0 100.0 . 1710 62.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1015 Missing cases 1710 FRIEND4B Q7a, asked by friend Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY 1.00 85 3.1 12.4 12.4 SOMEWHAT 2.00 144 5.3 21.0 33.4 NOT VERY 3.00 150 5.5 21.9 55.2 NOT AT ALL 4.00 307 11.3 44.8 100.0 . 2039 74.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 686 Missing cases 2039 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MEMBER4B Q7a, asked by member org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY 1.00 163 6.0 22.8 22.8 SOMEWHAT 2.00 106 3.9 14.8 37.6 NOT VERY 3.00 86 3.2 12.0 49.6 NOT AT ALL 4.00 361 13.2 50.4 100.0 . 2009 73.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 716 Missing cases 2009 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CAND4B Q7a, support for pres cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY 1.00 736 27.0 76.2 76.2 SOMEWHAT 2.00 167 6.1 17.3 93.5 NOT VERY 3.00 39 1.4 4.0 97.5 NOT AT ALL 4.00 24 .9 2.5 100.0 . 1759 64.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 966 Missing cases 1759 VP4B Q7a, support for VP cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY 1.00 456 16.7 53.0 53.0 SOMEWHAT 2.00 221 8.1 25.7 78.7 NOT VERY 3.00 98 3.6 11.4 90.1 NOT AT ALL 4.00 85 3.1 9.9 100.0 . 1865 68.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 860 Missing cases 1865 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ISS4B Q7a, because of issues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY 1.00 879 32.3 87.3 87.3 SOMEWHAT 2.00 109 4.0 10.8 98.1 NOT VERY 3.00 9 .3 .9 99.0 NOT AT ALL 4.00 10 .4 1.0 100.0 . 1718 63.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1007 Missing cases 1718 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EXCITE4B Q7a, campaign excitement Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY 1.00 146 5.4 18.3 18.3 SOMEWHAT 2.00 195 7.2 24.4 42.6 NOT VERY 3.00 217 8.0 27.1 69.8 NOT AT ALL 4.00 242 8.9 30.3 100.0 . 1925 70.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 800 Missing cases 1925 MIREAS4B Q7b, most important issue in Q7a: Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PARTY 1.00 320 11.7 30.9 30.9 FRIEND 2.00 14 .5 1.4 32.2 ORGANIZATION 3.00 20 .7 1.9 34.2 PRES CAND 4.00 160 5.9 15.4 49.6 VP CAND 5.00 19 .7 1.8 51.4 ISSUES 6.00 487 17.9 47.0 98.5 EXCITEMENT 7.00 16 .6 1.5 100.0 . 1689 62.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1036 Missing cases 1689 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PTYID4B Q8, describe your party affiliation Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONG DEMOCRAT 1.00 621 22.8 32.6 32.6 WEAK DEMOCRAT 2.00 236 8.7 12.4 44.9 INDEPENDENT DEM 3.00 193 7.1 10.1 55.1 INDEPENDENT 4.00 31 1.1 1.6 56.7 INDEPENDENT REP 5.00 83 3.0 4.4 61.0 WEAK REPUBLICAN 6.00 153 5.6 8.0 69.1 STRONG REPUBLICAN 7.00 590 21.7 30.9 100.0 . 813 29.8 Missing OTHER 8.00 5 .2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 DEBAT14B Q9, watched first debate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1.00 1647 60.4 92.7 92.7 NO 2.00 130 4.8 7.3 100.0 . 948 34.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1777 Missing cases 948 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEBAT24B Q9, watched second debate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1.00 691 25.4 38.8 38.8 NO 2.00 1089 40.0 61.2 100.0 . 945 34.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1780 Missing cases 945 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEBAT34B Q9, watched third debate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1.00 620 22.8 36.6 36.6 NO 2.00 1075 39.4 63.4 100.0 . 1030 37.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1695 Missing cases 1030 LIBCON4B Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1.00 78 2.9 4.2 4.2 LIBERAL 2.00 351 12.9 18.7 22.9 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3.00 257 9.4 13.7 36.6 M-O-R 4.00 300 11.0 16.0 52.6 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5.00 311 11.4 16.6 69.2 CONSERVATIVE 6.00 503 18.5 26.8 96.1 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7.00 74 2.7 3.9 100.0 . 807 29.6 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 44 1.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1874 Missing cases 851 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABORT4B Q11, abortion amendment Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1.00 410 15.0 22.6 22.6 FAVOR 2.00 209 7.7 11.5 34.0 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3.00 112 4.1 6.2 40.2 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5.00 93 3.4 5.1 45.3 OPPOSE 6.00 424 15.6 23.3 68.6 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7.00 570 20.9 31.4 100.0 . 755 27.7 Missing NOT SURE 4.00 152 5.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1818 Missing cases 907 DEFSP4B Q11, increased defense spending Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1.00 130 4.8 7.0 7.0 FAVOR 2.00 244 9.0 13.1 20.1 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3.00 227 8.3 12.2 32.3 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5.00 205 7.5 11.0 43.4 OPPOSE 6.00 442 16.2 23.8 67.1 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7.00 611 22.4 32.9 100.0 . 757 27.8 Missing NOT SURE 4.00 109 4.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1859 Missing cases 866 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AFFACT4B Q11, affirmative action programs Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1.00 203 7.4 11.9 11.9 FAVOR 2.00 399 14.6 23.5 35.4 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3.00 385 14.1 22.6 58.0 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5.00 246 9.0 14.5 72.5 OPPOSE 6.00 298 10.9 17.5 90.0 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7.00 170 6.2 10.0 100.0 . 771 28.3 Missing NOT SURE 4.00 253 9.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1701 Missing cases 1024 CENTAM4B Q11, military aid to Central Amer Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1.00 107 3.9 6.5 6.5 FAVOR 2.00 260 9.5 15.7 22.1 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3.00 260 9.5 15.7 37.8 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5.00 152 5.6 9.2 47.0 OPPOSE 6.00 399 14.6 24.1 71.1 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7.00 479 17.6 28.9 100.0 . 765 28.1 Missing NOT SURE 4.00 303 11.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1657 Missing cases 1068 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TAXES4B Q11, raise taxes to reduce deficit Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1.00 138 5.1 7.8 7.8 FAVOR 2.00 364 13.4 20.5 28.3 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3.00 417 15.3 23.5 51.9 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5.00 174 6.4 9.8 61.7 OPPOSE 6.00 371 13.6 20.9 82.6 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7.00 308 11.3 17.4 100.0 . 755 27.7 Missing NOT SURE 4.00 198 7.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1772 Missing cases 953 LCRR4B Q12, Ronald Reagan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1.00 30 1.1 1.6 1.6 LIBERAL 2.00 33 1.2 1.8 3.4 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3.00 19 .7 1.0 4.5 M-O-R 4.00 61 2.2 3.3 7.8 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5.00 146 5.4 7.9 15.7 CONSERVATIVE 6.00 1022 37.5 55.5 71.3 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7.00 529 19.4 28.7 100.0 . 812 29.8 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 73 2.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1840 Missing cases 885 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCGB4B Q12, George Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1.00 21 .8 1.2 1.2 LIBERAL 2.00 39 1.4 2.2 3.4 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3.00 59 2.2 3.4 6.8 M-O-R 4.00 245 9.0 14.0 20.7 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5.00 481 17.7 27.4 48.1 CONSERVATIVE 6.00 719 26.4 40.9 89.1 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7.00 192 7.0 10.9 100.0 . 870 31.9 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 99 3.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1756 Missing cases 969 LCWM4B Q12, Walter Mondale Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1.00 412 15.1 22.3 22.3 LIBERAL 2.00 924 33.9 50.0 72.3 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3.00 309 11.3 16.7 89.0 M-O-R 4.00 142 5.2 7.7 96.7 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5.00 32 1.2 1.7 98.4 CONSERVATIVE 6.00 25 .9 1.4 99.8 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7.00 4 .1 .2 100.0 . 824 30.2 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 53 1.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1848 Missing cases 877 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCGF4B Q12, Geraldine Ferraro Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1.00 543 19.9 29.8 29.8 LIBERAL 2.00 813 29.8 44.7 74.5 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3.00 301 11.0 16.5 91.0 M-O-R 4.00 110 4.0 6.0 97.1 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5.00 28 1.0 1.5 98.6 CONSERVATIVE 6.00 23 .8 1.3 99.9 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7.00 2 .1 .1 100.0 . 847 31.1 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 58 2.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1820 Missing cases 905 LCDP4B Q12, Democratic Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1.00 309 11.3 16.8 16.8 LIBERAL 2.00 930 34.1 50.5 67.2 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3.00 418 15.3 22.7 89.9 M-O-R 4.00 130 4.8 7.1 97.0 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5.00 22 .8 1.2 98.2 CONSERVATIVE 6.00 30 1.1 1.6 99.8 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7.00 4 .1 .2 100.0 . 827 30.3 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 55 2.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1843 Missing cases 882 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCRP4B Q12, Republican Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1.00 20 .7 1.1 1.1 LIBERAL 2.00 27 1.0 1.5 2.6 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3.00 36 1.3 2.0 4.6 M-O-R 4.00 133 4.9 7.4 12.1 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5.00 408 15.0 22.8 34.9 CONSERVATIVE 6.00 917 33.7 51.3 86.3 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7.00 245 9.0 13.7 100.0 . 870 31.9 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 69 2.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1786 Missing cases 939 LCAA4B Q12, average American voter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1.00 3 .1 .2 .2 LIBERAL 2.00 33 1.2 1.8 2.0 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3.00 126 4.6 7.0 9.0 M-O-R 4.00 640 23.5 35.5 44.5 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5.00 733 26.9 40.7 85.1 CONSERVATIVE 6.00 252 9.2 14.0 99.1 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7.00 16 .6 .9 100.0 . 830 30.5 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 92 3.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1803 Missing cases 922 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCST4B Q12, average voter in state Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1.00 7 .3 .4 .4 LIBERAL 2.00 47 1.7 2.6 3.0 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3.00 205 7.5 11.2 14.2 M-O-R 4.00 355 13.0 19.5 33.6 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5.00 562 20.6 30.8 64.4 CONSERVATIVE 6.00 569 20.9 31.2 95.6 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7.00 80 2.9 4.4 100.0 . 825 30.3 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 75 2.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1825 Missing cases 900 ABRTRR4B Q13, Ronald Reagan abortion Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVORS 1.00 872 32.0 48.6 48.6 FAVORS 2.00 633 23.2 35.3 83.9 SLIGHTLY FAVORS 3.00 122 4.5 6.8 90.7 NEUTRAL 4.00 50 1.8 2.8 93.5 SLIGHTLY OPPOSES 5.00 30 1.1 1.7 95.2 OPPOSES 6.00 56 2.1 3.1 98.3 STRONGLY OPPOSES 7.00 31 1.1 1.7 100.0 . 840 30.8 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 91 3.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1794 Missing cases 931 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABRTWM4B Q13, Walter Mondale abortion Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVORS 1.00 55 2.0 3.2 3.2 FAVORS 2.00 129 4.7 7.5 10.7 SLIGHTLY FAVORS 3.00 76 2.8 4.4 15.2 NEUTRAL 4.00 117 4.3 6.8 22.0 SLIGHTLY OPPOSES 5.00 148 5.4 8.6 30.6 OPPOSES 6.00 767 28.1 44.8 75.4 STRONGLY OPPOSES 7.00 421 15.4 24.6 100.0 . 887 32.6 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 125 4.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1713 Missing cases 1012 ABRTGB4B Q13, George Bush abortion Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVORS 1.00 257 9.4 15.9 15.9 FAVORS 2.00 578 21.2 35.9 51.8 SLIGHTLY FAVORS 3.00 364 13.4 22.6 74.4 NEUTRAL 4.00 189 6.9 11.7 86.1 SLIGHTLY OPPOSES 5.00 104 3.8 6.5 92.6 OPPOSES 6.00 84 3.1 5.2 97.8 STRONGLY OPPOSES 7.00 36 1.3 2.2 100.0 . 888 32.6 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 225 8.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1612 Missing cases 1113 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABRTGF4B Q13, Geraldine Ferraro abortion Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVORS 1.00 58 2.1 3.4 3.4 FAVORS 2.00 94 3.4 5.5 8.9 SLIGHTLY FAVORS 3.00 101 3.7 5.9 14.8 NEUTRAL 4.00 105 3.9 6.1 20.9 SLIGHTLY OPPOSES 5.00 158 5.8 9.2 30.2 OPPOSES 6.00 678 24.9 39.6 69.8 STRONGLY OPPOSES 7.00 516 18.9 30.2 100.0 . 902 33.1 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 113 4.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1710 Missing cases 1015 ABRTRP4B Q13, Republican Party abortion Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVORS 1.00 278 10.2 16.6 16.6 FAVORS 2.00 643 23.6 38.3 54.9 SLIGHTLY FAVORS 3.00 411 15.1 24.5 79.3 NEUTRAL 4.00 165 6.1 9.8 89.2 SLIGHTLY OPPOSES 5.00 77 2.8 4.6 93.7 OPPOSES 6.00 81 3.0 4.8 98.6 STRONGLY OPPOSES 7.00 24 .9 1.4 100.0 . 885 32.5 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 161 5.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1679 Missing cases 1046 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABRTDP4B Q13, Democratic Party abortion Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVORS 1.00 46 1.7 2.8 2.8 FAVORS 2.00 103 3.8 6.2 8.9 SLIGHTLY FAVORS 3.00 82 3.0 4.9 13.8 NEUTRAL 4.00 147 5.4 8.8 22.7 SLIGHTLY OPPOSES 5.00 289 10.6 17.3 40.0 OPPOSES 6.00 758 27.8 45.4 85.4 STRONGLY OPPOSES 7.00 243 8.9 14.6 100.0 . 874 32.1 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 183 6.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1668 Missing cases 1057 DEFSRR4B Q13, Ronald Reagan defense spending Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVORS 1.00 1136 41.7 60.4 60.4 FAVORS 2.00 575 21.1 30.6 91.0 SLIGHTLY FAVORS 3.00 122 4.5 6.5 97.5 NEUTRAL 4.00 9 .3 .5 98.0 SLIGHTLY OPPOSES 5.00 20 .7 1.1 99.0 OPPOSES 6.00 8 .3 .4 99.5 STRONGLY OPPOSES 7.00 10 .4 .5 100.0 . 813 29.8 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 32 1.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1880 Missing cases 845 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEFSWM4B Q13, Walter Mondale defense spending Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVORS 1.00 15 .6 .8 .8 FAVORS 2.00 43 1.6 2.4 3.2 SLIGHTLY FAVORS 3.00 89 3.3 4.9 8.1 NEUTRAL 4.00 35 1.3 1.9 10.0 SLIGHTLY OPPOSES 5.00 267 9.8 14.7 24.8 OPPOSES 6.00 776 28.5 42.8 67.6 STRONGLY OPPOSES 7.00 588 21.6 32.4 100.0 . 848 31.1 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 64 2.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1813 Missing cases 912 DEFSGB4B Q13, George Bush defense spending Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVORS 1.00 516 18.9 29.7 29.7 FAVORS 2.00 723 26.5 41.6 71.2 SLIGHTLY FAVORS 3.00 348 12.8 20.0 91.3 NEUTRAL 4.00 76 2.8 4.4 95.6 SLIGHTLY OPPOSES 5.00 31 1.1 1.8 97.4 OPPOSES 6.00 31 1.1 1.8 99.2 STRONGLY OPPOSES 7.00 14 .5 .8 100.0 . 859 31.5 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 127 4.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1739 Missing cases 986 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEFSGF4B Q13, Geraldine Ferraro defense spending Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVORS 1.00 12 .4 .7 .7 FAVORS 2.00 27 1.0 1.6 2.3 SLIGHTLY FAVORS 3.00 54 2.0 3.1 5.4 NEUTRAL 4.00 41 1.5 2.4 7.8 SLIGHTLY OPPOSES 5.00 193 7.1 11.2 19.0 OPPOSES 6.00 732 26.9 42.5 61.5 STRONGLY OPPOSES 7.00 663 24.3 38.5 100.0 . 895 32.8 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 108 4.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1722 Missing cases 1003 DEFSRP4B Q13, Republican Party defense spending Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVORS 1.00 410 15.0 23.2 23.2 FAVORS 2.00 738 27.1 41.8 65.0 SLIGHTLY FAVORS 3.00 490 18.0 27.7 92.7 NEUTRAL 4.00 59 2.2 3.3 96.0 SLIGHTLY OPPOSES 5.00 49 1.8 2.8 98.8 OPPOSES 6.00 15 .6 .8 99.7 STRONGLY OPPOSES 7.00 6 .2 .3 100.0 . 865 31.7 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 93 3.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1767 Missing cases 958 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEFSDP4B Q13, Democratic Party defense spending Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVORS 1.00 13 .5 .7 .7 FAVORS 2.00 28 1.0 1.6 2.3 SLIGHTLY FAVORS 3.00 66 2.4 3.8 6.1 NEUTRAL 4.00 55 2.0 3.1 9.2 SLIGHTLY OPPOSES 5.00 325 11.9 18.5 27.7 OPPOSES 6.00 848 31.1 48.3 76.0 STRONGLY OPPOSES 7.00 422 15.5 24.0 100.0 . 863 31.7 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 105 3.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1757 Missing cases 968 AFFRR4B Q13, Ronald Reagan affirmative action Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVORS 1.00 36 1.3 2.1 2.1 FAVORS 2.00 153 5.6 9.0 11.1 SLIGHTLY FAVORS 3.00 268 9.8 15.7 26.8 NEUTRAL 4.00 137 5.0 8.0 34.8 SLIGHTLY OPPOSES 5.00 227 8.3 13.3 48.2 OPPOSES 6.00 542 19.9 31.8 79.9 STRONGLY OPPOSES 7.00 342 12.6 20.1 100.0 . 859 31.5 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 161 5.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1705 Missing cases 1020 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AFFWM4B Q13, Walter Mondale affirmative action Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVORS 1.00 581 21.3 33.9 33.9 FAVORS 2.00 815 29.9 47.5 81.4 SLIGHTLY FAVORS 3.00 228 8.4 13.3 94.7 NEUTRAL 4.00 37 1.4 2.2 96.9 SLIGHTLY OPPOSES 5.00 18 .7 1.1 98.0 OPPOSES 6.00 21 .8 1.2 99.2 STRONGLY OPPOSES 7.00 14 .5 .8 100.0 . 873 32.0 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 138 5.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1714 Missing cases 1011 AFFGB4B Q13, George Bush affirmative action Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVORS 1.00 28 1.0 1.8 1.8 FAVORS 2.00 180 6.6 11.4 13.2 SLIGHTLY FAVORS 3.00 268 9.8 17.0 30.2 NEUTRAL 4.00 197 7.2 12.5 42.7 SLIGHTLY OPPOSES 5.00 244 9.0 15.5 58.2 OPPOSES 6.00 458 16.8 29.1 87.3 STRONGLY OPPOSES 7.00 200 7.3 12.7 100.0 . 900 33.0 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 250 9.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1575 Missing cases 1150 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AFFGF4B Q13, Geraldine Ferraro affirmative actio Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVORS 1.00 609 22.3 36.3 36.3 FAVORS 2.00 780 28.6 46.5 82.9 SLIGHTLY FAVORS 3.00 185 6.8 11.0 93.9 NEUTRAL 4.00 54 2.0 3.2 97.1 SLIGHTLY OPPOSES 5.00 12 .4 .7 97.9 OPPOSES 6.00 24 .9 1.4 99.3 STRONGLY OPPOSES 7.00 12 .4 .7 100.0 . 888 32.6 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 161 5.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1676 Missing cases 1049 AFFRP4B Q13, Republican Party affirmative action Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVORS 1.00 26 1.0 1.6 1.6 FAVORS 2.00 146 5.4 9.0 10.6 SLIGHTLY FAVORS 3.00 251 9.2 15.4 26.0 NEUTRAL 4.00 183 6.7 11.2 37.2 SLIGHTLY OPPOSES 5.00 304 11.2 18.7 55.9 OPPOSES 6.00 500 18.3 30.7 86.6 STRONGLY OPPOSES 7.00 219 8.0 13.4 100.0 . 901 33.1 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 195 7.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1629 Missing cases 1096 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AFFDP4B Q13, Democratic Party affirmative action Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVORS 1.00 471 17.3 28.0 28.0 FAVORS 2.00 820 30.1 48.8 76.8 SLIGHTLY FAVORS 3.00 294 10.8 17.5 94.3 NEUTRAL 4.00 50 1.8 3.0 97.3 SLIGHTLY OPPOSES 5.00 13 .5 .8 98.0 OPPOSES 6.00 21 .8 1.2 99.3 STRONGLY OPPOSES 7.00 12 .4 .7 100.0 . 885 32.5 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 159 5.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1681 Missing cases 1044 CENTRR4B Q13, Ronald Reagan Central America aid Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVORS 1.00 1062 39.0 59.0 59.0 FAVORS 2.00 631 23.2 35.0 94.0 SLIGHTLY FAVORS 3.00 87 3.2 4.8 98.8 NEUTRAL 4.00 9 .3 .5 99.3 SLIGHTLY OPPOSES 5.00 3 .1 .2 99.5 OPPOSES 6.00 5 .2 .3 99.8 STRONGLY OPPOSES 7.00 4 .1 .2 100.0 . 832 30.5 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 92 3.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1801 Missing cases 924 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CENTWM4B Q13, Walter Mondale Central America aid Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVORS 1.00 20 .7 1.2 1.2 FAVORS 2.00 61 2.2 3.6 4.8 SLIGHTLY FAVORS 3.00 166 6.1 9.8 14.6 NEUTRAL 4.00 79 2.9 4.7 19.3 SLIGHTLY OPPOSES 5.00 304 11.2 18.0 37.3 OPPOSES 6.00 691 25.4 40.9 78.3 STRONGLY OPPOSES 7.00 367 13.5 21.7 100.0 . 863 31.7 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 174 6.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1688 Missing cases 1037 CENTGB4B Q13, George Bush Central America aid Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVORS 1.00 634 23.3 37.6 37.6 FAVORS 2.00 752 27.6 44.6 82.2 SLIGHTLY FAVORS 3.00 230 8.4 13.6 95.8 NEUTRAL 4.00 36 1.3 2.1 97.9 SLIGHTLY OPPOSES 5.00 11 .4 .7 98.6 OPPOSES 6.00 15 .6 .9 99.5 STRONGLY OPPOSES 7.00 9 .3 .5 100.0 . 868 31.9 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 170 6.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1687 Missing cases 1038 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CENTGF4B Q13, Geraldine Ferraro Central America a Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVORS 1.00 14 .5 .9 .9 FAVORS 2.00 47 1.7 2.9 3.7 SLIGHTLY FAVORS 3.00 118 4.3 7.2 11.0 NEUTRAL 4.00 78 2.9 4.8 15.7 SLIGHTLY OPPOSES 5.00 226 8.3 13.8 29.6 OPPOSES 6.00 709 26.0 43.4 73.0 STRONGLY OPPOSES 7.00 440 16.1 27.0 100.0 . 885 32.5 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 208 7.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1632 Missing cases 1093 CENTRP4B Q13, Republican Party Central America ai Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVORS 1.00 431 15.8 25.4 25.4 FAVORS 2.00 705 25.9 41.5 66.9 SLIGHTLY FAVORS 3.00 438 16.1 25.8 92.8 NEUTRAL 4.00 75 2.8 4.4 97.2 SLIGHTLY OPPOSES 5.00 29 1.1 1.7 98.9 OPPOSES 6.00 13 .5 .8 99.6 STRONGLY OPPOSES 7.00 6 .2 .4 100.0 . 867 31.8 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 161 5.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1697 Missing cases 1028 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CENTDP4B Q13, Democratic Party Central America ai Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVORS 1.00 16 .6 1.0 1.0 FAVORS 2.00 41 1.5 2.5 3.5 SLIGHTLY FAVORS 3.00 128 4.7 7.8 11.2 NEUTRAL 4.00 117 4.3 7.1 18.3 SLIGHTLY OPPOSES 5.00 379 13.9 23.0 41.4 OPPOSES 6.00 710 26.1 43.1 84.5 STRONGLY OPPOSES 7.00 255 9.4 15.5 100.0 . 870 31.9 Missing NOT SURE 8.00 209 7.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1646 Missing cases 1079 EVALRR4B Q14, Ronald Reagan evaluation Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1.00 693 25.4 37.4 37.4 SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 2.00 235 8.6 12.7 50.1 NEUTRAL 3.00 115 4.2 6.2 56.3 SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 4.00 207 7.6 11.2 67.5 VERY UNFAVORABLE 5.00 601 22.1 32.5 100.0 . 874 32.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1851 Missing cases 874 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALWM4B Q14, Walter Mondale evaluation Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1.00 398 14.6 22.8 22.8 SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 2.00 436 16.0 25.0 47.8 NEUTRAL 3.00 187 6.9 10.7 58.6 SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 4.00 231 8.5 13.3 71.8 VERY UNFAVORABLE 5.00 491 18.0 28.2 100.0 . 982 36.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1743 Missing cases 982 EVALGB4B Q14, George Bush evaluation Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1.00 504 18.5 27.6 27.6 SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 2.00 353 13.0 19.3 46.9 NEUTRAL 3.00 219 8.0 12.0 58.9 SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 4.00 287 10.5 15.7 74.6 VERY UNFAVORABLE 5.00 464 17.0 25.4 100.0 . 898 33.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1827 Missing cases 898 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALGF4B Q14, Geraldine Ferraro evaluation Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1.00 451 16.6 26.1 26.1 SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 2.00 375 13.8 21.7 47.9 NEUTRAL 3.00 204 7.5 11.8 59.7 SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 4.00 163 6.0 9.4 69.2 VERY UNFAVORABLE 5.00 532 19.5 30.8 100.0 . 1000 36.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1725 Missing cases 1000 EVALHB4B Q14, Howard Baker evaluation Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1.00 284 10.4 16.5 16.5 SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 2.00 620 22.8 36.0 52.5 NEUTRAL 3.00 472 17.3 27.4 79.9 SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 4.00 230 8.4 13.4 93.3 VERY UNFAVORABLE 5.00 116 4.3 6.7 100.0 . 1003 36.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1722 Missing cases 1003 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALMC4B Q14, Mario Cuomo evaluation Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1.00 459 16.8 30.4 30.4 SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 2.00 311 11.4 20.6 51.0 NEUTRAL 3.00 276 10.1 18.3 69.3 SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 4.00 197 7.2 13.1 82.4 VERY UNFAVORABLE 5.00 266 9.8 17.6 100.0 . 1216 44.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1509 Missing cases 1216 EVALED4B Q14, Elizabeth Dole evaluation Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1.00 224 8.2 13.6 13.6 SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 2.00 454 16.7 27.5 41.1 NEUTRAL 3.00 532 19.5 32.2 73.3 SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 4.00 241 8.8 14.6 87.9 VERY UNFAVORABLE 5.00 199 7.3 12.1 100.0 . 1075 39.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1650 Missing cases 1075 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALGH4B Q14, Gary Hart evaluation Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1.00 316 11.6 18.5 18.5 SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 2.00 511 18.8 29.9 48.3 NEUTRAL 3.00 339 12.4 19.8 68.1 SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 4.00 322 11.8 18.8 87.0 VERY UNFAVORABLE 5.00 223 8.2 13.0 100.0 . 1014 37.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1711 Missing cases 1014 EVALJJ4B Q14, Jesse Jackson evaluation Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1.00 183 6.7 10.3 10.3 SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 2.00 370 13.6 20.9 31.2 NEUTRAL 3.00 337 12.4 19.0 50.3 SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 4.00 281 10.3 15.9 66.2 VERY UNFAVORABLE 5.00 599 22.0 33.8 100.0 . 955 35.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1770 Missing cases 955 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALJK4B Q14, Jack Kemp evaluation Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1.00 257 9.4 17.8 17.8 SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 2.00 308 11.3 21.3 39.0 NEUTRAL 3.00 356 13.1 24.6 63.6 SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 4.00 202 7.4 14.0 77.6 VERY UNFAVORABLE 5.00 324 11.9 22.4 100.0 . 1278 46.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1447 Missing cases 1278 EVALEK4B Q14, Edward Kennedy evaluation Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1.00 363 13.3 20.2 20.2 SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 2.00 370 13.6 20.6 40.9 NEUTRAL 3.00 204 7.5 11.4 52.2 SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 4.00 222 8.1 12.4 64.6 VERY UNFAVORABLE 5.00 635 23.3 35.4 100.0 . 931 34.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1794 Missing cases 931 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALRP4B Q14, Republican Party evaluation Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1.00 534 19.6 31.1 31.1 SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 2.00 290 10.6 16.9 48.0 NEUTRAL 3.00 201 7.4 11.7 59.8 SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 4.00 283 10.4 16.5 76.3 VERY UNFAVORABLE 5.00 407 14.9 23.7 100.0 . 1010 37.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1715 Missing cases 1010 EVALDP4B Q14, Democratic Party evaluation Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1.00 590 21.7 32.3 32.3 SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 2.00 392 14.4 21.5 53.8 NEUTRAL 3.00 170 6.2 9.3 63.2 SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 4.00 274 10.1 15.0 78.2 VERY UNFAVORABLE 5.00 398 14.6 21.8 100.0 . 901 33.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1824 Missing cases 901 PRE1884B Q15, first nomination pref in 1988 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BAKER 2.00 102 3.7 6.3 6.3 BUSH 3.00 444 16.3 27.3 33.6 CRANE, PHILIP 4.00 6 .2 .4 33.9 DOLE, ELIZABETH 5.00 11 .4 .7 34.6 DOLE, ROBERT 6.00 27 1.0 1.7 36.3 KEMP 7.00 128 4.7 7.9 44.1 LEHRMAN 8.00 2 .1 .1 44.3 WARNER 9.00 1 .0 .1 44.3 KIRKPATRICK 10.00 1 .0 .1 44.4 HELMS 11.00 7 .3 .4 44.8 OTHER REPUBLICAN 19.00 26 1.0 1.6 46.4 BIDEN 20.00 6 .2 .4 46.8 BRADLEY 21.00 19 .7 1.2 47.9 BUMPERS 22.00 6 .2 .4 48.3 CRANSTON 24.00 1 .0 .1 48.4 CUOMO 25.00 268 9.8 16.5 64.8 FERRARO 26.00 28 1.0 1.7 66.6 GLENN 28.00 14 .5 .9 67.4 HOLLINGS 29.00 2 .1 .1 67.5 JACKSON 31.00 28 1.0 1.7 69.3 KENNEDY 33.00 161 5.9 9.9 79.2 MCGOVERN 34.00 3 .1 .2 79.3 MONDALE 35.00 55 2.0 3.4 82.7 ROBB 37.00 7 .3 .4 83.2 HART 38.00 232 8.5 14.3 97.4 IACOCCA 40.00 7 .3 .4 97.8 OTHER DEMOCRAT 50.00 35 1.3 2.2 100.0 . 1092 40.1 Missing DK 98.00 6 .2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1627 Missing cases 1098 PRE2884B Q15, second nomination pref in 1988 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ANDERSON 1.00 1 .0 .1 .1 BAKER 2.00 210 7.7 15.5 15.6 BUSH 3.00 127 4.7 9.4 24.9 CRANE, PHILIP 4.00 3 .1 .2 25.1 DOLE, ELIZABETH 5.00 33 1.2 2.4 27.6 DOLE, ROBERT 6.00 68 2.5 5.0 32.6 KEMP 7.00 136 5.0 10.0 42.6 LEHRMAN 8.00 2 .1 .1 42.8 WARNER 9.00 3 .1 .2 43.0 KIRKPATRICK 10.00 10 .4 .7 43.7 HELMS 11.00 6 .2 .4 44.2 GINGRICH 12.00 3 .1 .2 44.4 OTHER REPUBLICAN 19.00 34 1.2 2.5 46.9 BIDEN 20.00 7 .3 .5 47.4 BRADLEY 21.00 24 .9 1.8 49.2 BUMPERS 22.00 6 .2 .4 49.6 CISNEROS 23.00 1 .0 .1 49.7 CRANSTON 24.00 1 .0 .1 49.8 CUOMO 25.00 129 4.7 9.5 59.3 FERRARO 26.00 67 2.5 4.9 64.2 GLENN 28.00 8 .3 .6 64.8 HOLLINGS 29.00 6 .2 .4 65.3 JACKSON 31.00 45 1.7 3.3 68.6 JORDAN 32.00 2 .1 .1 68.7 KENNEDY 33.00 118 4.3 8.7 77.4 MCGOVERN 34.00 7 .3 .5 77.9 MONDALE 35.00 48 1.8 3.5 81.5 ROBB 37.00 13 .5 1.0 82.4 HART 38.00 185 6.8 13.6 96.1 FEINSTEIN 39.00 1 .0 .1 96.2 IACOCCA 40.00 9 .3 .7 96.8 YOUNG 41.00 1 .0 .1 96.9 OTHER DEMOCRAT 50.00 42 1.5 3.1 100.0 . 1359 49.9 Missing DK 98.00 10 .4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1356 Missing cases 1369 PRE3884B Q15, third nomination pref in 1988 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ANDERSON 1.00 2 .1 .2 .2 BAKER 2.00 131 4.8 12.5 12.7 BUSH 3.00 70 2.6 6.7 19.4 CRANE, PHILIP 4.00 4 .1 .4 19.8 DOLE, ELIZABETH 5.00 40 1.5 3.8 23.6 DOLE, ROBERT 6.00 72 2.6 6.9 30.4 KEMP 7.00 103 3.8 9.8 40.3 LEHRMAN 8.00 3 .1 .3 40.6 WARNER 9.00 4 .1 .4 40.9 KIRKPATRICK 10.00 13 .5 1.2 42.2 HELMS 11.00 1 .0 .1 42.3 GINGRICH 12.00 2 .1 .2 42.5 OTHER REPUBLICAN 19.00 37 1.4 3.5 46.0 BIDEN 20.00 7 .3 .7 46.7 BRADLEY 21.00 18 .7 1.7 48.4 BUMPERS 22.00 4 .1 .4 48.8 CUOMO 25.00 75 2.8 7.2 55.9 FERRARO 26.00 66 2.4 6.3 62.2 GEPHART 27.00 2 .1 .2 62.4 GLENN 28.00 8 .3 .8 63.2 HOLLINGS 29.00 8 .3 .8 63.9 JACKSON 31.00 54 2.0 5.2 69.1 JORDAN 32.00 3 .1 .3 69.4 KENNEDY 33.00 97 3.6 9.3 78.6 MCGOVERN 34.00 9 .3 .9 79.5 MONDALE 35.00 40 1.5 3.8 83.3 MOYNAHAN 36.00 1 .0 .1 83.4 ROBB 37.00 19 .7 1.8 85.2 HART 38.00 99 3.6 9.4 94.7 FEINSTEIN 39.00 6 .2 .6 95.2 IACOCCA 40.00 7 .3 .7 95.9 OTHER DEMOCRAT 50.00 43 1.6 4.1 100.0 . 1662 61.0 Missing DK 98.00 15 .6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1048 Missing cases 1677 RANKHB4B Q16, rank Howard Baker Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1.00 183 6.7 10.9 10.9 2.00 395 14.5 23.4 34.3 3.00 346 12.7 20.5 54.8 4.00 193 7.1 11.5 66.3 5.00 220 8.1 13.1 79.3 6.00 177 6.5 10.5 89.9 7.00 106 3.9 6.3 96.1 8.00 65 2.4 3.9 100.0 . 1040 38.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1685 Missing cases 1040 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RANKGB4B Q16, rank George Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1.00 517 19.0 30.6 30.6 2.00 230 8.4 13.6 44.3 3.00 107 3.9 6.3 50.6 4.00 87 3.2 5.2 55.8 5.00 77 2.8 4.6 60.3 6.00 174 6.4 10.3 70.7 7.00 231 8.5 13.7 84.4 8.00 264 9.7 15.6 100.0 . 1038 38.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1687 Missing cases 1038 RANKED4B Q16, rank Elizabeth Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1.00 27 1.0 1.7 1.7 2.00 93 3.4 5.7 7.4 3.00 231 8.5 14.3 21.7 4.00 391 14.3 24.2 45.8 5.00 242 8.9 14.9 60.8 6.00 249 9.1 15.4 76.2 7.00 206 7.6 12.7 88.9 8.00 180 6.6 11.1 100.0 . 1106 40.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1619 Missing cases 1106 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RANKGF4B Q16, rank Geraldine Ferraro Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1.00 111 4.1 6.8 6.8 2.00 261 9.6 16.0 22.8 3.00 221 8.1 13.6 36.4 4.00 136 5.0 8.3 44.8 5.00 123 4.5 7.6 52.3 6.00 172 6.3 10.6 62.9 7.00 333 12.2 20.4 83.3 8.00 272 10.0 16.7 100.0 . 1096 40.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1629 Missing cases 1096 RANKGH4B Q16, rank Gary Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1.00 500 18.3 29.7 29.7 2.00 206 7.6 12.2 41.9 3.00 183 6.7 10.9 52.8 4.00 190 7.0 11.3 64.1 5.00 397 14.6 23.6 87.6 6.00 117 4.3 6.9 94.6 7.00 48 1.8 2.9 97.4 8.00 43 1.6 2.6 100.0 . 1041 38.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1684 Missing cases 1041 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RANKJJ4B Q16, rank Jesse Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1.00 69 2.5 4.3 4.3 2.00 101 3.7 6.2 10.5 3.00 148 5.4 9.1 19.6 4.00 227 8.3 14.0 33.6 5.00 130 4.8 8.0 41.6 6.00 158 5.8 9.7 51.4 7.00 254 9.3 15.7 67.0 8.00 535 19.6 33.0 100.0 . 1103 40.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1622 Missing cases 1103 RANKJK4B Q16, rank Jack Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1.00 181 6.6 11.1 11.1 2.00 172 6.3 10.6 21.7 3.00 213 7.8 13.1 34.8 4.00 227 8.3 14.0 48.8 5.00 186 6.8 11.4 60.2 6.00 150 5.5 9.2 69.5 7.00 173 6.3 10.6 80.1 8.00 323 11.9 19.9 100.0 . 1100 40.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1625 Missing cases 1100 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RANKWM4B Q16, rank Walter Mondale Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1.00 252 9.2 15.4 15.4 2.00 219 8.0 13.4 28.7 3.00 181 6.6 11.0 39.8 4.00 131 4.8 8.0 47.7 5.00 155 5.7 9.5 57.2 6.00 331 12.1 20.2 77.4 7.00 187 6.9 11.4 88.8 8.00 184 6.8 11.2 100.0 . 1085 39.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1640 Missing cases 1085 FIRREG4B Q17, 1984 first year registered? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1.00 31 1.1 1.6 1.6 NO 2.00 1915 70.3 98.4 100.0 . 779 28.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1946 Missing cases 779 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INTCAM4B Q18, How interested in 1984? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY INTERESTED 1.00 1512 55.5 77.3 77.3 SOMEWHAT INTERESTED 2.00 320 11.7 16.4 93.7 NOT MUCH INTERESTED 3.00 124 4.6 6.3 100.0 . 769 28.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1956 Missing cases 769 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVLEXP4B Q19, evaluate your 1984 experience Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY POSITIVE 1.00 635 23.3 34.2 34.2 MORE POS THAN NEG 2.00 713 26.2 38.4 72.6 NEUTRAL 3.00 286 10.5 15.4 88.0 MORE NEG THAN POS 4.00 178 6.5 9.6 97.6 VERY NEGATIVE 5.00 45 1.7 2.4 100.0 . 868 31.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1857 Missing cases 868 INV884B Q20, involved 1988 pres campaign Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY LIKELY 1.00 923 33.9 48.0 48.0 FAIRLY LIKELY 2.00 499 18.3 25.9 73.9 NOT VERY LIKELY 3.00 375 13.8 19.5 93.4 NOT AT ALL LIKELY 4.00 126 4.6 6.6 100.0 . 802 29.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1923 Missing cases 802 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INVST4B Q20, involved state/local elections Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY LIKELY 1.00 1014 37.2 52.9 52.9 FAIRLY LIKELY 2.00 507 18.6 26.4 79.3 NOT VERY LIKELY 3.00 299 11.0 15.6 94.9 NOT AT ALL LIKELY 4.00 98 3.6 5.1 100.0 . 807 29.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1918 Missing cases 807 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INVLOC4B Q20, involved local party organization Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY LIKELY 1.00 864 31.7 45.4 45.4 FAIRLY LIKELY 2.00 487 17.9 25.6 71.0 NOT VERY LIKELY 3.00 403 14.8 21.2 92.2 NOT AT ALL LIKELY 4.00 149 5.5 7.8 100.0 . 822 30.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1903 Missing cases 822 HOWACT4B Q21, How active next four years? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACTIVE ALL THE TIME 1.00 776 28.5 48.3 48.3 ACTIVE ALL ELECTIONS 2.00 252 9.2 15.7 64.0 ACTIVE WHEN CARE ABT 3.00 441 16.2 27.4 91.4 NOT ACTIVE 4.00 138 5.1 8.6 100.0 . 767 28.1 Missing NOT SURE 5.00 351 12.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1607 Missing cases 1118 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MON4B month survey completed Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 158 5.8 5.8 5.8 1 23 .8 .8 6.6 3 30 1.1 1.1 7.7 4 273 10.0 10.0 17.8 5 266 9.8 9.8 27.5 6 998 36.6 36.6 64.1 7 851 31.2 31.2 95.4 8 126 4.6 4.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 DAY4B day survey completed Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 158 5.8 5.8 5.8 0 30 1.1 1.1 6.9 05 23 .8 .8 7.7 1 111 4.1 4.1 11.8 10 85 3.1 3.1 14.9 11 102 3.7 3.7 18.7 12 107 3.9 3.9 22.6 13 62 2.3 2.3 24.9 14 29 1.1 1.1 25.9 15 42 1.5 1.5 27.5 16 111 4.1 4.1 31.6 17 53 1.9 1.9 33.5 18 196 7.2 7.2 40.7 19 44 1.6 1.6 42.3 2 181 6.6 6.6 49.0 20 75 2.8 2.8 51.7 21 91 3.3 3.3 55.0 22 69 2.5 2.5 57.6 23 39 1.4 1.4 59.0 24 26 1.0 1.0 60.0 25 78 2.9 2.9 62.8 26 34 1.2 1.2 64.1 27 93 3.4 3.4 67.5 28 64 2.3 2.3 69.8 29 91 3.3 3.3 73.2 3 77 2.8 2.8 76.0 30 50 1.8 1.8 77.8 31 41 1.5 1.5 79.3 4 136 5.0 5.0 84.3 5 76 2.8 2.8 87.1 6 85 3.1 3.1 90.2 7 36 1.3 1.3 91.6 8 40 1.5 1.5 93.0 9 190 7.0 7.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 RSPN84B 1984 B wave response Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO .00 692 25.4 25.4 25.4 YES 1.00 2033 74.6 74.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 *1988A* LIVED8A Q1, years lived in state Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0-5 years 1 22 .8 .8 .8 5-10 years 2 105 3.9 4.0 4.8 10-20 years 3 293 10.8 11.1 15.9 20+ years 4 2223 81.6 84.1 100.0 . 82 3.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2643 Missing cases 82 ACTIVE8A Q2, years active in party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0-5 years 1 442 16.2 17.1 17.1 5-10 years 2 602 22.1 23.3 40.4 10-20 years 3 676 24.8 26.2 66.6 20+ years 4 864 31.7 33.4 100.0 . 141 5.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2584 Missing cases 141 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PART888A Q3, 1988 part. in Pres. nom. process Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT PARTIC 0 953 35.0 35.0 35.0 PARTICIPANT 1 1772 65.0 65.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PART848A Q3, 1984 part. in Pres. nom. process Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT PARTIC 0 629 23.1 23.1 23.1 PARTICIPANT 1 2096 76.9 76.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 PART808A Q3, 1980 part. in Pres. nom. process Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT PARTIC 0 1104 40.5 40.5 40.5 PARTICIPANT 1 1621 59.5 59.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PART768A Q3, 1976 part. in Pres. nom. process Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT PARTIC 0 1621 59.5 59.5 59.5 PARTICIPANT 1 1104 40.5 40.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PART728A Q3, 1972 part. in Pres. nom. process Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT PARTIC 0 1959 71.9 71.9 71.9 PARTICIPANT 1 766 28.1 28.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 PART688A Q3, 1968 part. in Pres. nom. process Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT PARTIC 0 2152 79.0 79.0 79.0 PARTICIPANT 1 573 21.0 21.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PART648A Q3, 1964 part. in Pres. nom. process Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT PARTIC 0 2280 83.7 83.7 83.7 PARTICIPANT 1 445 16.3 16.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PART608A Q3, 1960 part. in Pres. nom. process Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT PARTIC 0 2371 87.0 87.0 87.0 PARTICIPANT 1 354 13.0 13.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 MEMB8A Q4, member position Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1411 51.8 51.8 51.8 CHECKED 1 1314 48.2 48.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CHAIR8A Q4, chair position Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2364 86.8 86.8 86.8 CHECKED 1 361 13.2 13.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LOCAL8A Q4, local position Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2476 90.9 90.9 90.9 CHECKED 1 249 9.1 9.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 STNAT8A Q4, state/nat'l position Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2689 98.7 98.7 98.7 CHECKED 1 36 1.3 1.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - APPT8A Q4, appointed position Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2484 91.2 91.2 91.2 CHECKED 1 241 8.8 8.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PAIDST8A Q4, paid position Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2605 95.6 95.6 95.6 CHECKED 1 120 4.4 4.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 DELST8A Q4, state delegate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1669 61.2 61.2 61.2 CHECKED 1 1056 38.8 38.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - VOTE848A Q5, Pres. vote in 1984 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent REAGAN 1 1165 42.8 44.6 44.6 MONDALE 2 1434 52.6 54.8 99.4 DID NOT VOTE 3 16 .6 .6 100.0 . 110 4.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2615 Missing cases 110 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOM84D8A Q6, Cand. pref for party nom 84, Dems Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MONDALE 1 835 30.6 61.3 61.3 HART 2 375 13.8 27.5 88.8 JACKSON 3 153 5.6 11.2 100.0 . 1186 43.5 Missing OTHER 4 176 6.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1363 Missing cases 1362 NOM84R8A Q6, Cand. pref for party nom 84, Reps Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent REAGAN 1 1030 37.8 100.0 100.0 . 1535 56.3 Missing OTHER 2 160 5.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1030 Missing cases 1695 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PTYID8A Q7, Describe party affiliation Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONG DEMOCRAT 1 929 34.1 35.1 35.1 WEAK DEMOCRAT 2 308 11.3 11.6 46.8 INDEPENDENT DEM 3 259 9.5 9.8 56.6 INDEPENDENT 4 46 1.7 1.7 58.3 INDEPENDENT REP 5 104 3.8 3.9 62.2 WEAK REPUBLICAN 6 213 7.8 8.1 70.3 STRONG REPUBLICAN 7 786 28.8 29.7 100.0 . 75 2.8 Missing OTHER 8 5 .2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2645 Missing cases 80 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ALWAYS8A Q8, Characterize party involvement Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent WORKS EVERY YEAR 1 1280 47.0 52.8 52.8 ONLY IF GOOD CAND 2 1143 41.9 47.2 100.0 . 302 11.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2423 Missing cases 302 LIBCON8A Q9, Describe political philosophy Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 103 3.8 4.0 4.0 LIBERAL 2 584 21.4 22.8 26.8 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 333 12.2 13.0 39.9 M-O-R 4 395 14.5 15.4 55.3 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 368 13.5 14.4 69.7 CONSERVATIVE 6 677 24.8 26.5 96.1 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 99 3.6 3.9 100.0 . 91 3.3 Missing NOT SURE 8 75 2.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2559 Missing cases 166 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CMPRES8A Q10, Pres campaign activity past 5 yrs Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY ACTIVE 1.00 578 21.2 22.9 22.9 FAIRLY 2.00 1172 43.0 46.3 69.2 NOT ACTIVE 3.00 779 28.6 30.8 100.0 . 196 7.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2529 Missing cases 196 CMSEN8A Q10, Sen. campaign activity past 5 yrs Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY ACTIVE 1 484 17.8 20.0 20.0 FAIRLY 2 1027 37.7 42.4 62.3 NOT ACTIVE 3 913 33.5 37.7 100.0 . 301 11.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2424 Missing cases 301 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CMHSE8A Q10, Hse. campaign activity past 5 yrs Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY ACTIVE 1 615 22.6 25.2 25.2 FAIRLY 2 974 35.7 39.9 65.1 NOT ACTIVE 3 852 31.3 34.9 100.0 . 284 10.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2441 Missing cases 284 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CMGOV8A Q10, Gov. campaign activity past 5 yrs Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY ACTIVE 1 634 23.3 25.9 25.9 FAIRLY 2 970 35.6 39.6 65.4 NOT ACTIVE 3 848 31.1 34.6 100.0 . 273 10.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2452 Missing cases 273 CMLOC8A Q10, Local campaign activity past 5 yrs Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY ACTIVE 1 822 30.2 32.8 32.8 FAIRLY 2 943 34.6 37.7 70.5 NOT ACTIVE 3 739 27.1 29.5 100.0 . 221 8.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2504 Missing cases 221 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTENT8A Q11, Attn. to newspapers for 1988 Pres Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent GREAT DEAL 1 762 28.0 28.8 28.8 QUITE A BIT 2 873 32.0 33.0 61.8 SOME 3 714 26.2 27.0 88.8 VERY LITTLE 4 245 9.0 9.3 98.1 NONE 5 50 1.8 1.9 100.0 . 81 3.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2644 Missing cases 81 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HELPPP8A Q12, part in local nom, help party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY IMP 1 1057 38.8 44.4 44.4 SOMEWHAT IMPT 2 839 30.8 35.3 79.7 NOT VERY IMPT 3 286 10.5 12.0 91.7 NOT AT ALL IMPT 4 198 7.3 8.3 100.0 . 345 12.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2380 Missing cases 345 GROUP8A Q12, part in local nom, rep groups Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY IMP 1 383 14.1 17.4 17.4 SOMEWHAT IMPT 2 528 19.4 23.9 41.3 NOT VERY IMPT 3 432 15.9 19.6 60.9 NOT AT ALL IMPT 4 864 31.7 39.1 100.0 . 518 19.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2207 Missing cases 518 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CAND8A Q12, part, in local nom, sppt cand. Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY IMP 1 1359 49.9 56.9 56.9 SOMEWHAT IMPT 2 785 28.8 32.9 89.8 NOT VERY IMPT 3 159 5.8 6.7 96.5 NOT AT ALL IMPT 4 84 3.1 3.5 100.0 . 338 12.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2387 Missing cases 338 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ISS8A Q12, party in local nom, rep. issues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY IMP 1 1575 57.8 64.1 64.1 SOMEWHAT IMPT 2 695 25.5 28.3 92.4 NOT VERY IMPT 3 123 4.5 5.0 97.4 NOT AT ALL IMPT 4 63 2.3 2.6 100.0 . 269 9.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2456 Missing cases 269 MIREAS8A Q13, best reason to part in nom process Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PARTY 1 582 21.4 23.1 23.1 GROUP 2 86 3.2 3.4 26.5 CANDIDATE 3 735 27.0 29.1 55.6 ISSUE 4 1119 41.1 44.4 100.0 . 203 7.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2522 Missing cases 203 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WINNOV8A Q14, reason to sppt cand,winner Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY IMP 1 951 34.9 40.1 40.1 SOMEWHAT IMPT 2 839 30.8 35.4 75.4 NOT VERY IMPT 3 310 11.4 13.1 88.5 NOT AT ALL IMPT 4 273 10.0 11.5 100.0 . 352 12.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2373 Missing cases 352 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PHIL8A Q14, reason to sppt cand,pol. phil Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY IMP 1 1661 61.0 67.6 67.6 SOMEWHAT IMPT 2 700 25.7 28.5 96.1 NOT VERY IMPT 3 68 2.5 2.8 98.8 NOT AT ALL IMPT 4 29 1.1 1.2 100.0 . 267 9.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2458 Missing cases 267 ISTOME8A Q14, reason to sppt cand,issues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY IMP 1 1252 45.9 51.8 51.8 SOMEWHAT IMPT 2 905 33.2 37.4 89.2 NOT VERY IMPT 3 204 7.5 8.4 97.6 NOT AT ALL IMPT 4 58 2.1 2.4 100.0 . 306 11.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2419 Missing cases 306 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WINNOM8A Q14, reason to sppt cand,win nom Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY IMP 1 854 31.3 36.0 36.0 SOMEWHAT IMPT 2 897 32.9 37.8 73.8 NOT VERY IMPT 3 374 13.7 15.8 89.5 NOT AT ALL IMPT 4 248 9.1 10.5 100.0 . 352 12.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2373 Missing cases 352 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MISUP8A Q15, best reason to sppt cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOV GE 1 572 21.0 22.1 22.1 POL PHIL 2 1178 43.2 45.5 67.5 ISSUES 3 624 22.9 24.1 91.6 WIN NOM 4 217 8.0 8.4 100.0 . 134 4.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2591 Missing cases 134 ABORT8A Q16, opinion, abortion Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 573 21.0 23.4 23.4 FAVOR 2 295 10.8 12.1 35.5 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 121 4.4 4.9 40.4 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 122 4.5 5.0 45.4 OPPOSE 6 425 15.6 17.4 62.8 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 909 33.4 37.2 100.0 . 109 4.0 Missing NOT SURE 4 171 6.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2445 Missing cases 280 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEFSP8A Q16, opinion, defense spending Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 321 11.8 13.3 13.3 FAVOR 2 406 14.9 16.8 30.1 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 211 7.7 8.7 38.9 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 217 8.0 9.0 47.9 OPPOSE 6 501 18.4 20.8 68.7 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 756 27.7 31.3 100.0 . 133 4.9 Missing NOT SURE 4 180 6.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2412 Missing cases 313 AFFACT8A Q16, opinion, affirm. action Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 329 12.1 14.5 14.5 FAVOR 2 520 19.1 22.8 37.3 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 490 18.0 21.5 58.8 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 318 11.7 14.0 72.8 OPPOSE 6 362 13.3 15.9 88.7 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 257 9.4 11.3 100.0 . 125 4.6 Missing NOT SURE 4 324 11.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2276 Missing cases 449 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BALBUD8A Q16, opinion, bal bud Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 803 29.5 35.0 35.0 FAVOR 2 571 21.0 24.9 59.9 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 279 10.2 12.2 72.1 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 125 4.6 5.5 77.6 OPPOSE 6 269 9.9 11.7 89.3 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 245 9.0 10.7 100.0 . 138 5.1 Missing NOT SURE 4 295 10.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2292 Missing cases 433 POLLUT8A Q16, opinion, regs on poll Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 796 29.2 33.5 33.5 FAVOR 2 796 29.2 33.5 67.0 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 428 15.7 18.0 85.0 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 164 6.0 6.9 91.9 OPPOSE 6 128 4.7 5.4 97.3 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 64 2.3 2.7 100.0 . 127 4.7 Missing NOT SURE 4 222 8.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2376 Missing cases 349 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTRA8A Q16, opinion, Contra sppt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 375 13.8 16.7 16.7 FAVOR 2 316 11.6 14.1 30.8 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 214 7.9 9.5 40.3 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 114 4.2 5.1 45.4 OPPOSE 6 358 13.1 15.9 61.3 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 868 31.9 38.7 100.0 . 137 5.0 Missing NOT SURE 4 343 12.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2245 Missing cases 480 FARMER8A Q16, opinion, Farm aid Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 314 11.5 14.8 14.8 FAVOR 2 433 15.9 20.4 35.1 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 446 16.4 21.0 56.1 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 361 13.2 17.0 73.1 OPPOSE 6 363 13.3 17.1 90.2 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 209 7.7 9.8 100.0 . 151 5.5 Missing NOT SURE 4 448 16.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2126 Missing cases 599 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TARIFF8A Q16, opinion, tariffs Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 459 16.8 20.1 20.1 FAVOR 2 467 17.1 20.5 40.6 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 366 13.4 16.0 56.6 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 265 9.7 11.6 68.2 OPPOSE 6 426 15.6 18.7 86.9 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 300 11.0 13.1 100.0 . 118 4.3 Missing NOT SURE 4 324 11.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2283 Missing cases 442 SDI8A Q16, opinion, SDI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 322 11.8 14.3 14.3 FAVOR 2 346 12.7 15.3 29.6 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 270 9.9 12.0 41.6 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 196 7.2 8.7 50.3 OPPOSE 6 340 12.5 15.1 65.3 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 782 28.7 34.7 100.0 . 120 4.4 Missing NOT SURE 4 349 12.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2256 Missing cases 469 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PRAYER8A Q16, opinion, prayer in school Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 604 22.2 25.1 25.1 FAVOR 2 414 15.2 17.2 42.4 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 266 9.8 11.1 53.4 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 121 4.4 5.0 58.5 OPPOSE 6 280 10.3 11.7 70.1 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 718 26.3 29.9 100.0 . 104 3.8 Missing NOT SURE 4 218 8.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2403 Missing cases 322 MIISS8A Q17, most impt. issue. this year Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ABORT 1 374 13.7 14.6 14.6 DEFENSE 2 397 14.6 15.6 30.2 AFFACT 3 120 4.4 4.7 34.9 BALBUDG 4 655 24.0 25.7 60.6 POLLUT 5 178 6.5 7.0 67.5 CONTRAS 6 244 9.0 9.6 77.1 FARMERS 7 82 3.0 3.2 80.3 TARIFFS 8 237 8.7 9.3 89.6 SDI 9 150 5.5 5.9 95.5 PRAYER 10 116 4.3 4.5 100.0 . 172 6.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2553 Missing cases 172 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCBB8A Q18, pol philosophy of Babbitt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 101 3.7 6.4 6.4 LIBERAL 2 604 22.2 38.3 44.8 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 408 15.0 25.9 70.7 M-O-R 4 306 11.2 19.4 90.1 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 99 3.6 6.3 96.4 CONSERVATIVE 6 50 1.8 3.2 99.6 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 7 .3 .4 100.0 . 347 12.7 Missing NOT SURE 8 803 29.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1575 Missing cases 1150 LCGB8A Q18, pol philosophy of Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 28 1.0 1.2 1.2 LIBERAL 2 59 2.2 2.5 3.7 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 65 2.4 2.8 6.5 M-O-R 4 260 9.5 11.1 17.7 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 414 15.2 17.8 35.4 CONSERVATIVE 6 1075 39.4 46.1 81.5 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 431 15.8 18.5 100.0 . 250 9.2 Missing NOT SURE 8 143 5.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2332 Missing cases 393 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCMC8A Q18, pol philosophy of Cuomo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 297 10.9 15.6 15.6 LIBERAL 2 974 35.7 51.2 66.9 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 362 13.3 19.0 85.9 M-O-R 4 187 6.9 9.8 95.7 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 48 1.8 2.5 98.3 CONSERVATIVE 6 24 .9 1.3 99.5 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 9 .3 .5 100.0 . 329 12.1 Missing NOT SURE 8 495 18.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1901 Missing cases 824 LCRD8A Q18, pol philosophy of Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 15 .6 .7 .7 LIBERAL 2 58 2.1 2.5 3.2 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 80 2.9 3.5 6.7 M-O-R 4 314 11.5 13.7 20.4 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 524 19.2 22.9 43.2 CONSERVATIVE 6 1063 39.0 46.4 89.6 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 239 8.8 10.4 100.0 . 274 10.1 Missing NOT SURE 8 158 5.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2293 Missing cases 432 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCMD8A Q18, pol philosophy of Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 276 10.1 13.5 13.5 LIBERAL 2 900 33.0 43.9 57.3 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 469 17.2 22.9 80.2 M-O-R 4 253 9.3 12.3 92.5 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 92 3.4 4.5 97.0 CONSERVATIVE 6 55 2.0 2.7 99.7 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 7 .3 .3 100.0 . 307 11.3 Missing NOT SURE 8 366 13.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2052 Missing cases 673 LCPD8A Q18, pol philosophy of DuPont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 18 .7 1.0 1.0 LIBERAL 2 65 2.4 3.7 4.7 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 94 3.4 5.4 10.1 M-O-R 4 160 5.9 9.1 19.2 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 247 9.1 14.1 33.2 CONSERVATIVE 6 601 22.1 34.2 67.4 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 572 21.0 32.6 100.0 . 337 12.4 Missing NOT SURE 8 631 23.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1757 Missing cases 968 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCRG8A Q18, pol philosophy of Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 175 6.4 8.8 8.8 LIBERAL 2 673 24.7 34.0 42.8 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 519 19.0 26.2 69.0 M-O-R 4 409 15.0 20.7 89.7 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 113 4.1 5.7 95.4 CONSERVATIVE 6 73 2.7 3.7 99.1 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 18 .7 .9 100.0 . 314 11.5 Missing NOT SURE 8 431 15.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1980 Missing cases 745 LCAG8A Q18, pol philosophy of Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 95 3.5 5.6 5.6 LIBERAL 2 388 14.2 22.7 28.3 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 426 15.6 25.0 53.3 M-O-R 4 409 15.0 24.0 77.3 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 243 8.9 14.2 91.5 CONSERVATIVE 6 114 4.2 6.7 98.2 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 31 1.1 1.8 100.0 . 350 12.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 669 24.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1706 Missing cases 1019 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCAH8A Q18, pol philosophy of Haig Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 37 1.4 1.8 1.8 LIBERAL 2 34 1.2 1.7 3.5 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 37 1.4 1.8 5.4 M-O-R 4 125 4.6 6.2 11.6 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 205 7.5 10.2 21.7 CONSERVATIVE 6 706 25.9 35.0 56.8 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 871 32.0 43.2 100.0 . 326 12.0 Missing NOT SURE 8 384 14.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2015 Missing cases 710 LCGH8A Q18, pol philosophy of Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 687 25.2 31.9 31.9 LIBERAL 2 890 32.7 41.3 73.1 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 309 11.3 14.3 87.5 M-O-R 4 193 7.1 9.0 96.4 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 42 1.5 1.9 98.4 CONSERVATIVE 6 26 1.0 1.2 99.6 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 9 .3 .4 100.0 . 309 11.3 Missing NOT SURE 8 260 9.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2156 Missing cases 569 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCJJ8A Q18, pol philosophy of Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 1195 43.9 52.0 52.0 LIBERAL 2 763 28.0 33.2 85.2 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 141 5.2 6.1 91.3 M-O-R 4 106 3.9 4.6 96.0 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 27 1.0 1.2 97.1 CONSERVATIVE 6 39 1.4 1.7 98.8 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 27 1.0 1.2 100.0 . 279 10.2 Missing NOT SURE 8 148 5.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2298 Missing cases 427 LCJK8A Q18, pol philosophy of Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 13 .5 .6 .6 LIBERAL 2 39 1.4 1.9 2.6 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 53 1.9 2.6 5.2 M-O-R 4 111 4.1 5.5 10.8 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 133 4.9 6.6 17.4 CONSERVATIVE 6 637 23.4 31.7 49.1 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 1022 37.5 50.9 100.0 . 327 12.0 Missing NOT SURE 8 390 14.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2008 Missing cases 717 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCRR8A Q18, pol philosophy of Reagan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 29 1.1 1.3 1.3 LIBERAL 2 30 1.1 1.3 2.6 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 23 .8 1.0 3.6 M-O-R 4 71 2.6 3.1 6.7 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 112 4.1 4.9 11.6 CONSERVATIVE 6 901 33.1 39.5 51.1 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 1114 40.9 48.9 100.0 . 267 9.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 178 6.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2280 Missing cases 445 LCPR8A Q18, pol philosophy of Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 22 .8 1.0 1.0 LIBERAL 2 41 1.5 1.9 3.0 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 48 1.8 2.3 5.3 M-O-R 4 95 3.5 4.5 9.7 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 136 5.0 6.4 16.2 CONSERVATIVE 6 409 15.0 19.4 35.5 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 1362 50.0 64.5 100.0 . 295 10.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 317 11.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2113 Missing cases 612 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCPS8A Q18, pol philosophy of Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 458 16.8 23.3 23.3 LIBERAL 2 759 27.9 38.5 61.8 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 348 12.8 17.7 79.5 M-O-R 4 243 8.9 12.3 91.8 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 89 3.3 4.5 96.3 CONSERVATIVE 6 55 2.0 2.8 99.1 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 17 .6 .9 100.0 . 336 12.3 Missing NOT SURE 8 420 15.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1969 Missing cases 756 LCAV8A Q18, pol philosophy of Am. Voter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 13 .5 .6 .6 LIBERAL 2 69 2.5 3.0 3.5 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 291 10.7 12.6 16.1 M-O-R 4 911 33.4 39.3 55.4 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 805 29.5 34.8 90.2 CONSERVATIVE 6 215 7.9 9.3 99.5 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 12 .4 .5 100.0 . 262 9.6 Missing NOT SURE 8 147 5.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2316 Missing cases 409 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCRP8A Q18, pol philosophy of Rep Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 25 .9 1.1 1.1 LIBERAL 2 36 1.3 1.5 2.6 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 21 .8 .9 3.5 M-O-R 4 93 3.4 3.9 7.4 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 414 15.2 17.5 24.9 CONSERVATIVE 6 1333 48.9 56.5 81.4 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 439 16.1 18.6 100.0 . 266 9.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 98 3.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2361 Missing cases 364 LCDP8A Q18, pol philosophy of Dem Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 317 11.6 13.0 13.0 LIBERAL 2 1176 43.2 48.4 61.4 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 615 22.6 25.3 86.7 M-O-R 4 217 8.0 8.9 95.6 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 47 1.7 1.9 97.6 CONSERVATIVE 6 37 1.4 1.5 99.1 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 22 .8 .9 100.0 . 235 8.6 Missing NOT SURE 8 59 2.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2431 Missing cases 294 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ACHBB8A Q19, achieve in govt, Babbitt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 74 2.7 5.2 5.2 ABOVE AVE 2 417 15.3 29.5 34.7 AVERAGE 3 648 23.8 45.8 80.6 BELOW AVE 4 165 6.1 11.7 92.2 POOR 5 110 4.0 7.8 100.0 . 310 11.4 Missing NOTSURE 6 1001 36.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1414 Missing cases 1311 ACHGB8A Q19, achieve in govt, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 321 11.8 13.2 13.2 ABOVE AVE 2 657 24.1 27.1 40.4 AVERAGE 3 612 22.5 25.3 65.6 BELOW AVE 4 333 12.2 13.7 79.4 POOR 5 500 18.3 20.6 100.0 . 216 7.9 Missing NOTSURE 6 86 3.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2423 Missing cases 302 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ACHRD8A Q19, achieve in govt, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 347 12.7 14.5 14.5 ABOVE AVE 2 1156 42.4 48.2 62.7 AVERAGE 3 648 23.8 27.0 89.7 BELOW AVE 4 139 5.1 5.8 95.5 POOR 5 109 4.0 4.5 100.0 . 227 8.3 Missing NOTSURE 6 99 3.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2399 Missing cases 326 ACHMD8A Q19, achieve in govt,Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 203 7.4 10.0 10.0 ABOVE AVE 2 842 30.9 41.6 51.6 AVERAGE 3 744 27.3 36.8 88.4 BELOW AVE 4 158 5.8 7.8 96.2 POOR 5 77 2.8 3.8 100.0 . 266 9.8 Missing NOTSURE 6 435 16.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2024 Missing cases 701 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ACHPD8A Q19, achieve in govt,Dupont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 70 2.6 4.6 4.6 ABOVE AVE 2 377 13.8 24.8 29.4 AVERAGE 3 604 22.2 39.7 69.1 BELOW AVE 4 279 10.2 18.4 87.5 POOR 5 190 7.0 12.5 100.0 . 303 11.1 Missing NOTSURE 6 902 33.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1520 Missing cases 1205 ACHRG8A Q19, achieve in govt, Gebhardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 96 3.5 5.2 5.2 ABOVE AVE 2 497 18.2 26.9 32.1 AVERAGE 3 916 33.6 49.6 81.7 BELOW AVE 4 235 8.6 12.7 94.5 POOR 5 102 3.7 5.5 100.0 . 294 10.8 Missing NOTSURE 6 585 21.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ACHAG8A Q19, achieve in govt, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 40 1.5 2.5 2.5 ABOVE AVE 2 309 11.3 19.2 21.6 AVERAGE 3 856 31.4 53.1 74.7 BELOW AVE 4 278 10.2 17.2 91.9 POOR 5 130 4.8 8.1 100.0 . 313 11.5 Missing NOTSURE 6 799 29.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1613 Missing cases 1112 ACHAH8A Q19, achieve in govt, Haig Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 75 2.8 3.5 3.5 ABOVE AVE 2 409 15.0 19.0 22.5 AVERAGE 3 644 23.6 29.9 52.4 BELOW AVE 4 479 17.6 22.2 74.6 POOR 5 546 20.0 25.4 100.0 . 277 10.2 Missing NOTSURE 6 295 10.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2153 Missing cases 572 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ACHGH8A Q19, achieve in govt, Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 39 1.4 1.8 1.8 ABOVE AVE 2 283 10.4 12.8 14.6 AVERAGE 3 722 26.5 32.8 47.4 BELOW AVE 4 443 16.3 20.1 67.5 POOR 5 716 26.3 32.5 100.0 . 280 10.3 Missing NOTSURE 6 242 8.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2203 Missing cases 522 ACHJJ8A Q19, achieve in govt, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 115 4.2 5.9 5.9 ABOVE AVE 2 302 11.1 15.5 21.4 AVERAGE 3 421 15.4 21.6 43.1 BELOW AVE 4 313 11.5 16.1 59.1 POOR 5 795 29.2 40.9 100.0 . 299 11.0 Missing NOTSURE 6 480 17.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1946 Missing cases 779 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ACHJK8A Q19, achieve in govt, Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 117 4.3 5.8 5.8 ABOVE AVE 2 510 18.7 25.3 31.1 AVERAGE 3 808 29.7 40.1 71.2 BELOW AVE 4 323 11.9 16.0 87.2 POOR 5 257 9.4 12.8 100.0 . 286 10.5 Missing NOTSURE 6 424 15.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2015 Missing cases 710 ACHPR8A Q19, achieve in govt,Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 35 1.3 2.0 2.0 ABOVE AVE 2 100 3.7 5.7 7.6 AVERAGE 3 214 7.9 12.1 19.8 BELOW AVE 4 276 10.1 15.6 35.4 POOR 5 1140 41.8 64.6 100.0 . 304 11.2 Missing NOTSURE 6 656 24.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1765 Missing cases 960 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ACHPS8A Q19, achieve in govt, Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 132 4.8 6.8 6.8 ABOVE AVE 2 661 24.3 34.1 40.9 AVERAGE 3 755 27.7 38.9 79.8 BELOW AVE 4 230 8.4 11.9 91.6 POOR 5 162 5.9 8.4 100.0 . 277 10.2 Missing NOTSURE 6 508 18.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1940 Missing cases 785 TVBB8A Q19, performance on TV, Babbitt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 34 1.2 2.0 2.0 ABOVE AVE 2 265 9.7 15.4 17.3 AVERAGE 3 798 29.3 46.3 63.6 BELOW AVE 4 342 12.6 19.8 83.5 POOR 5 285 10.5 16.5 100.0 . 333 12.2 Missing NOTSURE 6 668 24.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1724 Missing cases 1001 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TVGB8A Q19, performance on TV, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 181 6.6 7.5 7.5 ABOVE AVE 2 532 19.5 22.1 29.6 AVERAGE 3 782 28.7 32.5 62.1 BELOW AVE 4 399 14.6 16.6 78.7 POOR 5 514 18.9 21.3 100.0 . 258 9.5 Missing NOTSURE 6 59 2.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2408 Missing cases 317 TVRD8A Q19, performance on TV, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 164 6.0 6.9 6.9 ABOVE AVE 2 872 32.0 36.8 43.8 AVERAGE 3 971 35.6 41.0 84.8 BELOW AVE 4 225 8.3 9.5 94.3 POOR 5 136 5.0 5.7 100.0 . 268 9.8 Missing NOTSURE 6 89 3.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2368 Missing cases 357 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TVMD8A Q19, performance on TV, Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 142 5.2 6.7 6.7 ABOVE AVE 2 820 30.1 38.9 45.7 AVERAGE 3 923 33.9 43.8 89.5 BELOW AVE 4 148 5.4 7.0 96.5 POOR 5 73 2.7 3.5 100.0 . 302 11.1 Missing NOTSURE 6 317 11.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2106 Missing cases 619 TVPD8A Q19, performance on TV, DuPont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 58 2.1 3.4 3.4 ABOVE AVE 2 306 11.2 17.7 21.1 AVERAGE 3 755 27.7 43.7 64.8 BELOW AVE 4 332 12.2 19.2 84.0 POOR 5 276 10.1 16.0 100.0 . 339 12.4 Missing NOTSURE 6 659 24.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1727 Missing cases 998 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TVRG8A Q19, performance on TV, Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 143 5.2 7.0 7.0 ABOVE AVE 2 643 23.6 31.4 38.3 AVERAGE 3 950 34.9 46.3 84.6 BELOW AVE 4 223 8.2 10.9 95.5 POOR 5 92 3.4 4.5 100.0 . 309 11.3 Missing NOTSURE 6 365 13.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2051 Missing cases 674 TVAG8A Q19, performance on TV, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 65 2.4 3.7 3.7 ABOVE AVE 2 412 15.1 23.2 26.8 AVERAGE 3 809 29.7 45.5 72.3 BELOW AVE 4 298 10.9 16.8 89.1 POOR 5 194 7.1 10.9 100.0 . 337 12.4 Missing NOTSURE 6 610 22.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1778 Missing cases 947 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TVAH8A Q19, performance on TV, Haig Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 34 1.2 1.6 1.6 ABOVE AVE 2 241 8.8 11.2 12.8 AVERAGE 3 633 23.2 29.5 42.3 BELOW AVE 4 587 21.5 27.4 69.7 POOR 5 651 23.9 30.3 100.0 . 324 11.9 Missing NOTSURE 6 255 9.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2146 Missing cases 579 TVGH8A Q19, performance on TV, Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 78 2.9 3.4 3.4 ABOVE AVE 2 411 15.1 17.8 21.2 AVERAGE 3 715 26.2 31.0 52.2 BELOW AVE 4 426 15.6 18.5 70.7 POOR 5 676 24.8 29.3 100.0 . 308 11.3 Missing NOTSURE 6 111 4.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2306 Missing cases 419 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TVJJ8A Q19, performance on TV, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 521 19.1 21.9 21.9 ABOVE AVE 2 865 31.7 36.3 58.2 AVERAGE 3 572 21.0 24.0 82.2 BELOW AVE 4 187 6.9 7.9 90.1 POOR 5 237 8.7 9.9 100.0 . 257 9.4 Missing NOTSURE 6 86 3.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2382 Missing cases 343 TVJK8A Q19, performance on TV, Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 97 3.6 4.8 4.8 ABOVE AVE 2 456 16.7 22.3 27.1 AVERAGE 3 937 34.4 45.9 73.0 BELOW AVE 4 339 12.4 16.6 89.6 POOR 5 212 7.8 10.4 100.0 . 330 12.1 Missing NOTSURE 6 354 13.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2041 Missing cases 684 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TVPR8A Q19, performance on TV, Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 189 6.9 8.3 8.3 ABOVE AVE 2 572 21.0 25.2 33.6 AVERAGE 3 688 25.2 30.3 63.9 BELOW AVE 4 339 12.4 15.0 78.9 POOR 5 479 17.6 21.1 100.0 . 281 10.3 Missing NOTSURE 6 177 6.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2267 Missing cases 458 TVPS8A Q19, performance on TV, Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 77 2.8 3.7 3.7 ABOVE AVE 2 467 17.1 22.4 26.0 AVERAGE 3 977 35.9 46.8 72.8 BELOW AVE 4 341 12.5 16.3 89.1 POOR 5 227 8.3 10.9 100.0 . 302 11.1 Missing NOTSURE 6 334 12.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2089 Missing cases 636 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MORBB8A Q19, moral character, Babbitt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 201 7.4 13.6 13.6 ABOVE AVE 2 541 19.9 36.7 50.3 AVERAGE 3 651 23.9 44.2 94.5 BELOW AVE 4 41 1.5 2.8 97.3 POOR 5 40 1.5 2.7 100.0 . 338 12.4 Missing NOTSURE 6 913 33.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1474 Missing cases 1251 MORGB8A Q19, moral character, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 382 14.0 16.6 16.6 ABOVE AVE 2 581 21.3 25.3 42.0 AVERAGE 3 722 26.5 31.5 73.4 BELOW AVE 4 278 10.2 12.1 85.5 POOR 5 332 12.2 14.5 100.0 . 266 9.8 Missing NOTSURE 6 164 6.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2295 Missing cases 430 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MORRD8A Q19, moral character, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 332 12.2 14.5 14.5 ABOVE AVE 2 863 31.7 37.7 52.1 AVERAGE 3 876 32.1 38.2 90.4 BELOW AVE 4 137 5.0 6.0 96.3 POOR 5 84 3.1 3.7 100.0 . 267 9.8 Missing NOTSURE 6 166 6.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2292 Missing cases 433 MORMD8A Q19, moral character, Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 205 7.5 10.9 10.9 ABOVE AVE 2 748 27.4 39.9 50.8 AVERAGE 3 803 29.5 42.8 93.7 BELOW AVE 4 80 2.9 4.3 97.9 POOR 5 39 1.4 2.1 100.0 . 320 11.7 Missing NOTSURE 6 530 19.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1875 Missing cases 850 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MORPD8A Q19, moral character, DuPont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 161 5.9 10.5 10.5 ABOVE AVE 2 493 18.1 32.2 42.7 AVERAGE 3 722 26.5 47.2 89.9 BELOW AVE 4 89 3.3 5.8 95.7 POOR 5 66 2.4 4.3 100.0 . 339 12.4 Missing NOTSURE 6 855 31.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1531 Missing cases 1194 MORRG8A Q19, moral character, Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 186 6.8 10.4 10.4 ABOVE AVE 2 616 22.6 34.6 45.0 AVERAGE 3 857 31.4 48.1 93.1 BELOW AVE 4 79 2.9 4.4 97.6 POOR 5 43 1.6 2.4 100.0 . 322 11.8 Missing NOTSURE 6 622 22.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1781 Missing cases 944 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MORAG8A Q19, moral character, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 124 4.6 7.9 7.9 ABOVE AVE 2 486 17.8 30.8 38.7 AVERAGE 3 815 29.9 51.6 90.3 BELOW AVE 4 88 3.2 5.6 95.9 POOR 5 65 2.4 4.1 100.0 . 339 12.4 Missing NOTSURE 6 808 29.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1578 Missing cases 1147 MORAH8A Q19, moral character, Haig Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 120 4.4 6.2 6.2 ABOVE AVE 2 452 16.6 23.4 29.6 AVERAGE 3 833 30.6 43.1 72.6 BELOW AVE 4 286 10.5 14.8 87.4 POOR 5 243 8.9 12.6 100.0 . 331 12.1 Missing NOTSURE 6 460 16.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1934 Missing cases 791 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MORGH8A Q19, moral character, Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 19 .7 .8 .8 ABOVE AVE 2 51 1.9 2.2 3.0 AVERAGE 3 243 8.9 10.5 13.5 BELOW AVE 4 387 14.2 16.7 30.2 POOR 5 1615 59.3 69.8 100.0 . 283 10.4 Missing NOTSURE 6 127 4.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2315 Missing cases 410 MORJJ8A Q19, moral character, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 304 11.2 13.7 13.7 ABOVE AVE 2 649 23.8 29.1 42.8 AVERAGE 3 745 27.3 33.5 76.2 BELOW AVE 4 254 9.3 11.4 87.7 POOR 5 275 10.1 12.3 100.0 . 271 9.9 Missing NOTSURE 6 227 8.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2227 Missing cases 498 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MORJK8A Q19, moral character, Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 232 8.5 12.3 12.3 ABOVE AVE 2 598 21.9 31.6 43.9 AVERAGE 3 848 31.1 44.9 88.8 BELOW AVE 4 133 4.9 7.0 95.8 POOR 5 79 2.9 4.2 100.0 . 333 12.2 Missing NOTSURE 6 502 18.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1890 Missing cases 835 MORPR8A Q19, moral character, Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 266 9.8 12.2 12.2 ABOVE AVE 2 491 18.0 22.6 34.8 AVERAGE 3 672 24.7 30.9 65.7 BELOW AVE 4 311 11.4 14.3 80.0 POOR 5 434 15.9 20.0 100.0 . 282 10.3 Missing NOTSURE 6 269 9.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2174 Missing cases 551 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MORPS8A Q19, moral character, Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 337 12.4 17.9 17.9 ABOVE AVE 2 725 26.6 38.5 56.3 AVERAGE 3 720 26.4 38.2 94.5 BELOW AVE 4 62 2.3 3.3 97.8 POOR 5 41 1.5 2.2 100.0 . 317 11.6 Missing NOTSURE 6 523 19.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1885 Missing cases 840 FPOLBB8A Q19, knows for pol, Babbitt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 30 1.1 2.2 2.2 ABOVE AVE 2 174 6.4 12.5 14.7 AVERAGE 3 715 26.2 51.4 66.1 BELOW AVE 4 273 10.0 19.6 85.7 POOR 5 199 7.3 14.3 100.0 . 349 12.8 Missing NOTSURE 6 985 36.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1391 Missing cases 1334 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FPOLGB8A Q19, knows for pol, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 705 25.9 29.6 29.6 ABOVE AVE 2 974 35.7 41.0 70.6 AVERAGE 3 389 14.3 16.4 87.0 BELOW AVE 4 125 4.6 5.3 92.2 POOR 5 185 6.8 7.8 100.0 . 247 9.1 Missing NOTSURE 6 100 3.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2378 Missing cases 347 FPOLRD8A Q19, knows for pol, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 383 14.1 16.5 16.5 ABOVE AVE 2 1166 42.8 50.4 66.9 AVERAGE 3 622 22.8 26.9 93.8 BELOW AVE 4 88 3.2 3.8 97.6 POOR 5 56 2.1 2.4 100.0 . 261 9.6 Missing NOTSURE 6 149 5.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2315 Missing cases 410 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FPOLMD8A Q19, knows for pol, Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 54 2.0 2.9 2.9 ABOVE AVE 2 346 12.7 18.7 21.6 AVERAGE 3 964 35.4 52.1 73.8 BELOW AVE 4 323 11.9 17.5 91.2 POOR 5 162 5.9 8.8 100.0 . 311 11.4 Missing NOTSURE 6 565 20.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1849 Missing cases 876 FPOLPD8A Q19, knows for pol, DuPont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 24 .9 1.6 1.6 ABOVE AVE 2 198 7.3 13.1 14.7 AVERAGE 3 738 27.1 48.7 63.4 BELOW AVE 4 374 13.7 24.7 88.1 POOR 5 181 6.6 11.9 100.0 . 338 12.4 Missing NOTSURE 6 872 32.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1515 Missing cases 1210 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FPOLRG8A Q19, knows for pol, Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 78 2.9 4.3 4.3 ABOVE AVE 2 421 15.4 23.0 27.3 AVERAGE 3 936 34.3 51.2 78.5 BELOW AVE 4 253 9.3 13.8 92.4 POOR 5 139 5.1 7.6 100.0 . 319 11.7 Missing NOTSURE 6 579 21.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1827 Missing cases 898 FPOLAG8A Q19, knows for pol, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 54 2.0 3.3 3.3 ABOVE AVE 2 321 11.8 19.9 23.2 AVERAGE 3 841 30.9 52.0 75.2 BELOW AVE 4 272 10.0 16.8 92.0 POOR 5 129 4.7 8.0 100.0 . 334 12.3 Missing NOTSURE 6 774 28.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1617 Missing cases 1108 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FPOLAH8A Q19, knows for pol, Haig Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 509 18.7 22.8 22.8 ABOVE AVE 2 1043 38.3 46.8 69.6 AVERAGE 3 440 16.1 19.7 89.4 BELOW AVE 4 104 3.8 4.7 94.0 POOR 5 133 4.9 6.0 100.0 . 286 10.5 Missing NOTSURE 6 210 7.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2229 Missing cases 496 FPOLGH8A Q19, knows for pol, Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 82 3.0 4.0 4.0 ABOVE AVE 2 409 15.0 19.7 23.7 AVERAGE 3 828 30.4 39.9 63.6 BELOW AVE 4 308 11.3 14.9 78.4 POOR 5 447 16.4 21.6 100.0 . 303 11.1 Missing NOTSURE 6 348 12.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2074 Missing cases 651 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FPOLJJ8A Q19, knows for pol, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 165 6.1 7.5 7.5 ABOVE AVE 2 461 16.9 20.8 28.3 AVERAGE 3 639 23.4 28.9 57.2 BELOW AVE 4 415 15.2 18.8 75.9 POOR 5 532 19.5 24.1 100.0 . 278 10.2 Missing NOTSURE 6 235 8.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2212 Missing cases 513 FPOLJK8A Q19, knows for pol, Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 127 4.7 6.6 6.6 ABOVE AVE 2 458 16.8 24.0 30.6 AVERAGE 3 900 33.0 47.1 77.7 BELOW AVE 4 281 10.3 14.7 92.5 POOR 5 144 5.3 7.5 100.0 . 323 11.9 Missing NOTSURE 6 492 18.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1910 Missing cases 815 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FPOLPR8A Q19, knows for pol, Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 62 2.3 3.0 3.0 ABOVE AVE 2 154 5.7 7.5 10.5 AVERAGE 3 405 14.9 19.8 30.3 BELOW AVE 4 492 18.1 24.0 54.3 POOR 5 936 34.3 45.7 100.0 . 288 10.6 Missing NOTSURE 6 388 14.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2049 Missing cases 676 FPOLPS8A Q19, knows for pol, Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 108 4.0 5.9 5.9 ABOVE AVE 2 582 21.4 31.7 37.6 AVERAGE 3 846 31.0 46.1 83.7 BELOW AVE 4 188 6.9 10.2 94.0 POOR 5 111 4.1 6.0 100.0 . 318 11.7 Missing NOTSURE 6 572 21.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1835 Missing cases 890 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALBB8A Q19, Overall Eval, Babbitt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 79 2.9 4.6 4.6 ABOVE AVE 2 379 13.9 22.0 26.6 AVERAGE 3 763 28.0 44.3 70.9 BELOW AVE 4 300 11.0 17.4 88.3 POOR 5 202 7.4 11.7 100.0 . 344 12.6 Missing NOTSURE 6 658 24.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1723 Missing cases 1002 EVALGB8A Q19, Overall Eval, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 370 13.6 15.3 15.3 ABOVE AVE 2 607 22.3 25.2 40.5 AVERAGE 3 579 21.2 24.0 64.5 BELOW AVE 4 346 12.7 14.4 78.9 POOR 5 509 18.7 21.1 100.0 . 261 9.6 Missing NOTSURE 6 53 1.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2411 Missing cases 314 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALMC8A Q19, Overall Eval, Cuomo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 290 10.6 14.9 14.9 ABOVE AVE 2 657 24.1 33.7 48.6 AVERAGE 3 623 22.9 32.0 80.6 BELOW AVE 4 194 7.1 10.0 90.5 POOR 5 185 6.8 9.5 100.0 . 330 12.1 Missing NOTSURE 6 446 16.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1949 Missing cases 776 EVALRD8A Q19, Overall Eval, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 284 10.4 11.9 11.9 ABOVE AVE 2 1032 37.9 43.4 55.3 AVERAGE 3 740 27.2 31.1 86.4 BELOW AVE 4 195 7.2 8.2 94.6 POOR 5 128 4.7 5.4 100.0 . 285 10.5 Missing NOTSURE 6 61 2.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2379 Missing cases 346 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALMD8A Q19, Overall Eval, Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 172 6.3 8.1 8.1 ABOVE AVE 2 742 27.2 35.1 43.3 AVERAGE 3 858 31.5 40.6 83.9 BELOW AVE 4 229 8.4 10.8 94.8 POOR 5 110 4.0 5.2 100.0 . 314 11.5 Missing NOTSURE 6 300 11.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2111 Missing cases 614 EVALPD8A Q19, Overall Eval, DuPont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 67 2.5 3.8 3.8 ABOVE AVE 2 299 11.0 17.0 20.8 AVERAGE 3 697 25.6 39.6 60.3 BELOW AVE 4 391 14.3 22.2 82.5 POOR 5 308 11.3 17.5 100.0 . 351 12.9 Missing NOTSURE 6 612 22.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1762 Missing cases 963 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALRG8A Q19, Overall Eval, Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 127 4.7 6.2 6.2 ABOVE AVE 2 520 19.1 25.5 31.8 AVERAGE 3 897 32.9 44.1 75.8 BELOW AVE 4 325 11.9 16.0 91.8 POOR 5 167 6.1 8.2 100.0 . 330 12.1 Missing NOTSURE 6 359 13.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2036 Missing cases 689 EVALAG8A Q19, Overall Eval, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 59 2.2 3.2 3.2 ABOVE AVE 2 327 12.0 18.0 21.2 AVERAGE 3 854 31.3 47.0 68.2 BELOW AVE 4 388 14.2 21.3 89.5 POOR 5 190 7.0 10.5 100.0 . 357 13.1 Missing NOTSURE 6 550 20.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1818 Missing cases 907 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALAH8A Q19, Overall Eval, Haig Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 57 2.1 2.6 2.6 ABOVE AVE 2 272 10.0 12.3 14.9 AVERAGE 3 672 24.7 30.4 45.3 BELOW AVE 4 572 21.0 25.9 71.2 POOR 5 635 23.3 28.8 100.0 . 335 12.3 Missing NOTSURE 6 182 6.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2208 Missing cases 517 EVALGH8A Q19, Overall Eval, Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 33 1.2 1.4 1.4 ABOVE AVE 2 165 6.1 7.1 8.5 AVERAGE 3 402 14.8 17.3 25.9 BELOW AVE 4 514 18.9 22.1 48.0 POOR 5 1207 44.3 52.0 100.0 . 305 11.2 Missing NOTSURE 6 99 3.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2321 Missing cases 404 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALJJ8A Q19, Overall Eval, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 189 6.9 8.0 8.0 ABOVE AVE 2 545 20.0 23.2 31.2 AVERAGE 3 645 23.7 27.4 58.6 BELOW AVE 4 409 15.0 17.4 76.0 POOR 5 564 20.7 24.0 100.0 . 286 10.5 Missing NOTSURE 6 87 3.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2352 Missing cases 373 EVALJK8A Q19, Overall Eval, Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 136 5.0 6.5 6.5 ABOVE AVE 2 436 16.0 20.9 27.4 AVERAGE 3 799 29.3 38.2 65.6 BELOW AVE 4 370 13.6 17.7 83.3 POOR 5 348 12.8 16.7 100.0 . 351 12.9 Missing NOTSURE 6 285 10.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2089 Missing cases 636 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALRR8A Q19, Overall Eval, Reagan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 486 17.8 20.4 20.4 ABOVE AVE 2 434 15.9 18.2 38.7 AVERAGE 3 357 13.1 15.0 53.7 BELOW AVE 4 253 9.3 10.6 64.3 POOR 5 850 31.2 35.7 100.0 . 290 10.6 Missing NOTSURE 6 55 2.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2380 Missing cases 345 EVALPR8A Q19, Overall Eval, Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 67 2.5 3.0 3.0 ABOVE AVE 2 213 7.8 9.4 12.4 AVERAGE 3 487 17.9 21.6 34.0 BELOW AVE 4 455 16.7 20.2 54.2 POOR 5 1032 37.9 45.8 100.0 . 293 10.8 Missing NOTSURE 6 178 6.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2254 Missing cases 471 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALPS8A Q19, Overall Eval, Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 148 5.4 7.2 7.2 ABOVE AVE 2 628 23.0 30.6 37.8 AVERAGE 3 810 29.7 39.5 77.3 BELOW AVE 4 271 9.9 13.2 90.5 POOR 5 195 7.2 9.5 100.0 . 332 12.2 Missing NOTSURE 6 341 12.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2052 Missing cases 673 MIQUAL8A Q20, Most impt quality Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACHIEVE IN GOV 1 1454 53.4 59.6 59.6 TV PERF 2 15 .6 .6 60.2 MORAL CHAR 3 659 24.2 27.0 87.2 KNOWL FOR POL 4 313 11.5 12.8 100.0 . 284 10.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2441 Missing cases 284 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - METBB8A Q21, met personally, Babbitt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2626 96.4 96.4 96.4 CHECKED 1 99 3.6 3.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RALBB8A Q21, attended rally, Babbitt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2606 95.6 95.6 95.6 CHECKED 1 119 4.4 4.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 CONTBB8A Q21, contacted, Babbitt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2423 88.9 88.9 88.9 CHECKED 1 302 11.1 11.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MAILBB8A Q21, received mail, Babbitt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2189 80.3 80.3 80.3 CHECKED 1 536 19.7 19.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ADBB8A Q21, saw ad, Babbitt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1062 39.0 39.0 39.0 CHECKED 1 1663 61.0 61.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 METGB8A Q21, met personally, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2367 86.9 86.9 86.9 CHECKED 1 358 13.1 13.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RALGB8A Q21, attended rally, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2303 84.5 84.5 84.5 CHECKED 1 422 15.5 15.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTGB8A Q21, contacted, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2287 83.9 83.9 83.9 CHECKED 1 438 16.1 16.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 MAILGB8A Q21, received mail, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1926 70.7 70.7 70.7 CHECKED 1 799 29.3 29.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ADGB8A Q21, saw ad, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1144 42.0 42.0 42.0 CHECKED 1 1581 58.0 58.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - METRD8A Q21, met personally, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2436 89.4 89.4 89.4 CHECKED 1 289 10.6 10.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 RALRD8A Q21, attended rally, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2419 88.8 88.8 88.8 CHECKED 1 306 11.2 11.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTRD8A Q21, contacted, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2350 86.2 86.2 86.2 CHECKED 1 375 13.8 13.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MAILRD8A Q21, received mail, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1946 71.4 71.4 71.4 CHECKED 1 779 28.6 28.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 ADRD8A Q21, saw ad, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1131 41.5 41.5 41.5 CHECKED 1 1594 58.5 58.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - METMD8A Q21, met personally, Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2608 95.7 95.7 95.7 CHECKED 1 117 4.3 4.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RALMD8A Q21, attended rally, Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2553 93.7 93.7 93.7 CHECKED 1 172 6.3 6.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 CONTMD8A Q21, contacted, Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2291 84.1 84.1 84.1 CHECKED 1 434 15.9 15.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MAILMD8A Q21, received mail, Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2116 77.7 77.7 77.7 CHECKED 1 609 22.3 22.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ADMD8A Q21, saw ad, Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1050 38.5 38.5 38.5 CHECKED 1 1675 61.5 61.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 METPD8A Q21, met personally, DuPont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2633 96.6 96.6 96.6 CHECKED 1 92 3.4 3.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RALPD8A Q21, attended rally, DuPont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2609 95.7 95.7 95.7 CHECKED 1 116 4.3 4.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTPD8A Q21, contacted, DuPont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2551 93.6 93.6 93.6 CHECKED 1 174 6.4 6.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 MAILPD8A Q21, received mail, DuPont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2353 86.3 86.3 86.3 CHECKED 1 372 13.7 13.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ADPD8A Q21, saw ad, DuPont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1112 40.8 40.8 40.8 CHECKED 1 1613 59.2 59.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - METRG8A Q21, met personally, Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2612 95.9 95.9 95.9 CHECKED 1 113 4.1 4.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 RALRG8A Q21, attended rally, Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2558 93.9 93.9 93.9 CHECKED 1 167 6.1 6.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTRG8A Q21, contacted, Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2360 86.6 86.6 86.6 CHECKED 1 365 13.4 13.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MAILRG8A Q21, received mail, Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2155 79.1 79.1 79.1 CHECKED 1 570 20.9 20.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 ADRG8A Q21, saw ad, Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1067 39.2 39.2 39.2 CHECKED 1 1658 60.8 60.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - METAG8A Q21, met personally, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2671 98.0 98.0 98.0 CHECKED 1 54 2.0 2.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RALAG8A Q21, attended rally, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2635 96.7 96.7 96.7 CHECKED 1 90 3.3 3.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 CONTAG8A Q21, contacted, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2608 95.7 95.7 95.7 CHECKED 1 117 4.3 4.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MAILAG8A Q21, received mail, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2463 90.4 90.4 90.4 CHECKED 1 262 9.6 9.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ADAG8A Q21, saw ad, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1146 42.1 42.1 42.1 CHECKED 1 1579 57.9 57.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 METAH8A Q21, met personally, Haig Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2622 96.2 96.2 96.2 CHECKED 1 103 3.8 3.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RALAH8A Q21, attended rally, Haig Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2607 95.7 95.7 95.7 CHECKED 1 118 4.3 4.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTAH8A Q21, contacted, Haig Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2677 98.2 98.2 98.2 CHECKED 1 48 1.8 1.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 MAILAH8A Q21, received mail, Haig Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2513 92.2 92.2 92.2 CHECKED 1 212 7.8 7.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ADAH8A Q21, saw ad, Haig Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1149 42.2 42.2 42.2 CHECKED 1 1576 57.8 57.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - METGH8A Q21, met personally, Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2633 96.6 96.6 96.6 CHECKED 1 92 3.4 3.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 RALGH8A Q21, attended rally, Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2614 95.9 95.9 95.9 CHECKED 1 111 4.1 4.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTGH8A Q21, contacted, Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2595 95.2 95.2 95.2 CHECKED 1 130 4.8 4.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MAILGH8A Q21, received mail, Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2327 85.4 85.4 85.4 CHECKED 1 398 14.6 14.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 ADGH8A Q21, saw ad, Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1001 36.7 36.7 36.7 CHECKED 1 1724 63.3 63.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - METJJ8A Q21, met personally, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2591 95.1 95.1 95.1 CHECKED 1 134 4.9 4.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RALJJ8A Q21, attended rally, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2503 91.9 91.9 91.9 CHECKED 1 222 8.1 8.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 CONTJJ8A Q21, contacted, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2567 94.2 94.2 94.2 CHECKED 1 158 5.8 5.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MAILJJ8A Q21, received mail, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2406 88.3 88.3 88.3 CHECKED 1 319 11.7 11.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ADJJ8A Q21, saw ad, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1049 38.5 38.5 38.5 CHECKED 1 1676 61.5 61.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 METJK8A Q21, met personally, Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2496 91.6 91.6 91.6 CHECKED 1 229 8.4 8.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RALJK8A Q21, attended rally, Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2464 90.4 90.4 90.4 CHECKED 1 261 9.6 9.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTJK8A Q21, contacted, Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2476 90.9 90.9 90.9 CHECKED 1 249 9.1 9.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 MAILJK8A Q21, received mail, Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2099 77.0 77.0 77.0 CHECKED 1 626 23.0 23.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ADJK8A Q21, saw ad, Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1156 42.4 42.4 42.4 CHECKED 1 1569 57.6 57.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - METPR8A Q21, met personally, Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2609 95.7 95.7 95.7 CHECKED 1 116 4.3 4.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 RALPR8A Q21, attended rally, Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2561 94.0 94.0 94.0 CHECKED 1 164 6.0 6.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTPR8A Q21, contacted, Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2495 91.6 91.6 91.6 CHECKED 1 230 8.4 8.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MAILPR8A Q21, received mail, Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2124 77.9 77.9 77.9 CHECKED 1 601 22.1 22.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 ADPR8A Q21, saw ad, Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1035 38.0 38.0 38.0 CHECKED 1 1690 62.0 62.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - METPS8A Q21, met personally, Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2603 95.5 95.5 95.5 CHECKED 1 122 4.5 4.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RALPS8A Q21, attended rally, Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2580 94.7 94.7 94.7 CHECKED 1 145 5.3 5.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 CONTPS8A Q21, contacted, Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2374 87.1 87.1 87.1 CHECKED 1 351 12.9 12.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MAILPS8A Q21, received mail, Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2144 78.7 78.7 78.7 CHECKED 1 581 21.3 21.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ADPS8A Q21, saw ad, Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1066 39.1 39.1 39.1 CHECKED 1 1659 60.9 60.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 RANKBB8A Q22, Rank Dem Pref, Babbitt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST 1 126 4.6 8.6 8.6 SECOND 2 146 5.4 10.0 18.6 THIRD 3 225 8.3 15.3 33.9 FOURTH 4 260 9.5 17.7 51.6 FIFTH 5 297 10.9 20.3 71.9 SIXTH 6 254 9.3 17.3 89.2 SEVENTH 7 158 5.8 10.8 100.0 . 1259 46.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1466 Missing cases 1259 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RANKMD8A Q22, Rank Dem Pref, Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST 1 396 14.5 26.0 26.0 SECOND 2 431 15.8 28.3 54.4 THIRD 3 283 10.4 18.6 73.0 FOURTH 4 212 7.8 13.9 86.9 FIFTH 5 104 3.8 6.8 93.8 SIXTH 6 58 2.1 3.8 97.6 SEVENTH 7 37 1.4 2.4 100.0 . 1204 44.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1521 Missing cases 1204 RANKRG8A Q22, Rank Dem Pref, Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST 1 279 10.2 18.4 18.4 SECOND 2 284 10.4 18.8 37.2 THIRD 3 284 10.4 18.8 55.9 FOURTH 4 256 9.4 16.9 72.9 FIFTH 5 229 8.4 15.1 88.0 SIXTH 6 136 5.0 9.0 97.0 SEVENTH 7 46 1.7 3.0 100.0 . 1211 44.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1514 Missing cases 1211 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RANKAG8A Q22, Rank Dem Pref, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST 1 176 6.5 11.9 11.9 SECOND 2 118 4.3 8.0 19.9 THIRD 3 157 5.8 10.6 30.5 FOURTH 4 167 6.1 11.3 41.8 FIFTH 5 287 10.5 19.4 61.2 SIXTH 6 327 12.0 22.1 83.4 SEVENTH 7 246 9.0 16.6 100.0 . 1247 45.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1478 Missing cases 1247 RANKGH8A Q22, Rank Dem Pref, Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST 1 85 3.1 5.7 5.7 SECOND 2 98 3.6 6.5 12.2 THIRD 3 77 2.8 5.1 17.3 FOURTH 4 100 3.7 6.6 23.9 FIFTH 5 134 4.9 8.9 32.8 SIXTH 6 238 8.7 15.8 48.7 SEVENTH 7 772 28.3 51.3 100.0 . 1221 44.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1504 Missing cases 1221 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RANKJJ8A Q22, Rank Dem Pref, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST 1 244 9.0 15.9 15.9 SECOND 2 150 5.5 9.8 25.7 THIRD 3 208 7.6 13.6 39.3 FOURTH 4 183 6.7 12.0 51.3 FIFTH 5 198 7.3 12.9 64.2 SIXTH 6 280 10.3 18.3 82.5 SEVENTH 7 268 9.8 17.5 100.0 . 1194 43.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1531 Missing cases 1194 RANKPS8A Q22, Rank Dem Pref, Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST 1 301 11.0 19.9 19.9 SECOND 2 315 11.6 20.8 40.7 THIRD 3 268 9.8 17.7 58.5 FOURTH 4 256 9.4 16.9 75.4 FIFTH 5 159 5.8 10.5 85.9 SIXTH 6 116 4.3 7.7 93.6 SEVENTH 7 97 3.6 6.4 100.0 . 1213 44.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1512 Missing cases 1213 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RANKGB8A Q22, Rank Rep Pref, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST 1 607 22.3 36.5 36.5 SECOND 2 405 14.9 24.4 60.9 THIRD 3 224 8.2 13.5 74.4 FOURTH 4 142 5.2 8.5 82.9 FIFTH 5 106 3.9 6.4 89.3 SIXTH 6 178 6.5 10.7 100.0 . 1063 39.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1662 Missing cases 1063 RANKRD8A Q22, Rank Rep Pref, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST 1 659 24.2 39.7 39.7 SECOND 2 565 20.7 34.0 73.7 THIRD 3 192 7.0 11.6 85.3 FOURTH 4 129 4.7 7.8 93.1 FIFTH 5 50 1.8 3.0 96.1 SIXTH 6 65 2.4 3.9 100.0 . 1065 39.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1660 Missing cases 1065 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RANKPD8A Q22, Rank Rep Pref, DuPont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST 1 86 3.2 5.5 5.5 SECOND 2 185 6.8 11.8 17.3 THIRD 3 368 13.5 23.5 40.8 FOURTH 4 420 15.4 26.8 67.6 FIFTH 5 298 10.9 19.0 86.6 SIXTH 6 210 7.7 13.4 100.0 . 1158 42.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1567 Missing cases 1158 RANKAH8A Q22, Rank Rep Pref, Haig Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST 1 29 1.1 1.8 1.8 SECOND 2 68 2.5 4.3 6.2 THIRD 3 189 6.9 12.0 18.2 FOURTH 4 315 11.6 20.1 38.3 FIFTH 5 551 20.2 35.1 73.4 SIXTH 6 417 15.3 26.6 100.0 . 1156 42.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1569 Missing cases 1156 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RANKJK8A Q22, Rank Rep Pref, Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST 1 204 7.5 12.8 12.8 SECOND 2 264 9.7 16.5 29.3 THIRD 3 455 16.7 28.5 57.7 FOURTH 4 345 12.7 21.6 79.3 FIFTH 5 233 8.6 14.6 93.9 SIXTH 6 98 3.6 6.1 100.0 . 1126 41.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1599 Missing cases 1126 RANKPR8A Q22, Rank Rep Pref, Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST 1 79 2.9 4.9 4.9 SECOND 2 106 3.9 6.6 11.5 THIRD 3 113 4.1 7.0 18.5 FOURTH 4 160 5.9 10.0 28.5 FIFTH 5 273 10.0 17.0 45.5 SIXTH 6 877 32.2 54.5 100.0 . 1117 41.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1608 Missing cases 1117 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOMBB8A Q23, chance of nom, Babbitt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 11 .4 .5 .5 PROBABLY WIN 2 40 1.5 1.9 2.5 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 85 3.1 4.1 6.5 TOSSUP 4 238 8.7 11.4 18.0 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 341 12.5 16.4 34.4 PROBABLY LOSE 6 568 20.8 27.3 61.7 CERTAIN LOSE 7 797 29.2 38.3 100.0 . 259 9.5 Missing NOT SURE 8 386 14.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2080 Missing cases 645 NOMMD8A Q23, chance of nom, Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 132 4.8 5.8 5.8 PROBABLY WIN 2 417 15.3 18.3 24.1 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 570 20.9 25.0 49.1 TOSSUP 4 586 21.5 25.7 74.7 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 243 8.9 10.7 85.4 PROBABLY LOSE 6 239 8.8 10.5 95.9 CERTAIN LOSE 7 94 3.4 4.1 100.0 . 241 8.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 203 7.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2281 Missing cases 444 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOMRG8A Q23, chance of nom, Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 94 3.4 4.2 4.2 PROBABLY WIN 2 203 7.4 9.0 13.1 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 462 17.0 20.4 33.6 TOSSUP 4 650 23.9 28.8 62.3 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 379 13.9 16.8 79.1 PROBABLY LOSE 6 325 11.9 14.4 93.5 CERTAIN LOSE 7 147 5.4 6.5 100.0 . 260 9.5 Missing NOT SURE 8 205 7.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2260 Missing cases 465 NOMAG8A Q23, chance of nom, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 29 1.1 1.3 1.3 PROBABLY WIN 2 53 1.9 2.5 3.8 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 184 6.8 8.5 12.3 TOSSUP 4 449 16.5 20.8 33.1 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 490 18.0 22.7 55.7 PROBABLY LOSE 6 526 19.3 24.3 80.0 CERTAIN LOSE 7 432 15.9 20.0 100.0 . 274 10.1 Missing NOT SURE 8 288 10.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2163 Missing cases 562 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOMGH8A Q23, chance of nom, Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 22 .8 .9 .9 PROBABLY WIN 2 40 1.5 1.7 2.6 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 64 2.3 2.7 5.3 TOSSUP 4 140 5.1 5.9 11.3 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 231 8.5 9.8 21.1 PROBABLY LOSE 6 368 13.5 15.6 36.7 CERTAIN LOSE 7 1494 54.8 63.3 100.0 . 255 9.4 Missing NOT SURE 8 111 4.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2359 Missing cases 366 NOMJJ8A Q23, chance of nom, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 38 1.4 1.6 1.6 PROBABLY WIN 2 65 2.4 2.7 4.3 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 120 4.4 5.0 9.3 TOSSUP 4 284 10.4 11.9 21.2 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 443 16.3 18.5 39.7 PROBABLY LOSE 6 538 19.7 22.5 62.2 CERTAIN LOSE 7 906 33.2 37.8 100.0 . 240 8.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 91 3.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2394 Missing cases 331 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOMPS8A Q23, chance of nom, Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 57 2.1 2.6 2.6 PROBABLY WIN 2 132 4.8 6.0 8.5 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 310 11.4 14.0 22.6 TOSSUP 4 562 20.6 25.4 48.0 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 390 14.3 17.6 65.6 PROBABLY LOSE 6 428 15.7 19.3 84.9 CERTAIN LOSE 7 333 12.2 15.1 100.0 . 292 10.7 Missing NOT SURE 8 221 8.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2212 Missing cases 513 NOMGB8A Q23, chance of nom, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 403 14.8 16.6 16.6 PROBABLY WIN 2 828 30.4 34.2 50.8 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 436 16.0 18.0 68.9 TOSSUP 4 414 15.2 17.1 86.0 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 154 5.7 6.4 92.3 PROBABLY LOSE 6 96 3.5 4.0 96.3 CERTAIN LOSE 7 90 3.3 3.7 100.0 . 228 8.4 Missing NOT SURE 8 76 2.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2421 Missing cases 304 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOMRD8A Q23, chance of nom, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 146 5.4 6.1 6.1 PROBABLY WIN 2 536 19.7 22.2 28.3 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 758 27.8 31.4 59.7 TOSSUP 4 577 21.2 23.9 83.6 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 208 7.6 8.6 92.2 PROBABLY LOSE 6 124 4.6 5.1 97.3 CERTAIN LOSE 7 64 2.3 2.7 100.0 . 236 8.7 Missing NOT SURE 8 76 2.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2413 Missing cases 312 NOMPD8A Q23, chance of nom, DuPont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 9 .3 .4 .4 PROBABLY WIN 2 8 .3 .4 .8 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 73 2.7 3.4 4.2 TOSSUP 4 205 7.5 9.5 13.7 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 401 14.7 18.7 32.4 PROBABLY LOSE 6 506 18.6 23.5 55.9 CERTAIN LOSE 7 947 34.8 44.1 100.0 . 291 10.7 Missing NOT SURE 8 285 10.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2149 Missing cases 576 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOMAH8A Q23, chance of nom, Haig Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 6 .2 .3 .3 PROBABLY WIN 2 11 .4 .5 .7 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 41 1.5 1.8 2.5 TOSSUP 4 117 4.3 5.1 7.7 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 265 9.7 11.6 19.3 PROBABLY LOSE 6 458 16.8 20.1 39.4 CERTAIN LOSE 7 1384 50.8 60.6 100.0 . 266 9.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 177 6.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2282 Missing cases 443 NOMJK8A Q23, chance of nom, Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 15 .6 .7 .7 PROBABLY WIN 2 62 2.3 2.7 3.4 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 166 6.1 7.4 10.8 TOSSUP 4 369 13.5 16.4 27.1 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 439 16.1 19.5 46.6 PROBABLY LOSE 6 585 21.5 25.9 72.5 CERTAIN LOSE 7 619 22.7 27.5 100.0 . 269 9.9 Missing NOT SURE 8 201 7.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2255 Missing cases 470 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOMPR8A Q23, chance of nom, Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 16 .6 .7 .7 PROBABLY WIN 2 30 1.1 1.3 2.0 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 84 3.1 3.6 5.5 TOSSUP 4 235 8.6 10.0 15.6 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 390 14.3 16.6 32.2 PROBABLY LOSE 6 549 20.1 23.4 55.6 CERTAIN LOSE 7 1042 38.2 44.4 100.0 . 241 8.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 138 5.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2346 Missing cases 379 NOVBB8A Q23, chance to win ge, Babbitt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 34 1.2 1.5 1.5 PROBABLY WIN 2 80 2.9 3.4 4.9 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 147 5.4 6.3 11.2 TOSSUP 4 377 13.8 16.2 27.4 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 461 16.9 19.8 47.2 PROBABLY LOSE 6 595 21.8 25.6 72.8 CERTAIN LOSE 7 633 23.2 27.2 100.0 . 398 14.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2327 Missing cases 398 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOVMD8A Q23, chance to win ge, Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 158 5.8 6.6 6.6 PROBABLY WIN 2 371 13.6 15.4 22.0 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 458 16.8 19.0 41.0 TOSSUP 4 612 22.5 25.4 66.3 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 394 14.5 16.3 82.7 PROBABLY LOSE 6 269 9.9 11.2 93.9 CERTAIN LOSE 7 148 5.4 6.1 100.0 . 315 11.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2410 Missing cases 315 NOVRG8A Q23, chance to win ge, Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 115 4.2 4.8 4.8 PROBABLY WIN 2 263 9.7 11.1 15.9 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 363 13.3 15.3 31.2 TOSSUP 4 606 22.2 25.5 56.8 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 493 18.1 20.8 77.5 PROBABLY LOSE 6 321 11.8 13.5 91.1 CERTAIN LOSE 7 212 7.8 8.9 100.0 . 352 12.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2373 Missing cases 352 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOVAG8A Q23, chance to win ge, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 34 1.2 1.4 1.4 PROBABLY WIN 2 101 3.7 4.3 5.8 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 218 8.0 9.3 15.0 TOSSUP 4 520 19.1 22.2 37.2 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 568 20.8 24.2 61.4 PROBABLY LOSE 6 506 18.6 21.6 83.0 CERTAIN LOSE 7 399 14.6 17.0 100.0 . 379 13.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2346 Missing cases 379 NOVGH8A Q23, chance to win ge, Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 36 1.3 1.5 1.5 PROBABLY WIN 2 56 2.1 2.3 3.8 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 90 3.3 3.8 7.6 TOSSUP 4 161 5.9 6.7 14.3 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 327 12.0 13.6 27.9 PROBABLY LOSE 6 568 20.8 23.7 51.6 CERTAIN LOSE 7 1161 42.6 48.4 100.0 . 326 12.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2399 Missing cases 326 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOVJJ8A Q23, chance to win ge, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 46 1.7 1.9 1.9 PROBABLY WIN 2 70 2.6 2.9 4.8 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 130 4.8 5.4 10.3 TOSSUP 4 296 10.9 12.3 22.6 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 497 18.2 20.7 43.3 PROBABLY LOSE 6 549 20.1 22.9 66.2 CERTAIN LOSE 7 809 29.7 33.8 100.0 . 328 12.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2397 Missing cases 328 NOVPS8A Q23, chance to win ge, Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 70 2.6 3.0 3.0 PROBABLY WIN 2 194 7.1 8.3 11.3 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 278 10.2 11.9 23.1 TOSSUP 4 556 20.4 23.7 46.9 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 489 17.9 20.9 67.8 PROBABLY LOSE 6 394 14.5 16.8 84.6 CERTAIN LOSE 7 361 13.2 15.4 100.0 . 383 14.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2342 Missing cases 383 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOVGB8A Q23, chance to win ge, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 379 13.9 15.6 15.6 PROBABLY WIN 2 690 25.3 28.5 44.1 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 437 16.0 18.0 62.1 TOSSUP 4 456 16.7 18.8 80.9 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 245 9.0 10.1 91.0 PROBABLY LOSE 6 109 4.0 4.5 95.5 CERTAIN LOSE 7 109 4.0 4.5 100.0 . 300 11.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2425 Missing cases 300 NOVRD8A Q23, chance to win ge, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 227 8.3 9.4 9.4 PROBABLY WIN 2 718 26.3 29.8 39.2 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 653 24.0 27.1 66.3 TOSSUP 4 516 18.9 21.4 87.7 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 143 5.2 5.9 93.7 PROBABLY LOSE 6 81 3.0 3.4 97.0 CERTAIN LOSE 7 72 2.6 3.0 100.0 . 315 11.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2410 Missing cases 315 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOVPD8A Q23, chance to win ge, DuPont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 19 .7 .8 .8 PROBABLY WIN 2 67 2.5 2.9 3.7 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 175 6.4 7.5 11.2 TOSSUP 4 356 13.1 15.3 26.5 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 482 17.7 20.7 47.1 PROBABLY LOSE 6 575 21.1 24.7 71.8 CERTAIN LOSE 7 658 24.1 28.2 100.0 . 393 14.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2332 Missing cases 393 NOVAH8A Q23, chance to win ge, Haig Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 12 .4 .5 .5 PROBABLY WIN 2 38 1.4 1.6 2.1 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 88 3.2 3.7 5.8 TOSSUP 4 202 7.4 8.5 14.4 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 419 15.4 17.7 32.0 PROBABLY LOSE 6 679 24.9 28.7 60.7 CERTAIN LOSE 7 931 34.2 39.3 100.0 . 356 13.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2369 Missing cases 356 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOVJK8A Q23, chance to win ge, Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 59 2.2 2.5 2.5 PROBABLY WIN 2 173 6.3 7.3 9.8 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 251 9.2 10.6 20.5 TOSSUP 4 471 17.3 20.0 40.5 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 427 15.7 18.1 58.6 PROBABLY LOSE 6 521 19.1 22.1 80.7 CERTAIN LOSE 7 455 16.7 19.3 100.0 . 368 13.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2357 Missing cases 368 NOVPR8A Q23, chance to win ge, Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 33 1.2 1.4 1.4 PROBABLY WIN 2 72 2.6 3.0 4.4 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 114 4.2 4.8 9.1 TOSSUP 4 302 11.1 12.6 21.7 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 399 14.6 16.7 38.4 PROBABLY LOSE 6 622 22.8 26.0 64.4 CERTAIN LOSE 7 854 31.3 35.6 100.0 . 329 12.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2396 Missing cases 329 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TEACH8A Q24, group member, Teachers Org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NEVER MEMBER 1 2057 75.5 80.7 80.7 MEMB ONLY 2 308 11.3 12.1 92.7 ACTIVE MEMB 3 185 6.8 7.3 100.0 . 175 6.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2550 Missing cases 175 BUSORG8A Q24, group member, Bus Org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NEVER MEMBER 1 1854 68.0 72.7 72.7 MEMB ONLY 2 486 17.8 19.1 91.8 ACTIVE MEMB 3 210 7.7 8.2 100.0 . 175 6.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2550 Missing cases 175 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WOMEN8A Q24, group member, Women's Rights Grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NEVER MEMBER 1 2270 83.3 89.0 89.0 MEMB ONLY 2 191 7.0 7.5 96.5 ACTIVE MEMB 3 89 3.3 3.5 100.0 . 175 6.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2550 Missing cases 175 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CIVILR8A Q24, group member, Civil Rights Grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NEVER MEMBER 1 2245 82.4 88.0 88.0 MEMB ONLY 2 237 8.7 9.3 97.3 ACTIVE MEMB 3 68 2.5 2.7 100.0 . 175 6.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2550 Missing cases 175 ENVIR8A Q24, group member, Environ Group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NEVER MEMBER 1 2072 76.0 81.3 81.3 MEMB ONLY 2 395 14.5 15.5 96.7 ACTIVE MEMB 3 83 3.0 3.3 100.0 . 175 6.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2550 Missing cases 175 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NONPRT8A Q24, group member, Interest Grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NEVER MEMBER 1 1990 73.0 78.0 78.0 MEMB ONLY 2 409 15.0 16.0 94.1 ACTIVE MEMB 3 151 5.5 5.9 100.0 . 175 6.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2550 Missing cases 175 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LABOR8A Q24, group member, Labor Union Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NEVER MEMBER 1 1945 71.4 76.3 76.3 MEMB ONLY 2 412 15.1 16.2 92.4 ACTIVE MEMB 3 193 7.1 7.6 100.0 . 175 6.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2550 Missing cases 175 FARM8A Q24, group member, Farm Org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NEVER MEMBER 1 2089 76.7 81.9 81.9 MEMB ONLY 2 337 12.4 13.2 95.1 ACTIVE MEMB 3 124 4.6 4.9 100.0 . 175 6.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2550 Missing cases 175 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVANG8A Q24, group member, Pol Evang Grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NEVER MEMBER 1 2421 88.8 94.9 94.9 MEMB ONLY 2 85 3.1 3.3 98.3 ACTIVE MEMB 3 44 1.6 1.7 100.0 . 175 6.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2550 Missing cases 175 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ANTIAB8A Q24, group member, Anti-Abortion Grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NEVER MEMBER 1 2305 84.6 90.4 90.4 MEMB ONLY 2 171 6.3 6.7 97.1 ACTIVE MEMB 3 74 2.7 2.9 100.0 . 175 6.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2550 Missing cases 175 LIBID8A Q24, group member, Liberal Phil Grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NEVER MEMBER 1 2290 84.0 89.8 89.8 MEMB ONLY 2 192 7.0 7.5 97.3 ACTIVE MEMB 3 68 2.5 2.7 100.0 . 175 6.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2550 Missing cases 175 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONID8A Q24, group member, Conserv Phil Grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NEVER MEMBER 1 2264 83.1 88.8 88.8 MEMB ONLY 2 197 7.2 7.7 96.5 ACTIVE MEMB 3 89 3.3 3.5 100.0 . 175 6.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2550 Missing cases 175 IMPTGR8A Q25, grp most impt politically Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent TEACH 1 208 7.6 10.9 10.9 BUS ORG 2 290 10.6 15.2 26.2 WOMENS GR 3 73 2.7 3.8 30.0 CIVIL RTS 4 109 4.0 5.7 35.7 ENVIRON 5 129 4.7 6.8 42.5 INT GRP 6 200 7.3 10.5 53.0 UNION 7 277 10.2 14.5 67.5 FARM ORG 8 231 8.5 12.1 79.7 EVANG GRP 9 48 1.8 2.5 82.2 ANTI ABORT 10 96 3.5 5.0 87.2 LIBERAL GR 11 93 3.4 4.9 92.1 CONSERV GR 12 150 5.5 7.9 100.0 . 821 30.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1904 Missing cases 821 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PTYSP8A Q26, party and activity of spouse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACTIVE DEM 1 559 20.5 26.8 26.8 INACT DEM 2 439 16.1 21.1 47.9 ACTIVE REP 3 533 19.6 25.6 73.4 INCAT REP 4 315 11.6 15.1 88.5 ACTIVE INDEP 5 79 2.9 3.8 92.3 INACT INDEP 6 160 5.9 7.7 100.0 . 600 22.0 Missing NOT SURE 7 40 1.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2085 Missing cases 640 PTYM8A Q26, party and activity of Mother Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACTIVE DEM 1 333 12.2 15.8 15.8 INACT DEM 2 677 24.8 32.1 47.9 ACTIVE REP 3 242 8.9 11.5 59.4 INCAT REP 4 593 21.8 28.1 87.6 ACTIVE INDEP 5 67 2.5 3.2 90.7 INACT INDEP 6 195 7.2 9.3 100.0 . 440 16.1 Missing NOT SURE 7 178 6.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2107 Missing cases 618 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PTYF8A Q26, party and activity of Father Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACTIVE DEM 1 391 14.3 18.7 18.7 INACT DEM 2 622 22.8 29.8 48.5 ACTIVE REP 3 314 11.5 15.0 63.5 INCAT REP 4 551 20.2 26.4 89.9 ACTIVE INDEP 5 66 2.4 3.2 93.1 INACT INDEP 6 145 5.3 6.9 100.0 . 482 17.7 Missing NOT SURE 7 154 5.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2089 Missing cases 636 CANSUP8A Q27, initially supported Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BABBITT 1 93 3.4 3.8 3.8 BUSH 2 482 17.7 19.8 23.6 DOLE 3 265 9.7 10.9 34.5 DUKAKIS 4 282 10.3 11.6 46.1 DUPONT 5 39 1.4 1.6 47.7 GEPHART 6 209 7.7 8.6 56.3 GORE 7 138 5.1 5.7 62.0 HAIG 8 7 .3 .3 62.2 HART 9 68 2.5 2.8 65.0 JACKSON 10 199 7.3 8.2 73.2 KEMP 11 150 5.5 6.2 79.4 ROBERTSON 12 42 1.5 1.7 81.1 SIMON 13 223 8.2 9.2 90.3 NONE 14 237 8.7 9.7 100.0 . 291 10.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2434 Missing cases 291 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTBB8A Q28, attended rally, Babbitt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2608 95.7 95.7 95.7 CHECKED 1 117 4.3 4.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 FUNDBB8A Q28, fundraising, Babbitt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2710 99.4 99.4 99.4 CHECKED 1 15 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVBB8A Q28, convince friends, Babbitt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2648 97.2 97.2 97.2 CHECKED 1 77 2.8 2.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVBB8A Q28, canvass, Babbitt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2706 99.3 99.3 99.3 CHECKED 1 19 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 MONBB8A Q28, contribute, Babbitt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2696 98.9 98.9 98.9 CHECKED 1 29 1.1 1.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTMD8A Q28, attended rally, Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2545 93.4 93.4 93.4 CHECKED 1 180 6.6 6.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDMD8A Q28, fundraising, Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2693 98.8 98.8 98.8 CHECKED 1 32 1.2 1.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 CONVMD8A Q28, convince friends, Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2557 93.8 93.8 93.8 CHECKED 1 168 6.2 6.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVMD8A Q28, canvass, Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2695 98.9 98.9 98.9 CHECKED 1 30 1.1 1.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONMD8A Q28, contribute, Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2675 98.2 98.2 98.2 CHECKED 1 50 1.8 1.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 ATTRG8A Q28, attended rally, Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2570 94.3 94.3 94.3 CHECKED 1 155 5.7 5.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDRG8A Q28, fundraising, Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2696 98.9 98.9 98.9 CHECKED 1 29 1.1 1.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVRG8A Q28, convince friends, Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2582 94.8 94.8 94.8 CHECKED 1 143 5.2 5.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 CANVRG8A Q28, canvass, Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2697 99.0 99.0 99.0 CHECKED 1 28 1.0 1.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONRG8A Q28, contribute, Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2676 98.2 98.2 98.2 CHECKED 1 49 1.8 1.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTAG8A Q28, attended rally, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2632 96.6 96.6 96.6 CHECKED 1 93 3.4 3.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 FUNDAG8A Q28, fundraising, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2712 99.5 99.5 99.5 CHECKED 1 13 .5 .5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVAG8A Q28, convince friends, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2652 97.3 97.3 97.3 CHECKED 1 73 2.7 2.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVAG8A Q28, canvass, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2719 99.8 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 6 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 MONAG8A Q28, contribute, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2706 99.3 99.3 99.3 CHECKED 1 19 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTGH8A Q28, attended rally, Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2641 96.9 96.9 96.9 CHECKED 1 84 3.1 3.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDGH8A Q28, fundraising, Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2715 99.6 99.6 99.6 CHECKED 1 10 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 CONVGH8A Q28, convince friends, Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2654 97.4 97.4 97.4 CHECKED 1 71 2.6 2.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVGH8A Q28, canvass, Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2714 99.6 99.6 99.6 CHECKED 1 11 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONGH8A Q28, contribute, Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2694 98.9 98.9 98.9 CHECKED 1 31 1.1 1.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 ATTJJ8A Q28, attended rally, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2530 92.8 92.8 92.8 CHECKED 1 195 7.2 7.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDJJ8A Q28, fundraising, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2686 98.6 98.6 98.6 CHECKED 1 39 1.4 1.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVJJ8A Q28, convince friends, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2587 94.9 94.9 94.9 CHECKED 1 138 5.1 5.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 CANVJJ8A Q28, canvass, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2699 99.0 99.0 99.0 CHECKED 1 26 1.0 1.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONJJ8A Q28, contribute, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2637 96.8 96.8 96.8 CHECKED 1 88 3.2 3.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTPS8A Q28, attended rally, Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2561 94.0 94.0 94.0 CHECKED 1 164 6.0 6.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 FUNDPS8A Q28, fundraising, Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2707 99.3 99.3 99.3 CHECKED 1 18 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVPS8A Q28, convince friends, Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2585 94.9 94.9 94.9 CHECKED 1 140 5.1 5.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVPS8A Q28, canvass, Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2693 98.8 98.8 98.8 CHECKED 1 32 1.2 1.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 MONPS8A Q28, contribute, Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2667 97.9 97.9 97.9 CHECKED 1 58 2.1 2.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTGB8A Q28, attended rally, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2321 85.2 85.2 85.2 CHECKED 1 404 14.8 14.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDGB8A Q28, fundraising, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2618 96.1 96.1 96.1 CHECKED 1 107 3.9 3.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 CONVGB8A Q28, convince friends, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2431 89.2 89.2 89.2 CHECKED 1 294 10.8 10.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVGB8A Q28, canvass, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2604 95.6 95.6 95.6 CHECKED 1 121 4.4 4.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONGB8A Q28, contribute, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2499 91.7 91.7 91.7 CHECKED 1 226 8.3 8.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 ATTRD8A Q28, attended rally, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2494 91.5 91.5 91.5 CHECKED 1 231 8.5 8.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDRD8A Q28, fundraising, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2681 98.4 98.4 98.4 CHECKED 1 44 1.6 1.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVRD8A Q28, convince friends, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2559 93.9 93.9 93.9 CHECKED 1 166 6.1 6.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 CANVRD8A Q28, canvass, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2681 98.4 98.4 98.4 CHECKED 1 44 1.6 1.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONRD8A Q28, contribute, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2619 96.1 96.1 96.1 CHECKED 1 106 3.9 3.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTPD8A Q28, attended rally, DuPont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2661 97.7 97.7 97.7 CHECKED 1 64 2.3 2.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 FUNDPD8A Q28, fundraising, DuPont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2718 99.7 99.7 99.7 CHECKED 1 7 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVPD8A Q28, convince friends, DuPont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2687 98.6 98.6 98.6 CHECKED 1 38 1.4 1.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVPD8A Q28, canvass, DuPont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2718 99.7 99.7 99.7 CHECKED 1 7 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 MONPD8A Q28, contribute, DuPont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2709 99.4 99.4 99.4 CHECKED 1 16 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTAH8A Q28, attended rally, Haig Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2686 98.6 98.6 98.6 CHECKED 1 39 1.4 1.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDAH8A Q28, fundraising, Haig Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2722 99.9 99.9 99.9 CHECKED 1 3 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 CONVAH8A Q28, convince friends, Haig Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2709 99.4 99.4 99.4 CHECKED 1 16 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVAH8A Q28, canvass, Haig Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2722 99.9 99.9 99.9 CHECKED 1 3 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONAH8A Q28, contribute, Haig Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2721 99.9 99.9 99.9 CHECKED 1 4 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 ATTJK8A Q28, attended rally, Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2540 93.2 93.2 93.2 CHECKED 1 185 6.8 6.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDJK8A Q28, fundraising, Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2690 98.7 98.7 98.7 CHECKED 1 35 1.3 1.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVJK8A Q28, convince friends, Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2605 95.6 95.6 95.6 CHECKED 1 120 4.4 4.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 CANVJK8A Q28, canvass, Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2689 98.7 98.7 98.7 CHECKED 1 36 1.3 1.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONJK8A Q28, contribute, Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2635 96.7 96.7 96.7 CHECKED 1 90 3.3 3.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTPR8A Q28, attended rally, Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2637 96.8 96.8 96.8 CHECKED 1 88 3.2 3.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 FUNDPR8A Q28, fundraising, Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2716 99.7 99.7 99.7 CHECKED 1 9 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVPR8A Q28, convince friends, Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2678 98.3 98.3 98.3 CHECKED 1 47 1.7 1.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVPR8A Q28, canvass, Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2718 99.7 99.7 99.7 CHECKED 1 7 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 MONPR8A Q28, contribute, Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2700 99.1 99.1 99.1 CHECKED 1 25 .9 .9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AGE8A Q29, Age Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 17-24 1 45 1.7 1.7 1.7 25-29 2 91 3.3 3.5 5.2 30-39 3 348 12.8 13.2 18.4 40-49 4 464 17.0 17.6 36.0 50-59 5 611 22.4 23.2 59.2 60-64 6 352 12.9 13.4 72.6 65+ 7 722 26.5 27.4 100.0 . 92 3.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2633 Missing cases 92 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SEX8A Q30, Gender Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MALE 1 1434 52.6 53.0 53.0 FEMALE 2 1270 46.6 47.0 100.0 . 21 .8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2704 Missing cases 21 MARR8A Q31, Married Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 2069 75.9 79.3 79.3 NO 2 539 19.8 20.7 100.0 . 117 4.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2608 Missing cases 117 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - REL8A Q32, Religion Pref Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CATHOLIC 1 545 20.0 21.7 21.7 JEWISH 2 39 1.4 1.6 23.3 PROTESTANT 3 1663 61.0 66.3 89.6 OTHER 4 56 2.1 2.2 91.8 NO RELIG 5 206 7.6 8.2 100.0 . 216 7.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2509 Missing cases 216 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BNAG8A Q23, born-again Christian Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO .00 1857 68.1 72.5 72.5 YES 1.00 706 25.9 27.5 100.0 . 162 5.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2563 Missing cases 162 FUNDAM8A Q34, Fundamentalist Christian Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 446 16.4 17.8 17.8 NO 2 2057 75.5 82.2 100.0 . 222 8.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2503 Missing cases 222 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HOWREL8A Q35, How Religious Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY 1 578 21.2 22.3 22.3 FAIRLY 2 1443 53.0 55.7 78.0 NOT VERY 3 397 14.6 15.3 93.3 NOT REL 4 174 6.4 6.7 100.0 . 105 3.9 Missing NOT SURE 5 28 1.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2592 Missing cases 133 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RACE8A Q36, race Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent WHITE 1 2402 88.1 92.3 92.3 BLACK 2 166 6.1 6.4 98.7 OTHER 3 34 1.2 1.3 100.0 . 123 4.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2602 Missing cases 123 SCHOOL8A Q37, Schooling Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0-8 1 67 2.5 2.6 2.6 9-11 2 114 4.2 4.5 7.1 12 3 559 20.5 22.1 29.2 13-15 4 560 20.6 22.1 51.3 COLL GRAD 5 579 21.2 22.9 74.2 GRAD SCH 6 653 24.0 25.8 100.0 . 193 7.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2532 Missing cases 193 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - JOBYOU8A Q38, employment you Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SM BUS 1 260 9.5 11.0 11.0 LG BUS 2 519 19.0 22.0 33.0 EDUCATION 3 429 15.7 18.2 51.2 GOVT 4 372 13.7 15.8 66.9 SELFEMP-BUS 5 189 6.9 8.0 75.0 SELFEMP-FARM 6 134 4.9 5.7 80.6 SELFEMP-PROF 7 158 5.8 6.7 87.3 HOUSEWIFE 8 259 9.5 11.0 98.3 STUDENT 9 40 1.5 1.7 100.0 . 365 13.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2360 Missing cases 365 JOBSP8A Q38, employment spouse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent SM BUS 1 226 8.3 11.9 11.9 LG BUS 2 397 14.6 20.9 32.9 EDUCATION 3 302 11.1 15.9 48.8 GOVT 4 238 8.7 12.6 61.4 SELFEMP-BUS 5 145 5.3 7.7 69.0 SELFEMP-FARM 6 134 4.9 7.1 76.1 SELFEMP-PROF 7 99 3.6 5.2 81.3 HOUSEWIFE 8 347 12.7 18.3 99.6 STUDENT 9 7 .3 .4 100.0 . 830 30.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1895 Missing cases 830 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INCOME8A Q39, Income Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent under $9,999 1 150 5.5 5.9 5.9 $10,000-19,999 2 362 13.3 14.3 20.3 $20,000-29,999 3 438 16.1 17.3 37.6 $30,000-39,999 4 447 16.4 17.7 55.3 $40,000-49,999 5 371 13.6 14.7 69.9 $50,000-59,999 6 262 9.6 10.4 80.3 $60,000-69,999 7 148 5.4 5.9 86.2 $70,000-79,999 8 101 3.7 4.0 90.2 $80,000+ 9 249 9.1 9.8 100.0 . 197 7.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2528 Missing cases 197 CLASS8A Q40, social class Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UPPER 1 40 1.5 1.7 1.7 UPPER MIDDLE 2 646 23.7 27.2 28.8 MIDDLE 3 1294 47.5 54.4 83.2 LOWER MIDDLE 4 207 7.6 8.7 91.9 WORKING 5 192 7.0 8.1 100.0 . 112 4.1 Missing OTHER 6 234 8.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2379 Missing cases 346 DATE8A Q41, Date Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 2 4 .1 .2 .2 3 1 .0 .0 .2 6 1 .0 .0 .2 20 1 .0 .0 .3 21 1 .0 .0 .3 22 1 .0 .0 .4 29 1 .0 .0 .4 31 2 .1 .1 .5 102 3 .1 .1 .6 103 1 .0 .0 .6 105 2 .1 .1 .7 108 1 .0 .0 .7 109 1 .0 .0 .8 112 1 .0 .0 .8 119 1 .0 .0 .9 124 1 .0 .0 .9 125 1 .0 .0 .9 128 12 .4 .5 1.4 129 161 5.9 6.3 7.7 130 165 6.1 6.5 14.2 131 84 3.1 3.3 17.4 201 275 10.1 10.8 28.2 202 236 8.7 9.2 37.4 203 132 4.8 5.2 42.6 204 135 5.0 5.3 47.9 205 153 5.6 6.0 53.9 206 144 5.3 5.6 59.5 207 100 3.7 3.9 63.4 208 143 5.2 5.6 69.0 209 67 2.5 2.6 71.6 210 45 1.7 1.8 73.4 211 32 1.2 1.3 74.6 212 22 .8 .9 75.5 213 28 1.0 1.1 76.6 214 13 .5 .5 77.1 215 27 1.0 1.1 78.1 216 18 .7 .7 78.8 217 14 .5 .5 79.4 218 7 .3 .3 79.7 219 8 .3 .3 80.0 220 7 .3 .3 80.3 221 8 .3 .3 80.6 222 10 .4 .4 81.0 223 8 .3 .3 81.3 224 1 .0 .0 81.3 225 4 .1 .2 81.5 DATE8A Q41, Date 226 3 .1 .1 81.6 227 7 .3 .3 81.9 228 4 .1 .2 82.0 229 8 .3 .3 82.3 301 8 .3 .3 82.6 302 2 .1 .1 82.7 303 2 .1 .1 82.8 304 4 .1 .2 82.9 305 2 .1 .1 83.0 306 2 .1 .1 83.1 307 8 .3 .3 83.4 308 2 .1 .1 83.5 309 9 .3 .4 83.8 310 19 .7 .7 84.6 311 32 1.2 1.3 85.8 312 34 1.2 1.3 87.2 313 23 .8 .9 88.1 314 48 1.8 1.9 89.9 315 58 2.1 2.3 92.2 316 42 1.5 1.6 93.9 317 24 .9 .9 94.8 318 18 .7 .7 95.5 319 13 .5 .5 96.0 320 18 .7 .7 96.7 321 16 .6 .6 97.3 322 12 .4 .5 97.8 323 8 .3 .3 98.1 324 5 .2 .2 98.3 325 7 .3 .3 98.6 326 4 .1 .2 98.7 327 4 .1 .2 98.9 328 7 .3 .3 99.2 329 3 .1 .1 99.3 330 3 .1 .1 99.4 331 2 .1 .1 99.5 401 1 .0 .0 99.5 404 2 .1 .1 99.6 405 2 .1 .1 99.7 407 1 .0 .0 99.7 409 1 .0 .0 99.8 411 1 .0 .0 99.8 413 1 .0 .0 99.8 414 1 .0 .0 99.9 415 1 .0 .0 99.9 416 1 .0 .0 100.0 1315 1 .0 .0 100.0 . 168 6.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2557 Missing cases 168 RSPN88A 1988 A wave response Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1.00 2725 100.0 100.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 *1988B* PARTIC8B Q1, participate in nomination process? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 1389 51.0 78.4 78.4 NO 2 382 14.0 21.6 100.0 . 954 35.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1771 Missing cases 954 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PARTY8B Q1, for which party? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent DEMOCRAT 1 796 29.2 58.7 58.7 REPUBLICAN 2 559 20.5 41.3 100.0 . 1370 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1355 Missing cases 1370 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PTYID8B Q2, party affiliation Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONG DEMOCRAT 1 644 23.6 36.2 36.2 WEAK DEMOCRAT 2 206 7.6 11.6 47.8 INDEPENDENT DEM 3 166 6.1 9.3 57.1 INDEPENDENT 4 30 1.1 1.7 58.8 INDEPENDENT REP 5 76 2.8 4.3 63.1 WEAK REPUBLICAN 6 132 4.8 7.4 70.5 STRONG REPUBLICAN 7 525 19.3 29.5 100.0 . 945 34.7 Missing OTHER 8 1 .0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1779 Missing cases 946 LIBCON8B Q3, political philosophy Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 48 1.8 2.7 2.7 LIBERAL 2 393 14.4 22.4 25.2 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 259 9.5 14.8 40.0 M-O-R 4 273 10.0 15.6 55.6 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 275 10.1 15.7 71.3 CONSERVATIVE 6 446 16.4 25.5 96.7 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 57 2.1 3.3 100.0 . 944 34.6 Missing NOT SURE 8 30 1.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1751 Missing cases 974 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATNEWS8B Q4, how much attention to newspapers in Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent A GREAT DEAL 1 535 19.6 30.0 30.0 QUITE A BIT 2 654 24.0 36.7 66.7 SOME 3 440 16.1 24.7 91.4 VERY LITTLE 4 138 5.1 7.7 99.1 NONE 5 16 .6 .9 100.0 . 942 34.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1783 Missing cases 942 HELPPP8B Q5a, reason for participating, help part Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY 1 714 26.2 46.3 46.3 SOMEWHAT 2 561 20.6 36.4 82.7 NOT VERY 3 173 6.3 11.2 94.0 NOT AT ALL 4 93 3.4 6.0 100.0 . 1184 43.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1541 Missing cases 1184 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GROUP8B Q5b, reason for participating, group mem Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY 1 183 6.7 12.8 12.8 SOMEWHAT 2 319 11.7 22.3 35.1 NOT VERY 3 308 11.3 21.5 56.6 NOT AT ALL 4 622 22.8 43.4 100.0 . 1293 47.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1432 Missing cases 1293 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CAND8B Q5c, reason for participating, candidate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY 1 842 30.9 55.3 55.3 SOMEWHAT 2 523 19.2 34.4 89.7 NOT VERY 3 109 4.0 7.2 96.8 NOT AT ALL 4 48 1.8 3.2 100.0 . 1203 44.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1522 Missing cases 1203 ISS8B Q5d, reason for participating, issue pos Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY 1 964 35.4 62.2 62.2 SOMEWHAT 2 472 17.3 30.5 92.7 NOT VERY 3 79 2.9 5.1 97.8 NOT AT ALL 4 34 1.2 2.2 100.0 . 1176 43.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1549 Missing cases 1176 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MIREAS8B Q6, most important reason for participat Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent POL PARTY 1 425 15.6 26.0 26.0 GROUP 2 52 1.9 3.2 29.2 CANDIDATE 3 481 17.7 29.4 58.6 ISSUES 4 677 24.8 41.4 100.0 . 1090 40.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1635 Missing cases 1090 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WINNOV8B Q7a, support candidate chance of winning Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY 1 642 23.6 40.7 40.7 SOMEWHAT 2 579 21.2 36.7 77.3 NOT VERY 3 201 7.4 12.7 90.1 NOT AT ALL 4 157 5.8 9.9 100.0 . 1146 42.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1579 Missing cases 1146 PHIL8B Q7b, support most prox candidate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY 1 1177 43.2 70.0 70.0 SOMEWHAT 2 469 17.2 27.9 97.9 NOT VERY 3 22 .8 1.3 99.2 NOT AT ALL 4 14 .5 .8 100.0 . 1043 38.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1682 Missing cases 1043 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ISTOME8B Q7c, support candidate issues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY 1 782 28.7 48.7 48.7 SOMEWHAT 2 672 24.7 41.8 90.5 NOT VERY 3 129 4.7 8.0 98.6 NOT AT ALL 4 23 .8 1.4 100.0 . 1119 41.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1606 Missing cases 1119 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WINNOM8B Q7d, support candidate chance of winning Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY 1 584 21.4 37.3 37.3 SOMEWHAT 2 616 22.6 39.3 76.6 NOT VERY 3 255 9.4 16.3 92.9 NOT AT ALL 4 112 4.1 7.1 100.0 . 1158 42.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1567 Missing cases 1158 MISUP8B Q8, most important reason for supporting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent WIN GE 1 429 15.7 25.1 25.1 MOST PROX 2 706 25.9 41.4 66.5 ISSUE 3 424 15.6 24.9 91.4 WIN NOM 4 147 5.4 8.6 100.0 . 1019 37.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1706 Missing cases 1019 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABORT8B Q9a, amendment to prohibit abortions Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 334 12.3 20.4 20.4 FAVOR 2 217 8.0 13.2 33.6 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 96 3.5 5.9 39.5 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 89 3.3 5.4 44.9 OPPOSE 6 306 11.2 18.7 63.6 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 596 21.9 36.4 100.0 . 963 35.3 Missing NOT SURE 4 124 4.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1638 Missing cases 1087 DEFSP8B Q9b, keep defense spending at levels now Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 202 7.4 12.5 12.5 FAVOR 2 287 10.5 17.7 30.2 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 171 6.3 10.6 40.8 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 188 6.9 11.6 52.4 OPPOSE 6 351 12.9 21.7 74.1 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 420 15.4 25.9 100.0 . 964 35.4 Missing NOT SURE 4 142 5.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1619 Missing cases 1106 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AFFACT8B Q9c, affirmative action programs Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 164 6.0 10.8 10.8 FAVOR 2 314 11.5 20.6 31.4 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 382 14.0 25.1 56.5 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 242 8.9 15.9 72.5 OPPOSE 6 264 9.7 17.4 89.8 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 155 5.7 10.2 100.0 . 977 35.9 Missing NOT SURE 4 227 8.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1521 Missing cases 1204 BALBUD8B Q9d, amendment to balance budget Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 475 17.4 30.8 30.8 FAVOR 2 383 14.1 24.9 55.7 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 211 7.7 13.7 69.4 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 106 3.9 6.9 76.2 OPPOSE 6 179 6.6 11.6 87.9 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 187 6.9 12.1 100.0 . 988 36.3 Missing NOT SURE 4 196 7.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1541 Missing cases 1184 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - POLLUT8B Q9e, increased environ regulation Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 512 18.8 31.3 31.3 FAVOR 2 557 20.4 34.1 65.4 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 337 12.4 20.6 86.0 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 103 3.8 6.3 92.4 OPPOSE 6 86 3.2 5.3 97.6 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 39 1.4 2.4 100.0 . 975 35.8 Missing NOT SURE 4 116 4.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1634 Missing cases 1091 CONTRA8B Q9f, support Contras in Central America Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 199 7.3 13.8 13.8 FAVOR 2 210 7.7 14.5 28.3 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 177 6.5 12.2 40.5 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 96 3.5 6.6 47.2 OPPOSE 6 252 9.2 17.4 64.6 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 512 18.8 35.4 100.0 . 988 36.3 Missing NOT SURE 4 291 10.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1446 Missing cases 1279 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FARM8B Q9g, increased aid to farmers Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 179 6.6 12.5 12.5 FAVOR 2 331 12.1 23.1 35.5 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 352 12.9 24.5 60.1 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 264 9.7 18.4 78.5 OPPOSE 6 222 8.1 15.5 93.9 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 87 3.2 6.1 100.0 . 994 36.5 Missing NOT SURE 4 296 10.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1435 Missing cases 1290 TARIFF8B Q9h, increased tariffs Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 256 9.4 17.1 17.1 FAVOR 2 312 11.4 20.8 37.8 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 269 9.9 17.9 55.8 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 199 7.3 13.3 69.0 OPPOSE 6 295 10.8 19.7 88.7 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 170 6.2 11.3 100.0 . 986 36.2 Missing NOT SURE 4 238 8.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1501 Missing cases 1224 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SDI8B Q9i, increased commitment to SDI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 149 5.5 10.0 10.0 FAVOR 2 210 7.7 14.0 24.0 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 204 7.5 13.6 37.7 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 114 4.2 7.6 45.3 OPPOSE 6 287 10.5 19.2 64.5 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 531 19.5 35.5 100.0 . 986 36.2 Missing NOT SURE 4 244 9.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1495 Missing cases 1230 PRAYER8B Q9j, amendment to permit school prayer Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 315 11.6 19.7 19.7 FAVOR 2 290 10.6 18.2 37.9 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 193 7.1 12.1 50.0 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 104 3.8 6.5 56.5 OPPOSE 6 226 8.3 14.2 70.7 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 468 17.2 29.3 100.0 . 969 35.6 Missing NOT SURE 4 160 5.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1596 Missing cases 1129 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MIISS8B Q10, most important issue Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ABORTION 1 207 7.6 12.6 12.6 DEF. SPENDING 2 250 9.2 15.3 27.9 AFF. ACTION 3 76 2.8 4.6 32.5 BAL. BUDGET 4 422 15.5 25.8 58.3 POLLUTION 5 188 6.9 11.5 69.8 CONTRAS 6 104 3.8 6.3 76.1 FARM AID 7 65 2.4 4.0 80.1 TARIFFS 8 158 5.8 9.6 89.7 SDI 9 99 3.6 6.0 95.8 SCHOOL PRAYER 10 69 2.5 4.2 100.0 . 1087 39.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1638 Missing cases 1087 LCGB8B Q11, political philosophy, George Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 16 .6 1.0 1.0 LIBERAL 2 31 1.1 1.9 2.9 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 40 1.5 2.5 5.4 M-O-R 4 172 6.3 10.7 16.1 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 316 11.6 19.6 35.7 CONSERVATIVE 6 811 29.8 50.4 86.1 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 224 8.2 13.9 100.0 . 1005 36.9 Missing NOT SURE 8 110 4.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1610 Missing cases 1115 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCRD8B Q11, political philosophy, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 4 .1 .3 .3 LIBERAL 2 25 .9 1.6 1.8 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 64 2.3 4.0 5.9 M-O-R 4 209 7.7 13.2 19.1 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 356 13.1 22.5 41.6 CONSERVATIVE 6 755 27.7 47.7 89.3 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 169 6.2 10.7 100.0 . 1044 38.3 Missing NOT SURE 8 99 3.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1582 Missing cases 1143 LCMD8B Q11, political philosophy, Michael Dukak Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 245 9.0 14.8 14.8 LIBERAL 2 623 22.9 37.6 52.4 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 449 16.5 27.1 79.5 M-O-R 4 245 9.0 14.8 94.3 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 48 1.8 2.9 97.2 CONSERVATIVE 6 36 1.3 2.2 99.4 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 10 .4 .6 100.0 . 1014 37.2 Missing NOT SURE 8 55 2.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1656 Missing cases 1069 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCAG8B Q11, political philosophy, Al Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 59 2.2 4.5 4.5 LIBERAL 2 320 11.7 24.5 29.0 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 324 11.9 24.8 53.9 M-O-R 4 318 11.7 24.4 78.2 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 184 6.8 14.1 92.3 CONSERVATIVE 6 84 3.1 6.4 98.8 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 16 .6 1.2 100.0 . 1098 40.3 Missing NOT SURE 8 322 11.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1305 Missing cases 1420 LCJJ8B Q11, political philosophy, Jesse Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 970 35.6 60.2 60.2 LIBERAL 2 452 16.6 28.0 88.2 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 94 3.4 5.8 94.0 M-O-R 4 54 2.0 3.3 97.4 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 11 .4 .7 98.1 CONSERVATIVE 6 22 .8 1.4 99.4 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 9 .3 .6 100.0 . 1031 37.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 82 3.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1612 Missing cases 1113 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCRR8B Q11, political philosophy, Ronald Reagan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 14 .5 .9 .9 LIBERAL 2 31 1.1 2.0 2.8 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 19 .7 1.2 4.1 M-O-R 4 63 2.3 4.0 8.0 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 87 3.2 5.5 13.5 CONSERVATIVE 6 629 23.1 39.8 53.4 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 737 27.0 46.6 100.0 . 1052 38.6 Missing NOT SURE 8 93 3.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1580 Missing cases 1145 LCPR8B Q11, political philosophy, Pat Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 16 .6 1.1 1.1 LIBERAL 2 29 1.1 2.1 3.2 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 27 1.0 1.9 5.1 M-O-R 4 58 2.1 4.1 9.3 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 63 2.3 4.5 13.8 CONSERVATIVE 6 245 9.0 17.5 31.3 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 963 35.3 68.7 100.0 . 1074 39.4 Missing NOT SURE 8 250 9.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1401 Missing cases 1324 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCAV8B Q11, political philosophy, average Ameri Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 5 .2 .3 .3 LIBERAL 2 49 1.8 3.1 3.4 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 185 6.8 11.6 15.0 M-O-R 4 630 23.1 39.6 54.6 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 560 20.6 35.2 89.8 CONSERVATIVE 6 153 5.6 9.6 99.4 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 9 .3 .6 100.0 . 1047 38.4 Missing NOT SURE 8 87 3.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1591 Missing cases 1134 LCRP8B Q11, political philosophy, Republican Pa Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 10 .4 .6 .6 LIBERAL 2 28 1.0 1.7 2.4 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 22 .8 1.4 3.7 M-O-R 4 77 2.8 4.8 8.5 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 351 12.9 21.8 30.4 CONSERVATIVE 6 843 30.9 52.5 82.8 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 276 10.1 17.2 100.0 . 1047 38.4 Missing NOT SURE 8 71 2.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1607 Missing cases 1118 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCDP8B Q11, political philosophy, Democratic Pa Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 203 7.4 12.2 12.2 LIBERAL 2 713 26.2 43.0 55.2 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 453 16.6 27.3 82.5 M-O-R 4 212 7.8 12.8 95.2 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 32 1.2 1.9 97.2 CONSERVATIVE 6 32 1.2 1.9 99.1 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 15 .6 .9 100.0 . 1023 37.5 Missing NOT SURE 8 42 1.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1660 Missing cases 1065 ACHGB8B Q12, achievement in govt, George Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 210 7.7 12.6 12.6 ABOVE AVERAGE 2 438 16.1 26.3 38.9 AVERAGE 3 454 16.7 27.3 66.1 BELOW AVERAGE 4 242 8.9 14.5 80.7 POOR 5 322 11.8 19.3 100.0 . 990 36.3 Missing NOT SURE 6 69 2.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1666 Missing cases 1059 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ACHRD8B Q12, achievement in govt, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 214 7.9 13.1 13.1 ABOVE AVERAGE 2 800 29.4 49.0 62.1 AVERAGE 3 471 17.3 28.8 90.9 BELOW AVERAGE 4 94 3.4 5.8 96.6 POOR 5 55 2.0 3.4 100.0 . 1013 37.2 Missing NOT SURE 6 78 2.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1634 Missing cases 1091 ACHMD8B Q12, achievement in govt, Michael Dukaki Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 122 4.5 7.5 7.5 ABOVE AVERAGE 2 652 23.9 39.9 47.4 AVERAGE 3 544 20.0 33.3 80.7 BELOW AVERAGE 4 189 6.9 11.6 92.3 POOR 5 126 4.6 7.7 100.0 . 991 36.4 Missing NOT SURE 6 101 3.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1633 Missing cases 1092 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ACHAG8B Q12, achievement in govt, Albert Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 27 1.0 2.0 2.0 ABOVE AVERAGE 2 260 9.5 19.7 21.8 AVERAGE 3 717 26.3 54.4 76.1 BELOW AVERAGE 4 240 8.8 18.2 94.3 POOR 5 75 2.8 5.7 100.0 . 1048 38.5 Missing NOT SURE 6 358 13.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1319 Missing cases 1406 ACHJJ8B Q12, achievement in govt, Jesse Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 39 1.4 2.8 2.8 ABOVE AVERAGE 2 165 6.1 11.8 14.6 AVERAGE 3 196 7.2 14.1 28.7 BELOW AVERAGE 4 248 9.1 17.8 46.5 POOR 5 747 27.4 53.5 100.0 . 1047 38.4 Missing NOT SURE 6 283 10.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1395 Missing cases 1330 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ACHPR8B Q12, achievement in govt, Pat Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 6 .2 .5 .5 ABOVE AVERAGE 2 26 1.0 2.0 2.4 AVERAGE 3 93 3.4 7.1 9.5 BELOW AVERAGE 4 225 8.3 17.1 26.6 POOR 5 968 35.5 73.4 100.0 . 1058 38.8 Missing NOT SURE 6 349 12.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1318 Missing cases 1407 TVGB8B Q12, TV performance, George Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 50 1.8 3.0 3.0 ABOVE AVERAGE 2 211 7.7 12.5 15.5 AVERAGE 3 652 23.9 38.7 54.2 BELOW AVERAGE 4 324 11.9 19.2 73.4 POOR 5 448 16.4 26.6 100.0 . 1000 36.7 Missing NOT SURE 6 40 1.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1685 Missing cases 1040 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TVRD8B Q12, TV performance, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 47 1.7 2.9 2.9 ABOVE AVERAGE 2 407 14.9 25.1 28.0 AVERAGE 3 772 28.3 47.6 75.6 BELOW AVERAGE 4 274 10.1 16.9 92.5 POOR 5 121 4.4 7.5 100.0 . 1032 37.9 Missing NOT SURE 6 72 2.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1621 Missing cases 1104 TVMD8B Q12, TV performance, Michael Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 98 3.6 5.9 5.9 ABOVE AVERAGE 2 596 21.9 35.7 41.5 AVERAGE 3 776 28.5 46.4 88.0 BELOW AVERAGE 4 151 5.5 9.0 97.0 POOR 5 50 1.8 3.0 100.0 . 1006 36.9 Missing NOT SURE 6 48 1.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1671 Missing cases 1054 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TVAG8B Q12, TV performance, Al Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 38 1.4 2.6 2.6 ABOVE AVERAGE 2 308 11.3 21.2 23.8 AVERAGE 3 737 27.0 50.8 74.6 BELOW AVERAGE 4 269 9.9 18.5 93.2 POOR 5 99 3.6 6.8 100.0 . 1055 38.7 Missing NOT SURE 6 219 8.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1451 Missing cases 1274 TVJJ8B Q12, TV performance, Jesse Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 465 17.1 28.2 28.2 ABOVE AVERAGE 2 669 24.6 40.5 68.7 AVERAGE 3 264 9.7 16.0 84.7 BELOW AVERAGE 4 122 4.5 7.4 92.1 POOR 5 131 4.8 7.9 100.0 . 1025 37.6 Missing NOT SURE 6 49 1.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1651 Missing cases 1074 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TVPR8B Q12, TV performance, Pat Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 79 2.9 5.1 5.1 ABOVE AVERAGE 2 369 13.5 23.7 28.8 AVERAGE 3 391 14.3 25.1 53.9 BELOW AVERAGE 4 260 9.5 16.7 70.6 POOR 5 458 16.8 29.4 100.0 . 1041 38.2 Missing NOT SURE 6 127 4.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1557 Missing cases 1168 MORGB8B Q12, moral character, George Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 309 11.3 19.5 19.5 ABOVE AVERAGE 2 449 16.5 28.4 47.9 AVERAGE 3 514 18.9 32.5 80.4 BELOW AVERAGE 4 135 5.0 8.5 88.9 POOR 5 176 6.5 11.1 100.0 . 999 36.7 Missing NOT SURE 6 143 5.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1583 Missing cases 1142 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MORRD8B Q12, moral character, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 239 8.8 15.1 15.1 ABOVE AVERAGE 2 584 21.4 36.9 52.1 AVERAGE 3 619 22.7 39.2 91.2 BELOW AVERAGE 4 95 3.5 6.0 97.2 POOR 5 44 1.6 2.8 100.0 . 1015 37.2 Missing NOT SURE 6 129 4.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1581 Missing cases 1144 MORMD8B Q12, moral character, Michael Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 232 8.5 15.0 15.0 ABOVE AVERAGE 2 674 24.7 43.5 58.4 AVERAGE 3 528 19.4 34.0 92.5 BELOW AVERAGE 4 70 2.6 4.5 97.0 POOR 5 47 1.7 3.0 100.0 . 997 36.6 Missing NOT SURE 6 177 6.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1551 Missing cases 1174 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MORAG8B Q12, moral character, Al Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 103 3.8 8.0 8.0 ABOVE AVERAGE 2 466 17.1 36.2 44.2 AVERAGE 3 601 22.1 46.7 90.9 BELOW AVERAGE 4 84 3.1 6.5 97.4 POOR 5 33 1.2 2.6 100.0 . 1041 38.2 Missing NOT SURE 6 397 14.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1287 Missing cases 1438 MORJJ8B Q12, moral character, Jesse Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 172 6.3 11.3 11.3 ABOVE AVERAGE 2 447 16.4 29.4 40.7 AVERAGE 3 528 19.4 34.7 75.4 BELOW AVERAGE 4 173 6.3 11.4 86.8 POOR 5 201 7.4 13.2 100.0 . 1008 37.0 Missing NOT SURE 6 196 7.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1521 Missing cases 1204 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MORPR8B Q12, moral character, Pat Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 124 4.6 8.5 8.5 ABOVE AVERAGE 2 341 12.5 23.4 31.8 AVERAGE 3 484 17.8 33.2 65.0 BELOW AVERAGE 4 213 7.8 14.6 79.6 POOR 5 298 10.9 20.4 100.0 . 1024 37.6 Missing NOT SURE 6 241 8.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1460 Missing cases 1265 FPOLGB8B Q12, knows foreign policy, George Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 407 14.9 24.4 24.4 ABOVE AVERAGE 2 685 25.1 41.1 65.5 AVERAGE 3 370 13.6 22.2 87.8 BELOW AVERAGE 4 110 4.0 6.6 94.4 POOR 5 94 3.4 5.6 100.0 . 992 36.4 Missing NOT SURE 6 67 2.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1666 Missing cases 1059 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FPOLRD8B Q12, knows foreign policy, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 193 7.1 12.0 12.0 ABOVE AVERAGE 2 826 30.3 51.2 63.1 AVERAGE 3 513 18.8 31.8 94.9 BELOW AVERAGE 4 63 2.3 3.9 98.8 POOR 5 19 .7 1.2 100.0 . 1025 37.6 Missing NOT SURE 6 86 3.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1614 Missing cases 1111 FPOLMD8B Q12, knows foreign policy, Michael Dukak Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 34 1.2 2.1 2.1 ABOVE AVERAGE 2 237 8.7 14.6 16.7 AVERAGE 3 746 27.4 46.1 62.9 BELOW AVERAGE 4 327 12.0 20.2 83.1 POOR 5 274 10.1 16.9 100.0 . 1004 36.8 Missing NOT SURE 6 103 3.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1618 Missing cases 1107 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FPOLAG8B Q12, knows foreign policy, Al Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 32 1.2 2.4 2.4 ABOVE AVERAGE 2 282 10.3 21.2 23.6 AVERAGE 3 648 23.8 48.7 72.3 BELOW AVERAGE 4 273 10.0 20.5 92.8 POOR 5 96 3.5 7.2 100.0 . 1053 38.6 Missing NOT SURE 6 341 12.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1331 Missing cases 1394 FPOLJJ8B Q12, knows foreign policy, Jesse Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 55 2.0 3.5 3.5 ABOVE AVERAGE 2 287 10.5 18.2 21.7 AVERAGE 3 366 13.4 23.2 44.9 BELOW AVERAGE 4 365 13.4 23.1 68.0 POOR 5 504 18.5 32.0 100.0 . 1035 38.0 Missing NOT SURE 6 113 4.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1577 Missing cases 1148 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FPOLPR8B Q12, knows foreign policy, Pat Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 17 .6 1.2 1.2 ABOVE AVERAGE 2 65 2.4 4.4 5.6 AVERAGE 3 166 6.1 11.3 16.9 BELOW AVERAGE 4 363 13.3 24.7 41.6 POOR 5 856 31.4 58.4 100.0 . 1038 38.1 Missing NOT SURE 6 220 8.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1467 Missing cases 1258 EVALGB8B Q12, evaluation, George Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 209 7.7 12.5 12.5 ABOVE AVERAGE 2 466 17.1 27.9 40.5 AVERAGE 3 452 16.6 27.1 67.6 BELOW AVERAGE 4 222 8.1 13.3 80.9 POOR 5 319 11.7 19.1 100.0 . 1014 37.2 Missing NOT SURE 6 43 1.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1668 Missing cases 1057 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALRD8B Q12, evaluation, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 127 4.7 7.8 7.8 ABOVE AVERAGE 2 660 24.2 40.6 48.4 AVERAGE 3 598 21.9 36.8 85.2 BELOW AVERAGE 4 150 5.5 9.2 94.5 POOR 5 90 3.3 5.5 100.0 . 1043 38.3 Missing NOT SURE 6 57 2.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1625 Missing cases 1100 EVALMD8B Q12, evaluation, Michael Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 136 5.0 8.1 8.1 ABOVE AVERAGE 2 626 23.0 37.4 45.5 AVERAGE 3 549 20.1 32.8 78.4 BELOW AVERAGE 4 213 7.8 12.7 91.1 POOR 5 149 5.5 8.9 100.0 . 1013 37.2 Missing NOT SURE 6 39 1.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1673 Missing cases 1052 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALAG8B Q12, evaluation, Al Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 29 1.1 2.1 2.1 ABOVE AVERAGE 2 240 8.8 17.2 19.2 AVERAGE 3 701 25.7 50.1 69.3 BELOW AVERAGE 4 309 11.3 22.1 91.4 POOR 5 120 4.4 8.6 100.0 . 1076 39.5 Missing NOT SURE 6 250 9.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1399 Missing cases 1326 EVALJJ8B Q12, evaluation, Jesse Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 91 3.3 5.7 5.7 ABOVE AVERAGE 2 338 12.4 21.0 26.7 AVERAGE 3 393 14.4 24.5 51.2 BELOW AVERAGE 4 326 12.0 20.3 71.4 POOR 5 459 16.8 28.6 100.0 . 1049 38.5 Missing NOT SURE 6 69 2.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1607 Missing cases 1118 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALRR8B Q12, evaluation, Ronald Reagan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 260 9.5 15.9 15.9 ABOVE AVERAGE 2 344 12.6 21.0 36.8 AVERAGE 3 299 11.0 18.2 55.1 BELOW AVERAGE 4 223 8.2 13.6 68.7 POOR 5 514 18.9 31.3 100.0 . 1043 38.3 Missing NOT SURE 6 42 1.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1640 Missing cases 1085 EVALPR8B Q12, evaluation, Pat Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 22 .8 1.5 1.5 ABOVE AVERAGE 2 90 3.3 6.0 7.5 AVERAGE 3 250 9.2 16.6 24.1 BELOW AVERAGE 4 318 11.7 21.2 45.2 POOR 5 823 30.2 54.8 100.0 . 1063 39.0 Missing NOT SURE 6 159 5.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1503 Missing cases 1222 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MIQUAL8B Q13, most important quality Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACHIEVEMENT 1 926 34.0 54.0 54.0 TV PERFORM 2 8 .3 .5 54.5 MORAL CHAR 3 583 21.4 34.0 88.5 KNOWS FORPOL 4 198 7.3 11.5 100.0 . 1010 37.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1715 Missing cases 1010 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - METGB8B Q14, met personally, George Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1605 58.9 86.9 86.9 CHECKED 1 241 8.8 13.1 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 RALGB8B Q14, attended rally, George Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1532 56.2 83.0 83.0 CHECKED 1 314 11.5 17.0 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTGB8B Q14, contacted by, George Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1474 54.1 79.8 79.8 CHECKED 1 372 13.7 20.2 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MAILGB8B Q14, received mail, George Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1272 46.7 68.9 68.9 CHECKED 1 574 21.1 31.1 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 ADGB8B Q14, saw ad, George Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 930 34.1 50.4 50.4 CHECKED 1 916 33.6 49.6 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - READGB8B Q14, read article, George Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 475 17.4 25.7 25.7 CHECKED 1 1371 50.3 74.3 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - METRD8B Q14, met personally, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1638 60.1 88.7 88.7 CHECKED 1 208 7.6 11.3 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 RALRD8B Q14, attended rally, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1615 59.3 87.5 87.5 CHECKED 1 231 8.5 12.5 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTRD8B Q14, contacted by, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1570 57.6 85.0 85.0 CHECKED 1 276 10.1 15.0 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MAILRD8B Q14, received mail, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1327 48.7 71.9 71.9 CHECKED 1 519 19.0 28.1 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 ADRD8B Q14, saw ad, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 951 34.9 51.5 51.5 CHECKED 1 895 32.8 48.5 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - READRD8B Q14, read article, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 539 19.8 29.2 29.2 CHECKED 1 1307 48.0 70.8 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - METMD8B Q14, met personally, Michael Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1749 64.2 94.7 94.7 CHECKED 1 97 3.6 5.3 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 RALMD8B Q14, attended rally, Michael Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1712 62.8 92.7 92.7 CHECKED 1 134 4.9 7.3 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTMD8B Q14, contacted by, Michael Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1485 54.5 80.4 80.4 CHECKED 1 361 13.2 19.6 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MAILMD8B Q14, received mail, Michael Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1403 51.5 76.0 76.0 CHECKED 1 443 16.3 24.0 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 ADMD8B Q14, saw ad, Michael Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 906 33.2 49.1 49.1 CHECKED 1 940 34.5 50.9 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - READMD8B Q14, read article, Michael Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 483 17.7 26.2 26.2 CHECKED 1 1363 50.0 73.8 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - METAG8B Q14, met personally, Al Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1796 65.9 97.3 97.3 CHECKED 1 50 1.8 2.7 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 RALAG8B Q14, attended rally, Al Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1772 65.0 96.0 96.0 CHECKED 1 74 2.7 4.0 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTAG8B Q14, contacted by, Al Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1729 63.4 93.7 93.7 CHECKED 1 117 4.3 6.3 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MAILAG8B Q14, received mail, Al Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1608 59.0 87.1 87.1 CHECKED 1 238 8.7 12.9 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 ADAG8B Q14, saw ad, Al Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1004 36.8 54.4 54.4 CHECKED 1 842 30.9 45.6 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - READAG8B Q14, read article, Al Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 633 23.2 34.3 34.3 CHECKED 1 1213 44.5 65.7 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - METJJ8B Q14, met personally, Jesse Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1770 65.0 95.9 95.9 CHECKED 1 76 2.8 4.1 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 RALJJ8B Q14, attended rally, Jesse Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1686 61.9 91.3 91.3 CHECKED 1 160 5.9 8.7 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTJJ8B Q14, contacted by, Jesse Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1699 62.3 92.0 92.0 CHECKED 1 147 5.4 8.0 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MAILJJ8B Q14, received mail, Jesse Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1584 58.1 85.8 85.8 CHECKED 1 262 9.6 14.2 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 ADJJ8B Q14, saw ad, Jesse Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 947 34.8 51.3 51.3 CHECKED 1 899 33.0 48.7 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - READJJ8B Q14, read article, Jesse Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 492 18.1 26.7 26.7 CHECKED 1 1354 49.7 73.3 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - METPR8B Q14, met personally, Pat Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1757 64.5 95.2 95.2 CHECKED 1 89 3.3 4.8 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 RALPR8B Q14, attended rally, Pat Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1706 62.6 92.4 92.4 CHECKED 1 140 5.1 7.6 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTPR8B Q14, contacted by, Pat Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1645 60.4 89.1 89.1 CHECKED 1 201 7.4 10.9 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MAILPR8B Q14, received mail, Pat Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1437 52.7 77.8 77.8 CHECKED 1 409 15.0 22.2 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 ADPR8B Q14, saw ad, Pat Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 924 33.9 50.1 50.1 CHECKED 1 922 33.8 49.9 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - READPR8B Q14, read article, Pat Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 548 20.1 29.7 29.7 CHECKED 1 1298 47.6 70.3 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RANKMD8B Q15, rank Michael Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST CHOICE 1 625 22.9 59.3 59.3 SECOND CHOICE 2 315 11.6 29.9 89.2 THIRD CHOICE 3 114 4.2 10.8 100.0 . 1671 61.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1054 Missing cases 1671 RANKRG8B Q15, rank Richard Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST CHOICE 1 100 3.7 16.1 16.1 SECOND CHOICE 2 237 8.7 38.2 54.4 THIRD CHOICE 3 283 10.4 45.6 100.0 . 2105 77.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 620 Missing cases 2105 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RANKAG8B Q15, rank Al Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST CHOICE 1 116 4.3 19.7 19.7 SECOND CHOICE 2 193 7.1 32.7 52.4 THIRD CHOICE 3 281 10.3 47.6 100.0 . 2135 78.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 590 Missing cases 2135 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RANKJJ8B Q15, rank Jesse Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST CHOICE 1 139 5.1 23.7 23.7 SECOND CHOICE 2 201 7.4 34.2 57.9 THIRD CHOICE 3 247 9.1 42.1 100.0 . 2138 78.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 587 Missing cases 2138 RANKPS8B Q15, rank Paul Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST CHOICE 1 150 5.5 21.8 21.8 SECOND CHOICE 2 200 7.3 29.0 50.8 THIRD CHOICE 3 339 12.4 49.2 100.0 . 2036 74.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 689 Missing cases 2036 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RANKGB8B Q15, rank George Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST CHOICE 1 464 17.0 49.3 49.3 SECOND CHOICE 2 275 10.1 29.2 78.5 THIRD CHOICE 3 202 7.4 21.5 100.0 . 1784 65.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 941 Missing cases 1784 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RANKRD8B Q15, rank Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST CHOICE 1 376 13.8 40.6 40.6 SECOND CHOICE 2 384 14.1 41.5 82.2 THIRD CHOICE 3 165 6.1 17.8 100.0 . 1800 66.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 925 Missing cases 1800 RANKPD8B Q15, rank Pete DuPont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST CHOICE 1 55 2.0 10.5 10.5 SECOND CHOICE 2 153 5.6 29.3 39.8 THIRD CHOICE 3 314 11.5 60.2 100.0 . 2203 80.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 522 Missing cases 2203 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RANKJK8B Q15, rank Jack Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST CHOICE 1 120 4.4 17.7 17.7 SECOND CHOICE 2 191 7.0 28.1 45.8 THIRD CHOICE 3 368 13.5 54.2 100.0 . 2046 75.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 679 Missing cases 2046 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RANKPR8B Q15, rank Pat Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST CHOICE 1 32 1.2 11.1 11.1 SECOND CHOICE 2 44 1.6 15.3 26.5 THIRD CHOICE 3 211 7.7 73.5 100.0 . 2438 89.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 287 Missing cases 2438 NOMMD8B Q16, nom chances, Michael Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 1177 43.2 67.7 67.7 PROBABLY WIN 2 327 12.0 18.8 86.5 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 95 3.5 5.5 92.0 TOSSUP 4 75 2.8 4.3 96.3 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 27 1.0 1.6 97.9 PROBABLY LOSE 6 29 1.1 1.7 99.5 CERTAIN LOSE 7 8 .3 .5 100.0 . 978 35.9 Missing NOT SURE 8 9 .3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1738 Missing cases 987 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOMAG8B Q16, nom chances, Al Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 9 .3 .6 .6 PROBABLY WIN 2 33 1.2 2.3 2.9 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 57 2.1 3.9 6.8 TOSSUP 4 75 2.8 5.1 11.9 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 151 5.5 10.3 22.2 PROBABLY LOSE 6 229 8.4 15.6 37.8 CERTAIN LOSE 7 910 33.4 62.2 100.0 . 1149 42.2 Missing NOT SURE 8 112 4.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1464 Missing cases 1261 NOMJJ8B Q16, nom chances, Jesse Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 11 .4 .7 .7 PROBABLY WIN 2 35 1.3 2.3 3.0 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 88 3.2 5.8 8.9 TOSSUP 4 129 4.7 8.5 17.4 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 254 9.3 16.8 34.2 PROBABLY LOSE 6 303 11.1 20.1 54.3 CERTAIN LOSE 7 691 25.4 45.7 100.0 . 1136 41.7 Missing NOT SURE 8 78 2.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1511 Missing cases 1214 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOMGB8B Q16, nom chances, George Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 1101 40.4 66.3 66.3 PROBABLY WIN 2 188 6.9 11.3 77.6 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 81 3.0 4.9 82.5 TOSSUP 4 86 3.2 5.2 87.7 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 80 2.9 4.8 92.5 PROBABLY LOSE 6 39 1.4 2.3 94.8 CERTAIN LOSE 7 86 3.2 5.2 100.0 . 1036 38.0 Missing NOT SURE 8 28 1.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1661 Missing cases 1064 NOMRD8B Q16, nom chances, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 16 .6 1.1 1.1 PROBABLY WIN 2 61 2.2 4.1 5.1 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 114 4.2 7.6 12.7 TOSSUP 4 155 5.7 10.3 23.1 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 228 8.4 15.2 38.3 PROBABLY LOSE 6 224 8.2 14.9 53.2 CERTAIN LOSE 7 701 25.7 46.8 100.0 . 1153 42.3 Missing NOT SURE 8 73 2.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1499 Missing cases 1226 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOMPR8B Q16, nom chances, Pat Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 2 .1 .1 .1 PROBABLY WIN 2 6 .2 .4 .5 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 18 .7 1.2 1.7 TOSSUP 4 27 1.0 1.8 3.6 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 86 3.2 5.8 9.3 PROBABLY LOSE 6 155 5.7 10.4 19.7 CERTAIN LOSE 7 1196 43.9 80.3 100.0 . 1157 42.5 Missing NOT SURE 8 78 2.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1490 Missing cases 1235 NOVMD8B Q16, ge chances, Michael Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 411 15.1 24.4 24.4 PROBABLY WIN 2 394 14.5 23.4 47.8 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 215 7.9 12.8 60.6 TOSSUP 4 368 13.5 21.9 82.4 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 178 6.5 10.6 93.0 PROBABLY LOSE 6 82 3.0 4.9 97.9 CERTAIN LOSE 7 36 1.3 2.1 100.0 . 1014 37.2 Missing NOT SURE 8 27 1.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1684 Missing cases 1041 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOVAG8B Q16, ge chances, Al Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 26 1.0 1.9 1.9 PROBABLY WIN 2 56 2.1 4.1 6.0 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 95 3.5 6.9 12.9 TOSSUP 4 141 5.2 10.3 23.1 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 220 8.1 16.0 39.1 PROBABLY LOSE 6 265 9.7 19.3 58.4 CERTAIN LOSE 7 572 21.0 41.6 100.0 . 1225 45.0 Missing NOT SURE 8 125 4.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1375 Missing cases 1350 NOVJJ8B Q16, ge chances, Jesse Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 16 .6 1.1 1.1 PROBABLY WIN 2 46 1.7 3.2 4.3 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 63 2.3 4.4 8.6 TOSSUP 4 133 4.9 9.2 17.8 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 257 9.4 17.8 35.6 PROBABLY LOSE 6 255 9.4 17.6 53.3 CERTAIN LOSE 7 676 24.8 46.7 100.0 . 1208 44.3 Missing NOT SURE 8 71 2.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1446 Missing cases 1279 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOVGB8B Q16, ge chances, George Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 270 9.9 16.6 16.6 PROBABLY WIN 2 257 9.4 15.8 32.4 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 196 7.2 12.1 44.5 TOSSUP 4 408 15.0 25.1 69.6 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 273 10.0 16.8 86.4 PROBABLY LOSE 6 126 4.6 7.8 94.2 CERTAIN LOSE 7 95 3.5 5.8 100.0 . 1056 38.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 44 1.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1625 Missing cases 1100 NOVRD8B Q16, ge chances, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 38 1.4 2.7 2.7 PROBABLY WIN 2 130 4.8 9.2 11.9 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 225 8.3 15.9 27.9 TOSSUP 4 302 11.1 21.4 49.3 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 218 8.0 15.5 64.7 PROBABLY LOSE 6 166 6.1 11.8 76.5 CERTAIN LOSE 7 332 12.2 23.5 100.0 . 1230 45.1 Missing NOT SURE 8 84 3.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1411 Missing cases 1314 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOVPR8B Q16, ge chances, Pat Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 1 .0 .1 .1 PROBABLY WIN 2 9 .3 .6 .7 MORE LIKELY WIN 3 33 1.2 2.4 3.1 TOSSUP 4 32 1.2 2.3 5.3 MORE LIKELY LOSE 5 125 4.6 8.9 14.3 PROBABLY LOSE 6 161 5.9 11.5 25.7 CERTAIN LOSE 7 1042 38.2 74.3 100.0 . 1227 45.0 Missing NOT SURE 8 95 3.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1403 Missing cases 1322 PTYSP8B Q17, spouse's party identification Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACTIVE DEM 1 435 16.0 30.5 30.5 INCACTIVE DEM 2 268 9.8 18.8 49.3 ACTIVE REP 3 380 13.9 26.6 75.9 INACTIVE REP 4 209 7.7 14.7 90.6 ACTIVE IND 5 46 1.7 3.2 93.8 INACTIVE IND 6 88 3.2 6.2 100.0 . 1272 46.7 Missing NOT SURE 7 27 1.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1426 Missing cases 1299 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PTYM8B Q17, mother's party identification Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACTIVE DEM 1 203 7.4 15.7 15.7 INCACTIVE DEM 2 434 15.9 33.6 49.3 ACTIVE REP 3 149 5.5 11.5 60.8 INACTIVE REP 4 361 13.2 27.9 88.8 ACTIVE IND 5 42 1.5 3.3 92.0 INACTIVE IND 6 103 3.8 8.0 100.0 . 1339 49.1 Missing NOT SURE 7 94 3.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1292 Missing cases 1433 PTYF8B Q17, father's party identification Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACTIVE DEM 1 232 8.5 19.0 19.0 INCACTIVE DEM 2 368 13.5 30.2 49.3 ACTIVE REP 3 179 6.6 14.7 64.0 INACTIVE REP 4 322 11.8 26.4 90.4 ACTIVE IND 5 38 1.4 3.1 93.5 INACTIVE IND 6 79 2.9 6.5 100.0 . 1430 52.5 Missing NOT SURE 7 77 2.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1218 Missing cases 1507 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANSUP8B Q18, candidate initially supported Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BRUCE BABBITT 1 71 2.6 4.2 4.2 GEORGE BUSH 2 310 11.4 18.5 22.8 ROBERT DOLE 3 167 6.1 10.0 32.8 MICHAEL DUKAKIS 4 273 10.0 16.3 49.1 PETE DUPONT 5 30 1.1 1.8 50.9 RICHARD GEPHARDT 6 123 4.5 7.4 58.2 AL GORE 7 109 4.0 6.5 64.7 ALEXANDER HAIG 8 5 .2 .3 65.0 GARY HART 9 17 .6 1.0 66.0 JESSE JACKSON 10 155 5.7 9.3 75.3 JACK KEMP 11 105 3.9 6.3 81.6 PAT ROBERTSON 12 28 1.0 1.7 83.3 PAUL SIMON 13 130 4.8 7.8 91.0 NONE, NONPART 14 150 5.5 9.0 100.0 . 1052 38.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1673 Missing cases 1052 ATTBB8B Q19, attended rally, Bruce Babbitt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1757 64.5 95.2 95.2 CHECKED 1 89 3.3 4.8 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDBB8B Q19, fundraising, Bruce Babbitt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1839 67.5 99.6 99.6 CHECKED 1 7 .3 .4 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVBB8B Q19, convince friends, Bruce Babbitt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1791 65.7 97.0 97.0 CHECKED 1 55 2.0 3.0 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 CANVBB8B Q19, canvassing, Bruce Babbitt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1834 67.3 99.3 99.3 CHECKED 1 12 .4 .7 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONBB8B Q19, contributed money, Bruce Babbitt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1825 67.0 98.9 98.9 CHECKED 1 21 .8 1.1 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTMD8B Q19, attended rally, Michael Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1671 61.3 90.5 90.5 CHECKED 1 175 6.4 9.5 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 FUNDMD8B Q19, fundraising, Michael Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1800 66.1 97.5 97.5 CHECKED 1 46 1.7 2.5 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVMD8B Q19, convince friends, Michael Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1558 57.2 84.4 84.4 CHECKED 1 288 10.6 15.6 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVMD8B Q19, canvassing, Michael Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1801 66.1 97.6 97.6 CHECKED 1 45 1.7 2.4 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 MONMD8B Q19, contributed money, Michael Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1732 63.6 93.8 93.8 CHECKED 1 114 4.2 6.2 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTRG8B Q19, attended rally, Richard Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1720 63.1 93.2 93.2 CHECKED 1 126 4.6 6.8 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDRG8B Q19, fundraising, Richard Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1818 66.7 98.5 98.5 CHECKED 1 28 1.0 1.5 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 CONVRG8B Q19, convince friends, Richard Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1762 64.7 95.4 95.4 CHECKED 1 84 3.1 4.6 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVRG8B Q19, canvassing, Richard Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1830 67.2 99.1 99.1 CHECKED 1 16 .6 .9 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONRG8B Q19, contributed money, Richard Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1794 65.8 97.2 97.2 CHECKED 1 52 1.9 2.8 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 ATTAG8B Q19, attended rally, Al Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1762 64.7 95.4 95.4 CHECKED 1 84 3.1 4.6 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDAG8B Q19, fundraising, Al Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1831 67.2 99.2 99.2 CHECKED 1 15 .6 .8 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVAG8B Q19, convince friends, Al Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1766 64.8 95.7 95.7 CHECKED 1 80 2.9 4.3 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 CANVAG8B Q19, canvassing, Al Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1835 67.3 99.4 99.4 CHECKED 1 11 .4 .6 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONAG8B Q19, contributed money, Al Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1821 66.8 98.6 98.6 CHECKED 1 25 .9 1.4 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTGH8B Q19, attended rally, Gary Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1804 66.2 97.7 97.7 CHECKED 1 42 1.5 2.3 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 FUNDGH8B Q19, fundraising, Gary Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1838 67.4 99.6 99.6 CHECKED 1 8 .3 .4 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVGH8B Q19, convince friends, Gary Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1827 67.0 99.0 99.0 CHECKED 1 19 .7 1.0 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVGH8B Q19, canvassing, Gary Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1842 67.6 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 4 .1 .2 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 MONGH8B Q19, contributed money, Gary Hart Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1826 67.0 98.9 98.9 CHECKED 1 20 .7 1.1 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTJJ8B Q19, attended rally, Jesse Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1701 62.4 92.1 92.1 CHECKED 1 145 5.3 7.9 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDJJ8B Q19, fundraising, Jesse Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1829 67.1 99.1 99.1 CHECKED 1 17 .6 .9 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 CONVJJ8B Q19, convince friends, Jesse Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1720 63.1 93.2 93.2 CHECKED 1 126 4.6 6.8 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVJJ8B Q19, canvassing, Jesse Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1822 66.9 98.7 98.7 CHECKED 1 24 .9 1.3 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONJJ8B Q19, contributed money, Jesse Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1765 64.8 95.6 95.6 CHECKED 1 81 3.0 4.4 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 ATTPS8B Q19, attended rally, Paul Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1719 63.1 93.1 93.1 CHECKED 1 127 4.7 6.9 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDPS8B Q19, fundraising, Paul Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1827 67.0 99.0 99.0 CHECKED 1 19 .7 1.0 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVPS8B Q19, convince friends, Paul Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1754 64.4 95.0 95.0 CHECKED 1 92 3.4 5.0 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 CANVPS8B Q19, canvassing, Paul Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1823 66.9 98.8 98.8 CHECKED 1 23 .8 1.2 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONPS8B Q19, contributed money, Paul Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1784 65.5 96.6 96.6 CHECKED 1 62 2.3 3.4 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTGB8B Q19, attended rally, George Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1520 55.8 82.3 82.3 CHECKED 1 326 12.0 17.7 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 FUNDGB8B Q19, fundraising, George Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1729 63.4 93.7 93.7 CHECKED 1 117 4.3 6.3 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVGB8B Q19, convince friends, George Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1551 56.9 84.0 84.0 CHECKED 1 295 10.8 16.0 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVGB8B Q19, canvassing, George Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1752 64.3 94.9 94.9 CHECKED 1 94 3.4 5.1 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 MONGB8B Q19, contributed money, George Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1642 60.3 88.9 88.9 CHECKED 1 204 7.5 11.1 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTRD8B Q19, attended rally, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1690 62.0 91.5 91.5 CHECKED 1 156 5.7 8.5 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDRD8B Q19, fundraising, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1800 66.1 97.5 97.5 CHECKED 1 46 1.7 2.5 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 CONVRD8B Q19, convince friends, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1726 63.3 93.5 93.5 CHECKED 1 120 4.4 6.5 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVRD8B Q19, canvassing, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1812 66.5 98.2 98.2 CHECKED 1 34 1.2 1.8 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONRD8B Q19, contributed money, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1766 64.8 95.7 95.7 CHECKED 1 80 2.9 4.3 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 ATTPD8B Q19, attended rally, Pete DuPont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1795 65.9 97.2 97.2 CHECKED 1 51 1.9 2.8 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDPD8B Q19, fundraising, Pete DuPont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1844 67.7 99.9 99.9 CHECKED 1 2 .1 .1 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVPD8B Q19, convince friends, Pete DuPont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1817 66.7 98.4 98.4 CHECKED 1 29 1.1 1.6 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 CANVPD8B Q19, canvassing, Pete DuPont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1844 67.7 99.9 99.9 CHECKED 1 2 .1 .1 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONPD8B Q19, contributed money, Pete DuPont Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1835 67.3 99.4 99.4 CHECKED 1 11 .4 .6 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTAH8B Q19, attended rally, Alexander Haig Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1813 66.5 98.2 98.2 CHECKED 1 33 1.2 1.8 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 FUNDAH8B Q19, fundraising, Alexander Haig Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1845 67.7 99.9 99.9 CHECKED 1 1 .0 .1 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVAH8B Q19, convince friends, Alexander Haig Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1840 67.5 99.7 99.7 CHECKED 1 6 .2 .3 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVAH8B Q19, canvassing, Alexander Haig Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1845 67.7 99.9 99.9 CHECKED 1 1 .0 .1 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 MONAH8B Q19, contributed money, Alexander Haig Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1846 67.7 100.0 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTJK8B Q19, attended rally, Jack Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1726 63.3 93.5 93.5 CHECKED 1 120 4.4 6.5 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDJK8B Q19, fundraising, Jack Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1812 66.5 98.2 98.2 CHECKED 1 34 1.2 1.8 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 CONVJK8B Q19, convince friends, Jack Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1766 64.8 95.7 95.7 CHECKED 1 80 2.9 4.3 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVJK8B Q19, canvassing, Jack Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1821 66.8 98.6 98.6 CHECKED 1 25 .9 1.4 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONJK8B Q19, convince friends, Jack Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1792 65.8 97.1 97.1 CHECKED 1 54 2.0 2.9 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 ATTPR8B Q19, attended rally, Pat Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1771 65.0 95.9 95.9 CHECKED 1 75 2.8 4.1 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDPR8B Q19, fundraising, Pat Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1841 67.6 99.7 99.7 CHECKED 1 5 .2 .3 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVPR8B Q19, convince friends, Pat Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1824 66.9 98.8 98.8 CHECKED 1 22 .8 1.2 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 CANVPR8B Q19, canvassing, Pat Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1840 67.5 99.7 99.7 CHECKED 1 6 .2 .3 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONPR8B Q19, contributed money, Pat Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1822 66.9 98.7 98.7 CHECKED 1 24 .9 1.3 100.0 . 879 32.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1846 Missing cases 879 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TRUST8B Q20, trust in government? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ABOUT ALWAYS 1 24 .9 1.4 1.4 MOST OF TIME 2 628 23.0 35.4 36.7 SOME OF TIME 3 972 35.7 54.7 91.4 ALMOST NEVER 4 152 5.6 8.6 100.0 . 949 34.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1776 Missing cases 949 GOVRUN8B Q21, how is the government run? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BY BIG INTERESTS 1 1214 44.6 70.3 70.3 FOR ALL THE PEOPLE 2 513 18.8 29.7 100.0 . 998 36.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1727 Missing cases 998 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVLEXP8B Q22, evaluate nomination experience Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY POSITIVE 1 386 14.2 24.2 24.2 MORE POS THAN NEG 2 654 24.0 41.0 65.2 NEUTRAL EXPERIENCE 3 361 13.2 22.6 87.8 MORE NEG THAN POS 4 137 5.0 8.6 96.4 VERY NEGATIVE 5 57 2.1 3.6 100.0 . 1130 41.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1595 Missing cases 1130 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WKFALL8B willing to work for party in the fall? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 1129 41.4 65.4 65.4 NO 2 596 21.9 34.6 100.0 . 1000 36.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1725 Missing cases 1000 MONTH8B month Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 15 .6 .8 .8 4 1 .0 .1 .9 5 15 .6 .8 1.7 6 1328 48.7 74.4 76.1 7 418 15.3 23.4 99.5 8 6 .2 .3 99.8 9 1 .0 .1 99.9 16 1 .0 .1 99.9 18 1 .0 .1 100.0 . 939 34.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1786 Missing cases 939 DAY8B day Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 9 .3 .5 .5 1 38 1.4 2.1 2.6 2 21 .8 1.2 3.8 3 10 .4 .6 4.4 4 16 .6 .9 5.3 5 23 .8 1.3 6.6 6 20 .7 1.1 7.7 7 36 1.3 2.0 9.8 8 29 1.1 1.6 11.4 9 38 1.4 2.1 13.5 10 32 1.2 1.8 15.3 11 32 1.2 1.8 17.1 12 27 1.0 1.5 18.7 13 17 .6 1.0 19.6 14 19 .7 1.1 20.7 15 11 .4 .6 21.3 16 15 .6 .8 22.2 17 46 1.7 2.6 24.7 18 125 4.6 7.0 31.8 19 52 1.9 2.9 34.7 20 160 5.9 9.0 43.7 21 108 4.0 6.1 49.8 22 223 8.2 12.6 62.4 23 171 6.3 9.6 72.0 24 142 5.2 8.0 80.0 25 72 2.6 4.1 84.1 26 56 2.1 3.2 87.3 27 78 2.9 4.4 91.7 28 53 1.9 3.0 94.6 29 48 1.8 2.7 97.4 30 43 1.6 2.4 99.8 31 4 .1 .2 100.0 . 951 34.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1774 Missing cases 951 RSPN88B Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO .00 879 32.3 32.3 32.3 YES 1.00 1846 67.7 67.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 *1988C* ATTMD8C Q1, attended rally, Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1573 57.7 82.5 82.5 CHECKED 1 334 12.3 17.5 100.0 . 818 30.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDMD8C Q1, fundraising, Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1804 66.2 94.6 94.6 CHECKED 1 103 3.8 5.4 100.0 . 818 30.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVMD8C Q1, convince friends, Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1460 53.6 76.6 76.6 CHECKED 1 447 16.4 23.4 100.0 . 818 30.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 CANVMD8C Q1, canvass, Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1789 65.7 93.8 93.8 CHECKED 1 118 4.3 6.2 100.0 . 818 30.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONMD8C Q1, contribute, Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1662 61.0 87.2 87.2 CHECKED 1 245 9.0 12.8 100.0 . 818 30.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTJJ8C Q1, attended rally, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1759 64.6 92.2 92.2 CHECKED 1 148 5.4 7.8 100.0 . 818 30.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 FUNDJJ8C Q1, fundraising, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1879 69.0 98.5 98.5 CHECKED 1 28 1.0 1.5 100.0 . 818 30.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVJJ8C Q1, convince friends, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1784 65.5 93.6 93.6 CHECKED 1 123 4.5 6.4 100.0 . 818 30.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVJJ8C Q1, canvass, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1883 69.1 98.7 98.7 CHECKED 1 24 .9 1.3 100.0 . 818 30.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 MONJJ8C Q1, contribute, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1833 67.3 96.1 96.1 CHECKED 1 74 2.7 3.9 100.0 . 818 30.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTPS8C Q1, attended rally, Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1783 65.4 93.5 93.5 CHECKED 1 124 4.6 6.5 100.0 . 818 30.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDPS8C Q1, fundraising, Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1891 69.4 99.2 99.2 CHECKED 1 16 .6 .8 100.0 . 818 30.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 CONVPS8C Q1, convince friends, Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1799 66.0 94.3 94.3 CHECKED 1 108 4.0 5.7 100.0 . 818 30.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVPS8C Q1, canvass, Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1886 69.2 98.9 98.9 CHECKED 1 21 .8 1.1 100.0 . 818 30.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONPS8C Q1, contribute, Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1848 67.8 96.9 96.9 CHECKED 1 59 2.2 3.1 100.0 . 818 30.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 ATTRG8C Q1, attended rally, Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1787 65.6 93.7 93.7 CHECKED 1 120 4.4 6.3 100.0 . 818 30.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDRG8C Q1, fundraising, Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1887 69.2 99.0 99.0 CHECKED 1 20 .7 1.0 100.0 . 818 30.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVRG8C Q1, convince friends, Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1832 67.2 96.1 96.1 CHECKED 1 75 2.8 3.9 100.0 . 818 30.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 CANVRG8C Q1, canvass, Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1885 69.2 98.8 98.8 CHECKED 1 22 .8 1.2 100.0 . 818 30.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONRG8C Q1, contribute, Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1867 68.5 97.9 97.9 CHECKED 1 40 1.5 2.1 100.0 . 818 30.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTAG8C Q1, attended rally, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1821 66.8 95.5 95.5 CHECKED 1 86 3.2 4.5 100.0 . 818 30.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 FUNDAG8C Q1, fundraising, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1889 69.3 99.1 99.1 CHECKED 1 18 .7 .9 100.0 . 818 30.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVAG8C Q1, convince friends, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1828 67.1 95.9 95.9 CHECKED 1 79 2.9 4.1 100.0 . 818 30.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVAG8C Q1, canvass, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1896 69.6 99.4 99.4 CHECKED 1 11 .4 .6 100.0 . 818 30.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 MONAG8C Q1, contribute, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1886 69.2 98.9 98.9 CHECKED 1 21 .8 1.1 100.0 . 818 30.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTGB8C Q1, attended rally, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1522 55.9 79.8 79.8 CHECKED 1 385 14.1 20.2 100.0 . 818 30.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDGB8C Q1, fundraising, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1762 64.7 92.4 92.4 CHECKED 1 145 5.3 7.6 100.0 . 818 30.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 CONVGB8C Q1, convince friends, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1488 54.6 78.0 78.0 CHECKED 1 419 15.4 22.0 100.0 . 818 30.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVGB8C Q1, canvass, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1755 64.4 92.0 92.0 CHECKED 1 152 5.6 8.0 100.0 . 818 30.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONGB8C Q1, contribute, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1627 59.7 85.3 85.3 CHECKED 1 280 10.3 14.7 100.0 . 818 30.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 ATTRD8C Q1, attended rally, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1761 64.6 92.3 92.3 CHECKED 1 146 5.4 7.7 100.0 . 818 30.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDRD8C Q1, fundraising, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1874 68.8 98.3 98.3 CHECKED 1 33 1.2 1.7 100.0 . 818 30.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVRD8C Q1, convince friends, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1795 65.9 94.1 94.1 CHECKED 1 112 4.1 5.9 100.0 . 818 30.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 CANVRD8C Q1, canvass, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1888 69.3 99.0 99.0 CHECKED 1 19 .7 1.0 100.0 . 818 30.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONRD8C Q1, contribute, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1837 67.4 96.3 96.3 CHECKED 1 70 2.6 3.7 100.0 . 818 30.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTJK8C Q1, attended rally, Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1854 68.0 97.2 97.2 CHECKED 1 53 1.9 2.8 100.0 . 818 30.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 FUNDJK8C Q1, fundraising, Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1898 69.7 99.5 99.5 CHECKED 1 9 .3 .5 100.0 . 818 30.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVJK8C Q1, convince friends, Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1879 69.0 98.5 98.5 CHECKED 1 28 1.0 1.5 100.0 . 818 30.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVJK8C Q1, canvass, Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1902 69.8 99.7 99.7 CHECKED 1 5 .2 .3 100.0 . 818 30.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 MONJK8C Q1, contribute, Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1888 69.3 99.0 99.0 CHECKED 1 19 .7 1.0 100.0 . 818 30.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTPR8C Q1, attended rally, Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1780 65.3 93.3 93.3 CHECKED 1 127 4.7 6.7 100.0 . 818 30.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDPR8C Q1, fundraising, Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1868 68.6 98.0 98.0 CHECKED 1 39 1.4 2.0 100.0 . 818 30.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 CONVPR8C Q1, convince friends, Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1808 66.3 94.8 94.8 CHECKED 1 99 3.6 5.2 100.0 . 818 30.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVPR8C Q1, canvass, Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1883 69.1 98.7 98.7 CHECKED 1 24 .9 1.3 100.0 . 818 30.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONPR8C Q1, contribute, Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1845 67.7 96.7 96.7 CHECKED 1 62 2.3 3.3 100.0 . 818 30.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 ATTBQ8C Q2, attended rally, Bush-Quayle Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1540 56.5 80.8 80.8 CHECKED 1 367 13.5 19.2 100.0 . 818 30.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDBQ8C Q2, fundraising, Bush-Quayle Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1749 64.2 91.7 91.7 CHECKED 1 158 5.8 8.3 100.0 . 818 30.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVBQ8C Q2, convince friends, Bush-Quayle Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1341 49.2 70.3 70.3 CHECKED 1 566 20.8 29.7 100.0 . 818 30.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 CANVBQ8C Q2, canvass, Bush-Quayle Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1678 61.6 88.0 88.0 CHECKED 1 229 8.4 12.0 100.0 . 818 30.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONBQ8C Q2, contribute, Bush-Quayle Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1570 57.6 82.3 82.3 CHECKED 1 337 12.4 17.7 100.0 . 818 30.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTDB8C Q2, attended rally, Dukakis-Bentsen Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1633 59.9 85.6 85.6 CHECKED 1 274 10.1 14.4 100.0 . 818 30.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 FUNDDB8C Q2, fundraising, Dukakis-Bentsen Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1791 65.7 93.9 93.9 CHECKED 1 116 4.3 6.1 100.0 . 818 30.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVDB8C Q2, convince friends, Dukakis-Bentsen Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1318 48.4 69.1 69.1 CHECKED 1 589 21.6 30.9 100.0 . 818 30.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVDB8C Q2, canvass, Dukakis-Bentsen Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1764 64.7 92.5 92.5 CHECKED 1 143 5.2 7.5 100.0 . 818 30.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 MONDB8C Q2, contribute, Dukakis-Bentsen Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1600 58.7 83.9 83.9 CHECKED 1 307 11.3 16.1 100.0 . 818 30.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTDH8C Q2, attended rally, Dem Hse Cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1734 63.6 90.9 90.9 CHECKED 1 173 6.3 9.1 100.0 . 818 30.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDDH8C Q2, fundraising, Dem Hse Cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1828 67.1 95.9 95.9 CHECKED 1 79 2.9 4.1 100.0 . 818 30.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 CONVDH8C Q2, convince friends, Dem Hse Cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1641 60.2 86.1 86.1 CHECKED 1 266 9.8 13.9 100.0 . 818 30.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVDH8C Q2, canvass, Dem Hse Cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1832 67.2 96.1 96.1 CHECKED 1 75 2.8 3.9 100.0 . 818 30.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONDH8C Q2, contribute, Dem Hse Cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1719 63.1 90.1 90.1 CHECKED 1 188 6.9 9.9 100.0 . 818 30.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 ATTRH8C Q2, attended rally, Rep Hse Cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1682 61.7 88.2 88.2 CHECKED 1 225 8.3 11.8 100.0 . 818 30.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDRH8C Q2, fundraising, Rep Hse Cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1798 66.0 94.3 94.3 CHECKED 1 109 4.0 5.7 100.0 . 818 30.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVRH8C Q2, convince friends, Rep Hse Cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1638 60.1 85.9 85.9 CHECKED 1 269 9.9 14.1 100.0 . 818 30.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 CANVRH8C Q2, canvass, Rep Hse Cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1801 66.1 94.4 94.4 CHECKED 1 106 3.9 5.6 100.0 . 818 30.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONRH8C Q2, contribute, Rep Hse Cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1704 62.5 89.4 89.4 CHECKED 1 203 7.4 10.6 100.0 . 818 30.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTDL8C Q, attended rally, Dem st-lcl Cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1694 62.2 88.8 88.8 CHECKED 1 213 7.8 11.2 100.0 . 818 30.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 FUNDDL8C Q2, fundraising, Dem st-lcl Cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1804 66.2 94.6 94.6 CHECKED 1 103 3.8 5.4 100.0 . 818 30.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVDL8C Q2, convince friends, Dem st-lcl Cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1604 58.9 84.1 84.1 CHECKED 1 303 11.1 15.9 100.0 . 818 30.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVDL8C Q2, canvass, Dem st-lcl Cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1805 66.2 94.7 94.7 CHECKED 1 102 3.7 5.3 100.0 . 818 30.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 MONDL8C Q2, contribute, Dem st-lcl Cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1658 60.8 86.9 86.9 CHECKED 1 249 9.1 13.1 100.0 . 818 30.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTRL8C Q2, attended rally, Rep st-lcl Cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1651 60.6 86.6 86.6 CHECKED 1 256 9.4 13.4 100.0 . 818 30.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDRL8C Q2, fundraising, Rep st-lcl Cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1772 65.0 92.9 92.9 CHECKED 1 135 5.0 7.1 100.0 . 818 30.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 CONVRL8C Q2, convince friends, Rep st-lcl Cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1615 59.3 84.7 84.7 CHECKED 1 292 10.7 15.3 100.0 . 818 30.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVRL8C Q2, canvass, Rep st-lcl Cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1771 65.0 92.9 92.9 CHECKED 1 136 5.0 7.1 100.0 . 818 30.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONRL8C Q2, contribute, Rep st-lcl Cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1630 59.8 85.5 85.5 CHECKED 1 277 10.2 14.5 100.0 . 818 30.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1907 Missing cases 818 VOTE888C Q3, Pres vote in 1988 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BUSH 1 823 30.2 43.9 43.9 DUKAKIS 2 1023 37.5 54.6 98.6 OTHER 3 27 1.0 1.4 100.0 . 852 31.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1873 Missing cases 852 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - VTHR888C Q4, Hse vote in 1988 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FOR THE DEMOCRAT 1 993 36.4 53.0 53.0 FOR THE REPUBLICAN 2 799 29.3 42.7 95.7 OTHER 3 18 .7 1.0 96.7 DID NOT VOTE 4 62 2.3 3.3 100.0 . 853 31.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1872 Missing cases 853 PTYID8C Q5, Describe party affiliation Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONG DEMOCRAT 1 592 21.7 31.7 31.7 WEAK DEMOCRAT 2 248 9.1 13.3 44.9 INDEPENDENT DEM 3 177 6.5 9.5 54.4 INDEPENDENT 4 37 1.4 2.0 56.4 INDEPENDENT REP 5 71 2.6 3.8 60.2 WEAK REPUBLICAN 6 154 5.7 8.2 68.4 STRONG REPUBLICAN 7 590 21.7 31.6 100.0 . 853 31.3 Missing OTHER 8 3 .1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1869 Missing cases 856 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ALWAYS8C Q6, Characterize party involvement Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent WORKS YEAR AFTER YEA 1 958 35.2 54.3 54.3 WORKS WHEN WORTHWHIL 2 807 29.6 45.7 100.0 . 960 35.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1765 Missing cases 960 LIBCON8C Q7, Describe political philosophy Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 55 2.0 3.0 3.0 LIBERAL 2 387 14.2 21.2 24.2 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 265 9.7 14.5 38.7 M-O-R 4 285 10.5 15.6 54.2 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 303 11.1 16.6 70.8 CONSERVATIVE 6 472 17.3 25.8 96.6 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 62 2.3 3.4 100.0 . 856 31.4 Missing NOT SURE 8 40 1.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1829 Missing cases 896 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SWITCH8C Q8, Member another party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 409 15.0 22.0 22.0 NO 2 1450 53.2 78.0 100.0 . 866 31.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1859 Missing cases 866 WHEN8C Q8a, year another party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 1 .0 .3 .3 2 1 .0 .3 .5 4 1 .0 .3 .8 5 1 .0 .3 1.1 6 2 .1 .5 1.6 7 5 .2 1.3 3.0 8 9 .3 2.4 5.4 9 1 .0 .3 5.7 50 28 1.0 7.5 13.2 51 4 .1 1.1 14.3 52 12 .4 3.2 17.5 53 5 .2 1.3 18.9 54 10 .4 2.7 21.6 55 2 .1 .5 22.1 56 13 .5 3.5 25.6 57 2 .1 .5 26.1 58 1 .0 .3 26.4 59 3 .1 .8 27.2 60 38 1.4 10.2 37.5 61 4 .1 1.1 38.5 62 11 .4 3.0 41.5 63 6 .2 1.6 43.1 64 23 .8 6.2 49.3 65 6 .2 1.6 50.9 66 5 .2 1.3 52.3 67 3 .1 .8 53.1 68 28 1.0 7.5 60.6 69 4 .1 1.1 61.7 70 10 .4 2.7 64.4 71 1 .0 .3 64.7 72 13 .5 3.5 68.2 73 1 .0 .3 68.5 74 8 .3 2.2 70.6 75 3 .1 .8 71.4 76 24 .9 6.5 77.9 77 2 .1 .5 78.4 78 2 .1 .5 79.0 79 7 .3 1.9 80.9 80 27 1.0 7.3 88.1 81 2 .1 .5 88.7 82 3 .1 .8 89.5 84 11 .4 3.0 92.5 85 1 .0 .3 92.7 86 2 .1 .5 93.3 87 2 .1 .5 93.8 88 21 .8 5.7 99.5 WHEN8C Q8a, year another party 89 2 .1 .5 100.0 . 2354 86.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 371 Missing cases 2354 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INT88G8C Q9, interest 1988 Pres election Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY MUCH INTERESTED 1 1350 49.5 72.6 72.6 SOMEWHAT INTERESTED 2 380 13.9 20.4 93.1 NOT MUCH INTERESTED 3 129 4.7 6.9 100.0 . 866 31.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1859 Missing cases 866 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CAM888C Q10, general elect. involvmt,1988 Pres Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 1013 37.2 54.8 54.8 NO 2 835 30.6 45.2 100.0 . 877 32.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1848 Missing cases 877 HELPPP8C Q10a, help party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY IMPORTANT 1 664 24.4 64.1 64.1 SOMEWHAT IMPORTANT 2 307 11.3 29.6 93.7 NOT VERY IMPORTANT 3 42 1.5 4.1 97.8 NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 4 23 .8 2.2 100.0 . 1689 62.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1036 Missing cases 1689 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FRIEND8C Q10b, asked by friend Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY IMPORTANT 1 74 2.7 9.7 9.7 SOMEWHAT IMPORTANT 2 162 5.9 21.2 30.9 NOT VERY IMPORTANT 3 142 5.2 18.6 49.5 NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 4 385 14.1 50.5 100.0 . 1962 72.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 763 Missing cases 1962 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MEMBER8C Q10c, asked by org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY IMPORTANT 1 175 6.4 21.7 21.7 SOMEWHAT IMPORTANT 2 231 8.5 28.6 50.2 NOT VERY IMPORTANT 3 127 4.7 15.7 66.0 NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 4 275 10.1 34.0 100.0 . 1917 70.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 808 Missing cases 1917 CAND8C Q10d, strong support, Pres Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY IMPORTANT 1 656 24.1 67.7 67.7 SOMEWHAT IMPORTANT 2 223 8.2 23.0 90.7 NOT VERY IMPORTANT 3 51 1.9 5.3 96.0 NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 4 39 1.4 4.0 100.0 . 1756 64.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 969 Missing cases 1756 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OPPR8C Q10e, strong opposition, Pres Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY IMPORTANT 1 596 21.9 64.0 64.0 SOMEWHAT IMPORTANT 2 187 6.9 20.1 84.1 NOT VERY IMPORTANT 3 66 2.4 7.1 91.2 NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 4 82 3.0 8.8 100.0 . 1794 65.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 931 Missing cases 1794 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - VP8C Q10f, strong support, Vice-Pres Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY IMPORTANT 1 271 9.9 30.6 30.6 SOMEWHAT IMPORTANT 2 211 7.7 23.8 54.4 NOT VERY IMPORTANT 3 184 6.8 20.8 75.2 NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 4 220 8.1 24.8 100.0 . 1839 67.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 886 Missing cases 1839 OPVP8C Q10g, strong opposition, Vice-Pres Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY IMPORTANT 1 373 13.7 43.2 43.2 SOMEWHAT IMPORTANT 2 119 4.4 13.8 56.9 NOT VERY IMPORTANT 3 151 5.5 17.5 74.4 NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 4 221 8.1 25.6 100.0 . 1861 68.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 864 Missing cases 1861 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ISS8C Q10h, issues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY IMPORTANT 1 757 27.8 76.3 76.3 SOMEWHAT IMPORTANT 2 188 6.9 19.0 95.3 NOT VERY IMPORTANT 3 26 1.0 2.6 97.9 NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 4 21 .8 2.1 100.0 . 1733 63.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 992 Missing cases 1733 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EXCITE8C Q10i, campaign excitement Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY IMPORTANT 1 130 4.8 14.6 14.6 SOMEWHAT IMPORTANT 2 227 8.3 25.4 40.0 NOT VERY IMPORTANT 3 245 9.0 27.5 67.5 NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 4 290 10.6 32.5 100.0 . 1833 67.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 892 Missing cases 1833 MIREAS8C Q10a, most important reason Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent HELP PARTY 1 333 12.2 30.8 30.8 FRIEND ASKED 2 11 .4 1.0 31.8 ORG ASKED 3 12 .4 1.1 32.9 STRONG SUPPORT, PRES 4 256 9.4 23.7 56.6 STRONG OPPOSITION, P 5 120 4.4 11.1 67.7 STRONG SUPPORT, VP C 6 5 .2 .5 68.2 STRONG OPPOSITION, V 7 24 .9 2.2 70.4 ISSUES 8 304 11.2 28.1 98.5 CAMPAIGN EXCITEMENT 9 16 .6 1.5 100.0 . 1644 60.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1081 Missing cases 1644 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ACHIMP8C Q11a, record of achievment Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY IMPORTANT 1 1084 39.8 60.9 60.9 SOMEWHAT IMPORTANT 2 555 20.4 31.2 92.1 NOT VERY IMPORTANT 3 110 4.0 6.2 98.3 NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 4 30 1.1 1.7 100.0 . 946 34.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1779 Missing cases 946 TVIMP8C Q11b, performance on TV Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY IMPORTANT 1 559 20.5 32.6 32.6 SOMEWHAT IMPORTANT 2 632 23.2 36.9 69.5 NOT VERY IMPORTANT 3 340 12.5 19.8 89.4 NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 4 182 6.7 10.6 100.0 . 1012 37.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1713 Missing cases 1012 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CHIMP8C Q11c, moral character Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY IMPORTANT 1 1187 43.6 67.3 67.3 SOMEWHAT IMPORTANT 2 487 17.9 27.6 94.8 NOT VERY IMPORTANT 3 68 2.5 3.9 98.7 NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 4 23 .8 1.3 100.0 . 960 35.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1765 Missing cases 960 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FPIMP8C Q11d, foreign policy knowledge Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY IMPORTANT 1 883 32.4 51.2 51.2 SOMEWHAT IMPORTANT 2 675 24.8 39.1 90.3 NOT VERY IMPORTANT 3 145 5.3 8.4 98.7 NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 4 23 .8 1.3 100.0 . 999 36.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1726 Missing cases 999 PHILAV8C Q11e, represent average voter phil Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY IMPORTANT 1 848 31.1 48.0 48.0 SOMEWHAT IMPORTANT 2 695 25.5 39.3 87.3 NOT VERY IMPORTANT 3 186 6.8 10.5 97.8 NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 4 39 1.4 2.2 100.0 . 957 35.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1768 Missing cases 957 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PHILPP8C Q11f, represent pol party phil Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY IMPORTANT 1 561 20.6 32.3 32.3 SOMEWHAT IMPORTANT 2 847 31.1 48.7 81.0 NOT VERY IMPORTANT 3 269 9.9 15.5 96.4 NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 4 62 2.3 3.6 100.0 . 986 36.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1739 Missing cases 986 MIMP8C Q11a, most important to cand success Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent RECORD 1 453 16.6 25.7 25.7 TV PERFORMANCE 2 338 12.4 19.2 44.9 MORAL CHARACTER 3 240 8.8 13.6 58.6 FOREIGN POLICY 4 37 1.4 2.1 60.7 AVERAGE VOTER POL PH 5 576 21.1 32.7 93.4 POL PARTY POL PHIL 6 116 4.3 6.6 100.0 . 965 35.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1760 Missing cases 965 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABORT8C Q12a,opinion, abortion Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 385 14.1 22.3 22.3 FAVOR 2 197 7.2 11.4 33.7 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 93 3.4 5.4 39.1 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 77 2.8 4.5 43.6 OPPOSE 6 313 11.5 18.1 61.7 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 660 24.2 38.3 100.0 . 865 31.7 Missing NOT SURE 4 135 5.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1725 Missing cases 1000 DEFSP8C Q12b,opinion, defense spending Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 210 7.7 12.2 12.2 FAVOR 2 281 10.3 16.3 28.5 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 213 7.8 12.4 40.9 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 227 8.3 13.2 54.0 OPPOSE 6 367 13.5 21.3 75.3 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 425 15.6 24.7 100.0 . 875 32.1 Missing NOT SURE 4 127 4.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1723 Missing cases 1002 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AFFACT8C Q12c,opinion, affirm. action Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 197 7.2 12.3 12.3 FAVOR 2 338 12.4 21.1 33.4 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 396 14.5 24.7 58.0 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 246 9.0 15.3 73.4 OPPOSE 6 249 9.1 15.5 88.9 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 178 6.5 11.1 100.0 . 883 32.4 Missing NOT SURE 4 238 8.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1604 Missing cases 1121 BALBUD8C Q12d,opinion,balanced budget Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 525 19.3 31.8 31.8 FAVOR 2 456 16.7 27.6 59.3 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 219 8.0 13.2 72.6 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 86 3.2 5.2 77.8 OPPOSE 6 194 7.1 11.7 89.5 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 173 6.3 10.5 100.0 . 873 32.0 Missing NOT SURE 4 199 7.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1653 Missing cases 1072 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - POLLUT8C Q12e,opinion,regs on pollution Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 619 22.7 36.0 36.0 FAVOR 2 566 20.8 32.9 68.9 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 332 12.2 19.3 88.2 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 95 3.5 5.5 93.7 OPPOSE 6 78 2.9 4.5 98.3 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 30 1.1 1.7 100.0 . 883 32.4 Missing NOT SURE 4 122 4.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1720 Missing cases 1005 CONTRA8C Q12f,opinion,Contra sppt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 172 6.3 11.3 11.3 FAVOR 2 260 9.5 17.0 28.3 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 199 7.3 13.0 41.3 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 85 3.1 5.6 46.9 OPPOSE 6 259 9.5 17.0 63.9 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 551 20.2 36.1 100.0 . 890 32.7 Missing NOT SURE 4 309 11.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1526 Missing cases 1199 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FARMER8C Q12g,opinion, Farm aid Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 155 5.7 10.3 10.3 FAVOR 2 298 10.9 19.7 30.0 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 336 12.3 22.3 52.3 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 285 10.5 18.9 71.2 OPPOSE 6 291 10.7 19.3 90.5 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 144 5.3 9.5 100.0 . 885 32.5 Missing NOT SURE 4 331 12.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1509 Missing cases 1216 TARIFF8C Q12h,opinion,tariffs on for. comp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 249 9.1 15.7 15.7 FAVOR 2 329 12.1 20.7 36.4 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 303 11.1 19.1 55.4 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 213 7.8 13.4 68.8 OPPOSE 6 309 11.3 19.4 88.2 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 187 6.9 11.8 100.0 . 874 32.1 Missing NOT SURE 4 261 9.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1590 Missing cases 1135 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SDI8C Q12i,opinion, Strategic Def. Init. Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 144 5.3 9.2 9.2 FAVOR 2 197 7.2 12.6 21.7 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 230 8.4 14.7 36.4 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 171 6.3 10.9 47.3 OPPOSE 6 284 10.4 18.1 65.4 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 543 19.9 34.6 100.0 . 886 32.5 Missing NOT SURE 4 270 9.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1569 Missing cases 1156 PRAYER8C Q12j,opinion, prayer in school Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 353 13.0 20.8 20.8 FAVOR 2 320 11.7 18.8 39.6 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 217 8.0 12.8 52.3 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 94 3.4 5.5 57.8 OPPOSE 6 206 7.6 12.1 70.0 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 511 18.8 30.0 100.0 . 869 31.9 Missing NOT SURE 4 155 5.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1701 Missing cases 1024 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ERA8C Q12k,opinion, ERA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 487 17.9 29.9 29.9 FAVOR 2 420 15.4 25.8 55.6 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 204 7.5 12.5 68.1 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 96 3.5 5.9 74.0 OPPOSE 6 178 6.5 10.9 84.9 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 246 9.0 15.1 100.0 . 889 32.6 Missing NOT SURE 4 205 7.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1631 Missing cases 1094 NHI8C Q12l,opinion, NHI Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 441 16.2 27.5 27.5 FAVOR 2 382 14.0 23.8 51.3 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 232 8.5 14.5 65.7 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 99 3.6 6.2 71.9 OPPOSE 6 208 7.6 13.0 84.9 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 243 8.9 15.1 100.0 . 861 31.6 Missing NOT SURE 4 259 9.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1605 Missing cases 1120 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NUC8C Q12m,opinion, nuclear power Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 139 5.1 9.5 9.5 FAVOR 2 245 9.0 16.7 26.2 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 322 11.8 22.0 48.3 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 5 194 7.1 13.3 61.5 OPPOSE 6 253 9.3 17.3 78.8 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 310 11.4 21.2 100.0 . 876 32.1 Missing NOT SURE 4 386 14.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1463 Missing cases 1262 MIISS8C Q13, most impt. issue. this year Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ABORTION 1 231 8.5 12.9 12.9 DEFENSE SPENDING 2 207 7.6 11.6 24.5 AFFIRMATIVE ACTION 3 60 2.2 3.4 27.8 BALANCED BUDGET 4 474 17.4 26.5 54.3 ENVIRON POLLUTION 5 246 9.0 13.8 68.1 CONTRA SUPPORT 6 48 1.8 2.7 70.8 FARMER AID 7 45 1.7 2.5 73.3 TARIFFS 8 96 3.5 5.4 78.6 SDI, STAR WARS 9 82 3.0 4.6 83.2 PRAYER IN SCHOOLS 10 57 2.1 3.2 86.4 ERA AMENDMENT 11 46 1.7 2.6 89.0 NHI 12 160 5.9 8.9 97.9 NUCLEAR POWER 13 37 1.4 2.1 100.0 . 936 34.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1789 Missing cases 936 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCLB8C Q14,pol philosophy of Bentsen Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 77 2.8 4.6 4.6 LIBERAL 2 304 11.2 18.2 22.8 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 346 12.7 20.7 43.6 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 360 13.2 21.6 65.1 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 337 12.4 20.2 85.3 CONSERVATIVE 6 236 8.7 14.1 99.5 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 9 .3 .5 100.0 . 943 34.6 Missing NOT SURE 8 113 4.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1669 Missing cases 1056 LCGB8C Q14,pol philosophy of Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 11 .4 .6 .6 LIBERAL 2 19 .7 1.1 1.7 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 37 1.4 2.2 3.9 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 169 6.2 9.8 13.7 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 395 14.5 23.0 36.8 CONSERVATIVE 6 910 33.4 53.0 89.7 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 176 6.5 10.3 100.0 . 935 34.3 Missing NOT SURE 8 73 2.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1717 Missing cases 1008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCRD8C Q14,pol philosophy of Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 6 .2 .4 .4 LIBERAL 2 33 1.2 2.0 2.4 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 62 2.3 3.8 6.1 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 225 8.3 13.7 19.8 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 371 13.6 22.5 42.3 CONSERVATIVE 6 788 28.9 47.8 90.1 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 163 6.0 9.9 100.0 . 965 35.4 Missing NOT SURE 8 112 4.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1648 Missing cases 1077 LCMD8C Q14,pol philosophy of Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 467 17.1 26.8 26.8 LIBERAL 2 742 27.2 42.6 69.4 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 344 12.6 19.7 89.2 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 136 5.0 7.8 97.0 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 30 1.1 1.7 98.7 CONSERVATIVE 6 22 .8 1.3 99.9 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 1 .0 .1 100.0 . 941 34.5 Missing NOT SURE 8 42 1.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1742 Missing cases 983 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCRG8C Q14,pol philosophy of Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 106 3.9 7.7 7.7 LIBERAL 2 419 15.4 30.5 38.2 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 426 15.6 31.0 69.3 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 284 10.4 20.7 89.9 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 97 3.6 7.1 97.0 CONSERVATIVE 6 37 1.4 2.7 99.7 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 4 .1 .3 100.0 . 1022 37.5 Missing NOT SURE 8 330 12.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1373 Missing cases 1352 LCAG8C Q14,pol philosophy of Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 66 2.4 4.9 4.9 LIBERAL 2 269 9.9 19.9 24.7 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 411 15.1 30.3 55.1 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 318 11.7 23.5 78.5 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 170 6.2 12.5 91.1 CONSERVATIVE 6 102 3.7 7.5 98.6 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 19 .7 1.4 100.0 . 1028 37.7 Missing NOT SURE 8 342 12.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1355 Missing cases 1370 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCJJ8C Q14,pol philosophy of Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 1119 41.1 66.6 66.6 LIBERAL 2 402 14.8 23.9 90.5 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 81 3.0 4.8 95.3 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 48 1.8 2.9 98.2 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 16 .6 1.0 99.1 CONSERVATIVE 6 7 .3 .4 99.5 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 8 .3 .5 100.0 . 969 35.6 Missing NOT SURE 8 75 2.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1681 Missing cases 1044 LCJK8C Q14,pol philosophy of Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 6 .2 .4 .4 LIBERAL 2 22 .8 1.5 1.9 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 43 1.6 2.9 4.8 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 92 3.4 6.3 11.1 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 112 4.1 7.6 18.7 CONSERVATIVE 6 554 20.3 37.8 56.5 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 638 23.4 43.5 100.0 . 1006 36.9 Missing NOT SURE 8 252 9.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1467 Missing cases 1258 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCDQ8C Q14,pol philosophy of Quayle Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 7 .3 .5 .5 LIBERAL 2 18 .7 1.3 1.8 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 21 .8 1.5 3.3 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 85 3.1 6.0 9.3 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 162 5.9 11.5 20.7 CONSERVATIVE 6 607 22.3 43.0 63.7 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 513 18.8 36.3 100.0 . 988 36.3 Missing NOT SURE 8 324 11.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1413 Missing cases 1312 LCRR8C Q14,pol philosophy of Reagan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 25 .9 1.5 1.5 LIBERAL 2 19 .7 1.1 2.6 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 16 .6 1.0 3.6 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 47 1.7 2.8 6.4 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 110 4.0 6.6 12.9 CONSERVATIVE 6 683 25.1 40.7 53.7 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 777 28.5 46.3 100.0 . 959 35.2 Missing NOT SURE 8 89 3.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1677 Missing cases 1048 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCPR8C Q14,pol philosophy of Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 17 .6 1.2 1.2 LIBERAL 2 36 1.3 2.5 3.6 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 27 1.0 1.8 5.5 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 54 2.0 3.7 9.2 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 64 2.3 4.4 13.5 CONSERVATIVE 6 256 9.4 17.5 31.0 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 1010 37.1 69.0 100.0 . 995 36.5 Missing NOT SURE 8 266 9.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1464 Missing cases 1261 LCPS8C Q14,pol philosophy of Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 256 9.4 18.3 18.3 LIBERAL 2 605 22.2 43.2 61.5 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 241 8.8 17.2 78.7 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 159 5.8 11.4 90.1 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 72 2.6 5.1 95.2 CONSERVATIVE 6 51 1.9 3.6 98.9 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 16 .6 1.1 100.0 . 1037 38.1 Missing NOT SURE 8 288 10.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1400 Missing cases 1325 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCAV8C Q14,pol philosophy of Am Voter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 7 .3 .4 .4 LIBERAL 2 46 1.7 2.7 3.1 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 167 6.1 9.9 13.0 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 592 21.7 35.0 48.0 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 641 23.5 37.9 85.9 CONSERVATIVE 6 227 8.3 13.4 99.3 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 11 .4 .7 100.0 . 951 34.9 Missing NOT SURE 8 83 3.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1691 Missing cases 1034 LCST8C Q14,pol philosophy of Am Voter,state Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 17 .6 1.0 1.0 LIBERAL 2 84 3.1 4.9 5.9 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 325 11.9 18.9 24.8 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 373 13.7 21.7 46.5 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 478 17.5 27.8 74.3 CONSERVATIVE 6 392 14.4 22.8 97.1 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 50 1.8 2.9 100.0 . 955 35.0 Missing NOT SURE 8 51 1.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1719 Missing cases 1006 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCRP8C Q14,pol philosophy of Rep Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 9 .3 .5 .5 LIBERAL 2 21 .8 1.3 1.8 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 27 1.0 1.6 3.4 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 67 2.5 4.0 7.4 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 361 13.2 21.5 28.9 CONSERVATIVE 6 913 33.5 54.4 83.3 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 281 10.3 16.7 100.0 . 971 35.6 Missing NOT SURE 8 75 2.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1679 Missing cases 1046 LCDP8C Q14,pol philosophy of Dem Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 224 8.2 12.8 12.8 LIBERAL 2 786 28.8 45.1 57.9 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 480 17.6 27.5 85.4 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 176 6.5 10.1 95.5 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 48 1.8 2.8 98.3 CONSERVATIVE 6 28 1.0 1.6 99.9 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 2 .1 .1 100.0 . 941 34.5 Missing NOT SURE 8 40 1.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1744 Missing cases 981 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALLB8C Q15,Overall Eval Bentsen Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 230 8.4 13.7 13.7 ABOVE AVERAGE 2 725 26.6 43.1 56.7 AVERAGE 3 525 19.3 31.2 87.9 BELOW AVERAGE 4 109 4.0 6.5 94.4 POOR 5 94 3.4 5.6 100.0 . 928 34.1 Missing NOT SURE 6 114 4.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1683 Missing cases 1042 EVALGB8C Q15,Overall Eval Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 349 12.8 19.8 19.8 ABOVE AVERAGE 2 650 23.9 36.8 56.6 AVERAGE 3 464 17.0 26.3 82.9 BELOW AVERAGE 4 166 6.1 9.4 92.3 POOR 5 135 5.0 7.7 100.0 . 921 33.8 Missing NOT SURE 6 40 1.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1764 Missing cases 961 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALMD8C Q15,Overall Eval Dukakis Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 203 7.4 11.9 11.9 ABOVE AVERAGE 2 730 26.8 42.7 54.5 AVERAGE 3 553 20.3 32.3 86.8 BELOW AVERAGE 4 136 5.0 7.9 94.8 POOR 5 89 3.3 5.2 100.0 . 930 34.1 Missing NOT SURE 6 84 3.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1711 Missing cases 1014 EVALRD8C Q15,Overall Eval Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 159 5.8 8.9 8.9 ABOVE AVERAGE 2 582 21.4 32.7 41.6 AVERAGE 3 516 18.9 29.0 70.5 BELOW AVERAGE 4 233 8.6 13.1 83.6 POOR 5 292 10.7 16.4 100.0 . 914 33.5 Missing NOT SURE 6 29 1.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1782 Missing cases 943 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALRG8C Q15,Overall Eval Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 50 1.8 3.4 3.4 ABOVE AVERAGE 2 289 10.6 19.8 23.2 AVERAGE 3 752 27.6 51.4 74.6 BELOW AVERAGE 4 272 10.0 18.6 93.2 POOR 5 99 3.6 6.8 100.0 . 982 36.0 Missing NOT SURE 6 281 10.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1462 Missing cases 1263 EVALAG8C Q15,Overall Eval Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 47 1.7 3.3 3.3 ABOVE AVERAGE 2 308 11.3 21.3 24.6 AVERAGE 3 683 25.1 47.3 71.8 BELOW AVERAGE 4 306 11.2 21.2 93.0 POOR 5 101 3.7 7.0 100.0 . 984 36.1 Missing NOT SURE 6 296 10.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1445 Missing cases 1280 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALJJ8C Q15,Overall Eval Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 183 6.7 10.6 10.6 ABOVE AVERAGE 2 475 17.4 27.6 38.2 AVERAGE 3 400 14.7 23.2 61.4 BELOW AVERAGE 4 237 8.7 13.7 75.1 POOR 5 429 15.7 24.9 100.0 . 933 34.2 Missing NOT SURE 6 68 2.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1724 Missing cases 1001 EVALJK8C Q15,Overall Eval Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 107 3.9 6.9 6.9 ABOVE AVERAGE 2 429 15.7 27.8 34.7 AVERAGE 3 553 20.3 35.8 70.5 BELOW AVERAGE 4 257 9.4 16.6 87.1 POOR 5 199 7.3 12.9 100.0 . 969 35.6 Missing NOT SURE 6 211 7.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1545 Missing cases 1180 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALDQ8C Q15,Overall Eval Quayle Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 46 1.7 2.8 2.8 ABOVE AVERAGE 2 263 9.7 16.0 18.8 AVERAGE 3 427 15.7 26.0 44.8 BELOW AVERAGE 4 282 10.3 17.2 62.0 POOR 5 625 22.9 38.0 100.0 . 943 34.6 Missing NOT SURE 6 139 5.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1643 Missing cases 1082 EVALRR8C Q15,Overall Eval Reagan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 364 13.4 20.8 20.8 ABOVE AVERAGE 2 390 14.3 22.3 43.0 AVERAGE 3 276 10.1 15.8 58.8 BELOW AVERAGE 4 237 8.7 13.5 72.3 POOR 5 485 17.8 27.7 100.0 . 933 34.2 Missing NOT SURE 6 40 1.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1752 Missing cases 973 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALPR8C Q15,Overall Eval Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 34 1.2 2.1 2.1 ABOVE AVERAGE 2 162 5.9 10.2 12.3 AVERAGE 3 338 12.4 21.2 33.5 BELOW AVERAGE 4 295 10.8 18.5 52.0 POOR 5 765 28.1 48.0 100.0 . 970 35.6 Missing NOT SURE 6 161 5.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1594 Missing cases 1131 EVALPS8C Q15,Overall Eval Simon Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 84 3.1 5.6 5.6 ABOVE AVERAGE 2 407 14.9 27.4 33.0 AVERAGE 3 573 21.0 38.5 71.5 BELOW AVERAGE 4 246 9.0 16.5 88.0 POOR 5 178 6.5 12.0 100.0 . 988 36.3 Missing NOT SURE 6 249 9.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1488 Missing cases 1237 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALRP8C Q15,Overall Eval Rep Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 121 4.4 7.0 7.0 ABOVE AVERAGE 2 446 16.4 25.8 32.8 AVERAGE 3 583 21.4 33.7 66.6 BELOW AVERAGE 4 285 10.5 16.5 83.0 POOR 5 293 10.8 17.0 100.0 . 938 34.4 Missing NOT SURE 6 59 2.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1728 Missing cases 997 EVALDP8C Q15,Overall Eval Dem Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 116 4.3 6.6 6.6 ABOVE AVERAGE 2 377 13.8 21.5 28.1 AVERAGE 3 646 23.7 36.9 65.0 BELOW AVERAGE 4 370 13.6 21.1 86.1 POOR 5 244 9.0 13.9 100.0 . 931 34.2 Missing NOT SURE 6 41 1.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1753 Missing cases 972 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TEACH8C Q16a,opinion,Teacher's Org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1 293 10.8 15.9 15.9 SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 2 508 18.6 27.6 43.5 NEUTRAL 3 357 13.1 19.4 62.9 SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 4 389 14.3 21.1 84.0 VERY UNFAVORABLE 5 295 10.8 16.0 100.0 . 883 32.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1842 Missing cases 883 BUSORG8C Q16b,opinion,Bus Org. Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1 244 9.0 13.3 13.3 SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 2 707 25.9 38.7 52.0 NEUTRAL 3 530 19.4 29.0 81.0 SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 4 266 9.8 14.6 95.6 VERY UNFAVORABLE 5 81 3.0 4.4 100.0 . 897 32.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1828 Missing cases 897 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WOMEN8C Q16c,opinion,Women's Rights Grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1 216 7.9 11.8 11.8 SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 2 458 16.8 24.9 36.7 NEUTRAL 3 410 15.0 22.3 59.0 SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 4 370 13.6 20.1 79.2 VERY UNFAVORABLE 5 383 14.1 20.8 100.0 . 888 32.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1837 Missing cases 888 CIVILR8C Q16d,opinion,Civil Rights Grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1 263 9.7 14.3 14.3 SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 2 476 17.5 25.9 40.3 NEUTRAL 3 439 16.1 23.9 64.2 SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 4 379 13.9 20.7 84.9 VERY UNFAVORABLE 5 278 10.2 15.1 100.0 . 890 32.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1835 Missing cases 890 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ENVIR8C Q16e,opinion, Envi. Group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1 499 18.3 27.4 27.4 SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 2 560 20.6 30.8 58.3 NEUTRAL 3 444 16.3 24.4 82.7 SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 4 223 8.2 12.3 94.9 VERY UNFAVORABLE 5 92 3.4 5.1 100.0 . 907 33.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1818 Missing cases 907 NONPRT8C Q16f,opinion,Interest Grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1 452 16.6 24.7 24.7 SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 2 554 20.3 30.2 54.9 NEUTRAL 3 525 19.3 28.7 83.6 SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 4 207 7.6 11.3 94.9 VERY UNFAVORABLE 5 94 3.4 5.1 100.0 . 893 32.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1832 Missing cases 893 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LABOR8C Q16g,opinion, Labor Union Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1 228 8.4 12.5 12.5 SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 2 442 16.2 24.2 36.7 NEUTRAL 3 367 13.5 20.1 56.7 SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 4 515 18.9 28.2 84.9 VERY UNFAVORABLE 5 276 10.1 15.1 100.0 . 897 32.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1828 Missing cases 897 FARM8C Q16h,opinion, Farm Org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1 209 7.7 11.8 11.8 SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 2 607 22.3 34.3 46.1 NEUTRAL 3 672 24.7 38.0 84.1 SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 4 230 8.4 13.0 97.1 VERY UNFAVORABLE 5 51 1.9 2.9 100.0 . 956 35.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1769 Missing cases 956 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVANG8C Q16i,opinion,Pol. Evangelical Grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1 60 2.2 3.3 3.3 SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 2 185 6.8 10.1 13.4 NEUTRAL 3 277 10.2 15.1 28.5 SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 4 426 15.6 23.3 51.7 VERY UNFAVORABLE 5 884 32.4 48.3 100.0 . 893 32.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1832 Missing cases 893 ANTIAB8C Q16j,opinion, Anti-Abortion Grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1 194 7.1 10.5 10.5 SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 2 237 8.7 12.9 23.4 NEUTRAL 3 233 8.6 12.7 36.1 SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 4 362 13.3 19.7 55.8 VERY UNFAVORABLE 5 813 29.8 44.2 100.0 . 886 32.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1839 Missing cases 886 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LIBID8C Q16k,opinion, Liberal Phil. Grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1 53 1.9 2.9 2.9 SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 2 269 9.9 15.0 17.9 NEUTRAL 3 460 16.9 25.6 43.5 SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 4 399 14.6 22.2 65.6 VERY UNFAVORABLE 5 618 22.7 34.4 100.0 . 926 34.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1799 Missing cases 926 CONID8C Q16l,opinion, Conserv. Phil Grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1 87 3.2 4.8 4.8 SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 2 329 12.1 18.2 23.0 NEUTRAL 3 502 18.4 27.7 50.7 SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 4 449 16.5 24.8 75.5 VERY UNFAVORABLE 5 443 16.3 24.5 100.0 . 915 33.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1810 Missing cases 915 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DP8C Q16m,opinion, Dem Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1 428 15.7 23.5 23.5 SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 2 495 18.2 27.2 50.6 NEUTRAL 3 254 9.3 13.9 64.6 SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 4 373 13.7 20.5 85.0 VERY UNFAVORABLE 5 273 10.0 15.0 100.0 . 902 33.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1823 Missing cases 902 RP8C Q16n,opinion, Rep Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1 373 13.7 20.6 20.6 SOMEWHAT FAVORABLE 2 460 16.9 25.4 45.9 NEUTRAL 3 309 11.3 17.0 63.0 SOMEWHAT UNFAVORABLE 4 395 14.5 21.8 84.8 VERY UNFAVORABLE 5 276 10.1 15.2 100.0 . 912 33.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1813 Missing cases 912 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HOWACT8C Q17,next four years Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACTIVE ALWAYS 1 629 23.1 44.5 44.5 ACTIVE ELECTIONS 2 216 7.9 15.3 59.8 ACTIVE ELECTIONS W/I 3 412 15.1 29.2 89.0 NOT ACTIVE 4 156 5.7 11.0 100.0 . 871 32.0 Missing NOT SURE 5 441 16.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1413 Missing cases 1312 EVLEXP8C Q18,evaluate nomination exper. Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY POSITIVE 1 374 13.7 21.7 21.7 MORE POSITIVE THAN N 2 734 26.9 42.6 64.3 NEUTRAL 3 342 12.6 19.8 84.2 MORE NEGATIVE THAN P 4 225 8.3 13.1 97.2 VERY NEGATIVE 5 48 1.8 2.8 100.0 . 1002 36.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1723 Missing cases 1002 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AGE8C Q19, age Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 17-24 1 18 .7 1.0 1.0 25-29 2 46 1.7 2.4 3.4 30-39 3 197 7.2 10.5 13.8 40-49 4 315 11.6 16.7 30.6 50-59 5 432 15.9 22.9 53.5 60-64 6 278 10.2 14.7 68.2 65 AND OLDER 7 599 22.0 31.8 100.0 . 840 30.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1885 Missing cases 840 SEX8C Q20, sex Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MALE 1 1024 37.6 54.4 54.4 FEMALE 2 860 31.6 45.6 100.0 . 841 30.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1884 Missing cases 841 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MARR8C Q21, married Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MARRIED 1 1473 54.1 78.4 78.4 DIVORCED 2 94 3.4 5.0 83.4 WIDOWED 3 148 5.4 7.9 91.3 NEVER MARRIED 4 163 6.0 8.7 100.0 . 847 31.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1878 Missing cases 847 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BNAG8C Q22, born again Christian Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 490 18.0 26.8 26.8 NO 2 1336 49.0 73.2 100.0 . 899 33.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1826 Missing cases 899 JOBYOU8C Q23, job, you Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PROFESSIONAL 1 726 26.6 41.6 41.6 OWNER/PARTNER 2 275 10.1 15.8 57.4 UPPER-LEVEL MGMT 3 86 3.2 4.9 62.3 MIDDLE-LEVEL MGMT 4 169 6.2 9.7 72.0 SKILLED LABOR 5 234 8.6 13.4 85.4 UNSKILLED LABOR 6 62 2.3 3.6 88.9 OTHER 7 193 7.1 11.1 100.0 . 980 36.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1745 Missing cases 980 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - JOBSP8C Q23, job, spouse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PROFESSIONAL 1 467 17.1 33.0 33.0 OWNER/PARTNER 2 251 9.2 17.7 50.7 UPPER-LEVEL MGMT 3 87 3.2 6.1 56.8 MIDDLE-LEVEL MGMT 4 133 4.9 9.4 66.2 SKILLED LABOR 5 208 7.6 14.7 80.9 UNSKILLED LABOR 6 54 2.0 3.8 84.7 OTHER 7 217 8.0 15.3 100.0 . 1308 48.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1417 Missing cases 1308 M18C month 1 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 955 35.0 50.3 50.3 1 945 34.7 49.7 100.0 . 825 30.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1900 Missing cases 825 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - M28C month 2 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 1 .0 .1 .1 1 239 8.8 12.6 12.7 2 1515 55.6 79.9 92.6 3 137 5.0 7.2 99.8 8 1 .0 .1 99.9 9 2 .1 .1 100.0 . 830 30.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1895 Missing cases 830 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - D18C day 1 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 698 25.6 36.9 36.9 1 718 26.3 37.9 74.8 2 362 13.3 19.1 93.9 3 116 4.3 6.1 100.0 . 831 30.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1894 Missing cases 831 D28C day 2 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 213 7.8 11.2 11.2 1 165 6.1 8.7 20.0 2 175 6.4 9.2 29.2 3 212 7.8 11.2 40.4 4 184 6.8 9.7 50.1 5 149 5.5 7.9 58.0 6 210 7.7 11.1 69.1 7 194 7.1 10.2 79.3 8 184 6.8 9.7 89.0 9 208 7.6 11.0 100.0 . 831 30.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1894 Missing cases 831 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RSPN88C 1988 C wave response Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO .00 818 30.0 30.0 30.0 YES 1.00 1907 70.0 70.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 *1992* INT92G2 Q1 Interest in pres campaign Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent very interested 1 1366 50.1 83.8 83.8 somewhat interested 2 209 7.7 12.8 96.6 not very interested 3 51 1.9 3.1 99.7 not at all intereste 4 5 .2 .3 100.0 . 1094 40.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1631 Missing cases 1094 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PART2 Q2 Participated in nomination race Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 807 29.6 49.6 49.6 no 2 821 30.1 50.4 100.0 . 1097 40.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1628 Missing cases 1097 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PARTPTY2 Q2 If yes, which party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent dem 1 441 16.2 54.2 54.2 rep 2 373 13.7 45.8 100.0 . 1911 70.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 814 Missing cases 1911 PREF92D Q3 Preferred candidate for 1992 D nom Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent brown 1 52 1.9 3.9 3.9 clinton 2 533 19.6 39.6 43.5 kerrey 3 51 1.9 3.8 47.3 harkin 4 178 6.5 13.2 60.5 tsongas 5 253 9.3 18.8 79.3 none of the above 6 278 10.2 20.7 100.0 . 1380 50.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1345 Missing cases 1380 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PREF92R Q3 Preferred candidate for 1992 R nom Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent buchanan 1 69 2.5 6.1 6.1 bush 2 670 24.6 58.8 64.8 none of the above 3 401 14.7 35.2 100.0 . 1585 58.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1140 Missing cases 1585 VOTE92 Q4 Vote in 1992 pres election Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent bush 1 614 22.5 38.2 38.2 clinton 2 891 32.7 55.4 93.6 perot 3 103 3.8 6.4 100.0 . 1097 40.3 Missing other 4 12 .4 Missing did not vote 5 8 .3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1608 Missing cases 1117 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HSEVOT92 Q5 Vote in House election Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent dem 1 852 31.3 54.4 54.4 rep 2 713 26.2 45.6 100.0 . 1103 40.5 Missing other 3 17 .6 Missing did not vote 4 40 1.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1565 Missing cases 1160 PTYID2 Q6 Describe your party affiliation Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strong dem 1 532 19.5 32.7 32.7 dem, not so strong 2 208 7.6 12.8 45.4 independent, lean de 3 165 6.1 10.1 55.6 independent 4 39 1.4 2.4 57.9 independent, lean re 5 84 3.1 5.2 63.1 rep, not so strong 6 150 5.5 9.2 72.3 strong rep 7 451 16.6 27.7 100.0 . 1092 40.1 Missing other party 8 4 .1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1629 Missing cases 1096 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ALWAYS2 Q7 Characterize self as someone who Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent work always 1 735 27.0 47.8 47.8 works candidates 2 802 29.4 52.2 100.0 . 1188 43.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1537 Missing cases 1188 LIBCON2 Q8 Describe your political philosophy Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent extremely lib 1 58 2.1 3.7 3.7 lib 2 316 11.6 19.9 23.6 slightly lib 3 236 8.7 14.9 38.4 middle-of-the road 4 248 9.1 15.6 54.1 slightly conservativ 5 247 9.1 15.6 69.6 conservative 6 436 16.0 27.5 97.1 extremely cons 7 46 1.7 2.9 100.0 . 1101 40.4 Missing not sure 8 37 1.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1587 Missing cases 1138 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INFL2 Q9 Between now and 1996, most likely to Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent work within dem pty 1 414 15.2 25.5 25.5 work within rep pty 2 397 14.6 24.4 49.9 work within 3rd part 3 23 .8 1.4 51.3 stay involved, but n 4 356 13.1 21.9 73.2 not be involved in p 5 162 5.9 10.0 83.1 not sure at this tim 6 274 10.1 16.9 100.0 . 1099 40.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1626 Missing cases 1099 SIGNJB2 Q10(BEFORE) Signatures, Brown Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2723 99.9 99.9 99.9 checked 1 2 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LMONJB2 Q10(BEFORE) Gave 100 or less, Brown Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2712 99.5 99.5 99.5 checked 1 13 .5 .5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HMONJB2 Q10(BEFORE) Gave > $100, Brown Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2723 99.9 99.9 99.9 checked 1 2 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 CANVJB2 Q10(BEFORE) Canvassing, Brown Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2721 99.9 99.9 99.9 checked 1 4 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVJB2 Q10(BEFORE) Convince friends, Brown Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2699 99.0 99.0 99.0 checked 1 26 1.0 1.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDJB2 Q10(BEFORE) Fundraising, Brown Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2720 99.8 99.8 99.8 checked 1 5 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 ATTJB2 Q10(BEFORE) Meeting/rally, Brown Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2704 99.2 99.2 99.2 checked 1 21 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SIGNBC2 Q10(BEFORE) Signatures, Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2698 99.0 99.0 99.0 checked 1 27 1.0 1.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LMONBC2 Q10(BEFORE) Gave 100 or less, Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2538 93.1 93.1 93.1 checked 1 187 6.9 6.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 HMONBC2 Q10(BEFORE) Gave > $100, Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2671 98.0 98.0 98.0 checked 1 54 2.0 2.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVBC2 Q10(BEFORE) Canvassing, Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2673 98.1 98.1 98.1 checked 1 52 1.9 1.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVBC2 Q10(BEFORE) Convince friends, Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2356 86.5 86.5 86.5 checked 1 369 13.5 13.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 FUNDBC2 Q10(BEFORE) Fundraising, Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2641 96.9 96.9 96.9 checked 1 84 3.1 3.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTBC2 Q10(BEFORE) Meeting/rally, Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2535 93.0 93.0 93.0 checked 1 190 7.0 7.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SIGNBK2 Q10(BEFORE) Signatures, Kerry Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2723 99.9 99.9 99.9 checked 1 2 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 LMONBK2 Q10(BEFORE) Gave 100 or less, Kerry Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2715 99.6 99.6 99.6 checked 1 10 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HMONBK2 Q10(BEFORE) Gave > $100, Kerry Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2723 99.9 99.9 99.9 checked 1 2 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVBK2 Q10(BEFORE) Canvassing, Kerry Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2722 99.9 99.9 99.9 checked 1 3 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 CONVBK2 Q10(BEFORE) Convince friends, Kerry Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2706 99.3 99.3 99.3 checked 1 19 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDBK2 Q10(BEFORE) Fundraising, Kerry Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2722 99.9 99.9 99.9 checked 1 3 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTBK2 Q10(BEFORE) Meeting/rally, Kerry Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2718 99.7 99.7 99.7 checked 1 7 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 SIGNPT2 Q10(BEFORE) Signatures, Tsongas Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2723 99.9 99.9 99.9 checked 1 2 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LMONPT2 Q10(BEFORE) Gave 100 or less, Tsongas Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2716 99.7 99.7 99.7 checked 1 9 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HMONPT2 Q10(BEFORE) Gave > $100, Tsongas Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2723 99.9 99.9 99.9 checked 1 2 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 CANVPT2 Q10(BEFORE) Canvassing, Tsongas Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2724 100.0 100.0 100.0 checked 1 1 .0 .0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVPT2 Q10(BEFORE) Convince friends, Tsongas Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2680 98.3 98.3 98.3 checked 1 45 1.7 1.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDPT2 Q10(BEFORE) Fundraising, Tsongas Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2723 99.9 99.9 99.9 checked 1 2 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 ATTPT2 Q10(BEFORE) Meeting/rally, Tsongas Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2714 99.6 99.6 99.6 checked 1 11 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SIGNTH2 Q10(BEFORE) Signatures, Harkin Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2713 99.6 99.6 99.6 checked 1 12 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LMONTH2 Q10(BEFORE) Gave 100 or less, Harkin Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2647 97.1 97.1 97.1 checked 1 78 2.9 2.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 HMONTH2 Q10(BEFORE) Gave > $100, Harkin Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2716 99.7 99.7 99.7 checked 1 9 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVTH2 Q10(BEFORE) Canvassing, Harkin Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2712 99.5 99.5 99.5 checked 1 13 .5 .5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVTH2 Q10(BEFORE) Convince friends, Harkin Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2642 97.0 97.0 97.0 checked 1 83 3.0 3.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 FUNDTH2 Q10(BEFORE) Fundraising, Harkin Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2695 98.9 98.9 98.9 checked 1 30 1.1 1.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTTH2 Q10(BEFORE) Meeting/rally, Harkin Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2653 97.4 97.4 97.4 checked 1 72 2.6 2.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SIGNGB2 Q10(BEFORE) Signatures, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2694 98.9 98.9 98.9 checked 1 31 1.1 1.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 LMONGB2 Q10(BEFORE) Gave 100 or less, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2498 91.7 91.7 91.7 checked 1 227 8.3 8.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HMONGB2 Q10(BEFORE) Gave > $100, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2640 96.9 96.9 96.9 checked 1 85 3.1 3.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVGB2 Q10(BEFORE) Canvassing, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2628 96.4 96.4 96.4 checked 1 97 3.6 3.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 CONVGB2 Q10(BEFORE) Convince friends, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2353 86.3 86.3 86.3 checked 1 372 13.7 13.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDGB2 Q10(BEFORE) Fundraising, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2591 95.1 95.1 95.1 checked 1 134 4.9 4.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTGB2 Q10(BEFORE) Meeting/rally, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2480 91.0 91.0 91.0 checked 1 245 9.0 9.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 SIGNPB2 Q10(BEFORE) Signatures, Buchanan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2722 99.9 99.9 99.9 checked 1 3 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LMONPB2 Q10(BEFORE) Gave 100 or less, Buchanan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2702 99.2 99.2 99.2 checked 1 23 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HMONPB2 Q10(BEFORE) Gave > $100, Buchanan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2718 99.7 99.7 99.7 checked 1 7 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 CANVPB2 Q10(BEFORE) Canvassing, Buchanan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2723 99.9 99.9 99.9 checked 1 2 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVPB2 Q10(BEFORE) Convince friends, Buchanan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2699 99.0 99.0 99.0 checked 1 26 1.0 1.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDPB2 Q10(BEFORE) Fundraising, Buchanan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2716 99.7 99.7 99.7 checked 1 9 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 ATTPB2 Q10(BEFORE) Meeting/rally, Buchanan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2708 99.4 99.4 99.4 checked 1 17 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SIGNRP2 Q10(BEFORE) Signatures, Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2700 99.1 99.1 99.1 checked 1 25 .9 .9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LMONRP2 Q10(BEFORE) Gave 100 or less, Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2714 99.6 99.6 99.6 checked 1 11 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 HMONRP2 Q10(BEFORE) Gave > $100, Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2725 100.0 100.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVRP2 Q10(BEFORE) Canvassing, Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2722 99.9 99.9 99.9 checked 1 3 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVRP2 Q10(BEFORE) Convince friends, Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2658 97.5 97.5 97.5 checked 1 67 2.5 2.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 FUNDRP2 Q10(BEFORE) Fundraising, Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2723 99.9 99.9 99.9 checked 1 2 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTRP2 Q10(BEFORE) Meeting/rally, Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2707 99.3 99.3 99.3 checked 1 18 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SIGNBQ2 Q11(AFTER) Signatures, Bush/Quayle Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2709 99.4 99.4 99.4 checked 1 16 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 LMONBQ2 Q11(AFTER) Gave $100 or less, Bush/Quayl Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2563 94.1 94.1 94.1 checked 1 162 5.9 5.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HMONBQ2 Q11(AFTER) Gave > $100, Bush/Quayle Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2663 97.7 97.7 97.7 checked 1 62 2.3 2.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVBQ2 Q11(AFTER) Canvassing, Bush/Quayle Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2613 95.9 95.9 95.9 checked 1 112 4.1 4.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 CONVBQ2 Q11(AFTER) Convince friends, Bush/Quayle Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2354 86.4 86.4 86.4 checked 1 371 13.6 13.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDBQ2 Q11(AFTER) Fundraising, Bush/Quayle Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2612 95.9 95.9 95.9 checked 1 113 4.1 4.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTBQ2 Q11(AFTER) Meeting/rally, Bush/Quayle Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2492 91.4 91.4 91.4 checked 1 233 8.6 8.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 SIGNCG2 Q11(AFTER) Signatures, Clinton/Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2710 99.4 99.4 99.4 checked 1 15 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LMONCG2 Q11(AFTER) Gave $100 or less, Clinton/Go Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2514 92.3 92.3 92.3 checked 1 211 7.7 7.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HMONCG2 Q11(AFTER) Gave > $100, Clinton/Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2658 97.5 97.5 97.5 checked 1 67 2.5 2.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 CANVCG2 Q11(AFTER) Canvassing, Clinton/Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2631 96.6 96.6 96.6 checked 1 94 3.4 3.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVCG2 Q11(AFTER) Convince friends, Clinton/Gor Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2187 80.3 80.3 80.3 checked 1 538 19.7 19.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDCG2 Q11(AFTER) Fundraising, Clinton/Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2610 95.8 95.8 95.8 checked 1 115 4.2 4.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 ATTCG2 Q11(AFTER) Meeting/rally, Clinton/Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2474 90.8 90.8 90.8 checked 1 251 9.2 9.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SIGNPS2 Q11(AFTER) Signatures, Perot/Stockdale Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2716 99.7 99.7 99.7 checked 1 9 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LMONPS2 Q11(AFTER) Gave $100 or less, Perot/Stoc Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2718 99.7 99.7 99.7 checked 1 7 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 HMONPS2 Q11(AFTER) Gave > $100, Perot/Stockdale Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2725 100.0 100.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVPS2 Q11(AFTER) Canvassing, Perot/Stockdale Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2721 99.9 99.9 99.9 checked 1 4 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVPS2 Q11(AFTER) Convince friends, Perot/Stock Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2670 98.0 98.0 98.0 checked 1 55 2.0 2.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 FUNDPS2 Q11(AFTER) Fundraising, Perot/Stockdale Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2724 100.0 100.0 100.0 checked 1 1 .0 .0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTPS2 Q11(AFTER) Meeting/rally, Perot/Stockdal Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2720 99.8 99.8 99.8 checked 1 5 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SIGNDH2 Q11(AFTER) Signatures, D Hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2713 99.6 99.6 99.6 checked 1 12 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 LMONDH2 Q11(AFTER) Gave $100 or less, D Hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2661 97.7 97.7 97.7 checked 1 64 2.3 2.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HMONDH2 Q11(AFTER) Gave > $100, D Hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2699 99.0 99.0 99.0 checked 1 26 1.0 1.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVDH2 Q11(AFTER) Canvassing, D Hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2695 98.9 98.9 98.9 checked 1 30 1.1 1.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 CONVDH2 Q11(AFTER) Convince friends, D Hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2585 94.9 94.9 94.9 checked 1 140 5.1 5.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDDH2 Q11(AFTER) Fundraising, D Hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2672 98.1 98.1 98.1 checked 1 53 1.9 1.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTDH2 Q11(AFTER) Meeting/rally, D Hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2639 96.8 96.8 96.8 checked 1 86 3.2 3.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 SIGNRH2 Q11(AFTER) Signatures, R Hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2694 98.9 98.9 98.9 checked 1 31 1.1 1.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LMONRH2 Q11(AFTER) Gave $100 or less, R Hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2618 96.1 96.1 96.1 checked 1 107 3.9 3.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HMONRH2 Q11(AFTER) Gave > $100, R Hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2682 98.4 98.4 98.4 checked 1 43 1.6 1.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 CANVRH2 Q11(AFTER) Canvassing, R Hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2671 98.0 98.0 98.0 checked 1 54 2.0 2.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVRH2 Q11(AFTER) Convince friends, R Hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2554 93.7 93.7 93.7 checked 1 171 6.3 6.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDRH2 Q11(AFTER) Fundraising, R Hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2640 96.9 96.9 96.9 checked 1 85 3.1 3.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 ATTRH2 Q11(AFTER) Meeting/rally, R Hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2604 95.6 95.6 95.6 checked 1 121 4.4 4.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SIGNDS2 Q11(AFTER) Signatures, D state cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2711 99.5 99.5 99.5 checked 1 14 .5 .5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LMONDS2 Q11(AFTER) Gave $100 or less, D state ca Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2633 96.6 96.6 96.6 checked 1 92 3.4 3.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 HMONDS2 Q11(AFTER) Gave > $100, D state cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2699 99.0 99.0 99.0 checked 1 26 1.0 1.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVDS2 Q11(AFTER) Canvassing, D state cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2690 98.7 98.7 98.7 checked 1 35 1.3 1.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVDS2 Q11(AFTER) Convince friends, D state can Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2570 94.3 94.3 94.3 checked 1 155 5.7 5.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 FUNDDS2 Q11(AFTER) Fundraising, D state cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2664 97.8 97.8 97.8 checked 1 61 2.2 2.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTDS2 Q11(AFTER) Meeting/rally, D state cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2644 97.0 97.0 97.0 checked 1 81 3.0 3.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SIGNRS2 Q11(AFTER) Signatures, R state cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2682 98.4 98.4 98.4 checked 1 43 1.6 1.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 LMONRS2 Q11(AFTER) Gave $100 or less, R state ca Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2598 95.3 95.3 95.3 checked 1 127 4.7 4.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HMONRS2 Q11(AFTER) Gave > $100, R state cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2677 98.2 98.2 98.2 checked 1 48 1.8 1.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVRS2 Q11(AFTER) Canvassing, R state cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2661 97.7 97.7 97.7 checked 1 64 2.3 2.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 CONVRS2 Q11(AFTER) Convince friends, R state can Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2543 93.3 93.3 93.3 checked 1 182 6.7 6.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDRS2 Q11(AFTER) Fundraising, R state cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2629 96.5 96.5 96.5 checked 1 96 3.5 3.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTRS2 Q11(AFTER) Meeting/rally, R state cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2605 95.6 95.6 95.6 checked 1 120 4.4 4.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 CAMPPRD2 Q12 Active in Dem presidential campaigns Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent very active 1 112 4.1 11.5 11.5 fairly active 2 246 9.0 25.2 36.7 not very active 3 285 10.5 29.2 65.9 not active at all 4 333 12.2 34.1 100.0 . 1749 64.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 976 Missing cases 1749 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CMSEND2 Q12 Active in Dem Senate campaigns Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent very active 1 76 2.8 9.0 9.0 fairly active 2 171 6.3 20.3 29.3 not very active 3 223 8.2 26.4 55.7 not active at all 4 374 13.7 44.3 100.0 . 1881 69.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 844 Missing cases 1881 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CMHSED2 Q12 Active in Dem House campaigns Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent very active 1 98 3.6 11.0 11.0 fairly active 2 212 7.8 23.7 34.7 not very active 3 231 8.5 25.9 60.6 not active at all 4 352 12.9 39.4 100.0 . 1832 67.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 893 Missing cases 1832 CMGOVD2 Q12 Active in Dem Gov campaigns Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent very active 1 107 3.9 12.7 12.7 fairly active 2 171 6.3 20.2 32.9 not very active 3 195 7.2 23.1 56.0 not active at all 4 372 13.7 44.0 100.0 . 1880 69.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 845 Missing cases 1880 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CMSTD2 Q12 Active in Dem state campaigns Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent very active 1 91 3.3 10.8 10.8 fairly active 2 181 6.6 21.5 32.3 not very active 3 208 7.6 24.7 57.1 not active at all 4 361 13.2 42.9 100.0 . 1884 69.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 841 Missing cases 1884 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CMLOCD2 Q12 Active in Dem local campaigns Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent very active 1 154 5.7 17.2 17.2 fairly active 2 225 8.3 25.1 42.3 not very active 3 197 7.2 22.0 64.2 not active at all 4 321 11.8 35.8 100.0 . 1828 67.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 897 Missing cases 1828 CAMPPRR2 Q12 Active in Rep presidential campaigns Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent very active 1 109 4.0 12.9 12.9 fairly active 2 228 8.4 26.9 39.7 not very active 3 182 6.7 21.5 61.2 not active at all 4 329 12.1 38.8 100.0 . 1877 68.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 848 Missing cases 1877 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CMSENR2 Q12 Active in Rep Senate campaigns Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent very active 1 85 3.1 11.0 11.0 fairly active 2 192 7.0 24.9 35.9 not very active 3 158 5.8 20.5 56.3 not active at all 4 337 12.4 43.7 100.0 . 1953 71.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 772 Missing cases 1953 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CMHSE2 Q12 Active in Rep House campaigns Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent very active 1 120 4.4 14.6 14.6 fairly active 2 222 8.1 27.0 41.7 not very active 3 166 6.1 20.2 61.9 not active at all 4 313 11.5 38.1 100.0 . 1904 69.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 821 Missing cases 1904 CMGOVR2 Q12 Active in Rep Gov campaigns Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent very active 1 122 4.5 15.9 15.9 fairly active 2 184 6.8 23.9 39.8 not very active 3 138 5.1 17.9 57.7 not active at all 4 325 11.9 42.3 100.0 . 1956 71.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 769 Missing cases 1956 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CMSTR2 Q12 Active in Rep state campaigns Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent very active 1 126 4.6 16.0 16.0 fairly active 2 198 7.3 25.2 41.2 not very active 3 144 5.3 18.3 59.5 not active at all 4 318 11.7 40.5 100.0 . 1939 71.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 786 Missing cases 1939 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CMLOCR2 Q12 Active in Rep local campaigns Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent very active 1 169 6.2 20.8 20.8 fairly active 2 216 7.9 26.6 47.4 not very active 3 128 4.7 15.7 63.1 not active at all 4 300 11.0 36.9 100.0 . 1912 70.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 813 Missing cases 1912 MEMBD2 Q13 Member local Dem party committee Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent currently hold 1 137 5.0 38.2 38.2 formerly held 2 222 8.1 61.8 100.0 . 2366 86.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 359 Missing cases 2366 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CHAIRD2 Q13 Chair local Dem party committee Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent currently hold 1 14 .5 17.7 17.7 formerly held 2 65 2.4 82.3 100.0 . 2646 97.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 79 Missing cases 2646 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LOCALD2 Q13 Elected local office, Dem Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent currently hold 1 19 .7 38.8 38.8 formerly held 2 30 1.1 61.2 100.0 . 2676 98.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 49 Missing cases 2676 STNATD2 Q13 Elected state/natl office, Dem Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent currently hold 1 3 .1 60.0 60.0 formerly held 2 2 .1 40.0 100.0 . 2720 99.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 5 Missing cases 2720 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - APPTD2 Q13 Appointed govt/pol office, Dem Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent currently hold 1 27 1.0 54.0 54.0 formerly held 2 23 .8 46.0 100.0 . 2675 98.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 50 Missing cases 2675 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PAIDSTD2 Q13 Paid position, Dem Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent currently hold 1 6 .2 21.4 21.4 formerly held 2 22 .8 78.6 100.0 . 2697 99.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 28 Missing cases 2697 DELSTD2 Q13 Delegate to Dem state convention Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent currently hold 1 58 2.1 24.7 24.7 formerly held 2 177 6.5 75.3 100.0 . 2490 91.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 235 Missing cases 2490 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MEMBR2 Q13 Member local Rep party committee Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent currently hold 1 193 7.1 42.0 42.0 formerly held 2 267 9.8 58.0 100.0 . 2265 83.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 460 Missing cases 2265 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CHAIRR2 Q13 Chair local Rep party committee Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent currently hold 1 35 1.3 21.0 21.0 formerly held 2 132 4.8 79.0 100.0 . 2558 93.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 167 Missing cases 2558 LOCALR2 Q13 Elected local office, Rep Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent currently hold 1 43 1.6 39.4 39.4 formerly held 2 66 2.4 60.6 100.0 . 2616 96.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 109 Missing cases 2616 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - STNATR2 Q13 Elected state/natl office, Rep Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent currently hold 1 8 .3 28.6 28.6 formerly held 2 20 .7 71.4 100.0 . 2697 99.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 28 Missing cases 2697 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - APPTR2 Q13 Appointed govt/pol office, Rep Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent currently hold 1 27 1.0 34.2 34.2 formerly held 2 52 1.9 65.8 100.0 . 2646 97.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 79 Missing cases 2646 PAIDSTR2 Q13 Paid position, Rep Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent currently hold 1 4 .1 8.0 8.0 formerly held 2 46 1.7 92.0 100.0 . 2675 98.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 50 Missing cases 2675 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DELSTR2 Q13 Delegate to Rep state convention Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent currently hold 1 112 4.1 26.0 26.0 formerly held 2 319 11.7 74.0 100.0 . 2294 84.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 431 Missing cases 2294 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FSTPR2 Q14a First active in pres campaign Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2166 79.5 79.5 79.5 checked 1 559 20.5 20.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 FSTGUB2 Q14a First active in gub campaign Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2610 95.8 95.8 95.8 checked 1 115 4.2 4.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FSTSEN2 Q14a First active in Sen campaign Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2617 96.0 96.0 96.0 checked 1 108 4.0 4.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FSTHR2 Q14a First active in House campaign Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2564 94.1 94.1 94.1 checked 1 161 5.9 5.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 FSTST2 Q14a First active in state leg campaign Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2541 93.2 93.2 93.2 checked 1 184 6.8 6.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FSTLOC2 Q14a First active in local campaign Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2283 83.8 83.8 83.8 checked 1 442 16.2 16.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FSTDK2 Q14a Cannot recall first activity Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent not checked 0 2502 91.8 91.8 91.8 checked 1 223 8.2 8.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 FST92 Q14b Was 1992 first year active Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 20 .7 1.3 1.3 no 2 1501 55.1 98.7 100.0 . 1204 44.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1521 Missing cases 1204 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CAM922 Q15 Involved in pres generl election Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 690 25.3 43.9 43.9 no 2 882 32.4 56.1 100.0 . 1153 42.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1572 Missing cases 1153 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TRUST2 Q16 Trust government in DC to do right Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent always 1 12 .4 .7 .7 most of the time 2 450 16.5 27.8 28.5 only some of the tim 3 960 35.2 59.3 87.8 never 4 197 7.2 12.2 100.0 . 1106 40.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1619 Missing cases 1106 GOVRUN2 Q17 In general, government is Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent run by a few 1 1195 43.9 77.4 77.4 run for the all peop 2 348 12.8 22.6 100.0 . 1182 43.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1543 Missing cases 1182 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABORT2 Q18a Opinion - abortion amendment Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 260 9.5 17.0 17.0 favor 2 145 5.3 9.5 26.5 slightly favor 3 86 3.2 5.6 32.1 slightly oppose 5 67 2.5 4.4 36.5 oppose 6 233 8.6 15.2 51.7 strongly oppose 7 739 27.1 48.3 100.0 . 1122 41.2 Missing not sure 4 73 2.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1530 Missing cases 1195 AFFACT2 Q18a Opinion - affirmative action Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 168 6.2 11.9 11.9 favor 2 326 12.0 23.2 35.1 slightly favor 3 281 10.3 20.0 55.1 slightly oppose 5 139 5.1 9.9 65.0 oppose 6 259 9.5 18.4 83.4 strongly oppose 7 233 8.6 16.6 100.0 . 1134 41.6 Missing not sure 4 185 6.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1406 Missing cases 1319 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BALBUD2 Q18a Opinion - balanced budget amendment Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 564 20.7 39.2 39.2 favor 2 334 12.3 23.2 62.4 slightly favor 3 168 6.2 11.7 74.0 slightly oppose 5 61 2.2 4.2 78.3 oppose 6 169 6.2 11.7 90.0 strongly oppose 7 144 5.3 10.0 100.0 . 1126 41.3 Missing not sure 4 159 5.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1440 Missing cases 1285 IMPORT2 Q18a Opinion - limits on foreign imports Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 362 13.3 26.0 26.0 favor 2 307 11.3 22.1 48.1 slightly favor 3 272 10.0 19.6 67.7 slightly oppose 5 141 5.2 10.1 77.8 oppose 6 201 7.4 14.5 92.3 strongly oppose 7 107 3.9 7.7 100.0 . 1134 41.6 Missing not sure 4 201 7.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1390 Missing cases 1335 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NHI2 Q18a Opinion - national health insurance Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 473 17.4 32.6 32.6 favor 2 318 11.7 21.9 54.4 slightly favor 3 181 6.6 12.5 66.9 slightly oppose 5 82 3.0 5.6 72.5 oppose 6 168 6.2 11.6 84.1 strongly oppose 7 231 8.5 15.9 100.0 . 1129 41.4 Missing not sure 4 143 5.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1453 Missing cases 1272 POLLUT2 Q18a Opinion - gov regulate pollution Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 380 13.9 26.0 26.0 favor 2 424 15.6 29.0 55.0 slightly favor 3 253 9.3 17.3 72.2 slightly oppose 5 112 4.1 7.7 79.9 oppose 6 174 6.4 11.9 91.8 strongly oppose 7 120 4.4 8.2 100.0 . 1130 41.5 Missing not sure 4 132 4.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1463 Missing cases 1262 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - USFOR2 Q18a Opinion - decreased US involvement Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 212 7.8 15.0 15.0 favor 2 310 11.4 21.9 36.9 slightly favor 3 362 13.3 25.6 62.4 slightly oppose 5 199 7.3 14.1 76.5 oppose 6 255 9.4 18.0 94.5 strongly oppose 7 78 2.9 5.5 100.0 . 1136 41.7 Missing not sure 4 173 6.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1416 Missing cases 1309 TERMLIM2 Q18a Opinion - term limits Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 512 18.8 34.6 34.6 favor 2 311 11.4 21.0 55.6 slightly favor 3 139 5.1 9.4 65.0 slightly oppose 5 83 3.0 5.6 70.7 oppose 6 199 7.3 13.5 84.1 strongly oppose 7 235 8.6 15.9 100.0 . 1124 41.2 Missing not sure 4 122 4.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1479 Missing cases 1246 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GASTAX2 Q18a Opinion - Federal gas tax Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 111 4.1 8.0 8.0 favor 2 219 8.0 15.7 23.7 slightly favor 3 228 8.4 16.4 40.1 slightly oppose 5 148 5.4 10.6 50.7 oppose 6 331 12.1 23.8 74.4 strongly oppose 7 356 13.1 25.6 100.0 . 1121 41.1 Missing not sure 4 211 7.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1393 Missing cases 1332 SOCSEC2 Q18a Opinion - increase soc sec tax Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 349 12.8 23.8 23.8 favor 2 449 16.5 30.6 54.5 slightly favor 3 221 8.1 15.1 69.6 slightly oppose 5 91 3.3 6.2 75.8 oppose 6 176 6.5 12.0 87.8 strongly oppose 7 179 6.6 12.2 100.0 . 1134 41.6 Missing not sure 4 126 4.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1465 Missing cases 1260 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HOMO2 Q18a Opinion - homosexuals in military Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 134 4.9 10.1 10.1 favor 2 297 10.9 22.4 32.5 slightly favor 3 154 5.7 11.6 44.2 slightly oppose 5 88 3.2 6.6 50.8 oppose 6 183 6.7 13.8 64.6 strongly oppose 7 469 17.2 35.4 100.0 . 1134 41.6 Missing not sure 4 266 9.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1325 Missing cases 1400 DEATH2 Q18a Opinion - eliminate death penalty Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 196 7.2 13.6 13.6 favor 2 129 4.7 9.0 22.6 slightly favor 3 79 2.9 5.5 28.0 slightly oppose 5 113 4.1 7.8 35.9 oppose 6 377 13.8 26.2 62.0 strongly oppose 7 547 20.1 38.0 100.0 . 1123 41.2 Missing not sure 4 161 5.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1441 Missing cases 1284 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MIISS2 Q18b Issue most important to you Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ABORTION 1 262 9.6 17.2 17.2 AFFIRMATIVE ACTION 2 59 2.2 3.9 21.1 BALANCED BUDGET 3 387 14.2 25.4 46.5 IMPORTS 4 100 3.7 6.6 53.1 NATL HEALTH INS 5 406 14.9 26.7 79.8 POLLUTION 6 72 2.6 4.7 84.5 ISOLATIONISM 7 35 1.3 2.3 86.8 TERM LIMITS 8 95 3.5 6.2 93.0 GAS TAX 9 20 .7 1.3 94.3 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 10 28 1.0 1.8 96.2 HOMOSEXUALS 11 35 1.3 2.3 98.5 DEATH PENALTY 12 23 .8 1.5 100.0 . 1149 42.2 Missing NOT SURE 13 54 2.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1522 Missing cases 1203 LCGB2 Q19 Political philosophy, George Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent extremely lib 1 6 .2 .4 .4 lib 2 20 .7 1.4 1.8 slightly lib 3 41 1.5 2.8 4.5 middle-of-the road 4 132 4.8 8.9 13.4 slightly conservativ 5 265 9.7 17.9 31.3 conservative 6 785 28.8 53.0 84.3 extremely cons 7 232 8.5 15.7 100.0 . 1167 42.8 Missing not sure 8 77 2.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1481 Missing cases 1244 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCBC2 Q19 Political philosophy, Bill Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent extremely lib 1 190 7.0 12.5 12.5 lib 2 545 20.0 35.8 48.3 slightly lib 3 411 15.1 27.0 75.2 middle-of-the road 4 287 10.5 18.8 94.1 slightly conservativ 5 63 2.3 4.1 98.2 conservative 6 20 .7 1.3 99.5 extremely cons 7 7 .3 .5 100.0 . 1157 42.5 Missing not sure 8 45 1.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1523 Missing cases 1202 LCHRP2 Q19 Political philosophy, H Ross Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent extremely lib 1 37 1.4 3.1 3.1 lib 2 104 3.8 8.6 11.7 slightly lib 3 123 4.5 10.2 21.9 middle-of-the road 4 228 8.4 18.9 40.8 slightly conservativ 5 213 7.8 17.6 58.4 conservative 6 346 12.7 28.7 87.1 extremely cons 7 156 5.7 12.9 100.0 . 1197 43.9 Missing not sure 8 321 11.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1207 Missing cases 1518 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCAG2 Q19 Political philosophy, Al Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent extremely lib 1 306 11.2 21.3 21.3 lib 2 492 18.1 34.2 55.5 slightly lib 3 329 12.1 22.9 78.4 middle-of-the road 4 217 8.0 15.1 93.5 slightly conservativ 5 64 2.3 4.5 98.0 conservative 6 20 .7 1.4 99.4 extremely cons 7 9 .3 .6 100.0 . 1216 44.6 Missing not sure 8 72 2.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1437 Missing cases 1288 LCDQ2 Q19 Political philosophy, Dan Quayle Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent extremely lib 1 6 .2 .4 .4 lib 2 9 .3 .6 1.1 slightly lib 3 9 .3 .6 1.7 middle-of-the road 4 47 1.7 3.4 5.1 slightly conservativ 5 103 3.8 7.4 12.6 conservative 6 593 21.8 42.8 55.3 extremely cons 7 619 22.7 44.7 100.0 . 1219 44.7 Missing not sure 8 120 4.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1386 Missing cases 1339 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCJS Q19 Political philosophy, James Stockdal Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent extremely lib 1 11 .4 1.6 1.6 lib 2 33 1.2 4.7 6.2 slightly lib 3 24 .9 3.4 9.6 middle-of-the road 4 122 4.5 17.3 26.9 slightly conservativ 5 102 3.7 14.4 41.4 conservative 6 268 9.8 38.0 79.3 extremely cons 7 146 5.4 20.7 100.0 . 1253 46.0 Missing not sure 8 766 28.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 706 Missing cases 2019 LCPB2 Q19 Political philosophy, Pat Buchanan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent extremely lib 1 9 .3 .7 .7 lib 2 13 .5 1.0 1.7 slightly lib 3 9 .3 .7 2.4 middle-of-the road 4 24 .9 1.9 4.3 slightly conservativ 5 27 1.0 2.1 6.4 conservative 6 153 5.6 12.0 18.4 extremely cons 7 1041 38.2 81.6 100.0 . 1243 45.6 Missing not sure 8 206 7.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1276 Missing cases 1449 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCJJ2 Q19 Political philosophy, Jesse Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent extremely lib 1 819 30.1 58.7 58.7 lib 2 414 15.2 29.7 88.3 slightly lib 3 76 2.8 5.4 93.8 middle-of-the road 4 54 2.0 3.9 97.6 slightly conservativ 5 8 .3 .6 98.2 conservative 6 10 .4 .7 98.9 extremely cons 7 15 .6 1.1 100.0 . 1225 45.0 Missing not sure 8 104 3.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1396 Missing cases 1329 LCRR2 Q19 Political philosophy, Ronald Reagan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent extremely lib 1 12 .4 .8 .8 lib 2 12 .4 .8 1.7 slightly lib 3 14 .5 1.0 2.7 middle-of-the road 4 57 2.1 4.0 6.7 slightly conservativ 5 78 2.9 5.5 12.3 conservative 6 577 21.2 40.9 53.1 extremely cons 7 662 24.3 46.9 100.0 . 1216 44.6 Missing not sure 8 97 3.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1412 Missing cases 1313 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCAVAM2 Q19 Political philosophy, Avg voter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent extremely lib 1 3 .1 .2 .2 lib 2 50 1.8 3.5 3.7 slightly lib 3 182 6.7 12.7 16.4 middle-of-the road 4 606 22.2 42.4 58.9 slightly conservativ 5 455 16.7 31.8 90.7 conservative 6 125 4.6 8.7 99.4 extremely cons 7 8 .3 .6 100.0 . 1198 44.0 Missing not sure 8 98 3.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1429 Missing cases 1296 LCAVHRP2 Q19 Political philosophy, Avg Perot supp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent extremely lib 1 22 .8 1.8 1.8 lib 2 50 1.8 4.1 5.9 slightly lib 3 106 3.9 8.7 14.6 middle-of-the road 4 266 9.8 21.8 36.3 slightly conservativ 5 342 12.6 28.0 64.3 conservative 6 345 12.7 28.2 92.6 extremely cons 7 91 3.3 7.4 100.0 . 1234 45.3 Missing not sure 8 269 9.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1222 Missing cases 1503 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCDP2 Q19 Political philosophy, D Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent extremely lib 1 243 8.9 16.7 16.7 lib 2 620 22.8 42.7 59.4 slightly lib 3 373 13.7 25.7 85.1 middle-of-the road 4 151 5.5 10.4 95.5 slightly conservativ 5 35 1.3 2.4 97.9 conservative 6 26 1.0 1.8 99.7 extremely cons 7 4 .1 .3 100.0 . 1223 44.9 Missing not sure 8 50 1.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1452 Missing cases 1273 LCRP2 Q19 Political philosophy, R Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent extremely lib 1 5 .2 .4 .4 lib 2 12 .4 .9 1.2 slightly lib 3 18 .7 1.3 2.5 middle-of-the road 4 64 2.3 4.6 7.1 slightly conservativ 5 227 8.3 16.2 23.3 conservative 6 767 28.1 54.7 78.0 extremely cons 7 309 11.3 22.0 100.0 . 1242 45.6 Missing not sure 8 81 3.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1402 Missing cases 1323 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCDH2 Q19 Political philosophy, D Hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent extremely lib 1 187 6.9 14.6 14.6 lib 2 451 16.6 35.2 49.8 slightly lib 3 305 11.2 23.8 73.6 middle-of-the road 4 211 7.7 16.5 90.0 slightly conservativ 5 59 2.2 4.6 94.6 conservative 6 55 2.0 4.3 98.9 extremely cons 7 14 .5 1.1 100.0 . 1309 48.0 Missing not sure 8 134 4.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1282 Missing cases 1443 LCRH2 Q19 Political philosophy, R Hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent extremely lib 1 5 .2 .4 .4 lib 2 20 .7 1.6 2.0 slightly lib 3 26 1.0 2.1 4.0 middle-of-the road 4 133 4.9 10.5 14.5 slightly conservativ 5 236 8.7 18.6 33.1 conservative 6 572 21.0 45.1 78.2 extremely cons 7 276 10.1 21.8 100.0 . 1274 46.8 Missing not sure 8 183 6.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1268 Missing cases 1457 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AFACGB2 Q20 Affirm action, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 18 .7 1.3 1.3 favor 2 110 4.0 8.2 9.5 slightly favor 3 221 8.1 16.4 26.0 slightly oppose 5 253 9.3 18.8 44.8 oppose 6 480 17.6 35.7 80.5 strongly oppose 7 262 9.6 19.5 100.0 . 1194 43.8 Missing not sure 4 187 6.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1344 Missing cases 1381 AFACBC2 Q20 Affirm action, Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 373 13.7 28.1 28.1 favor 2 593 21.8 44.7 72.8 slightly favor 3 322 11.8 24.3 97.1 slightly oppose 5 21 .8 1.6 98.6 oppose 6 9 .3 .7 99.3 strongly oppose 7 9 .3 .7 100.0 . 1182 43.4 Missing not sure 4 216 7.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1327 Missing cases 1398 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AFACHRP2 Q20 Affirm action, Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 62 2.3 7.7 7.7 favor 2 151 5.5 18.8 26.6 slightly favor 3 176 6.5 21.9 48.5 slightly oppose 5 139 5.1 17.3 65.8 oppose 6 191 7.0 23.8 89.7 strongly oppose 7 83 3.0 10.3 100.0 . 1232 45.2 Missing not sure 4 691 25.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 802 Missing cases 1923 AFACAM2 Q20 Affirm action, Avg voter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 30 1.1 2.6 2.6 favor 2 89 3.3 7.7 10.2 slightly favor 3 344 12.6 29.6 39.9 slightly oppose 5 433 15.9 37.3 77.2 oppose 6 232 8.5 20.0 97.2 strongly oppose 7 33 1.2 2.8 100.0 . 1228 45.1 Missing not sure 4 336 12.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1161 Missing cases 1564 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AFACDP2 Q20 Affirm action, D Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 338 12.4 24.7 24.7 favor 2 630 23.1 46.1 70.8 slightly favor 3 357 13.1 26.1 96.9 slightly oppose 5 28 1.0 2.0 98.9 oppose 6 7 .3 .5 99.4 strongly oppose 7 8 .3 .6 100.0 . 1210 44.4 Missing not sure 4 147 5.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1368 Missing cases 1357 AFACRP2 Q20 Affirm action, R Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 11 .4 .8 .8 favor 2 76 2.8 5.8 6.7 slightly favor 3 166 6.1 12.7 19.4 slightly oppose 5 312 11.4 23.9 43.3 oppose 6 530 19.4 40.6 83.8 strongly oppose 7 211 7.7 16.2 100.0 . 1224 44.9 Missing not sure 4 195 7.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1306 Missing cases 1419 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMPGB2 Q20 Foreign imports, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 41 1.5 3.0 3.0 favor 2 121 4.4 8.8 11.7 slightly favor 3 151 5.5 10.9 22.7 slightly oppose 5 207 7.6 15.0 37.7 oppose 6 491 18.0 35.6 73.3 strongly oppose 7 369 13.5 26.7 100.0 . 1209 44.4 Missing not sure 4 136 5.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1380 Missing cases 1345 IMPBC2 Q20 Foreign imports, Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 208 7.6 16.6 16.6 favor 2 476 17.5 38.0 54.5 slightly favor 3 370 13.6 29.5 84.1 slightly oppose 5 119 4.4 9.5 93.5 oppose 6 58 2.1 4.6 98.2 strongly oppose 7 23 .8 1.8 100.0 . 1190 43.7 Missing not sure 4 281 10.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1254 Missing cases 1471 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMPHRP2 Q20 Foreign imports, Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 264 9.7 25.8 25.8 favor 2 368 13.5 36.0 61.8 slightly favor 3 170 6.2 16.6 78.5 slightly oppose 5 77 2.8 7.5 86.0 oppose 6 94 3.4 9.2 95.2 strongly oppose 7 49 1.8 4.8 100.0 . 1247 45.8 Missing not sure 4 456 16.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1022 Missing cases 1703 IMPAM2 Q20 Foreign imports, Avg voter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 174 6.4 14.3 14.3 favor 2 478 17.5 39.2 53.5 slightly favor 3 420 15.4 34.5 88.0 slightly oppose 5 93 3.4 7.6 95.6 oppose 6 41 1.5 3.4 99.0 strongly oppose 7 12 .4 1.0 100.0 . 1232 45.2 Missing not sure 4 275 10.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1218 Missing cases 1507 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMPDP2 Q20 Foreign imports, D Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 257 9.4 20.3 20.3 favor 2 563 20.7 44.5 64.8 slightly favor 3 313 11.5 24.7 89.5 slightly oppose 5 65 2.4 5.1 94.6 oppose 6 51 1.9 4.0 98.7 strongly oppose 7 17 .6 1.3 100.0 . 1224 44.9 Missing not sure 4 235 8.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1266 Missing cases 1459 IMPRP2 Q20 Foreign imports, R Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 33 1.2 2.7 2.7 favor 2 121 4.4 9.7 12.4 slightly favor 3 156 5.7 12.6 25.0 slightly oppose 5 263 9.7 21.2 46.1 oppose 6 491 18.0 39.5 85.7 strongly oppose 7 178 6.5 14.3 100.0 . 1240 45.5 Missing not sure 4 243 8.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1242 Missing cases 1483 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NHIGB2 Q20 Natl health ins, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 11 .4 .8 .8 favor 2 50 1.8 3.6 4.4 slightly favor 3 114 4.2 8.1 12.5 slightly oppose 5 181 6.6 12.9 25.4 oppose 6 561 20.6 40.0 65.4 strongly oppose 7 485 17.8 34.6 100.0 . 1200 44.0 Missing not sure 4 123 4.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1402 Missing cases 1323 NHIBC2 Q20 Natl health ins, Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 645 23.7 43.5 43.5 favor 2 659 24.2 44.4 87.9 slightly favor 3 154 5.7 10.4 98.2 slightly oppose 5 16 .6 1.1 99.3 oppose 6 6 .2 .4 99.7 strongly oppose 7 4 .1 .3 100.0 . 1169 42.9 Missing not sure 4 72 2.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1484 Missing cases 1241 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NHIHRP2 Q20 Natl health ins, Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 92 3.4 11.2 11.2 favor 2 261 9.6 31.7 42.8 slightly favor 3 231 8.5 28.0 70.9 slightly oppose 5 86 3.2 10.4 81.3 oppose 6 99 3.6 12.0 93.3 strongly oppose 7 55 2.0 6.7 100.0 . 1232 45.2 Missing not sure 4 669 24.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 824 Missing cases 1901 NHIAM2 Q20 Natl health ins, Avg voter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 212 7.8 16.9 16.9 favor 2 459 16.8 36.7 53.6 slightly favor 3 450 16.5 36.0 89.6 slightly oppose 5 80 2.9 6.4 96.0 oppose 6 44 1.6 3.5 99.5 strongly oppose 7 6 .2 .5 100.0 . 1225 45.0 Missing not sure 4 249 9.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1251 Missing cases 1474 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NHIDP2 Q20 Natl health ins, D Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 484 17.8 34.3 34.3 favor 2 694 25.5 49.1 83.4 slightly favor 3 217 8.0 15.4 98.7 slightly oppose 5 9 .3 .6 99.4 oppose 6 3 .1 .2 99.6 strongly oppose 7 6 .2 .4 100.0 . 1201 44.1 Missing not sure 4 111 4.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1413 Missing cases 1312 NHIRP2 Q20 Natl health ins, R Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 18 .7 1.4 1.4 favor 2 47 1.7 3.5 4.9 slightly favor 3 122 4.5 9.2 14.1 slightly oppose 5 255 9.4 19.2 33.3 oppose 6 591 21.7 44.6 77.9 strongly oppose 7 293 10.8 22.1 100.0 . 1220 44.8 Missing not sure 4 179 6.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1326 Missing cases 1399 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GASGB2 Q20 Federal gas tax, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 36 1.3 2.9 2.9 favor 2 48 1.8 3.8 6.7 slightly favor 3 69 2.5 5.5 12.2 slightly oppose 5 178 6.5 14.2 26.5 oppose 6 562 20.6 44.9 71.4 strongly oppose 7 358 13.1 28.6 100.0 . 1211 44.4 Missing not sure 4 263 9.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1251 Missing cases 1474 GASBC2 Q20 Federal gas tax, Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 156 5.7 13.8 13.8 favor 2 291 10.7 25.8 39.6 slightly favor 3 358 13.1 31.7 71.4 slightly oppose 5 125 4.6 11.1 82.4 oppose 6 149 5.5 13.2 95.7 strongly oppose 7 49 1.8 4.3 100.0 . 1191 43.7 Missing not sure 4 406 14.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1128 Missing cases 1597 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GASHRP2 Q20 Federal gas tax, Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 948 34.8 72.8 72.8 favor 2 224 8.2 17.2 90.0 slightly favor 3 53 1.9 4.1 94.1 slightly oppose 5 27 1.0 2.1 96.2 oppose 6 25 .9 1.9 98.1 strongly oppose 7 25 .9 1.9 100.0 . 1220 44.8 Missing not sure 4 203 7.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1302 Missing cases 1423 GASAM2 Q20 Federal gas tax, Avg voter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 14 .5 1.2 1.2 favor 2 29 1.1 2.5 3.6 slightly favor 3 143 5.2 12.1 15.8 slightly oppose 5 295 10.8 25.0 40.8 oppose 6 479 17.6 40.6 81.4 strongly oppose 7 220 8.1 18.6 100.0 . 1239 45.5 Missing not sure 4 306 11.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1180 Missing cases 1545 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GASDP2 Q20 Federal gas tax, D Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 124 4.6 11.8 11.8 favor 2 231 8.5 22.0 33.8 slightly favor 3 329 12.1 31.3 65.1 slightly oppose 5 133 4.9 12.7 77.7 oppose 6 168 6.2 16.0 93.7 strongly oppose 7 66 2.4 6.3 100.0 . 1234 45.3 Missing not sure 4 440 16.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1051 Missing cases 1674 GASRP2 Q20 Federal gas tax, R Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 24 .9 2.1 2.1 favor 2 40 1.5 3.5 5.5 slightly favor 3 78 2.9 6.8 12.3 slightly oppose 5 216 7.9 18.7 31.0 oppose 6 529 19.4 45.8 76.9 strongly oppose 7 267 9.8 23.1 100.0 . 1242 45.6 Missing not sure 4 329 12.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1154 Missing cases 1571 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TERMGB2 Q20 Term limits, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 313 11.5 27.8 27.8 favor 2 315 11.6 28.0 55.8 slightly favor 3 123 4.5 10.9 66.8 slightly oppose 5 64 2.3 5.7 72.4 oppose 6 187 6.9 16.6 89.1 strongly oppose 7 123 4.5 10.9 100.0 . 1218 44.7 Missing not sure 4 382 14.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1125 Missing cases 1600 TERMBC2 Q20 Term limits, Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 63 2.3 6.5 6.5 favor 2 128 4.7 13.1 19.6 slightly favor 3 124 4.6 12.7 32.3 slightly oppose 5 111 4.1 11.4 43.7 oppose 6 341 12.5 35.0 78.7 strongly oppose 7 208 7.6 21.3 100.0 . 1197 43.9 Missing not sure 4 553 20.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 975 Missing cases 1750 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TERMHRP2 Q20 Term limits, Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 319 11.7 34.6 34.6 favor 2 342 12.6 37.1 71.8 slightly favor 3 116 4.3 12.6 84.4 slightly oppose 5 31 1.1 3.4 87.7 oppose 6 61 2.2 6.6 94.4 strongly oppose 7 52 1.9 5.6 100.0 . 1227 45.0 Missing not sure 4 577 21.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 921 Missing cases 1804 TERMAM2 Q20 Term limits, Avg voter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 267 9.8 22.0 22.0 favor 2 513 18.8 42.2 64.2 slightly favor 3 323 11.9 26.6 90.8 slightly oppose 5 52 1.9 4.3 95.1 oppose 6 39 1.4 3.2 98.3 strongly oppose 7 21 .8 1.7 100.0 . 1229 45.1 Missing not sure 4 281 10.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1215 Missing cases 1510 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TERMDP2 Q20 Term limits, D Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 54 2.0 5.2 5.2 favor 2 121 4.4 11.6 16.8 slightly favor 3 118 4.3 11.3 28.1 slightly oppose 5 140 5.1 13.4 41.5 oppose 6 370 13.6 35.5 77.0 strongly oppose 7 240 8.8 23.0 100.0 . 1233 45.2 Missing not sure 4 449 16.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1043 Missing cases 1682 TERMRP2 Q20 Term limits, R Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 177 6.5 16.6 16.6 favor 2 261 9.6 24.5 41.1 slightly favor 3 191 7.0 17.9 59.1 slightly oppose 5 133 4.9 12.5 71.5 oppose 6 203 7.4 19.1 90.6 strongly oppose 7 100 3.7 9.4 100.0 . 1226 45.0 Missing not sure 4 434 15.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1065 Missing cases 1660 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ECONGB2 Q21 Able solve econ problems, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 46 1.7 3.0 3.0 above average 2 190 7.0 12.3 15.3 average 3 341 12.5 22.1 37.3 below average 4 250 9.2 16.2 53.5 poor 5 718 26.3 46.5 100.0 . 1162 42.6 Missing not sure 6 18 .7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1545 Missing cases 1180 ECONBC2 Q21 Able solve econ problems, Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 99 3.6 7.3 7.3 above average 2 504 18.5 37.4 44.7 average 3 389 14.3 28.8 73.5 below average 4 156 5.7 11.6 85.1 poor 5 201 7.4 14.9 100.0 . 1152 42.3 Missing not sure 6 224 8.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1349 Missing cases 1376 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ECONHRP2 Q21 Able solve econ problems, Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 103 3.8 8.7 8.7 above average 2 422 15.5 35.5 44.2 average 3 281 10.3 23.7 67.8 below average 4 165 6.1 13.9 81.7 poor 5 217 8.0 18.3 100.0 . 1182 43.4 Missing not sure 6 355 13.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1188 Missing cases 1537 ECONDP2 Q21 Able solve econ problems, D Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 59 2.2 4.2 4.2 above average 2 330 12.1 23.3 27.5 average 3 429 15.7 30.3 57.9 below average 4 224 8.2 15.8 73.7 poor 5 372 13.7 26.3 100.0 . 1200 44.0 Missing not sure 6 111 4.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1414 Missing cases 1311 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ECONRP2 Q21 Able solve econ problems, R Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 34 1.2 2.4 2.4 above average 2 236 8.7 16.7 19.1 average 3 325 11.9 23.0 42.0 below average 4 333 12.2 23.5 65.6 poor 5 487 17.9 34.4 100.0 . 1229 45.1 Missing not sure 6 81 3.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1415 Missing cases 1310 CAREGB2 Q21 Cares about people like you, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 82 3.0 5.5 5.5 above average 2 247 9.1 16.7 22.2 average 3 315 11.6 21.2 43.4 below average 4 213 7.8 14.4 57.8 poor 5 626 23.0 42.2 100.0 . 1179 43.3 Missing not sure 6 63 2.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1483 Missing cases 1242 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CAREBC2 Q21 Cares about people like you, Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 279 10.2 19.1 19.1 above average 2 540 19.8 37.0 56.1 average 3 371 13.6 25.4 81.5 below average 4 111 4.1 7.6 89.0 poor 5 160 5.9 11.0 100.0 . 1150 42.2 Missing not sure 6 114 4.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1461 Missing cases 1264 CAREHRP2 Q21 Cares about people like you, Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 150 5.5 11.7 11.7 above average 2 399 14.6 31.2 42.9 average 3 380 13.9 29.7 72.6 below average 4 158 5.8 12.4 85.0 poor 5 192 7.0 15.0 100.0 . 1196 43.9 Missing not sure 6 250 9.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1279 Missing cases 1446 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CAREDP2 Q21 Cares about people like you, D Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 141 5.2 9.8 9.8 above average 2 450 16.5 31.4 41.2 average 3 443 16.3 30.9 72.2 below average 4 155 5.7 10.8 83.0 poor 5 244 9.0 17.0 100.0 . 1207 44.3 Missing not sure 6 85 3.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1433 Missing cases 1292 CARERP2 Q21 Cares about people like you, R Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 38 1.4 2.7 2.7 above average 2 193 7.1 13.9 16.6 average 3 383 14.1 27.5 44.1 below average 4 260 9.5 18.7 62.7 poor 5 519 19.0 37.3 100.0 . 1239 45.5 Missing not sure 6 93 3.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1393 Missing cases 1332 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TRSTGB2 Q21 Trustworthy, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 211 7.7 13.9 13.9 above average 2 300 11.0 19.8 33.7 average 3 333 12.2 22.0 55.7 below average 4 173 6.3 11.4 67.1 poor 5 498 18.3 32.9 100.0 . 1162 42.6 Missing not sure 6 48 1.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1515 Missing cases 1210 TRSTBC2 Q21 Trustworthy, Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 110 4.0 7.6 7.6 above average 2 327 12.0 22.5 30.1 average 3 478 17.5 32.9 63.0 below average 4 195 7.2 13.4 76.4 poor 5 343 12.6 23.6 100.0 . 1142 41.9 Missing not sure 6 130 4.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1453 Missing cases 1272 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TRSTHRP2 Q21 Trustworthy, Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 91 3.3 7.3 7.3 above average 2 257 9.4 20.7 28.0 average 3 413 15.2 33.2 61.2 below average 4 205 7.5 16.5 77.7 poor 5 277 10.2 22.3 100.0 . 1189 43.6 Missing not sure 6 293 10.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1243 Missing cases 1482 TRSTDP2 Q21 Trustworthy, D Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 59 2.2 4.1 4.1 above average 2 217 8.0 15.2 19.4 average 3 573 21.0 40.2 59.6 below average 4 225 8.3 15.8 75.4 poor 5 350 12.8 24.6 100.0 . 1215 44.6 Missing not sure 6 86 3.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1424 Missing cases 1301 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TRSTRP2 Q21 Trustworthy, R Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 43 1.6 3.1 3.1 above average 2 192 7.0 13.8 16.9 average 3 470 17.2 33.7 50.6 below average 4 295 10.8 21.2 71.8 poor 5 393 14.4 28.2 100.0 . 1248 45.8 Missing not sure 6 84 3.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1393 Missing cases 1332 FORNGB2 Q21 Solve foreign policy problems, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 431 15.8 28.2 28.2 above average 2 526 19.3 34.4 62.6 average 3 361 13.2 23.6 86.2 below average 4 94 3.4 6.1 92.3 poor 5 117 4.3 7.7 100.0 . 1159 42.5 Missing not sure 6 37 1.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1529 Missing cases 1196 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FORNBC2 Q21 Solve foreign policy problems, Clint Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 39 1.4 3.7 3.7 above average 2 182 6.7 17.2 20.9 average 3 416 15.3 39.4 60.3 below average 4 160 5.9 15.1 75.4 poor 5 260 9.5 24.6 100.0 . 1155 42.4 Missing not sure 6 513 18.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1057 Missing cases 1668 FORNHRP2 Q21 Solve foreign policy problems, Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 22 .8 2.3 2.3 above average 2 104 3.8 10.7 12.9 average 3 258 9.5 26.5 39.5 below average 4 251 9.2 25.8 65.3 poor 5 338 12.4 34.7 100.0 . 1192 43.7 Missing not sure 6 560 20.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 973 Missing cases 1752 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FORNDP2 Q21 Solve foreign policy problems, D Par Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 36 1.3 2.7 2.7 above average 2 212 7.8 15.7 18.3 average 3 606 22.2 44.8 63.1 below average 4 207 7.6 15.3 78.4 poor 5 293 10.8 21.6 100.0 . 1207 44.3 Missing not sure 6 164 6.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1354 Missing cases 1371 FORNRP2 Q21 Solve foreign policy problems, R Par Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 124 4.6 9.1 9.1 above average 2 381 14.0 28.0 37.1 average 3 576 21.1 42.3 79.3 below average 4 141 5.2 10.3 89.7 poor 5 141 5.2 10.3 100.0 . 1234 45.3 Missing not sure 6 128 4.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1363 Missing cases 1362 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALGB2 Q21 Overall evaluation, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 115 4.2 7.5 7.5 above average 2 360 13.2 23.3 30.8 average 3 318 11.7 20.6 51.4 below average 4 242 8.9 15.7 67.1 poor 5 508 18.6 32.9 100.0 . 1168 42.9 Missing not sure 6 14 .5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1543 Missing cases 1182 EVALBC2 Q21 Overall evaluation, Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 137 5.0 9.6 9.6 above average 2 496 18.2 34.6 44.2 average 3 367 13.5 25.6 69.8 below average 4 182 6.7 12.7 82.5 poor 5 251 9.2 17.5 100.0 . 1153 42.3 Missing not sure 6 139 5.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1433 Missing cases 1292 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALHRP2 Q21 Overall evaluation, Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 43 1.6 3.5 3.5 above average 2 233 8.6 19.0 22.5 average 3 393 14.4 32.0 54.4 below average 4 269 9.9 21.9 76.3 poor 5 291 10.7 23.7 100.0 . 1192 43.7 Missing not sure 6 304 11.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1229 Missing cases 1496 EVALAG2 Q21 Overall evaluation, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 145 5.3 10.5 10.5 above average 2 476 17.5 34.3 44.8 average 3 363 13.3 26.2 71.0 below average 4 148 5.4 10.7 81.7 poor 5 254 9.3 18.3 100.0 . 1210 44.4 Missing not sure 6 129 4.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1386 Missing cases 1339 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALDQ2 Q21 Overall evaluation, Quayle Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 63 2.3 4.3 4.3 above average 2 235 8.6 16.2 20.6 average 3 305 11.2 21.0 41.6 below average 4 219 8.0 15.1 56.7 poor 5 627 23.0 43.3 100.0 . 1197 43.9 Missing not sure 6 79 2.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1449 Missing cases 1276 EVALJS2 Q21 Overall evaluation, Stockdale Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 8 .3 .9 .9 above average 2 70 2.6 7.5 8.4 average 3 189 6.9 20.3 28.7 below average 4 191 7.0 20.6 49.3 poor 5 471 17.3 50.7 100.0 . 1232 45.2 Missing not sure 6 564 20.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 929 Missing cases 1796 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALPB2 Q21 Overall evaluation, Buchanan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 15 .6 1.2 1.2 above average 2 89 3.3 7.1 8.3 average 3 186 6.8 14.8 23.1 below average 4 188 6.9 15.0 38.0 poor 5 779 28.6 62.0 100.0 . 1245 45.7 Missing not sure 6 223 8.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1257 Missing cases 1468 EVALJJ2 Q21 Overall evaluation, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 37 1.4 2.7 2.7 above average 2 157 5.8 11.7 14.4 average 3 297 10.9 22.1 36.5 below average 4 201 7.4 14.9 51.4 poor 5 654 24.0 48.6 100.0 . 1226 45.0 Missing not sure 6 153 5.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1346 Missing cases 1379 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALRR2 Q21 Overall evaluation, Reagan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 163 6.0 11.5 11.5 above average 2 277 10.2 19.5 30.9 average 3 225 8.3 15.8 46.8 below average 4 185 6.8 13.0 59.8 poor 5 572 21.0 40.2 100.0 . 1253 46.0 Missing not sure 6 50 1.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1422 Missing cases 1303 EVALDH2 Q21 Overall evaluation, D Hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 101 3.7 7.9 7.9 above average 2 301 11.0 23.6 31.5 average 3 436 16.0 34.2 65.7 below average 4 151 5.5 11.8 77.6 poor 5 286 10.5 22.4 100.0 . 1326 48.7 Missing not sure 6 124 4.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1275 Missing cases 1450 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALRH2 Q21 Overall evaluation, R Hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 117 4.3 9.5 9.5 above average 2 291 10.7 23.7 33.3 average 3 374 13.7 30.5 63.8 below average 4 159 5.8 13.0 76.8 poor 5 285 10.5 23.2 100.0 . 1329 48.8 Missing not sure 6 170 6.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1226 Missing cases 1499 EVALDP2 Q21 Overall evaluation, D Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 67 2.5 4.5 4.5 above average 2 316 11.6 21.3 25.8 average 3 545 20.0 36.8 62.6 below average 4 215 7.9 14.5 77.1 poor 5 339 12.4 22.9 100.0 . 1192 43.7 Missing not sure 6 51 1.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1482 Missing cases 1243 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALRP2 Q21 Overall evaluation, R Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 41 1.5 2.8 2.8 above average 2 256 9.4 17.5 20.3 average 3 474 17.4 32.5 52.8 below average 4 309 11.3 21.2 74.0 poor 5 380 13.9 26.0 100.0 . 1214 44.6 Missing not sure 6 51 1.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1460 Missing cases 1265 EVALCNG2 Q21 Overall evaluation, US Congress Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 11 .4 .8 .8 above average 2 85 3.1 5.8 6.6 average 3 520 19.1 35.6 42.2 below average 4 385 14.1 26.4 68.6 poor 5 458 16.8 31.4 100.0 . 1217 44.7 Missing not sure 6 49 1.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1459 Missing cases 1266 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALSC2 Q21 Overall evaluation, Supreme Court Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 24 .9 1.7 1.7 above average 2 225 8.3 15.6 17.3 average 3 550 20.2 38.2 55.6 below average 4 353 13.0 24.5 80.1 poor 5 286 10.5 19.9 100.0 . 1210 44.4 Missing not sure 6 77 2.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1438 Missing cases 1287 EVALBUS2 Q21 Overall evaluation, Business Corp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 11 .4 .8 .8 above average 2 163 6.0 11.7 12.5 average 3 564 20.7 40.4 52.9 below average 4 323 11.9 23.1 76.0 poor 5 335 12.3 24.0 100.0 . 1215 44.6 Missing not sure 6 114 4.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1396 Missing cases 1329 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALMIL2 Q21 Overall evaluation, US military Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 156 5.7 10.9 10.9 above average 2 493 18.1 34.3 45.2 average 3 506 18.6 35.2 80.4 below average 4 157 5.8 10.9 91.3 poor 5 125 4.6 8.7 100.0 . 1208 44.3 Missing not sure 6 80 2.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1437 Missing cases 1288 PNECON2 Q22 Nations economy, past 12 months Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent much worse 1 315 11.6 20.4 20.4 somewhat worse 2 554 20.3 35.9 56.3 stayed the same 3 366 13.4 23.7 80.0 somewhat better 4 281 10.3 18.2 98.2 much better 5 28 1.0 1.8 100.0 . 1181 43.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1544 Missing cases 1181 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FNECON2 Q22 Nations economy, next 12 months Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent much worse 1 59 2.2 3.9 3.9 somewhat worse 2 185 6.8 12.3 16.3 stayed the same 3 330 12.1 22.0 38.2 somewhat better 4 854 31.3 56.9 95.1 much better 5 73 2.7 4.9 100.0 . 1224 44.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1501 Missing cases 1224 PPECON2 Q22 Family financial, past 12 months Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent much worse 1 124 4.6 8.0 8.0 somewhat worse 2 396 14.5 25.7 33.7 stayed the same 3 713 26.2 46.2 80.0 somewhat better 4 253 9.3 16.4 96.4 much better 5 56 2.1 3.6 100.0 . 1183 43.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1542 Missing cases 1183 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FPECON2 Q22 Family financial, next 12 months Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent much worse 1 43 1.6 2.8 2.8 somewhat worse 2 218 8.0 14.4 17.3 stayed the same 3 686 25.2 45.5 62.8 somewhat better 4 503 18.5 33.3 96.1 much better 5 59 2.2 3.9 100.0 . 1216 44.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1509 Missing cases 1216 WIFE2 Q23a Cant be good wife/mother & hold off Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly disagree 1 370 13.6 26.4 26.4 disagree 2 661 24.3 47.2 73.6 agree 4 281 10.3 20.1 93.6 strongly agree 5 89 3.3 6.4 100.0 . 1150 42.2 Missing not sure 3 174 6.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1401 Missing cases 1324 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MEN2 Q23b Men better, emotionally, than women Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly disagree 1 510 18.7 35.9 35.9 disagree 2 586 21.5 41.2 77.1 agree 4 279 10.2 19.6 96.8 strongly agree 5 46 1.7 3.2 100.0 . 1148 42.1 Missing not sure 3 156 5.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1421 Missing cases 1304 DIVGVT2 Q23c Diff parties control Congres/Pres Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly disagree 1 200 7.3 15.7 15.7 disagree 2 594 21.8 46.6 62.3 agree 4 372 13.7 29.2 91.5 strongly agree 5 109 4.0 8.5 100.0 . 1158 42.5 Missing not sure 3 292 10.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1275 Missing cases 1450 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BETJOB2 Q23d I could do better in offc than most Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly disagree 1 125 4.6 12.1 12.1 disagree 2 341 12.5 33.1 45.2 agree 4 434 15.9 42.1 87.4 strongly agree 5 130 4.8 12.6 100.0 . 1169 42.9 Missing not sure 3 526 19.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1030 Missing cases 1695 RIDPTY2 Q23e Get rid of parties Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly disagree 1 513 18.8 40.7 40.7 disagree 2 585 21.5 46.4 87.1 agree 4 96 3.5 7.6 94.8 strongly agree 5 66 2.4 5.2 100.0 . 1156 42.4 Missing not sure 3 309 11.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1260 Missing cases 1465 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PTYCONF2 Q23f Parties confuse issues/no choice Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly disagree 1 194 7.1 14.2 14.2 disagree 2 607 22.3 44.3 58.4 agree 4 449 16.5 32.7 91.2 strongly agree 5 121 4.4 8.8 100.0 . 1160 42.6 Missing not sure 3 194 7.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1371 Missing cases 1354 HUSB2 Q23g Cant be good husband/father & hold Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly disagree 1 436 16.0 30.9 30.9 disagree 2 790 29.0 55.9 86.8 agree 4 153 5.6 10.8 97.7 strongly agree 5 33 1.2 2.3 100.0 . 1151 42.2 Missing not sure 3 162 5.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1412 Missing cases 1313 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TEACH2 Q24 Teacher organization Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent never a member 1 1198 44.0 78.0 78.0 formerly a member 2 190 7.0 12.4 90.4 currently a member 3 92 3.4 6.0 96.4 currently active or 4 55 2.0 3.6 100.0 . 1190 43.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1535 Missing cases 1190 BUSORG2 Q24 Business organization Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent never a member 1 1054 38.7 70.3 70.3 formerly a member 2 223 8.2 14.9 85.2 currently a member 3 149 5.5 9.9 95.1 currently active or 4 73 2.7 4.9 100.0 . 1226 45.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1499 Missing cases 1226 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - VET2 Q24 Veterans groups Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent never a member 1 1101 40.4 74.0 74.0 formerly a member 2 95 3.5 6.4 80.4 currently a member 3 220 8.1 14.8 95.2 currently active or 4 71 2.6 4.8 100.0 . 1238 45.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1487 Missing cases 1238 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WOMEN2 Q18 Womens rights groups Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent never a member 1 1330 48.8 88.6 88.6 formerly a member 2 86 3.2 5.7 94.3 currently a member 3 65 2.4 4.3 98.7 currently active or 4 20 .7 1.3 100.0 . 1224 44.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1501 Missing cases 1224 CIVILR2 Q24 Civil rights groups Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent never a member 1 1288 47.3 85.4 85.4 formerly a member 2 99 3.6 6.6 92.0 currently a member 3 98 3.6 6.5 98.5 currently active or 4 23 .8 1.5 100.0 . 1217 44.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1508 Missing cases 1217 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ENVIR2 Q24 Environmental groups Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent never a member 1 1164 42.7 77.9 77.9 formerly a member 2 122 4.5 8.2 86.1 currently a member 3 177 6.5 11.8 97.9 currently active or 4 31 1.1 2.1 100.0 . 1231 45.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1494 Missing cases 1231 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NONPRT2 Q24 Non-partisan interest groups Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent never a member 1 1131 41.5 75.4 75.4 formerly a member 2 203 7.4 13.5 88.9 currently a member 3 120 4.4 8.0 96.9 currently active or 4 46 1.7 3.1 100.0 . 1225 45.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1500 Missing cases 1225 LABOR2 Q24 Labor union Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent never a member 1 1102 40.4 73.1 73.1 formerly a member 2 266 9.8 17.6 90.7 currently a member 3 85 3.1 5.6 96.4 currently active or 4 55 2.0 3.6 100.0 . 1217 44.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1508 Missing cases 1217 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FARM2 Q24 Farm organization Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent never a member 1 1130 41.5 78.0 78.0 formerly a member 2 142 5.2 9.8 87.8 currently a member 3 133 4.9 9.2 97.0 currently active or 4 44 1.6 3.0 100.0 . 1276 46.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1449 Missing cases 1276 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVAN2 Q24 Evangelical group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent never a member 1 1411 51.8 95.0 95.0 formerly a member 2 34 1.2 2.3 97.2 currently a member 3 34 1.2 2.3 99.5 currently active or 4 7 .3 .5 100.0 . 1239 45.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1486 Missing cases 1239 ANTIAB2 Q24 Anti-abortion group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent never a member 1 1352 49.6 90.6 90.6 formerly a member 2 45 1.7 3.0 93.6 currently a member 3 74 2.7 5.0 98.5 currently active or 4 22 .8 1.5 100.0 . 1232 45.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1493 Missing cases 1232 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LIBID2 Q24 Liberal ideol group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent never a member 1 1364 50.1 91.5 91.5 formerly a member 2 63 2.3 4.2 95.8 currently a member 3 48 1.8 3.2 99.0 currently active or 4 15 .6 1.0 100.0 . 1235 45.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1490 Missing cases 1235 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONID2 Q24 Conservative ideological group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent never a member 1 1375 50.5 91.7 91.7 formerly a member 2 58 2.1 3.9 95.6 currently a member 3 47 1.7 3.1 98.7 currently active or 4 19 .7 1.3 100.0 . 1226 45.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1499 Missing cases 1226 TCHNEV2 Q25 Teachers org, never active Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1505 55.2 55.2 55.2 CHECKED 1 1220 44.8 44.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TCHOLD2 Q25 Teachers org, not active in last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2614 95.9 95.9 95.9 CHECKED 1 111 4.1 4.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TCHPRO2 Q25 Teachers org, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2708 99.4 99.4 99.4 CHECKED 1 17 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 TCHFRD2 Q25 Teachers org, tried convince others Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2681 98.4 98.4 98.4 CHECKED 1 44 1.6 1.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TCHPD2 Q25 Teachers org, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2593 95.2 95.2 95.2 CHECKED 1 132 4.8 4.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TCHATT2 Q25 Teachers org, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2634 96.7 96.7 96.7 CHECKED 1 91 3.3 3.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 BUSNEV2 Q25 Business org, never active Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1665 61.1 61.1 61.1 CHECKED 1 1060 38.9 38.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BUSOLD2 Q25 Business org, not active in last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2574 94.5 94.5 94.5 CHECKED 1 151 5.5 5.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BUSPRO2 Q25 Business org, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2724 100.0 100.0 100.0 CHECKED 1 1 .0 .0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 BUSFRD2 Q25 Business org, tried convince others Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2668 97.9 97.9 97.9 CHECKED 1 57 2.1 2.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BUSPD2 Q25 Business org, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2532 92.9 92.9 92.9 CHECKED 1 193 7.1 7.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BUSATT2 Q25 Business org, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2563 94.1 94.1 94.1 CHECKED 1 162 5.9 5.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 VETNEV2 Q25 Veterans groups, never active Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1595 58.5 58.5 58.5 CHECKED 1 1130 41.5 41.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - VETOLD2 Q25 Veterans groups, not active in last Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2635 96.7 96.7 96.7 CHECKED 1 90 3.3 3.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - VETPRO2 Q25 Veterans groups, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2718 99.7 99.7 99.7 CHECKED 1 7 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 VETFRD2 Q25 Veterans groups, tried convince othe Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2685 98.5 98.5 98.5 CHECKED 1 40 1.5 1.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - VETPD2 Q25 Veterans groups, paid membership due Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2549 93.5 93.5 93.5 CHECKED 1 176 6.5 6.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - VETATT2 Q25 Veterans groups, attend group meetin Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2621 96.2 96.2 96.2 CHECKED 1 104 3.8 3.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 WOMNEV2 Q25 Womens rights, never active Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1435 52.7 52.7 52.7 CHECKED 1 1290 47.3 47.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WOMOLD2 Q25 Womens rights, not active in last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2674 98.1 98.1 98.1 CHECKED 1 51 1.9 1.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WOMPRO2 Q25 Womens rights, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2693 98.8 98.8 98.8 CHECKED 1 32 1.2 1.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 WOMFRD2 Q25 Womens rights, tried convince others Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2691 98.8 98.8 98.8 CHECKED 1 34 1.2 1.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WOMPD2 Q25 Womens rights, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2654 97.4 97.4 97.4 CHECKED 1 71 2.6 2.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WOMATT2 Q25 Womens rights, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2679 98.3 98.3 98.3 CHECKED 1 46 1.7 1.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 CIVNEV2 Q25 Civil rights, never active Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1470 53.9 53.9 53.9 CHECKED 1 1255 46.1 46.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CIVOLD2 Q25 Civil rights, not active in last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2652 97.3 97.3 97.3 CHECKED 1 73 2.7 2.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CIVPRO2 Q25 Civil rights, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2710 99.4 99.4 99.4 CHECKED 1 15 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 CIVFRD2 Q25 Civil rights, tried convince others Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2701 99.1 99.1 99.1 CHECKED 1 24 .9 .9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CIVPD2 Q25 Civil rights, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2623 96.3 96.3 96.3 CHECKED 1 102 3.7 3.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CIVATT2 Q25 Civil rights, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2670 98.0 98.0 98.0 CHECKED 1 55 2.0 2.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 ENVNEV2 Q25 Enviro groups, never active Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1557 57.1 57.1 57.1 CHECKED 1 1168 42.9 42.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ENVOLD2 Q25 Enviro groups, not active in last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2653 97.4 97.4 97.4 CHECKED 1 72 2.6 2.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ENVPRO2 Q25 Enviro groups, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2710 99.4 99.4 99.4 CHECKED 1 15 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 ENVFRD2 Q25 Enviro groups, tried convince others Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2695 98.9 98.9 98.9 CHECKED 1 30 1.1 1.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ENVPD2 Q25 Enviro groups, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2550 93.6 93.6 93.6 CHECKED 1 175 6.4 6.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ENVATT2 Q25 Enviro groups, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2669 97.9 97.9 97.9 CHECKED 1 56 2.1 2.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 INTNEV2 Q25 Non-partisan, never active Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1566 57.5 57.5 57.5 CHECKED 1 1159 42.5 42.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INTOLD2 Q25 Non-partisan, not active in last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2594 95.2 95.2 95.2 CHECKED 1 131 4.8 4.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INTPRO2 Q25 Non-partisan, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2712 99.5 99.5 99.5 CHECKED 1 13 .5 .5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 INTFRD2 Q25 Non-partisan, tried convince others Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2697 99.0 99.0 99.0 CHECKED 1 28 1.0 1.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INTPD2 Q25 Non-partisan, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2595 95.2 95.2 95.2 CHECKED 1 130 4.8 4.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INTATT2 Q25 Non-partisan, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2650 97.2 97.2 97.2 CHECKED 1 75 2.8 2.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 LABNEV2 Q25 Labor union, never active Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1546 56.7 56.7 56.7 CHECKED 1 1179 43.3 43.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LABOLD2 Q25 Labor union, not active in last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2595 95.2 95.2 95.2 CHECKED 1 130 4.8 4.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LABPRO2 Q25 Labor union, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2695 98.9 98.9 98.9 CHECKED 1 30 1.1 1.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 LABFRD2 Q25 Labor union, tried convince others Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2682 98.4 98.4 98.4 CHECKED 1 43 1.6 1.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LABPD2 Q25 Labor union, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2599 95.4 95.4 95.4 CHECKED 1 126 4.6 4.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LABATT2 Q25 Labor union, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2641 96.9 96.9 96.9 CHECKED 1 84 3.1 3.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 FRMNEV2 Q25 Farm org, never active Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1563 57.4 57.4 57.4 CHECKED 1 1162 42.6 42.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FRMOLD2 Q25 Farm org, active but not in last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2615 96.0 96.0 96.0 CHECKED 1 110 4.0 4.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FRMPRO2 Q25 Farm org, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2719 99.8 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 6 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 FRMFRD2 Q25 Farm org, tried convince others Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2698 99.0 99.0 99.0 CHECKED 1 27 1.0 1.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FRMPD2 Q25 Farm org, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2589 95.0 95.0 95.0 CHECKED 1 136 5.0 5.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FRMATT2 Q25 Farm org, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2645 97.1 97.1 97.1 CHECKED 1 80 2.9 2.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 JESNEV2 Q25 Evangelical group, never active Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1345 49.4 49.4 49.4 CHECKED 1 1380 50.6 50.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - JESOLD2 Q25 Evangelical group, not active in las Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2702 99.2 99.2 99.2 CHECKED 1 23 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - JESPRO2 Q25 Evangelical group, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2718 99.7 99.7 99.7 CHECKED 1 7 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 JESFRD2 Q25 Evangelical group, tried convince ot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2715 99.6 99.6 99.6 CHECKED 1 10 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - JESPD2 Q25 Evangelical group, paid membership d Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2696 98.9 98.9 98.9 CHECKED 1 29 1.1 1.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - JESATT2 Q25 Evangelical group, attend group meet Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2703 99.2 99.2 99.2 CHECKED 1 22 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 ABNEV2 Q25 Anti-abortion, never active Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1422 52.2 52.2 52.2 CHECKED 1 1303 47.8 47.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABOLD2 Q25 Anti-abortion, not active in last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2686 98.6 98.6 98.6 CHECKED 1 39 1.4 1.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABPRO2 Q25 Anti-abortion, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2700 99.1 99.1 99.1 CHECKED 1 25 .9 .9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 ABFRD2 Q25 Anti-abortion, tried convince others Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2700 99.1 99.1 99.1 CHECKED 1 25 .9 .9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABPD2 Q25 Anti-abortion, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2655 97.4 97.4 97.4 CHECKED 1 70 2.6 2.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABATT2 Q25 Anti-abortion, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2687 98.6 98.6 98.6 CHECKED 1 38 1.4 1.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 LIBNEV2 Q25 Liberal ideol, never active Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1402 51.4 51.4 51.4 CHECKED 1 1323 48.6 48.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LIBOLD2 Q25 Liberal ideol, not active in last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2680 98.3 98.3 98.3 CHECKED 1 45 1.7 1.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LIBPRO2 Q25 Liberal ideol, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2713 99.6 99.6 99.6 CHECKED 1 12 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 LIBFRD2 Q25 Liberal ideol, tried convince others Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2710 99.4 99.4 99.4 CHECKED 1 15 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LIBPD2 Q25 Liberal ideol, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2679 98.3 98.3 98.3 CHECKED 1 46 1.7 1.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LIBATT2 Q25 Liberal ideol, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2696 98.9 98.9 98.9 CHECKED 1 29 1.1 1.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 CONNEV2 Q25 Cons ideol, never active Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1412 51.8 51.8 51.8 CHECKED 1 1313 48.2 48.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONOLD2 Q25 Cons ideol, not active in last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2677 98.2 98.2 98.2 CHECKED 1 48 1.8 1.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONPRO2 Q25 Cons ideol, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2718 99.7 99.7 99.7 CHECKED 1 7 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 CONFRD2 Q25 Cons ideol, tried convince others Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2697 99.0 99.0 99.0 CHECKED 1 28 1.0 1.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONPD2 Q25 Cons ideol, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2672 98.1 98.1 98.1 CHECKED 1 53 1.9 1.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONATT2 Q25 Cons ideol, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2686 98.6 98.6 98.6 CHECKED 1 39 1.4 1.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 AGE2 Q26 What is your age Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 17-24 1 1 .0 .1 .1 25-29 2 23 .8 1.4 1.5 30-39 3 99 3.6 6.1 7.6 40-49 4 249 9.1 15.4 23.0 50-59 5 352 12.9 21.8 44.8 60-64 6 221 8.1 13.7 58.5 65 and older 7 670 24.6 41.5 100.0 . 1110 40.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1615 Missing cases 1110 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SEX2 Q27 What is your sex Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent male 1 848 31.1 52.5 52.5 female 2 768 28.2 47.5 100.0 . 1109 40.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1616 Missing cases 1109 HOWREL2 Q28 How religious do you consider yourse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent very religious 1 342 12.6 21.5 21.5 fairly religious 2 918 33.7 57.6 79.0 not very religious 3 227 8.3 14.2 93.3 not religious at all 4 107 3.9 6.7 100.0 . 1116 41.0 Missing not sure 5 15 .6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1594 Missing cases 1131 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INCOME2 Q29 Approximate family income last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent under 9999 1 71 2.6 4.5 4.5 10000-19999 2 209 7.7 13.4 17.9 20000-29999 3 243 8.9 15.6 33.5 30000-39999 4 245 9.0 15.7 49.2 40000-49999 5 219 8.0 14.0 63.2 50000-59999 6 149 5.5 9.5 72.7 60000-69999 7 102 3.7 6.5 79.3 70000-79999 8 103 3.8 6.6 85.9 80000-89999 9 56 2.1 3.6 89.4 90000-99999 10 48 1.8 3.1 92.5 over 100000 11 117 4.3 7.5 100.0 . 1163 42.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1562 Missing cases 1163 CHILD2 Q30 Children under 12 yrs at home Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 142 5.2 8.9 8.9 no 2 1456 53.4 91.1 100.0 . 1127 41.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1598 Missing cases 1127 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SCHOOL2 Q31 How much formal schooling completed Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0-8 1 38 1.4 2.4 2.4 9-11 2 51 1.9 3.3 5.7 12 3 345 12.7 22.0 27.7 13-15 4 358 13.1 22.8 50.5 college graduate 5 381 14.0 24.3 74.9 graduate school 6 394 14.5 25.1 100.0 . 1158 42.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1567 Missing cases 1158 RACE2 Q32 What is your race Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent white 1 1497 54.9 93.3 93.3 black 2 90 3.3 5.6 98.9 hispanic 3 3 .1 .2 99.1 native american 4 3 .1 .2 99.3 asian american 5 4 .1 .2 99.6 other 6 7 .3 .4 100.0 . 1121 41.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1604 Missing cases 1121 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - REL2 Q33 What is your religious preference Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent catholic 1 303 11.1 19.6 19.6 jewish 2 19 .7 1.2 20.8 protestant 3 1045 38.3 67.6 88.5 no religious prefere 4 117 4.3 7.6 96.1 other 5 61 2.2 3.9 100.0 . 1180 43.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1545 Missing cases 1180 MILDUTY2 Q34 Served active military duty-at least Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 454 16.7 29.3 29.3 no 2 1095 40.2 70.7 100.0 . 1176 43.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1549 Missing cases 1176 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONTH2 Q35 month Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 3 .1 .2 .2 1 22 .8 1.4 1.6 2 6 .2 .4 2.0 3 1 .0 .1 2.1 6 1 .0 .1 2.2 10 8 .3 .5 2.7 11 1264 46.4 82.4 85.1 12 228 8.4 14.9 99.9 14 1 .0 .1 100.0 . 1191 43.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1534 Missing cases 1191 DAY2 Q35 day Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 1 .0 .1 .1 1 11 .4 .7 .8 2 11 .4 .7 1.5 3 8 .3 .5 2.0 4 3 .1 .2 2.2 5 3 .1 .2 2.4 6 18 .7 1.2 3.6 7 218 8.0 14.3 17.9 8 116 4.3 7.6 25.5 9 238 8.7 15.6 41.2 10 120 4.4 7.9 49.0 11 63 2.3 4.1 53.2 12 94 3.4 6.2 59.4 13 58 2.1 3.8 63.2 14 85 3.1 5.6 68.7 15 63 2.3 4.1 72.9 16 84 3.1 5.5 78.4 17 63 2.3 4.1 82.5 18 55 2.0 3.6 86.1 19 57 2.1 3.7 89.9 20 18 .7 1.2 91.1 21 29 1.1 1.9 93.0 22 21 .8 1.4 94.4 23 17 .6 1.1 95.5 24 16 .6 1.1 96.5 25 13 .5 .9 97.4 26 5 .2 .3 97.7 27 10 .4 .7 98.4 28 2 .1 .1 98.5 29 7 .3 .5 98.9 30 10 .4 .7 99.6 31 6 .2 .4 100.0 . 1202 44.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1523 Missing cases 1202 RSPN92 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO .00 1085 39.8 39.8 39.8 YES 1.00 1640 60.2 60.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 *1994* INT94 Q1 Interest in Hse campaign this year Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY INTERESTED 1 1042 38.2 67.9 67.9 2 343 12.6 22.4 90.3 3 109 4.0 7.1 97.4 NOT AT ALL INTERESTE 4 40 1.5 2.6 100.0 . 1191 43.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1534 Missing cases 1191 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HSEVOT94 Q2 Vote in the Hse race in your district Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE 1 739 27.1 48.3 48.3 REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE 2 704 25.8 46.0 94.3 INDEPENDENT/OTHER 3 25 .9 1.6 95.9 DID NOT VOTE 4 62 2.3 4.1 100.0 . 1195 43.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1530 Missing cases 1195 VOTE9294 Q3 Vote in the 1992 presidential electio Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent GEORGE BUSH 1 631 23.2 41.1 41.1 BILL CLINTON 2 800 29.4 52.1 93.2 H. ROSS PEROT 3 81 3.0 5.3 98.5 OTHER 4 16 .6 1.0 99.5 DID NOT VOTE 5 7 .3 .5 100.0 . 1190 43.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1535 Missing cases 1190 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - APPBC94 Q4 Approve/disapprove of Clinton handlin Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent APPROVE STRONGLY 1 180 6.6 12.1 12.1 2 469 17.2 31.5 43.6 3 172 6.3 11.5 55.1 4 299 11.0 20.1 75.2 DISAPPROVE STRONGLY 5 370 13.6 24.8 100.0 . 1194 43.8 Missing NOT SURE 6 41 1.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1490 Missing cases 1235 PTYID94 Q5 Party affiliation Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONG DEMOCRAT 1 416 15.3 27.4 27.4 WEAK DEMOCRAT 2 232 8.5 15.3 42.6 LEANING DEMOCRAT 3 127 4.7 8.3 51.0 INDEPENDENT 4 51 1.9 3.4 54.3 LEANING REPUBLICAN 5 90 3.3 5.9 60.2 WEAK REPUBLICAN 6 161 5.9 10.6 70.8 STRONG REPUBLICAN 7 444 16.3 29.2 100.0 . 1197 43.9 Missing OTHER 8 7 .3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1521 Missing cases 1204 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ALWAYS94 Q6 Characterize self as someone who Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent INVOLVED IN YEAR AFT 1 1129 41.4 74.8 74.8 INVOLVED ONLY WHEN T 2 381 14.0 25.2 100.0 . 1215 44.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1510 Missing cases 1215 TRUST94 Q7 Trust govt in DC to do right Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent JUST ABOUT ALWAYS 1 26 1.0 1.7 1.7 MOST OF THE TIME 2 378 13.9 24.7 26.4 ONLY SOME OF THE TIM 3 941 34.5 61.6 88.0 ALMOST NEVER 4 183 6.7 12.0 100.0 . 1197 43.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1528 Missing cases 1197 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LIBCON94 Q8 Political philosophy Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 40 1.5 2.6 2.6 LIBERAL 2 254 9.3 16.8 19.5 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 209 7.7 13.8 33.3 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 256 9.4 17.0 50.3 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 204 7.5 13.5 63.8 CONSERVATIVE 6 467 17.1 30.9 94.7 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 62 2.3 4.1 98.8 9 18 .7 1.2 100.0 . 1197 43.9 Missing NOT SURE 8 18 .7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1510 Missing cases 1215 CMHSED94 Q9 Active in Dem hse campaign Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY ACTIVE 1 91 3.3 9.1 9.1 2 280 10.3 27.9 36.9 3 232 8.5 23.1 60.0 NOT ACTIVE AT ALL 4 402 14.8 40.0 100.0 . 1720 63.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1005 Missing cases 1720 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CMHSER94 Q9 Active in Rep hse campaign Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY ACTIVE 1 127 4.7 12.4 12.4 2 280 10.3 27.3 39.6 3 227 8.3 22.1 61.7 NOT ACTIVE AT ALL 4 393 14.4 38.3 100.0 . 1698 62.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1027 Missing cases 1698 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CMHSEI94 Q9 Active in Ind hse campaign Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY ACTIVE 1 2 .1 .4 .4 2 12 .4 2.6 3.0 3 32 1.2 6.9 9.9 NOT ACTIVE AT ALL 4 421 15.4 90.1 100.0 . 2258 82.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 467 Missing cases 2258 DHNOM94 Q10 Vote for party hse nomination, Dem Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VOTED FOR THE NOMINA 1 390 14.3 49.2 49.2 VOTED FOR ANOTHER CA 2 62 2.3 7.8 57.1 DID NOT VOTE 3 158 5.8 19.9 77.0 NO NOMINATION CONTES 4 182 6.7 23.0 100.0 . 1933 70.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 792 Missing cases 1933 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RHNOM94 Q10 Vote for party hse nomination, Rep Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VOTED FOR THE NOMINA 1 404 14.8 52.4 52.4 VOTED FOR ANOTHER CA 2 65 2.4 8.4 60.8 DID NOT VOTE 3 150 5.5 19.5 80.3 NO NOMINATION CONTES 4 152 5.6 19.7 100.0 . 1954 71.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 771 Missing cases 1954 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FMEMR94 Q11 Formerly member local party, Rep Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2438 89.5 89.5 89.5 CHECKED 1 287 10.5 10.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 CMEMR94 Q11 Currently member local party, Rep Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2611 95.8 95.8 95.8 CHECKED 1 114 4.2 4.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FMEMD94 Q11 Formerly member local party, Dem Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2590 95.0 95.0 95.0 CHECKED 1 135 5.0 5.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CMEMD94 Q11 Currently member local party, Dem Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2611 95.8 95.8 95.8 CHECKED 1 114 4.2 4.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 FCHRR94 Q11 Formerly chair local party, Rep Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2676 98.2 98.2 98.2 CHECKED 1 49 1.8 1.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CCHRR94 Q11 Currently chair local party, Rep Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2494 91.5 91.5 91.5 CHECKED 1 231 8.5 8.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FCHRD94 Q11 Formerly chair local party, Dem Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2686 98.6 98.6 98.6 CHECKED 1 39 1.4 1.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 CCHRD94 Q11 Currently chair local party, Dem Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2679 98.3 98.3 98.3 CHECKED 1 46 1.7 1.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FLCLR94 Q11 Formerly other local party, Rep Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2679 98.3 98.3 98.3 CHECKED 1 46 1.7 1.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLCLR94 Q11 Currently other local party, Rep Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2705 99.3 99.3 99.3 CHECKED 1 20 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 FLCLD94 Q11 Formerly other local party, Dem Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2533 93.0 93.0 93.0 CHECKED 1 192 7.0 7.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLCLD94 Q11 Currently other local party, Dem Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2686 98.6 98.6 98.6 CHECKED 1 39 1.4 1.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FCDR94 Q11 Formerly cong dist party, Rep Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2666 97.8 97.8 97.8 CHECKED 1 59 2.2 2.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 CCDR94 Q11 Currently cong dist party, Rep Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2687 98.6 98.6 98.6 CHECKED 1 38 1.4 1.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FCDD94 Q11 Formerly cong dist party, Dem Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2704 99.2 99.2 99.2 CHECKED 1 21 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CCDD94 Q11 Currently cong dist party, Dem Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2595 95.2 95.2 95.2 CHECKED 1 130 4.8 4.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 FCCR94 Q11 Formerly state central comm, Rep Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2715 99.6 99.6 99.6 CHECKED 1 10 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CCCR94 Q11 Currently state central comm, Rep Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2701 99.1 99.1 99.1 CHECKED 1 24 .9 .9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FCCD94 Q11 Formerly state central comm, Dem Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2703 99.2 99.2 99.2 CHECKED 1 22 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 CCCD94 Q11 Currenty state central comm, Dem Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2716 99.7 99.7 99.7 CHECKED 1 9 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVDH94 Q12 Canvassing, Dem House Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2638 96.8 96.8 96.8 CHECKED 1 87 3.2 3.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLRKDH94 Q12 Clerical/office, Dem House Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2691 98.8 98.8 98.8 CHECKED 1 34 1.2 1.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 CONVDH94 Q12 Tried to convince friemds, Dem House Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2343 86.0 86.0 86.0 CHECKED 1 382 14.0 14.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONDH94 Q12 Contributed money, Dem House Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2457 90.2 90.2 90.2 CHECKED 1 268 9.8 9.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OTHRDH94 Q12 Other activity, Dem House Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2595 95.2 95.2 95.2 CHECKED 1 130 4.8 4.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 CANVRH94 Q12 Canvassing, Rep House Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2620 96.1 96.1 96.1 CHECKED 1 105 3.9 3.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLRKRH94 Q12 Clerical/office, Rep House Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2667 97.9 97.9 97.9 CHECKED 1 58 2.1 2.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVRH94 Q12 Tried to convince friends, Rep House Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2341 85.9 85.9 85.9 CHECKED 1 384 14.1 14.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 MONRH94 Q12 Contributed money, Rep House Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2387 87.6 87.6 87.6 CHECKED 1 338 12.4 12.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OTHRRH94 Q12 Other activity, Rep House Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2557 93.8 93.8 93.8 CHECKED 1 168 6.2 6.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVIH94 Q12 Canvassing, Ind House Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2723 99.9 99.9 99.9 CHECKED 1 2 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 CLRKIH94 Q12 Clerical/office, Ind House Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2724 100.0 100.0 100.0 CHECKED 1 1 .0 .0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVIH94 Q12 Tried to convince friends, Ind House Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2716 99.7 99.7 99.7 CHECKED 1 9 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONIH94 Q12 Contributed money, Ind House Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2722 99.9 99.9 99.9 CHECKED 1 3 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 OTHRIH94 Q12 Other activity, Ind House Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2721 99.9 99.9 99.9 CHECKED 1 4 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SENGUB94 Q13 A Sen or gub race in state Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 1369 50.2 96.5 96.5 NO 2 50 1.8 3.5 100.0 . 1306 47.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1419 Missing cases 1306 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SENVOT94 S1 Vote in Senate election Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE 1 609 22.3 53.2 53.2 REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE 2 456 16.7 39.8 93.0 INDEPENDENT/OTHER 3 51 1.9 4.5 97.5 DID NOT VOTE 4 29 1.1 2.5 100.0 . 1580 58.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1145 Missing cases 1580 CANVDS94 S2 Canvassing, Dem Senate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2652 97.3 97.3 97.3 CHECKED 1 73 2.7 2.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLRKDS94 S2 Clerical/office, Dem Senate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2692 98.8 98.8 98.8 CHECKED 1 33 1.2 1.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVDS94 S2 Tried to convince friends, Dem Senate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2358 86.5 86.5 86.5 CHECKED 1 367 13.5 13.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 MONDS94 S2 Contributed money, Dem Senate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2524 92.6 92.6 92.6 CHECKED 1 201 7.4 7.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OTHRDS94 S2 Other activity, Dem Senate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2590 95.0 95.0 95.0 CHECKED 1 135 5.0 5.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVRS94 S2 Canvassing, Rep Senate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2646 97.1 97.1 97.1 CHECKED 1 79 2.9 2.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 CLRKRS94 S2 Clerical/office, Rep Senate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 2683 98.5 98.5 98.5 1 42 1.5 1.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVRS94 S2 Tried to convince friends, Rep Senate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 2426 89.0 89.0 89.0 1 299 11.0 11.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONRS94 S2 Contributed money, Rep Senate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 2530 92.8 92.8 92.8 1 195 7.2 7.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 OTHRRS94 S2 Other activity, Rep Senate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 2591 95.1 95.1 95.1 1 134 4.9 4.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVIS94 S2 Canvassing, Ind Senate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2721 99.9 99.9 99.9 CHECKED 1 4 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLRKIS94 S2 Clerical/office, Ind Senate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2722 99.9 99.9 99.9 CHECKED 1 3 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 CONVIS94 S2 Tried to convince friends, Ind Senate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2693 98.8 98.8 98.8 CHECKED 1 32 1.2 1.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONIS94 S2 Contributed money, Ind Senate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2712 99.5 99.5 99.5 CHECKED 1 13 .5 .5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OTHRIS94 S2 Other activity, Ind Senate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2716 99.7 99.7 99.7 CHECKED 1 9 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 ARMDS94 S3 Gun control, Dem Senate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 229 8.4 26.6 26.6 2 397 14.6 46.2 72.8 3 107 3.9 12.4 85.2 4 36 1.3 4.2 89.4 5 17 .6 2.0 91.4 6 53 1.9 6.2 97.6 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 21 .8 2.4 100.0 . 1769 64.9 Missing NOT SURE 8 96 3.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 860 Missing cases 1865 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ARMRS94 S3 Gun control, Rep Senate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 30 1.1 3.9 3.9 2 50 1.8 6.5 10.3 3 30 1.1 3.9 14.2 4 22 .8 2.8 17.0 5 36 1.3 4.6 21.7 6 201 7.4 25.9 47.6 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 406 14.9 52.4 100.0 . 1865 68.4 Missing NOT SURE 8 85 3.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 775 Missing cases 1950 NHIDS94 S3 Natl health ins, Dem Senate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 257 9.4 29.1 29.1 2 392 14.4 44.4 73.6 3 142 5.2 16.1 89.7 4 34 1.2 3.9 93.5 5 11 .4 1.2 94.8 6 18 .7 2.0 96.8 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 28 1.0 3.2 100.0 . 1767 64.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 76 2.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 882 Missing cases 1843 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NHIRS94 S3 Natl health ins, Rep Senate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 12 .4 1.6 1.6 2 32 1.2 4.2 5.7 3 38 1.4 4.9 10.7 4 14 .5 1.8 12.5 5 35 1.3 4.6 17.0 6 202 7.4 26.3 43.3 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 436 16.0 56.7 100.0 . 1868 68.6 Missing NOT SURE 8 88 3.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 769 Missing cases 1956 DEFDS94 S3 Reduce deficit/up tax, Dem Senate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 115 4.2 14.4 14.4 2 263 9.7 32.8 47.2 3 173 6.3 21.6 68.8 4 61 2.2 7.6 76.4 5 39 1.4 4.9 81.3 6 95 3.5 11.9 93.1 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 55 2.0 6.9 100.0 . 1780 65.3 Missing NOT SURE 8 144 5.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 801 Missing cases 1924 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEFRS94 S3 Reduce deficit/up tax, Rep Senate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 75 2.8 10.8 10.8 2 142 5.2 20.5 31.3 3 61 2.2 8.8 40.1 4 30 1.1 4.3 44.4 5 47 1.7 6.8 51.2 6 163 6.0 23.5 74.6 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 176 6.5 25.4 100.0 . 1887 69.2 Missing NOT SURE 8 144 5.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 694 Missing cases 2031 GOV94 S4 Was there also a governors race Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 750 27.5 63.1 63.1 NO 2 438 16.1 36.9 100.0 . 1537 56.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1188 Missing cases 1537 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GUBVOT94 G1 Vote in gubernatorial election Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE 1 495 18.2 46.9 46.9 REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE 2 533 19.6 50.5 97.3 INDEPENDENT/OTHER 3 5 .2 .5 97.8 DID NOT VOTE 4 23 .8 2.2 100.0 . 1669 61.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1056 Missing cases 1669 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVDG94 G2 Canvassing, Dem gubernatorial Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2673 98.1 98.1 98.1 CHECKED 1 52 1.9 1.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 CLRKDG94 G2 Clerical/office, Dem gubernatorial Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2712 99.5 99.5 99.5 CHECKED 1 13 .5 .5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVDG94 G2 Tried to convince friends, Dem gub Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2457 90.2 90.2 90.2 CHECKED 1 268 9.8 9.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONDG94 G2 Contributed money, Dem gubernatorial Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2575 94.5 94.5 94.5 CHECKED 1 150 5.5 5.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 OTHRDG94 G2 Other activity, Dem gubernatorial Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2639 96.8 96.8 96.8 CHECKED 1 86 3.2 3.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVRG94 G2 Canvassing, Rep gubernatorial Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2659 97.6 97.6 97.6 CHECKED 1 66 2.4 2.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLRKRG94 G2 Clerical/office, Rep gubernatorial Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2701 99.1 99.1 99.1 CHECKED 1 24 .9 .9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 CONVRG94 G2 Tried to convince friends, Rep gub Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2445 89.7 89.7 89.7 CHECKED 1 280 10.3 10.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONRG94 G2 Contributed money, Rep gubernatorial Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2511 92.1 92.1 92.1 CHECKED 1 214 7.9 7.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OTHRRG94 G2 Other activity, Rep gubernatorial Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2593 95.2 95.2 95.2 CHECKED 1 132 4.8 4.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 CANVIG94 G2 Canvassing, Ind gubernatorial Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2724 100.0 100.0 100.0 CHECKED 1 1 .0 .0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLRKIG94 G2 Clerical/office, Ind gubernatorial Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2725 100.0 100.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVIG94 G2 Tried to convince friends, Ind gub Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2721 99.9 99.9 99.9 CHECKED 1 4 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 MONIG94 G2 Contributed money, Ind gubernatorial Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2723 99.9 99.9 99.9 CHECKED 1 2 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OTHRIG94 G2 Other activity, Ind gubernatorial Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2725 100.0 100.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ARMDG94 G3 Position-gun control, Dem gubernatori Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 244 9.0 33.5 33.5 2 314 11.5 43.1 76.6 3 79 2.9 10.9 87.5 4 39 1.4 5.4 92.9 5 14 .5 1.9 94.8 6 27 1.0 3.7 98.5 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 11 .4 1.5 100.0 . 1888 69.3 Missing NOT SURE 8 109 4.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 728 Missing cases 1997 ARMRG94 G3 Position-gun control, Rep gubernatori Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 28 1.0 3.9 3.9 2 85 3.1 12.0 15.9 3 39 1.4 5.5 21.4 4 49 1.8 6.9 28.3 5 69 2.5 9.7 38.0 6 236 8.7 33.2 71.3 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 204 7.5 28.7 100.0 . 1904 69.9 Missing NOT SURE 8 111 4.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 710 Missing cases 2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TAXDG94 G3 Position-tax concessions, Dem gub Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 62 2.3 9.6 9.6 2 201 7.4 31.1 40.7 3 162 5.9 25.1 65.8 4 87 3.2 13.5 79.3 5 37 1.4 5.7 85.0 6 60 2.2 9.3 94.3 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 37 1.4 5.7 100.0 . 1914 70.2 Missing NOT SURE 8 165 6.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 646 Missing cases 2079 TAXRG94 G3 Position-tax concessions, Rep gub Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 262 9.6 34.3 34.3 2 338 12.4 44.3 78.6 3 85 3.1 11.1 89.8 4 29 1.1 3.8 93.6 5 15 .6 2.0 95.5 6 22 .8 2.9 98.4 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 12 .4 1.6 100.0 . 1887 69.2 Missing NOT SURE 8 75 2.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 763 Missing cases 1962 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - POLLDG94 G3 Position-control pollution, Dem gub Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 205 7.5 31.0 31.0 2 299 11.0 45.2 76.1 3 93 3.4 14.0 90.2 4 36 1.3 5.4 95.6 5 7 .3 1.1 96.7 6 11 .4 1.7 98.3 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 11 .4 1.7 100.0 . 1912 70.2 Missing NOT SURE 8 151 5.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 662 Missing cases 2063 POLLRG94 G3 Position-control pollution, Rep gub Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 17 .6 2.5 2.5 2 83 3.0 12.2 14.7 3 98 3.6 14.5 29.2 4 84 3.1 12.4 41.6 5 102 3.7 15.0 56.6 6 185 6.8 27.3 83.9 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 109 4.0 16.1 100.0 . 1903 69.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 144 5.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 678 Missing cases 2047 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PTYHRS94 Q14 Hours per week for camp/party activi Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 691 25.4 45.6 45.6 LESS THAN 2 HOURS 2 490 18.0 32.4 78.0 TWO TO 5 HOURS 3 181 6.6 12.0 90.0 FIVE TO 10 HOURS 4 75 2.8 5.0 94.9 MORE THAN 10 HOURS 5 77 2.8 5.1 100.0 . 1211 44.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1514 Missing cases 1211 METDH94 Q15 Met candidate personally, Dem hse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2440 89.5 89.5 89.5 CHECKED 1 285 10.5 10.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RALDH94 Q15 Attended meeting/rally, Dem hse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2503 91.9 91.9 91.9 CHECKED 1 222 8.1 8.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTDH94 Q15 Contacted by staff, Dem hse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2384 87.5 87.5 87.5 CHECKED 1 341 12.5 12.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 MAILDH94 Q15 Received mail, Dem hse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1905 69.9 69.9 69.9 CHECKED 1 820 30.1 30.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ADDH94 Q15 Saw/heard ad, Dem hse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1795 65.9 65.9 65.9 CHECKED 1 930 34.1 34.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - METRH94 Q15 Met candidate personally, Rep hse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2338 85.8 85.8 85.8 CHECKED 1 387 14.2 14.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 RALRH94 Q15 Attended meeting/rally, Rep hse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2394 87.9 87.9 87.9 CHECKED 1 331 12.1 12.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTRH94 Q15 Contacted by staff, Rep hse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2354 86.4 86.4 86.4 CHECKED 1 371 13.6 13.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MAILRH94 Q15 Received mail, Rep hse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1850 67.9 67.9 67.9 CHECKED 1 875 32.1 32.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 ADRH94 Q15 Saw/heard ad, Rep hse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1783 65.4 65.4 65.4 CHECKED 1 942 34.6 34.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - METIH94 Q15 Met candidate personally, Ind hse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2712 99.5 99.5 99.5 CHECKED 1 13 .5 .5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RALIH94 Q15 Attended meeting/rally, Ind hse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2712 99.5 99.5 99.5 CHECKED 1 13 .5 .5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 CONTIH94 Q15 Contacted by staff, Ind hse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2710 99.4 99.4 99.4 CHECKED 1 15 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MAILIH94 Q15 Received mail, Ind hse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2641 96.9 96.9 96.9 CHECKED 1 84 3.1 3.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ADIH94 Q15 Saw/heard ad, Ind hse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2564 94.1 94.1 94.1 CHECKED 1 161 5.9 5.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 INFL94 Q16 Next couple years, most likely to Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent WORK WITHIN THE DEMO 1 308 11.3 20.4 20.4 WORK WITHIN THE REPU 2 395 14.5 26.1 46.5 WORK WITHIN A THIRD 3 19 .7 1.3 47.8 STAY INVOLVED BUT NO 4 322 11.8 21.3 69.1 NOT BE INVOLVED IN P 5 154 5.7 10.2 79.3 NOT SURE AT THIS TIM 6 313 11.5 20.7 100.0 . 1214 44.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1511 Missing cases 1214 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TCHNEV94 Q17 Teacher org, not member Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1782 65.4 65.4 65.4 CHECKED 1 943 34.6 34.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TCHOLD94 Q17 Teacher org, not active in last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2682 98.4 98.4 98.4 CHECKED 1 43 1.6 1.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 TCHPRO94 Q17 Teacher org, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2714 99.6 99.6 99.6 CHECKED 1 11 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TCHOTH94 Q17 Teacher org, tried to convince othrs Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2686 98.6 98.6 98.6 CHECKED 1 39 1.4 1.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TCHPD94 Q17 Teacher org, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2635 96.7 96.7 96.7 CHECKED 1 90 3.3 3.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 TCHATT94 Q17 Teacher org, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2666 97.8 97.8 97.8 CHECKED 1 59 2.2 2.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TCHLDR94 Q17 Teacher org, leadership role Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2695 98.9 98.9 98.9 CHECKED 1 30 1.1 1.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BUSNEV94 Q17 Business org, not member Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1871 68.7 68.7 68.7 CHECKED 1 854 31.3 31.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 BUSOLD94 Q17 Business org, not active in last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2665 97.8 97.8 97.8 CHECKED 1 60 2.2 2.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BUSPRO94 Q17 Business org, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2723 99.9 99.9 99.9 CHECKED 1 2 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BUSOTH94 Q17 Business org, tried to convince othr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2701 99.1 99.1 99.1 CHECKED 1 24 .9 .9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 BUSPD94 Q17 Business org, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2608 95.7 95.7 95.7 CHECKED 1 117 4.3 4.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BUSATT94 Q17 Business org, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2630 96.5 96.5 96.5 CHECKED 1 95 3.5 3.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BUSLDR94 Q17 Business org, leadership role Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2686 98.6 98.6 98.6 CHECKED 1 39 1.4 1.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 VETNEV94 Q17 Veterans group, not member Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1870 68.6 68.6 68.6 CHECKED 1 855 31.4 31.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - VETOLD94 Q17 Veterans group, not active in last y Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2635 96.7 96.7 96.7 CHECKED 1 90 3.3 3.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - VETPRO94 Q17 Veterans group, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2723 99.9 99.9 99.9 CHECKED 1 2 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 VETOTH94 Q17 Veterans group, tried to convince ot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2701 99.1 99.1 99.1 CHECKED 1 24 .9 .9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - VETPD94 Q17 Veterans group, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2614 95.9 95.9 95.9 CHECKED 1 111 4.1 4.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - VETATT94 Q17 Veterans group, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2670 98.0 98.0 98.0 CHECKED 1 55 2.0 2.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 VETLDR94 Q17 Veterans group, leadership role Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2699 99.0 99.0 99.0 CHECKED 1 26 1.0 1.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WOMNEV94 Q17 Womens group, not member Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1780 65.3 65.3 65.3 CHECKED 1 945 34.7 34.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WOMOLD94 Q17 Womens group, not active in last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2691 98.8 98.8 98.8 CHECKED 1 34 1.2 1.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 WOMPRO94 Q17 Womens group, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2721 99.9 99.9 99.9 CHECKED 1 4 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WOMOTH94 Q17 Womens group, tried to convince othr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2709 99.4 99.4 99.4 CHECKED 1 16 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WOMPD94 Q17 Womens group, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2676 98.2 98.2 98.2 CHECKED 1 49 1.8 1.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 WOMATT94 Q17 Womens group, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2705 99.3 99.3 99.3 CHECKED 1 20 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WOMLDR94 Q17 Womens group, leadership role Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2716 99.7 99.7 99.7 CHECKED 1 9 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CIVNEV94 Q17 Civil rights, not member Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1774 65.1 65.1 65.1 CHECKED 1 951 34.9 34.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 CIVOLD94 Q17 Civil rights, not active in last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2689 98.7 98.7 98.7 CHECKED 1 36 1.3 1.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CIVPRO94 Q17 Civil rights, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2722 99.9 99.9 99.9 CHECKED 1 3 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CIVOTH94 Q17 Civil rights, tried to convince othr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2708 99.4 99.4 99.4 CHECKED 1 17 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 CIVPD94 Q17 Civil rights, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2672 98.1 98.1 98.1 CHECKED 1 53 1.9 1.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CIVATT94 Q17 Civil rights, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2695 98.9 98.9 98.9 CHECKED 1 30 1.1 1.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CIVLDR94 Q17 Civil rights, leadership role Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2715 99.6 99.6 99.6 CHECKED 1 10 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 ENVNEV94 Q17 Environ group, not member Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1840 67.5 67.5 67.5 CHECKED 1 885 32.5 32.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ENVOLD94 Q17 Environ group, not active in last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2668 97.9 97.9 97.9 CHECKED 1 57 2.1 2.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ENVPRO94 Q17 Environ group, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2720 99.8 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 5 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 ENVOTH94 Q17 Environ group, tried to convince oth Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2704 99.2 99.2 99.2 CHECKED 1 21 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ENVPD94 Q17 Environ group, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2616 96.0 96.0 96.0 CHECKED 1 109 4.0 4.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ENVATT94 Q17 Environ group, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2696 98.9 98.9 98.9 CHECKED 1 29 1.1 1.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 ENVLDR94 Q17 Environ group, leadership role Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2713 99.6 99.6 99.6 CHECKED 1 12 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INTNEV94 Q17 Interest groups, not member Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1816 66.6 66.6 66.6 CHECKED 1 909 33.4 33.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INTOLD94 Q17 Interest groups, not active in last Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2677 98.2 98.2 98.2 CHECKED 1 48 1.8 1.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 INTPRO94 Q17 Interest groups, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2722 99.9 99.9 99.9 CHECKED 1 3 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INTOTH94 Q17 Interest groups, tried to convince o Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2708 99.4 99.4 99.4 CHECKED 1 17 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INTPD94 Q17 Interest groups, paid membership due Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2646 97.1 97.1 97.1 CHECKED 1 79 2.9 2.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 INTATT94 Q17 Interest groups, attend group meetin Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2664 97.8 97.8 97.8 CHECKED 1 61 2.2 2.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INTLDR94 Q17 Interest groups, leadership role Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2705 99.3 99.3 99.3 CHECKED 1 20 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LABNEV94 Q17 Labor Union, not member Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1812 66.5 66.5 66.5 CHECKED 1 913 33.5 33.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 LABOLD94 Q17 Labor Union, not active in last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2673 98.1 98.1 98.1 CHECKED 1 52 1.9 1.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LABPRO94 Q17 Labor Union, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2713 99.6 99.6 99.6 CHECKED 1 12 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LABOTH94 Q17 Labor Union, tried to convince othrs Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2694 98.9 98.9 98.9 CHECKED 1 31 1.1 1.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 LABPD94 Q17 Labor Union, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2641 96.9 96.9 96.9 CHECKED 1 84 3.1 3.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LABATT94 Q17 Labor Union, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2673 98.1 98.1 98.1 CHECKED 1 52 1.9 1.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LABLDR94 Q17 Labor Union, leadership role Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2701 99.1 99.1 99.1 CHECKED 1 24 .9 .9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 FRMNEV94 Q17 Farm org, not member Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1847 67.8 67.8 67.8 CHECKED 1 878 32.2 32.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FRMOLD94 Q17 Farm org, not active in last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2658 97.5 97.5 97.5 CHECKED 1 67 2.5 2.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FRMPRO94 Q17 Farm org, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2722 99.9 99.9 99.9 CHECKED 1 3 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 FRMOTH94 Q17 Farm org, tried to convince othrs Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2705 99.3 99.3 99.3 CHECKED 1 20 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FRMPD94 Q17 Farm org, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2633 96.6 96.6 96.6 CHECKED 1 92 3.4 3.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FRMATT94 Q17 Farm org, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2656 97.5 97.5 97.5 CHECKED 1 69 2.5 2.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 FRMLDR94 Q17 Farm org, leadership role Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2706 99.3 99.3 99.3 CHECKED 1 19 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - JESNEV94 Q17 Evangelical, not member Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1770 65.0 65.0 65.0 CHECKED 1 955 35.0 35.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - JESOLD94 Q17 Evangelical, not active in last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2702 99.2 99.2 99.2 CHECKED 1 23 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 JESPRO94 Q17 Evangelical, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2724 100.0 100.0 100.0 CHECKED 1 1 .0 .0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - JESOTH94 Q17 Evangelical, tried to convince othrs Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2707 99.3 99.3 99.3 CHECKED 1 18 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - JESPD94 Q17 Evangelical, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2691 98.8 98.8 98.8 CHECKED 1 34 1.2 1.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 JESATT94 Q17 Evangelical, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2698 99.0 99.0 99.0 CHECKED 1 27 1.0 1.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - JESLDR94 Q17 Evangelical, leadership role Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2713 99.6 99.6 99.6 CHECKED 1 12 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABNEV94 Q17 Anti-abortion, not member Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1807 66.3 66.3 66.3 CHECKED 1 918 33.7 33.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 ABOLD94 Q17 Anti-abortion, not active in last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2684 98.5 98.5 98.5 CHECKED 1 41 1.5 1.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABPRO94 Q17 Anti-abortion, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2709 99.4 99.4 99.4 CHECKED 1 16 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABOTH94 Q17 Anti-abortion, tried to convince oth Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2698 99.0 99.0 99.0 CHECKED 1 27 1.0 1.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 ABPD94 Q17 Anti-abortion, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2668 97.9 97.9 97.9 CHECKED 1 57 2.1 2.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABATT94 Q17 Anti-abortion, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2698 99.0 99.0 99.0 CHECKED 1 27 1.0 1.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABLDR94 Q17 Anti-abortion, leadership role Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2719 99.8 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 6 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 LIBNEV94 Q17 Liberal ideol, not member Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1765 64.8 64.8 64.8 CHECKED 1 960 35.2 35.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LIBOLD94 Q17 Liberal ideol, not active in last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2704 99.2 99.2 99.2 CHECKED 1 21 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LIBPRO94 Q17 Liberal ideol, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2722 99.9 99.9 99.9 CHECKED 1 3 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 LIBOTH94 Q17 Liberal ideol, tried to convince oth Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2717 99.7 99.7 99.7 CHECKED 1 8 .3 .3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LIBPD94 Q17 Liberal ideol, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2696 98.9 98.9 98.9 CHECKED 1 29 1.1 1.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LIBATT94 Q17 Liberal ideol, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2707 99.3 99.3 99.3 CHECKED 1 18 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 LIBLDR94 Q17 Liberal ideol, leadership role Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2722 99.9 99.9 99.9 CHECKED 1 3 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONNEV94 Q17 Cons ideol, not member Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1798 66.0 66.0 66.0 CHECKED 1 927 34.0 34.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONOLD94 Q17 Cons ideol, not active in last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2701 99.1 99.1 99.1 CHECKED 1 24 .9 .9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 CONPRO94 Q17 Cons ideol, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2723 99.9 99.9 99.9 CHECKED 1 2 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONOTH94 Q17 Cons ideol, tried to convince othrs Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2702 99.2 99.2 99.2 CHECKED 1 23 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONPD94 Q17 Cons ideol, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2683 98.5 98.5 98.5 CHECKED 1 42 1.5 1.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 CONATT94 Q17 Cons ideol, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2696 98.9 98.9 98.9 CHECKED 1 29 1.1 1.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONLDR94 Q17 Cons ideol, leadership role Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2714 99.6 99.6 99.6 CHECKED 1 11 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NABNEV94 Q17 Neighborhood, not member Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1872 68.7 68.7 68.7 CHECKED 1 853 31.3 31.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 NABOLD94 Q17 Neighborhood, not active in last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2646 97.1 97.1 97.1 CHECKED 1 79 2.9 2.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NABPRO94 Q17 Neighborhood, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2722 99.9 99.9 99.9 CHECKED 1 3 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NABOTH94 Q17 Neighborhood, tried to convince othr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2689 98.7 98.7 98.7 CHECKED 1 36 1.3 1.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 NABPD94 Q17 Neighborhood, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2694 98.9 98.9 98.9 CHECKED 1 31 1.1 1.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NABATT94 Q17 Neighborhood, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2649 97.2 97.2 97.2 CHECKED 1 76 2.8 2.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NABLDR94 Q17 Neighborhood, leadership role Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2694 98.9 98.9 98.9 CHECKED 1 31 1.1 1.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 EDNEV94 Q17 Educational, not member Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1839 67.5 67.5 67.5 CHECKED 1 886 32.5 32.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EDOLD94 Q17 Educational, not active in last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2680 98.3 98.3 98.3 CHECKED 1 45 1.7 1.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EDPRO94 Q17 Educational, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2722 99.9 99.9 99.9 CHECKED 1 3 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 EDOTH94 Q17 Educational, tried to convince othrs Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2708 99.4 99.4 99.4 CHECKED 1 17 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EDPD94 Q17 Educational, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2666 97.8 97.8 97.8 CHECKED 1 59 2.2 2.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EDATT94 Q17 Educational, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2652 97.3 97.3 97.3 CHECKED 1 73 2.7 2.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 EDLDR94 Q17 Educational, leadership role Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2700 99.1 99.1 99.1 CHECKED 1 25 .9 .9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - UWSNEV94 Q17 United We Stand, not member Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1771 65.0 65.0 65.0 CHECKED 1 954 35.0 35.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - UWSOLD94 Q17 United We Stand, not active in last Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2703 99.2 99.2 99.2 CHECKED 1 22 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 UWSPRO94 Q17 United We Stand, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2724 100.0 100.0 100.0 CHECKED 1 1 .0 .0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - UWSOTH94 Q17 United We Stand, tried to convince o Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2720 99.8 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 5 .2 .2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - UWSPD94 Q17 United We Stand, paid membership due Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2702 99.2 99.2 99.2 CHECKED 1 23 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 UWSATT94 Q17 United We Stand, attend group meetin Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2712 99.5 99.5 99.5 CHECKED 1 13 .5 .5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - UWSLDR94 Q17 United We Stand, leadership role Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2721 99.9 99.9 99.9 CHECKED 1 4 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CHUNEV94 Q17 Church, not member Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2200 80.7 80.7 80.7 CHECKED 1 525 19.3 19.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 CHUOLD94 Q17 Church, not active in last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2565 94.1 94.1 94.1 CHECKED 1 160 5.9 5.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CHUPRO94 Q17 Church, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2704 99.2 99.2 99.2 CHECKED 1 21 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CHUOTH94 Q17 Church, tried to convince othrs Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2603 95.5 95.5 95.5 CHECKED 1 122 4.5 4.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 CHUPD94 Q17 Church, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2519 92.4 92.4 92.4 CHECKED 1 206 7.6 7.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CHUATT94 Q17 Church, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2400 88.1 88.1 88.1 CHECKED 1 325 11.9 11.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CHULDR94 Q17 Church, leadership role Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2485 91.2 91.2 91.2 CHECKED 1 240 8.8 8.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 LDPFRD94 Q18 Friends in local Democratic party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 409 15.0 34.7 34.7 ONE OR TWO 2 253 9.3 21.5 56.2 THREE OR MORE 3 515 18.9 43.8 100.0 . 1416 52.0 Missing NOT SURE 4 132 4.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1177 Missing cases 1548 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LRPFRD94 Q18 Friends in local Republican party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 394 14.5 33.8 33.8 ONE OR TWO 2 205 7.5 17.6 51.4 THREE OR MORE 3 566 20.8 48.6 100.0 . 1440 52.8 Missing NOT SURE 4 120 4.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1165 Missing cases 1560 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - UWSFRD94 Q18 Friends in United We Stand, America Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 793 29.1 86.7 86.7 ONE OR TWO 2 87 3.2 9.5 96.2 THREE OR MORE 3 35 1.3 3.8 100.0 . 1634 60.0 Missing NOT SURE 4 176 6.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 915 Missing cases 1810 VETFRD94 Q18 Friends in Veterans groups Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 501 18.4 48.5 48.5 ONE OR TWO 2 244 9.0 23.6 72.1 THREE OR MORE 3 288 10.6 27.9 100.0 . 1547 56.8 Missing NOT SURE 4 145 5.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1033 Missing cases 1692 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WOMFRD94 Q18 Friends in Womens rights groups Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 701 25.7 72.3 72.3 ONE OR TWO 2 138 5.1 14.2 86.5 THREE OR MORE 3 131 4.8 13.5 100.0 . 1606 58.9 Missing NOT SURE 4 149 5.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 970 Missing cases 1755 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CIVFRD94 Q18 Friends in Civil rights groups Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 718 26.3 72.9 72.9 ONE OR TWO 2 110 4.0 11.2 84.1 THREE OR MORE 3 157 5.8 15.9 100.0 . 1614 59.2 Missing NOT SURE 4 126 4.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 985 Missing cases 1740 ENVFRD94 Q18 Friends in environmental groups Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 648 23.8 66.8 66.8 ONE OR TWO 2 188 6.9 19.4 86.2 THREE OR MORE 3 134 4.9 13.8 100.0 . 1607 59.0 Missing NOT SURE 4 148 5.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 970 Missing cases 1755 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INTFRD94 Q18 Friends in interest groups Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 644 23.6 66.1 66.1 ONE OR TWO 2 157 5.8 16.1 82.2 THREE OR MORE 3 174 6.4 17.8 100.0 . 1604 58.9 Missing NOT SURE 4 146 5.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 975 Missing cases 1750 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - JESFRD94 Q18 Friends in evangelical groups Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 723 26.5 74.4 74.4 ONE OR TWO 2 116 4.3 11.9 86.3 THREE OR MORE 3 133 4.9 13.7 100.0 . 1606 58.9 Missing NOT SURE 4 147 5.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 972 Missing cases 1753 ABFRD94 Q18 Friends in anti-abortion groups Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 664 24.4 67.3 67.3 ONE OR TWO 2 133 4.9 13.5 80.8 THREE OR MORE 3 189 6.9 19.2 100.0 . 1595 58.5 Missing NOT SURE 4 144 5.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 986 Missing cases 1739 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LIBFRD94 Q18 Friends in lib ideological groups Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 712 26.1 76.8 76.8 ONE OR TWO 2 102 3.7 11.0 87.8 THREE OR MORE 3 113 4.1 12.2 100.0 . 1630 59.8 Missing NOT SURE 4 168 6.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 927 Missing cases 1798 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONFRD94 Q18 Friends in cons ideological groups Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 661 24.3 71.3 71.3 ONE OR TWO 2 113 4.1 12.2 83.5 THREE OR MORE 3 153 5.6 16.5 100.0 . 1629 59.8 Missing NOT SURE 4 169 6.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 927 Missing cases 1798 NABFRD94 Q18 Friends in crime/neighborhood groups Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 553 20.3 57.0 57.0 ONE OR TWO 2 169 6.2 17.4 74.4 THREE OR MORE 3 249 9.1 25.6 100.0 . 1586 58.2 Missing NOT SURE 4 168 6.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 971 Missing cases 1754 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EDFRD94 Q18 Friends in educational groups Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 410 15.0 39.2 39.2 ONE OR TWO 2 213 7.8 20.4 59.6 THREE OR MORE 3 422 15.5 40.4 100.0 . 1561 57.3 Missing NOT SURE 4 119 4.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1045 Missing cases 1680 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CHUFRD94 Q18 Friends in church groups Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 240 8.8 20.2 20.2 ONE OR TWO 2 185 6.8 15.5 35.7 THREE OR MORE 3 765 28.1 64.3 100.0 . 1447 53.1 Missing NOT SURE 4 88 3.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1190 Missing cases 1535 NECON94 Q19 Rate national economy Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUCH WORSE 1 45 1.7 3.0 3.0 2 201 7.4 13.3 16.2 3 402 14.8 26.5 42.8 4 653 24.0 43.1 85.9 MUCH BETTER 5 214 7.9 14.1 100.0 . 1210 44.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1515 Missing cases 1210 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PECON94 Q19 Rate family financial situation Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUCH WORSE 1 34 1.2 2.3 2.3 2 222 8.1 14.9 17.2 3 776 28.5 52.0 69.2 4 373 13.7 25.0 94.2 MUCH BETTER 5 86 3.2 5.8 100.0 . 1234 45.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1491 Missing cases 1234 SECON94 Q19 Rate state economy Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUCH WORSE 1 23 .8 1.5 1.5 2 172 6.3 11.6 13.1 3 481 17.7 32.4 45.5 4 599 22.0 40.3 85.8 MUCH BETTER 5 211 7.7 14.2 100.0 . 1239 45.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1486 Missing cases 1239 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FNECON94 Q20 Rate future national economy Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUCH WORSE 1 50 1.8 3.3 3.3 2 240 8.8 15.8 19.1 3 582 21.4 38.4 57.6 4 549 20.1 36.2 93.8 MUCH BETTER 5 94 3.4 6.2 100.0 . 1210 44.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1515 Missing cases 1210 FPECON94 Q20 Rate future family financial situati Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUCH WORSE 1 23 .8 1.5 1.5 2 169 6.2 11.3 12.9 3 881 32.3 59.0 71.8 4 364 13.4 24.4 96.2 MUCH BETTER 5 57 2.1 3.8 100.0 . 1231 45.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1494 Missing cases 1231 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FSECON94 Q20 Rate future state economy Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUCH WORSE 1 38 1.4 2.5 2.5 2 198 7.3 13.3 15.8 3 664 24.4 44.5 60.3 4 475 17.4 31.8 92.1 MUCH BETTER 5 118 4.3 7.9 100.0 . 1232 45.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1493 Missing cases 1232 PTYM94 Q21 Partisanship, mother Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACTIVE DEMOCRAT 1 109 4.0 14.7 14.7 INACTIVE DEMOCRAT 2 242 8.9 32.6 47.3 ACTIVE REPUBLICAN 3 85 3.1 11.5 58.8 INACTIVE REPUBLICAN 4 227 8.3 30.6 89.4 ACTIVE INDEPENDENT 5 14 .5 1.9 91.2 INACTIVE INDEPENDENT 6 65 2.4 8.8 100.0 . 1913 70.2 Missing NOT SURE 7 70 2.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 742 Missing cases 1983 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PTYF94 Q21 Partisanship, father Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACTIVE DEMOCRAT 1 98 3.6 16.4 16.4 INACTIVE DEMOCRAT 2 170 6.2 28.5 44.9 ACTIVE REPUBLICAN 3 95 3.5 15.9 60.8 INACTIVE REPUBLICAN 4 179 6.6 30.0 90.8 ACTIVE INDEPENDENT 5 10 .4 1.7 92.5 INACTIVE INDEPENDENT 6 45 1.7 7.5 100.0 . 2063 75.7 Missing NOT SURE 7 65 2.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 597 Missing cases 2128 PTYSP94 Q21 Partisanship, spouse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACTIVE DEMOCRAT 1 238 8.7 20.6 20.6 INACTIVE DEMOCRAT 2 275 10.1 23.8 44.4 ACTIVE REPUBLICAN 3 266 9.8 23.0 67.4 INACTIVE REPUBLICAN 4 252 9.2 21.8 89.3 ACTIVE INDEPENDENT 5 40 1.5 3.5 92.7 INACTIVE INDEPENDENT 6 84 3.1 7.3 100.0 . 1529 56.1 Missing NOT SURE 7 41 1.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1155 Missing cases 1570 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABORT94 Q22a Opinion-amendment banning abortion Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 219 8.0 14.8 14.8 2 167 6.1 11.3 26.1 3 78 2.9 5.3 31.3 4 93 3.4 6.3 37.6 5 56 2.1 3.8 41.4 6 243 8.9 16.4 57.8 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 625 22.9 42.2 100.0 . 1212 44.5 Missing NOT SURE 8 32 1.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1481 Missing cases 1244 IMPORT94 Q22b Opinion-limits on foreign imports Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 197 7.2 13.6 13.6 2 276 10.1 19.1 32.7 3 232 8.5 16.0 48.8 4 140 5.1 9.7 58.4 5 149 5.5 10.3 68.7 6 275 10.1 19.0 87.8 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 177 6.5 12.2 100.0 . 1213 44.5 Missing NOT SURE 8 66 2.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1446 Missing cases 1279 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AFFACT94 Q22c Opinion-affirmative action Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 94 3.4 6.5 6.5 2 179 6.6 12.3 18.8 3 233 8.6 16.0 34.8 4 211 7.7 14.5 49.3 5 156 5.7 10.7 60.0 6 269 9.9 18.5 78.5 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 312 11.4 21.5 100.0 . 1227 45.0 Missing NOT SURE 8 44 1.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1454 Missing cases 1271 POLLUT94 Q22d Opinion-gov regulation on pollution Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 236 8.7 16.0 16.0 2 336 12.3 22.8 38.9 3 264 9.7 17.9 56.8 4 105 3.9 7.1 63.9 5 132 4.8 9.0 72.9 6 209 7.7 14.2 87.1 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 190 7.0 12.9 100.0 . 1223 44.9 Missing NOT SURE 8 30 1.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1472 Missing cases 1253 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INVOL94 Q22e Opinion-decrease US involvement Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 209 7.7 14.3 14.3 2 333 12.2 22.8 37.1 3 295 10.8 20.2 57.3 4 176 6.5 12.1 69.4 5 152 5.6 10.4 79.8 6 197 7.2 13.5 93.3 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 98 3.6 6.7 100.0 . 1221 44.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 44 1.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1460 Missing cases 1265 HOMO94 Q22f Opinion-homosexuals in military Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 137 5.0 9.4 9.4 2 256 9.4 17.6 27.1 3 95 3.5 6.5 33.6 4 316 11.6 21.8 55.4 5 95 3.5 6.5 61.9 6 169 6.2 11.6 73.6 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 384 14.1 26.4 100.0 . 1219 44.7 Missing NOT SURE 8 54 2.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1452 Missing cases 1273 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ARM94 Q22g Opinion-gun control Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 454 16.7 30.6 30.6 2 330 12.1 22.2 52.8 3 142 5.2 9.6 62.4 4 64 2.3 4.3 66.7 5 57 2.1 3.8 70.6 6 169 6.2 11.4 81.9 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 268 9.8 18.1 100.0 . 1218 44.7 Missing NOT SURE 8 23 .8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1484 Missing cases 1241 TERM94 Q22h Opinion-term limits Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 385 14.1 26.2 26.2 2 360 13.2 24.5 50.6 3 203 7.4 13.8 64.4 4 104 3.8 7.1 71.5 5 69 2.5 4.7 76.2 6 167 6.1 11.4 87.6 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 183 6.7 12.4 100.0 . 1216 44.6 Missing NOT SURE 8 38 1.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1471 Missing cases 1254 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEFTX94 Q22i Opinion-reduce deficit/increase tax Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 161 5.9 11.1 11.1 2 364 13.4 25.1 36.2 3 324 11.9 22.3 58.5 4 129 4.7 8.9 67.4 5 111 4.1 7.6 75.1 6 199 7.3 13.7 88.8 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 163 6.0 11.2 100.0 . 1230 45.1 Missing NOT SURE 8 44 1.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1451 Missing cases 1274 NHI94 Q22j Opinion-national health insurance Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 296 10.9 20.2 20.2 2 268 9.8 18.3 38.6 3 155 5.7 10.6 49.1 4 90 3.3 6.2 55.3 5 69 2.5 4.7 60.0 6 166 6.1 11.3 71.4 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 419 15.4 28.6 100.0 . 1216 44.6 Missing NOT SURE 8 46 1.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1463 Missing cases 1262 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TAX94 Q22k Opinion-make tax concessions Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 123 4.5 8.5 8.5 2 352 12.9 24.4 32.9 3 369 13.5 25.6 58.5 4 208 7.6 14.4 73.0 5 146 5.4 10.1 83.1 6 159 5.8 11.0 94.1 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 85 3.1 5.9 100.0 . 1226 45.0 Missing NOT SURE 8 57 2.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1442 Missing cases 1283 DEFGP94 Q22l Opinion-reduce deficit/cut programs Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 326 12.0 22.4 22.4 2 440 16.1 30.2 52.5 3 313 11.5 21.5 74.0 4 85 3.1 5.8 79.8 5 103 3.8 7.1 86.9 6 131 4.8 9.0 95.9 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 60 2.2 4.1 100.0 . 1217 44.7 Missing NOT SURE 8 50 1.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1458 Missing cases 1267 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEATH94 Q22m Opinion-death penalty Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 189 6.9 13.1 13.1 2 145 5.3 10.0 23.1 3 73 2.7 5.1 28.2 4 135 5.0 9.4 37.6 5 75 2.8 5.2 42.8 6 303 11.1 21.0 63.8 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 523 19.2 36.2 100.0 . 1225 45.0 Missing NOT SURE 8 57 2.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1443 Missing cases 1282 MIISS94 Q23 Most important issue Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ABORTION AMENDMENT 1 163 6.0 11.7 11.7 LIMIT FOREIGN IMPORT 2 48 1.8 3.4 15.1 AFFIRMATIVE ACTION 3 52 1.9 3.7 18.8 CONTROL POLLUTION 4 68 2.5 4.9 23.7 DECREASE US INVOLVEM 5 66 2.4 4.7 28.4 HOMOSEXUALS IN MILIT 6 26 1.0 1.9 30.3 GUN CONTROL 7 116 4.3 8.3 38.6 TERM LIMITS 8 67 2.5 4.8 43.4 REDUCE DEFICIT/UP TA 9 208 7.6 14.9 58.3 NATL HEALTH INS 10 272 10.0 19.5 77.7 TAX CONCESSIONS 11 18 .7 1.3 79.0 REDUCE DEFICIT/CUT P 12 244 9.0 17.5 96.5 DEATH PENALTY 13 49 1.8 3.5 100.0 . 1240 45.5 Missing NOT SURE 14 88 3.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1397 Missing cases 1328 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EFFDP94 Q24 Effectiveness of Dem party in CD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY EFFECTIVE 1 234 8.6 18.7 18.7 2 529 19.4 42.3 61.0 3 347 12.7 27.8 88.8 NOT AT ALL EFFECTIVE 4 140 5.1 11.2 100.0 . 1338 49.1 Missing NOT SURE 5 137 5.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1250 Missing cases 1475 EFFRP94 Q24 Effectiveness of Rep party in CD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY EFFECTIVE 1 320 11.7 26.4 26.4 2 602 22.1 49.6 76.0 3 219 8.0 18.1 94.1 NOT AT ALL EFFECTIVE 4 72 2.6 5.9 100.0 . 1392 51.1 Missing NOT SURE 5 120 4.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1213 Missing cases 1512 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EFFUWS94 Q24 Effectiveness of United We Stand in Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY EFFECTIVE 1 14 .5 2.6 2.6 2 55 2.0 10.1 12.7 3 143 5.2 26.3 39.0 NOT AT ALL EFFECTIVE 4 332 12.2 61.0 100.0 . 1605 58.9 Missing NOT SURE 5 576 21.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 544 Missing cases 2181 ARMBC94 Q25 Gun control, Bill Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 604 22.2 44.5 44.5 2 553 20.3 40.8 85.3 3 112 4.1 8.3 93.5 4 29 1.1 2.1 95.7 5 13 .5 1.0 96.6 6 21 .8 1.5 98.2 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 25 .9 1.8 100.0 . 1284 47.1 Missing NOT SURE 8 84 3.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1357 Missing cases 1368 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ARMHRP94 Q25 Gun control, H Ross Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 34 1.2 4.8 4.8 2 81 3.0 11.4 16.2 3 68 2.5 9.6 25.7 4 79 2.9 11.1 36.8 5 76 2.8 10.7 47.5 6 234 8.6 32.9 80.3 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 140 5.1 19.7 100.0 . 1389 51.0 Missing NOT SURE 8 624 22.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 712 Missing cases 2013 ARMBD94 Q25 Gun control, Bob Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 16 .6 1.4 1.4 2 78 2.9 6.9 8.3 3 71 2.6 6.3 14.7 4 41 1.5 3.6 18.3 5 137 5.0 12.2 30.5 6 468 17.2 41.6 72.0 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 315 11.6 28.0 100.0 . 1364 50.1 Missing NOT SURE 8 235 8.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1126 Missing cases 1599 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ARMDP94 Q25 Gun control, Dem party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 365 13.4 30.0 30.0 2 549 20.1 45.2 75.2 3 194 7.1 16.0 91.2 4 37 1.4 3.0 94.2 5 26 1.0 2.1 96.4 6 22 .8 1.8 98.2 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 22 .8 1.8 100.0 . 1366 50.1 Missing NOT SURE 8 144 5.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1215 Missing cases 1510 ARMRP94 Q25 Gun control, Rep party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 22 .8 1.8 1.8 2 68 2.5 5.6 7.5 3 69 2.5 5.7 13.2 4 31 1.1 2.6 15.8 5 131 4.8 10.9 26.7 6 509 18.7 42.3 68.9 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 374 13.7 31.1 100.0 . 1367 50.2 Missing NOT SURE 8 154 5.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1204 Missing cases 1521 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ARMDH94 Q25 Gun control, Dem hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 257 9.4 25.5 25.5 2 413 15.2 40.9 66.4 3 138 5.1 13.7 80.1 4 49 1.8 4.9 84.9 5 46 1.7 4.6 89.5 6 60 2.2 5.9 95.4 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 46 1.7 4.6 100.0 . 1427 52.4 Missing NOT SURE 8 289 10.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1009 Missing cases 1716 ARMRH94 Q25 Gun control, Rep hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 25 .9 2.3 2.3 2 78 2.9 7.3 9.7 3 72 2.6 6.7 16.4 4 35 1.3 3.3 19.7 5 102 3.7 9.6 29.2 6 358 13.1 33.6 62.8 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 397 14.6 37.2 100.0 . 1382 50.7 Missing NOT SURE 8 276 10.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1067 Missing cases 1658 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NHIBC94 Q25 Natl health ins, Bill Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 1155 42.4 79.7 79.7 2 227 8.3 15.7 95.3 3 25 .9 1.7 97.0 4 5 .2 .3 97.4 5 3 .1 .2 97.6 6 7 .3 .5 98.1 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 28 1.0 1.9 100.0 . 1259 46.2 Missing NOT SURE 8 16 .6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1450 Missing cases 1275 NHIHRP94 Q25 Natl health ins, H Ross Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 17 .6 2.2 2.2 2 50 1.8 6.4 8.6 3 91 3.3 11.7 20.2 4 75 2.8 9.6 29.8 5 78 2.9 10.0 39.8 6 223 8.2 28.6 68.4 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 247 9.1 31.6 100.0 . 1382 50.7 Missing NOT SURE 8 562 20.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 781 Missing cases 1944 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NHIBD94 Q25 Natl health ins, Bob Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 14 .5 1.1 1.1 2 53 1.9 4.2 5.3 3 137 5.0 10.9 16.2 4 48 1.8 3.8 20.0 5 141 5.2 11.2 31.2 6 408 15.0 32.4 63.6 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 458 16.8 36.4 100.0 . 1333 48.9 Missing NOT SURE 8 133 4.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1259 Missing cases 1466 NHIDP94 Q25 Natl health ins, Dem party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 495 18.2 37.4 37.4 2 522 19.2 39.5 76.9 3 225 8.3 17.0 93.9 4 33 1.2 2.5 96.4 5 15 .6 1.1 97.5 6 12 .4 .9 98.4 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 21 .8 1.6 100.0 . 1340 49.2 Missing NOT SURE 8 62 2.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1323 Missing cases 1402 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NHIRP94 Q25 Natl health ins, Rep party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 10 .4 .8 .8 2 50 1.8 3.9 4.7 3 99 3.6 7.7 12.3 4 38 1.4 2.9 15.3 5 139 5.1 10.8 26.1 6 471 17.3 36.5 62.6 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 482 17.7 37.4 100.0 . 1333 48.9 Missing NOT SURE 8 103 3.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1289 Missing cases 1436 NHIDH94 Q25 Natl health ins, Dem hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 403 14.8 36.8 36.8 2 417 15.3 38.1 75.0 3 176 6.5 16.1 91.0 4 29 1.1 2.7 93.7 5 26 1.0 2.4 96.1 6 22 .8 2.0 98.1 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 21 .8 1.9 100.0 . 1399 51.3 Missing NOT SURE 8 232 8.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1094 Missing cases 1631 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NHIRH94 Q25 Natl health ins, Rep hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 9 .3 .8 .8 2 35 1.3 3.1 3.8 3 80 2.9 7.0 10.8 4 42 1.5 3.7 14.5 5 113 4.1 9.9 24.4 6 379 13.9 33.1 57.5 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 486 17.8 42.5 100.0 . 1346 49.4 Missing NOT SURE 8 235 8.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1144 Missing cases 1581 DEFBC94 Q25 Budget deficit, Bill Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 283 10.4 22.3 22.3 2 397 14.6 31.3 53.6 3 259 9.5 20.4 74.1 4 49 1.8 3.9 77.9 5 65 2.4 5.1 83.0 6 143 5.2 11.3 94.3 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 72 2.6 5.7 100.0 . 1321 48.5 Missing NOT SURE 8 136 5.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1268 Missing cases 1457 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEFHRP94 Q25 Budget deficit, H Ross Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 212 7.8 24.5 24.5 2 237 8.7 27.3 51.8 3 119 4.4 13.7 65.5 4 45 1.7 5.2 70.7 5 47 1.7 5.4 76.1 6 117 4.3 13.5 89.6 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 90 3.3 10.4 100.0 . 1404 51.5 Missing NOT SURE 8 454 16.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 867 Missing cases 1858 DEFBD94 Q25 Budget deficit, Bob Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 112 4.1 10.2 10.2 2 209 7.7 19.0 29.2 3 160 5.9 14.6 43.8 4 59 2.2 5.4 49.1 5 118 4.3 10.7 59.9 6 262 9.6 23.8 83.7 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 179 6.6 16.3 100.0 . 1385 50.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 241 8.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1099 Missing cases 1626 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEFDP94 Q25 Budget deficit, Dem party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 182 6.7 16.0 16.0 2 306 11.2 26.8 42.8 3 268 9.8 23.5 66.3 4 67 2.5 5.9 72.1 5 87 3.2 7.6 79.8 6 153 5.6 13.4 93.2 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 78 2.9 6.8 100.0 . 1380 50.6 Missing NOT SURE 8 204 7.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1141 Missing cases 1584 DEFRP94 Q25 Budget deficit, Rep party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 118 4.3 10.5 10.5 2 203 7.4 18.0 28.5 3 156 5.7 13.8 42.3 4 61 2.2 5.4 47.7 5 123 4.5 10.9 58.6 6 253 9.3 22.4 81.0 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 214 7.9 19.0 100.0 . 1383 50.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 214 7.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1128 Missing cases 1597 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEFDH94 Q25 Budget deficit, Dem hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 156 5.7 16.4 16.4 2 250 9.2 26.2 42.6 3 217 8.0 22.7 65.3 4 53 1.9 5.6 70.9 5 70 2.6 7.3 78.2 6 145 5.3 15.2 93.4 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 63 2.3 6.6 100.0 . 1449 53.2 Missing NOT SURE 8 322 11.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 954 Missing cases 1771 DEFRH94 Q25 Budget deficit, Rep hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 95 3.5 9.4 9.4 2 191 7.0 18.8 28.2 3 127 4.7 12.5 40.7 4 50 1.8 4.9 45.7 5 83 3.0 8.2 53.8 6 232 8.5 22.9 76.7 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 236 8.7 23.3 100.0 . 1404 51.5 Missing NOT SURE 8 307 11.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1014 Missing cases 1711 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMPBC94 Q25 Limit foreign import, Bill Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 106 3.9 9.5 9.5 2 231 8.5 20.7 30.2 3 162 5.9 14.5 44.7 4 66 2.4 5.9 50.6 5 105 3.9 9.4 60.0 6 280 10.3 25.1 85.0 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 167 6.1 15.0 100.0 . 1339 49.1 Missing NOT SURE 8 269 9.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1117 Missing cases 1608 IMPHRP94 Q25 Limit foreign import, H Ross Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 289 10.6 32.7 32.7 2 288 10.6 32.5 65.2 3 94 3.4 10.6 75.8 4 39 1.4 4.4 80.2 5 38 1.4 4.3 84.5 6 64 2.3 7.2 91.8 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 73 2.7 8.2 100.0 . 1400 51.4 Missing NOT SURE 8 440 16.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 885 Missing cases 1840 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMPBD94 Q25 Limit foreign import, Bob Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 51 1.9 5.5 5.5 2 160 5.9 17.3 22.8 3 152 5.6 16.4 39.2 4 104 3.8 11.2 50.5 5 116 4.3 12.5 63.0 6 204 7.5 22.1 85.1 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 138 5.1 14.9 100.0 . 1398 51.3 Missing NOT SURE 8 402 14.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 925 Missing cases 1800 IMPDP94 Q25 Limit foreign import, Dem party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 123 4.5 12.4 12.4 2 276 10.1 27.9 40.4 3 214 7.9 21.7 62.0 4 83 3.0 8.4 70.4 5 84 3.1 8.5 78.9 6 132 4.8 13.4 92.3 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 76 2.8 7.7 100.0 . 1398 51.3 Missing NOT SURE 8 339 12.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 988 Missing cases 1737 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMPRP94 Q25 Limit foreign import, Rep party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 57 2.1 6.0 6.0 2 181 6.6 18.9 24.9 3 136 5.0 14.2 39.1 4 81 3.0 8.5 47.6 5 128 4.7 13.4 61.0 6 243 8.9 25.4 86.4 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 130 4.8 13.6 100.0 . 1407 51.6 Missing NOT SURE 8 362 13.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 956 Missing cases 1769 IMPDH94 Q25 Limit foreign import, Dem hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 116 4.3 14.6 14.6 2 215 7.9 27.1 41.7 3 164 6.0 20.7 62.3 4 62 2.3 7.8 70.2 5 51 1.9 6.4 76.6 6 109 4.0 13.7 90.3 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 77 2.8 9.7 100.0 . 1453 53.3 Missing NOT SURE 8 478 17.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 794 Missing cases 1931 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMPRH94 Q25 Limit foreign import, Rep hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 55 2.0 6.8 6.8 2 151 5.5 18.6 25.3 3 114 4.2 14.0 39.3 4 73 2.7 9.0 48.3 5 106 3.9 13.0 61.3 6 193 7.1 23.7 85.0 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 122 4.5 15.0 100.0 . 1411 51.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 500 18.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 814 Missing cases 1911 LCBC94 Q26 Political philosophy, Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 365 13.4 25.6 25.6 LIBERAL 2 540 19.8 37.8 63.4 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 317 11.6 22.2 85.6 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 167 6.1 11.7 97.3 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 26 1.0 1.8 99.1 CONSERVATIVE 6 9 .3 .6 99.7 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 4 .1 .3 100.0 . 1255 46.1 Missing NOT SURE 8 42 1.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1428 Missing cases 1297 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCHRP94 Q26 Political philosophy, Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 17 .6 1.4 1.4 LIBERAL 2 39 1.4 3.3 4.7 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 81 3.0 6.8 11.6 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 161 5.9 13.6 25.1 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 205 7.5 17.3 42.4 CONSERVATIVE 6 447 16.4 37.7 80.1 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 236 8.7 19.9 100.0 . 1307 48.0 Missing NOT SURE 8 232 8.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1186 Missing cases 1539 LCBD94 Q26 Political philosophy, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 6 .2 .4 .4 LIBERAL 2 9 .3 .7 1.1 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 14 .5 1.0 2.1 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 82 3.0 6.0 8.2 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 211 7.7 15.5 23.7 CONSERVATIVE 6 745 27.3 54.8 78.5 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 293 10.8 21.5 100.0 . 1297 47.6 Missing NOT SURE 8 68 2.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1360 Missing cases 1365 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCJK94 Q26 Political philosophy, Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 7 .3 .6 .6 LIBERAL 2 18 .7 1.5 2.1 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 26 1.0 2.2 4.4 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 79 2.9 6.8 11.2 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 214 7.9 18.4 29.5 CONSERVATIVE 6 577 21.2 49.5 79.1 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 244 9.0 20.9 100.0 . 1352 49.6 Missing NOT SURE 8 208 7.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1165 Missing cases 1560 LCBK94 Q26 Political philosophy, Kerry Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 54 2.0 5.8 5.8 LIBERAL 2 223 8.2 23.9 29.7 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 259 9.5 27.8 57.4 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 197 7.2 21.1 78.6 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 100 3.7 10.7 89.3 CONSERVATIVE 6 71 2.6 7.6 96.9 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 29 1.1 3.1 100.0 . 1402 51.4 Missing NOT SURE 8 390 14.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 933 Missing cases 1792 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCDQ94 Q26 Political philosophy, Quayle Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 7 .3 .5 .5 LIBERAL 2 12 .4 .9 1.5 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 10 .4 .8 2.3 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 32 1.2 2.5 4.7 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 76 2.8 5.9 10.6 CONSERVATIVE 6 527 19.3 40.9 51.6 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 624 22.9 48.4 100.0 . 1325 48.6 Missing NOT SURE 8 112 4.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1288 Missing cases 1437 LCAV94 Q26 Political philosophy, avg voter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 3 .1 .2 .2 LIBERAL 2 17 .6 1.3 1.5 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 67 2.5 5.0 6.6 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 418 15.3 31.5 38.0 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 557 20.4 41.9 80.0 CONSERVATIVE 6 251 9.2 18.9 98.9 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 15 .6 1.1 100.0 . 1318 48.4 Missing NOT SURE 8 79 2.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1328 Missing cases 1397 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCDP94 Q26 Political philosophy, Dem party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 224 8.2 16.2 16.2 LIBERAL 2 584 21.4 42.3 58.6 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 401 14.7 29.1 87.6 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 121 4.4 8.8 96.4 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 34 1.2 2.5 98.8 CONSERVATIVE 6 15 .6 1.1 99.9 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 1 .0 .1 100.0 . 1300 47.7 Missing NOT SURE 8 45 1.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1380 Missing cases 1345 LCRP94 Q26 Political philosophy, Rep party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 6 .2 .4 .4 LIBERAL 2 7 .3 .5 1.0 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 10 .4 .7 1.7 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 36 1.3 2.6 4.3 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 228 8.4 16.8 21.1 CONSERVATIVE 6 764 28.0 56.2 77.3 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 309 11.3 22.7 100.0 . 1303 47.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 62 2.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1360 Missing cases 1365 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCUWS94 Q26 Political philosophy, United We Stan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 9 .3 1.2 1.2 LIBERAL 2 12 .4 1.6 2.9 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 32 1.2 4.3 7.2 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 86 3.2 11.7 18.9 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 140 5.1 19.0 37.9 CONSERVATIVE 6 249 9.1 33.8 71.7 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 208 7.6 28.3 100.0 . 1416 52.0 Missing NOT SURE 8 573 21.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 736 Missing cases 1989 LCDH94 Q26 Political philosophy, Dem hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 190 7.0 16.1 16.1 LIBERAL 2 480 17.6 40.8 56.9 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 304 11.2 25.8 82.8 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 138 5.1 11.7 94.5 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 44 1.6 3.7 98.2 CONSERVATIVE 6 17 .6 1.4 99.7 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 4 .1 .3 100.0 . 1388 50.9 Missing NOT SURE 8 160 5.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1177 Missing cases 1548 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCRH94 Q26 Political philosophy, Rep hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 8 .3 .6 .6 LIBERAL 2 8 .3 .6 1.3 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 13 .5 1.0 2.3 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 59 2.2 4.7 7.0 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 180 6.6 14.4 21.5 CONSERVATIVE 6 640 23.5 51.2 72.7 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 341 12.5 27.3 100.0 . 1334 49.0 Missing NOT SURE 8 142 5.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1249 Missing cases 1476 LCDS94 Q26 Political philosophy, Dem Senate can Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 148 5.4 16.5 16.5 LIBERAL 2 326 12.0 36.4 53.0 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 207 7.6 23.1 76.1 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 171 6.3 19.1 95.2 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 31 1.1 3.5 98.7 CONSERVATIVE 6 12 .4 1.3 100.0 . 1743 64.0 Missing NOT SURE 8 87 3.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 895 Missing cases 1830 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCRS94 Q26 Political philosophy, Rep Senate can Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 6 .2 .7 .7 LIBERAL 2 8 .3 .9 1.6 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 4 .1 .4 2.0 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 37 1.4 4.1 6.1 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 71 2.6 7.9 14.1 CONSERVATIVE 6 368 13.5 41.1 55.1 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 402 14.8 44.9 100.0 . 1738 63.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 91 3.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 896 Missing cases 1829 LCDG94 Q26 Political philosophy, Dem gub cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 208 7.6 25.1 25.1 LIBERAL 2 322 11.8 38.8 63.9 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 175 6.4 21.1 84.9 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 88 3.2 10.6 95.5 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 17 .6 2.0 97.6 CONSERVATIVE 6 15 .6 1.8 99.4 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 5 .2 .6 100.0 . 1814 66.6 Missing NOT SURE 8 81 3.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 830 Missing cases 1895 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCRG94 Q26 Political philosophy, Rep gub cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 5 .2 .6 .6 LIBERAL 2 10 .4 1.2 1.8 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 9 .3 1.1 2.8 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 44 1.6 5.1 8.0 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 104 3.8 12.2 20.1 CONSERVATIVE 6 475 17.4 55.6 75.7 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 208 7.6 24.3 100.0 . 1787 65.6 Missing NOT SURE 8 83 3.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 855 Missing cases 1870 HLPBC94 Q27 Can help state/district, Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 79 2.9 5.8 5.8 2 291 10.7 21.5 27.4 3 415 15.2 30.7 58.1 4 185 6.8 13.7 71.8 POOR 5 381 14.0 28.2 100.0 . 1291 47.4 Missing NOT SURE 6 83 3.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1351 Missing cases 1374 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HLPHRP94 Q27 Can help state/district, Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 9 .3 .9 .9 2 61 2.2 6.0 6.8 3 187 6.9 18.3 25.1 4 235 8.6 23.0 48.1 POOR 5 531 19.5 51.9 100.0 . 1325 48.6 Missing NOT SURE 6 377 13.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1023 Missing cases 1702 HLPBD94 Q27 Can help state/district, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 56 2.1 4.5 4.5 2 243 8.9 19.4 23.9 3 439 16.1 35.1 59.0 4 198 7.3 15.8 74.9 POOR 5 314 11.5 25.1 100.0 . 1319 48.4 Missing NOT SURE 6 156 5.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1250 Missing cases 1475 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HLPDP94 Q27 Can help state/district, Dem party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 45 1.7 3.4 3.4 2 287 10.5 21.8 25.3 3 449 16.5 34.2 59.4 4 221 8.1 16.8 76.3 POOR 5 312 11.4 23.7 100.0 . 1330 48.8 Missing NOT SURE 6 81 3.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1314 Missing cases 1411 HLPRP94 Q27 Can help state/district, Rep party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 52 1.9 4.0 4.0 2 332 12.2 25.6 29.6 3 425 15.6 32.8 62.4 4 218 8.0 16.8 79.2 POOR 5 270 9.9 20.8 100.0 . 1327 48.7 Missing NOT SURE 6 101 3.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1297 Missing cases 1428 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HLPDH94 Q27 Can help state/district, Dem hse can Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 106 3.9 9.1 9.1 2 302 11.1 25.9 35.0 3 325 11.9 27.8 62.8 4 169 6.2 14.5 77.3 POOR 5 265 9.7 22.7 100.0 . 1414 51.9 Missing NOT SURE 6 144 5.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1167 Missing cases 1558 HLPRH94 Q27 Can help state/district, Rep hse can Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 84 3.1 7.0 7.0 2 332 12.2 27.6 34.6 3 329 12.1 27.3 61.9 4 172 6.3 14.3 76.2 POOR 5 287 10.5 23.8 100.0 . 1369 50.2 Missing NOT SURE 6 152 5.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1204 Missing cases 1521 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HLPDS94 Q27 Can help state/district, Dem Senate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 61 2.2 6.9 6.9 2 251 9.2 28.5 35.4 3 284 10.4 32.2 67.7 4 100 3.7 11.4 79.0 POOR 5 185 6.8 21.0 100.0 . 1747 64.1 Missing NOT SURE 6 97 3.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 881 Missing cases 1844 HLPRS94 Q27 Can help state/district, Rep Senate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 67 2.5 7.9 7.9 2 210 7.7 24.8 32.7 3 173 6.3 20.4 53.2 4 113 4.1 13.4 66.5 POOR 5 283 10.4 33.5 100.0 . 1759 64.6 Missing NOT SURE 6 120 4.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 846 Missing cases 1879 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HLPDG94 Q27 Can help state/district, Dem gub can Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 42 1.5 5.2 5.2 2 186 6.8 22.9 28.1 3 224 8.2 27.6 55.7 4 125 4.6 15.4 71.1 POOR 5 235 8.6 28.9 100.0 . 1823 66.9 Missing NOT SURE 6 90 3.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 812 Missing cases 1913 HLPRG94 Q27 Can help state/district, Rep gub can Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 121 4.4 14.2 14.2 2 252 9.2 29.6 43.8 3 201 7.4 23.6 67.5 4 117 4.3 13.7 81.2 POOR 5 160 5.9 18.8 100.0 . 1788 65.6 Missing NOT SURE 6 86 3.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 851 Missing cases 1874 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CARBC94 Q27 Cares about people like me, Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 231 8.5 16.2 16.2 2 359 13.2 25.2 41.4 3 303 11.1 21.2 62.6 4 165 6.1 11.6 74.2 POOR 5 368 13.5 25.8 100.0 . 1263 46.3 Missing NOT SURE 6 36 1.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1426 Missing cases 1299 CARHRP94 Q27 Cares about people like me, Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 23 .8 1.9 1.9 2 122 4.5 10.3 12.3 3 380 13.9 32.1 44.4 4 247 9.1 20.9 65.3 POOR 5 411 15.1 34.7 100.0 . 1304 47.9 Missing NOT SURE 6 238 8.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1183 Missing cases 1542 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CARBD94 Q27 Cares about people like me, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 45 1.7 3.3 3.3 2 243 8.9 18.0 21.3 3 452 16.6 33.4 54.7 4 243 8.9 18.0 72.7 POOR 5 370 13.6 27.3 100.0 . 1298 47.6 Missing NOT SURE 6 74 2.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1353 Missing cases 1372 CARDP94 Q27 Cares about people like me, Dem part Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 83 3.0 6.0 6.0 2 349 12.8 25.2 31.1 3 424 15.6 30.6 61.7 4 202 7.4 14.6 76.3 POOR 5 329 12.1 23.7 100.0 . 1292 47.4 Missing NOT SURE 6 46 1.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1387 Missing cases 1338 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CARRP94 Q27 Cares about people like me, Rep part Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 48 1.8 3.5 3.5 2 291 10.7 21.4 24.9 3 367 13.5 27.0 51.9 4 253 9.3 18.6 70.5 POOR 5 402 14.8 29.5 100.0 . 1306 47.9 Missing NOT SURE 6 58 2.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1361 Missing cases 1364 CARDH94 Q27 Cares about people like me, Dem hse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 117 4.3 9.7 9.7 2 313 11.5 26.0 35.7 3 348 12.8 28.9 64.6 4 146 5.4 12.1 76.7 POOR 5 280 10.3 23.3 100.0 . 1394 51.2 Missing NOT SURE 6 127 4.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1204 Missing cases 1521 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CARRH94 Q27 Cares about people like me, Rep hse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 83 3.0 6.7 6.7 2 314 11.5 25.2 31.8 3 324 11.9 26.0 57.8 4 171 6.3 13.7 71.5 POOR 5 355 13.0 28.5 100.0 . 1341 49.2 Missing NOT SURE 6 137 5.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1247 Missing cases 1478 CARDS94 Q27 Cares about people like me, Dem Sena Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 60 2.2 6.5 6.5 2 244 9.0 26.5 33.0 3 277 10.2 30.0 63.0 4 107 3.9 11.6 74.6 POOR 5 234 8.6 25.4 100.0 . 1737 63.7 Missing NOT SURE 6 66 2.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 922 Missing cases 1803 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CARRS94 Q27 Cares about people like me, Rep Sena Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 77 2.8 8.7 8.7 2 178 6.5 20.1 28.8 3 179 6.6 20.2 49.0 4 130 4.8 14.7 63.7 POOR 5 321 11.8 36.3 100.0 . 1754 64.4 Missing NOT SURE 6 86 3.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 885 Missing cases 1840 CARDG94 Q27 Cares about people like me, Dem gub Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 72 2.6 8.5 8.5 2 204 7.5 24.0 32.5 3 247 9.1 29.1 61.5 4 100 3.7 11.8 73.3 POOR 5 227 8.3 26.7 100.0 . 1811 66.5 Missing NOT SURE 6 64 2.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 850 Missing cases 1875 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CARRG94 Q27 Cares about people like me, Rep gub Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 88 3.2 10.1 10.1 2 233 8.6 26.7 36.8 3 206 7.6 23.6 60.4 4 129 4.7 14.8 75.2 POOR 5 216 7.9 24.8 100.0 . 1789 65.7 Missing NOT SURE 6 64 2.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 872 Missing cases 1853 ECNBC94 Q27 Ability to solve econ prob, Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 115 4.2 8.0 8.0 2 328 12.0 22.9 30.9 3 320 11.7 22.3 53.2 4 188 6.9 13.1 66.4 POOR 5 482 17.7 33.6 100.0 . 1261 46.3 Missing NOT SURE 6 31 1.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1433 Missing cases 1292 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ECNHRP94 Q27 Ability to solve econ prob, Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 19 .7 1.6 1.6 2 137 5.0 11.8 13.5 3 235 8.6 20.3 33.7 4 217 8.0 18.7 52.5 POOR 5 551 20.2 47.5 100.0 . 1302 47.8 Missing NOT SURE 6 264 9.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1159 Missing cases 1566 ECNBD94 Q27 Ability to solve econ prob, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 35 1.3 2.7 2.7 2 277 10.2 21.1 23.8 3 454 16.7 34.6 58.4 4 252 9.2 19.2 77.6 POOR 5 294 10.8 22.4 100.0 . 1291 47.4 Missing NOT SURE 6 122 4.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1312 Missing cases 1413 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ECNDP94 Q27 Ability to solve econ prob, Dem part Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 44 1.6 3.2 3.2 2 216 7.9 15.9 19.2 3 392 14.4 28.9 48.1 4 258 9.5 19.0 67.1 POOR 5 446 16.4 32.9 100.0 . 1307 48.0 Missing NOT SURE 6 62 2.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1356 Missing cases 1369 ECNRP94 Q27 Ability to solve econ prob, Rep part Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 46 1.7 3.4 3.4 2 318 11.7 23.7 27.2 3 384 14.1 28.7 55.9 4 266 9.8 19.9 75.7 POOR 5 325 11.9 24.3 100.0 . 1301 47.7 Missing NOT SURE 6 85 3.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1339 Missing cases 1386 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ECNDH94 Q27 Ability to solve econ prob, Dem hse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 52 1.9 4.4 4.4 2 226 8.3 19.3 23.8 3 343 12.6 29.3 53.1 4 181 6.6 15.5 68.6 POOR 5 367 13.5 31.4 100.0 . 1405 51.6 Missing NOT SURE 6 151 5.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1169 Missing cases 1556 ECNRH94 Q27 Ability to solve econ prob, Rep hse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 62 2.3 5.2 5.2 2 286 10.5 23.9 29.1 3 329 12.1 27.5 56.6 4 185 6.8 15.5 72.0 POOR 5 335 12.3 28.0 100.0 . 1354 49.7 Missing NOT SURE 6 174 6.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1197 Missing cases 1528 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ECNDS94 Q27 Ability to solve econ prob, Dem Sena Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 46 1.7 5.1 5.1 2 192 7.0 21.4 26.6 3 275 10.1 30.7 57.3 4 115 4.2 12.8 70.1 POOR 5 268 9.8 29.9 100.0 . 1758 64.5 Missing NOT SURE 6 71 2.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 896 Missing cases 1829 ECNRS94 Q27 Ability to solve econ prob, Rep Sena Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 66 2.4 7.7 7.7 2 181 6.6 21.0 28.7 3 181 6.6 21.0 49.7 4 121 4.4 14.1 63.8 POOR 5 312 11.4 36.2 100.0 . 1769 64.9 Missing NOT SURE 6 95 3.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 861 Missing cases 1864 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ECNDG94 Q27 Ability to solve econ prob, Dem gub Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 29 1.1 3.7 3.7 2 128 4.7 16.2 19.8 3 231 8.5 29.2 49.0 4 115 4.2 14.5 63.5 POOR 5 289 10.6 36.5 100.0 . 1841 67.6 Missing NOT SURE 6 92 3.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 792 Missing cases 1933 ECNRG94 Q27 Ability to solve econ prob, Rep gub Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 90 3.3 10.9 10.9 2 216 7.9 26.2 37.1 3 196 7.2 23.8 60.9 4 120 4.4 14.6 75.5 POOR 5 202 7.4 24.5 100.0 . 1823 66.9 Missing NOT SURE 6 78 2.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 824 Missing cases 1901 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVABC94 Q27 Overall evaluation, Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 149 5.5 10.1 10.1 2 400 14.7 27.1 37.2 3 265 9.7 18.0 55.2 4 172 6.3 11.7 66.8 POOR 5 489 17.9 33.2 100.0 . 1245 45.7 Missing NOT SURE 6 5 .2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1475 Missing cases 1250 EVAHRP94 Q27 Overall evaluation, Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 13 .5 1.1 1.1 2 76 2.8 6.2 7.3 3 229 8.4 18.7 25.9 4 277 10.2 22.6 48.5 POOR 5 632 23.2 51.5 100.0 . 1288 47.3 Missing NOT SURE 6 210 7.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1227 Missing cases 1498 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVABD94 Q27 Overall evaluation, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 54 2.0 3.9 3.9 2 313 11.5 22.5 26.4 3 424 15.6 30.5 56.9 4 262 9.6 18.8 75.8 POOR 5 337 12.4 24.2 100.0 . 1274 46.8 Missing NOT SURE 6 61 2.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1390 Missing cases 1335 EVADQ94 Q27 Overall evaluation, Quayle Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 76 2.8 5.6 5.6 2 239 8.8 17.5 23.1 3 266 9.8 19.5 42.6 4 200 7.3 14.7 57.3 POOR 5 582 21.4 42.7 100.0 . 1289 47.3 Missing NOT SURE 6 73 2.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1363 Missing cases 1362 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVAJK94 Q27 Overall evaluation, Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 79 2.9 6.4 6.4 2 268 9.8 21.7 28.1 3 442 16.2 35.8 63.9 4 231 8.5 18.7 82.6 POOR 5 215 7.9 17.4 100.0 . 1310 48.1 Missing NOT SURE 6 180 6.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1235 Missing cases 1490 EVARL94 Q27 Overall evaluation, Limbaugh Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 142 5.2 10.8 10.8 2 151 5.5 11.4 22.2 3 152 5.6 11.5 33.7 4 95 3.5 7.2 40.9 POOR 5 779 28.6 59.1 100.0 . 1288 47.3 Missing NOT SURE 6 118 4.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1319 Missing cases 1406 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVAON94 Q27 Overall evaluation, North Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 76 2.8 5.6 5.6 2 110 4.0 8.1 13.8 3 160 5.9 11.8 25.6 4 132 4.8 9.8 35.4 POOR 5 873 32.0 64.6 100.0 . 1290 47.3 Missing NOT SURE 6 84 3.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1351 Missing cases 1374 EVAJJ94 Q27 Overall evaluation, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 32 1.2 2.3 2.3 2 147 5.4 10.8 13.1 3 291 10.7 21.3 34.4 4 275 10.1 20.1 54.5 POOR 5 621 22.8 45.5 100.0 . 1290 47.3 Missing NOT SURE 6 69 2.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1366 Missing cases 1359 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVAAG94 Q27 Overall evaluation, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 145 5.3 10.3 10.3 2 380 13.9 27.1 37.4 3 308 11.3 22.0 59.4 4 197 7.2 14.0 73.4 POOR 5 373 13.7 26.6 100.0 . 1285 47.2 Missing NOT SURE 6 37 1.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1403 Missing cases 1322 EVAHC94 Q27 Overall evaluation, Hillary Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 169 6.2 12.0 12.0 2 319 11.7 22.7 34.7 3 241 8.8 17.1 51.8 4 140 5.1 10.0 61.8 POOR 5 537 19.7 38.2 100.0 . 1274 46.8 Missing NOT SURE 6 45 1.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1406 Missing cases 1319 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVAPR94 Q27 Overall evaluation, Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 27 1.0 2.1 2.1 2 76 2.8 5.8 7.8 3 172 6.3 13.1 20.9 4 198 7.3 15.1 36.0 POOR 5 841 30.9 64.0 100.0 . 1291 47.4 Missing NOT SURE 6 120 4.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1314 Missing cases 1411 EVACP94 Q27 Overall evaluation, Powell Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 140 5.1 11.9 11.9 2 412 15.1 35.0 46.9 3 418 15.3 35.5 82.4 4 116 4.3 9.9 92.3 POOR 5 91 3.3 7.7 100.0 . 1299 47.7 Missing NOT SURE 6 249 9.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1177 Missing cases 1548 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVABK94 Q27 Overall evaluation, Kerrey Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 36 1.3 3.5 3.5 2 209 7.7 20.0 23.5 3 412 15.1 39.5 63.0 4 210 7.7 20.1 83.1 POOR 5 176 6.5 16.9 100.0 . 1334 49.0 Missing NOT SURE 6 348 12.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1043 Missing cases 1682 EVAJB94 Q27 Overall evaluation, Brown Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 127 4.7 100.0 100.0 . 2598 95.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 127 Missing cases 2598 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVAPT94 Q27 Overall evaluation, Tsongas Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 40 1.5 3.7 3.7 2 209 7.7 19.1 22.7 3 341 12.5 31.1 53.9 4 232 8.5 21.2 75.1 POOR 5 273 10.0 24.9 100.0 . 1339 49.1 Missing NOT SURE 6 291 10.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1095 Missing cases 1630 EVASN94 Q27 Overall evaluation, Nunn Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 37 1.4 3.4 3.4 2 210 7.7 19.4 22.8 3 421 15.4 38.9 61.7 4 224 8.2 20.7 82.4 POOR 5 190 7.0 17.6 100.0 . 1341 49.2 Missing NOT SURE 6 302 11.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1082 Missing cases 1643 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVADP94 Q27 Overall evaluation, Dem party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 61 2.2 4.4 4.4 2 276 10.1 19.8 24.2 3 378 13.9 27.1 51.3 4 259 9.5 18.6 69.9 POOR 5 419 15.4 30.1 100.0 . 1302 47.8 Missing NOT SURE 6 30 1.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1393 Missing cases 1332 EVARP94 Q27 Overall evaluation, Rep party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 57 2.1 4.2 4.2 2 328 12.0 24.1 28.2 3 345 12.7 25.3 53.6 4 266 9.8 19.5 73.1 POOR 5 367 13.5 26.9 100.0 . 1312 48.1 Missing NOT SURE 6 50 1.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1363 Missing cases 1362 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVADH94 Q27 Overall evaluation, Dem hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 92 3.4 7.6 7.6 2 268 9.8 22.2 29.8 3 325 11.9 26.9 56.7 4 184 6.8 15.2 71.9 POOR 5 340 12.5 28.1 100.0 . 1401 51.4 Missing NOT SURE 6 115 4.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1209 Missing cases 1516 EVARH94 Q27 Overall evaluation, Rep hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 89 3.3 7.2 7.2 2 329 12.1 26.4 33.6 3 296 10.9 23.8 57.4 4 188 6.9 15.1 72.5 POOR 5 342 12.6 27.5 100.0 . 1361 49.9 Missing NOT SURE 6 120 4.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1244 Missing cases 1481 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVADS94 Q27 Overall evaluation, Dem Senate cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 50 1.8 5.4 5.4 2 210 7.7 22.7 28.1 3 264 9.7 28.5 56.6 4 128 4.7 13.8 70.4 POOR 5 274 10.1 29.6 100.0 . 1744 64.0 Missing NOT SURE 6 55 2.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 926 Missing cases 1799 EVARS94 Q27 Overall evaluation, Rep Senate cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 81 3.0 9.1 9.1 2 184 6.8 20.6 29.7 3 153 5.6 17.2 46.9 4 112 4.1 12.6 59.4 POOR 5 362 13.3 40.6 100.0 . 1755 64.4 Missing NOT SURE 6 78 2.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 892 Missing cases 1833 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVADG94 Q27 Overall evaluation, Dem gub cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 48 1.8 5.7 5.7 2 174 6.4 20.6 26.3 3 204 7.5 24.2 50.5 4 131 4.8 15.5 66.1 POOR 5 286 10.5 33.9 100.0 . 1828 67.1 Missing NOT SURE 6 54 2.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 843 Missing cases 1882 EVARG94 Q27 Overall evaluation, Rep gub cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 124 4.6 14.2 14.2 2 219 8.0 25.1 39.4 3 188 6.9 21.6 61.0 4 113 4.1 13.0 73.9 POOR 5 227 8.3 26.1 100.0 . 1803 66.2 Missing NOT SURE 6 51 1.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 871 Missing cases 1854 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVAIND94 Q28 How favorable, independents Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1 110 4.0 8.0 8.0 2 311 11.4 22.5 30.5 3 513 18.8 37.1 67.6 4 228 8.4 16.5 84.1 UNFAVORABLE 5 220 8.1 15.9 100.0 . 1242 45.6 Missing NOT SURE 6 101 3.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1382 Missing cases 1343 EVACON94 Q28 How favorable, Congress Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1 26 1.0 1.8 1.8 2 283 10.4 19.7 21.5 3 234 8.6 16.3 37.8 4 435 16.0 30.3 68.1 UNFAVORABLE 5 459 16.8 31.9 100.0 . 1250 45.9 Missing NOT SURE 6 38 1.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1437 Missing cases 1288 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVASC94 Q28 How favorable, Supreme Court Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1 77 2.8 5.3 5.3 2 461 16.9 32.0 37.3 3 432 15.9 30.0 67.3 4 275 10.1 19.1 86.4 UNFAVORABLE 5 196 7.2 13.6 100.0 . 1242 45.6 Missing NOT SURE 6 42 1.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1441 Missing cases 1284 EVAMIL94 Q28 How favorable, military Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1 336 12.3 23.2 23.2 2 550 20.2 38.0 61.2 3 363 13.3 25.1 86.3 4 132 4.8 9.1 95.4 UNFAVORABLE 5 66 2.4 4.6 100.0 . 1246 45.7 Missing NOT SURE 6 32 1.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1447 Missing cases 1278 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVAMM94 Q28 How favorable, mass media Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1 19 .7 1.3 1.3 2 140 5.1 9.7 11.0 3 196 7.2 13.6 24.7 4 374 13.7 26.0 50.6 UNFAVORABLE 5 711 26.1 49.4 100.0 . 1248 45.8 Missing NOT SURE 6 37 1.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1440 Missing cases 1285 EVABUS94 Q28 How favorable, business corp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1 51 1.9 3.6 3.6 2 353 13.0 25.1 28.7 3 460 16.9 32.7 61.4 4 346 12.7 24.6 86.0 UNFAVORABLE 5 197 7.2 14.0 100.0 . 1255 46.1 Missing NOT SURE 6 63 2.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1407 Missing cases 1318 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALAB94 Q28 How favorable, labor unions Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1 104 3.8 7.2 7.2 2 292 10.7 20.2 27.4 3 284 10.4 19.7 47.1 4 358 13.1 24.8 71.9 UNFAVORABLE 5 405 14.9 28.1 100.0 . 1243 45.6 Missing NOT SURE 6 39 1.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1443 Missing cases 1282 EVAUWS94 Q28 How favorable, United We Stand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1 44 1.6 4.6 4.6 2 95 3.5 9.9 14.4 3 240 8.8 24.9 39.4 4 174 6.4 18.1 57.5 UNFAVORABLE 5 409 15.0 42.5 100.0 . 1297 47.6 Missing NOT SURE 6 466 17.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 962 Missing cases 1763 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVAFC94 Q28 How favorable, Fundamentalist Christ Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1 76 2.8 5.8 5.8 2 147 5.4 11.2 16.9 3 216 7.9 16.4 33.3 4 200 7.3 15.2 48.5 UNFAVORABLE 5 679 24.9 51.5 100.0 . 1269 46.6 Missing NOT SURE 6 138 5.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1318 Missing cases 1407 EVAWOM94 Q28 How favorable, womens movement Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1 114 4.2 8.3 8.3 2 325 11.9 23.6 31.9 3 326 12.0 23.7 55.6 4 214 7.9 15.5 71.1 UNFAVORABLE 5 398 14.6 28.9 100.0 . 1261 46.3 Missing NOT SURE 6 87 3.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1377 Missing cases 1348 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVAENV94 Q28 How favorable, environmentalists Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1 233 8.6 16.6 16.6 2 443 16.3 31.5 48.1 3 256 9.4 18.2 66.3 4 225 8.3 16.0 82.3 UNFAVORABLE 5 248 9.1 17.7 100.0 . 1249 45.8 Missing NOT SURE 6 71 2.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1405 Missing cases 1320 FIRM94 Q29a Better be party supporter than ind Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 101 3.7 6.9 6.9 2 271 9.9 18.6 25.5 3 346 12.7 23.8 49.3 4 464 17.0 31.9 81.2 STRONGLY AGREE 5 274 10.1 18.8 100.0 . 1215 44.6 Missing NOT SURE 6 54 2.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1456 Missing cases 1269 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SPECIA94 Q29b Special interests have power Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 56 2.1 3.9 3.9 2 267 9.8 18.4 22.3 3 173 6.3 11.9 34.2 4 621 22.8 42.9 77.1 STRONGLY AGREE 5 332 12.2 22.9 100.0 . 1220 44.8 Missing NOT SURE 6 56 2.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1449 Missing cases 1276 TRUPEO94 Q29c Most people can be trusted Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 64 2.3 4.5 4.5 2 363 13.3 25.5 30.0 3 317 11.6 22.2 52.2 4 611 22.4 42.9 95.1 STRONGLY AGREE 5 70 2.6 4.9 100.0 . 1221 44.8 Missing NOT SURE 6 79 2.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1425 Missing cases 1300 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PTYCON94 Q29d Parties confuse issues/no choice Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 55 2.0 3.7 3.7 2 339 12.4 23.1 26.9 3 186 6.8 12.7 39.5 4 623 22.9 42.5 82.0 STRONGLY AGREE 5 264 9.7 18.0 100.0 . 1217 44.7 Missing NOT SURE 6 41 1.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1467 Missing cases 1258 EQUAL94 Q29e Everyone have equal opportunity Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 98 3.6 6.8 6.8 2 213 7.8 14.7 21.5 3 188 6.9 13.0 34.5 4 581 21.3 40.1 74.6 STRONGLY AGREE 5 368 13.5 25.4 100.0 . 1221 44.8 Missing NOT SURE 6 56 2.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1448 Missing cases 1277 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BETTER94 Q29f I am better informed than most Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 19 .7 1.4 1.4 2 120 4.4 8.7 10.1 3 323 11.9 23.5 33.6 4 581 21.3 42.2 75.8 STRONGLY AGREE 5 333 12.2 24.2 100.0 . 1220 44.8 Missing NOT SURE 6 129 4.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1376 Missing cases 1349 RADICA94 Q29g Government needs radical change Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 68 2.5 4.7 4.7 2 321 11.8 22.4 27.1 3 236 8.7 16.5 43.6 4 495 18.2 34.5 78.2 STRONGLY AGREE 5 313 11.5 21.8 100.0 . 1225 45.0 Missing NOT SURE 6 67 2.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1433 Missing cases 1292 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LOOKOU94 Q29h People looking out for themselves Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 20 .7 1.4 1.4 2 156 5.7 10.6 11.9 3 190 7.0 12.9 24.8 4 832 30.5 56.5 81.3 STRONGLY AGREE 5 275 10.1 18.7 100.0 . 1219 44.7 Missing NOT SURE 6 33 1.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1473 Missing cases 1252 WELREP94 Q29i People like me well represented Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 177 6.5 12.7 12.7 2 591 21.7 42.4 55.1 3 302 11.1 21.7 76.8 4 275 10.1 19.7 96.5 STRONGLY AGREE 5 49 1.8 3.5 100.0 . 1221 44.8 Missing NOT SURE 6 110 4.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1394 Missing cases 1331 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FAMTIE94 Q29j More emphasis on family ties Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 57 2.1 3.9 3.9 2 126 4.6 8.6 12.5 3 189 6.9 12.9 25.4 4 569 20.9 38.9 64.4 STRONGLY AGREE 5 521 19.1 35.6 100.0 . 1210 44.4 Missing NOT SURE 6 53 1.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1462 Missing cases 1263 WRDGOD94 Q29k Bible is actual word of God Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 460 16.9 32.1 32.1 2 371 13.6 25.9 57.9 3 229 8.4 16.0 73.9 4 190 7.0 13.2 87.1 STRONGLY AGREE 5 185 6.8 12.9 100.0 . 1222 44.8 Missing NOT SURE 6 68 2.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1435 Missing cases 1290 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RIDPTY94 Q29l More efficient if rid of parties Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 462 17.0 34.1 34.1 2 577 21.2 42.6 76.6 3 153 5.6 11.3 87.9 4 81 3.0 6.0 93.9 STRONGLY AGREE 5 83 3.0 6.1 100.0 . 1213 44.5 Missing NOT SURE 6 156 5.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1356 Missing cases 1369 SEX94 Q30 What is your sex Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MALE 1 813 29.8 53.2 53.2 FEMALE 2 714 26.2 46.8 100.0 . 1198 44.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1527 Missing cases 1198 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INCOME94 Q31 What was your income last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNDER 20,000 1 206 7.6 14.0 14.0 20,000 - 39,999 2 475 17.4 32.2 46.2 40,000 - 59,999 3 345 12.7 23.4 69.7 60,000 - 79,999 4 204 7.5 13.8 83.5 80,000 - 99,999 5 114 4.2 7.7 91.2 OVER 100,000 6 129 4.7 8.8 100.0 . 1252 45.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1473 Missing cases 1252 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - VET94 Q32 Are you or your spouse a veteran Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 810 29.7 52.9 52.9 NO 2 722 26.5 47.1 100.0 . 1193 43.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1532 Missing cases 1193 WWII94 Q33 If yes, World War II Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2286 83.9 83.9 83.9 CHECKED 1 439 16.1 16.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - KOREA94 Q33 If yes, Korea Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2521 92.5 92.5 92.5 CHECKED 1 204 7.5 7.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - VIET94 Q33 If yes, Vietnam Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2603 95.5 95.5 95.5 CHECKED 1 122 4.5 4.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 PGULF94 Q33 If yes, Persian Gulf Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 2722 99.9 99.9 99.9 CHECKED 1 3 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - REL94 Q34 What is your religious preference Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CATHOLIC 1 304 11.2 20.0 20.0 PROTESTANT 2 859 31.5 56.5 76.5 JEWISH 3 20 .7 1.3 77.8 BAPTIST 4 158 5.8 10.4 88.2 NO PREFERENCE 5 108 4.0 7.1 95.3 OTHER 6 72 2.6 4.7 100.0 . 1204 44.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1521 Missing cases 1204 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BNAG94 Q35 Do you consider self born-again Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 398 14.6 26.6 26.6 NO 2 1101 40.4 73.4 100.0 . 1226 45.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1499 Missing cases 1226 CHRIST94 Q36 Do you consider self fundamentalist Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 219 8.0 15.1 15.1 NO 2 1232 45.2 84.9 100.0 . 1274 46.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1451 Missing cases 1274 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONTH94 Q37 Month of todays date Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 1 .0 .1 .1 1 150 5.5 9.9 10.0 2 14 .5 .9 10.9 3 4 .1 .3 11.2 5 2 .1 .1 11.3 6 1 .0 .1 11.4 9 1 .0 .1 11.5 10 5 .2 .3 11.8 11 1210 44.4 80.2 92.0 12 116 4.3 7.7 99.7 14 1 .0 .1 99.8 15 1 .0 .1 99.9 19 2 .1 .1 100.0 . 1217 44.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1508 Missing cases 1217 DAY94 Q37 Day of todays date Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 1 .0 .1 .1 1 19 .7 1.3 1.3 2 11 .4 .7 2.1 3 8 .3 .5 2.6 4 12 .4 .8 3.4 5 12 .4 .8 4.2 6 10 .4 .7 4.9 7 12 .4 .8 5.7 8 7 .3 .5 6.1 9 6 .2 .4 6.5 10 3 .1 .2 6.7 11 6 .2 .4 7.1 12 23 .8 1.5 8.6 13 28 1.0 1.9 10.5 14 376 13.8 25.0 35.5 15 214 7.9 14.2 49.7 16 128 4.7 8.5 58.2 17 89 3.3 5.9 64.2 18 88 3.2 5.9 70.0 19 54 2.0 3.6 73.6 20 41 1.5 2.7 76.3 21 48 1.8 3.2 79.5 22 39 1.4 2.6 82.1 23 32 1.2 2.1 84.2 24 26 1.0 1.7 86.0 25 28 1.0 1.9 87.8 26 36 1.3 2.4 90.2 27 34 1.2 2.3 92.5 28 48 1.8 3.2 95.7 29 25 .9 1.7 97.3 30 30 1.1 2.0 99.3 31 9 .3 .6 99.9 34 1 .0 .1 100.0 . 1221 44.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1504 Missing cases 1221 YEAR94 Q37 Year of todays date Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 94 1511 55.4 100.0 100.0 . 1214 44.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1511 Missing cases 1214 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RSPN94 Responded to 1994 wave Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO .00 1172 43.0 43.0 43.0 YES 1.00 1553 57.0 57.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 *1996A* WAVE6A survey wave Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 1157 42.5 93.2 93.2 2 85 3.1 6.8 100.0 . 1483 54.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1242 Missing cases 1483 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PTYHRS6A Q1, hours per week to party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT INVOLVED 1 828 30.4 68.5 68.5 TWO HOURS OR LESS 2 230 8.4 19.0 87.5 THREE TO FIVE HOURS 3 91 3.3 7.5 95.0 SIX TO TEN HOURS 4 38 1.4 3.1 98.2 MORE THAN TEN HOURS 5 22 .8 1.8 100.0 . 1516 55.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1209 Missing cases 1516 INTRN6A Q2, Rep Pres nomination Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY INTERESTED 1 489 17.9 42.4 42.4 2 183 6.7 15.9 58.3 3 151 5.5 13.1 71.4 4 96 3.5 8.3 79.7 5 58 2.1 5.0 84.7 6 56 2.1 4.9 89.6 NOT INTERESTED 7 120 4.4 10.4 100.0 . 1572 57.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1153 Missing cases 1572 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INTGE6A Q2, general election for President Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY INTERESTED 1 946 34.7 78.2 78.2 2 150 5.5 12.4 90.7 3 66 2.4 5.5 96.1 4 21 .8 1.7 97.8 5 12 .4 1.0 98.8 6 4 .1 .3 99.2 NOT INTERESTED 7 10 .4 .8 100.0 . 1516 55.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1209 Missing cases 1516 INTHRD6A Q2, US House race in your district Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY INTERESTED 1 626 23.0 53.6 53.6 2 214 7.9 18.3 71.9 3 145 5.3 12.4 84.3 4 92 3.4 7.9 92.1 5 38 1.4 3.3 95.4 6 23 .8 2.0 97.3 NOT INTERESTED 7 31 1.1 2.7 100.0 . 1556 57.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1169 Missing cases 1556 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INTHRN6A Q2, US House races nationally Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY INTERESTED 1 461 16.9 39.3 39.3 2 254 9.3 21.7 61.0 3 199 7.3 17.0 78.0 4 133 4.9 11.3 89.3 5 61 2.2 5.2 94.5 6 37 1.4 3.2 97.7 NOT INTERESTED 7 27 1.0 2.3 100.0 . 1553 57.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1172 Missing cases 1553 INTSLR6A Q2, other state and local races Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY INTERESTED 1 600 22.0 51.0 51.0 2 261 9.6 22.2 73.2 3 163 6.0 13.8 87.0 4 86 3.2 7.3 94.3 5 37 1.4 3.1 97.5 6 15 .6 1.3 98.7 NOT INTERESTED 7 15 .6 1.3 100.0 . 1548 56.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1177 Missing cases 1548 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HVOT926A Q3, How vote in the 1992 presidential ra Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent GEORGE BUSH 1 520 19.1 42.2 42.2 BILL CLINTON 2 636 23.3 51.6 93.8 H. ROSS PEROT 3 62 2.3 5.0 98.9 OTHER/WRITE-IN 4 14 .5 1.1 100.0 . 1493 54.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1232 Missing cases 1493 HVOT946A Q4, How vote in the 1994 US House race Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE 1 618 22.7 50.4 50.4 REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE 2 578 21.2 47.1 97.5 OTHER/WRITE-IN 3 9 .3 .7 98.2 DID NOT VOTE 4 22 .8 1.8 100.0 . 1498 55.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1227 Missing cases 1498 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONDH6A Q5, Dem House, contributed money Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1343 49.3 86.5 86.5 CHECKED 1 209 7.7 13.5 100.0 . 1173 43.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1552 Missing cases 1173 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVDH6A Q5, Dem House, convince friends Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1316 48.3 84.8 84.8 CHECKED 1 236 8.7 15.2 100.0 . 1173 43.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1552 Missing cases 1173 CLRKDH6A Q5, Dem House, clerical work Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1523 55.9 98.1 98.1 CHECKED 1 29 1.1 1.9 100.0 . 1173 43.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1552 Missing cases 1173 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVDH6A Q5, Dem House, canvassing Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1505 55.2 97.0 97.0 CHECKED 1 47 1.7 3.0 100.0 . 1173 43.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1552 Missing cases 1173 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OTHRDH6A Q5, Dem House, other activity Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1463 53.7 94.3 94.3 CHECKED 1 89 3.3 5.7 100.0 . 1173 43.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1552 Missing cases 1173 MONRH6A Q5, Rep House, contributed money Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1298 47.6 83.6 83.6 CHECKED 1 254 9.3 16.4 100.0 . 1173 43.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1552 Missing cases 1173 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVRH6A Q5, Rep House, convince friends Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1286 47.2 82.9 82.9 CHECKED 1 266 9.8 17.1 100.0 . 1173 43.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1552 Missing cases 1173 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLRKRH6A Q5, Rep House, clerical work Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1507 55.3 97.1 97.1 CHECKED 1 45 1.7 2.9 100.0 . 1173 43.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1552 Missing cases 1173 CANVRH6A Q5, Rep House, canvassing Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1475 54.1 95.0 95.0 CHECKED 1 77 2.8 5.0 100.0 . 1173 43.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1552 Missing cases 1173 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OTHRRH6A Q5, Rep House, other activity Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1418 52.0 91.4 91.4 CHECKED 1 134 4.9 8.6 100.0 . 1173 43.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1552 Missing cases 1173 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONDS6A Q5, Dem Senate, contributed money Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1387 50.9 89.4 89.4 CHECKED 1 165 6.1 10.6 100.0 . 1173 43.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1552 Missing cases 1173 CONVDS6A Q5, Dem Senate, convince friends Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1348 49.5 86.9 86.9 CHECKED 1 204 7.5 13.1 100.0 . 1173 43.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1552 Missing cases 1173 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLRKDS6A Q5, Dem Senate, clerical work Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1530 56.1 98.6 98.6 CHECKED 1 22 .8 1.4 100.0 . 1173 43.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1552 Missing cases 1173 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVDS6A Q5, Dem Senate, canvassing Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1512 55.5 97.4 97.4 CHECKED 1 40 1.5 2.6 100.0 . 1173 43.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1552 Missing cases 1173 OTHRDS6A Q5, Dem Senate, other activity Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1482 54.4 95.5 95.5 CHECKED 1 70 2.6 4.5 100.0 . 1173 43.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1552 Missing cases 1173 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONRS6A Q5, Rep Senate, contributed money Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1393 51.1 89.8 89.8 CHECKED 1 159 5.8 10.2 100.0 . 1173 43.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1552 Missing cases 1173 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVRS6A Q5, Rep Senate, convince friends Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1362 50.0 87.8 87.8 CHECKED 1 190 7.0 12.2 100.0 . 1173 43.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1552 Missing cases 1173 CLRKRS6A Q5, Rep Senate, clerical work Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1520 55.8 97.9 97.9 CHECKED 1 32 1.2 2.1 100.0 . 1173 43.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1552 Missing cases 1173 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVRS6A Q5, Rep Senate, canvassing Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1502 55.1 96.8 96.8 CHECKED 1 50 1.8 3.2 100.0 . 1173 43.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1552 Missing cases 1173 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OTHRRS6A Q5, Rep Senate, other activity Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1457 53.5 93.9 93.9 CHECKED 1 95 3.5 6.1 100.0 . 1173 43.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1552 Missing cases 1173 MONDG6A Q5, Dem gubern, contributed money Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1421 52.1 91.6 91.6 CHECKED 1 131 4.8 8.4 100.0 . 1173 43.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1552 Missing cases 1173 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVDG6A Q5, Dem gubern, convince friends Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1374 50.4 88.5 88.5 CHECKED 1 178 6.5 11.5 100.0 . 1173 43.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1552 Missing cases 1173 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLRKDG6A Q5, Dem gubern, clerical work Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1538 56.4 99.1 99.1 CHECKED 1 14 .5 .9 100.0 . 1173 43.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1552 Missing cases 1173 CANVDG6A Q5, Dem gubern, canvassing Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1516 55.6 97.7 97.7 CHECKED 1 36 1.3 2.3 100.0 . 1173 43.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1552 Missing cases 1173 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OTHRDG6A Q5, Dem gubern, other activity Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1490 54.7 96.0 96.0 CHECKED 1 62 2.3 4.0 100.0 . 1173 43.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1552 Missing cases 1173 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONRG6A Q5, Rep gubern, contributed money Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1368 50.2 88.1 88.1 CHECKED 1 184 6.8 11.9 100.0 . 1173 43.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1552 Missing cases 1173 CONVRG6A Q5, Rep gubern, convince friends Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1344 49.3 86.6 86.6 CHECKED 1 208 7.6 13.4 100.0 . 1173 43.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1552 Missing cases 1173 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLRKRG6A Q5, Rep gubern, clerical work Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1526 56.0 98.3 98.3 CHECKED 1 26 1.0 1.7 100.0 . 1173 43.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1552 Missing cases 1173 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVRG6A Q5, Rep gubern, canvassing Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1495 54.9 96.3 96.3 CHECKED 1 57 2.1 3.7 100.0 . 1173 43.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1552 Missing cases 1173 OTHRRG6A Q5, Rep gubern, other activity Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1454 53.4 93.7 93.7 CHECKED 1 98 3.6 6.3 100.0 . 1173 43.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1552 Missing cases 1173 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PTYID6A Q6, describe your party affiliation Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONG DEMOCRAT 1 354 13.0 28.9 28.9 WEAK DEMOCRAT 2 165 6.1 13.5 42.4 INDEPENDENT DEM 3 102 3.7 8.3 50.8 INDEPENDENT 4 31 1.1 2.5 53.3 INDEPENDENT REP 5 67 2.5 5.5 58.8 WEAK REPUBLICAN 6 126 4.6 10.3 69.1 STRONG REPUBLICAN 7 378 13.9 30.9 100.0 . 1497 54.9 Missing OTHER PTY WRITE-IN 8 5 .2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1223 Missing cases 1502 LIBCON6A Q7, describe your political philosophy Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 25 .9 2.1 2.1 LIBERAL 2 230 8.4 19.2 21.3 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 157 5.8 13.1 34.4 MIDDLE OF-THE-ROAD 4 188 6.9 15.7 50.0 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 183 6.7 15.3 65.3 CONSERVATIVE 6 372 13.7 31.0 96.3 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 44 1.6 3.7 100.0 . 1502 55.1 Missing OTHER/WRITE-IN 8 14 .5 Missing NOT SURE 9 10 .4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1199 Missing cases 1526 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CHAR6A Q8, characterize yourself: Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent INVOLVED CONSISTENTL 1 781 28.7 65.9 65.9 INVOLVED WORTHWHILE 2 405 14.9 34.1 100.0 . 1539 56.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1186 Missing cases 1539 ABORT6A Q9, amendment to prohibit abortions Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 181 6.6 15.7 15.7 FAVOR 2 137 5.0 11.9 27.5 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 74 2.7 6.4 33.9 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 67 2.5 5.8 39.7 OPPOSE 5 165 6.1 14.3 54.0 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 532 19.5 46.0 100.0 . 1512 55.5 Missing NOT SURE 7 57 2.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1156 Missing cases 1569 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INVOL6A Q9, decreased US involvement Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 114 4.2 9.8 9.8 FAVOR 2 251 9.2 21.6 31.4 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 238 8.7 20.4 51.8 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 153 5.6 13.1 64.9 OPPOSE 5 235 8.6 20.2 85.1 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 173 6.3 14.9 100.0 . 1510 55.4 Missing NOT SURE 7 51 1.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1164 Missing cases 1561 DEFTX6A Q9, reduce deficit, higher taxes Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 147 5.4 12.8 12.8 FAVOR 2 289 10.6 25.1 37.8 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 263 9.7 22.8 60.7 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 121 4.4 10.5 71.2 OPPOSE 5 168 6.2 14.6 85.8 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 164 6.0 14.2 100.0 . 1516 55.6 Missing NOT SURE 7 57 2.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1152 Missing cases 1573 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - POLLUT6A Q9, more regulation to control pollution Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 200 7.3 17.1 17.1 FAVOR 2 320 11.7 27.4 44.4 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 210 7.7 17.9 62.4 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 97 3.6 8.3 70.7 OPPOSE 5 184 6.8 15.7 86.4 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 159 5.8 13.6 100.0 . 1510 55.4 Missing NOT SURE 7 45 1.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1170 Missing cases 1555 IMPORT6A Q9, limits on foreign imports Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 158 5.8 13.9 13.9 FAVOR 2 240 8.8 21.1 34.9 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 250 9.2 21.9 56.9 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 148 5.4 13.0 69.9 OPPOSE 5 233 8.6 20.5 90.3 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 110 4.0 9.7 100.0 . 1509 55.4 Missing NOT SURE 7 77 2.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1139 Missing cases 1586 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AFFACT6A Q9, affirmative action programs Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 95 3.5 8.3 8.3 FAVOR 2 180 6.6 15.7 24.0 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 200 7.3 17.5 41.5 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 151 5.5 13.2 54.7 OPPOSE 5 241 8.8 21.0 75.7 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 278 10.2 24.3 100.0 . 1517 55.7 Missing NOT SURE 7 63 2.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1145 Missing cases 1580 TERM6A Q9, term limits for Congress Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 250 9.2 21.7 21.7 FAVOR 2 284 10.4 24.6 46.3 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 188 6.9 16.3 62.6 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 70 2.6 6.1 68.7 OPPOSE 5 165 6.1 14.3 83.0 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 196 7.2 17.0 100.0 . 1503 55.2 Missing NOT SURE 7 69 2.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1153 Missing cases 1572 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NHI6A Q9, national health insurance plan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 226 8.3 20.1 20.1 FAVOR 2 244 9.0 21.7 41.7 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 148 5.4 13.1 54.9 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 59 2.2 5.2 60.1 OPPOSE 5 146 5.4 13.0 73.1 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 303 11.1 26.9 100.0 . 1503 55.2 Missing NOT SURE 7 96 3.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1126 Missing cases 1599 DEFGP6A Q9, reduce deficit, program cuts Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 290 10.6 24.8 24.8 FAVOR 2 323 11.9 27.6 52.4 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 233 8.6 19.9 72.3 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 103 3.8 8.8 81.1 OPPOSE 5 131 4.8 11.2 92.3 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 90 3.3 7.7 100.0 . 1500 55.0 Missing NOT SURE 7 55 2.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1170 Missing cases 1555 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SHFTST6A Q9, domestic programs to the states Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 277 10.2 23.8 23.8 FAVOR 2 331 12.1 28.4 52.1 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 190 7.0 16.3 68.4 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 105 3.9 9.0 77.4 OPPOSE 5 155 5.7 13.3 90.7 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 108 4.0 9.3 100.0 . 1504 55.2 Missing NOT SURE 7 55 2.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1166 Missing cases 1559 ARM6A Q9, increased firearms regulation Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 378 13.9 32.7 32.7 FAVOR 2 253 9.3 21.9 54.5 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 122 4.5 10.5 65.1 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 68 2.5 5.9 71.0 OPPOSE 5 119 4.4 10.3 81.2 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 217 8.0 18.8 100.0 . 1516 55.6 Missing NOT SURE 7 52 1.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1157 Missing cases 1568 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FLTTAX6A Q9, flat tax Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 131 4.8 12.7 12.7 FAVOR 2 171 6.3 16.6 29.4 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 135 5.0 13.1 42.5 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 68 2.5 6.6 49.1 OPPOSE 5 201 7.4 19.6 68.7 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 322 11.8 31.3 100.0 . 1503 55.2 Missing NOT SURE 7 194 7.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1028 Missing cases 1697 MIISS6A Q10, most important issue in Q9: Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ABORTION 1 141 5.2 12.0 12.0 US INVOLVEMENT 2 39 1.4 3.3 15.3 TAX INCREASE 3 128 4.7 10.9 26.1 POLLUTION 4 61 2.2 5.2 31.3 IMPORTS 5 39 1.4 3.3 34.6 AFFIRMATIVE ACTION 6 38 1.4 3.2 37.9 TERM LIMITS 7 35 1.3 3.0 40.8 NATL HEALTH INSUR 8 196 7.2 16.6 57.5 PROGRAM CUTS 9 266 9.8 22.6 80.1 DOMESTIC PROGRAMS 10 90 3.3 7.6 87.7 FIREARMS 11 61 2.2 5.2 92.9 FLAT TAX 12 84 3.1 7.1 100.0 . 1504 55.2 Missing NOT SURE 13 43 1.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1178 Missing cases 1547 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PRIORP6A Q11, Republican Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent TOP PRIORITY 1 376 13.8 33.2 33.2 PRIORITY 2 373 13.7 33.0 66.2 NOT A PRIORITY 3 383 14.1 33.8 100.0 . 1530 56.1 Missing NOT SURE 4 63 2.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1132 Missing cases 1593 PRIODP6A Q11, Democratic Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent TOP PRIORITY 1 179 6.6 15.9 15.9 PRIORITY 2 439 16.1 39.0 54.9 NOT A PRIORITY 3 508 18.6 45.1 100.0 . 1532 56.2 Missing NOT SURE 4 67 2.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1126 Missing cases 1599 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PRIORE6A Q11, Reform Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent TOP PRIORITY 1 118 4.3 25.9 25.9 PRIORITY 2 155 5.7 34.1 60.0 NOT A PRIORITY 3 182 6.7 40.0 100.0 . 1595 58.5 Missing NOT SURE 4 675 24.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 455 Missing cases 2270 MIISLA6A Q12, Lamar Alexander Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 75 2.8 11.5 11.5 FAVOR 2 232 8.5 35.6 47.1 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 142 5.2 21.8 68.9 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 47 1.7 7.2 76.1 OPPOSE 5 106 3.9 16.3 92.3 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 50 1.8 7.7 100.0 . 1620 59.4 Missing NOT SURE 7 453 16.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 652 Missing cases 2073 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MIISBB6A Q12, Bill Bradley Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 48 1.8 9.4 9.4 FAVOR 2 162 5.9 31.6 40.9 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 91 3.3 17.7 58.7 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 42 1.5 8.2 66.9 OPPOSE 5 106 3.9 20.7 87.5 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 64 2.3 12.5 100.0 . 1654 60.7 Missing NOT SURE 7 558 20.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 513 Missing cases 2212 MIISPB6A Q12, Patrick Buchanan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 297 10.9 33.6 33.6 FAVOR 2 192 7.0 21.7 55.3 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 68 2.5 7.7 63.0 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 35 1.3 4.0 67.0 OPPOSE 5 84 3.1 9.5 76.5 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 208 7.6 23.5 100.0 . 1623 59.6 Missing NOT SURE 7 218 8.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 884 Missing cases 1841 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MIISBC6A Q12, Bill Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 214 7.9 20.6 20.6 FAVOR 2 214 7.9 20.6 41.1 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 147 5.4 14.1 55.2 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 41 1.5 3.9 59.2 OPPOSE 5 167 6.1 16.0 75.2 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 258 9.5 24.8 100.0 . 1586 58.2 Missing NOT SURE 7 98 3.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1041 Missing cases 1684 MIISRD6A Q12, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 160 5.9 16.2 16.2 FAVOR 2 289 10.6 29.2 45.4 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 199 7.3 20.1 65.5 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 76 2.8 7.7 73.1 OPPOSE 5 162 5.9 16.4 89.5 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 104 3.8 10.5 100.0 . 1598 58.6 Missing NOT SURE 7 137 5.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 990 Missing cases 1735 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MIISSF6A Q12, Steve Forbes Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 157 5.8 22.6 22.6 FAVOR 2 163 6.0 23.5 46.0 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 116 4.3 16.7 62.7 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 65 2.4 9.4 72.1 OPPOSE 5 111 4.1 16.0 88.1 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 83 3.0 11.9 100.0 . 1629 59.8 Missing NOT SURE 7 401 14.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 695 Missing cases 2030 MIISPG6A Q12, Phil Gramm Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 234 8.6 28.0 28.0 FAVOR 2 229 8.4 27.4 55.3 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 70 2.6 8.4 63.7 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 35 1.3 4.2 67.9 OPPOSE 5 96 3.5 11.5 79.3 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 173 6.3 20.7 100.0 . 1627 59.7 Missing NOT SURE 7 261 9.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 837 Missing cases 1888 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MIISRL6A Q12, Richard Lugar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 73 2.7 12.5 12.5 FAVOR 2 204 7.5 34.9 47.4 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 116 4.3 19.8 67.2 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 62 2.3 10.6 77.8 OPPOSE 5 68 2.5 11.6 89.4 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 62 2.3 10.6 100.0 . 1638 60.1 Missing NOT SURE 7 502 18.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 585 Missing cases 2140 MIIHRP6A Q12, H. Ross Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 156 5.7 26.3 26.3 FAVOR 2 134 4.9 22.6 48.9 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 72 2.6 12.1 61.0 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 45 1.7 7.6 68.6 OPPOSE 5 94 3.4 15.9 84.5 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 92 3.4 15.5 100.0 . 1631 59.9 Missing NOT SURE 7 501 18.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 593 Missing cases 2132 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MIISAA6A Q12, Average American voter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 127 4.7 12.5 12.5 FAVOR 2 394 14.5 38.9 51.4 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 295 10.8 29.1 80.6 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 85 3.1 8.4 88.9 OPPOSE 5 82 3.0 8.1 97.0 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 30 1.1 3.0 100.0 . 1611 59.1 Missing NOT SURE 7 101 3.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1013 Missing cases 1712 MIISDP6A Q12, Democratic Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 105 3.9 9.9 9.9 FAVOR 2 284 10.4 26.8 36.8 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 166 6.1 15.7 52.5 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 82 3.0 7.8 60.2 OPPOSE 5 217 8.0 20.5 80.7 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 204 7.5 19.3 100.0 . 1607 59.0 Missing NOT SURE 7 60 2.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1058 Missing cases 1667 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MIISRP6A Q12, Republican Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 206 7.6 19.9 19.9 FAVOR 2 300 11.0 28.9 48.8 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 151 5.5 14.6 63.4 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 74 2.7 7.1 70.5 OPPOSE 5 154 5.7 14.9 85.3 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 152 5.6 14.7 100.0 . 1617 59.3 Missing NOT SURE 7 71 2.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1037 Missing cases 1688 MIISRE6A Q12, Reform Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 51 1.9 15.6 15.6 FAVOR 2 95 3.5 29.1 44.8 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 67 2.5 20.6 65.3 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 36 1.3 11.0 76.4 OPPOSE 5 41 1.5 12.6 89.0 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 36 1.3 11.0 100.0 . 1664 61.1 Missing NOT SURE 7 735 27.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 326 Missing cases 2399 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TRUGOV6A Q13, the US government Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent JUST ABOUT ALWAYS 1 15 .6 1.2 1.2 MOST OF THE TIME 2 304 11.2 24.7 26.0 SOME OF THE TIME 3 729 26.8 59.3 85.3 ALMOST NEVER 4 155 5.7 12.6 97.9 NEVER 5 26 1.0 2.1 100.0 . 1496 54.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1229 Missing cases 1496 APPBC6A Q14, Bill Clinton as President Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent APPROVE STRONGLY 1 191 7.0 15.8 15.8 APPROVE 2 495 18.2 40.8 56.6 DISAPPROVE 3 226 8.3 18.6 75.2 DISAPPROVE STRONGLY 4 300 11.0 24.8 100.0 . 1488 54.6 Missing NOT SURE 5 25 .9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1212 Missing cases 1513 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - APPNG6A Q14, Newt Gingrich as Speaker Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent APPROVE STRONGLY 1 133 4.9 11.3 11.3 APPROVE 2 336 12.3 28.5 39.8 DISAPPROVE 3 255 9.4 21.6 61.5 DISAPPROVE STRONGLY 4 454 16.7 38.5 100.0 . 1497 54.9 Missing NOT SURE 5 50 1.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1178 Missing cases 1547 APPRD6A Q14, Robert Dole as Sen Maj Leader Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent APPROVE STRONGLY 1 148 5.4 12.8 12.8 APPROVE 2 538 19.7 46.6 59.4 DISAPPROVE 3 332 12.2 28.8 88.2 DISAPPROVE STRONGLY 4 136 5.0 11.8 100.0 . 1498 55.0 Missing NOT SURE 5 73 2.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1154 Missing cases 1571 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NECON6A Q15, the nation as a whole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUCH BETTER 1 75 2.8 6.1 6.1 SOMEWHAT BETTER 2 358 13.1 29.1 35.2 ABOUT THE SAME 3 536 19.7 43.5 78.7 SOMEWHAT WORSE 4 222 8.1 18.0 96.8 MUCH WORSE 5 40 1.5 3.2 100.0 . 1494 54.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1231 Missing cases 1494 PECON6A Q15, you and your family Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUCH BETTER 1 53 1.9 4.3 4.3 SOMEWHAT BETTER 2 298 10.9 24.4 28.7 ABOUT THE SAME 3 708 26.0 57.9 86.6 SOMEWHAT WORSE 4 138 5.1 11.3 97.9 MUCH WORSE 5 26 1.0 2.1 100.0 . 1502 55.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1223 Missing cases 1502 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FNECON6A Q16, the nation as a whole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUCH BETTER 1 22 .8 1.8 1.8 SOMEWHAT BETTER 2 240 8.8 19.5 21.3 ABOUT THE SAME 3 652 23.9 53.0 74.3 SOMEWHAT WORSE 4 286 10.5 23.3 97.6 MUCH WORSE 5 30 1.1 2.4 100.0 . 1495 54.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1230 Missing cases 1495 FPECON6A Q16, you and your family Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUCH BETTER 1 28 1.0 2.3 2.3 SOMEWHAT BETTER 2 225 8.3 18.5 20.9 ABOUT THE SAME 3 805 29.5 66.4 87.2 SOMEWHAT WORSE 4 140 5.1 11.5 98.8 MUCH WORSE 5 15 .6 1.2 100.0 . 1512 55.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1213 Missing cases 1512 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FNECPR6A Q17, How certain are you for Q16a? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY CERTAIN 1 94 3.4 7.7 7.7 CERTAIN 2 588 21.6 48.0 55.7 SOMEWHAT UNCERTAIN 3 506 18.6 41.3 97.0 VERY UNCERTAIN 4 37 1.4 3.0 100.0 . 1500 55.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1225 Missing cases 1500 FPECPR6A Q18, How certain are you for Q16b? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY CERTAIN 1 181 6.6 14.8 14.8 CERTAIN 2 651 23.9 53.3 68.1 SOMEWHAT UNCERTAIN 3 373 13.7 30.5 98.6 VERY UNCERTAIN 4 17 .6 1.4 100.0 . 1503 55.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1222 Missing cases 1503 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCLA6A Q19, Lamar Alexander Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 4 .1 .4 .4 LIBERAL 2 17 .6 1.8 2.2 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 38 1.4 4.0 6.2 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 182 6.7 19.2 25.4 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 290 10.6 30.6 56.0 CONSERVATIVE 6 390 14.3 41.1 97.0 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 28 1.0 3.0 100.0 . 1573 57.7 Missing NOT SURE 8 203 7.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 949 Missing cases 1776 LCBB6A Q19, Bill Bradley Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 39 1.4 5.3 5.3 LIBERAL 2 220 8.1 30.1 35.5 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 196 7.2 26.8 62.3 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 155 5.7 21.2 83.6 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 50 1.8 6.8 90.4 CONSERVATIVE 6 58 2.1 7.9 98.4 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 12 .4 1.6 100.0 . 1596 58.6 Missing NOT SURE 8 399 14.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 730 Missing cases 1995 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCPB6A Q19, Patrick Buchanan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 6 .2 .5 .5 LIBERAL 2 10 .4 .9 1.5 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 9 .3 .8 2.3 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 27 1.0 2.5 4.8 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 33 1.2 3.0 7.8 CONSERVATIVE 6 192 7.0 17.6 25.3 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 816 29.9 74.7 100.0 . 1565 57.4 Missing NOT SURE 8 67 2.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1093 Missing cases 1632 LCBC6A Q19, Bill Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 283 10.4 24.1 24.1 LIBERAL 2 419 15.4 35.8 59.9 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 276 10.1 23.5 83.4 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 162 5.9 13.8 97.3 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 22 .8 1.9 99.1 CONSERVATIVE 6 6 .2 .5 99.7 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 4 .1 .3 100.0 . 1537 56.4 Missing NOT SURE 8 16 .6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1172 Missing cases 1553 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCRD6A Q19, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 3 .1 .3 .3 LIBERAL 2 9 .3 .8 1.0 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 33 1.2 2.9 3.9 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 155 5.7 13.5 17.4 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 261 9.6 22.7 40.1 CONSERVATIVE 6 598 21.9 52.0 92.0 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 92 3.4 8.0 100.0 . 1547 56.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 27 1.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1151 Missing cases 1574 LCSF6A Q19, Steve Forbes Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 11 .4 1.2 1.2 LIBERAL 2 23 .8 2.5 3.7 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 50 1.8 5.4 9.1 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 111 4.1 12.0 21.1 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 226 8.3 24.5 45.7 CONSERVATIVE 6 383 14.1 41.5 87.2 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 118 4.3 12.8 100.0 . 1579 57.9 Missing NOT SURE 8 224 8.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 922 Missing cases 1803 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCNG6A Q19, Newt Gingrich Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 12 .4 1.1 1.1 LIBERAL 2 10 .4 .9 2.0 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 10 .4 .9 2.9 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 30 1.1 2.7 5.6 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 52 1.9 4.7 10.3 CONSERVATIVE 6 414 15.2 37.4 47.7 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 580 21.3 52.3 100.0 . 1560 57.2 Missing NOT SURE 8 57 2.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1108 Missing cases 1617 LCPG6A Q19, Phil Gramm Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 3 .1 .3 .3 LIBERAL 2 2 .1 .2 .5 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 7 .3 .7 1.2 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 39 1.4 3.8 5.0 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 70 2.6 6.9 11.9 CONSERVATIVE 6 401 14.7 39.4 51.3 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 496 18.2 48.7 100.0 . 1582 58.1 Missing NOT SURE 8 125 4.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1018 Missing cases 1707 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCJJ6A Q19, Jesse Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 636 23.3 60.1 60.1 LIBERAL 2 308 11.3 29.1 89.2 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 53 1.9 5.0 94.2 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 29 1.1 2.7 97.0 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 12 .4 1.1 98.1 CONSERVATIVE 6 15 .6 1.4 99.5 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 5 .2 .5 100.0 . 1571 57.7 Missing NOT SURE 8 96 3.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1058 Missing cases 1667 LCRL6A Q19, Richard Lugar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 5 .2 .6 .6 LIBERAL 2 10 .4 1.3 1.9 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 32 1.2 4.1 6.0 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 188 6.9 24.0 30.1 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 194 7.1 24.8 54.9 CONSERVATIVE 6 296 10.9 37.9 92.7 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 57 2.1 7.3 100.0 . 1593 58.5 Missing NOT SURE 8 350 12.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 782 Missing cases 1943 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCHRP6A Q19, H. Ross Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 12 .4 1.5 1.5 LIBERAL 2 35 1.3 4.2 5.7 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 35 1.3 4.2 9.9 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 133 4.9 16.1 26.0 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 161 5.9 19.5 45.5 CONSERVATIVE 6 327 12.0 39.5 85.0 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 124 4.6 15.0 100.0 . 1577 57.9 Missing NOT SURE 8 321 11.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 827 Missing cases 1898 LCCP6A Q19, Colin Powell Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 13 .5 1.5 1.5 LIBERAL 2 33 1.2 3.8 5.3 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 97 3.6 11.2 16.5 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 352 12.9 40.6 57.0 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 220 8.1 25.3 82.4 CONSERVATIVE 6 138 5.1 15.9 98.3 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 15 .6 1.7 100.0 . 1563 57.4 Missing NOT SURE 8 294 10.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 868 Missing cases 1857 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCAA6A Q19, average American voter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 3 .1 .3 .3 LIBERAL 2 24 .9 2.1 2.4 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 114 4.2 10.2 12.6 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 483 17.7 43.0 55.6 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 402 14.8 35.8 91.4 CONSERVATIVE 6 94 3.4 8.4 99.7 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 3 .1 .3 100.0 . 1554 57.0 Missing NOT SURE 8 48 1.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1123 Missing cases 1602 LCDP6A Q19, Democratic Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 177 6.5 15.2 15.2 LIBERAL 2 494 18.1 42.5 57.8 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 373 13.7 32.1 89.9 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 88 3.2 7.6 97.5 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 18 .7 1.6 99.1 CONSERVATIVE 6 8 .3 .7 99.7 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 3 .1 .3 100.0 . 1551 56.9 Missing NOT SURE 8 13 .5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1161 Missing cases 1564 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCRP6A Q19, Republican Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 5 .2 .4 .4 LIBERAL 2 7 .3 .6 1.0 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 14 .5 1.2 2.3 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 53 1.9 4.6 6.9 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 208 7.6 18.2 25.1 CONSERVATIVE 6 654 24.0 57.2 82.3 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 203 7.4 17.7 100.0 . 1555 57.1 Missing NOT SURE 8 26 1.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1144 Missing cases 1581 LCUWS6A Q19, United We Stand America Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 12 .4 2.0 2.0 LIBERAL 2 18 .7 3.1 5.1 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 24 .9 4.1 9.2 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 96 3.5 16.4 25.6 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 120 4.4 20.4 46.0 CONSERVATIVE 6 192 7.0 32.7 78.7 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 125 4.6 21.3 100.0 . 1584 58.1 Missing NOT SURE 8 554 20.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 587 Missing cases 2138 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCRE6A Q19, Reform Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 8 .3 2.9 2.9 LIBERAL 2 12 .4 4.3 7.2 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 24 .9 8.6 15.8 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 60 2.2 21.6 37.4 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 61 2.2 21.9 59.4 CONSERVATIVE 6 73 2.7 26.3 85.6 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 40 1.5 14.4 100.0 . 1591 58.4 Missing NOT SURE 8 856 31.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 278 Missing cases 2447 EVALA6A Q20, Lamar Alexander Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 19 .7 2.1 2.1 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 173 6.3 19.5 21.7 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 227 8.3 25.6 47.3 AVERAGE 4 301 11.0 34.0 81.3 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 87 3.2 9.8 91.1 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 40 1.5 4.5 95.6 POOR 7 39 1.4 4.4 100.0 . 1614 59.2 Missing NOT SURE 8 225 8.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 886 Missing cases 1839 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVABB6A Q20, Bill Bradley Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 50 1.8 6.9 6.9 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 198 7.3 27.4 34.3 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 162 5.9 22.4 56.8 AVERAGE 4 178 6.5 24.7 81.4 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 64 2.3 8.9 90.3 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 38 1.4 5.3 95.6 POOR 7 32 1.2 4.4 100.0 . 1632 59.9 Missing NOT SURE 8 371 13.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 722 Missing cases 2003 EVAPB6A Q20, Patrick Buchanan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 29 1.1 2.8 2.8 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 129 4.7 12.4 15.2 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 163 6.0 15.7 30.9 AVERAGE 4 152 5.6 14.6 45.5 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 119 4.4 11.4 56.9 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 154 5.7 14.8 71.7 POOR 7 294 10.8 28.3 100.0 . 1624 59.6 Missing NOT SURE 8 61 2.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1040 Missing cases 1685 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVABC6A Q20, Bill Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 126 4.6 11.2 11.2 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 302 11.1 26.8 38.0 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 196 7.2 17.4 55.4 AVERAGE 4 132 4.8 11.7 67.1 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 98 3.6 8.7 75.8 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 95 3.5 8.4 84.3 POOR 7 177 6.5 15.7 100.0 . 1582 58.1 Missing NOT SURE 8 17 .6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1126 Missing cases 1599 EVARD6A Q20, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 57 2.1 5.2 5.2 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 292 10.7 26.7 31.9 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 248 9.1 22.7 54.6 AVERAGE 4 288 10.6 26.3 80.9 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 92 3.4 8.4 89.3 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 59 2.2 5.4 94.7 POOR 7 58 2.1 5.3 100.0 . 1603 58.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 28 1.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1094 Missing cases 1631 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVASF6A Q20, Steve Forbes Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 14 .5 1.6 1.6 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 80 2.9 9.0 10.5 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 130 4.8 14.6 25.1 AVERAGE 4 224 8.2 25.1 50.2 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 159 5.8 17.8 68.0 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 145 5.3 16.3 84.3 POOR 7 140 5.1 15.7 100.0 . 1627 59.7 Missing NOT SURE 8 206 7.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 892 Missing cases 1833 EVAAG6A Q20, Albert Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 94 3.4 8.9 8.9 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 244 9.0 23.0 31.9 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 180 6.6 17.0 48.8 AVERAGE 4 181 6.6 17.1 65.9 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 107 3.9 10.1 76.0 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 108 4.0 10.2 86.1 POOR 7 147 5.4 13.9 100.0 . 1613 59.2 Missing NOT SURE 8 51 1.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1061 Missing cases 1664 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVANG6A Q20, Newt Gingrich Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 82 3.0 7.6 7.6 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 198 7.3 18.3 25.9 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 151 5.5 14.0 39.9 AVERAGE 4 128 4.7 11.9 51.8 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 98 3.6 9.1 60.8 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 126 4.6 11.7 72.5 POOR 7 297 10.9 27.5 100.0 . 1611 59.1 Missing NOT SURE 8 34 1.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1080 Missing cases 1645 EVAPG6A Q20, Phil Gramm Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 16 .6 1.6 1.6 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 114 4.2 11.7 13.3 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 155 5.7 15.8 29.1 AVERAGE 4 194 7.1 19.8 49.0 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 116 4.3 11.9 60.8 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 132 4.8 13.5 74.3 POOR 7 251 9.2 25.7 100.0 . 1629 59.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 118 4.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 978 Missing cases 1747 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVAJJ6A Q20, Jesse Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 26 1.0 2.6 2.6 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 87 3.2 8.6 11.1 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 130 4.8 12.8 23.9 AVERAGE 4 190 7.0 18.7 42.7 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 149 5.5 14.7 57.3 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 147 5.4 14.5 71.8 POOR 7 286 10.5 28.2 100.0 . 1622 59.5 Missing NOT SURE 8 88 3.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1015 Missing cases 1710 EVARL6A Q20, Richard Lugar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 20 .7 2.6 2.6 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 120 4.4 15.3 17.9 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 171 6.3 21.8 39.7 AVERAGE 4 259 9.5 33.0 72.7 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 88 3.2 11.2 83.9 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 66 2.4 8.4 92.3 POOR 7 60 2.2 7.7 100.0 . 1633 59.9 Missing NOT SURE 8 308 11.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 784 Missing cases 1941 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVAHRP6A Q20, H. Ross Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 8 .3 .9 .9 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 58 2.1 6.3 7.1 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 116 4.3 12.5 19.7 AVERAGE 4 167 6.1 18.0 37.7 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 161 5.9 17.4 55.1 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 177 6.5 19.1 74.2 POOR 7 239 8.8 25.8 100.0 . 1627 59.7 Missing NOT SURE 8 172 6.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 926 Missing cases 1799 EVACP6A Q20, Colin Powell Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 89 3.3 9.9 9.9 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 248 9.1 27.6 37.5 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 224 8.2 24.9 62.4 AVERAGE 4 197 7.2 21.9 84.3 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 69 2.5 7.7 92.0 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 34 1.2 3.8 95.8 POOR 7 38 1.4 4.2 100.0 . 1622 59.5 Missing NOT SURE 8 204 7.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 899 Missing cases 1826 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVAAS6A Q20, Arlen Specter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 4 .1 .6 .6 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 35 1.3 5.2 5.8 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 135 5.0 19.9 25.7 AVERAGE 4 189 6.9 27.9 53.5 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 125 4.6 18.4 72.0 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 86 3.2 12.7 84.7 POOR 7 104 3.8 15.3 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing NOT SURE 8 400 14.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 678 Missing cases 2047 EVAHC6A Q20, Hillary Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 139 5.1 12.9 12.9 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 227 8.3 21.1 34.0 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 138 5.1 12.8 46.8 AVERAGE 4 114 4.2 10.6 57.4 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 68 2.5 6.3 63.8 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 79 2.9 7.3 71.1 POOR 7 311 11.4 28.9 100.0 . 1598 58.6 Missing NOT SURE 8 51 1.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1076 Missing cases 1649 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVADP6A Q20, Democratic Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 67 2.5 6.1 6.1 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 178 6.5 16.2 22.3 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 197 7.2 17.9 40.3 AVERAGE 4 248 9.1 22.6 62.8 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 127 4.7 11.6 74.4 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 135 5.0 12.3 86.7 POOR 7 146 5.4 13.3 100.0 . 1608 59.0 Missing NOT SURE 8 19 .7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1098 Missing cases 1627 EVARP6A Q20, Republican Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 35 1.3 3.3 3.3 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 165 6.1 15.3 18.6 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 212 7.8 19.7 38.3 AVERAGE 4 254 9.3 23.6 62.0 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 134 4.9 12.5 74.4 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 134 4.9 12.5 86.9 POOR 7 141 5.2 13.1 100.0 . 1621 59.5 Missing NOT SURE 8 29 1.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1075 Missing cases 1650 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVAUWS6A Q20, United We Stand America Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 5 .2 .9 .9 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 20 .7 3.5 4.4 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 54 2.0 9.6 14.0 AVERAGE 4 145 5.3 25.7 39.6 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 95 3.5 16.8 56.5 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 109 4.0 19.3 75.8 POOR 7 137 5.0 24.2 100.0 . 1663 61.0 Missing NOT SURE 8 497 18.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 565 Missing cases 2160 EVARE6A Q20, Reform Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 3 .1 1.0 1.0 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 3 .1 1.0 2.0 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 20 .7 6.6 8.6 AVERAGE 4 87 3.2 28.6 37.2 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 50 1.8 16.4 53.6 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 56 2.1 18.4 72.0 POOR 7 85 3.1 28.0 100.0 . 1668 61.2 Missing NOT SURE 8 753 27.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 304 Missing cases 2421 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVACON6A Q20, Congress Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 5 .2 .5 .5 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 56 2.1 5.3 5.8 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 129 4.7 12.2 18.0 AVERAGE 4 290 10.6 27.5 45.5 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 227 8.3 21.5 67.0 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 179 6.6 17.0 84.0 POOR 7 169 6.2 16.0 100.0 . 1629 59.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 41 1.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1055 Missing cases 1670 EVASC6A Q20, Supreme Court Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 17 .6 1.6 1.6 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 123 4.5 11.8 13.4 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 223 8.2 21.4 34.9 AVERAGE 4 349 12.8 33.5 68.4 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 165 6.1 15.9 84.2 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 86 3.2 8.3 92.5 POOR 7 78 2.9 7.5 100.0 . 1632 59.9 Missing NOT SURE 8 52 1.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1041 Missing cases 1684 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVAMIL6A Q20, US Military Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 99 3.6 9.9 9.9 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 271 9.9 27.1 37.0 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 227 8.3 22.7 59.7 AVERAGE 4 274 10.1 27.4 87.1 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 79 2.9 7.9 95.0 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 29 1.1 2.9 97.9 POOR 7 21 .8 2.1 100.0 . 1648 60.5 Missing NOT SURE 8 77 2.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 1725 EVACHR6A Q20, Fundamentalist Christians Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 24 .9 2.8 2.8 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 75 2.8 8.7 11.5 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 77 2.8 9.0 20.5 AVERAGE 4 129 4.7 15.0 35.5 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 83 3.0 9.7 45.2 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 119 4.4 13.9 59.0 POOR 7 352 12.9 41.0 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing NOT SURE 8 219 8.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 859 Missing cases 1866 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVAUN6A Q20, The United Nations Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 22 .8 2.2 2.2 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 80 2.9 8.0 10.2 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 147 5.4 14.7 24.9 AVERAGE 4 281 10.3 28.2 53.1 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 147 5.4 14.7 67.8 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 131 4.8 13.1 81.0 POOR 7 190 7.0 19.0 100.0 . 1627 59.7 Missing NOT SURE 8 100 3.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 998 Missing cases 1727 TVLA6A Q21, Lamar Alexander Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 15 .6 1.6 1.6 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 174 6.4 18.8 20.4 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 260 9.5 28.0 48.4 AVERAGE 4 315 11.6 34.0 82.4 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 67 2.5 7.2 89.6 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 43 1.6 4.6 94.3 POOR 7 53 1.9 5.7 100.0 . 1578 57.9 Missing NOT SURE 8 220 8.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 927 Missing cases 1798 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TVBB6A Q21, Bill Bradley Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 24 .9 3.5 3.5 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 150 5.5 21.7 25.2 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 166 6.1 24.1 49.3 AVERAGE 4 211 7.7 30.6 79.9 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 63 2.3 9.1 89.0 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 29 1.1 4.2 93.2 POOR 7 47 1.7 6.8 100.0 . 1605 58.9 Missing NOT SURE 8 430 15.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 690 Missing cases 2035 TVPB6A Q21, Patrick Buchanan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 54 2.0 5.0 5.0 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 245 9.0 22.6 27.5 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 235 8.6 21.6 49.2 AVERAGE 4 220 8.1 20.3 69.4 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 85 3.1 7.8 77.3 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 78 2.9 7.2 84.4 POOR 7 169 6.2 15.6 100.0 . 1581 58.0 Missing NOT SURE 8 58 2.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1086 Missing cases 1639 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TVBC6A Q21, Bill Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 326 12.0 27.9 27.9 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 437 16.0 37.4 65.4 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 224 8.2 19.2 84.6 AVERAGE 4 96 3.5 8.2 92.8 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 24 .9 2.1 94.9 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 21 .8 1.8 96.7 POOR 7 39 1.4 3.3 100.0 . 1538 56.4 Missing NOT SURE 8 20 .7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1167 Missing cases 1558 TVRD6A Q21, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 20 .7 1.7 1.7 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 126 4.6 11.0 12.7 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 233 8.6 20.3 33.0 AVERAGE 4 328 12.0 28.5 61.5 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 206 7.6 17.9 79.5 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 109 4.0 9.5 88.9 POOR 7 127 4.7 11.1 100.0 . 1556 57.1 Missing NOT SURE 8 20 .7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1149 Missing cases 1576 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TVSF6A Q21, Steve Forbes Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 10 .4 .9 .9 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 81 3.0 7.7 8.6 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 190 7.0 18.0 26.6 AVERAGE 4 262 9.6 24.8 51.5 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 216 7.9 20.5 71.9 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 131 4.8 12.4 84.4 POOR 7 165 6.1 15.6 100.0 . 1576 57.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 94 3.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1055 Missing cases 1670 TVPG6A Q21, Phil Gramm Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 4 .1 .4 .4 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 56 2.1 5.4 5.8 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 153 5.6 14.8 20.6 AVERAGE 4 229 8.4 22.1 42.7 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 200 7.3 19.3 62.0 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 151 5.5 14.6 76.5 POOR 7 243 8.9 23.5 100.0 . 1590 58.3 Missing NOT SURE 8 99 3.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1036 Missing cases 1689 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TVJJ6A Q21, Jesse Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 71 2.6 6.7 6.7 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 209 7.7 19.8 26.6 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 211 7.7 20.0 46.6 AVERAGE 4 195 7.2 18.5 65.1 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 127 4.7 12.1 77.2 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 93 3.4 8.8 86.0 POOR 7 147 5.4 14.0 100.0 . 1588 58.3 Missing NOT SURE 8 84 3.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1053 Missing cases 1672 TVRL6A Q21, Richard Lugar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 6 .2 .7 .7 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 60 2.2 7.4 8.1 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 137 5.0 16.9 25.0 AVERAGE 4 302 11.1 37.2 62.3 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 124 4.6 15.3 77.6 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 85 3.1 10.5 88.0 POOR 7 97 3.6 12.0 100.0 . 1593 58.5 Missing NOT SURE 8 321 11.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 811 Missing cases 1914 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TVHRP6A Q21, H. Ross Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 22 .8 2.1 2.1 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 113 4.1 10.8 12.9 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 177 6.5 17.0 29.9 AVERAGE 4 201 7.4 19.3 49.2 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 161 5.9 15.4 64.6 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 154 5.7 14.8 79.4 POOR 7 215 7.9 20.6 100.0 . 1571 57.7 Missing NOT SURE 8 111 4.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1043 Missing cases 1682 AFFLA6A Q22a, Lamar Alexander Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 10 .4 1.6 1.6 FAVOR 2 29 1.1 4.6 6.2 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 96 3.5 15.3 21.6 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 154 5.7 24.6 46.2 OPPOSE 5 261 9.6 41.7 87.9 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 76 2.8 12.1 100.0 . 1641 60.2 Missing NOT SURE 7 458 16.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 626 Missing cases 2099 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AFFBB6A Q22a, Bill Bradley Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 65 2.4 11.5 11.5 FAVOR 2 248 9.1 44.0 55.5 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 165 6.1 29.3 84.8 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 39 1.4 6.9 91.7 OPPOSE 5 34 1.2 6.0 97.7 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 13 .5 2.3 100.0 . 1654 60.7 Missing NOT SURE 7 507 18.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 564 Missing cases 2161 AFFPB6A Q22a, Patrick Buchanan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 6 .2 .7 .7 FAVOR 2 27 1.0 3.0 3.6 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 41 1.5 4.5 8.1 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 59 2.2 6.4 14.5 OPPOSE 5 180 6.6 19.7 34.2 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 602 22.1 65.8 100.0 . 1635 60.0 Missing NOT SURE 7 175 6.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 915 Missing cases 1810 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AFFBC6A Q22a, Bill Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 333 12.2 32.3 32.3 FAVOR 2 474 17.4 45.9 78.2 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 186 6.8 18.0 96.2 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 23 .8 2.2 98.4 OPPOSE 5 5 .2 .5 98.9 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 11 .4 1.1 100.0 . 1610 59.1 Missing NOT SURE 7 83 3.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1032 Missing cases 1693 AFFRD6A Q22a, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 5 .2 .5 .5 FAVOR 2 65 2.4 6.9 7.4 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 149 5.5 15.8 23.2 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 243 8.9 25.7 48.8 OPPOSE 5 351 12.9 37.1 85.9 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 133 4.9 14.1 100.0 . 1626 59.7 Missing NOT SURE 7 153 5.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 946 Missing cases 1779 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AFFSF6A Q22a, Steve Forbes Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 3 .1 .5 .5 FAVOR 2 35 1.3 5.9 6.4 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 72 2.6 12.2 18.6 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 124 4.6 21.0 39.7 OPPOSE 5 235 8.6 39.8 79.5 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 121 4.4 20.5 100.0 . 1645 60.4 Missing NOT SURE 7 490 18.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 590 Missing cases 2135 AFFPG6A Q22a, Phil Gramm Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 1 .0 .1 .1 FAVOR 2 20 .7 2.5 2.6 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 54 2.0 6.6 9.2 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 87 3.2 10.7 19.9 OPPOSE 5 262 9.6 32.2 52.1 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 390 14.3 47.9 100.0 . 1648 60.5 Missing NOT SURE 7 263 9.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 814 Missing cases 1911 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AFFRL6A Q22a, Richard Lugar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 4 .1 .8 .8 FAVOR 2 30 1.1 5.7 6.4 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 80 2.9 15.1 21.5 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 149 5.5 28.1 49.6 OPPOSE 5 197 7.2 37.2 86.8 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 70 2.6 13.2 100.0 . 1652 60.6 Missing NOT SURE 7 543 19.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 530 Missing cases 2195 AFFHRP6A Q22a, H. Ross Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 7 .3 1.3 1.3 FAVOR 2 28 1.0 5.0 6.3 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 56 2.1 10.0 16.3 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 100 3.7 17.9 34.2 OPPOSE 5 209 7.7 37.5 71.7 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 158 5.8 28.3 100.0 . 1646 60.4 Missing NOT SURE 7 521 19.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 558 Missing cases 2167 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AFFAA6A Q22a, average American voter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 14 .5 1.4 1.4 FAVOR 2 56 2.1 5.6 7.0 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 176 6.5 17.7 24.8 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 336 12.3 33.8 58.6 OPPOSE 5 335 12.3 33.7 92.3 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 76 2.8 7.7 100.0 . 1625 59.6 Missing NOT SURE 7 107 3.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 993 Missing cases 1732 AFFDP6A Q22a, Democratic Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 207 7.6 20.1 20.1 FAVOR 2 499 18.3 48.4 68.5 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 273 10.0 26.5 95.0 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 32 1.2 3.1 98.2 OPPOSE 5 15 .6 1.5 99.6 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 4 .1 .4 100.0 . 1632 59.9 Missing NOT SURE 7 63 2.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1030 Missing cases 1695 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AFFRP6A Q22a, Republican Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 7 .3 .7 .7 FAVOR 2 25 .9 2.5 3.2 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 91 3.3 9.1 12.3 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 184 6.8 18.5 30.8 OPPOSE 5 460 16.9 46.2 77.0 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 229 8.4 23.0 100.0 . 1639 60.1 Missing NOT SURE 7 90 3.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 996 Missing cases 1729 AFFRE6A Q22a, Reform Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 3 .1 1.3 1.3 FAVOR 2 14 .5 6.2 7.5 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 31 1.1 13.7 21.2 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 51 1.9 22.6 43.8 OPPOSE 5 82 3.0 36.3 80.1 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 45 1.7 19.9 100.0 . 1671 61.3 Missing NOT SURE 7 828 30.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 226 Missing cases 2499 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEFLA6A Q22b, Lamar Alexander Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 80 2.9 10.7 10.7 FAVOR 2 374 13.7 50.2 60.9 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 223 8.2 29.9 90.9 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 37 1.4 5.0 95.8 OPPOSE 5 16 .6 2.1 98.0 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 15 .6 2.0 100.0 . 1655 60.7 Missing NOT SURE 7 325 11.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 745 Missing cases 1980 DEFBB6A Q22b, Bill Bradley Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 20 .7 3.5 3.5 FAVOR 2 92 3.4 16.0 19.5 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 127 4.7 22.1 41.6 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 90 3.3 15.7 57.3 OPPOSE 5 181 6.6 31.5 88.9 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 64 2.3 11.1 100.0 . 1666 61.1 Missing NOT SURE 7 485 17.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 574 Missing cases 2151 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEFPB6A Q22b, Patrick Buchanan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 448 16.4 48.0 48.0 FAVOR 2 305 11.2 32.7 80.7 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 97 3.6 10.4 91.1 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 34 1.2 3.6 94.7 OPPOSE 5 17 .6 1.8 96.6 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 32 1.2 3.4 100.0 . 1649 60.5 Missing NOT SURE 7 143 5.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 933 Missing cases 1792 DEFBC6A Q22b, Bill Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 34 1.2 3.2 3.2 FAVOR 2 105 3.9 10.0 13.3 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 147 5.4 14.0 27.3 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 134 4.9 12.8 40.1 OPPOSE 5 314 11.5 30.0 70.0 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 314 11.5 30.0 100.0 . 1625 59.6 Missing NOT SURE 7 52 1.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1048 Missing cases 1677 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEFRD6A Q22b, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 172 6.3 16.6 16.6 FAVOR 2 474 17.4 45.8 62.4 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 279 10.2 26.9 89.3 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 62 2.3 6.0 95.3 OPPOSE 5 30 1.1 2.9 98.2 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 19 .7 1.8 100.0 . 1626 59.7 Missing NOT SURE 7 63 2.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1036 Missing cases 1689 DEFSF6A Q22b, Steve Forbes Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 156 5.7 21.8 21.8 FAVOR 2 318 11.7 44.4 66.1 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 147 5.4 20.5 86.6 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 45 1.7 6.3 92.9 OPPOSE 5 33 1.2 4.6 97.5 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 18 .7 2.5 100.0 . 1667 61.2 Missing NOT SURE 7 341 12.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 717 Missing cases 2008 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEFPG6A Q22b, Phil Gramm Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 375 13.8 43.0 43.0 FAVOR 2 315 11.6 36.1 79.1 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 104 3.8 11.9 91.1 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 29 1.1 3.3 94.4 OPPOSE 5 19 .7 2.2 96.6 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 30 1.1 3.4 100.0 . 1658 60.8 Missing NOT SURE 7 195 7.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 872 Missing cases 1853 DEFRL6A Q22b, Richard Lugar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 73 2.7 11.8 11.8 FAVOR 2 275 10.1 44.4 56.1 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 191 7.0 30.8 86.9 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 39 1.4 6.3 93.2 OPPOSE 5 24 .9 3.9 97.1 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 18 .7 2.9 100.0 . 1661 61.0 Missing NOT SURE 7 444 16.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 620 Missing cases 2105 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEFHRP6A Q22b, H. Ross Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 218 8.0 32.0 32.0 FAVOR 2 278 10.2 40.8 72.7 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 108 4.0 15.8 88.6 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 31 1.1 4.5 93.1 OPPOSE 5 24 .9 3.5 96.6 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 23 .8 3.4 100.0 . 1664 61.1 Missing NOT SURE 7 379 13.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 682 Missing cases 2043 DEFAA6A Q22b, average American voter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 42 1.5 4.3 4.3 FAVOR 2 245 9.0 24.8 29.1 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 384 14.1 38.9 68.0 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 165 6.1 16.7 84.7 OPPOSE 5 128 4.7 13.0 97.7 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 23 .8 2.3 100.0 . 1650 60.6 Missing NOT SURE 7 88 3.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 987 Missing cases 1738 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEFDP6A Q22b, Democratic Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 32 1.2 3.1 3.1 FAVOR 2 86 3.2 8.3 11.5 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 156 5.7 15.1 26.6 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 160 5.9 15.5 42.1 OPPOSE 5 348 12.8 33.8 75.9 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 248 9.1 24.1 100.0 . 1644 60.3 Missing NOT SURE 7 51 1.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1030 Missing cases 1695 DEFRP6A Q22b, Republican Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 302 11.1 29.7 29.7 FAVOR 2 460 16.9 45.2 74.9 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 166 6.1 16.3 91.2 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 38 1.4 3.7 95.0 OPPOSE 5 31 1.1 3.0 98.0 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 20 .7 2.0 100.0 . 1652 60.6 Missing NOT SURE 7 56 2.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1017 Missing cases 1708 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEFRE6A Q22b, Reform Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 35 1.3 16.1 16.1 FAVOR 2 68 2.5 31.3 47.5 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 64 2.3 29.5 77.0 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 22 .8 10.1 87.1 OPPOSE 5 15 .6 6.9 94.0 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 13 .5 6.0 100.0 . 1693 62.1 Missing NOT SURE 7 815 29.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 217 Missing cases 2508 ABORLA6A Q22c, Lamar Alexander Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 41 1.5 7.3 7.3 FAVOR 2 170 6.2 30.4 37.7 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 163 6.0 29.2 66.9 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 71 2.6 12.7 79.6 OPPOSE 5 92 3.4 16.5 96.1 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 22 .8 3.9 100.0 . 1671 61.3 Missing NOT SURE 7 495 18.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 559 Missing cases 2166 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABORBB6A Q22c, Bill Bradley Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 10 .4 2.1 2.1 FAVOR 2 48 1.8 10.0 12.1 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 36 1.3 7.5 19.6 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 43 1.6 9.0 28.6 OPPOSE 5 202 7.4 42.2 70.8 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 140 5.1 29.2 100.0 . 1681 61.7 Missing NOT SURE 7 565 20.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 479 Missing cases 2246 ABORPB6A Q22c, Patrick Buchanan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 715 26.2 75.7 75.7 FAVOR 2 131 4.8 13.9 89.6 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 26 1.0 2.8 92.4 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 12 .4 1.3 93.6 OPPOSE 5 14 .5 1.5 95.1 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 46 1.7 4.9 100.0 . 1658 60.8 Missing NOT SURE 7 123 4.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 944 Missing cases 1781 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABORBC6A Q22c, Bill Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 29 1.1 2.9 2.9 FAVOR 2 48 1.8 4.8 7.7 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 57 2.1 5.7 13.5 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 68 2.5 6.8 20.3 OPPOSE 5 316 11.6 31.8 52.1 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 476 17.5 47.9 100.0 . 1629 59.8 Missing NOT SURE 7 102 3.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 994 Missing cases 1731 ABORRD6A Q22c, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 98 3.6 10.7 10.7 FAVOR 2 354 13.0 38.7 49.4 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 272 10.0 29.7 79.1 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 102 3.7 11.1 90.3 OPPOSE 5 66 2.4 7.2 97.5 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 23 .8 2.5 100.0 . 1643 60.3 Missing NOT SURE 7 167 6.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 915 Missing cases 1810 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABORSF6A Q22c, Steve Forbes Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 38 1.4 6.9 6.9 FAVOR 2 98 3.6 17.9 24.8 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 139 5.1 25.3 50.1 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 119 4.4 21.7 71.8 OPPOSE 5 118 4.3 21.5 93.3 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 37 1.4 6.7 100.0 . 1673 61.4 Missing NOT SURE 7 503 18.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 549 Missing cases 2176 ABORPG6A Q22c, Phil Gramm Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 336 12.3 42.9 42.9 FAVOR 2 271 9.9 34.6 77.5 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 87 3.2 11.1 88.6 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 37 1.4 4.7 93.4 OPPOSE 5 24 .9 3.1 96.4 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 28 1.0 3.6 100.0 . 1664 61.1 Missing NOT SURE 7 278 10.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 783 Missing cases 1942 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABORRL6A Q22c, Richard Lugar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 45 1.7 9.7 9.7 FAVOR 2 137 5.0 29.5 39.1 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 139 5.1 29.9 69.0 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 64 2.3 13.8 82.8 OPPOSE 5 60 2.2 12.9 95.7 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 20 .7 4.3 100.0 . 1666 61.1 Missing NOT SURE 7 594 21.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 465 Missing cases 2260 ABOHRP6A Q22c, H. Ross Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 29 1.1 8.2 8.2 FAVOR 2 71 2.6 20.2 28.4 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 64 2.3 18.2 46.6 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 68 2.5 19.3 65.9 OPPOSE 5 82 3.0 23.3 89.2 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 38 1.4 10.8 100.0 . 1668 61.2 Missing NOT SURE 7 705 25.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 352 Missing cases 2373 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABORAA6A Q22c, average American voter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 17 .6 1.8 1.8 FAVOR 2 105 3.9 10.8 12.6 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 202 7.4 20.8 33.4 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 240 8.8 24.8 58.2 OPPOSE 5 345 12.7 35.6 93.8 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 60 2.2 6.2 100.0 . 1631 59.9 Missing NOT SURE 7 125 4.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 969 Missing cases 1756 ABORDP6A Q22c, Democratic Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 21 .8 2.1 2.1 FAVOR 2 63 2.3 6.3 8.4 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 71 2.6 7.1 15.4 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 115 4.2 11.5 26.9 OPPOSE 5 432 15.9 43.0 69.9 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 302 11.1 30.1 100.0 . 1637 60.1 Missing NOT SURE 7 84 3.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1004 Missing cases 1721 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABORRP6A Q22c, Republican Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 157 5.8 15.9 15.9 FAVOR 2 407 14.9 41.2 57.1 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 285 10.5 28.9 86.0 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 80 2.9 8.1 94.1 OPPOSE 5 35 1.3 3.5 97.7 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 23 .8 2.3 100.0 . 1632 59.9 Missing NOT SURE 7 106 3.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 987 Missing cases 1738 ABORRE6A Q22c, Reform Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 19 .7 10.1 10.1 FAVOR 2 36 1.3 19.1 29.3 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 46 1.7 24.5 53.7 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 43 1.6 22.9 76.6 OPPOSE 5 25 .9 13.3 89.9 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 19 .7 10.1 100.0 . 1680 61.7 Missing NOT SURE 7 857 31.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 188 Missing cases 2537 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INVLA6A Q22d, Lamar Alexander Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 7 .3 1.3 1.3 FAVOR 2 110 4.0 20.9 22.2 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 172 6.3 32.6 54.8 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 114 4.2 21.6 76.5 OPPOSE 5 108 4.0 20.5 97.0 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 16 .6 3.0 100.0 . 1677 61.5 Missing NOT SURE 7 521 19.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 527 Missing cases 2198 INVBB6A Q22d, Bill Bradley Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 11 .4 2.2 2.2 FAVOR 2 43 1.6 8.7 10.9 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 65 2.4 13.1 23.9 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 94 3.4 18.9 42.9 OPPOSE 5 213 7.8 42.9 85.7 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 71 2.6 14.3 100.0 . 1679 61.6 Missing NOT SURE 7 549 20.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 497 Missing cases 2228 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INVPB6A Q22d, Patrick Buchanan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 575 21.1 62.1 62.1 FAVOR 2 190 7.0 20.5 82.6 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 51 1.9 5.5 88.1 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 22 .8 2.4 90.5 OPPOSE 5 43 1.6 4.6 95.1 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 45 1.7 4.9 100.0 . 1657 60.8 Missing NOT SURE 7 142 5.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 926 Missing cases 1799 INVBC6A Q22d, Bill Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 31 1.1 3.1 3.1 FAVOR 2 67 2.5 6.6 9.7 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 52 1.9 5.1 14.8 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 85 3.1 8.4 23.2 OPPOSE 5 375 13.8 37.1 60.3 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 401 14.7 39.7 100.0 . 1636 60.0 Missing NOT SURE 7 78 2.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1011 Missing cases 1714 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INVRD6A Q22d, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 33 1.2 3.5 3.5 FAVOR 2 167 6.1 17.7 21.2 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 219 8.0 23.2 44.4 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 202 7.4 21.4 65.8 OPPOSE 5 246 9.0 26.1 91.8 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 77 2.8 8.2 100.0 . 1648 60.5 Missing NOT SURE 7 133 4.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 944 Missing cases 1781 INVSF6A Q22d, Steve Forbes Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 26 1.0 5.5 5.5 FAVOR 2 94 3.4 19.9 25.4 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 119 4.4 25.2 50.6 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 108 4.0 22.9 73.5 OPPOSE 5 100 3.7 21.2 94.7 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 25 .9 5.3 100.0 . 1678 61.6 Missing NOT SURE 7 575 21.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 472 Missing cases 2253 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INVPG6A Q22d, Phil Gramm Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 139 5.1 20.1 20.1 FAVOR 2 206 7.6 29.7 49.8 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 142 5.2 20.5 70.3 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 80 2.9 11.5 81.8 OPPOSE 5 91 3.3 13.1 94.9 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 35 1.3 5.1 100.0 . 1677 61.5 Missing NOT SURE 7 355 13.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 693 Missing cases 2032 INVRL6A Q22d, Richard Lugar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 17 .6 3.3 3.3 FAVOR 2 82 3.0 15.7 18.9 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 129 4.7 24.7 43.6 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 106 3.9 20.3 63.9 OPPOSE 5 142 5.2 27.2 91.0 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 47 1.7 9.0 100.0 . 1678 61.6 Missing NOT SURE 7 524 19.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 523 Missing cases 2202 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INVHRP6A Q22d, H. Ross Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 91 3.3 17.7 17.7 FAVOR 2 185 6.8 35.9 53.6 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 108 4.0 21.0 74.6 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 54 2.0 10.5 85.0 OPPOSE 5 51 1.9 9.9 95.0 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 26 1.0 5.0 100.0 . 1672 61.4 Missing NOT SURE 7 538 19.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 515 Missing cases 2210 INVAA6A Q22d, average American voter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 58 2.1 6.0 6.0 FAVOR 2 232 8.5 24.2 30.2 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 363 13.3 37.8 68.0 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 176 6.5 18.3 86.4 OPPOSE 5 114 4.2 11.9 98.2 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 17 .6 1.8 100.0 . 1662 61.0 Missing NOT SURE 7 103 3.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 960 Missing cases 1765 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INVDP6A Q22d, Democratic Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 18 .7 1.9 1.9 FAVOR 2 81 3.0 8.7 10.6 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 136 5.0 14.5 25.1 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 218 8.0 23.3 48.4 OPPOSE 5 353 13.0 37.7 86.1 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 130 4.8 13.9 100.0 . 1671 61.3 Missing NOT SURE 7 118 4.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 936 Missing cases 1789 INVRP6A Q22d, Republican Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 59 2.2 6.4 6.4 FAVOR 2 295 10.8 32.1 38.6 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 271 9.9 29.5 68.1 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 144 5.3 15.7 83.8 OPPOSE 5 122 4.5 13.3 97.1 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 27 1.0 2.9 100.0 . 1670 61.3 Missing NOT SURE 7 137 5.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 918 Missing cases 1807 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INVRE6A Q22d, Reform Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 30 1.1 15.8 15.8 FAVOR 2 44 1.6 23.2 38.9 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 60 2.2 31.6 70.5 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 32 1.2 16.8 87.4 OPPOSE 5 15 .6 7.9 95.3 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 9 .3 4.7 100.0 . 1710 62.8 Missing NOT SURE 7 825 30.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 190 Missing cases 2535 DISPTY6A Q23, I dislike both parties Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 313 11.5 27.8 27.8 DISAGREE 2 603 22.1 53.6 81.4 AGREE 3 162 5.9 14.4 95.8 STRONGLY AGREE 4 47 1.7 4.2 100.0 . 1563 57.4 Missing NOT SURE 5 37 1.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1125 Missing cases 1600 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - JBPUOF6A Q23, good a job in public office Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 94 3.4 8.8 8.8 DISAGREE 2 317 11.6 29.7 38.4 AGREE 3 431 15.8 40.3 78.8 STRONGLY AGREE 4 227 8.3 21.2 100.0 . 1559 57.2 Missing NOT SURE 5 97 3.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1069 Missing cases 1656 POLCOM6A Q23, politics/government seem complicate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 301 11.0 25.9 25.9 DISAGREE 2 424 15.6 36.5 62.4 AGREE 3 330 12.1 28.4 90.8 STRONGLY AGREE 4 107 3.9 9.2 100.0 . 1547 56.8 Missing NOT SURE 5 16 .6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1162 Missing cases 1563 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PTYPRO6A Q23, the major parties never deliver Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 44 1.6 3.8 3.8 DISAGREE 2 453 16.6 39.5 43.4 AGREE 3 495 18.2 43.2 86.6 STRONGLY AGREE 4 154 5.7 13.4 100.0 . 1551 56.9 Missing NOT SURE 5 28 1.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1146 Missing cases 1579 RADICA6A Q23, our country needs radical change Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 98 3.6 8.9 8.9 DISAGREE 2 429 15.7 39.0 47.9 AGREE 3 382 14.0 34.7 82.6 STRONGLY AGREE 4 191 7.0 17.4 100.0 . 1569 57.6 Missing NOT SURE 5 56 2.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1100 Missing cases 1625 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TRUPEO6A Q23, most people can be trusted Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 61 2.2 5.5 5.5 DISAGREE 2 323 11.9 29.0 34.4 AGREE 3 655 24.0 58.7 93.2 STRONGLY AGREE 4 76 2.8 6.8 100.0 . 1551 56.9 Missing NOT SURE 5 59 2.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1115 Missing cases 1610 NEIPTY6A Q23, neither pty stands for what is impo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 137 5.0 12.5 12.5 DISAGREE 2 666 24.4 60.6 73.1 AGREE 3 224 8.2 20.4 93.4 STRONGLY AGREE 4 72 2.6 6.6 100.0 . 1573 57.7 Missing NOT SURE 5 53 1.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1099 Missing cases 1626 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EQUAL6A Q23, equal opportunity to succeed Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 81 3.0 7.2 7.2 DISAGREE 2 223 8.2 19.9 27.2 AGREE 3 531 19.5 47.5 74.6 STRONGLY AGREE 4 284 10.4 25.4 100.0 . 1556 57.1 Missing NOT SURE 5 50 1.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1119 Missing cases 1606 VOTPER6A Q23, I vote for person not party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 98 3.6 8.7 8.7 DISAGREE 2 316 11.6 27.9 36.6 AGREE 3 525 19.3 46.4 83.0 STRONGLY AGREE 4 193 7.1 17.0 100.0 . 1574 57.8 Missing NOT SURE 5 19 .7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1132 Missing cases 1593 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LOOKOU6A Q23, people just look out for themselves Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 35 1.3 3.1 3.1 DISAGREE 2 335 12.3 29.6 32.7 AGREE 3 621 22.8 54.9 87.6 STRONGLY AGREE 4 140 5.1 12.4 100.0 . 1552 57.0 Missing NOT SURE 5 42 1.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1131 Missing cases 1594 FAMTIE6A Q23, emphasis on traditional family ties Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 47 1.7 4.2 4.2 DISAGREE 2 168 6.2 14.9 19.1 AGREE 3 489 17.9 43.4 62.5 STRONGLY AGREE 4 422 15.5 37.5 100.0 . 1548 56.8 Missing NOT SURE 5 51 1.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1126 Missing cases 1599 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANPTY6A Q23, I support the candidates of my part Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 57 2.1 5.0 5.0 DISAGREE 2 229 8.4 19.9 24.9 AGREE 3 637 23.4 55.5 80.4 STRONGLY AGREE 4 225 8.3 19.6 100.0 . 1557 57.1 Missing NOT SURE 5 20 .7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1148 Missing cases 1577 WRDGOD6A Q23, the Bible is to be taken literally Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 387 14.2 35.5 35.5 DISAGREE 2 377 13.8 34.6 70.1 AGREE 3 175 6.4 16.1 86.1 STRONGLY AGREE 4 151 5.5 13.9 100.0 . 1550 56.9 Missing NOT SURE 5 85 3.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1090 Missing cases 1635 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DECIMM6A Q23, immigrants decreased Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 73 2.7 7.0 7.0 DISAGREE 2 283 10.4 27.1 34.1 AGREE 3 408 15.0 39.1 73.3 STRONGLY AGREE 4 279 10.2 26.7 100.0 . 1543 56.6 Missing NOT SURE 5 139 5.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1043 Missing cases 1682 ISOLAT6A Q23, no concern with world problems Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 344 12.6 30.6 30.6 DISAGREE 2 597 21.9 53.2 83.8 AGREE 3 112 4.1 10.0 93.8 STRONGLY AGREE 4 70 2.6 6.2 100.0 . 1542 56.6 Missing NOT SURE 5 60 2.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1123 Missing cases 1602 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RUNBB6A Q24, Bill Bradley Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PROBABLY WILL RUN 2 11 .4 1.4 1.4 LIKELY TO RUN 3 10 .4 1.2 2.6 TOSS-UP 4 59 2.2 7.3 9.9 LIKELY NOT TO RUN 5 104 3.8 12.8 22.7 PROBABLY NOT RUN 6 348 12.8 42.9 65.6 CERTAIN NOT TO RUN 7 279 10.2 34.4 100.0 . 1556 57.1 Missing NOT SURE 8 358 13.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 811 Missing cases 1914 RUNJJ6A Q24, Jesse Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO RUN 1 2 .1 .2 .2 PROBABLY WILL RUN 2 28 1.0 2.8 3.0 LIKELY TO RUN 3 47 1.7 4.7 7.7 TOSS-UP 4 119 4.4 11.9 19.7 LIKELY NOT TO RUN 5 145 5.3 14.5 34.2 PROBABLY NOT RUN 6 432 15.9 43.3 77.5 CERTAIN NOT TO RUN 7 224 8.2 22.5 100.0 . 1547 56.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 181 6.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 997 Missing cases 1728 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RUNHRP6A Q24, H. Ross Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO RUN 1 13 .5 1.3 1.3 PROBABLY WILL RUN 2 61 2.2 6.2 7.6 LIKELY TO RUN 3 97 3.6 9.9 17.4 TOSS-UP 4 201 7.4 20.5 38.0 LIKELY NOT TO RUN 5 147 5.4 15.0 53.0 PROBABLY NOT RUN 6 320 11.7 32.7 85.6 CERTAIN NOT TO RUN 7 141 5.2 14.4 100.0 . 1542 56.6 Missing NOT SURE 8 203 7.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 980 Missing cases 1745 RUNOTH6A Q24, other candidate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO RUN 1 4 .1 3.1 3.1 PROBABLY WILL RUN 2 11 .4 8.7 11.8 LIKELY TO RUN 3 11 .4 8.7 20.5 TOSS-UP 4 23 .8 18.1 38.6 LIKELY NOT TO RUN 5 12 .4 9.4 48.0 PROBABLY NOT RUN 6 34 1.2 26.8 74.8 CERTAIN NOT TO RUN 7 32 1.2 25.2 100.0 . 2360 86.6 Missing NOT SURE 8 238 8.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 127 Missing cases 2598 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOMLA6A Q25a, Lamar Alexander Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 4 .1 .4 .4 PROBABLY WILL WIN 2 28 1.0 2.7 3.0 LIKELY TO WIN 3 96 3.5 9.1 12.1 TOSS-UP 4 239 8.8 22.7 34.8 LIKELY TO LOSE 5 211 7.7 20.0 54.8 PROBABLY WILL LOSE 6 229 8.4 21.7 76.6 CERTAIN TO LOSE 7 247 9.1 23.4 100.0 . 1588 58.3 Missing NOT SURE 8 83 3.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1054 Missing cases 1671 NOMPB6A Q25a, Patrick Buchanan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 6 .2 .5 .5 PROBABLY WILL WIN 2 32 1.2 2.9 3.4 LIKELY TO WIN 3 102 3.7 9.2 12.7 TOSS-UP 4 214 7.9 19.3 32.0 LIKELY TO LOSE 5 243 8.9 22.0 54.0 PROBABLY WILL LOSE 6 289 10.6 26.1 80.1 CERTAIN TO LOSE 7 220 8.1 19.9 100.0 . 1576 57.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 43 1.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1106 Missing cases 1619 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOMRD6A Q25a, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 149 5.5 12.8 12.8 PROBABLY WILL WIN 2 462 17.0 39.7 52.5 LIKELY TO WIN 3 279 10.2 24.0 76.5 TOSS-UP 4 173 6.3 14.9 91.4 LIKELY TO LOSE 5 50 1.8 4.3 95.7 PROBABLY WILL LOSE 6 33 1.2 2.8 98.5 CERTAIN TO LOSE 7 17 .6 1.5 100.0 . 1540 56.5 Missing NOT SURE 8 22 .8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1163 Missing cases 1562 NOMSF6A Q25a, Steve Forbes Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 1 .0 .1 .1 PROBABLY WILL WIN 2 15 .6 1.4 1.5 LIKELY TO WIN 3 39 1.4 3.6 5.1 TOSS-UP 4 115 4.2 10.6 15.6 LIKELY TO LOSE 5 234 8.6 21.5 37.1 PROBABLY WILL LOSE 6 320 11.7 29.4 66.5 CERTAIN TO LOSE 7 364 13.4 33.5 100.0 . 1587 58.2 Missing NOT SURE 8 50 1.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1088 Missing cases 1637 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOMPG6A Q25a, Phil Gramm Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PROBABLY WILL WIN 2 3 .1 .3 .3 LIKELY TO WIN 3 17 .6 1.6 1.9 TOSS-UP 4 47 1.7 4.4 6.3 LIKELY TO LOSE 5 126 4.6 11.8 18.1 PROBABLY WILL LOSE 6 225 8.3 21.1 39.2 CERTAIN TO LOSE 7 648 23.8 60.8 100.0 . 1591 58.4 Missing NOT SURE 8 68 2.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1066 Missing cases 1659 NOMRL6A Q25a, Richard Lugar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 1 .0 .1 .1 PROBABLY WILL WIN 2 2 .1 .2 .3 LIKELY TO WIN 3 10 .4 1.0 1.3 TOSS-UP 4 48 1.8 4.8 6.1 LIKELY TO LOSE 5 102 3.7 10.2 16.3 PROBABLY WILL LOSE 6 251 9.2 25.1 41.4 CERTAIN TO LOSE 7 587 21.5 58.6 100.0 . 1585 58.2 Missing NOT SURE 8 139 5.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1001 Missing cases 1724 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOVLA6A Q25b, Lamar Alexander Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 14 .5 1.4 1.4 PROBABLY WILL WIN 2 58 2.1 5.6 7.0 LIKELY TO WIN 3 107 3.9 10.4 17.3 TOSS-UP 4 178 6.5 17.2 34.6 LIKELY TO LOSE 5 170 6.2 16.5 51.1 PROBABLY WILL LOSE 6 201 7.4 19.5 70.5 CERTAIN TO LOSE 7 304 11.2 29.5 100.0 . 1612 59.2 Missing NOT SURE 8 81 3.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1032 Missing cases 1693 NOVPB6A Q25b, Patrick Buchanan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 11 .4 1.0 1.0 PROBABLY WILL WIN 2 40 1.5 3.7 4.8 LIKELY TO WIN 3 59 2.2 5.5 10.3 TOSS-UP 4 124 4.6 11.6 21.8 LIKELY TO LOSE 5 169 6.2 15.8 37.6 PROBABLY WILL LOSE 6 224 8.2 20.9 58.4 CERTAIN TO LOSE 7 446 16.4 41.6 100.0 . 1608 59.0 Missing NOT SURE 8 44 1.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1073 Missing cases 1652 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOVBC6A Q25b, Bill Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 212 7.8 18.8 18.8 PROBABLY WILL WIN 2 377 13.8 33.5 52.3 LIKELY TO WIN 3 224 8.2 19.9 72.2 TOSS-UP 4 182 6.7 16.2 88.4 LIKELY TO LOSE 5 73 2.7 6.5 94.8 PROBABLY WILL LOSE 6 31 1.1 2.8 97.6 CERTAIN TO LOSE 7 27 1.0 2.4 100.0 . 1565 57.4 Missing NOT SURE 8 34 1.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1126 Missing cases 1599 NOVRD6A Q25b, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 48 1.8 4.3 4.3 PROBABLY WILL WIN 2 128 4.7 11.3 15.6 LIKELY TO WIN 3 160 5.9 14.2 29.8 TOSS-UP 4 302 11.1 26.7 56.5 LIKELY TO LOSE 5 276 10.1 24.4 81.0 PROBABLY WILL LOSE 6 133 4.9 11.8 92.7 CERTAIN TO LOSE 7 82 3.0 7.3 100.0 . 1567 57.5 Missing NOT SURE 8 29 1.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1129 Missing cases 1596 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOVSF6A Q25b, Steve Forbes Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 1 .0 .1 .1 PROBABLY WILL WIN 2 21 .8 2.0 2.1 LIKELY TO WIN 3 44 1.6 4.2 6.3 TOSS-UP 4 117 4.3 11.1 17.4 LIKELY TO LOSE 5 181 6.6 17.2 34.7 PROBABLY WILL LOSE 6 247 9.1 23.5 58.2 CERTAIN TO LOSE 7 439 16.1 41.8 100.0 . 1616 59.3 Missing NOT SURE 8 59 2.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1050 Missing cases 1675 NOVPG6A Q25b, Phil Gramm Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 3 .1 .3 .3 PROBABLY WILL WIN 2 17 .6 1.6 1.9 LIKELY TO WIN 3 36 1.3 3.5 5.4 TOSS-UP 4 54 2.0 5.2 10.6 LIKELY TO LOSE 5 111 4.1 10.7 21.4 PROBABLY WILL LOSE 6 189 6.9 18.3 39.6 CERTAIN TO LOSE 7 625 22.9 60.4 100.0 . 1619 59.4 Missing NOT SURE 8 71 2.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1035 Missing cases 1690 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOVRL6A Q25b, Richard Lugar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 5 .2 .5 .5 PROBABLY WILL WIN 2 11 .4 1.1 1.7 LIKELY TO WIN 3 29 1.1 3.0 4.7 TOSS-UP 4 78 2.9 8.1 12.7 LIKELY TO LOSE 5 131 4.8 13.6 26.3 PROBABLY WILL LOSE 6 207 7.6 21.4 47.7 CERTAIN TO LOSE 7 505 18.5 52.3 100.0 . 1609 59.0 Missing NOT SURE 8 150 5.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 966 Missing cases 1759 PCDGE6A Q26a, Dem nominee, general election Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 1 .0 .1 .1 9 1 .0 .1 .2 10 1 .0 .1 .3 20 1 .0 .1 .4 22 2 .1 .2 .6 30 5 .2 .5 1.0 33 2 .1 .2 1.2 34 2 .1 .2 1.4 35 4 .1 .4 1.8 36 1 .0 .1 1.9 37 2 .1 .2 2.1 38 2 .1 .2 2.2 39 5 .2 .5 2.7 40 33 1.2 3.1 5.8 41 7 .3 .7 6.4 42 12 .4 1.1 7.5 43 25 .9 2.3 9.9 44 25 .9 2.3 12.2 45 72 2.6 6.7 18.9 46 20 .7 1.9 20.8 47 27 1.0 2.5 23.3 48 70 2.6 6.5 29.8 49 78 2.9 7.3 37.1 50 34 1.2 3.2 40.3 51 124 4.6 11.6 51.8 52 110 4.0 10.3 62.1 53 39 1.4 3.6 65.7 54 43 1.6 4.0 69.7 55 135 5.0 12.6 82.3 56 14 .5 1.3 83.6 57 13 .5 1.2 84.8 58 16 .6 1.5 86.3 59 3 .1 .3 86.6 60 56 2.1 5.2 91.8 61 1 .0 .1 91.9 62 3 .1 .3 92.2 63 1 .0 .1 92.3 65 18 .7 1.7 93.9 66 7 .3 .7 94.6 67 1 .0 .1 94.7 69 1 .0 .1 94.8 70 8 .3 .7 95.5 72 2 .1 .2 95.7 75 10 .4 .9 96.6 76 1 .0 .1 96.7 77 5 .2 .5 97.2 PCDGE6A Q26a, Dem nominee, general election 78 2 .1 .2 97.4 80 6 .2 .6 97.9 81 1 .0 .1 98.0 83 1 .0 .1 98.1 85 1 .0 .1 98.2 86 1 .0 .1 98.3 87 1 .0 .1 98.4 88 4 .1 .4 98.8 89 1 .0 .1 98.9 90 2 .1 .2 99.1 95 1 .0 .1 99.2 99 9 .3 .8 100.0 . 1652 60.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1073 Missing cases 1652 PCRGE6A Q26b, Rep nominee, general election Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 5 1 .0 .1 .1 10 1 .0 .1 .2 12 1 .0 .1 .3 14 1 .0 .1 .4 20 6 .2 .6 .9 22 6 .2 .6 1.5 25 5 .2 .5 2.0 26 1 .0 .1 2.1 28 1 .0 .1 2.2 30 12 .4 1.1 3.3 31 3 .1 .3 3.6 32 5 .2 .5 4.0 33 7 .3 .7 4.7 34 3 .1 .3 5.0 35 17 .6 1.6 6.6 36 1 .0 .1 6.7 37 3 .1 .3 6.9 38 6 .2 .6 7.5 39 6 .2 .6 8.1 40 67 2.5 6.3 14.3 41 8 .3 .7 15.1 42 19 .7 1.8 16.9 43 21 .8 2.0 18.8 44 46 1.7 4.3 23.1 45 133 4.9 12.5 35.6 46 47 1.7 4.4 40.0 47 39 1.4 3.7 43.7 48 107 3.9 10.0 53.7 49 125 4.6 11.7 65.4 50 39 1.4 3.7 69.1 51 75 2.8 7.0 76.1 52 68 2.5 6.4 82.5 53 23 .8 2.2 84.6 54 16 .6 1.5 86.1 55 58 2.1 5.4 91.6 56 13 .5 1.2 92.8 57 18 .7 1.7 94.5 58 7 .3 .7 95.1 59 4 .1 .4 95.5 60 18 .7 1.7 97.2 61 3 .1 .3 97.5 62 1 .0 .1 97.6 63 2 .1 .2 97.8 65 2 .1 .2 97.9 66 4 .1 .4 98.3 70 2 .1 .2 98.5 PCRGE6A Q26b, Rep nominee, general election 72 1 .0 .1 98.6 75 3 .1 .3 98.9 77 4 .1 .4 99.3 78 1 .0 .1 99.3 80 2 .1 .2 99.5 85 1 .0 .1 99.6 87 1 .0 .1 99.7 90 1 .0 .1 99.8 93 1 .0 .1 99.9 95 1 .0 .1 100.0 . 1658 60.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1067 Missing cases 1658 PCDHRP6A Q27a, Dem nominee, Perot as cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 4 .1 .4 .4 8 1 .0 .1 .5 9 1 .0 .1 .6 10 9 .3 .9 1.5 11 3 .1 .3 1.8 12 1 .0 .1 1.9 15 2 .1 .2 2.1 20 3 .1 .3 2.4 22 2 .1 .2 2.6 24 2 .1 .2 2.8 25 3 .1 .3 3.1 26 2 .1 .2 3.3 28 1 .0 .1 3.4 30 16 .6 1.6 5.0 31 2 .1 .2 5.2 32 1 .0 .1 5.3 33 11 .4 1.1 6.4 34 12 .4 1.2 7.6 35 26 1.0 2.6 10.2 36 6 .2 .6 10.8 37 6 .2 .6 11.4 38 9 .3 .9 12.3 39 17 .6 1.7 14.0 40 100 3.7 10.0 24.1 41 27 1.0 2.7 26.8 42 50 1.8 5.0 31.8 43 51 1.9 5.1 36.9 44 55 2.0 5.5 42.4 45 137 5.0 13.7 56.2 46 44 1.6 4.4 60.6 47 35 1.3 3.5 64.1 48 46 1.7 4.6 68.7 49 27 1.0 2.7 71.4 50 92 3.4 9.2 80.6 51 22 .8 2.2 82.8 52 21 .8 2.1 85.0 53 13 .5 1.3 86.3 54 11 .4 1.1 87.4 55 39 1.4 3.9 91.3 56 5 .2 .5 91.8 57 5 .2 .5 92.3 58 3 .1 .3 92.6 59 3 .1 .3 92.9 60 32 1.2 3.2 96.1 63 1 .0 .1 96.2 64 2 .1 .2 96.4 PCDHRP6A Q27a, Dem nominee, Perot as cand 65 2 .1 .2 96.6 66 6 .2 .6 97.2 67 1 .0 .1 97.3 68 2 .1 .2 97.5 70 6 .2 .6 98.1 75 2 .1 .2 98.3 77 2 .1 .2 98.5 79 1 .0 .1 98.6 80 5 .2 .5 99.1 82 1 .0 .1 99.2 88 2 .1 .2 99.4 90 2 .1 .2 99.6 95 1 .0 .1 99.7 99 3 .1 .3 100.0 . 1728 63.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 997 Missing cases 1728 PCRHRP6A Q27b, Rep nominee, Perot as cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 5 .2 .5 .5 1 1 .0 .1 .6 5 1 .0 .1 .7 10 6 .2 .6 1.3 11 2 .1 .2 1.5 12 1 .0 .1 1.6 14 1 .0 .1 1.7 16 1 .0 .1 1.8 20 18 .7 1.8 3.6 22 7 .3 .7 4.3 24 2 .1 .2 4.5 25 20 .7 2.0 6.6 26 3 .1 .3 6.9 27 3 .1 .3 7.2 28 4 .1 .4 7.6 29 4 .1 .4 8.0 30 75 2.8 7.6 15.5 31 7 .3 .7 16.2 32 16 .6 1.6 17.9 33 36 1.3 3.6 21.5 34 17 .6 1.7 23.2 35 83 3.0 8.4 31.6 36 23 .8 2.3 33.9 37 19 .7 1.9 35.8 38 35 1.3 3.5 39.4 39 35 1.3 3.5 42.9 40 179 6.6 18.1 60.9 41 42 1.5 4.2 65.2 42 48 1.8 4.8 70.0 43 41 1.5 4.1 74.2 44 40 1.5 4.0 78.2 45 75 2.8 7.6 85.8 46 20 .7 2.0 87.8 47 7 .3 .7 88.5 48 18 .7 1.8 90.3 49 14 .5 1.4 91.7 50 39 1.4 3.9 95.7 51 6 .2 .6 96.3 52 6 .2 .6 96.9 53 2 .1 .2 97.1 54 3 .1 .3 97.4 55 13 .5 1.3 98.7 56 1 .0 .1 98.8 58 1 .0 .1 98.9 60 2 .1 .2 99.1 65 1 .0 .1 99.2 PCRHRP6A Q27b, Rep nominee, Perot as cand 69 1 .0 .1 99.3 70 1 .0 .1 99.4 72 2 .1 .2 99.6 76 1 .0 .1 99.7 80 1 .0 .1 99.8 86 1 .0 .1 99.9 91 1 .0 .1 100.0 . 1734 63.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 991 Missing cases 1734 PCHRP6A Q27c, H. Ross Perot, Perot as cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 37 1.4 3.7 3.7 1 8 .3 .8 4.5 2 9 .3 .9 5.4 3 11 .4 1.1 6.5 4 8 .3 .8 7.3 5 33 1.2 3.3 10.6 6 15 .6 1.5 12.1 7 12 .4 1.2 13.3 8 22 .8 2.2 15.5 9 26 1.0 2.6 18.2 10 181 6.6 18.2 36.3 11 40 1.5 4.0 40.3 12 62 2.3 6.2 46.5 13 21 .8 2.1 48.6 14 29 1.1 2.9 51.6 15 120 4.4 12.0 63.6 16 22 .8 2.2 65.8 17 10 .4 1.0 66.8 18 30 1.1 3.0 69.8 19 16 .6 1.6 71.4 20 119 4.4 11.9 83.4 21 13 .5 1.3 84.7 22 20 .7 2.0 86.7 23 11 .4 1.1 87.8 24 8 .3 .8 88.6 25 36 1.3 3.6 92.2 26 1 .0 .1 92.3 27 5 .2 .5 92.8 28 4 .1 .4 93.2 29 2 .1 .2 93.4 30 26 1.0 2.6 96.0 31 3 .1 .3 96.3 32 4 .1 .4 96.7 33 8 .3 .8 97.5 34 2 .1 .2 97.7 35 3 .1 .3 98.0 36 3 .1 .3 98.3 39 1 .0 .1 98.4 40 4 .1 .4 98.8 44 2 .1 .2 99.0 46 1 .0 .1 99.1 48 1 .0 .1 99.2 55 3 .1 .3 99.5 58 1 .0 .1 99.6 60 1 .0 .1 99.7 66 2 .1 .2 99.9 PCHRP6A Q27c, H. Ross Perot, Perot as cand 88 1 .0 .1 100.0 . 1728 63.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 997 Missing cases 1728 PCDJJ6A Q28a, Dem nominee, Jackson as cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 5 .2 .5 .5 5 1 .0 .1 .6 9 1 .0 .1 .7 10 7 .3 .7 1.4 11 3 .1 .3 1.8 12 2 .1 .2 2.0 15 1 .0 .1 2.1 20 5 .2 .5 2.6 22 4 .1 .4 3.0 23 2 .1 .2 3.2 24 1 .0 .1 3.3 25 6 .2 .6 3.9 27 2 .1 .2 4.1 28 2 .1 .2 4.3 29 4 .1 .4 4.8 30 38 1.4 3.9 8.7 31 1 .0 .1 8.8 32 9 .3 .9 9.7 33 17 .6 1.8 11.5 34 9 .3 .9 12.4 35 51 1.9 5.3 17.7 36 7 .3 .7 18.4 37 12 .4 1.2 19.7 38 12 .4 1.2 20.9 39 27 1.0 2.8 23.7 40 131 4.8 13.6 37.3 41 30 1.1 3.1 40.4 42 36 1.3 3.7 44.1 43 35 1.3 3.6 47.7 44 51 1.9 5.3 53.0 45 94 3.4 9.7 62.7 46 27 1.0 2.8 65.5 47 33 1.2 3.4 68.9 48 35 1.3 3.6 72.6 49 19 .7 2.0 74.5 50 95 3.5 9.8 84.4 51 19 .7 2.0 86.3 52 9 .3 .9 87.3 53 11 .4 1.1 88.4 54 9 .3 .9 89.3 55 34 1.2 3.5 92.9 56 3 .1 .3 93.2 57 4 .1 .4 93.6 58 3 .1 .3 93.9 59 1 .0 .1 94.0 60 20 .7 2.1 96.1 PCDJJ6A Q28a, Dem nominee, Jackson as cand 62 2 .1 .2 96.3 63 1 .0 .1 96.4 64 1 .0 .1 96.5 65 3 .1 .3 96.8 66 3 .1 .3 97.1 67 1 .0 .1 97.2 68 1 .0 .1 97.3 69 1 .0 .1 97.4 70 11 .4 1.1 98.6 75 3 .1 .3 98.9 77 1 .0 .1 99.0 80 3 .1 .3 99.3 87 1 .0 .1 99.4 88 3 .1 .3 99.7 90 1 .0 .1 99.8 99 2 .1 .2 100.0 . 1759 64.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 966 Missing cases 1759 PCRJJ6A Q28b, Rep nominee, Jackson as cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 7 .3 .7 .7 5 3 .1 .3 1.0 8 1 .0 .1 1.1 9 1 .0 .1 1.2 10 4 .1 .4 1.7 11 5 .2 .5 2.2 13 1 .0 .1 2.3 15 3 .1 .3 2.6 16 1 .0 .1 2.7 20 15 .6 1.6 4.3 21 1 .0 .1 4.4 22 8 .3 .8 5.2 23 3 .1 .3 5.5 24 1 .0 .1 5.6 25 13 .5 1.3 7.0 26 1 .0 .1 7.1 27 2 .1 .2 7.3 28 1 .0 .1 7.4 29 2 .1 .2 7.6 30 38 1.4 3.9 11.5 31 4 .1 .4 11.9 32 6 .2 .6 12.6 33 8 .3 .8 13.4 34 5 .2 .5 13.9 35 38 1.4 3.9 17.8 36 7 .3 .7 18.6 37 11 .4 1.1 19.7 38 14 .5 1.5 21.2 39 8 .3 .8 22.0 40 105 3.9 10.9 32.9 41 19 .7 2.0 34.9 42 24 .9 2.5 37.3 43 30 1.1 3.1 40.5 44 52 1.9 5.4 45.9 45 104 3.8 10.8 56.6 46 31 1.1 3.2 59.9 47 36 1.3 3.7 63.6 48 63 2.3 6.5 70.1 49 34 1.2 3.5 73.7 50 95 3.5 9.9 83.5 51 31 1.1 3.2 86.7 52 29 1.1 3.0 89.7 53 13 .5 1.3 91.1 54 5 .2 .5 91.6 55 37 1.4 3.8 95.4 56 8 .3 .8 96.3 PCRJJ6A Q28b, Rep nominee, Jackson as cand 57 4 .1 .4 96.7 58 3 .1 .3 97.0 59 1 .0 .1 97.1 60 11 .4 1.1 98.2 61 3 .1 .3 98.5 63 1 .0 .1 98.7 65 1 .0 .1 98.8 66 3 .1 .3 99.1 67 1 .0 .1 99.2 70 1 .0 .1 99.3 72 1 .0 .1 99.4 75 2 .1 .2 99.6 77 1 .0 .1 99.7 80 1 .0 .1 99.8 88 1 .0 .1 99.9 90 1 .0 .1 100.0 . 1761 64.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 964 Missing cases 1761 PCJJ6A Q28c, Jesse Jackson, Jackson as cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 63 2.3 6.6 6.6 1 19 .7 2.0 8.5 2 26 1.0 2.7 11.3 3 21 .8 2.2 13.4 4 24 .9 2.5 15.9 5 96 3.5 10.0 25.9 6 28 1.0 2.9 28.9 7 21 .8 2.2 31.0 8 40 1.5 4.2 35.2 9 20 .7 2.1 37.3 10 202 7.4 21.0 58.3 11 34 1.2 3.5 61.9 12 36 1.3 3.8 65.6 13 13 .5 1.4 67.0 14 17 .6 1.8 68.8 15 87 3.2 9.1 77.8 16 11 .4 1.1 79.0 17 10 .4 1.0 80.0 18 13 .5 1.4 81.4 19 7 .3 .7 82.1 20 70 2.6 7.3 89.4 21 2 .1 .2 89.6 22 15 .6 1.6 91.1 23 8 .3 .8 92.0 24 5 .2 .5 92.5 25 24 .9 2.5 95.0 26 1 .0 .1 95.1 27 1 .0 .1 95.2 28 3 .1 .3 95.5 30 22 .8 2.3 97.8 31 1 .0 .1 97.9 32 1 .0 .1 98.0 33 6 .2 .6 98.6 34 1 .0 .1 98.8 35 4 .1 .4 99.2 36 1 .0 .1 99.3 40 1 .0 .1 99.4 44 1 .0 .1 99.5 50 1 .0 .1 99.6 52 1 .0 .1 99.7 77 2 .1 .2 99.9 88 1 .0 .1 100.0 . 1765 64.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 960 Missing cases 1765 PCDBB6A Q29a, Dem nominee, Bradley as cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 9 .3 1.0 1.0 5 1 .0 .1 1.1 9 1 .0 .1 1.3 10 4 .1 .5 1.7 11 3 .1 .3 2.1 12 1 .0 .1 2.2 20 2 .1 .2 2.4 21 2 .1 .2 2.6 22 4 .1 .5 3.1 23 1 .0 .1 3.2 24 2 .1 .2 3.4 25 7 .3 .8 4.2 28 2 .1 .2 4.4 29 2 .1 .2 4.7 30 38 1.4 4.3 9.0 31 2 .1 .2 9.2 32 8 .3 .9 10.1 33 12 .4 1.4 11.5 34 9 .3 1.0 12.5 35 57 2.1 6.5 19.0 36 5 .2 .6 19.6 37 12 .4 1.4 21.0 38 20 .7 2.3 23.3 39 21 .8 2.4 25.7 40 99 3.6 11.3 36.9 41 22 .8 2.5 39.5 42 35 1.3 4.0 43.4 43 31 1.1 3.5 47.0 44 35 1.3 4.0 51.0 45 79 2.9 9.0 60.0 46 34 1.2 3.9 63.9 47 21 .8 2.4 66.2 48 33 1.2 3.8 70.0 49 17 .6 1.9 71.9 50 83 3.0 9.5 81.4 51 21 .8 2.4 83.8 52 21 .8 2.4 86.2 53 8 .3 .9 87.1 54 8 .3 .9 88.0 55 36 1.3 4.1 92.1 56 5 .2 .6 92.7 57 4 .1 .5 93.2 58 2 .1 .2 93.4 59 1 .0 .1 93.5 60 20 .7 2.3 95.8 61 1 .0 .1 95.9 PCDBB6A Q29a, Dem nominee, Bradley as cand 63 1 .0 .1 96.0 64 2 .1 .2 96.2 65 3 .1 .3 96.6 66 1 .0 .1 96.7 67 1 .0 .1 96.8 68 2 .1 .2 97.0 69 1 .0 .1 97.1 70 5 .2 .6 97.7 72 1 .0 .1 97.8 74 2 .1 .2 98.1 75 4 .1 .5 98.5 77 1 .0 .1 98.6 80 6 .2 .7 99.3 88 2 .1 .2 99.5 90 2 .1 .2 99.8 99 2 .1 .2 100.0 . 1848 67.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 877 Missing cases 1848 PCRBB6A Q29b, Rep nominee, Bradley as cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 9 .3 1.0 1.0 5 1 .0 .1 1.1 7 1 .0 .1 1.3 10 7 .3 .8 2.1 11 3 .1 .3 2.4 12 1 .0 .1 2.5 14 1 .0 .1 2.6 15 3 .1 .3 3.0 20 12 .4 1.4 4.3 21 2 .1 .2 4.6 22 4 .1 .5 5.0 23 3 .1 .3 5.4 24 4 .1 .5 5.8 25 16 .6 1.8 7.6 26 3 .1 .3 8.0 27 4 .1 .5 8.4 28 1 .0 .1 8.5 29 2 .1 .2 8.8 30 42 1.5 4.8 13.6 31 4 .1 .5 14.0 32 11 .4 1.3 15.3 33 16 .6 1.8 17.1 34 6 .2 .7 17.8 35 39 1.4 4.4 22.2 36 7 .3 .8 23.0 37 7 .3 .8 23.8 38 15 .6 1.7 25.5 39 10 .4 1.1 26.7 40 112 4.1 12.8 39.4 41 20 .7 2.3 41.7 42 35 1.3 4.0 45.7 43 27 1.0 3.1 48.7 44 42 1.5 4.8 53.5 45 109 4.0 12.4 65.9 46 40 1.5 4.6 70.5 47 34 1.2 3.9 74.4 48 35 1.3 4.0 78.4 49 26 1.0 3.0 81.3 50 62 2.3 7.1 88.4 51 15 .6 1.7 90.1 52 20 .7 2.3 92.4 53 5 .2 .6 92.9 54 12 .4 1.4 94.3 55 25 .9 2.8 97.2 56 3 .1 .3 97.5 57 1 .0 .1 97.6 PCRBB6A Q29b, Rep nominee, Bradley as cand 58 2 .1 .2 97.8 59 1 .0 .1 97.9 60 10 .4 1.1 99.1 65 2 .1 .2 99.3 70 1 .0 .1 99.4 72 1 .0 .1 99.5 77 1 .0 .1 99.7 80 1 .0 .1 99.8 88 2 .1 .2 100.0 . 1847 67.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 878 Missing cases 1847 PCBB6A Q29c, Bill Bradley, Bradley as cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent -5 14 .5 1.6 1.6 0 89 3.3 10.2 11.8 1 30 1.1 3.4 15.2 2 34 1.2 3.9 19.1 3 19 .7 2.2 21.3 4 10 .4 1.1 22.5 5 70 2.6 8.0 30.5 6 17 .6 1.9 32.4 7 17 .6 1.9 34.4 8 19 .7 2.2 36.5 9 11 .4 1.3 37.8 10 150 5.5 17.2 55.0 11 18 .7 2.1 57.0 12 35 1.3 4.0 61.1 13 12 .4 1.4 62.4 14 11 .4 1.3 63.7 15 64 2.3 7.3 71.0 16 13 .5 1.5 72.5 17 1 .0 .1 72.6 18 11 .4 1.3 73.9 19 9 .3 1.0 74.9 20 73 2.7 8.4 83.3 21 8 .3 .9 84.2 22 18 .7 2.1 86.3 23 2 .1 .2 86.5 24 5 .2 .6 87.1 25 27 1.0 3.1 90.1 26 4 .1 .5 90.6 28 5 .2 .6 91.2 29 2 .1 .2 91.4 30 34 1.2 3.9 95.3 32 6 .2 .7 96.0 33 6 .2 .7 96.7 34 2 .1 .2 96.9 35 10 .4 1.1 98.1 36 2 .1 .2 98.3 38 1 .0 .1 98.4 40 6 .2 .7 99.1 45 4 .1 .5 99.5 50 1 .0 .1 99.7 60 1 .0 .1 99.8 64 1 .0 .1 99.9 66 1 .0 .1 100.0 . 1852 68.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 PCBB6A Q29c, Bill Bradley, Bradley as cand Valid cases 873 Missing cases 1852 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEMVOT6A Q30a, Democratic primary or caucus Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BILL CLINTON 1 662 24.3 83.0 83.0 OTHER/WRITE-IN 2 136 5.0 17.0 100.0 . 1927 70.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 798 Missing cases 1927 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - REPVOT6A Q30b, Republican primary or caucus Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent LAMAR ALEXANDER 1 195 7.2 21.0 21.0 PATRICK BUCHANAN 2 104 3.8 11.2 32.2 ROBERT DOLE 3 390 14.3 42.0 74.2 STEVE FORBES 4 65 2.4 7.0 81.3 PHIL GRAMM 5 20 .7 2.2 83.4 RICHARD LUGAR 6 64 2.3 6.9 90.3 OTHER/WRITE-IN 7 90 3.3 9.7 100.0 . 1797 65.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 928 Missing cases 1797 SERLA6A Q31, Lamar Alexander Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1050 38.5 67.7 67.7 CHECKED 1 502 18.4 32.3 100.0 . 1173 43.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1552 Missing cases 1173 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SERPB6A Q31, Pat Buchanan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 798 29.3 51.4 51.4 CHECKED 1 754 27.7 48.6 100.0 . 1173 43.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1552 Missing cases 1173 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SERRD6A Q31, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1157 42.5 74.5 74.5 CHECKED 1 395 14.5 25.5 100.0 . 1173 43.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1552 Missing cases 1173 SERSF6A Q31, Steve Forbes Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 864 31.7 55.7 55.7 CHECKED 1 688 25.2 44.3 100.0 . 1173 43.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1552 Missing cases 1173 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SERPG6A Q31, Phil Gramm Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 825 30.3 53.2 53.2 CHECKED 1 727 26.7 46.8 100.0 . 1173 43.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1552 Missing cases 1173 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SERRL6A Q31, Richard Lugar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 911 33.4 58.7 58.7 CHECKED 1 641 23.5 41.3 100.0 . 1173 43.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1552 Missing cases 1173 RNKLA6A Q32, Lamar Alexander Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST CHOICE 1 105 3.9 14.3 14.3 SECOND CHOICE 2 201 7.4 27.3 41.6 THIRD CHOICE 3 241 8.8 32.8 74.4 FOURTH CHOICE 4 188 6.9 25.6 100.0 . 1990 73.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 735 Missing cases 1990 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RNKBB6A Q32, Bill Bradley Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST CHOICE 1 39 1.4 8.4 8.4 SECOND CHOICE 2 209 7.7 45.0 53.4 THIRD CHOICE 3 79 2.9 17.0 70.5 FOURTH CHOICE 4 137 5.0 29.5 100.0 . 2261 83.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 464 Missing cases 2261 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RNKPB6A Q32, Patrick Buchanan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST CHOICE 1 77 2.8 19.2 19.2 SECOND CHOICE 2 92 3.4 22.9 42.1 THIRD CHOICE 3 94 3.4 23.4 65.6 FOURTH CHOICE 4 138 5.1 34.4 100.0 . 2324 85.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 401 Missing cases 2324 RNKBC6A Q32, Bill Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST CHOICE 1 585 21.5 78.2 78.2 SECOND CHOICE 2 71 2.6 9.5 87.7 THIRD CHOICE 3 35 1.3 4.7 92.4 FOURTH CHOICE 4 57 2.1 7.6 100.0 . 1977 72.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 748 Missing cases 1977 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RNKRD6A Q32, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST CHOICE 1 287 10.5 33.9 33.9 SECOND CHOICE 2 238 8.7 28.1 62.1 THIRD CHOICE 3 166 6.1 19.6 81.7 FOURTH CHOICE 4 155 5.7 18.3 100.0 . 1879 69.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 846 Missing cases 1879 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RNKSF6A Q32, Steve Forbes Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST CHOICE 1 37 1.4 9.5 9.5 SECOND CHOICE 2 84 3.1 21.6 31.1 THIRD CHOICE 3 118 4.3 30.3 61.4 FOURTH CHOICE 4 150 5.5 38.6 100.0 . 2336 85.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 389 Missing cases 2336 RNKPG6A Q32, Phil Gramm Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST CHOICE 1 36 1.3 9.8 9.8 SECOND CHOICE 2 79 2.9 21.6 31.4 THIRD CHOICE 3 94 3.4 25.7 57.1 FOURTH CHOICE 4 157 5.8 42.9 100.0 . 2359 86.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 366 Missing cases 2359 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RNKJJ6A Q32, Jesse Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST CHOICE 1 9 .3 3.3 3.3 SECOND CHOICE 2 57 2.1 20.9 24.2 THIRD CHOICE 3 95 3.5 34.8 59.0 FOURTH CHOICE 4 112 4.1 41.0 100.0 . 2452 90.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 273 Missing cases 2452 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RNKRL6A Q32, Richard Lugar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST CHOICE 1 31 1.1 6.6 6.6 SECOND CHOICE 2 67 2.5 14.3 20.9 THIRD CHOICE 3 137 5.0 29.2 50.1 FOURTH CHOICE 4 234 8.6 49.9 100.0 . 2256 82.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 469 Missing cases 2256 RNKHRP6A Q32, H. Ross Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST CHOICE 1 9 .3 4.1 4.1 SECOND CHOICE 2 27 1.0 12.4 16.6 THIRD CHOICE 3 46 1.7 21.2 37.8 FOURTH CHOICE 4 135 5.0 62.2 100.0 . 2508 92.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 217 Missing cases 2508 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - POLIND6A Q33, Are you a political independent? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 538 19.7 44.3 44.3 NO 2 677 24.8 55.7 100.0 . 1510 55.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1215 Missing cases 1510 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - STIND6A Q33a, If so, how strongly independent? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY STRONGLY 1 203 7.4 29.7 29.7 NOT SO STRONGLY 2 323 11.9 47.3 77.0 NOT AT ALL STRONG 3 157 5.8 23.0 100.0 . 2042 74.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 683 Missing cases 2042 SCHOOL6A Q34, formal schooling completed Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0-8 YEARS 1 14 .5 1.2 1.2 9-11 YEARS 2 29 1.1 2.4 3.6 12 YEARS 3 229 8.4 19.2 22.9 13-15 YEARS 4 274 10.1 23.0 45.9 COLLEGE GRADUATE 5 304 11.2 25.5 71.4 GRADUATE SCHOOL 6 340 12.5 28.6 100.0 . 1535 56.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1190 Missing cases 1535 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AGE6A Q35, age Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 25-29 2 2 .1 .2 .2 30-39 3 59 2.2 4.8 5.0 40-49 4 138 5.1 11.2 16.2 50-59 5 255 9.4 20.8 37.0 60-64 6 169 6.2 13.8 50.8 65 AND OLDER 7 604 22.2 49.2 100.0 . 1498 55.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1227 Missing cases 1498 SEX6A Q36, sex Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MALE 1 655 24.0 53.3 53.3 FEMALE 2 574 21.1 46.7 100.0 . 1496 54.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1229 Missing cases 1496 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RACE6A Q37, race Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent WHITE 1 1133 41.6 92.7 92.7 BLACK/AFRICAN-AMERIC 2 63 2.3 5.2 97.9 ASIAN-AMERICAN 3 2 .1 .2 98.0 HISPANIC/LATINO 4 1 .0 .1 98.1 NATIVE AMERICAN 5 4 .1 .3 98.4 OTHER/WRITE-IN 6 19 .7 1.6 100.0 . 1503 55.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1222 Missing cases 1503 INCOME6A Q38, approx family income before taxes Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNDER $20,000 1 131 4.8 11.3 11.3 $20,000-39,999 2 350 12.8 30.1 41.4 $40,000-59,999 3 290 10.6 24.9 66.3 $60,000-79,999 4 181 6.6 15.6 81.9 $80,000-99,999 5 87 3.2 7.5 89.3 OVER $100,000 6 124 4.6 10.7 100.0 . 1562 57.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1163 Missing cases 1562 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - REL6A Q39, religious preference Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CATHOLIC 1 232 8.5 19.0 19.0 JEWISH 2 16 .6 1.3 20.3 PROTESTANT (INCLUDIN 3 821 30.1 67.2 87.6 NO RELIGIOUS PREFERE 4 102 3.7 8.4 95.9 OTHER/WRITE-IN 5 50 1.8 4.1 100.0 . 1504 55.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1221 Missing cases 1504 HOWREL6A Q40, How religious are you? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY RELIGIOUS 1 280 10.3 23.2 23.2 FAIRLY RELIGIOUS 2 674 24.7 55.9 79.2 NOT VERY RELIGIOUS 3 167 6.1 13.9 93.0 NOT RELIGIOUS AT ALL 4 84 3.1 7.0 100.0 . 1509 55.4 Missing NOT SURE 5 11 .4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1205 Missing cases 1520 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BNAG6A Q41, Are you a born-again Christian? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 305 11.2 25.7 25.7 NO 2 883 32.4 74.3 100.0 . 1537 56.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1188 Missing cases 1537 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CHRIST6A Q42, Are you a fundamentalist Christian? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 155 5.7 13.2 13.2 NO 2 1015 37.2 86.8 100.0 . 1555 57.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1170 Missing cases 1555 TAXCAM6A Q43, regularly mark the contributions bo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 542 19.9 45.2 45.2 NO 2 658 24.1 54.8 100.0 . 1525 56.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1200 Missing cases 1525 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FIRST6A ranking - first choice for president Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Lamar Alexander 1.00 99 3.6 8.3 8.3 Bill Bradley 2.00 37 1.4 3.1 11.4 Patrick Buchanan 3.00 72 2.6 6.0 17.4 Bill Clinton 4.00 577 21.2 48.4 65.9 Robert Dole 5.00 285 10.5 23.9 89.8 Steve Forbes 6.00 37 1.4 3.1 92.9 Phil Gramm 7.00 36 1.3 3.0 95.9 Jesse Jackson 8.00 9 .3 .8 96.6 Richard Lugar 9.00 31 1.1 2.6 99.2 H. Ross Perot 10.00 9 .3 .8 100.0 . 1533 56.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1192 Missing cases 1533 SECOND6A ranking - second choice for president Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Lamar Alexander 1.00 197 7.2 17.9 17.9 Bill Bradley 2.00 204 7.5 18.6 36.5 Patrick Buchanan 3.00 89 3.3 8.1 44.6 Bill Clinton 4.00 67 2.5 6.1 50.7 Robert Dole 5.00 233 8.6 21.2 71.9 Steve Forbes 6.00 80 2.9 7.3 79.2 Phil Gramm 7.00 77 2.8 7.0 86.2 Jesse Jackson 8.00 57 2.1 5.2 91.4 Richard Lugar 9.00 67 2.5 6.1 97.5 H. Ross Perot 10.00 27 1.0 2.5 100.0 . 1627 59.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1098 Missing cases 1627 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - THIRD6A ranking - third choice for president Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Lamar Alexander 1.00 221 8.1 21.3 21.3 Bill Bradley 2.00 73 2.7 7.0 28.4 Patrick Buchanan 3.00 80 2.9 7.7 36.1 Bill Clinton 4.00 34 1.2 3.3 39.3 Robert Dole 5.00 155 5.7 14.9 54.3 Steve Forbes 6.00 113 4.1 10.9 65.2 Phil Gramm 7.00 87 3.2 8.4 73.6 Jesse Jackson 8.00 94 3.4 9.1 82.6 Richard Lugar 9.00 134 4.9 12.9 95.6 H. Ross Perot 10.00 46 1.7 4.4 100.0 . 1688 61.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1037 Missing cases 1688 FOURTH6A ranking - fourth choice for president Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Lamar Alexander 1.00 135 5.0 13.8 13.8 Bill Bradley 2.00 75 2.8 7.6 21.4 Patrick Buchanan 3.00 85 3.1 8.7 30.1 Bill Clinton 4.00 35 1.3 3.6 33.6 Robert Dole 5.00 117 4.3 11.9 45.6 Steve Forbes 6.00 90 3.3 9.2 54.7 Phil Gramm 7.00 85 3.1 8.7 63.4 Jesse Jackson 8.00 45 1.7 4.6 68.0 Richard Lugar 9.00 179 6.6 18.2 86.2 H. Ross Perot 10.00 135 5.0 13.8 100.0 . 1744 64.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 981 Missing cases 1744 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONTH6A Q44, month Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 2 .1 .2 .2 2 1025 37.6 83.8 84.0 3 96 3.5 7.8 91.8 4 79 2.9 6.5 98.3 5 17 .6 1.4 99.7 6 1 .0 .1 99.8 8 1 .0 .1 99.8 12 2 .1 .2 100.0 . 1502 55.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1223 Missing cases 1502 DAY6A Q44, day Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent -9 1 .0 .1 .1 -7 1 .0 .1 .2 -5 1 .0 .1 .3 -4 2 .1 .2 .4 -2 1 .0 .1 .5 -1 2 .1 .2 .7 1 15 .6 1.3 1.9 2 14 .5 1.2 3.1 3 10 .4 .8 3.9 4 3 .1 .3 4.2 5 11 .4 .9 5.1 6 7 .3 .6 5.7 7 5 .2 .4 6.1 8 6 .2 .5 6.6 9 6 .2 .5 7.1 10 4 .1 .3 7.5 11 15 .6 1.3 8.7 12 213 7.8 17.9 26.6 13 182 6.7 15.3 41.8 14 104 3.8 8.7 50.5 15 62 2.3 5.2 55.7 16 67 2.5 5.6 61.4 17 56 2.1 4.7 66.1 18 42 1.5 3.5 69.6 19 60 2.2 5.0 74.6 20 36 1.3 3.0 77.6 21 31 1.1 2.6 80.2 22 51 1.9 4.3 84.5 23 33 1.2 2.8 87.3 24 40 1.5 3.4 90.6 25 25 .9 2.1 92.7 26 27 1.0 2.3 95.0 27 23 .8 1.9 96.9 28 20 .7 1.7 98.6 29 15 .6 1.3 99.8 30 1 .0 .1 99.9 31 1 .0 .1 100.0 . 1532 56.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1193 Missing cases 1532 YEAR6A Q44, year Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent -2 1 .0 .1 .1 6 1 .0 .1 .2 15 3 .1 .3 .4 17 2 .1 .2 .6 19 1 .0 .1 .7 26 1 .0 .1 .8 32 1 .0 .1 .8 46 1 .0 .1 .9 55 1 .0 .1 1.0 86 2 .1 .2 1.2 92 1 .0 .1 1.3 94 2 .1 .2 1.4 95 3 .1 .3 1.7 96 1172 43.0 98.2 99.8 97 1 .0 .1 99.9 98 1 .0 .1 100.0 . 1531 56.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1194 Missing cases 1531 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RESPON6A wave response variable Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NO .00 310 11.4 20.0 20.0 YES 1.00 1242 45.6 80.0 100.0 . 1173 43.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1552 Missing cases 1173 STUDY6A study identification variable Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent newcaucpan84 8.00 1552 57.0 100.0 100.0 . 1173 43.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1552 Missing cases 1173 *1996B* INTGE6B Q1, the general election for President Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY INTERESTED 1 752 27.6 70.7 70.7 2 162 5.9 15.2 85.9 3 74 2.7 7.0 92.9 4 42 1.5 3.9 96.8 5 17 .6 1.6 98.4 6 12 .4 1.1 99.5 NOT INTERESTED 7 5 .2 .5 100.0 . 1661 61.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1064 Missing cases 1661 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INTHRD6B Q1, US House race in your district Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY INTERESTED 1 615 22.6 59.4 59.4 2 186 6.8 18.0 77.3 3 99 3.6 9.6 86.9 4 55 2.0 5.3 92.2 5 32 1.2 3.1 95.3 6 27 1.0 2.6 97.9 NOT INTERESTED 7 22 .8 2.1 100.0 . 1689 62.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1036 Missing cases 1689 INTHRN6B Q1, US House races nationally Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY INTERESTED 1 484 17.8 47.3 47.3 2 210 7.7 20.5 67.8 3 155 5.7 15.1 82.9 4 86 3.2 8.4 91.3 5 42 1.5 4.1 95.4 6 31 1.1 3.0 98.4 NOT INTERESTED 7 16 .6 1.6 100.0 . 1701 62.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1024 Missing cases 1701 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INTSLR6B Q1, other state and local races Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY INTERESTED 1 406 14.9 40.4 40.4 2 222 8.1 22.1 62.5 3 164 6.0 16.3 78.8 4 99 3.6 9.9 88.7 5 44 1.6 4.4 93.0 6 39 1.4 3.9 96.9 NOT INTERESTED 7 31 1.1 3.1 100.0 . 1720 63.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1005 Missing cases 1720 HVOT966B Q2, How vote in the 1996 presidential ra Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BILL CLINTON 1 560 20.6 52.8 52.8 ROBERT DOLE 2 471 17.3 44.4 97.2 H. ROSS PEROT 3 29 1.1 2.7 99.9 DID NOT VOTE 5 1 .0 .1 100.0 . 1653 60.7 Missing OTHER WRITE-IN 4 11 .4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1061 Missing cases 1664 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HVHR966B Q3, How vote in the 1996 House race Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE 1 550 20.2 51.9 51.9 REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE 2 487 17.9 46.0 97.9 REFORM PARTY CANDIDA 3 4 .1 .4 98.3 DID NOT VOTE 5 18 .7 1.7 100.0 . 1660 60.9 Missing OTHER 4 6 .2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1059 Missing cases 1666 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PREFDP6B Q4, Democratic Party Preference Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BILL CLINTON 1 627 23.0 100.0 100.0 . 2003 73.5 Missing OTHER WRITE-IN 2 95 3.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 627 Missing cases 2098 PREFRE6B Q4, Reform Party Preference Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent RICHARD LAMM 1 198 7.3 47.9 47.9 H. ROSS PEROT 2 215 7.9 52.1 100.0 . 2273 83.4 Missing OTHER WRITE-IN 3 39 1.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 413 Missing cases 2312 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PREFRP6B Q4, Republican Party Preference Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent LAMAR ALEXANDER 1 197 7.2 26.0 26.0 PATRICK BUCHANAN 2 62 2.3 8.2 34.2 ROBERT DOLE 3 361 13.2 47.6 81.8 STEVE FORBES 4 98 3.6 12.9 94.7 ALAN KEYES 5 40 1.5 5.3 100.0 . 1891 69.4 Missing OTHER WRITE-IN 6 76 2.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 758 Missing cases 1967 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVBC6B Q5, Bill Clinton, convince friends Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 722 26.5 67.0 67.0 CHECKED 1 356 13.1 33.0 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 CLRKBC6B Q5, Bill Clinton, clerical work Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1055 38.7 97.9 97.9 CHECKED 1 23 .8 2.1 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVBC6B Q5, Bill Clinton, canvassing Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1011 37.1 93.8 93.8 CHECKED 1 67 2.5 6.2 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LESSBC6B Q5, Bill Clinton, $100 or less Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 934 34.3 86.6 86.6 CHECKED 1 144 5.3 13.4 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 MOREBC6B Q5, Bill Clinton, more than $100 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1030 37.8 95.5 95.5 CHECKED 1 48 1.8 4.5 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LETRBC6B Q5, Bill Clinton, wrote letter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1061 38.9 98.4 98.4 CHECKED 1 17 .6 1.6 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OTHRBC6B Q5, Bill Clinton, other activity Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 992 36.4 92.0 92.0 CHECKED 1 86 3.2 8.0 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 CONVLA6B Q5, Lamar Alexander, convince friends Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1037 38.1 96.2 96.2 CHECKED 1 41 1.5 3.8 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLRKLA6B Q5, Lamar Alexander, clerical work Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1077 39.5 99.9 99.9 CHECKED 1 1 .0 .1 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVLA6B Q5, Lamar Alexander, canvassing Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1072 39.3 99.4 99.4 CHECKED 1 6 .2 .6 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 LESSLA6B Q5, Lamar Alexander, $100 or less Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1068 39.2 99.1 99.1 CHECKED 1 10 .4 .9 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MORELA6B Q5, Lamar Alexander, more than $100 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1074 39.4 99.6 99.6 CHECKED 1 4 .1 .4 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LETRLA6B Q5, Lamar Alexander, wrote letter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1076 39.5 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 2 .1 .2 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 OTHRLA6B Q5, Lamar Alexander, other activity Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1067 39.2 99.0 99.0 CHECKED 1 11 .4 1.0 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVPB6B Q5, Patrick Buchanan, convince friends Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1048 38.5 97.2 97.2 CHECKED 1 30 1.1 2.8 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLRKPB6B Q5, Patrick Buchanan, clerical work Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1077 39.5 99.9 99.9 CHECKED 1 1 .0 .1 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 CANVPB6B Q5, Patrick Buchanan, canvassing Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1068 39.2 99.1 99.1 CHECKED 1 10 .4 .9 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LESSPB6B Q5, Patrick Buchanan, $100 or less Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1067 39.2 99.0 99.0 CHECKED 1 11 .4 1.0 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MOREPB6B Q5, Patrick Buchanan, more than $100 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1071 39.3 99.4 99.4 CHECKED 1 7 .3 .6 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 LETRPB6B Q5, Patrick Buchanan, wrote letter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1076 39.5 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 2 .1 .2 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OTHRPB6B Q5, Patrick Buchanan, other activity Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1071 39.3 99.4 99.4 CHECKED 1 7 .3 .6 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVRD6B Q5, Robert Dole, convince friends Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 860 31.6 79.8 79.8 CHECKED 1 218 8.0 20.2 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 CLRKRD6B Q5, Robert Dole, clerical work Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1048 38.5 97.2 97.2 CHECKED 1 30 1.1 2.8 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVRD6B Q5, Robert Dole, canvassing Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1015 37.2 94.2 94.2 CHECKED 1 63 2.3 5.8 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LESSRD6B Q5, Robert Dole, $100 or less Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 957 35.1 88.8 88.8 CHECKED 1 121 4.4 11.2 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 MORERD6B Q5, Robert Dole, more than $100 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1026 37.7 95.2 95.2 CHECKED 1 52 1.9 4.8 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LETRRD6B Q5, Robert Dole, wrote letter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1063 39.0 98.6 98.6 CHECKED 1 15 .6 1.4 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OTHRRD6B Q5, Robert Dole, other activity Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1004 36.8 93.1 93.1 CHECKED 1 74 2.7 6.9 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 CONVSF6B Q5, Steve Forbes, convince friends Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1047 38.4 97.1 97.1 CHECKED 1 31 1.1 2.9 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLRKSF6B Q5, Steve Forbes, clerical work Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1077 39.5 99.9 99.9 CHECKED 1 1 .0 .1 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVSF6B Q5, Steve Forbes, canvassing Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1077 39.5 99.9 99.9 CHECKED 1 1 .0 .1 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 LESSSF6B Q5, Steve Forbes, $100 or less Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1071 39.3 99.4 99.4 CHECKED 1 7 .3 .6 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MORESF6B Q5, Steve Forbes, more than $100 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1076 39.5 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 2 .1 .2 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LETRSF6B Q5, Steve Forbes, wrote letter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1076 39.5 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 2 .1 .2 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 OTHRSF6B Q5, Steve Forbes, other activity Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1074 39.4 99.6 99.6 CHECKED 1 4 .1 .4 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVAK6B Q5, Alan Keyes, convince friends Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1062 39.0 98.5 98.5 CHECKED 1 16 .6 1.5 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLRKAK6B Q5, Alan Keyes, clerical work Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1078 39.6 100.0 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 CANVAK6B Q5, Alan Keyes, canvassing Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1074 39.4 99.6 99.6 CHECKED 1 4 .1 .4 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LESSAK6B Q5, Alan Keyes, $100 or less Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1073 39.4 99.5 99.5 CHECKED 1 5 .2 .5 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MOREAK6B Q5, Alan Keyes, more than $100 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1076 39.5 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 2 .1 .2 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 LETRAK6B Q5, Alan Keyes, wrote letter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1078 39.6 100.0 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OTHRAK6B Q5, Alan Keyes, other activity Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1076 39.5 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 2 .1 .2 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVWT6B Q5, write-in, convince friends Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1053 38.6 100.0 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing CHECKED 1 25 .9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1053 Missing cases 1672 CLRKWT6B Q5, write-in, clerical work Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1072 39.3 100.0 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing CHECKED 1 6 .2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1072 Missing cases 1653 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVWT6B Q5, write-in, canvassing Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1073 39.4 100.0 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing CHECKED 1 5 .2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1073 Missing cases 1652 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LESSWT6B Q5, write-in, $100 or less Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1068 39.2 100.0 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing CHECKED 1 10 .4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1068 Missing cases 1657 MOREWT6B Q5, write-in, more than $100 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1075 39.4 100.0 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing CHECKED 1 3 .1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1075 Missing cases 1650 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LETRWT6B Q5, write-in, wrote letter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1075 39.4 100.0 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing CHECKED 1 3 .1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1075 Missing cases 1650 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OTHRWT6B Q5, write-in, other activity Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1060 38.9 100.0 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing CHECKED 1 18 .7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1060 Missing cases 1665 PTYHRS6B Q6, hours per week to party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT INVOLVED 1 581 21.3 54.9 54.9 TWO HOURS OR LESS 2 287 10.5 27.1 82.0 THREE TO FIVE HOURS 3 97 3.6 9.2 91.2 SIX TO TEN HOURS 4 40 1.5 3.8 95.0 MORE THAN TEN HOURS 5 53 1.9 5.0 100.0 . 1667 61.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1058 Missing cases 1667 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - REFSIG6B Q7, signed a ballot petition Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1040 38.2 96.5 96.5 CHECKED 1 38 1.4 3.5 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - REFCOL6B Q7, collected signatures Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1066 39.1 98.9 98.9 CHECKED 1 12 .4 1.1 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 REFVOT6B Q7, received ballot and voted Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1019 37.4 94.5 94.5 CHECKED 1 59 2.2 5.5 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - REFNVT6B Q7, received ballot no vote Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1053 38.6 97.7 97.7 CHECKED 1 25 .9 2.3 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVCG6B Q8, Clinton-Gore, convince friends Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 718 26.3 66.6 66.6 CHECKED 1 360 13.2 33.4 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 CLRKCG6B Q8, Clinton-Gore, clerical work Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1050 38.5 97.4 97.4 CHECKED 1 28 1.0 2.6 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVCG6B Q8, Clinton-Gore, canvassing Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1018 37.4 94.4 94.4 CHECKED 1 60 2.2 5.6 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LESSCG6B Q8, Clinton-Gore, $100 or less Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 964 35.4 89.4 89.4 CHECKED 1 114 4.2 10.6 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 MORECG6B Q8, Clinton-Gore, more than $100 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1040 38.2 96.5 96.5 CHECKED 1 38 1.4 3.5 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LETRCG6B Q8, Clinton-Gore, wrote letter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1067 39.2 99.0 99.0 CHECKED 1 11 .4 1.0 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OTHRCG6B Q8, Clinton-Gore, other activity Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 986 36.2 91.5 91.5 CHECKED 1 92 3.4 8.5 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 CONVDK6B Q8, Dole-Kemp, convince friends Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 817 30.0 75.8 75.8 CHECKED 1 261 9.6 24.2 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLRKDK6B Q8, Dole-Kemp, clerical work Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1050 38.5 97.4 97.4 CHECKED 1 28 1.0 2.6 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVDK6B Q8, Dole-Kemp, canvassing Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1019 37.4 94.5 94.5 CHECKED 1 59 2.2 5.5 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 LESSDK6B Q8, Dole-Kemp, $100 or less Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 955 35.0 88.6 88.6 CHECKED 1 123 4.5 11.4 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MOREDK6B Q8, Dole-Kemp, more than $100 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1019 37.4 94.5 94.5 CHECKED 1 59 2.2 5.5 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LETRDK6B Q8, Dole-Kemp, wrote letter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1055 38.7 97.9 97.9 CHECKED 1 23 .8 2.1 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 OTHRDK6B Q8, Dole-Kemp, other activity Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 990 36.3 91.8 91.8 CHECKED 1 88 3.2 8.2 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVPC6B Q8, Perot-Choate, convince friends Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1071 39.3 99.4 99.4 CHECKED 1 7 .3 .6 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLRKPC6B Q8, Perot-Choate, clerical work Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1077 39.5 99.9 99.9 CHECKED 1 1 .0 .1 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 CANVPC6B Q8, Perot-Choate, canvassing Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1077 39.5 99.9 99.9 CHECKED 1 1 .0 .1 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LESSPC6B Q8, Perot-Choate, $100 or less Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1076 39.5 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 2 .1 .2 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MOREPC6B Q8, Perot-Choate, more than $100 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1078 39.6 100.0 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 LETRPC6B Q8, Perot-Choate, wrote letter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1078 39.6 100.0 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OTHRPC6B Q8, Perot-Choate, other activity Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1076 39.5 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 2 .1 .2 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVDH6B Q8, Dem House cand, convince friends Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 914 33.5 84.8 84.8 CHECKED 1 164 6.0 15.2 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 CLRKDH6B Q8, Dem House cand, clerical work Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1067 39.2 99.0 99.0 CHECKED 1 11 .4 1.0 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVDH6B Q8, Dem House cand, canvassing Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1037 38.1 96.2 96.2 CHECKED 1 41 1.5 3.8 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LESSDH6B Q8, Dem House cand, $100 or less Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1030 37.8 95.5 95.5 CHECKED 1 48 1.8 4.5 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 MOREDH6B Q8, Dem House cand, more than $100 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1056 38.8 98.0 98.0 CHECKED 1 22 .8 2.0 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LETRDH6B Q8, Dem House cand, wrote letter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1075 39.4 99.7 99.7 CHECKED 1 3 .1 .3 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OTHRDH6B Q8, Dem House cand, other activity Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1035 38.0 96.0 96.0 CHECKED 1 43 1.6 4.0 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 CONVRH6B Q8, Rep House cand, convince friends Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 917 33.7 85.1 85.1 CHECKED 1 161 5.9 14.9 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLRKRH6B Q8, Rep House cand, clerical work Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1063 39.0 98.6 98.6 CHECKED 1 15 .6 1.4 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVRH6B Q8, Rep House cand, canvassing Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1048 38.5 97.2 97.2 CHECKED 1 30 1.1 2.8 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 LESSRH6B Q8, Rep House cand, $100 or less Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 995 36.5 92.3 92.3 CHECKED 1 83 3.0 7.7 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MORERH6B Q8, Rep House cand, more than $100 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1039 38.1 96.4 96.4 CHECKED 1 39 1.4 3.6 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LETRRH6B Q8, Rep House cand, wrote letter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1063 39.0 98.6 98.6 CHECKED 1 15 .6 1.4 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 OTHRRH6B Q8, Rep House cand, other activity Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1026 37.7 95.2 95.2 CHECKED 1 52 1.9 4.8 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVDT6B Q8, Dem ticket, convince friends Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 911 33.4 84.5 84.5 CHECKED 1 167 6.1 15.5 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLRKDT6B Q8, Dem ticket, clerical work Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1063 39.0 98.6 98.6 CHECKED 1 15 .6 1.4 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 CANVDT6B Q8, Dem ticket, canvassing Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1039 38.1 96.4 96.4 CHECKED 1 39 1.4 3.6 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LESSDT6B Q8, Dem ticket, $100 or less Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1023 37.5 94.9 94.9 CHECKED 1 55 2.0 5.1 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MOREDT6B Q8, Dem ticket, more than $100 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1052 38.6 97.6 97.6 CHECKED 1 26 1.0 2.4 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 LETRDT6B Q8, Dem ticket, wrote letter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1075 39.4 99.7 99.7 CHECKED 1 3 .1 .3 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OTHRDT6B Q8, Dem ticket, other activity Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1036 38.0 96.1 96.1 CHECKED 1 42 1.5 3.9 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVRT6B Q8, Rep ticket, convince friends Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 902 33.1 83.7 83.7 CHECKED 1 176 6.5 16.3 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 CLRKRT6B Q8, Rep ticket, clerical work Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1055 38.7 97.9 97.9 CHECKED 1 23 .8 2.1 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVRT6B Q8, Rep ticket, canvassing Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1035 38.0 96.0 96.0 CHECKED 1 43 1.6 4.0 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LESSRT6B Q8, Rep ticket, $100 or less Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 998 36.6 92.6 92.6 CHECKED 1 80 2.9 7.4 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 MORERT6B Q8, Rep ticket, more than $100 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1026 37.7 95.2 95.2 CHECKED 1 52 1.9 4.8 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LETRRT6B Q8, Rep ticket, wrote letter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1067 39.2 99.0 99.0 CHECKED 1 11 .4 1.0 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OTHRRT6B Q8, Rep ticket, other activity Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1021 37.5 94.7 94.7 CHECKED 1 57 2.1 5.3 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 CONVRE6B Q8, Reform ticket, convince friends Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1075 39.4 99.7 99.7 CHECKED 1 3 .1 .3 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLRKRE6B Q8, Reform ticket, clerical work Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1078 39.6 100.0 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVRE6B Q8, Reform ticket, canvassing Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1078 39.6 100.0 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 LESSRE6B Q8, Reform ticket, $100 or less Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1077 39.5 99.9 99.9 CHECKED 1 1 .0 .1 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MORERE6B Q8, Reform ticket, more than $100 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1078 39.6 100.0 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LETRRE6B Q8, Reform ticket, wrote letter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1075 39.4 99.7 99.7 CHECKED 1 3 .1 .3 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 OTHRRE6B Q8, Reform ticket, other activity Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1075 39.4 99.7 99.7 CHECKED 1 3 .1 .3 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SLDP6B Q9, State or local Democratic Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Less than $50 1 190 7.0 7.0 7.0 $50-$100 2 74 2.7 2.7 9.7 $100-$250 3 43 1.6 1.6 11.3 $250 and above 4 11 .4 .4 11.7 Did NOT contribute 5 2407 88.3 88.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SLRP6B Q9, State or local Republican Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Less than $50 1 123 4.5 4.5 4.5 $50-$100 2 96 3.5 3.5 8.0 $100-$250 3 56 2.1 2.1 10.1 $250 and above 4 18 .7 .7 10.8 Did NOT contribute 5 2432 89.2 89.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 NDP6B Q9, National Democratic Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Less than $50 1 92 3.4 3.4 3.4 $50-$100 2 40 1.5 1.5 4.8 $100-$250 3 32 1.2 1.2 6.0 $250 and above 4 6 .2 .2 6.2 Did NOT contribute 5 2555 93.8 93.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NRP6B Q9, National Republican Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Less than $50 1 71 2.6 2.6 2.6 $50-$100 2 70 2.6 2.6 5.2 $100-$250 3 32 1.2 1.2 6.3 $250 and above 4 13 .5 .5 6.8 Did NOT contribute 5 2539 93.2 93.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - REFP6B Q9, Reform Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Less than $50 1 3 .1 .1 .1 Did NOT contribute 5 2722 99.9 99.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 INVOLV6B Q10, involved in 1996 Pres campaign? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 431 15.8 43.3 43.3 NO 2 565 20.7 56.7 100.0 . 1729 63.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 996 Missing cases 1729 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMPPOL6B Q10a, to help own political career Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY IMPORTANT 1 13 .5 4.8 4.8 2 4 .1 1.5 6.2 3 13 .5 4.8 11.0 4 8 .3 2.9 13.9 5 6 .2 2.2 16.1 6 14 .5 5.1 21.2 NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 7 215 7.9 78.8 100.0 . 2276 83.5 Missing DID NOT ANSWER 9 176 6.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 273 Missing cases 2452 IMPCOB6B Q10a, to fulfill sense of obligation Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY IMPORTANT 1 181 6.6 45.1 45.1 2 92 3.4 22.9 68.1 3 60 2.2 15.0 83.0 4 32 1.2 8.0 91.0 5 15 .6 3.7 94.8 6 6 .2 1.5 96.3 NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 7 15 .6 3.7 100.0 . 2258 82.9 Missing DID NOT ANSWER 9 66 2.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 401 Missing cases 2324 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMPISS6B Q10a, because of the issues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY IMPORTANT 1 296 10.9 68.8 68.8 2 70 2.6 16.3 85.1 3 40 1.5 9.3 94.4 4 12 .4 2.8 97.2 5 4 .1 .9 98.1 6 2 .1 .5 98.6 NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 7 6 .2 1.4 100.0 . 2247 82.5 Missing DID NOT ANSWER 9 48 1.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 430 Missing cases 2295 IMPFR6B Q10a, because of social contacts Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY IMPORTANT 1 37 1.4 11.7 11.7 2 38 1.4 12.0 23.7 3 49 1.8 15.5 39.2 4 41 1.5 13.0 52.2 5 26 1.0 8.2 60.4 6 32 1.2 10.1 70.6 NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 7 93 3.4 29.4 100.0 . 2273 83.4 Missing DID NOT ANSWER 9 136 5.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 316 Missing cases 2409 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMPPID6B Q10a, because of commitment to party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY IMPORTANT 1 152 5.6 39.7 39.7 2 85 3.1 22.2 61.9 3 48 1.8 12.5 74.4 4 37 1.4 9.7 84.1 5 16 .6 4.2 88.3 6 17 .6 4.4 92.7 NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 7 28 1.0 7.3 100.0 . 2261 83.0 Missing DID NOT ANSWER 9 81 3.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 383 Missing cases 2342 IMPORG6B Q10a, because of group membership Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY IMPORTANT 1 42 1.5 13.8 13.8 2 39 1.4 12.8 26.6 3 33 1.2 10.9 37.5 4 27 1.0 8.9 46.4 5 18 .7 5.9 52.3 6 25 .9 8.2 60.5 NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 7 120 4.4 39.5 100.0 . 2275 83.5 Missing DID NOT ANSWER 9 146 5.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 304 Missing cases 2421 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMPJOB6B Q10a, to help in own profession/job Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY IMPORTANT 1 13 .5 4.4 4.4 2 7 .3 2.4 6.7 3 10 .4 3.4 10.1 4 13 .5 4.4 14.5 5 14 .5 4.7 19.2 6 26 1.0 8.8 27.9 NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 7 214 7.9 72.1 100.0 . 2263 83.0 Missing DID NOT ANSWER 9 165 6.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 297 Missing cases 2428 CONTDH6B Q11, Democratic House campaign in distri Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 371 13.6 13.6 13.6 NO 2 2354 86.4 86.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTRH6B Q11, Republican House campaign in distri Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 416 15.3 15.3 15.3 NO 2 2309 84.7 84.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONREH6B Q11, Reform Party House campaign in dist Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 20 .7 .7 .7 NO 2 2705 99.3 99.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 CONTDP6B Q11, Democratic Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 456 16.7 16.7 16.7 NO 2 2269 83.3 83.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTRE6B Q11, Reform Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 36 1.3 1.3 1.3 NO 2 2689 98.7 98.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTRP6B Q11, Republican Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 497 18.2 18.2 18.2 NO 2 2228 81.8 81.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 PTYID6B Q12, describe your party affiliation Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONG DEMOCRAT 1 327 12.0 30.9 30.9 WEAK DEMOCRAT 2 134 4.9 12.7 43.6 INDEPENDENT DEM 3 87 3.2 8.2 51.8 INDEPENDENT 4 29 1.1 2.7 54.5 INDEPENDENT REP 5 52 1.9 4.9 59.5 WEAK REPUBLICAN 6 109 4.0 10.3 69.8 STRONG REPUBLICAN 7 320 11.7 30.2 100.0 . 1663 61.0 Missing OTHR PTY WRITE-IN 8 4 .1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1058 Missing cases 1667 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LIBCON6B Q13, describe your political philosophy Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 33 1.2 3.2 3.2 LIBERAL 2 182 6.7 17.5 20.7 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 147 5.4 14.1 34.8 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 174 6.4 16.7 51.5 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 147 5.4 14.1 65.6 CONSERVATIVE 6 314 11.5 30.2 95.8 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 44 1.6 4.2 100.0 . 1660 60.9 Missing OTHER WRITE-IN 8 11 .4 Missing NOT SURE 9 13 .5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1041 Missing cases 1684 BETWN6B Q14, work between now and 2000: Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent IN DEM PARTY 1 206 7.6 26.3 26.3 IN REP PARTY 2 243 8.9 31.1 57.4 IN REFORM PARTY 3 4 .1 .5 57.9 IN OTHR 3RD PTY 4 9 .3 1.2 59.1 INVOLVED NO WORK 5 171 6.3 21.9 80.9 NO INVOLVEMENT 6 149 5.5 19.1 100.0 . 1670 61.3 Missing NOT SURE 7 273 10.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 782 Missing cases 1943 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABORT6B Q15, amendment to prohibit abortions Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 161 5.9 16.4 16.4 FAVOR 2 112 4.1 11.4 27.7 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 60 2.2 6.1 33.8 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 55 2.0 5.6 39.4 OPPOSE 5 155 5.7 15.8 55.2 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 441 16.2 44.8 100.0 . 1681 61.7 Missing NOT SURE 7 60 2.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 984 Missing cases 1741 INVOL6B Q15, decreased US involvement Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 104 3.8 10.6 10.6 FAVOR 2 212 7.8 21.6 32.2 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 225 8.3 22.9 55.1 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 136 5.0 13.8 68.9 OPPOSE 5 167 6.1 17.0 85.9 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 138 5.1 14.1 100.0 . 1684 61.8 Missing NOT SURE 7 59 2.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 982 Missing cases 1743 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEFTX6B Q15, reduce deficit, higher taxes Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 128 4.7 12.8 12.8 FAVOR 2 267 9.8 26.6 39.4 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 235 8.6 23.4 62.8 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 115 4.2 11.5 74.3 OPPOSE 5 148 5.4 14.8 89.0 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 110 4.0 11.0 100.0 . 1683 61.8 Missing NOT SURE 7 39 1.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1003 Missing cases 1722 IMPORT6B Q15, limits on foreign imports Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 135 5.0 14.2 14.2 FAVOR 2 208 7.6 21.8 36.0 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 218 8.0 22.9 58.8 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 128 4.7 13.4 72.2 OPPOSE 5 178 6.5 18.7 90.9 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 87 3.2 9.1 100.0 . 1690 62.0 Missing NOT SURE 7 81 3.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 954 Missing cases 1771 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AFFACT6B Q15, affirmative action programs Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 86 3.2 8.8 8.8 FAVOR 2 182 6.7 18.6 27.3 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 176 6.5 17.9 45.3 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 124 4.6 12.6 57.9 OPPOSE 5 194 7.1 19.8 77.7 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 219 8.0 22.3 100.0 . 1684 61.8 Missing NOT SURE 7 60 2.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 981 Missing cases 1744 TERM6B Q15, term limits for Congress Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 215 7.9 21.8 21.8 FAVOR 2 232 8.5 23.5 45.2 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 153 5.6 15.5 60.7 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 64 2.3 6.5 67.2 OPPOSE 5 161 5.9 16.3 83.5 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 163 6.0 16.5 100.0 . 1680 61.7 Missing NOT SURE 7 57 2.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 988 Missing cases 1737 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NHI6B Q15, national health insurance plan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 164 6.0 16.9 16.9 FAVOR 2 197 7.2 20.3 37.3 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 141 5.2 14.6 51.8 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 67 2.5 6.9 58.7 OPPOSE 5 115 4.2 11.9 70.6 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 285 10.5 29.4 100.0 . 1677 61.5 Missing NOT SURE 7 79 2.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 969 Missing cases 1756 DEFGP6B Q15, reduce deficit, program cuts Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 232 8.5 23.0 23.0 FAVOR 2 274 10.1 27.1 50.1 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 212 7.8 21.0 71.1 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 115 4.2 11.4 82.5 OPPOSE 5 113 4.1 11.2 93.7 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 64 2.3 6.3 100.0 . 1671 61.3 Missing NOT SURE 7 44 1.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1010 Missing cases 1715 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SHFTST6B Q15, domestic programs to states Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 234 8.6 23.8 23.8 FAVOR 2 267 9.8 27.1 50.9 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 150 5.5 15.2 66.2 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 109 4.0 11.1 77.2 OPPOSE 5 135 5.0 13.7 91.0 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 89 3.3 9.0 100.0 . 1673 61.4 Missing NOT SURE 7 68 2.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 984 Missing cases 1741 ARM6B Q15, increased firearms regulation Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 337 12.4 33.0 33.0 FAVOR 2 224 8.2 22.0 55.0 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 113 4.1 11.1 66.1 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 56 2.1 5.5 71.6 OPPOSE 5 116 4.3 11.4 82.9 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 174 6.4 17.1 100.0 . 1670 61.3 Missing NOT SURE 7 35 1.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1020 Missing cases 1705 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SLIMIG6B Q15, stricter limits on immigrants Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 256 9.4 26.3 26.3 FAVOR 2 240 8.8 24.6 50.9 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 203 7.4 20.8 71.8 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 114 4.2 11.7 83.5 OPPOSE 5 109 4.0 11.2 94.7 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 52 1.9 5.3 100.0 . 1673 61.4 Missing NOT SURE 7 78 2.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 974 Missing cases 1751 MIISS6B Q15a, most important issue in Q15: Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ABORTION 1 151 5.5 14.7 14.7 US INVOLVEMENT 2 38 1.4 3.7 18.5 FEDERAL DEFICIT, TAX 3 128 4.7 12.5 31.0 IMPORTS 4 31 1.1 3.0 34.0 AFFIRMATIVE ACTION 5 58 2.1 5.7 39.6 TERM LIMITS 6 41 1.5 4.0 43.7 NATIONAL HEALTH INSU 7 160 5.9 15.6 59.3 FEDERAL DEFICIT, PRO 8 216 7.9 21.1 80.4 SHIFT DOMESTIC PROG 9 80 2.9 7.8 88.2 FIREARMS 10 66 2.4 6.4 94.6 STRICTER LIMITS ON I 11 55 2.0 5.4 100.0 . 1670 61.3 Missing NOT SURE 12 31 1.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1024 Missing cases 1701 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PRIORP6B Q15b, Republican Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent TOP PRIORITY 1 280 10.3 29.2 29.2 PRIORITY, BUT NOT TO 2 352 12.9 36.7 65.9 NOT A PRIORITY ITEM 3 327 12.0 34.1 100.0 . 1698 62.3 Missing NOT SURE 4 68 2.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 959 Missing cases 1766 PRIODP6B Q15b, Democratic Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent TOP PRIORITY 1 142 5.2 14.7 14.7 PRIORITY, BUT NOT TO 2 406 14.9 42.0 56.7 NOT A PRIORITY ITEM 3 419 15.4 43.3 100.0 . 1700 62.4 Missing NOT SURE 4 58 2.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 967 Missing cases 1758 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PRIORE6B Q15b, Reform Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent TOP PRIORITY 1 219 8.0 42.1 42.1 PRIORITY, BUT NOT TO 2 142 5.2 27.3 69.4 NOT A PRIORITY ITEM 3 159 5.8 30.6 100.0 . 1748 64.1 Missing NOT SURE 4 457 16.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 520 Missing cases 2205 MIISBC6B Q16, Bill Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 201 7.4 21.6 21.6 FAVOR 2 204 7.5 22.0 43.6 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 140 5.1 15.1 58.7 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 46 1.7 5.0 63.6 OPPOSE 5 135 5.0 14.5 78.1 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 203 7.4 21.9 100.0 . 1709 62.7 Missing NOT SURE 7 87 3.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 929 Missing cases 1796 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MIISRD6B Q16, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 175 6.4 19.3 19.3 FAVOR 2 253 9.3 27.9 47.2 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 154 5.7 17.0 64.2 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 55 2.0 6.1 70.3 OPPOSE 5 129 4.7 14.2 84.5 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 140 5.1 15.5 100.0 . 1737 63.7 Missing NOT SURE 7 82 3.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 906 Missing cases 1819 MIIHRP6B Q16, H Ross Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 195 7.2 33.7 33.7 FAVOR 2 156 5.7 26.9 60.6 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 62 2.3 10.7 71.3 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 22 .8 3.8 75.1 OPPOSE 5 77 2.8 13.3 88.4 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 67 2.5 11.6 100.0 . 1794 65.8 Missing NOT SURE 7 352 12.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 579 Missing cases 2146 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MIISDH6B Q16, Democratic House candidate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 102 3.7 13.7 13.7 FAVOR 2 176 6.5 23.7 37.4 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 122 4.5 16.4 53.8 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 60 2.2 8.1 61.8 OPPOSE 5 129 4.7 17.3 79.2 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 155 5.7 20.8 100.0 . 1789 65.7 Missing NOT SURE 7 192 7.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 744 Missing cases 1981 MIISRH6B Q16, Republican House candidate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 183 6.7 23.8 23.8 FAVOR 2 231 8.5 30.0 53.8 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 97 3.6 12.6 66.4 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 33 1.2 4.3 70.6 OPPOSE 5 106 3.9 13.8 84.4 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 120 4.4 15.6 100.0 . 1776 65.2 Missing NOT SURE 7 179 6.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 770 Missing cases 1955 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MIISAA6B Q16, average American voter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 93 3.4 10.8 10.8 FAVOR 2 297 10.9 34.6 45.5 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 245 9.0 28.6 74.0 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 107 3.9 12.5 86.5 OPPOSE 5 93 3.4 10.8 97.3 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 23 .8 2.7 100.0 . 1755 64.4 Missing NOT SURE 7 112 4.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 858 Missing cases 1867 MIISRP6B Q16, Republican Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 160 5.9 18.4 18.4 FAVOR 2 267 9.8 30.7 49.1 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 135 5.0 15.5 64.7 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 43 1.6 4.9 69.6 OPPOSE 5 134 4.9 15.4 85.0 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 130 4.8 15.0 100.0 . 1754 64.4 Missing NOT SURE 7 102 3.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 869 Missing cases 1856 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MIISDP6B Q16, Democratic Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 96 3.5 10.8 10.8 FAVOR 2 214 7.9 24.1 34.9 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 161 5.9 18.1 53.0 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 66 2.4 7.4 60.5 OPPOSE 5 183 6.7 20.6 81.1 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 168 6.2 18.9 100.0 . 1742 63.9 Missing NOT SURE 7 95 3.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 888 Missing cases 1837 MIISRE6B Q16, Reform Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 144 5.3 30.9 30.9 FAVOR 2 152 5.6 32.6 63.5 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 55 2.0 11.8 75.3 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 20 .7 4.3 79.6 OPPOSE 5 55 2.0 11.8 91.4 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 40 1.5 8.6 100.0 . 1775 65.1 Missing NOT SURE 7 484 17.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 466 Missing cases 2259 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CHAR6B Q17, characterize yourself: Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent INVOLVED CONSISTENTL 1 681 25.0 64.9 64.9 INVOLVED WORTHWHILE 2 197 7.2 18.8 83.6 NEWCOMER TO POLITICS 3 7 .3 .7 84.3 NOT INVOLVED 4 165 6.1 15.7 100.0 . 1675 61.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1050 Missing cases 1675 LCBC6B Q18, Bill Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 206 7.6 20.7 20.7 LIBERAL 2 348 12.8 34.9 55.6 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 248 9.1 24.9 80.4 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 149 5.5 14.9 95.4 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 30 1.1 3.0 98.4 CONSERVATIVE 6 13 .5 1.3 99.7 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 3 .1 .3 100.0 . 1691 62.1 Missing NOT SURE 8 37 1.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 997 Missing cases 1728 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCRD6B Q18, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 2 .1 .2 .2 LIBERAL 2 12 .4 1.2 1.4 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 15 .6 1.5 2.9 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 88 3.2 8.8 11.7 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 215 7.9 21.5 33.2 CONSERVATIVE 6 537 19.7 53.8 87.0 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 130 4.8 13.0 100.0 . 1700 62.4 Missing NOT SURE 8 26 1.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 999 Missing cases 1726 LCRG6B Q18, Richard Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 244 9.0 28.7 28.7 LIBERAL 2 287 10.5 33.8 62.5 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 172 6.3 20.2 82.7 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 81 3.0 9.5 92.2 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 29 1.1 3.4 95.6 CONSERVATIVE 6 23 .8 2.7 98.4 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 14 .5 1.6 100.0 . 1733 63.6 Missing NOT SURE 8 142 5.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 850 Missing cases 1875 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCNG6B Q18, Newt Gingrich Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 11 .4 1.1 1.1 LIBERAL 2 12 .4 1.2 2.4 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 8 .3 .8 3.2 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 19 .7 2.0 5.2 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 51 1.9 5.3 10.5 CONSERVATIVE 6 364 13.4 37.8 48.3 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 497 18.2 51.7 100.0 . 1722 63.2 Missing NOT SURE 8 41 1.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 962 Missing cases 1763 LCAG6B Q18, Al Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 256 9.4 26.1 26.1 LIBERAL 2 337 12.4 34.4 60.6 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 230 8.4 23.5 84.1 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 113 4.1 11.5 95.6 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 24 .9 2.5 98.1 CONSERVATIVE 6 16 .6 1.6 99.7 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 3 .1 .3 100.0 . 1717 63.0 Missing NOT SURE 8 29 1.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 979 Missing cases 1746 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCJK6B Q18, Jack Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 6 .2 .7 .7 LIBERAL 2 12 .4 1.3 2.0 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 35 1.3 3.8 5.8 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 113 4.1 12.4 18.2 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 188 6.9 20.6 38.9 CONSERVATIVE 6 435 16.0 47.7 86.6 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 122 4.5 13.4 100.0 . 1733 63.6 Missing NOT SURE 8 81 3.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 911 Missing cases 1814 LCDL6B Q18, Dick Lamm Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 9 .3 2.4 2.4 LIBERAL 2 29 1.1 7.7 10.1 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 37 1.4 9.8 19.9 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 82 3.0 21.8 41.6 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 76 2.8 20.2 61.8 CONSERVATIVE 6 101 3.7 26.8 88.6 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 43 1.6 11.4 100.0 . 1791 65.7 Missing NOT SURE 8 557 20.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 377 Missing cases 2348 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCHRP6B Q18, H Ross Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 7 .3 1.0 1.0 LIBERAL 2 15 .6 2.1 3.0 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 26 1.0 3.6 6.6 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 78 2.9 10.8 17.5 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 131 4.8 18.1 35.6 CONSERVATIVE 6 315 11.6 43.6 79.2 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 150 5.5 20.8 100.0 . 1747 64.1 Missing NOT SURE 8 256 9.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 722 Missing cases 2003 LCCP6B Q18, Colin Powell Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 10 .4 1.2 1.2 LIBERAL 2 34 1.2 4.2 5.4 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 85 3.1 10.4 15.8 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 281 10.3 34.5 50.3 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 240 8.8 29.4 79.8 CONSERVATIVE 6 147 5.4 18.0 97.8 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 18 .7 2.2 100.0 . 1740 63.9 Missing NOT SURE 8 170 6.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 815 Missing cases 1910 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCAA6B Q18, average American voter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 7 .3 .7 .7 LIBERAL 2 22 .8 2.3 3.1 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 137 5.0 14.6 17.7 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 405 14.9 43.1 60.8 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 289 10.6 30.8 91.6 CONSERVATIVE 6 74 2.7 7.9 99.5 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 5 .2 .5 100.0 . 1724 63.3 Missing NOT SURE 8 62 2.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 939 Missing cases 1786 LCDH6B Q18, Democratic House candidate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 142 5.2 15.9 15.9 LIBERAL 2 307 11.3 34.4 50.3 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 251 9.2 28.1 78.5 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 116 4.3 13.0 91.5 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 38 1.4 4.3 95.7 CONSERVATIVE 6 31 1.1 3.5 99.2 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 7 .3 .8 100.0 . 1742 63.9 Missing NOT SURE 8 91 3.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 892 Missing cases 1833 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCRH6B Q18, Republican House candidate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 6 .2 .7 .7 LIBERAL 2 5 .2 .6 1.3 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 18 .7 2.0 3.3 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 68 2.5 7.7 11.0 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 143 5.2 16.3 27.3 CONSERVATIVE 6 449 16.5 51.1 78.4 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 190 7.0 21.6 100.0 . 1751 64.3 Missing NOT SURE 8 95 3.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 879 Missing cases 1846 LCDP6B Q18, Democratic Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 188 6.9 19.1 19.1 LIBERAL 2 397 14.6 40.4 59.5 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 275 10.1 28.0 87.5 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 95 3.5 9.7 97.2 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 13 .5 1.3 98.5 CONSERVATIVE 6 14 .5 1.4 99.9 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 1 .0 .1 100.0 . 1709 62.7 Missing NOT SURE 8 33 1.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 983 Missing cases 1742 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCRP6B Q18, Republican Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 1 .0 .1 .1 LIBERAL 2 11 .4 1.1 1.2 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 12 .4 1.2 2.5 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 42 1.5 4.3 6.8 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 142 5.2 14.7 21.5 CONSERVATIVE 6 552 20.3 57.1 78.7 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 206 7.6 21.3 100.0 . 1711 62.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 48 1.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 966 Missing cases 1759 LCRE6B Q18, Reform Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 7 .3 1.4 1.4 LIBERAL 2 7 .3 1.4 2.7 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 20 .7 3.9 6.6 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 76 2.8 14.8 21.5 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 107 3.9 20.9 42.4 CONSERVATIVE 6 201 7.4 39.3 81.6 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 94 3.4 18.4 100.0 . 1736 63.7 Missing NOT SURE 8 477 17.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 512 Missing cases 2213 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AFFBC6B Q19a, Bill Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 266 9.8 27.5 27.5 FAVOR 2 447 16.4 46.3 73.8 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 209 7.7 21.6 95.4 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 28 1.0 2.9 98.3 OPPOSE 5 9 .3 .9 99.3 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 7 .3 .7 100.0 . 1710 62.8 Missing NOT SURE 7 49 1.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 966 Missing cases 1759 AFFRD6B Q19a, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 13 .5 1.4 1.4 FAVOR 2 40 1.5 4.3 5.7 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 82 3.0 8.8 14.5 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 156 5.7 16.7 31.2 OPPOSE 5 431 15.8 46.2 77.5 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 210 7.7 22.5 100.0 . 1718 63.0 Missing NOT SURE 7 75 2.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 932 Missing cases 1793 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AFFHRP6B Q19a, H Ross Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 6 .2 1.1 1.1 FAVOR 2 28 1.0 5.0 6.0 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 39 1.4 6.9 13.0 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 80 2.9 14.2 27.2 OPPOSE 5 270 9.9 48.0 75.3 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 139 5.1 24.7 100.0 . 1755 64.4 Missing NOT SURE 7 408 15.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 562 Missing cases 2163 AFFAA6B Q19a, average American voter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 5 .2 .6 .6 FAVOR 2 57 2.1 6.6 7.2 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 177 6.5 20.5 27.7 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 313 11.5 36.3 64.0 OPPOSE 5 269 9.9 31.2 95.1 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 42 1.5 4.9 100.0 . 1743 64.0 Missing NOT SURE 7 119 4.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 863 Missing cases 1862 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AFFDP6B Q19a, Democratic Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 235 8.6 25.3 25.3 FAVOR 2 402 14.8 43.3 68.6 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 251 9.2 27.0 95.7 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 26 1.0 2.8 98.5 OPPOSE 5 10 .4 1.1 99.6 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 4 .1 .4 100.0 . 1736 63.7 Missing NOT SURE 7 61 2.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 928 Missing cases 1797 AFFRP6B Q19a, Republican Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 4 .1 .4 .4 FAVOR 2 38 1.4 4.1 4.6 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 45 1.7 4.9 9.5 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 145 5.3 15.8 25.2 OPPOSE 5 462 17.0 50.3 75.5 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 225 8.3 24.5 100.0 . 1732 63.6 Missing NOT SURE 7 74 2.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 919 Missing cases 1806 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AFFRE6B Q19a, Reform Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 6 .2 1.6 1.6 FAVOR 2 18 .7 4.7 6.2 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 27 1.0 7.0 13.2 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 66 2.4 17.1 30.2 OPPOSE 5 188 6.9 48.6 78.8 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 82 3.0 21.2 100.0 . 1763 64.7 Missing NOT SURE 7 575 21.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 387 Missing cases 2338 DEFBC6B Q19b, Bill Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 33 1.2 3.4 3.4 FAVOR 2 118 4.3 12.1 15.5 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 202 7.4 20.8 36.3 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 124 4.6 12.8 49.1 OPPOSE 5 278 10.2 28.6 77.7 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 217 8.0 22.3 100.0 . 1714 62.9 Missing NOT SURE 7 39 1.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 972 Missing cases 1753 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEFRD6B Q19b, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 255 9.4 26.6 26.6 FAVOR 2 451 16.6 47.0 73.6 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 161 5.9 16.8 90.4 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 48 1.8 5.0 95.4 OPPOSE 5 29 1.1 3.0 98.4 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 15 .6 1.6 100.0 . 1723 63.2 Missing NOT SURE 7 43 1.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 959 Missing cases 1766 DEFHRP6B Q19b, H Ross Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 315 11.6 43.6 43.6 FAVOR 2 291 10.7 40.3 83.9 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 63 2.3 8.7 92.7 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 21 .8 2.9 95.6 OPPOSE 5 16 .6 2.2 97.8 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 16 .6 2.2 100.0 . 1759 64.6 Missing NOT SURE 7 244 9.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 722 Missing cases 2003 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEFAA6B Q19b, average American voter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 31 1.1 3.5 3.5 FAVOR 2 184 6.8 20.7 24.2 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 355 13.0 40.0 64.2 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 193 7.1 21.7 85.9 OPPOSE 5 110 4.0 12.4 98.3 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 15 .6 1.7 100.0 . 1747 64.1 Missing NOT SURE 7 90 3.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 888 Missing cases 1837 DEFDP6B Q19b, Democratic Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 27 1.0 2.8 2.8 FAVOR 2 93 3.4 9.8 12.7 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 178 6.5 18.8 31.4 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 124 4.6 13.1 44.5 OPPOSE 5 316 11.6 33.3 77.8 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 210 7.7 22.2 100.0 . 1734 63.6 Missing NOT SURE 7 43 1.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 948 Missing cases 1777 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEFRP6B Q19b, Republican Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 247 9.1 26.6 26.6 FAVOR 2 436 16.0 46.9 73.4 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 146 5.4 15.7 89.1 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 44 1.6 4.7 93.9 OPPOSE 5 35 1.3 3.8 97.6 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 22 .8 2.4 100.0 . 1733 63.6 Missing NOT SURE 7 62 2.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 930 Missing cases 1795 DEFRE6B Q19b, Reform Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 196 7.2 37.0 37.0 FAVOR 2 213 7.8 40.2 77.2 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 72 2.6 13.6 90.8 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 25 .9 4.7 95.5 OPPOSE 5 12 .4 2.3 97.7 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 12 .4 2.3 100.0 . 1756 64.4 Missing NOT SURE 7 439 16.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 530 Missing cases 2195 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABOBC6B Q19c, Bill Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 43 1.6 4.6 4.6 FAVOR 2 60 2.2 6.4 11.0 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 31 1.1 3.3 14.3 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 43 1.6 4.6 18.9 OPPOSE 5 284 10.4 30.4 49.3 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 474 17.4 50.7 100.0 . 1718 63.0 Missing NOT SURE 7 72 2.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 935 Missing cases 1790 ABORD6B Q19c, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 186 6.8 21.3 21.3 FAVOR 2 353 13.0 40.4 61.7 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 210 7.7 24.1 85.8 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 52 1.9 6.0 91.8 OPPOSE 5 58 2.1 6.6 98.4 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 14 .5 1.6 100.0 . 1736 63.7 Missing NOT SURE 7 116 4.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 873 Missing cases 1852 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABOHRP6B Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 59 2.2 14.0 14.0 FAVOR 2 92 3.4 21.9 36.0 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 70 2.6 16.7 52.6 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 58 2.1 13.8 66.4 OPPOSE 5 93 3.4 22.1 88.6 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 48 1.8 11.4 100.0 . 1771 65.0 Missing NOT SURE 7 534 19.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 420 Missing cases 2305 ABOAA6B Q19c, average American voter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 18 .7 2.1 2.1 FAVOR 2 69 2.5 8.2 10.3 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 170 6.2 20.2 30.5 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 231 8.5 27.4 58.0 OPPOSE 5 296 10.9 35.2 93.1 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 58 2.1 6.9 100.0 . 1744 64.0 Missing NOT SURE 7 139 5.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 842 Missing cases 1883 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABODP6B Q19c, Democratic Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 23 .8 2.6 2.6 FAVOR 2 65 2.4 7.3 9.9 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 41 1.5 4.6 14.5 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 71 2.6 8.0 22.5 OPPOSE 5 366 13.4 41.1 63.6 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 324 11.9 36.4 100.0 . 1753 64.3 Missing NOT SURE 7 82 3.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 890 Missing cases 1835 ABORP6B Q19c, Republican Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 189 6.9 21.6 21.6 FAVOR 2 371 13.6 42.5 64.1 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 193 7.1 22.1 86.3 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 46 1.7 5.3 91.5 OPPOSE 5 53 1.9 6.1 97.6 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 21 .8 2.4 100.0 . 1751 64.3 Missing NOT SURE 7 101 3.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 873 Missing cases 1852 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABORE6B Q19c, Reform Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 34 1.2 10.8 10.8 FAVOR 2 71 2.6 22.5 33.3 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 59 2.2 18.7 52.1 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 62 2.3 19.7 71.7 OPPOSE 5 65 2.4 20.6 92.4 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 24 .9 7.6 100.0 . 1784 65.5 Missing NOT SURE 7 626 23.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 315 Missing cases 2410 INVBC6B Q19d, Bill Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 34 1.2 3.7 3.7 FAVOR 2 60 2.2 6.6 10.3 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 98 3.6 10.7 21.0 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 108 4.0 11.8 32.8 OPPOSE 5 345 12.7 37.7 70.5 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 270 9.9 29.5 100.0 . 1713 62.9 Missing NOT SURE 7 97 3.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 915 Missing cases 1810 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INVRD6B Q19d, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 55 2.0 6.3 6.3 FAVOR 2 206 7.6 23.4 29.7 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 228 8.4 25.9 55.6 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 135 5.0 15.4 71.0 OPPOSE 5 183 6.7 20.8 91.8 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 72 2.6 8.2 100.0 . 1732 63.6 Missing NOT SURE 7 114 4.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 879 Missing cases 1846 INVHRP6B Q19d, H Ross Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 126 4.6 21.6 21.6 FAVOR 2 240 8.8 41.2 62.9 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 93 3.4 16.0 78.9 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 47 1.7 8.1 86.9 OPPOSE 5 46 1.7 7.9 94.8 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 30 1.1 5.2 100.0 . 1764 64.7 Missing NOT SURE 7 379 13.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 582 Missing cases 2143 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INVAA6B Q19d, average American voter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 48 1.8 5.6 5.6 FAVOR 2 205 7.5 23.8 29.3 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 323 11.9 37.4 66.7 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 189 6.9 21.9 88.6 OPPOSE 5 81 3.0 9.4 98.0 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 17 .6 2.0 100.0 . 1745 64.0 Missing NOT SURE 7 117 4.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 863 Missing cases 1862 INVDP6B Q19d, Democratic Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 25 .9 2.9 2.9 FAVOR 2 78 2.9 9.0 11.9 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 143 5.2 16.5 28.3 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 154 5.7 17.7 46.0 OPPOSE 5 321 11.8 36.9 83.0 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 148 5.4 17.0 100.0 . 1737 63.7 Missing NOT SURE 7 119 4.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 869 Missing cases 1856 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INVRP6B Q19d, Republican Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 63 2.3 7.4 7.4 FAVOR 2 257 9.4 30.3 37.8 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 227 8.3 26.8 64.6 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 102 3.7 12.0 76.6 OPPOSE 5 163 6.0 19.2 95.9 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 35 1.3 4.1 100.0 . 1738 63.8 Missing NOT SURE 7 140 5.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 847 Missing cases 1878 INVRE6B Q19d, Reform Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 76 2.8 19.5 19.5 FAVOR 2 164 6.0 42.2 61.7 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 62 2.3 15.9 77.6 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 40 1.5 10.3 87.9 OPPOSE 5 34 1.2 8.7 96.7 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 13 .5 3.3 100.0 . 1764 64.7 Missing NOT SURE 7 572 21.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 389 Missing cases 2336 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVABC6B Q20, Bill Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 135 5.0 13.7 13.7 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 282 10.3 28.6 42.3 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVERA 3 146 5.4 14.8 57.2 AVERAGE 4 115 4.2 11.7 68.8 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVERA 5 57 2.1 5.8 74.6 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 99 3.6 10.1 84.7 POOR 7 151 5.5 15.3 100.0 . 1725 63.3 Missing NOT SURE 8 15 .6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 985 Missing cases 1740 EVARD6B Q20, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 57 2.1 5.9 5.9 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 243 8.9 25.1 31.0 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVERA 3 233 8.6 24.1 55.1 AVERAGE 4 245 9.0 25.3 80.5 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVERA 5 73 2.7 7.5 88.0 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 47 1.7 4.9 92.9 POOR 7 69 2.5 7.1 100.0 . 1737 63.7 Missing NOT SURE 8 21 .8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 967 Missing cases 1758 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVARG6B Q20, Richard Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 28 1.0 3.4 3.4 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 139 5.1 16.7 20.0 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVERA 3 198 7.3 23.7 43.8 AVERAGE 4 207 7.6 24.8 68.6 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVERA 5 73 2.7 8.8 77.3 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 90 3.3 10.8 88.1 POOR 7 99 3.6 11.9 100.0 . 1764 64.7 Missing NOT SURE 8 127 4.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 834 Missing cases 1891 EVANG6B Q20, Newt Gingrich Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 59 2.2 6.3 6.3 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 161 5.9 17.1 23.3 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVERA 3 136 5.0 14.4 37.7 AVERAGE 4 123 4.5 13.0 50.7 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVERA 5 102 3.7 10.8 61.5 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 133 4.9 14.1 75.6 POOR 7 230 8.4 24.4 100.0 . 1750 64.2 Missing NOT SURE 8 31 1.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 944 Missing cases 1781 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVAAG6B Q20, Al Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 112 4.1 11.8 11.8 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 223 8.2 23.5 35.3 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVERA 3 176 6.5 18.5 53.8 AVERAGE 4 163 6.0 17.2 71.0 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVERA 5 70 2.6 7.4 78.4 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 83 3.0 8.7 87.1 POOR 7 122 4.5 12.9 100.0 . 1743 64.0 Missing NOT SURE 8 33 1.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 949 Missing cases 1776 EVAJK6B Q20, Jack Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 40 1.5 4.5 4.5 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 168 6.2 18.8 23.3 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVERA 3 218 8.0 24.4 47.8 AVERAGE 4 274 10.1 30.7 78.5 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVERA 5 90 3.3 10.1 88.6 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 47 1.7 5.3 93.8 POOR 7 55 2.0 6.2 100.0 . 1769 64.9 Missing NOT SURE 8 64 2.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 892 Missing cases 1833 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVADL6B Q20, Dick Lamm Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 2 .1 .5 .5 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 24 .9 6.0 6.5 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVERA 3 69 2.5 17.2 23.6 AVERAGE 4 125 4.6 31.1 54.7 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVERA 5 76 2.8 18.9 73.6 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 50 1.8 12.4 86.1 POOR 7 56 2.1 13.9 100.0 . 1798 66.0 Missing NOT SURE 8 525 19.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 402 Missing cases 2323 EVAHRP6B Q20, H Ross Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 16 .6 2.0 2.0 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 64 2.3 8.1 10.1 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVERA 3 82 3.0 10.3 20.4 AVERAGE 4 153 5.6 19.2 39.6 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVERA 5 122 4.5 15.3 55.0 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 127 4.7 16.0 70.9 POOR 7 231 8.5 29.1 100.0 . 1776 65.2 Missing NOT SURE 8 154 5.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 795 Missing cases 1930 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVACP6B Q20, Colin Powell Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 99 3.6 12.4 12.4 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 232 8.5 29.0 41.4 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVERA 3 199 7.3 24.9 66.3 AVERAGE 4 164 6.0 20.5 86.8 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVERA 5 54 2.0 6.8 93.5 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 23 .8 2.9 96.4 POOR 7 29 1.1 3.6 100.0 . 1771 65.0 Missing NOT SURE 8 154 5.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 800 Missing cases 1925 EVADP6B Q20, Democratic Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 43 1.6 4.6 4.6 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 153 5.6 16.5 21.1 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVERA 3 168 6.2 18.1 39.1 AVERAGE 4 259 9.5 27.8 67.0 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVERA 5 97 3.6 10.4 77.4 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 94 3.4 10.1 87.5 POOR 7 116 4.3 12.5 100.0 . 1755 64.4 Missing NOT SURE 8 40 1.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 930 Missing cases 1795 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVARP6B Q20, Republican Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 21 .8 2.3 2.3 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 119 4.4 13.2 15.5 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVERA 3 176 6.5 19.5 35.0 AVERAGE 4 257 9.4 28.5 63.5 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVERA 5 130 4.8 14.4 77.9 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 88 3.2 9.8 87.7 POOR 7 111 4.1 12.3 100.0 . 1772 65.0 Missing NOT SURE 8 51 1.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 902 Missing cases 1823 EVARE6B Q20, Reform Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 7 .3 1.4 1.4 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 16 .6 3.1 4.4 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVERA 3 58 2.1 11.2 15.6 AVERAGE 4 108 4.0 20.8 36.5 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVERA 5 96 3.5 18.5 55.0 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 92 3.4 17.8 72.8 POOR 7 141 5.2 27.2 100.0 . 1836 67.4 Missing NOT SURE 8 371 13.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 518 Missing cases 2207 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVADH6B Q20, Democratic House candidate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 64 2.3 7.7 7.7 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 163 6.0 19.5 27.2 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVERA 3 141 5.2 16.9 44.1 AVERAGE 4 182 6.7 21.8 65.9 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVERA 5 93 3.4 11.2 77.1 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 76 2.8 9.1 86.2 POOR 7 115 4.2 13.8 100.0 . 1795 65.9 Missing NOT SURE 8 96 3.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 834 Missing cases 1891 EVARH6B Q20, Republican House candidate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 72 2.6 8.5 8.5 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 141 5.2 16.6 25.1 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVERA 3 160 5.9 18.9 44.0 AVERAGE 4 202 7.4 23.8 67.9 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVERA 5 92 3.4 10.9 78.7 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 79 2.9 9.3 88.1 POOR 7 101 3.7 11.9 100.0 . 1796 65.9 Missing NOT SURE 8 82 3.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 847 Missing cases 1878 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVACON6B Q20, Congress Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 23 .8 2.5 2.5 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 83 3.0 9.2 11.8 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVERA 3 174 6.4 19.3 31.0 AVERAGE 4 303 11.1 33.6 64.6 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVERA 5 177 6.5 19.6 84.3 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 92 3.4 10.2 94.5 POOR 7 50 1.8 5.5 100.0 . 1782 65.4 Missing NOT SURE 8 41 1.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 902 Missing cases 1823 EVASC6B Q20, Supreme Court Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 15 .6 1.7 1.7 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 105 3.9 12.0 13.7 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVERA 3 193 7.1 22.1 35.8 AVERAGE 4 315 11.6 36.0 71.9 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVERA 5 124 4.6 14.2 86.0 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 67 2.5 7.7 93.7 POOR 7 55 2.0 6.3 100.0 . 1777 65.2 Missing NOT SURE 8 74 2.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 874 Missing cases 1851 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVAMIL6B Q20, US Military Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 74 2.7 8.4 8.4 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 222 8.1 25.1 33.5 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVERA 3 191 7.0 21.6 55.2 AVERAGE 4 222 8.1 25.1 80.3 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVERA 5 96 3.5 10.9 91.2 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 58 2.1 6.6 97.7 POOR 7 20 .7 2.3 100.0 . 1771 65.0 Missing NOT SURE 8 71 2.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 883 Missing cases 1842 EVAUN6B Q20, United Nations Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 16 .6 1.8 1.8 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 72 2.6 8.3 10.1 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVERA 3 143 5.2 16.5 26.6 AVERAGE 4 226 8.3 26.0 52.6 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVERA 5 129 4.7 14.9 67.5 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 116 4.3 13.4 80.9 POOR 7 166 6.1 19.1 100.0 . 1773 65.1 Missing NOT SURE 8 84 3.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 868 Missing cases 1857 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALAB6B Q20, labor unions Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 26 1.0 2.9 2.9 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 51 1.9 5.8 8.7 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVERA 3 113 4.1 12.8 21.5 AVERAGE 4 222 8.1 25.1 46.6 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVERA 5 125 4.6 14.1 60.7 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 138 5.1 15.6 76.4 POOR 7 209 7.7 23.6 100.0 . 1767 64.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 74 2.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 884 Missing cases 1841 EVABUS6B Q20, business corporations Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 16 .6 1.9 1.9 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 67 2.5 7.8 9.6 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVERA 3 133 4.9 15.4 25.0 AVERAGE 4 299 11.0 34.6 59.7 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVERA 5 152 5.6 17.6 77.3 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 100 3.7 11.6 88.9 POOR 7 96 3.5 11.1 100.0 . 1771 65.0 Missing NOT SURE 8 91 3.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 863 Missing cases 1862 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GOVRUN6B Q21, government is run: Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BY A FEW BIG INTERES 1 663 24.3 66.9 66.9 FOR ALL THE PEOPLE 2 328 12.0 33.1 100.0 . 1734 63.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 991 Missing cases 1734 NECON6B Q22, the nation as a whole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUCH BETTER 1 106 3.9 10.1 10.1 SOMEWHAT BETTER 2 405 14.9 38.7 48.9 ABOUT THE SAME 3 416 15.3 39.8 88.6 SOMEWHAT WORSE 4 98 3.6 9.4 98.0 MUCH WORSE 5 21 .8 2.0 100.0 . 1679 61.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1046 Missing cases 1679 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PECON6B Q22, you and your family Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUCH BETTER 1 81 3.0 7.9 7.9 SOMEWHAT BETTER 2 283 10.4 27.5 35.3 ABOUT THE SAME 3 532 19.5 51.7 87.0 SOMEWHAT WORSE 4 105 3.9 10.2 97.2 MUCH WORSE 5 29 1.1 2.8 100.0 . 1695 62.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1030 Missing cases 1695 FNECON6B Q23, the nation as a whole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUCH BETTER 1 39 1.4 3.7 3.7 SOMEWHAT BETTER 2 243 8.9 23.1 26.9 ABOUT THE SAME 3 536 19.7 51.0 77.9 SOMEWHAT WORSE 4 209 7.7 19.9 97.8 MUCH WORSE 5 23 .8 2.2 100.0 . 1675 61.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1050 Missing cases 1675 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FPECON6B Q23, you and your family Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUCH BETTER 1 34 1.2 3.3 3.3 SOMEWHAT BETTER 2 211 7.7 20.6 23.9 ABOUT THE SAME 3 640 23.5 62.4 86.3 SOMEWHAT WORSE 4 118 4.3 11.5 97.9 MUCH WORSE 5 22 .8 2.1 100.0 . 1700 62.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1025 Missing cases 1700 FNECPR6B Q24, How certain are you for Q23? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY CERTAIN 1 92 3.4 8.8 8.8 CERTAIN 2 495 18.2 47.5 56.3 SOMEWHAT UNCERTAIN 3 418 15.3 40.1 96.4 VERY UNCERTAIN 4 38 1.4 3.6 100.0 . 1682 61.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1043 Missing cases 1682 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BETINF6B Q25, I'm more informed than most Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 19 .7 2.0 2.0 DISAGREE 2 131 4.8 13.8 15.8 AGREE 3 463 17.0 48.7 64.5 STRONGLY AGREE 4 337 12.4 35.5 100.0 . 1698 62.3 Missing NOT SURE 5 77 2.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 950 Missing cases 1775 DEMPRO6B Q25, demonstrators allowed to protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 103 3.8 10.7 10.7 DISAGREE 2 248 9.1 25.7 36.4 AGREE 3 449 16.5 46.5 82.9 STRONGLY AGREE 4 165 6.1 17.1 100.0 . 1709 62.7 Missing NOT SURE 5 51 1.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 965 Missing cases 1760 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - POLVIO6B Q25, the police stop violent protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 33 1.2 3.3 3.3 DISAGREE 2 117 4.3 11.8 15.2 AGREE 3 607 22.3 61.3 76.5 STRONGLY AGREE 4 233 8.6 23.5 100.0 . 1700 62.4 Missing NOT SURE 5 35 1.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 990 Missing cases 1735 WELREP6B Q25, people like me are well represented Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 115 4.2 12.7 12.7 DISAGREE 2 417 15.3 46.2 59.0 AGREE 3 323 11.9 35.8 94.8 STRONGLY AGREE 4 47 1.7 5.2 100.0 . 1721 63.2 Missing NOT SURE 5 102 3.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 902 Missing cases 1823 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FRSPCH6B Q25, free speech granted to everyone Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 50 1.8 5.2 5.2 DISAGREE 2 202 7.4 21.0 26.3 AGREE 3 497 18.2 51.8 78.0 STRONGLY AGREE 4 211 7.7 22.0 100.0 . 1705 62.6 Missing NOT SURE 5 60 2.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 960 Missing cases 1765 POLNV6B Q25, the police stop disruptive protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 96 3.5 10.2 10.2 DISAGREE 2 255 9.4 27.0 37.2 AGREE 3 469 17.2 49.7 86.9 STRONGLY AGREE 4 124 4.6 13.1 100.0 . 1700 62.4 Missing NOT SURE 5 81 3.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 944 Missing cases 1781 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SPGOV6B Q25, speech against government Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 229 8.4 24.9 24.9 DISAGREE 2 278 10.2 30.2 55.1 AGREE 3 263 9.7 28.6 83.7 STRONGLY AGREE 4 150 5.5 16.3 100.0 . 1703 62.5 Missing NOT SURE 5 102 3.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 920 Missing cases 1805 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - REFPID6B Q26, Identify with Reform Party? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 62 2.3 6.0 6.0 NO 2 963 35.3 94.0 100.0 . 1700 62.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1025 Missing cases 1700 STRREF6B Q26a, How strongly? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY STRONGLY 1 4 .1 3.0 3.0 STRONGLY 2 25 .9 18.9 22.0 NOT SO STRONGLY 3 103 3.8 78.0 100.0 . 2593 95.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 132 Missing cases 2593 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RPFMLP6B Q27, memb local cmte, Rep former Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 840 30.8 77.9 77.9 CHECKED 1 238 8.7 22.1 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RPCMLP6B Q27, memb local cmte, Rep current Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 925 33.9 85.8 85.8 CHECKED 1 153 5.6 14.2 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 DPFMLP6B Q27, memb local cmte, Dem former Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 915 33.6 84.9 84.9 CHECKED 1 163 6.0 15.1 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DPCMLP6B Q27, memb local cmte, Dem current Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1004 36.8 93.1 93.1 CHECKED 1 74 2.7 6.9 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RECMLP6B Q27, memb local cmte, Reform current Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1070 39.3 99.3 99.3 CHECKED 1 8 .3 .7 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 RPFCLP6B Q27, chair local cmte, Rep former Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 960 35.2 89.1 89.1 CHECKED 1 118 4.3 10.9 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RPCCLP6B Q27, chair local cmte, Rep current Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1053 38.6 97.7 97.7 CHECKED 1 25 .9 2.3 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DPFCLP6B Q27, chair local cmte, Dem former Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1027 37.7 95.3 95.3 CHECKED 1 51 1.9 4.7 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 DPCCLP6B Q27, chair local cmte, Dem current Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1064 39.0 98.7 98.7 CHECKED 1 14 .5 1.3 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RECCLP6B Q27, chair local cmte, Ref current Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1072 39.3 99.4 99.4 CHECKED 1 6 .2 .6 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RPFOLP6B Q27, othr local office, Rep former Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 936 34.3 86.8 86.8 CHECKED 1 142 5.2 13.2 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 RPCOLP6B Q27, othr local office, Rep current Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1036 38.0 96.1 96.1 CHECKED 1 42 1.5 3.9 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEFOLP6B Q27, othr local office, Dem former Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1018 37.4 94.4 94.4 CHECKED 1 60 2.2 5.6 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DECOLP6B Q27, othr local office, Dem current Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1055 38.7 97.9 97.9 CHECKED 1 23 .8 2.1 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 RECOLP6B Q27, othr local office, Ref current Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1073 39.4 99.5 99.5 CHECKED 1 5 .2 .5 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RPFMCD6B Q27, memb district cmte, Rep former Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 970 35.6 90.0 90.0 CHECKED 1 108 4.0 10.0 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RPCMCD6B Q27, memb district cmte, Rep current Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1049 38.5 97.3 97.3 CHECKED 1 29 1.1 2.7 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 DPFMCD6B Q27, memb district cmte, Dem former Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1035 38.0 96.0 96.0 CHECKED 1 43 1.6 4.0 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DPCMCD6B Q27, memb district cmte, Dem current Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1064 39.0 98.7 98.7 CHECKED 1 14 .5 1.3 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RECMCD6B Q27, memb district cmte, Ref current Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1075 39.4 99.7 99.7 CHECKED 1 3 .1 .3 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 RPFMSC6B Q27, memb ste cent cmte, Rep former Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1037 38.1 96.2 96.2 CHECKED 1 41 1.5 3.8 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RPCMSC6B Q27, memb ste cent cmte, Rep current Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1063 39.0 98.6 98.6 CHECKED 1 15 .6 1.4 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DPFMSC6B Q27, memb ste cent cmte, Dem former Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1063 39.0 98.6 98.6 CHECKED 1 15 .6 1.4 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 DPCMSC6B Q27, memb ste cent cmte, Dem current Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1071 39.3 99.4 99.4 CHECKED 1 7 .3 .6 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RECMSC6B Q27, memb ste cent cmte, Ref current Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1075 39.4 99.7 99.7 CHECKED 1 3 .1 .3 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RPFOTH6B Q27, othr office, Rep former Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1022 37.5 94.8 94.8 CHECKED 1 56 2.1 5.2 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 RPCOTH6B Q27, othr office, Rep current Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1062 39.0 98.5 98.5 CHECKED 1 16 .6 1.5 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DPFOTH6B Q27, othr office, Dem former Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1060 38.9 98.3 98.3 CHECKED 1 18 .7 1.7 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DPCOTH6B Q27, othr office, Dem current Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1071 39.3 99.4 99.4 CHECKED 1 7 .3 .6 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 RECOTH6B Q27, othr office, Ref current Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1074 39.4 99.6 99.6 CHECKED 1 4 .1 .4 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NMTEA6B Q28, not member, teacher org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 505 18.5 46.8 46.8 CHECKED 1 573 21.0 53.2 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMTEA6B Q28, inactive member, teacher org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1044 38.3 96.8 96.8 CHECKED 1 34 1.2 3.2 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 COTEA6B Q28, convince, teacher org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1056 38.8 98.0 98.0 CHECKED 1 22 .8 2.0 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PDTEA6B Q28, paid dues, teacher org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1025 37.6 95.1 95.1 CHECKED 1 53 1.9 4.9 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AMTEA6B Q28, attended mtg, teacher org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1048 38.5 97.2 97.2 CHECKED 1 30 1.1 2.8 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 LRTEA6B Q28, leader role, teacher org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1049 38.5 97.3 97.3 CHECKED 1 29 1.1 2.7 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GMTEA6B Q28, gave money, teacher org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1054 38.7 97.8 97.8 CHECKED 1 24 .9 2.2 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OATEA6B Q28, other activities, teacher org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1062 39.0 98.5 98.5 CHECKED 1 16 .6 1.5 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 NMBUS6B Q28, not member, business org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 521 19.1 48.3 48.3 CHECKED 1 557 20.4 51.7 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMBUS6B Q28, inactive member, business org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1050 38.5 97.4 97.4 CHECKED 1 28 1.0 2.6 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - COBUS6B Q28, convince, business org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1068 39.2 99.1 99.1 CHECKED 1 10 .4 .9 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 PDBUS6B Q28, paid dues, business org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1029 37.8 95.5 95.5 CHECKED 1 49 1.8 4.5 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AMBUS6B Q28, attended mtg, business org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1044 38.3 96.8 96.8 CHECKED 1 34 1.2 3.2 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LRBUS6B Q28, leader role, business orga Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1063 39.0 98.6 98.6 CHECKED 1 15 .6 1.4 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 GMBUS6B Q28, gave money, business org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1065 39.1 98.8 98.8 CHECKED 1 13 .5 1.2 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OABUS6B Q28, other activities, business org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1069 39.2 99.2 99.2 CHECKED 1 9 .3 .8 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NMVET6B Q28, not member, vets group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 558 20.5 51.8 51.8 CHECKED 1 520 19.1 48.2 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 IMVET6B Q28, inactive member, vets group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1036 38.0 96.1 96.1 CHECKED 1 42 1.5 3.9 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - COVET6B Q28, convince, vets group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1062 39.0 98.5 98.5 CHECKED 1 16 .6 1.5 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PDVET6B Q28, paid dues, vets group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 984 36.1 91.3 91.3 CHECKED 1 94 3.4 8.7 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 AMVET6B Q28, attended mtg, vets group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1045 38.3 96.9 96.9 CHECKED 1 33 1.2 3.1 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LRVET6B Q28, leader role, vets group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1059 38.9 98.2 98.2 CHECKED 1 19 .7 1.8 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GMVET6B Q28, gave money, vets group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1030 37.8 95.5 95.5 CHECKED 1 48 1.8 4.5 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 OAVET6B Q28, other activities, vets group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1064 39.0 98.7 98.7 CHECKED 1 14 .5 1.3 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NMWRG6B Q28, not member, womens group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 501 18.4 46.5 46.5 CHECKED 1 577 21.2 53.5 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMWRG6B Q28, inactive member, womens group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1065 39.1 98.8 98.8 CHECKED 1 13 .5 1.2 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 COWRG6B Q28, convince, womens group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1072 39.3 99.4 99.4 CHECKED 1 6 .2 .6 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PDWRG6B Q28, paid dues, womens group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1049 38.5 97.3 97.3 CHECKED 1 29 1.1 2.7 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AMWRG6B Q28, attended mtg, womens group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1069 39.2 99.2 99.2 CHECKED 1 9 .3 .8 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 LRWRG6B Q28, leader role, womens group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1076 39.5 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 2 .1 .2 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GMWRG6B Q28, gave money, womens group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1062 39.0 98.5 98.5 CHECKED 1 16 .6 1.5 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OAWRG6B Q28, other activities, womens group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1072 39.3 99.4 99.4 CHECKED 1 6 .2 .6 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 NMCIVL6B Q28, not member, civil rts group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 518 19.0 48.1 48.1 CHECKED 1 560 20.6 51.9 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMCIVL6B Q28, inactive member, civil rts group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1053 38.6 97.7 97.7 CHECKED 1 25 .9 2.3 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - COCIVL6B Q28, convince, civil rts group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1071 39.3 99.4 99.4 CHECKED 1 7 .3 .6 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 PDCIVL6B Q28, paid dues, civil rts group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1039 38.1 96.4 96.4 CHECKED 1 39 1.4 3.6 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AMCIVL6B Q28, attended mtg, civil rts group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1062 39.0 98.5 98.5 CHECKED 1 16 .6 1.5 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LACIVL6B Q28, leader role, civil rts group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1072 39.3 99.4 99.4 CHECKED 1 6 .2 .6 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 GMCIVL6B Q28, gave money, civil rts group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1054 38.7 97.8 97.8 CHECKED 1 24 .9 2.2 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OACIVL6B Q28, other activities, civil rts group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1068 39.2 99.1 99.1 CHECKED 1 10 .4 .9 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NMENV6B Q28, not member, enviro group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 574 21.1 53.2 53.2 CHECKED 1 504 18.5 46.8 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 IMENV6B Q28, inactive member, enviro group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1035 38.0 96.0 96.0 CHECKED 1 43 1.6 4.0 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - COENV6B Q28, convince, enviro group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1066 39.1 98.9 98.9 CHECKED 1 12 .4 1.1 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PDENV6B Q28, paid dues, enviro group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 995 36.5 92.3 92.3 CHECKED 1 83 3.0 7.7 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 AMENV6B Q28, attended mtg, enviro group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1049 38.5 97.3 97.3 CHECKED 1 29 1.1 2.7 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LRENV6B Q28, leader role, enviro group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1067 39.2 99.0 99.0 CHECKED 1 11 .4 1.0 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GMENV6B Q28, gave money, enviro group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1032 37.9 95.7 95.7 CHECKED 1 46 1.7 4.3 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 OAENV6B Q28, other activities, enviro group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1064 39.0 98.7 98.7 CHECKED 1 14 .5 1.3 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NMNPIG6B Q28, not member, non-part int grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 548 20.1 50.8 50.8 CHECKED 1 530 19.4 49.2 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMNPIG6B Q28, inactive member, non-part int grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1044 38.3 96.8 96.8 CHECKED 1 34 1.2 3.2 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 CONPIG6B Q28, convince, non-part int grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1067 39.2 99.0 99.0 CHECKED 1 11 .4 1.0 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PDNPIG6B Q28, paid dues, non-part int grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1027 37.7 95.3 95.3 CHECKED 1 51 1.9 4.7 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AMNPIG6B Q28, attended mtg, non-part int grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1053 38.6 97.7 97.7 CHECKED 1 25 .9 2.3 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 LRNPIG6B Q28, leader role, non-part int grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1067 39.2 99.0 99.0 CHECKED 1 11 .4 1.0 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GMNPIG6B Q28, gave money, non-part int grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1042 38.2 96.7 96.7 CHECKED 1 36 1.3 3.3 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OANPIG6B Q28, other activities, non-part int grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1069 39.2 99.2 99.2 CHECKED 1 9 .3 .8 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 NMFARM6B Q28, not member, farm org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 560 20.6 51.9 51.9 CHECKED 1 518 19.0 48.1 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMFARM6B Q28, inactive member, farm org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1023 37.5 94.9 94.9 CHECKED 1 55 2.0 5.1 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - COFARM6B Q28, convince, farm org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1064 39.0 98.7 98.7 CHECKED 1 14 .5 1.3 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 PDFARM6B Q28, paid dues, farm org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 998 36.6 92.6 92.6 CHECKED 1 80 2.9 7.4 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AMFARM6B Q28, attended mtg, farm org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1050 38.5 97.4 97.4 CHECKED 1 28 1.0 2.6 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LRFARM6B Q28, leader role, farm org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1065 39.1 98.8 98.8 CHECKED 1 13 .5 1.2 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 GMFARM6B Q28, gave money, farm org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1066 39.1 98.9 98.9 CHECKED 1 12 .4 1.1 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OAFARM6B Q28, other activities, farm org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1069 39.2 99.2 99.2 CHECKED 1 9 .3 .8 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NMEVAN6B Q28, not member, political evang grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 492 18.1 45.6 45.6 CHECKED 1 586 21.5 54.4 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 IMEVAN6B Q28, inactive member, political evang gr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1070 39.3 99.3 99.3 CHECKED 1 8 .3 .7 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - COEVAN6B Q28, convince, political evang grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1070 39.3 99.3 99.3 CHECKED 1 8 .3 .7 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PDEVAN6B Q28, paid dues, political evang grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1062 39.0 98.5 98.5 CHECKED 1 16 .6 1.5 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 AMEVAN6B Q28, attended mtg, political evang grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1068 39.2 99.1 99.1 CHECKED 1 10 .4 .9 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LREVAN6B Q28, leader role, political evang grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1075 39.4 99.7 99.7 CHECKED 1 3 .1 .3 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GMEVAN6B Q28, gave money, political evang grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1061 38.9 98.4 98.4 CHECKED 1 17 .6 1.6 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 OAEVAN6B Q28, other activities, political evang g Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1071 39.3 99.4 99.4 CHECKED 1 7 .3 .6 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NMABOR6B Q28, not member, anti/pro-abortion grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 537 19.7 49.8 49.8 CHECKED 1 541 19.9 50.2 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMABOR6B Q28, inactive member, anti/pro-abortion Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1055 38.7 97.9 97.9 CHECKED 1 23 .8 2.1 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 COABOR6B Q28, convince, anti/pro-abortion grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1060 38.9 98.3 98.3 CHECKED 1 18 .7 1.7 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PDABOR6B Q28, paid dues, anti/pro-abortion grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1051 38.6 97.5 97.5 CHECKED 1 27 1.0 2.5 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AMABOR6B Q28, attended mtg, anti/pro-abortion grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1059 38.9 98.2 98.2 CHECKED 1 19 .7 1.8 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 LRABOR6B Q28, leader role, anti/pro-abortion grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1073 39.4 99.5 99.5 CHECKED 1 5 .2 .5 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GMABOR6B Q28, gave money, anti/pro-abortion grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1041 38.2 96.6 96.6 CHECKED 1 37 1.4 3.4 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OAABOR6B Q28, other activities, anti/pro-abortion Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1062 39.0 98.5 98.5 CHECKED 1 16 .6 1.5 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 NMLIBG6B Q28, not member, liberal ideol grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 520 19.1 48.2 48.2 CHECKED 1 558 20.5 51.8 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMLIBG6B Q28, inactive member, liberal ideol grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1063 39.0 98.6 98.6 CHECKED 1 15 .6 1.4 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - COLIBG6B Q28, convince, liberal ideol grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1076 39.5 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 2 .1 .2 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 PDLIBG6B Q28, paid dues, liberal ideol grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1051 38.6 97.5 97.5 CHECKED 1 27 1.0 2.5 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AMLIBG6B Q28, attended mtg, liberal ideol grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1069 39.2 99.2 99.2 CHECKED 1 9 .3 .8 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LRLIBG6B Q28, leader role, liberal ideol grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1074 39.4 99.6 99.6 CHECKED 1 4 .1 .4 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 GMLIBG6B Q28, gave money, liberal ideol grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1062 39.0 98.5 98.5 CHECKED 1 16 .6 1.5 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OALIBG6B Q28, other activities, liberal ideol grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1071 39.3 99.4 99.4 CHECKED 1 7 .3 .6 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NMCONG6B Q28, not member, conserv ideol grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 523 19.2 48.5 48.5 CHECKED 1 555 20.4 51.5 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 IMCONG6B Q28, inactive member, conserv ideol grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1069 39.2 99.2 99.2 CHECKED 1 9 .3 .8 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - COCONG6B Q28, convince, conserv ideol grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1069 39.2 99.2 99.2 CHECKED 1 9 .3 .8 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PDCONG6B Q28, paid dues, conserv ideol grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1051 38.6 97.5 97.5 CHECKED 1 27 1.0 2.5 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 AMCONG6B Q28, attended mtg, conserv ideol grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1060 38.9 98.3 98.3 CHECKED 1 18 .7 1.7 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LRCONG6B Q28, leader role, conserv ideol grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1070 39.3 99.3 99.3 CHECKED 1 8 .3 .7 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GMCONG6B Q28, gave money, conserv ideol grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1057 38.8 98.1 98.1 CHECKED 1 21 .8 1.9 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 OACONG6B Q28, other activities, conserv ideol grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1069 39.2 99.2 99.2 CHECKED 1 9 .3 .8 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NMCRIM6B Q28, not member, crime watch grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 591 21.7 54.8 54.8 CHECKED 1 487 17.9 45.2 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMCRIM6B Q28, inactive member, crime watch grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1025 37.6 95.1 95.1 CHECKED 1 53 1.9 4.9 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 COCRIM6B Q28, convince, crime watch grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1057 38.8 98.1 98.1 CHECKED 1 21 .8 1.9 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PDCRIM6B Q28, paid dues, crime watch grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1053 38.6 97.7 97.7 CHECKED 1 25 .9 2.3 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AMCRIM6B Q28, attended mtg, crime watch grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1029 37.8 95.5 95.5 CHECKED 1 49 1.8 4.5 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 LRCRIM6B Q28, leader role, crime watch grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1060 38.9 98.3 98.3 CHECKED 1 18 .7 1.7 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GMCRIM6B Q28, gave money, crime watch grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1063 39.0 98.6 98.6 CHECKED 1 15 .6 1.4 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OACRIM6B Q28, other activities, crime watch grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1047 38.4 97.1 97.1 CHECKED 1 31 1.1 2.9 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 NMEDUC6B Q28, not member, educational grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 567 20.8 52.6 52.6 CHECKED 1 511 18.8 47.4 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMEDUC6B Q28, inactive member, educational grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1041 38.2 96.6 96.6 CHECKED 1 37 1.4 3.4 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - COEDUC6B Q28, convince, educational grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1061 38.9 98.4 98.4 CHECKED 1 17 .6 1.6 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 PDEDUC6B Q28, paid dues, educational grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1029 37.8 95.5 95.5 CHECKED 1 49 1.8 4.5 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AMEDUC6B Q28, attended mtg, educational grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1026 37.7 95.2 95.2 CHECKED 1 52 1.9 4.8 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LREDUC6B Q28, leader role, educational grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1055 38.7 97.9 97.9 CHECKED 1 23 .8 2.1 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 GMEDUC6B Q28, gave money, educational grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1051 38.6 97.5 97.5 CHECKED 1 27 1.0 2.5 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OAEDUC6B Q28, other activities, educational grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1048 38.5 97.2 97.2 CHECKED 1 30 1.1 2.8 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NMCHUR6B Q28, not member, church group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 832 30.5 77.2 77.2 CHECKED 1 246 9.0 22.8 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 IMCHUR6B Q28, inactive member, church group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 979 35.9 90.8 90.8 CHECKED 1 99 3.6 9.2 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - COCHUR6B Q28, convince, church group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1002 36.8 92.9 92.9 CHECKED 1 76 2.8 7.1 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PDCHUR6B Q28, paid dues, church group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 931 34.2 86.4 86.4 CHECKED 1 147 5.4 13.6 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 AMCHUR6B Q28, attended mtg, church group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 858 31.5 79.6 79.6 CHECKED 1 220 8.1 20.4 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LRCHUR6B Q28, leader role, church group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 884 32.4 82.0 82.0 CHECKED 1 194 7.1 18.0 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GMCHUR6B Q28, gave money, church group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 811 29.8 75.2 75.2 CHECKED 1 267 9.8 24.8 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 OACHUR6B Q28, other activities, church group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 926 34.0 85.9 85.9 CHECKED 1 152 5.6 14.1 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NMUWSA6B Q28, not member, UWSA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 496 18.2 46.0 46.0 CHECKED 1 582 21.4 54.0 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMUWSA6B Q28, inactive member, UWSA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1069 39.2 99.2 99.2 CHECKED 1 9 .3 .8 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 COUWSA6B Q28, convince, UWSA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1076 39.5 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 2 .1 .2 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PDUWSA6B Q28, paid dues, UWSA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1073 39.4 99.5 99.5 CHECKED 1 5 .2 .5 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AMUWSA6B Q28, attended mtg, UWSA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1078 39.6 100.0 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 LRUWSA6B Q28, leader role, UWSA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1076 39.5 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 2 .1 .2 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GMUWSA6B Q28, gave money, UWSA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1074 39.4 99.6 99.6 CHECKED 1 4 .1 .4 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OAUWSA6B Q28, other activities, UWSA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1077 39.5 99.9 99.9 CHECKED 1 1 .0 .1 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 NMCIVC6B Q28, not member, civic group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 638 23.4 59.2 59.2 CHECKED 1 440 16.1 40.8 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMCIVC6B Q28, inactive member, civic group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1036 38.0 96.1 96.1 CHECKED 1 42 1.5 3.9 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - COCIVC6B Q28, convince, civic group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1029 37.8 95.5 95.5 CHECKED 1 49 1.8 4.5 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 PDCIVC6B Q28, paid dues, civic group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 959 35.2 89.0 89.0 CHECKED 1 119 4.4 11.0 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AMCIVC6B Q28, attended mtg, civic group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 965 35.4 89.5 89.5 CHECKED 1 113 4.1 10.5 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LRCIVC6B Q28, leader role, civic group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 990 36.3 91.8 91.8 CHECKED 1 88 3.2 8.2 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 GMCIVC6B Q28, gave money, civic group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1004 36.8 93.1 93.1 CHECKED 1 74 2.7 6.9 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OACIVC6B Q28, other activities, civic group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 1025 37.6 95.1 95.1 CHECKED 1 53 1.9 4.9 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TRUGOV6B Q29, the US Government Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent JUST ABOUT ALWAYS 1 37 1.4 3.5 3.5 MOST OF THE TIME 2 402 14.8 38.4 41.9 ONLY SOME OF THE TIM 3 515 18.9 49.1 91.0 ALMOST NEVER 4 73 2.7 7.0 98.0 NEVER 5 21 .8 2.0 100.0 . 1677 61.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1048 Missing cases 1677 TRSGOV6B Q29, your state government Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent JUST ABOUT ALWAYS 1 42 1.5 4.0 4.0 MOST OF THE TIME 2 550 20.2 52.5 56.5 ONLY SOME OF THE TIM 3 399 14.6 38.1 94.7 ALMOST NEVER 4 42 1.5 4.0 98.7 NEVER 5 14 .5 1.3 100.0 . 1678 61.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1047 Missing cases 1678 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TRLGOV6B Q29, your local governemnt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent JUST ABOUT ALWAYS 1 108 4.0 10.3 10.3 MOST OF THE TIME 2 568 20.8 54.2 64.5 ONLY SOME OF THE TIM 3 308 11.3 29.4 93.9 ALMOST NEVER 4 51 1.9 4.9 98.8 NEVER 5 13 .5 1.2 100.0 . 1677 61.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1048 Missing cases 1677 FFLDPO6B Q30, local Democratic Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 240 8.8 28.8 28.8 ONE OR TWO 2 188 6.9 22.6 51.4 THREE OR MORE 3 405 14.9 48.6 100.0 . 1805 66.2 Missing NOT SURE 4 87 3.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 833 Missing cases 1892 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FFLRPO6B Q30, local Republican Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 233 8.6 29.0 29.0 ONE OR TWO 2 176 6.5 21.9 50.9 THREE OR MORE 3 395 14.5 49.1 100.0 . 1829 67.1 Missing NOT SURE 4 92 3.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 804 Missing cases 1921 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FFUWSA6B Q30, United We Stand America Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 536 19.7 90.7 90.7 ONE OR TWO 2 39 1.4 6.6 97.3 THREE OR MORE 3 16 .6 2.7 100.0 . 1929 70.8 Missing NOT SURE 4 205 7.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 591 Missing cases 2134 FFREFP6B Q30, Reform Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 534 19.6 90.8 90.8 ONE OR TWO 2 37 1.4 6.3 97.1 THREE OR MORE 3 17 .6 2.9 100.0 . 1934 71.0 Missing NOT SURE 4 203 7.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 588 Missing cases 2137 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FFTEA6B Q30, teacher's organization Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 270 9.9 34.6 34.6 ONE OR TWO 2 214 7.9 27.4 62.1 THREE OR MORE 3 296 10.9 37.9 100.0 . 1860 68.3 Missing NOT SURE 4 85 3.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 780 Missing cases 1945 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FFBUS6B Q30, business organization Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 321 11.8 49.1 49.1 ONE OR TWO 2 127 4.7 19.4 68.5 THREE OR MORE 3 206 7.6 31.5 100.0 . 1914 70.2 Missing NOT SURE 4 157 5.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 654 Missing cases 2071 FFVET6B Q30, veteran's group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 263 9.7 35.9 35.9 ONE OR TWO 2 185 6.8 25.3 61.2 THREE OR MORE 3 284 10.4 38.8 100.0 . 1875 68.8 Missing NOT SURE 4 118 4.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 732 Missing cases 1993 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FFWRG6B Q30, women's rights group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 434 15.9 67.3 67.3 ONE OR TWO 2 106 3.9 16.4 83.7 THREE OR MORE 3 105 3.9 16.3 100.0 . 1920 70.5 Missing NOT SURE 4 160 5.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 645 Missing cases 2080 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FFCIVL6B Q30, civil rights group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 449 16.5 67.0 67.0 ONE OR TWO 2 84 3.1 12.5 79.6 THREE OR MORE 3 137 5.0 20.4 100.0 . 1920 70.5 Missing NOT SURE 4 135 5.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 670 Missing cases 2055 FFENV6B Q30, environmental group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 371 13.6 55.1 55.1 ONE OR TWO 2 149 5.5 22.1 77.3 THREE OR MORE 3 153 5.6 22.7 100.0 . 1915 70.3 Missing NOT SURE 4 137 5.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 673 Missing cases 2052 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FFNPIG6B Q30, non-partisan interest group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 384 14.1 58.1 58.1 ONE OR TWO 2 134 4.9 20.3 78.4 THREE OR MORE 3 143 5.2 21.6 100.0 . 1910 70.1 Missing NOT SURE 4 154 5.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 661 Missing cases 2064 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FFFARM6B Q30, farm organization Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 357 13.1 48.5 48.5 ONE OR TWO 2 153 5.6 20.8 69.3 THREE OR MORE 3 226 8.3 30.7 100.0 . 1895 69.5 Missing NOT SURE 4 94 3.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 736 Missing cases 1989 FFEVAN6B Q30, political concerned evang group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 451 16.6 67.5 67.5 ONE OR TWO 2 90 3.3 13.5 81.0 THREE OR MORE 3 127 4.7 19.0 100.0 . 1919 70.4 Missing NOT SURE 4 138 5.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 668 Missing cases 2057 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FFABOR6B Q30, anti-abortion or pro-life group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 389 14.3 56.6 56.6 ONE OR TWO 2 132 4.8 19.2 75.8 THREE OR MORE 3 166 6.1 24.2 100.0 . 1904 69.9 Missing NOT SURE 4 134 4.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 687 Missing cases 2038 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FFLIBG6B Q30, liberal ideological group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 466 17.1 72.6 72.6 ONE OR TWO 2 81 3.0 12.6 85.2 THREE OR MORE 3 95 3.5 14.8 100.0 . 1930 70.8 Missing NOT SURE 4 153 5.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 642 Missing cases 2083 FFCONG6B Q30, conservative ideological group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 419 15.4 65.2 65.2 ONE OR TWO 2 93 3.4 14.5 79.6 THREE OR MORE 3 131 4.8 20.4 100.0 . 1930 70.8 Missing NOT SURE 4 152 5.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 643 Missing cases 2082 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FFCRIM6B Q30, crime or neighborhood watch group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 321 11.8 46.3 46.3 ONE OR TWO 2 172 6.3 24.8 71.1 THREE OR MORE 3 200 7.3 28.9 100.0 . 1901 69.8 Missing NOT SURE 4 131 4.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 693 Missing cases 2032 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FFEDUC6B Q30, educational group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 206 7.6 27.4 27.4 ONE OR TWO 2 185 6.8 24.6 52.0 THREE OR MORE 3 361 13.2 48.0 100.0 . 1878 68.9 Missing NOT SURE 4 95 3.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 752 Missing cases 1973 FFCHUR6B Q30, church group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 88 3.2 9.9 9.9 ONE OR TWO 2 140 5.1 15.7 25.6 THREE OR MORE 3 664 24.4 74.4 100.0 . 1787 65.6 Missing NOT SURE 4 46 1.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 892 Missing cases 1833 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FFCIVC6B Q30, civic group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 170 6.2 21.7 21.7 ONE OR TWO 2 176 6.5 22.4 44.1 THREE OR MORE 3 438 16.1 55.9 100.0 . 1853 68.0 Missing NOT SURE 4 88 3.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 784 Missing cases 1941 PIDSPO6B Q31, PID your spouse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACTIVE DEMOCRAT 1 179 6.6 20.1 20.1 INACTIVE DEMOCRAT 2 227 8.3 25.5 45.6 ACTIVE REPUBLICAN 3 206 7.6 23.1 68.8 INACTIVE REPUBLICAN 4 190 7.0 21.3 90.1 ACTIVE INDEPENDENT 5 29 1.1 3.3 93.4 INACTIVE INDEPENDENT 6 59 2.2 6.6 100.0 . 1835 67.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 890 Missing cases 1835 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PIDMOM6B Q31, PID your mother Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACTIVE DEMOCRAT 1 148 5.4 15.1 15.1 INACTIVE DEMOCRAT 2 352 12.9 36.0 51.2 ACTIVE REPUBLICAN 3 116 4.3 11.9 63.1 INACTIVE REPUBLICAN 4 261 9.6 26.7 89.8 ACTIVE INDEPENDENT 5 26 1.0 2.7 92.4 INACTIVE INDEPENDENT 6 74 2.7 7.6 100.0 . 1748 64.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 977 Missing cases 1748 PIDDAD6B Q31, PID your father Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACTIVE DEMOCRAT 1 198 7.3 20.3 20.3 INACTIVE DEMOCRAT 2 282 10.3 28.9 49.2 ACTIVE REPUBLICAN 3 165 6.1 16.9 66.1 INACTIVE REPUBLICAN 4 241 8.8 24.7 90.8 ACTIVE INDEPENDENT 5 28 1.0 2.9 93.6 INACTIVE INDEPENDENT 6 62 2.3 6.4 100.0 . 1749 64.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 976 Missing cases 1749 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SCHOOL6B Q32, formal schooling completed? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent GRADE SCHOOL OR LESS 1 11 .4 1.1 1.1 SOME HIGH SCHOOL 9-1 2 24 .9 2.3 3.4 GRADUATED HIGH SCHOO 3 184 6.8 17.7 21.1 SOME COLLEGE 13-15YR 4 253 9.3 24.4 45.4 COLLEGE GRADUATE 5 270 9.9 26.0 71.4 GRADUATE SCHOOL 6 297 10.9 28.6 100.0 . 1686 61.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1039 Missing cases 1686 AGE6B Q33, age Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 30-39 3 41 1.5 3.9 3.9 40-49 4 112 4.1 10.7 14.6 50-59 5 207 7.6 19.7 34.3 60-64 6 135 5.0 12.8 47.1 65 AND OLDER 7 556 20.4 52.9 100.0 . 1674 61.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1051 Missing cases 1674 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SEX6B Q34, sex Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MALE 1 554 20.3 52.9 52.9 FEMALE 2 494 18.1 47.1 100.0 . 1677 61.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1048 Missing cases 1677 RACE6B Q35, race Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent WHITE 1 985 36.1 94.3 94.3 BLACK AFRICAN-AMERIC 2 54 2.0 5.2 99.5 ASIAN-AMERICAN 3 1 .0 .1 99.6 HISPANIC-LATINO 4 2 .1 .2 99.8 NATIVE AMERICAN 5 2 .1 .2 100.0 . 1671 61.3 Missing OTHER WRITE-IN 6 10 .4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1044 Missing cases 1681 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INCOME6B Q36, approx family income before taxes Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNDER $20000 1 120 4.4 11.9 11.9 $20000-$39999 2 300 11.0 29.9 41.8 $40000-$59999 3 252 9.2 25.1 66.9 $60000-$79999 4 145 5.3 14.4 81.3 $80000-$99999 5 73 2.7 7.3 88.6 OVER $100000 6 115 4.2 11.4 100.0 . 1720 63.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1005 Missing cases 1720 REL6B Q37, religious preference Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CATHOLIC 1 197 7.2 19.5 19.5 JEWISH 2 14 .5 1.4 20.9 PROTESTANT (INCL. BA 3 713 26.2 70.7 91.7 NO RELIGIOUS PREFERE 4 84 3.1 8.3 100.0 . 1674 61.4 Missing OTHER WRITE-IN 5 43 1.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1008 Missing cases 1717 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HOWREL6B Q38, How religious are you? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY RELIGIOUS 1 229 8.4 21.9 21.9 FAIRLY RELIGIOUS 2 586 21.5 56.0 77.9 NOT VERY RELIGIOUS 3 163 6.0 15.6 93.5 NOT RELIGIOUS AT ALL 4 68 2.5 6.5 100.0 . 1670 61.3 Missing NOT SURE 5 9 .3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1046 Missing cases 1679 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BNAG6B Q39, Are you a born-again Christian? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 278 10.2 26.9 26.9 NO 2 754 27.7 73.1 100.0 . 1693 62.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1032 Missing cases 1693 FUNDCH6B Q40, Are you a fundamentalist Christian? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 140 5.1 13.8 13.8 NO 2 872 32.0 86.2 100.0 . 1713 62.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1012 Missing cases 1713 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCSOC6B Q41, political philosophy on social issu Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 73 2.7 7.2 7.2 LIBERAL 2 254 9.3 25.0 32.2 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 122 4.5 12.0 44.2 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 166 6.1 16.3 60.5 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 115 4.2 11.3 71.9 CONSERVATIVE 6 230 8.4 22.6 94.5 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 56 2.1 5.5 100.0 . 1677 61.5 Missing OTHER WRITE-IN 8 19 .7 Missing NOT SURE 9 13 .5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1016 Missing cases 1709 LCECON6B Q42, political philosophy on economic is Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 13 .5 1.3 1.3 LIBERAL 2 112 4.1 10.8 12.1 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 149 5.5 14.4 26.4 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 204 7.5 19.7 46.1 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 160 5.9 15.4 61.6 CONSERVATIVE 6 320 11.7 30.9 92.5 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 78 2.9 7.5 100.0 . 1665 61.1 Missing OTHER WRITE-IN 8 6 .2 Missing NOT SURE 9 18 .7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1036 Missing cases 1689 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONTH6B Q43, month Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 6 .2 .6 .6 2 60 2.2 5.6 6.2 3 19 .7 1.8 8.0 4 2 .1 .2 8.1 9 1 .0 .1 8.2 10 2 .1 .2 8.4 11 943 34.6 88.2 96.6 12 36 1.3 3.4 100.0 . 1656 60.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1069 Missing cases 1656 DAY6B Q43, day Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 2 .1 .2 .2 1 11 .4 1.0 1.2 2 7 .3 .7 1.9 3 7 .3 .7 2.6 4 8 .3 .8 3.3 5 3 .1 .3 3.6 6 4 .1 .4 4.0 7 4 .1 .4 4.4 8 89 3.3 8.4 12.8 9 109 4.0 10.3 23.1 10 79 2.9 7.5 30.6 11 73 2.7 6.9 37.5 12 98 3.6 9.3 46.8 13 77 2.8 7.3 54.1 14 62 2.3 5.9 60.0 15 42 1.5 4.0 64.0 16 41 1.5 3.9 67.9 17 30 1.1 2.8 70.7 18 66 2.4 6.3 77.0 19 51 1.9 4.8 81.8 20 39 1.4 3.7 85.5 21 29 1.1 2.7 88.2 22 33 1.2 3.1 91.4 23 24 .9 2.3 93.6 24 16 .6 1.5 95.2 25 18 .7 1.7 96.9 26 11 .4 1.0 97.9 27 7 .3 .7 98.6 28 7 .3 .7 99.2 29 7 .3 .7 99.9 30 1 .0 .1 100.0 . 1670 61.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1055 Missing cases 1670 YEAR6B Q43, year Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1663 61.0 61.0 61.0 * 1 .0 .0 61.1 2 1 .0 .0 61.1 6 1 .0 .0 61.1 ** 1 .0 .0 61.2 *6 2 .1 .1 61.2 *9 1 .0 .0 61.3 06 2 .1 .1 61.4 13 1 .0 .0 61.4 15 1 .0 .0 61.4 37 1 .0 .0 61.5 55 1 .0 .0 61.5 6 1 .0 .0 61.5 76 1 .0 .0 61.6 86 1 .0 .0 61.6 9* 1 .0 .0 61.7 95 1 .0 .0 61.7 96 954 35.0 35.0 96.7 97 88 3.2 3.2 99.9 98 2 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2725 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RESPON6B response variable Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 1078 39.6 100.0 100.0 . 1647 60.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 2725 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1078 Missing cases 1647