Codebook for the 1992-1996 panel study of Democratic and Republican Caucus Attenders in Iowa and Virginia. Dataset includes November waves in 1992 and 1994, and nomination and November waves in 1996. PIs: Ronald B. Rapoport and Walter J. Stone **********1992 Post-election Wave********** INT92G2 Q1 Interest in pres campaign Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent very interested 1 995 86.7 87.1 87.1 somewhat interested 2 135 11.8 11.8 98.9 not very interested 3 12 1.0 1.0 99.9 not at all intereste 4 1 .1 .1 100.0 . 5 .4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1143 Missing cases 5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PART2 Q2 Participated in nomination race Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 1026 89.4 89.8 89.8 no 2 117 10.2 10.2 100.0 . 5 .4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1143 Missing cases 5 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PARTPTY2 Q2 If yes, which party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent dem 1 660 57.5 65.8 65.8 rep 2 343 29.9 34.2 100.0 . 145 12.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1003 Missing cases 145 PREF92D Q3 Preferred candidate for 1992 D nom Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent brown 1 53 4.6 5.5 5.5 clinton 2 368 32.1 38.2 43.7 kerrey 3 46 4.0 4.8 48.5 harkin 4 202 17.6 21.0 69.5 tsongas 5 135 11.8 14.0 83.5 none of the above 6 159 13.9 16.5 100.0 . 185 16.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 963 Missing cases 185 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PREF92R Q3 Preferred candidate for 1992 R nom Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent buchanan 1 37 3.2 5.0 5.0 bush 2 409 35.6 55.4 60.4 none of the above 3 292 25.4 39.6 100.0 . 410 35.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 738 Missing cases 410 VOTE92 Q4 Vote in 1992 pres election Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent bush 1 365 31.8 32.4 32.4 clinton 2 706 61.5 62.6 94.9 perot 3 57 5.0 5.1 100.0 . 10 .9 Missing other 4 8 .7 Missing did not vote 5 2 .2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1128 Missing cases 20 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HSEVOT92 Q5 Vote in House election Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent dem 1 682 59.4 62.3 62.3 rep 2 412 35.9 37.7 100.0 . 14 1.2 Missing other 3 16 1.4 Missing did not vote 4 24 2.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1094 Missing cases 54 PTYID2 Q6 Describe your party affiliation Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strong dem 1 473 41.2 41.6 41.6 dem, not so strong 2 145 12.6 12.8 54.4 independent, lean de 3 100 8.7 8.8 63.1 independent 4 20 1.7 1.8 64.9 independent, lean re 5 55 4.8 4.8 69.7 rep, not so strong 6 97 8.4 8.5 78.3 strong rep 7 247 21.5 21.7 100.0 . 6 .5 Missing other party 8 5 .4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1137 Missing cases 11 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ALWAYS2 Q7 Characterize self as someone who Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent work always 1 493 42.9 46.5 46.5 works candidates 2 567 49.4 53.5 100.0 . 88 7.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1060 Missing cases 88 LIBCON2 Q8 Describe your political philosophy Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent extremely lib 1 56 4.9 5.0 5.0 lib 2 291 25.3 26.0 31.0 slightly lib 3 177 15.4 15.8 46.8 middle-of-the road 4 171 14.9 15.3 62.1 slightly conservativ 5 121 10.5 10.8 72.9 conservative 6 254 22.1 22.7 95.5 extremely cons 7 50 4.4 4.5 100.0 . 14 1.2 Missing not sure 8 14 1.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1120 Missing cases 28 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INFL2 Q9 Between now and 1996, most likely to Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent work within dem pty 1 435 37.9 38.4 38.4 work within rep pty 2 237 20.6 20.9 59.3 work within 3rd part 3 22 1.9 1.9 61.2 stay involved, but n 4 241 21.0 21.3 82.5 not be involved in p 5 55 4.8 4.9 87.3 not sure at this tim 6 144 12.5 12.7 100.0 . 14 1.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1134 Missing cases 14 SIGNJB2 Q10(BEFORE) Signatures, Brown Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 3 .3 100.0 100.0 . 1145 99.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 3 Missing cases 1145 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LMONJB2 Q10(BEFORE) Gave 100 or less, Brown Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 19 1.7 100.0 100.0 . 1129 98.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 19 Missing cases 1129 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HMONJB2 Q10(BEFORE) Gave > $100, Brown Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 3 .3 100.0 100.0 . 1145 99.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 3 Missing cases 1145 CANVJB2 Q10(BEFORE) Canvassing, Brown Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 6 .5 100.0 100.0 . 1142 99.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 6 Missing cases 1142 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVJB2 Q10(BEFORE) Convince friends, Brown Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 44 3.8 100.0 100.0 . 1104 96.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 44 Missing cases 1104 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDJB2 Q10(BEFORE) Fundraising, Brown Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 9 .8 100.0 100.0 . 1139 99.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 9 Missing cases 1139 ATTJB2 Q10(BEFORE) Meeting/rally, Brown Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 32 2.8 100.0 100.0 . 1116 97.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 32 Missing cases 1116 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SIGNBC2 Q10(BEFORE) Signatures, Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 20 1.7 100.0 100.0 . 1128 98.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 20 Missing cases 1128 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LMONBC2 Q10(BEFORE) Gave 100 or less, Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 160 13.9 100.0 100.0 . 988 86.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 160 Missing cases 988 HMONBC2 Q10(BEFORE) Gave > $100, Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 53 4.6 100.0 100.0 . 1095 95.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 53 Missing cases 1095 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVBC2 Q10(BEFORE) Canvassing, Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 64 5.6 100.0 100.0 . 1084 94.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 64 Missing cases 1084 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVBC2 Q10(BEFORE) Convince friends, Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 301 26.2 100.0 100.0 . 847 73.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 301 Missing cases 847 FUNDBC2 Q10(BEFORE) Fundraising, Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 104 9.1 100.0 100.0 . 1044 90.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 104 Missing cases 1044 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTBC2 Q10(BEFORE) Meeting/rally, Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 258 22.5 100.0 100.0 . 890 77.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 258 Missing cases 890 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SIGNBK2 Q10(BEFORE) Signatures, Kerry Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 1 .1 100.0 100.0 . 1147 99.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1 Missing cases 1147 LMONBK2 Q10(BEFORE) Gave 100 or less, Kerry Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 7 .6 100.0 100.0 . 1141 99.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 7 Missing cases 1141 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HMONBK2 Q10(BEFORE) Gave > $100, Kerry Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 1 .1 100.0 100.0 . 1147 99.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1 Missing cases 1147 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVBK2 Q10(BEFORE) Canvassing, Kerry Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 4 .3 100.0 100.0 . 1144 99.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4 Missing cases 1144 CONVBK2 Q10(BEFORE) Convince friends, Kerry Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 15 1.3 100.0 100.0 . 1133 98.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 15 Missing cases 1133 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDBK2 Q10(BEFORE) Fundraising, Kerry Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 4 .3 100.0 100.0 . 1144 99.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4 Missing cases 1144 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTBK2 Q10(BEFORE) Meeting/rally, Kerry Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 10 .9 100.0 100.0 . 1138 99.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 10 Missing cases 1138 SIGNPT2 Q10(BEFORE) Signatures, Tsongas Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 2 .2 100.0 100.0 . 1146 99.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2 Missing cases 1146 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LMONPT2 Q10(BEFORE) Gave 100 or less, Tsongas Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 13 1.1 100.0 100.0 . 1135 98.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 13 Missing cases 1135 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HMONPT2 Q10(BEFORE) Gave > $100, Tsongas Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 3 .3 100.0 100.0 . 1145 99.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 3 Missing cases 1145 CANVPT2 Q10(BEFORE) Canvassing, Tsongas Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 2 .2 100.0 100.0 . 1146 99.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2 Missing cases 1146 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVPT2 Q10(BEFORE) Convince friends, Tsongas Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 51 4.4 100.0 100.0 . 1097 95.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 51 Missing cases 1097 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDPT2 Q10(BEFORE) Fundraising, Tsongas Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 7 .6 100.0 100.0 . 1141 99.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 7 Missing cases 1141 ATTPT2 Q10(BEFORE) Meeting/rally, Tsongas Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 25 2.2 100.0 100.0 . 1123 97.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 25 Missing cases 1123 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SIGNTH2 Q10(BEFORE) Signatures, Harkin Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 28 2.4 100.0 100.0 . 1120 97.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 28 Missing cases 1120 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LMONTH2 Q10(BEFORE) Gave 100 or less, Harkin Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 103 9.0 100.0 100.0 . 1045 91.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 103 Missing cases 1045 HMONTH2 Q10(BEFORE) Gave > $100, Harkin Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 37 3.2 100.0 100.0 . 1111 96.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 37 Missing cases 1111 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVTH2 Q10(BEFORE) Canvassing, Harkin Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 35 3.0 100.0 100.0 . 1113 97.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 35 Missing cases 1113 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVTH2 Q10(BEFORE) Convince friends, Harkin Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 115 10.0 100.0 100.0 . 1033 90.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 115 Missing cases 1033 FUNDTH2 Q10(BEFORE) Fundraising, Harkin Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 74 6.4 100.0 100.0 . 1074 93.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 74 Missing cases 1074 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTTH2 Q10(BEFORE) Meeting/rally, Harkin Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 150 13.1 100.0 100.0 . 998 86.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 150 Missing cases 998 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SIGNGB2 Q10(BEFORE) Signatures, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 30 2.6 100.0 100.0 . 1118 97.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 30 Missing cases 1118 LMONGB2 Q10(BEFORE) Gave 100 or less, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 126 11.0 100.0 100.0 . 1022 89.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 126 Missing cases 1022 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HMONGB2 Q10(BEFORE) Gave > $100, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 23 2.0 100.0 100.0 . 1125 98.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 23 Missing cases 1125 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVGB2 Q10(BEFORE) Canvassing, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 50 4.4 100.0 100.0 . 1098 95.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 50 Missing cases 1098 CONVGB2 Q10(BEFORE) Convince friends, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 230 20.0 100.0 100.0 . 918 80.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 230 Missing cases 918 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDGB2 Q10(BEFORE) Fundraising, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 69 6.0 100.0 100.0 . 1079 94.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 69 Missing cases 1079 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTGB2 Q10(BEFORE) Meeting/rally, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 206 17.9 100.0 100.0 . 942 82.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 206 Missing cases 942 SIGNPB2 Q10(BEFORE) Signatures, Buchanan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 5 .4 100.0 100.0 . 1143 99.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 5 Missing cases 1143 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LMONPB2 Q10(BEFORE) Gave 100 or less, Buchanan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 7 .6 100.0 100.0 . 1141 99.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 7 Missing cases 1141 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HMONPB2 Q10(BEFORE) Gave > $100, Buchanan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 1 .1 100.0 100.0 . 1147 99.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1 Missing cases 1147 CANVPB2 Q10(BEFORE) Canvassing, Buchanan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 1 .1 100.0 100.0 . 1147 99.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1 Missing cases 1147 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVPB2 Q10(BEFORE) Convince friends, Buchanan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 12 1.0 100.0 100.0 . 1136 99.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 12 Missing cases 1136 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDPB2 Q10(BEFORE) Fundraising, Buchanan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 1 .1 100.0 100.0 . 1147 99.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1 Missing cases 1147 ATTPB2 Q10(BEFORE) Meeting/rally, Buchanan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 13 1.1 100.0 100.0 . 1135 98.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 13 Missing cases 1135 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SIGNRP2 Q10(BEFORE) Signatures, Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 8 .7 100.0 100.0 . 1140 99.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 8 Missing cases 1140 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LMONRP2 Q10(BEFORE) Gave 100 or less, Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 4 .3 100.0 100.0 . 1144 99.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4 Missing cases 1144 HMONRP2 Q10(BEFORE) Gave > $100, Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent . 1148 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 1148 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVRP2 Q10(BEFORE) Canvassing, Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 3 .3 100.0 100.0 . 1145 99.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 3 Missing cases 1145 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVRP2 Q10(BEFORE) Convince friends, Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 38 3.3 100.0 100.0 . 1110 96.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 38 Missing cases 1110 FUNDRP2 Q10(BEFORE) Fundraising, Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 2 .2 100.0 100.0 . 1146 99.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2 Missing cases 1146 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTRP2 Q10(BEFORE) Meeting/rally, Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 16 1.4 100.0 100.0 . 1132 98.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 16 Missing cases 1132 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SIGNBQ2 Q11(AFTER) Signatures, Bush/Quayle Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 14 1.2 100.0 100.0 . 1134 98.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 14 Missing cases 1134 LMONBQ2 Q11(AFTER) Gave $100 or less, Bush/Quayl Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 84 7.3 100.0 100.0 . 1064 92.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 84 Missing cases 1064 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HMONBQ2 Q11(AFTER) Gave > $100, Bush/Quayle Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 12 1.0 100.0 100.0 . 1136 99.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 12 Missing cases 1136 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVBQ2 Q11(AFTER) Canvassing, Bush/Quayle Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 62 5.4 100.0 100.0 . 1086 94.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 62 Missing cases 1086 CONVBQ2 Q11(AFTER) Convince friends, Bush/Quayle Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 227 19.8 100.0 100.0 . 921 80.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 227 Missing cases 921 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDBQ2 Q11(AFTER) Fundraising, Bush/Quayle Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 54 4.7 100.0 100.0 . 1094 95.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 54 Missing cases 1094 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTBQ2 Q11(AFTER) Meeting/rally, Bush/Quayle Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 159 13.9 100.0 100.0 . 989 86.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 159 Missing cases 989 SIGNCG2 Q11(AFTER) Signatures, Clinton/Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 14 1.2 100.0 100.0 . 1134 98.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 14 Missing cases 1134 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LMONCG2 Q11(AFTER) Gave $100 or less, Clinton/Go Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 227 19.8 100.0 100.0 . 921 80.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 227 Missing cases 921 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HMONCG2 Q11(AFTER) Gave > $100, Clinton/Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 83 7.2 100.0 100.0 . 1065 92.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 83 Missing cases 1065 CANVCG2 Q11(AFTER) Canvassing, Clinton/Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 126 11.0 100.0 100.0 . 1022 89.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 126 Missing cases 1022 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVCG2 Q11(AFTER) Convince friends, Clinton/Gor Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 438 38.2 100.0 100.0 . 710 61.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 438 Missing cases 710 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDCG2 Q11(AFTER) Fundraising, Clinton/Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 165 14.4 100.0 100.0 . 983 85.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 165 Missing cases 983 ATTCG2 Q11(AFTER) Meeting/rally, Clinton/Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 334 29.1 100.0 100.0 . 814 70.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 334 Missing cases 814 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SIGNPS2 Q11(AFTER) Signatures, Perot/Stockdale Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 5 .4 100.0 100.0 . 1143 99.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 5 Missing cases 1143 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LMONPS2 Q11(AFTER) Gave $100 or less, Perot/Stoc Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 4 .3 100.0 100.0 . 1144 99.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4 Missing cases 1144 HMONPS2 Q11(AFTER) Gave > $100, Perot/Stockdale Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 2 .2 100.0 100.0 . 1146 99.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2 Missing cases 1146 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVPS2 Q11(AFTER) Canvassing, Perot/Stockdale Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 6 .5 100.0 100.0 . 1142 99.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 6 Missing cases 1142 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVPS2 Q11(AFTER) Convince friends, Perot/Stock Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 32 2.8 100.0 100.0 . 1116 97.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 32 Missing cases 1116 FUNDPS2 Q11(AFTER) Fundraising, Perot/Stockdale Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 8 .7 100.0 100.0 . 1140 99.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 8 Missing cases 1140 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTPS2 Q11(AFTER) Meeting/rally, Perot/Stockdal Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 15 1.3 100.0 100.0 . 1133 98.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 15 Missing cases 1133 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SIGNDH2 Q11(AFTER) Signatures, D Hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 12 1.0 100.0 100.0 . 1136 99.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 12 Missing cases 1136 LMONDH2 Q11(AFTER) Gave $100 or less, D Hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 75 6.5 100.0 100.0 . 1073 93.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 75 Missing cases 1073 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HMONDH2 Q11(AFTER) Gave > $100, D Hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 20 1.7 100.0 100.0 . 1128 98.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 20 Missing cases 1128 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVDH2 Q11(AFTER) Canvassing, D Hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 44 3.8 100.0 100.0 . 1104 96.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 44 Missing cases 1104 CONVDH2 Q11(AFTER) Convince friends, D Hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 125 10.9 100.0 100.0 . 1023 89.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 125 Missing cases 1023 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDDH2 Q11(AFTER) Fundraising, D Hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 63 5.5 100.0 100.0 . 1085 94.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 63 Missing cases 1085 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTDH2 Q11(AFTER) Meeting/rally, D Hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 110 9.6 100.0 100.0 . 1038 90.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 110 Missing cases 1038 SIGNRH2 Q11(AFTER) Signatures, R Hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 23 2.0 100.0 100.0 . 1125 98.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 23 Missing cases 1125 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LMONRH2 Q11(AFTER) Gave $100 or less, R Hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 62 5.4 100.0 100.0 . 1086 94.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 62 Missing cases 1086 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HMONRH2 Q11(AFTER) Gave > $100, R Hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 11 1.0 100.0 100.0 . 1137 99.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 11 Missing cases 1137 CANVRH2 Q11(AFTER) Canvassing, R Hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 27 2.4 100.0 100.0 . 1121 97.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 27 Missing cases 1121 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVRH2 Q11(AFTER) Convince friends, R Hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 110 9.6 100.0 100.0 . 1038 90.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 110 Missing cases 1038 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDRH2 Q11(AFTER) Fundraising, R Hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 42 3.7 100.0 100.0 . 1106 96.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 42 Missing cases 1106 ATTRH2 Q11(AFTER) Meeting/rally, R Hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 83 7.2 100.0 100.0 . 1065 92.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 83 Missing cases 1065 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SIGNDS2 Q11(AFTER) Signatures, D state cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 22 1.9 100.0 100.0 . 1126 98.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 22 Missing cases 1126 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LMONDS2 Q11(AFTER) Gave $100 or less, D state ca Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 100 8.7 100.0 100.0 . 1048 91.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 100 Missing cases 1048 HMONDS2 Q11(AFTER) Gave > $100, D state cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 24 2.1 100.0 100.0 . 1124 97.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 24 Missing cases 1124 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVDS2 Q11(AFTER) Canvassing, D state cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 58 5.1 100.0 100.0 . 1090 94.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 58 Missing cases 1090 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVDS2 Q11(AFTER) Convince friends, D state can Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 134 11.7 100.0 100.0 . 1014 88.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 134 Missing cases 1014 FUNDDS2 Q11(AFTER) Fundraising, D state cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 79 6.9 100.0 100.0 . 1069 93.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 79 Missing cases 1069 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTDS2 Q11(AFTER) Meeting/rally, D state cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 128 11.1 100.0 100.0 . 1020 88.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 128 Missing cases 1020 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SIGNRS2 Q11(AFTER) Signatures, R state cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 39 3.4 100.0 100.0 . 1109 96.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 39 Missing cases 1109 LMONRS2 Q11(AFTER) Gave $100 or less, R state ca Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 81 7.1 100.0 100.0 . 1067 92.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 81 Missing cases 1067 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HMONRS2 Q11(AFTER) Gave > $100, R state cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 29 2.5 100.0 100.0 . 1119 97.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 29 Missing cases 1119 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVRS2 Q11(AFTER) Canvassing, R state cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 57 5.0 100.0 100.0 . 1091 95.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 57 Missing cases 1091 CONVRS2 Q11(AFTER) Convince friends, R state can Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 141 12.3 100.0 100.0 . 1007 87.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 141 Missing cases 1007 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FUNDRS2 Q11(AFTER) Fundraising, R state cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 64 5.6 100.0 100.0 . 1084 94.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 64 Missing cases 1084 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ATTRS2 Q11(AFTER) Meeting/rally, R state cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 115 10.0 100.0 100.0 . 1033 90.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 115 Missing cases 1033 CAMPPRD2 Q12 Active in Dem presidential campaigns Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent very active 1 134 11.7 16.9 16.9 fairly active 2 250 21.8 31.5 48.4 not very active 3 233 20.3 29.3 77.7 not active at all 4 177 15.4 22.3 100.0 . 354 30.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 794 Missing cases 354 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CMSEND2 Q12 Active in Dem Senate campaigns Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent very active 1 96 8.4 13.0 13.0 fairly active 2 201 17.5 27.3 40.4 not very active 3 200 17.4 27.2 67.5 not active at all 4 239 20.8 32.5 100.0 . 412 35.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 736 Missing cases 412 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CMHSED2 Q12 Active in Dem House campaigns Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent very active 1 126 11.0 16.8 16.8 fairly active 2 195 17.0 26.0 42.8 not very active 3 215 18.7 28.7 71.5 not active at all 4 214 18.6 28.5 100.0 . 398 34.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 750 Missing cases 398 CMGOVD2 Q12 Active in Dem Gov campaigns Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent very active 1 117 10.2 16.2 16.2 fairly active 2 168 14.6 23.3 39.5 not very active 3 176 15.3 24.4 63.9 not active at all 4 260 22.6 36.1 100.0 . 427 37.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 721 Missing cases 427 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CMSTD2 Q12 Active in Dem state campaigns Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent very active 1 120 10.5 16.7 16.7 fairly active 2 163 14.2 22.6 39.3 not very active 3 184 16.0 25.6 64.9 not active at all 4 253 22.0 35.1 100.0 . 428 37.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 720 Missing cases 428 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CMLOCD2 Q12 Active in Dem local campaigns Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent very active 1 161 14.0 21.6 21.6 fairly active 2 176 15.3 23.6 45.2 not very active 3 180 15.7 24.1 69.3 not active at all 4 229 19.9 30.7 100.0 . 402 35.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 746 Missing cases 402 CAMPPRR2 Q12 Active in Rep presidential campaigns Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent very active 1 48 4.2 8.7 8.7 fairly active 2 160 13.9 29.1 37.9 not very active 3 108 9.4 19.7 57.6 not active at all 4 233 20.3 42.4 100.0 . 599 52.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 549 Missing cases 599 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CMSENR2 Q12 Active in Rep Senate campaigns Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent very active 1 53 4.6 10.2 10.2 fairly active 2 135 11.8 25.9 36.1 not very active 3 99 8.6 19.0 55.1 not active at all 4 234 20.4 44.9 100.0 . 627 54.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 521 Missing cases 627 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CMHSE2 Q12 Active in Rep House campaigns Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent very active 1 55 4.8 10.7 10.7 fairly active 2 133 11.6 26.0 36.7 not very active 3 92 8.0 18.0 54.7 not active at all 4 232 20.2 45.3 100.0 . 636 55.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 512 Missing cases 636 CMGOVR2 Q12 Active in Rep Gov campaigns Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent very active 1 42 3.7 8.4 8.4 fairly active 2 110 9.6 21.9 30.3 not very active 3 105 9.1 20.9 51.2 not active at all 4 245 21.3 48.8 100.0 . 646 56.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 502 Missing cases 646 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CMSTR2 Q12 Active in Rep state campaigns Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent very active 1 57 5.0 11.3 11.3 fairly active 2 101 8.8 20.0 31.3 not very active 3 111 9.7 22.0 53.4 not active at all 4 235 20.5 46.6 100.0 . 644 56.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 504 Missing cases 644 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CMLOCR2 Q12 Active in Rep local campaigns Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent very active 1 60 5.2 11.9 11.9 fairly active 2 108 9.4 21.4 33.3 not very active 3 103 9.0 20.4 53.8 not active at all 4 233 20.3 46.2 100.0 . 644 56.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 504 Missing cases 644 MEMBD2 Q13 Member local Dem party committee Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent currently hold 1 176 15.3 52.2 52.2 formerly held 2 161 14.0 47.8 100.0 . 811 70.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 337 Missing cases 811 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CHAIRD2 Q13 Chair local Dem party committee Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent currently hold 1 30 2.6 35.3 35.3 formerly held 2 55 4.8 64.7 100.0 . 1063 92.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 85 Missing cases 1063 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LOCALD2 Q13 Elected local office, Dem Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent currently hold 1 23 2.0 47.9 47.9 formerly held 2 25 2.2 52.1 100.0 . 1100 95.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 48 Missing cases 1100 STNATD2 Q13 Elected state/natl office, Dem Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent currently hold 1 2 .2 25.0 25.0 formerly held 2 6 .5 75.0 100.0 . 1140 99.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 8 Missing cases 1140 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - APPTD2 Q13 Appointed govt/pol office, Dem Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent currently hold 1 21 1.8 45.7 45.7 formerly held 2 25 2.2 54.3 100.0 . 1102 96.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 46 Missing cases 1102 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PAIDSTD2 Q13 Paid position, Dem Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent currently hold 1 3 .3 9.1 9.1 formerly held 2 30 2.6 90.9 100.0 . 1115 97.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 33 Missing cases 1115 DELSTD2 Q13 Delegate to Dem state convention Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent currently hold 1 85 7.4 31.0 31.0 formerly held 2 189 16.5 69.0 100.0 . 874 76.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 274 Missing cases 874 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MEMBR2 Q13 Member local Rep party committee Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent currently hold 1 89 7.8 43.0 43.0 formerly held 2 118 10.3 57.0 100.0 . 941 82.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 207 Missing cases 941 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CHAIRR2 Q13 Chair local Rep party committee Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent currently hold 1 10 .9 19.2 19.2 formerly held 2 42 3.7 80.8 100.0 . 1096 95.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 52 Missing cases 1096 LOCALR2 Q13 Elected local office, Rep Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent currently hold 1 17 1.5 51.5 51.5 formerly held 2 16 1.4 48.5 100.0 . 1115 97.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 33 Missing cases 1115 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - STNATR2 Q13 Elected state/natl office, Rep Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent currently hold 1 1 .1 14.3 14.3 formerly held 2 6 .5 85.7 100.0 . 1141 99.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 7 Missing cases 1141 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - APPTR2 Q13 Appointed govt/pol office, Rep Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent currently hold 1 5 .4 25.0 25.0 formerly held 2 15 1.3 75.0 100.0 . 1128 98.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 20 Missing cases 1128 PAIDSTR2 Q13 Paid position, Rep Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent formerly held 2 11 1.0 100.0 100.0 . 1137 99.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 11 Missing cases 1137 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DELSTR2 Q13 Delegate to Rep state convention Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent currently hold 1 45 3.9 27.6 27.6 formerly held 2 118 10.3 72.4 100.0 . 985 85.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 163 Missing cases 985 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FSTPR2 Q14a First active in pres campaign Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 490 42.7 100.0 100.0 . 658 57.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 490 Missing cases 658 FSTGUB2 Q14a First active in gub campaign Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 67 5.8 100.0 100.0 . 1081 94.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 67 Missing cases 1081 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FSTSEN2 Q14a First active in Sen campaign Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 99 8.6 100.0 100.0 . 1049 91.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 99 Missing cases 1049 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FSTHR2 Q14a First active in House campaign Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 123 10.7 100.0 100.0 . 1025 89.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 123 Missing cases 1025 FSTST2 Q14a First active in state leg campaign Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 120 10.5 100.0 100.0 . 1028 89.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 120 Missing cases 1028 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FSTLOC2 Q14a First active in local campaign Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 264 23.0 100.0 100.0 . 884 77.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 264 Missing cases 884 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FSTDK2 Q14a Cannot recall first activity Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 108 9.4 100.0 100.0 . 1040 90.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 108 Missing cases 1040 FST92 Q14b Was 1992 first year active Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 86 7.5 7.9 7.9 no 2 1000 87.1 92.1 100.0 . 62 5.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1086 Missing cases 62 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CAM922 Q15 Involved in pres generl election Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 648 56.4 59.7 59.7 no 2 438 38.2 40.3 100.0 . 62 5.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1086 Missing cases 62 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TRUST2 Q16 Trust government in DC to do right Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent always 1 4 .3 .4 .4 most of the time 2 300 26.1 26.6 27.0 only some of the tim 3 677 59.0 60.1 87.1 never 4 145 12.6 12.9 100.0 . 22 1.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1126 Missing cases 22 GOVRUN2 Q17 In general, government is Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent run by a few 1 793 69.1 75.3 75.3 run for the all peop 2 260 22.6 24.7 100.0 . 95 8.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1053 Missing cases 95 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABORT2 Q18a Opinion - abortion amendment Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 215 18.7 20.3 20.3 favor 2 76 6.6 7.2 27.5 slightly favor 3 30 2.6 2.8 30.3 slightly oppose 5 34 3.0 3.2 33.5 oppose 6 120 10.5 11.3 44.8 strongly oppose 7 585 51.0 55.2 100.0 . 31 2.7 Missing not sure 4 57 5.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1060 Missing cases 88 AFFACT2 Q18a Opinion - affirmative action Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 131 11.4 13.8 13.8 favor 2 230 20.0 24.2 38.0 slightly favor 3 214 18.6 22.5 60.5 slightly oppose 5 94 8.2 9.9 70.4 oppose 6 140 12.2 14.7 85.2 strongly oppose 7 141 12.3 14.8 100.0 . 41 3.6 Missing not sure 4 157 13.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 950 Missing cases 198 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BALBUD2 Q18a Opinion - balanced budget amendment Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 355 30.9 34.9 34.9 favor 2 218 19.0 21.4 56.3 slightly favor 3 106 9.2 10.4 66.7 slightly oppose 5 58 5.1 5.7 72.4 oppose 6 136 11.8 13.4 85.8 strongly oppose 7 145 12.6 14.2 100.0 . 26 2.3 Missing not sure 4 104 9.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1018 Missing cases 130 IMPORT2 Q18a Opinion - limits on foreign imports Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 215 18.7 22.4 22.4 favor 2 176 15.3 18.3 40.7 slightly favor 3 171 14.9 17.8 58.5 slightly oppose 5 122 10.6 12.7 71.2 oppose 6 182 15.9 18.9 90.1 strongly oppose 7 95 8.3 9.9 100.0 . 30 2.6 Missing not sure 4 157 13.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 961 Missing cases 187 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NHI2 Q18a Opinion - national health insurance Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 390 34.0 38.3 38.3 favor 2 218 19.0 21.4 59.7 slightly favor 3 123 10.7 12.1 71.7 slightly oppose 5 42 3.7 4.1 75.9 oppose 6 95 8.3 9.3 85.2 strongly oppose 7 151 13.2 14.8 100.0 . 19 1.7 Missing not sure 4 110 9.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1019 Missing cases 129 POLLUT2 Q18a Opinion - gov regulate pollution Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 314 27.4 30.0 30.0 favor 2 299 26.0 28.6 58.6 slightly favor 3 170 14.8 16.3 74.9 slightly oppose 5 69 6.0 6.6 81.5 oppose 6 110 9.6 10.5 92.0 strongly oppose 7 84 7.3 8.0 100.0 . 27 2.4 Missing not sure 4 75 6.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1046 Missing cases 102 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - USFOR2 Q18a Opinion - decreased US involvement Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 130 11.3 13.0 13.0 favor 2 194 16.9 19.4 32.4 slightly favor 3 272 23.7 27.2 59.7 slightly oppose 5 161 14.0 16.1 75.8 oppose 6 181 15.8 18.1 93.9 strongly oppose 7 61 5.3 6.1 100.0 . 23 2.0 Missing not sure 4 126 11.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 999 Missing cases 149 TERMLIM2 Q18a Opinion - term limits Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 336 29.3 32.3 32.3 favor 2 194 16.9 18.7 51.0 slightly favor 3 118 10.3 11.3 62.3 slightly oppose 5 66 5.7 6.3 68.7 oppose 6 146 12.7 14.0 82.7 strongly oppose 7 180 15.7 17.3 100.0 . 18 1.6 Missing not sure 4 90 7.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1040 Missing cases 108 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GASTAX2 Q18a Opinion - Federal gas tax Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 149 13.0 14.6 14.6 favor 2 186 16.2 18.3 32.9 slightly favor 3 177 15.4 17.4 50.3 slightly oppose 5 94 8.2 9.2 59.5 oppose 6 184 16.0 18.1 77.6 strongly oppose 7 228 19.9 22.4 100.0 . 28 2.4 Missing not sure 4 102 8.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1018 Missing cases 130 SOCSEC2 Q18a Opinion - increase soc sec tax Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 325 28.3 31.0 31.0 favor 2 332 28.9 31.7 62.8 slightly favor 3 151 13.2 14.4 77.2 slightly oppose 5 50 4.4 4.8 81.9 oppose 6 80 7.0 7.6 89.6 strongly oppose 7 109 9.5 10.4 100.0 . 26 2.3 Missing not sure 4 75 6.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1047 Missing cases 101 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HOMO2 Q18a Opinion - homosexuals in military Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 203 17.7 20.2 20.2 favor 2 268 23.3 26.6 46.8 slightly favor 3 85 7.4 8.4 55.3 slightly oppose 5 49 4.3 4.9 60.1 oppose 6 97 8.4 9.6 69.8 strongly oppose 7 304 26.5 30.2 100.0 . 28 2.4 Missing not sure 4 114 9.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1006 Missing cases 142 DEATH2 Q18a Opinion - eliminate death penalty Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 188 16.4 19.1 19.1 favor 2 113 9.8 11.5 30.5 slightly favor 3 51 4.4 5.2 35.7 slightly oppose 5 71 6.2 7.2 42.9 oppose 6 197 17.2 20.0 62.9 strongly oppose 7 366 31.9 37.1 100.0 . 27 2.4 Missing not sure 4 135 11.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 986 Missing cases 162 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MIISS2 Q18b Issue most important to you Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ABORTION 1 219 19.1 21.3 21.3 AFFIRMATIVE ACTION 2 24 2.1 2.3 23.7 BALANCED BUDGET 3 186 16.2 18.1 41.8 IMPORTS 4 44 3.8 4.3 46.1 NATL HEALTH INS 5 311 27.1 30.3 76.4 POLLUTION 6 68 5.9 6.6 83.0 ISOLATIONISM 7 28 2.4 2.7 85.8 TERM LIMITS 8 44 3.8 4.3 90.1 GAS TAX 9 16 1.4 1.6 91.6 SOCIAL SECURITY TAX 10 24 2.1 2.3 94.0 HOMOSEXUALS 11 33 2.9 3.2 97.2 DEATH PENALTY 12 29 2.5 2.8 100.0 . 51 4.4 Missing NOT SURE 13 71 6.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1026 Missing cases 122 LCGB2 Q19 Political philosophy, George Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent extremely lib 1 5 .4 .5 .5 lib 2 12 1.0 1.2 1.6 slightly lib 3 21 1.8 2.0 3.7 middle-of-the road 4 91 7.9 8.8 12.5 slightly conservativ 5 204 17.8 19.7 32.2 conservative 6 561 48.9 54.3 86.5 extremely cons 7 139 12.1 13.5 100.0 . 74 6.4 Missing not sure 8 41 3.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1033 Missing cases 115 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCBC2 Q19 Political philosophy, Bill Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent extremely lib 1 193 16.8 18.3 18.3 lib 2 361 31.4 34.3 52.6 slightly lib 3 298 26.0 28.3 80.9 middle-of-the road 4 157 13.7 14.9 95.8 slightly conservativ 5 32 2.8 3.0 98.9 conservative 6 10 .9 .9 99.8 extremely cons 7 2 .2 .2 100.0 . 70 6.1 Missing not sure 8 25 2.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1053 Missing cases 95 LCHRP2 Q19 Political philosophy, H Ross Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent extremely lib 1 22 1.9 2.6 2.6 lib 2 53 4.6 6.2 8.8 slightly lib 3 83 7.2 9.7 18.5 middle-of-the road 4 170 14.8 19.9 38.4 slightly conservativ 5 179 15.6 20.9 59.3 conservative 6 220 19.2 25.7 85.0 extremely cons 7 128 11.1 15.0 100.0 . 93 8.1 Missing not sure 8 200 17.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 855 Missing cases 293 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCAG2 Q19 Political philosophy, Al Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent extremely lib 1 231 20.1 23.0 23.0 lib 2 368 32.1 36.6 59.5 slightly lib 3 235 20.5 23.4 82.9 middle-of-the road 4 119 10.4 11.8 94.7 slightly conservativ 5 28 2.4 2.8 97.5 conservative 6 20 1.7 2.0 99.5 extremely cons 7 5 .4 .5 100.0 . 93 8.1 Missing not sure 8 49 4.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1006 Missing cases 142 LCDQ2 Q19 Political philosophy, Dan Quayle Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent extremely lib 1 3 .3 .3 .3 lib 2 13 1.1 1.3 1.7 slightly lib 3 7 .6 .7 2.4 middle-of-the road 4 25 2.2 2.6 5.0 slightly conservativ 5 46 4.0 4.8 9.7 conservative 6 344 30.0 35.6 45.4 extremely cons 7 527 45.9 54.6 100.0 . 100 8.7 Missing not sure 8 83 7.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 965 Missing cases 183 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCJS Q19 Political philosophy, James Stockdal Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent extremely lib 1 5 .4 1.2 1.2 lib 2 24 2.1 5.6 6.7 slightly lib 3 15 1.3 3.5 10.2 middle-of-the road 4 75 6.5 17.4 27.7 slightly conservativ 5 43 3.7 10.0 37.7 conservative 6 139 12.1 32.3 70.0 extremely cons 7 129 11.2 30.0 100.0 . 171 14.9 Missing not sure 8 547 47.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 430 Missing cases 718 LCPB2 Q19 Political philosophy, Pat Buchanan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent extremely lib 1 5 .4 .6 .6 lib 2 10 .9 1.1 1.7 slightly lib 3 3 .3 .3 2.0 middle-of-the road 4 14 1.2 1.6 3.6 slightly conservativ 5 11 1.0 1.2 4.8 conservative 6 90 7.8 10.1 14.9 extremely cons 7 760 66.2 85.1 100.0 . 143 12.5 Missing not sure 8 112 9.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 893 Missing cases 255 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCJJ2 Q19 Political philosophy, Jesse Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent extremely lib 1 624 54.4 64.1 64.1 lib 2 246 21.4 25.3 89.3 slightly lib 3 39 3.4 4.0 93.3 middle-of-the road 4 41 3.6 4.2 97.5 slightly conservativ 5 4 .3 .4 97.9 conservative 6 15 1.3 1.5 99.5 extremely cons 7 5 .4 .5 100.0 . 122 10.6 Missing not sure 8 52 4.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 974 Missing cases 174 LCRR2 Q19 Political philosophy, Ronald Reagan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent extremely lib 1 17 1.5 1.7 1.7 lib 2 9 .8 .9 2.6 slightly lib 3 5 .4 .5 3.1 middle-of-the road 4 32 2.8 3.2 6.4 slightly conservativ 5 62 5.4 6.3 12.7 conservative 6 407 35.5 41.3 54.0 extremely cons 7 453 39.5 46.0 100.0 . 106 9.2 Missing not sure 8 57 5.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 985 Missing cases 163 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCAVAM2 Q19 Political philosophy, Avg voter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent extremely lib 1 2 .2 .2 .2 lib 2 26 2.3 2.6 2.8 slightly lib 3 127 11.1 12.8 15.6 middle-of-the road 4 415 36.1 41.8 57.3 slightly conservativ 5 330 28.7 33.2 90.5 conservative 6 83 7.2 8.4 98.9 extremely cons 7 11 1.0 1.1 100.0 . 102 8.9 Missing not sure 8 52 4.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 994 Missing cases 154 LCAVHRP2 Q19 Political philosophy, Avg Perot supp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent extremely lib 1 12 1.0 1.4 1.4 lib 2 31 2.7 3.5 4.9 slightly lib 3 72 6.3 8.2 13.1 middle-of-the road 4 177 15.4 20.2 33.3 slightly conservativ 5 272 23.7 31.0 64.2 conservative 6 245 21.3 27.9 92.1 extremely cons 7 69 6.0 7.9 100.0 . 125 10.9 Missing not sure 8 145 12.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 878 Missing cases 270 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCDP2 Q19 Political philosophy, D Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent extremely lib 1 146 12.7 14.2 14.2 lib 2 410 35.7 40.0 54.2 slightly lib 3 339 29.5 33.1 87.3 middle-of-the road 4 97 8.4 9.5 96.8 slightly conservativ 5 18 1.6 1.8 98.5 conservative 6 11 1.0 1.1 99.6 extremely cons 7 4 .3 .4 100.0 . 108 9.4 Missing not sure 8 15 1.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1025 Missing cases 123 LCRP2 Q19 Political philosophy, R Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent extremely lib 1 8 .7 .8 .8 lib 2 15 1.3 1.5 2.3 slightly lib 3 11 1.0 1.1 3.4 middle-of-the road 4 36 3.1 3.6 7.0 slightly conservativ 5 196 17.1 19.5 26.4 conservative 6 513 44.7 50.9 77.4 extremely cons 7 228 19.9 22.6 100.0 . 113 9.8 Missing not sure 8 28 2.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1007 Missing cases 141 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCDH2 Q19 Political philosophy, D Hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent extremely lib 1 120 10.5 14.0 14.0 lib 2 331 28.8 38.7 52.7 slightly lib 3 209 18.2 24.4 77.1 middle-of-the road 4 128 11.1 15.0 92.1 slightly conservativ 5 39 3.4 4.6 96.6 conservative 6 24 2.1 2.8 99.4 extremely cons 7 5 .4 .6 100.0 . 192 16.7 Missing not sure 8 100 8.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 856 Missing cases 292 LCRH2 Q19 Political philosophy, R Hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent extremely lib 1 7 .6 .8 .8 lib 2 15 1.3 1.7 2.5 slightly lib 3 27 2.4 3.0 5.5 middle-of-the road 4 89 7.8 10.0 15.5 slightly conservativ 5 148 12.9 16.6 32.2 conservative 6 356 31.0 40.0 72.2 extremely cons 7 247 21.5 27.8 100.0 . 152 13.2 Missing not sure 8 107 9.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 889 Missing cases 259 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AFACGB2 Q20 Affirm action, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 7 .6 .8 .8 favor 2 61 5.3 6.8 7.5 slightly favor 3 105 9.1 11.6 19.2 slightly oppose 5 159 13.9 17.6 36.8 oppose 6 377 32.8 41.8 78.6 strongly oppose 7 193 16.8 21.4 100.0 . 125 10.9 Missing not sure 4 121 10.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 902 Missing cases 246 AFACBC2 Q20 Affirm action, Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 269 23.4 28.8 28.8 favor 2 410 35.7 43.9 72.8 slightly favor 3 223 19.4 23.9 96.7 slightly oppose 5 14 1.2 1.5 98.2 oppose 6 11 1.0 1.2 99.4 strongly oppose 7 6 .5 .6 100.0 . 118 10.3 Missing not sure 4 97 8.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 933 Missing cases 215 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AFACHRP2 Q20 Affirm action, Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 18 1.6 3.3 3.3 favor 2 73 6.4 13.3 16.6 slightly favor 3 120 10.5 21.9 38.5 slightly oppose 5 127 11.1 23.2 61.7 oppose 6 144 12.5 26.3 88.0 strongly oppose 7 66 5.7 12.0 100.0 . 139 12.1 Missing not sure 4 461 40.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 548 Missing cases 600 AFACAM2 Q20 Affirm action, Avg voter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 9 .8 1.2 1.2 favor 2 54 4.7 7.0 8.2 slightly favor 3 197 17.2 25.7 33.9 slightly oppose 5 324 28.2 42.2 76.1 oppose 6 168 14.6 21.9 98.0 strongly oppose 7 15 1.3 2.0 100.0 . 130 11.3 Missing not sure 4 251 21.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 767 Missing cases 381 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AFACDP2 Q20 Affirm action, D Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 204 17.8 21.9 21.9 favor 2 448 39.0 48.1 70.0 slightly favor 3 253 22.0 27.1 97.1 slightly oppose 5 15 1.3 1.6 98.7 oppose 6 10 .9 1.1 99.8 strongly oppose 7 2 .2 .2 100.0 . 128 11.1 Missing not sure 4 88 7.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 932 Missing cases 216 AFACRP2 Q20 Affirm action, R Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 10 .9 1.1 1.1 favor 2 40 3.5 4.4 5.6 slightly favor 3 90 7.8 10.0 15.6 slightly oppose 5 198 17.2 22.0 37.6 oppose 6 398 34.7 44.3 81.9 strongly oppose 7 163 14.2 18.1 100.0 . 133 11.6 Missing not sure 4 116 10.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 899 Missing cases 249 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMPGB2 Q20 Foreign imports, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 14 1.2 1.6 1.6 favor 2 82 7.1 9.2 10.8 slightly favor 3 98 8.5 11.0 21.8 slightly oppose 5 156 13.6 17.5 39.3 oppose 6 337 29.4 37.8 77.1 strongly oppose 7 204 17.8 22.9 100.0 . 132 11.5 Missing not sure 4 125 10.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 891 Missing cases 257 IMPBC2 Q20 Foreign imports, Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 105 9.1 13.0 13.0 favor 2 242 21.1 29.9 42.8 slightly favor 3 271 23.6 33.5 76.3 slightly oppose 5 112 9.8 13.8 90.1 oppose 6 61 5.3 7.5 97.7 strongly oppose 7 19 1.7 2.3 100.0 . 125 10.9 Missing not sure 4 213 18.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 810 Missing cases 338 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMPHRP2 Q20 Foreign imports, Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 130 11.3 19.4 19.4 favor 2 219 19.1 32.6 52.0 slightly favor 3 136 11.8 20.3 72.3 slightly oppose 5 68 5.9 10.1 82.4 oppose 6 76 6.6 11.3 93.7 strongly oppose 7 42 3.7 6.3 100.0 . 151 13.2 Missing not sure 4 326 28.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 671 Missing cases 477 IMPAM2 Q20 Foreign imports, Avg voter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 111 9.7 13.5 13.5 favor 2 286 24.9 34.7 48.2 slightly favor 3 342 29.8 41.5 89.7 slightly oppose 5 53 4.6 6.4 96.1 oppose 6 25 2.2 3.0 99.2 strongly oppose 7 7 .6 .8 100.0 . 140 12.2 Missing not sure 4 184 16.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 824 Missing cases 324 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMPDP2 Q20 Foreign imports, D Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 123 10.7 14.6 14.6 favor 2 318 27.7 37.6 52.2 slightly favor 3 278 24.2 32.9 85.1 slightly oppose 5 70 6.1 8.3 93.4 oppose 6 40 3.5 4.7 98.1 strongly oppose 7 16 1.4 1.9 100.0 . 139 12.1 Missing not sure 4 164 14.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 845 Missing cases 303 IMPRP2 Q20 Foreign imports, R Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 28 2.4 3.4 3.4 favor 2 71 6.2 8.7 12.1 slightly favor 3 98 8.5 12.0 24.1 slightly oppose 5 187 16.3 22.9 46.9 oppose 6 311 27.1 38.0 85.0 strongly oppose 7 123 10.7 15.0 100.0 . 147 12.8 Missing not sure 4 183 15.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 818 Missing cases 330 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NHIGB2 Q20 Natl health ins, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 6 .5 .6 .6 favor 2 18 1.6 1.9 2.5 slightly favor 3 56 4.9 5.8 8.3 slightly oppose 5 104 9.1 10.8 19.0 oppose 6 438 38.2 45.3 64.4 strongly oppose 7 344 30.0 35.6 100.0 . 98 8.5 Missing not sure 4 84 7.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 966 Missing cases 182 NHIBC2 Q20 Natl health ins, Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 631 55.0 61.4 61.4 favor 2 298 26.0 29.0 90.5 slightly favor 3 72 6.3 7.0 97.5 slightly oppose 5 13 1.1 1.3 98.7 oppose 6 11 1.0 1.1 99.8 strongly oppose 7 2 .2 .2 100.0 . 85 7.4 Missing not sure 4 36 3.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1027 Missing cases 121 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NHIHRP2 Q20 Natl health ins, Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 53 4.6 9.4 9.4 favor 2 147 12.8 26.1 35.5 slightly favor 3 152 13.2 27.0 62.4 slightly oppose 5 88 7.7 15.6 78.0 oppose 6 86 7.5 15.2 93.3 strongly oppose 7 38 3.3 6.7 100.0 . 127 11.1 Missing not sure 4 457 39.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 564 Missing cases 584 NHIAM2 Q20 Natl health ins, Avg voter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 127 11.1 14.1 14.1 favor 2 366 31.9 40.6 54.7 slightly favor 3 313 27.3 34.7 89.5 slightly oppose 5 60 5.2 6.7 96.1 oppose 6 29 2.5 3.2 99.3 strongly oppose 7 6 .5 .7 100.0 . 110 9.6 Missing not sure 4 137 11.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 901 Missing cases 247 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NHIDP2 Q20 Natl health ins, D Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 313 27.3 31.8 31.8 favor 2 497 43.3 50.5 82.3 slightly favor 3 156 13.6 15.9 98.2 slightly oppose 5 8 .7 .8 99.0 oppose 6 8 .7 .8 99.8 strongly oppose 7 2 .2 .2 100.0 . 107 9.3 Missing not sure 4 57 5.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 984 Missing cases 164 NHIRP2 Q20 Natl health ins, R Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 7 .6 .8 .8 favor 2 23 2.0 2.5 3.3 slightly favor 3 70 6.1 7.7 11.0 slightly oppose 5 182 15.9 20.0 30.9 oppose 6 388 33.8 42.5 73.5 strongly oppose 7 242 21.1 26.5 100.0 . 117 10.2 Missing not sure 4 119 10.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 912 Missing cases 236 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GASGB2 Q20 Federal gas tax, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 17 1.5 1.9 1.9 favor 2 11 1.0 1.3 3.2 slightly favor 3 26 2.3 3.0 6.2 slightly oppose 5 98 8.5 11.2 17.4 oppose 6 387 33.7 44.4 61.8 strongly oppose 7 333 29.0 38.2 100.0 . 125 10.9 Missing not sure 4 151 13.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 872 Missing cases 276 GASBC2 Q20 Federal gas tax, Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 311 27.1 32.2 32.2 favor 2 410 35.7 42.4 74.6 slightly favor 3 197 17.2 20.4 95.0 slightly oppose 5 29 2.5 3.0 98.0 oppose 6 10 .9 1.0 99.1 strongly oppose 7 9 .8 .9 100.0 . 108 9.4 Missing not sure 4 74 6.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 966 Missing cases 182 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GASHRP2 Q20 Federal gas tax, Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 411 35.8 51.6 51.6 favor 2 212 18.5 26.6 78.3 slightly favor 3 81 7.1 10.2 88.4 slightly oppose 5 30 2.6 3.8 92.2 oppose 6 38 3.3 4.8 97.0 strongly oppose 7 24 2.1 3.0 100.0 . 132 11.5 Missing not sure 4 220 19.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 796 Missing cases 352 GASAM2 Q20 Federal gas tax, Avg voter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 5 .4 .6 .6 favor 2 38 3.3 4.7 5.3 slightly favor 3 187 16.3 22.9 28.2 slightly oppose 5 207 18.0 25.4 53.6 oppose 6 259 22.6 31.7 85.3 strongly oppose 7 120 10.5 14.7 100.0 . 131 11.4 Missing not sure 4 201 17.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 816 Missing cases 332 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GASDP2 Q20 Federal gas tax, D Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 118 10.3 14.4 14.4 favor 2 303 26.4 37.0 51.3 slightly favor 3 291 25.3 35.5 86.8 slightly oppose 5 48 4.2 5.9 92.7 oppose 6 41 3.6 5.0 97.7 strongly oppose 7 19 1.7 2.3 100.0 . 125 10.9 Missing not sure 4 203 17.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 820 Missing cases 328 GASRP2 Q20 Federal gas tax, R Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 17 1.5 2.0 2.0 favor 2 20 1.7 2.4 4.4 slightly favor 3 45 3.9 5.4 9.8 slightly oppose 5 151 13.2 18.0 27.8 oppose 6 373 32.5 44.6 72.4 strongly oppose 7 231 20.1 27.6 100.0 . 136 11.8 Missing not sure 4 175 15.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 837 Missing cases 311 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TERMGB2 Q20 Term limits, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 127 11.1 17.6 17.6 favor 2 176 15.3 24.4 42.0 slightly favor 3 103 9.0 14.3 56.3 slightly oppose 5 52 4.5 7.2 63.5 oppose 6 152 13.2 21.1 84.6 strongly oppose 7 111 9.7 15.4 100.0 . 142 12.4 Missing not sure 4 285 24.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 721 Missing cases 427 TERMBC2 Q20 Term limits, Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 45 3.9 7.2 7.2 favor 2 82 7.1 13.1 20.3 slightly favor 3 90 7.8 14.4 34.7 slightly oppose 5 108 9.4 17.3 51.9 oppose 6 187 16.3 29.9 81.8 strongly oppose 7 114 9.9 18.2 100.0 . 132 11.5 Missing not sure 4 390 34.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 626 Missing cases 522 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TERMHRP2 Q20 Term limits, Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 230 20.0 36.0 36.0 favor 2 258 22.5 40.4 76.4 slightly favor 3 85 7.4 13.3 89.7 slightly oppose 5 22 1.9 3.4 93.1 oppose 6 23 2.0 3.6 96.7 strongly oppose 7 21 1.8 3.3 100.0 . 153 13.3 Missing not sure 4 356 31.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 639 Missing cases 509 TERMAM2 Q20 Term limits, Avg voter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 147 12.8 18.7 18.7 favor 2 316 27.5 40.2 58.9 slightly favor 3 269 23.4 34.2 93.1 slightly oppose 5 28 2.4 3.6 96.7 oppose 6 16 1.4 2.0 98.7 strongly oppose 7 10 .9 1.3 100.0 . 138 12.0 Missing not sure 4 224 19.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 786 Missing cases 362 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TERMDP2 Q20 Term limits, D Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 22 1.9 3.2 3.2 favor 2 74 6.4 10.7 13.8 slightly favor 3 88 7.7 12.7 26.5 slightly oppose 5 112 9.8 16.1 42.7 oppose 6 249 21.7 35.9 78.5 strongly oppose 7 149 13.0 21.5 100.0 . 134 11.7 Missing not sure 4 320 27.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 694 Missing cases 454 TERMRP2 Q20 Term limits, R Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly favor 1 87 7.6 12.4 12.4 favor 2 181 15.8 25.8 38.2 slightly favor 3 124 10.8 17.7 55.9 slightly oppose 5 87 7.6 12.4 68.3 oppose 6 134 11.7 19.1 87.4 strongly oppose 7 88 7.7 12.6 100.0 . 136 11.8 Missing not sure 4 311 27.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 701 Missing cases 447 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ECONGB2 Q21 Able solve econ problems, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 26 2.3 2.4 2.4 above average 2 122 10.6 11.3 13.8 average 3 230 20.0 21.4 35.1 below average 4 208 18.1 19.3 54.5 poor 5 490 42.7 45.5 100.0 . 58 5.1 Missing not sure 6 14 1.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1076 Missing cases 72 ECONBC2 Q21 Able solve econ problems, Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 80 7.0 8.2 8.2 above average 2 391 34.1 39.9 48.1 average 3 222 19.3 22.7 70.7 below average 4 84 7.3 8.6 79.3 poor 5 203 17.7 20.7 100.0 . 51 4.4 Missing not sure 6 117 10.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 980 Missing cases 168 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ECONHRP2 Q21 Able solve econ problems, Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 51 4.4 6.0 6.0 above average 2 302 26.3 35.7 41.7 average 3 237 20.6 28.0 69.7 below average 4 114 9.9 13.5 83.1 poor 5 143 12.5 16.9 100.0 . 82 7.1 Missing not sure 6 219 19.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 847 Missing cases 301 ECONDP2 Q21 Able solve econ problems, D Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 36 3.1 3.7 3.7 above average 2 211 18.4 21.5 25.1 average 3 309 26.9 31.4 56.6 below average 4 145 12.6 14.8 71.3 poor 5 282 24.6 28.7 100.0 . 92 8.0 Missing not sure 6 73 6.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 983 Missing cases 165 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ECONRP2 Q21 Able solve econ problems, R Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 18 1.6 1.8 1.8 above average 2 133 11.6 13.5 15.3 average 3 246 21.4 24.9 40.2 below average 4 228 19.9 23.1 63.3 poor 5 362 31.5 36.7 100.0 . 98 8.5 Missing not sure 6 63 5.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 987 Missing cases 161 CAREGB2 Q21 Cares about people like you, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 51 4.4 4.9 4.9 above average 2 138 12.0 13.1 18.0 average 3 218 19.0 20.8 38.8 below average 4 162 14.1 15.4 54.2 poor 5 481 41.9 45.8 100.0 . 61 5.3 Missing not sure 6 37 3.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1050 Missing cases 98 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CAREBC2 Q21 Cares about people like you, Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 251 21.9 24.3 24.3 above average 2 352 30.7 34.1 58.4 average 3 188 16.4 18.2 76.6 below average 4 80 7.0 7.7 84.3 poor 5 162 14.1 15.7 100.0 . 59 5.1 Missing not sure 6 56 4.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1033 Missing cases 115 CAREHRP2 Q21 Cares about people like you, Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 73 6.4 8.2 8.2 above average 2 256 22.3 28.8 37.0 average 3 283 24.7 31.8 68.8 below average 4 134 11.7 15.1 83.9 poor 5 143 12.5 16.1 100.0 . 82 7.1 Missing not sure 6 177 15.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 889 Missing cases 259 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CAREDP2 Q21 Cares about people like you, D Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 109 9.5 10.8 10.8 above average 2 348 30.3 34.6 45.4 average 3 261 22.7 25.9 71.3 below average 4 109 9.5 10.8 82.1 poor 5 180 15.7 17.9 100.0 . 89 7.8 Missing not sure 6 52 4.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1007 Missing cases 141 CARERP2 Q21 Cares about people like you, R Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 23 2.0 2.3 2.3 above average 2 110 9.6 11.2 13.5 average 3 230 20.0 23.4 36.9 below average 4 228 19.9 23.1 60.0 poor 5 394 34.3 40.0 100.0 . 100 8.7 Missing not sure 6 63 5.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 985 Missing cases 163 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TRSTGB2 Q21 Trustworthy, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 107 9.3 10.1 10.1 above average 2 190 16.6 17.9 28.0 average 3 226 19.7 21.3 49.3 below average 4 162 14.1 15.3 64.6 poor 5 375 32.7 35.4 100.0 . 54 4.7 Missing not sure 6 34 3.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1060 Missing cases 88 TRSTBC2 Q21 Trustworthy, Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 77 6.7 7.6 7.6 above average 2 271 23.6 26.6 34.2 average 3 296 25.8 29.1 63.3 below average 4 109 9.5 10.7 74.0 poor 5 265 23.1 26.0 100.0 . 56 4.9 Missing not sure 6 74 6.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1018 Missing cases 130 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TRSTHRP2 Q21 Trustworthy, Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 48 4.2 5.5 5.5 above average 2 164 14.3 18.8 24.3 average 3 287 25.0 33.0 57.3 below average 4 170 14.8 19.5 76.8 poor 5 202 17.6 23.2 100.0 . 87 7.6 Missing not sure 6 190 16.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 871 Missing cases 277 TRSTDP2 Q21 Trustworthy, D Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 33 2.9 3.3 3.3 above average 2 201 17.5 20.1 23.4 average 3 364 31.7 36.5 59.9 below average 4 148 12.9 14.8 74.7 poor 5 252 22.0 25.3 100.0 . 96 8.4 Missing not sure 6 54 4.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 998 Missing cases 150 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TRSTRP2 Q21 Trustworthy, R Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 21 1.8 2.1 2.1 above average 2 99 8.6 10.1 12.2 average 3 311 27.1 31.7 43.9 below average 4 241 21.0 24.5 68.4 poor 5 310 27.0 31.6 100.0 . 104 9.1 Missing not sure 6 62 5.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 982 Missing cases 166 FORNGB2 Q21 Solve foreign policy problems, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 237 20.6 21.9 21.9 above average 2 393 34.2 36.4 58.3 average 3 272 23.7 25.2 83.5 below average 4 87 7.6 8.1 91.6 poor 5 91 7.9 8.4 100.0 . 50 4.4 Missing not sure 6 18 1.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1080 Missing cases 68 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FORNBC2 Q21 Solve foreign policy problems, Clint Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 14 1.2 1.7 1.7 above average 2 169 14.7 20.2 21.8 average 3 330 28.7 39.4 61.2 below average 4 112 9.8 13.4 74.6 poor 5 213 18.6 25.4 100.0 . 60 5.2 Missing not sure 6 250 21.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 838 Missing cases 310 FORNHRP2 Q21 Solve foreign policy problems, Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 14 1.2 2.0 2.0 above average 2 41 3.6 5.8 7.7 average 3 189 16.5 26.6 34.3 below average 4 199 17.3 28.0 62.3 poor 5 268 23.3 37.7 100.0 . 84 7.3 Missing not sure 6 353 30.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 711 Missing cases 437 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FORNDP2 Q21 Solve foreign policy problems, D Par Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 17 1.5 1.8 1.8 above average 2 142 12.4 15.0 16.8 average 3 447 38.9 47.2 63.9 below average 4 153 13.3 16.1 80.1 poor 5 189 16.5 19.9 100.0 . 87 7.6 Missing not sure 6 113 9.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 948 Missing cases 200 FORNRP2 Q21 Solve foreign policy problems, R Par Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 48 4.2 5.0 5.0 above average 2 243 21.2 25.3 30.3 average 3 427 37.2 44.5 74.8 below average 4 118 10.3 12.3 87.1 poor 5 124 10.8 12.9 100.0 . 95 8.3 Missing not sure 6 93 8.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 960 Missing cases 188 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALGB2 Q21 Overall evaluation, Bush Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 46 4.0 4.3 4.3 above average 2 206 17.9 19.3 23.6 average 3 250 21.8 23.4 47.0 below average 4 204 17.8 19.1 66.1 poor 5 362 31.5 33.9 100.0 . 74 6.4 Missing not sure 6 6 .5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1068 Missing cases 80 EVALBC2 Q21 Overall evaluation, Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 99 8.6 9.9 9.9 above average 2 412 35.9 41.4 51.3 average 3 188 16.4 18.9 70.2 below average 4 92 8.0 9.2 79.4 poor 5 205 17.9 20.6 100.0 . 70 6.1 Missing not sure 6 82 7.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 996 Missing cases 152 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALHRP2 Q21 Overall evaluation, Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 19 1.7 2.2 2.2 above average 2 147 12.8 17.4 19.6 average 3 280 24.4 33.1 52.8 below average 4 176 15.3 20.8 73.6 poor 5 223 19.4 26.4 100.0 . 102 8.9 Missing not sure 6 201 17.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 845 Missing cases 303 EVALAG2 Q21 Overall evaluation, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 110 9.6 11.5 11.5 above average 2 347 30.2 36.2 47.7 average 3 209 18.2 21.8 69.4 below average 4 89 7.8 9.3 78.7 poor 5 204 17.8 21.3 100.0 . 102 8.9 Missing not sure 6 87 7.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 959 Missing cases 189 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALDQ2 Q21 Overall evaluation, Quayle Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 46 4.0 4.5 4.5 above average 2 120 10.5 11.8 16.4 average 3 160 13.9 15.8 32.1 below average 4 143 12.5 14.1 46.2 poor 5 546 47.6 53.8 100.0 . 88 7.7 Missing not sure 6 45 3.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1015 Missing cases 133 EVALJS2 Q21 Overall evaluation, Stockdale Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 6 .5 .9 .9 above average 2 15 1.3 2.3 3.3 average 3 90 7.8 14.0 17.3 below average 4 119 10.4 18.5 35.8 poor 5 412 35.9 64.2 100.0 . 139 12.1 Missing not sure 6 367 32.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 642 Missing cases 506 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALPB2 Q21 Overall evaluation, Buchanan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 19 1.7 2.1 2.1 above average 2 64 5.6 7.1 9.3 average 3 87 7.6 9.7 19.0 below average 4 105 9.1 11.7 30.7 poor 5 622 54.2 69.3 100.0 . 120 10.5 Missing not sure 6 131 11.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 897 Missing cases 251 EVALJJ2 Q21 Overall evaluation, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 14 1.2 1.5 1.5 above average 2 124 10.8 13.2 14.7 average 3 179 15.6 19.0 33.7 below average 4 157 13.7 16.7 50.4 poor 5 466 40.6 49.6 100.0 . 117 10.2 Missing not sure 6 91 7.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 940 Missing cases 208 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALRR2 Q21 Overall evaluation, Reagan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 90 7.8 9.0 9.0 above average 2 152 13.2 15.1 24.1 average 3 165 14.4 16.4 40.5 below average 4 159 13.9 15.8 56.3 poor 5 439 38.2 43.7 100.0 . 125 10.9 Missing not sure 6 18 1.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1005 Missing cases 143 EVALDH2 Q21 Overall evaluation, D Hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 62 5.4 7.3 7.3 above average 2 233 20.3 27.5 34.9 average 3 281 24.5 33.2 68.1 below average 4 90 7.8 10.6 78.7 poor 5 180 15.7 21.3 100.0 . 212 18.5 Missing not sure 6 90 7.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 846 Missing cases 302 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALRH2 Q21 Overall evaluation, R Hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 65 5.7 7.5 7.5 above average 2 167 14.5 19.3 26.8 average 3 259 22.6 29.9 56.7 below average 4 120 10.5 13.9 70.6 poor 5 255 22.2 29.4 100.0 . 169 14.7 Missing not sure 6 113 9.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 866 Missing cases 282 EVALDP2 Q21 Overall evaluation, D Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 38 3.3 3.7 3.7 above average 2 280 24.4 27.2 30.9 average 3 341 29.7 33.1 64.0 below average 4 138 12.0 13.4 77.5 poor 5 232 20.2 22.5 100.0 . 92 8.0 Missing not sure 6 27 2.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1029 Missing cases 119 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALRP2 Q21 Overall evaluation, R Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 19 1.7 1.9 1.9 above average 2 138 12.0 13.5 15.4 average 3 294 25.6 28.8 44.2 below average 4 239 20.8 23.4 67.6 poor 5 330 28.7 32.4 100.0 . 100 8.7 Missing not sure 6 28 2.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1020 Missing cases 128 EVALCNG2 Q21 Overall evaluation, US Congress Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 7 .6 .7 .7 above average 2 80 7.0 7.9 8.5 average 3 351 30.6 34.4 43.0 below average 4 284 24.7 27.9 70.9 poor 5 297 25.9 29.1 100.0 . 104 9.1 Missing not sure 6 25 2.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1019 Missing cases 129 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALSC2 Q21 Overall evaluation, Supreme Court Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 17 1.5 1.7 1.7 above average 2 154 13.4 15.4 17.0 average 3 399 34.8 39.8 56.8 below average 4 249 21.7 24.8 81.7 poor 5 184 16.0 18.3 100.0 . 103 9.0 Missing not sure 6 42 3.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1003 Missing cases 145 EVALBUS2 Q21 Overall evaluation, Business Corp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 11 1.0 1.1 1.1 above average 2 104 9.1 10.7 11.8 average 3 344 30.0 35.3 47.1 below average 4 232 20.2 23.8 70.9 poor 5 283 24.7 29.1 100.0 . 104 9.1 Missing not sure 6 70 6.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 974 Missing cases 174 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALMIL2 Q21 Overall evaluation, US military Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent outstanding 1 120 10.5 11.9 11.9 above average 2 341 29.7 33.8 45.6 average 3 316 27.5 31.3 76.9 below average 4 115 10.0 11.4 88.3 poor 5 118 10.3 11.7 100.0 . 95 8.3 Missing not sure 6 43 3.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1010 Missing cases 138 PNECON2 Q22 Nations economy, past 12 months Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent much worse 1 90 7.8 8.1 8.1 somewhat worse 2 273 23.8 24.7 32.8 stayed the same 3 298 26.0 26.9 59.7 somewhat better 4 402 35.0 36.3 96.0 much better 5 44 3.8 4.0 100.0 . 41 3.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1107 Missing cases 41 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FNECON2 Q22 Nations economy, next 12 months Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent much worse 1 76 6.6 7.0 7.0 somewhat worse 2 160 13.9 14.7 21.7 stayed the same 3 236 20.6 21.7 43.3 somewhat better 4 539 47.0 49.4 92.8 much better 5 79 6.9 7.2 100.0 . 58 5.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1090 Missing cases 58 PPECON2 Q22 Family financial, past 12 months Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent much worse 1 71 6.2 6.4 6.4 somewhat worse 2 207 18.0 18.7 25.1 stayed the same 3 533 46.4 48.1 73.3 somewhat better 4 249 21.7 22.5 95.8 much better 5 47 4.1 4.2 100.0 . 41 3.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1107 Missing cases 41 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FPECON2 Q22 Family financial, next 12 months Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent much worse 1 62 5.4 5.7 5.7 somewhat worse 2 186 16.2 17.1 22.8 stayed the same 3 483 42.1 44.4 67.1 somewhat better 4 309 26.9 28.4 95.5 much better 5 49 4.3 4.5 100.0 . 59 5.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1089 Missing cases 59 WIFE2 Q23a Cant be good wife/mother & hold off Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly disagree 1 325 28.3 32.6 32.6 disagree 2 437 38.1 43.9 76.5 agree 4 188 16.4 18.9 95.4 strongly agree 5 46 4.0 4.6 100.0 . 39 3.4 Missing not sure 3 113 9.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 996 Missing cases 152 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MEN2 Q23b Men better, emotionally, than women Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly disagree 1 456 39.7 45.3 45.3 disagree 2 362 31.5 36.0 81.3 agree 4 146 12.7 14.5 95.8 strongly agree 5 42 3.7 4.2 100.0 . 36 3.1 Missing not sure 3 106 9.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1006 Missing cases 142 DIVGVT2 Q23c Diff parties control Congres/Pres Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly disagree 1 161 14.0 17.9 17.9 disagree 2 456 39.7 50.7 68.6 agree 4 216 18.8 24.0 92.6 strongly agree 5 67 5.8 7.4 100.0 . 43 3.7 Missing not sure 3 205 17.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 900 Missing cases 248 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BETJOB2 Q23d I could do better in offc than most Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly disagree 1 64 5.6 8.8 8.8 disagree 2 233 20.3 31.9 40.7 agree 4 329 28.7 45.1 85.8 strongly agree 5 104 9.1 14.2 100.0 . 51 4.4 Missing not sure 3 367 32.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 730 Missing cases 418 RIDPTY2 Q23e Get rid of parties Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly disagree 1 389 33.9 42.6 42.6 disagree 2 401 34.9 43.9 86.4 agree 4 76 6.6 8.3 94.7 strongly agree 5 48 4.2 5.3 100.0 . 46 4.0 Missing not sure 3 188 16.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 914 Missing cases 234 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PTYCONF2 Q23f Parties confuse issues/no choice Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly disagree 1 150 13.1 15.6 15.6 disagree 2 413 36.0 42.9 58.5 agree 4 319 27.8 33.1 91.6 strongly agree 5 81 7.1 8.4 100.0 . 47 4.1 Missing not sure 3 138 12.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 963 Missing cases 185 HUSB2 Q23g Cant be good husband/father & hold Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent strongly disagree 1 356 31.0 35.5 35.5 disagree 2 505 44.0 50.4 85.9 agree 4 122 10.6 12.2 98.1 strongly agree 5 19 1.7 1.9 100.0 . 40 3.5 Missing not sure 3 106 9.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1002 Missing cases 146 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TEACH2 Q24 Teacher organization Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent never a member 1 855 74.5 79.8 79.8 formerly a member 2 143 12.5 13.4 93.2 currently a member 3 40 3.5 3.7 96.9 currently active or 4 33 2.9 3.1 100.0 . 77 6.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1071 Missing cases 77 BUSORG2 Q24 Business organization Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent never a member 1 792 69.0 74.9 74.9 formerly a member 2 134 11.7 12.7 87.5 currently a member 3 89 7.8 8.4 95.9 currently active or 4 43 3.7 4.1 100.0 . 90 7.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1058 Missing cases 90 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - VET2 Q24 Veterans groups Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent never a member 1 871 75.9 82.7 82.7 formerly a member 2 69 6.0 6.6 89.3 currently a member 3 82 7.1 7.8 97.1 currently active or 4 31 2.7 2.9 100.0 . 95 8.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1053 Missing cases 95 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WOMEN2 Q18 Womens rights groups Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent never a member 1 895 78.0 84.8 84.8 formerly a member 2 76 6.6 7.2 92.0 currently a member 3 69 6.0 6.5 98.5 currently active or 4 16 1.4 1.5 100.0 . 92 8.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1056 Missing cases 92 CIVILR2 Q24 Civil rights groups Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent never a member 1 885 77.1 83.2 83.2 formerly a member 2 76 6.6 7.1 90.3 currently a member 3 81 7.1 7.6 97.9 currently active or 4 22 1.9 2.1 100.0 . 84 7.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1064 Missing cases 84 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ENVIR2 Q24 Environmental groups Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent never a member 1 786 68.5 74.1 74.1 formerly a member 2 111 9.7 10.5 84.5 currently a member 3 145 12.6 13.7 98.2 currently active or 4 19 1.7 1.8 100.0 . 87 7.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1061 Missing cases 87 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NONPRT2 Q24 Non-partisan interest groups Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent never a member 1 786 68.5 73.7 73.7 formerly a member 2 137 11.9 12.8 86.5 currently a member 3 116 10.1 10.9 97.4 currently active or 4 28 2.4 2.6 100.0 . 81 7.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1067 Missing cases 81 LABOR2 Q24 Labor union Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent never a member 1 805 70.1 75.9 75.9 formerly a member 2 161 14.0 15.2 91.0 currently a member 3 46 4.0 4.3 95.4 currently active or 4 49 4.3 4.6 100.0 . 87 7.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1061 Missing cases 87 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FARM2 Q24 Farm organization Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent never a member 1 787 68.6 75.3 75.3 formerly a member 2 96 8.4 9.2 84.5 currently a member 3 122 10.6 11.7 96.2 currently active or 4 40 3.5 3.8 100.0 . 103 9.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1045 Missing cases 103 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVAN2 Q24 Evangelical group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent never a member 1 973 84.8 92.4 92.4 formerly a member 2 20 1.7 1.9 94.3 currently a member 3 40 3.5 3.8 98.1 currently active or 4 20 1.7 1.9 100.0 . 95 8.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1053 Missing cases 95 ANTIAB2 Q24 Anti-abortion group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent never a member 1 940 81.9 89.1 89.1 formerly a member 2 24 2.1 2.3 91.4 currently a member 3 58 5.1 5.5 96.9 currently active or 4 33 2.9 3.1 100.0 . 93 8.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1055 Missing cases 93 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LIBID2 Q24 Liberal ideol group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent never a member 1 915 79.7 86.6 86.6 formerly a member 2 65 5.7 6.1 92.7 currently a member 3 62 5.4 5.9 98.6 currently active or 4 15 1.3 1.4 100.0 . 91 7.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1057 Missing cases 91 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONID2 Q24 Conservative ideological group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent never a member 1 957 83.4 91.1 91.1 formerly a member 2 29 2.5 2.8 93.9 currently a member 3 49 4.3 4.7 98.6 currently active or 4 15 1.3 1.4 100.0 . 98 8.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1050 Missing cases 98 TCHNEV2 Q25 Teachers org, never active Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 857 74.7 100.0 100.0 . 291 25.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 857 Missing cases 291 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TCHOLD2 Q25 Teachers org, not active in last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 90 7.8 98.9 98.9 2 1 .1 1.1 100.0 . 1057 92.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 91 Missing cases 1057 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TCHPRO2 Q25 Teachers org, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 11 1.0 100.0 100.0 . 1137 99.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 11 Missing cases 1137 TCHFRD2 Q25 Teachers org, tried convince others Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 36 3.1 100.0 100.0 . 1112 96.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 36 Missing cases 1112 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TCHPD2 Q25 Teachers org, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 82 7.1 100.0 100.0 . 1066 92.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 82 Missing cases 1066 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TCHATT2 Q25 Teachers org, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 63 5.5 100.0 100.0 . 1085 94.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 63 Missing cases 1085 BUSNEV2 Q25 Business org, never active Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 821 71.5 100.0 100.0 . 327 28.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 821 Missing cases 327 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BUSOLD2 Q25 Business org, not active in last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 73 6.4 98.6 98.6 2 1 .1 1.4 100.0 . 1074 93.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 74 Missing cases 1074 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BUSPRO2 Q25 Business org, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 2 .2 100.0 100.0 . 1146 99.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2 Missing cases 1146 BUSFRD2 Q25 Business org, tried convince others Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 24 2.1 100.0 100.0 . 1124 97.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 24 Missing cases 1124 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BUSPD2 Q25 Business org, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 97 8.4 100.0 100.0 . 1051 91.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 97 Missing cases 1051 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BUSATT2 Q25 Business org, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 87 7.6 100.0 100.0 . 1061 92.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 87 Missing cases 1061 VETNEV2 Q25 Veterans groups, never active Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 869 75.7 100.0 100.0 . 279 24.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 869 Missing cases 279 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - VETOLD2 Q25 Veterans groups, not active in last Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 45 3.9 97.8 97.8 2 1 .1 2.2 100.0 . 1102 96.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 46 Missing cases 1102 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - VETPRO2 Q25 Veterans groups, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 10 .9 100.0 100.0 . 1138 99.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 10 Missing cases 1138 VETFRD2 Q25 Veterans groups, tried convince othe Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 28 2.4 100.0 100.0 . 1120 97.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 28 Missing cases 1120 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - VETPD2 Q25 Veterans groups, paid membership due Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 77 6.7 100.0 100.0 . 1071 93.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 77 Missing cases 1071 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - VETATT2 Q25 Veterans groups, attend group meetin Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 41 3.6 100.0 100.0 . 1107 96.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 41 Missing cases 1107 WOMNEV2 Q25 Womens rights, never active Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 849 74.0 100.0 100.0 . 299 26.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 849 Missing cases 299 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WOMOLD2 Q25 Womens rights, not active in last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 50 4.4 98.0 98.0 2 1 .1 2.0 100.0 . 1097 95.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 51 Missing cases 1097 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WOMPRO2 Q25 Womens rights, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 57 5.0 98.3 98.3 3 1 .1 1.7 100.0 . 1090 94.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 58 Missing cases 1090 WOMFRD2 Q25 Womens rights, tried convince others Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 26 2.3 96.3 96.3 4 1 .1 3.7 100.0 . 1121 97.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 27 Missing cases 1121 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WOMPD2 Q25 Womens rights, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 78 6.8 98.7 98.7 5 1 .1 1.3 100.0 . 1069 93.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 79 Missing cases 1069 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WOMATT2 Q25 Womens rights, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 41 3.6 97.6 97.6 6 1 .1 2.4 100.0 . 1106 96.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 42 Missing cases 1106 CIVNEV2 Q25 Civil rights, never active Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 851 74.1 100.0 100.0 . 297 25.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 851 Missing cases 297 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CIVOLD2 Q25 Civil rights, not active in last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 61 5.3 100.0 100.0 . 1087 94.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 61 Missing cases 1087 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CIVPRO2 Q25 Civil rights, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 27 2.4 96.4 96.4 3 1 .1 3.6 100.0 . 1120 97.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 28 Missing cases 1120 CIVFRD2 Q25 Civil rights, tried convince others Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 27 2.4 100.0 100.0 . 1121 97.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 27 Missing cases 1121 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CIVPD2 Q25 Civil rights, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 97 8.4 100.0 100.0 . 1051 91.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 97 Missing cases 1051 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CIVATT2 Q25 Civil rights, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 26 2.3 100.0 100.0 . 1122 97.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 26 Missing cases 1122 ENVNEV2 Q25 Enviro groups, never active Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 775 67.5 100.0 100.0 . 373 32.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 775 Missing cases 373 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ENVOLD2 Q25 Enviro groups, not active in last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 70 6.1 100.0 100.0 . 1078 93.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 70 Missing cases 1078 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ENVPRO2 Q25 Enviro groups, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 18 1.6 100.0 100.0 . 1130 98.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 18 Missing cases 1130 ENVFRD2 Q25 Enviro groups, tried convince others Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 35 3.0 100.0 100.0 . 1113 97.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 35 Missing cases 1113 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ENVPD2 Q25 Enviro groups, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 148 12.9 99.3 99.3 5 1 .1 .7 100.0 . 999 87.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 149 Missing cases 999 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ENVATT2 Q25 Enviro groups, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 55 4.8 100.0 100.0 . 1093 95.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 55 Missing cases 1093 INTNEV2 Q25 Non-partisan, never active Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 776 67.6 100.0 100.0 . 372 32.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 776 Missing cases 372 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INTOLD2 Q25 Non-partisan, not active in last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 93 8.1 97.9 97.9 2 2 .2 2.1 100.0 . 1053 91.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 95 Missing cases 1053 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INTPRO2 Q25 Non-partisan, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 15 1.3 100.0 100.0 . 1133 98.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 15 Missing cases 1133 INTFRD2 Q25 Non-partisan, tried convince others Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 33 2.9 100.0 100.0 . 1115 97.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 33 Missing cases 1115 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INTPD2 Q25 Non-partisan, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 120 10.5 98.4 98.4 5 2 .2 1.6 100.0 . 1026 89.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 122 Missing cases 1026 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INTATT2 Q25 Non-partisan, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 69 6.0 98.6 98.6 6 1 .1 1.4 100.0 . 1078 93.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 70 Missing cases 1078 LABNEV2 Q25 Labor union, never active Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 810 70.6 100.0 100.0 . 338 29.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 810 Missing cases 338 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LABOLD2 Q25 Labor union, not active in last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 82 7.1 98.8 98.8 2 1 .1 1.2 100.0 . 1065 92.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 83 Missing cases 1065 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LABPRO2 Q25 Labor union, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 42 3.7 100.0 100.0 . 1106 96.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 42 Missing cases 1106 LABFRD2 Q25 Labor union, tried convince others Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 47 4.1 100.0 100.0 . 1101 95.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 47 Missing cases 1101 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LABPD2 Q25 Labor union, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 101 8.8 100.0 100.0 . 1047 91.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 101 Missing cases 1047 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LABATT2 Q25 Labor union, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 76 6.6 100.0 100.0 . 1072 93.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 76 Missing cases 1072 FRMNEV2 Q25 Farm org, never active Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 797 69.4 100.0 100.0 . 351 30.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 797 Missing cases 351 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FRMOLD2 Q25 Farm org, active but not in last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 62 5.4 98.4 98.4 2 1 .1 1.6 100.0 . 1085 94.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 63 Missing cases 1085 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FRMPRO2 Q25 Farm org, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 2 .2 100.0 100.0 . 1146 99.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2 Missing cases 1146 FRMFRD2 Q25 Farm org, tried convince others Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 23 2.0 100.0 100.0 . 1125 98.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 23 Missing cases 1125 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FRMPD2 Q25 Farm org, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 136 11.8 100.0 100.0 . 1012 88.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 136 Missing cases 1012 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FRMATT2 Q25 Farm org, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 64 5.6 100.0 100.0 . 1084 94.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 64 Missing cases 1084 JESNEV2 Q25 Evangelical group, never active Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 928 80.8 100.0 100.0 . 220 19.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 928 Missing cases 220 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - JESOLD2 Q25 Evangelical group, not active in las Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 17 1.5 100.0 100.0 . 1131 98.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 17 Missing cases 1131 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - JESPRO2 Q25 Evangelical group, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 14 1.2 100.0 100.0 . 1134 98.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 14 Missing cases 1134 JESFRD2 Q25 Evangelical group, tried convince ot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 24 2.1 100.0 100.0 . 1124 97.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 24 Missing cases 1124 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - JESPD2 Q25 Evangelical group, paid membership d Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 44 3.8 100.0 100.0 . 1104 96.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 44 Missing cases 1104 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - JESATT2 Q25 Evangelical group, attend group meet Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 31 2.7 96.9 96.9 6 1 .1 3.1 100.0 . 1116 97.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 32 Missing cases 1116 ABNEV2 Q25 Anti-abortion, never active Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 885 77.1 100.0 100.0 . 263 22.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 885 Missing cases 263 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABOLD2 Q25 Anti-abortion, not active in last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 24 2.1 100.0 100.0 . 1124 97.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 24 Missing cases 1124 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABPRO2 Q25 Anti-abortion, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 34 3.0 100.0 100.0 . 1114 97.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 34 Missing cases 1114 ABFRD2 Q25 Anti-abortion, tried convince others Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 42 3.7 100.0 100.0 . 1106 96.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 42 Missing cases 1106 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABPD2 Q25 Anti-abortion, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 59 5.1 100.0 100.0 . 1089 94.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 59 Missing cases 1089 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABATT2 Q25 Anti-abortion, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 45 3.9 97.8 97.8 6 1 .1 2.2 100.0 . 1102 96.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 46 Missing cases 1102 LIBNEV2 Q25 Liberal ideol, never active Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 872 76.0 100.0 100.0 . 276 24.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 872 Missing cases 276 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LIBOLD2 Q25 Liberal ideol, not active in last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 49 4.3 98.0 98.0 2 1 .1 2.0 100.0 . 1098 95.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 50 Missing cases 1098 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LIBPRO2 Q25 Liberal ideol, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 25 2.2 100.0 100.0 . 1123 97.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 25 Missing cases 1123 LIBFRD2 Q25 Liberal ideol, tried convince others Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 22 1.9 100.0 100.0 . 1126 98.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 22 Missing cases 1126 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LIBPD2 Q25 Liberal ideol, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 60 5.2 98.4 98.4 5 1 .1 1.6 100.0 . 1087 94.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 61 Missing cases 1087 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LIBATT2 Q25 Liberal ideol, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 42 3.7 97.7 97.7 6 1 .1 2.3 100.0 . 1105 96.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 43 Missing cases 1105 CONNEV2 Q25 Cons ideol, never active Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 908 79.1 100.0 100.0 . 240 20.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 908 Missing cases 240 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONOLD2 Q25 Cons ideol, not active in last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 23 2.0 100.0 100.0 . 1125 98.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 23 Missing cases 1125 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONPRO2 Q25 Cons ideol, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 10 .9 100.0 100.0 . 1138 99.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 10 Missing cases 1138 CONFRD2 Q25 Cons ideol, tried convince others Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 21 1.8 100.0 100.0 . 1127 98.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 21 Missing cases 1127 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONPD2 Q25 Cons ideol, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 39 3.4 100.0 100.0 . 1109 96.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 39 Missing cases 1109 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONATT2 Q25 Cons ideol, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent checked 1 38 3.3 97.4 97.4 6 1 .1 2.6 100.0 . 1109 96.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 39 Missing cases 1109 AGE2 Q26 What is your age Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 17-24 1 46 4.0 4.0 4.0 25-29 2 35 3.0 3.1 7.1 30-39 3 181 15.8 15.9 23.0 40-49 4 288 25.1 25.3 48.3 50-59 5 209 18.2 18.4 66.7 60-64 6 124 10.8 10.9 77.6 65 and older 7 255 22.2 22.4 100.0 . 10 .9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1138 Missing cases 10 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SEX2 Q27 What is your sex Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent male 1 605 52.7 53.4 53.4 female 2 529 46.1 46.6 100.0 . 14 1.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1134 Missing cases 14 HOWREL2 Q28 How religious do you consider yourse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent very religious 1 258 22.5 23.4 23.4 fairly religious 2 564 49.1 51.2 74.6 not very religious 3 188 16.4 17.1 91.7 not religious at all 4 92 8.0 8.3 100.0 . 17 1.5 Missing not sure 5 29 2.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1102 Missing cases 46 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INCOME2 Q29 Approximate family income last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent under 9999 1 52 4.5 4.8 4.8 10000-19999 2 100 8.7 9.2 14.0 20000-29999 3 163 14.2 15.0 28.9 30000-39999 4 180 15.7 16.5 45.5 40000-49999 5 161 14.0 14.8 60.2 50000-59999 6 131 11.4 12.0 72.3 60000-69999 7 78 6.8 7.2 79.4 70000-79999 8 67 5.8 6.2 85.6 80000-89999 9 36 3.1 3.3 88.9 90000-99999 10 23 2.0 2.1 91.0 over 100000 11 98 8.5 9.0 100.0 . 59 5.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1089 Missing cases 59 CHILD2 Q30 Children under 12 yrs at home Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 231 20.1 20.5 20.5 no 2 898 78.2 79.5 100.0 . 19 1.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1129 Missing cases 19 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SCHOOL2 Q31 How much formal schooling completed Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0-8 1 11 1.0 1.0 1.0 9-11 2 28 2.4 2.5 3.5 12 3 194 16.9 17.3 20.8 13-15 4 270 23.5 24.1 44.9 college graduate 5 295 25.7 26.3 71.3 graduate school 6 322 28.0 28.7 100.0 . 28 2.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1120 Missing cases 28 RACE2 Q32 What is your race Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent white 1 1077 93.8 95.6 95.6 black 2 31 2.7 2.8 98.4 hispanic 3 5 .4 .4 98.8 native american 4 3 .3 .3 99.1 asian american 5 4 .3 .4 99.5 other 6 6 .5 .5 100.0 . 22 1.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1126 Missing cases 22 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - REL2 Q33 What is your religious preference Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent catholic 1 188 16.4 17.2 17.2 jewish 2 26 2.3 2.4 19.6 protestant 3 713 62.1 65.2 84.7 no religious prefere 4 98 8.5 9.0 93.7 other 5 69 6.0 6.3 100.0 . 54 4.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1094 Missing cases 54 MILDUTY2 Q34 Served active military duty-at least Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent yes 1 249 21.7 22.5 22.5 no 2 860 74.9 77.5 100.0 . 39 3.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1109 Missing cases 39 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONTH2 Q35 month Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 1 .1 .1 .1 2 6 .5 .5 .6 3 929 80.9 83.9 84.6 4 125 10.9 11.3 95.8 5 41 3.6 3.7 99.5 6 2 .2 .2 99.7 12 1 .1 .1 99.8 13 1 .1 .1 99.9 15 1 .1 .1 100.0 . 41 3.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1107 Missing cases 41 DAY2 Q35 day Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 2 .2 .2 .2 1 4 .3 .4 .5 2 3 .3 .3 .8 3 20 1.7 1.8 2.6 4 198 17.2 17.9 20.6 5 165 14.4 14.9 35.5 6 101 8.8 9.1 44.7 7 58 5.1 5.3 49.9 8 47 4.1 4.3 54.2 9 48 4.2 4.3 58.5 10 42 3.7 3.8 62.3 11 50 4.4 4.5 66.8 12 39 3.4 3.5 70.4 13 33 2.9 3.0 73.4 14 27 2.4 2.4 75.8 15 44 3.8 4.0 79.8 16 13 1.1 1.2 81.0 17 14 1.2 1.3 82.2 18 22 1.9 2.0 84.2 19 6 .5 .5 84.8 20 13 1.1 1.2 86.0 21 10 .9 .9 86.9 22 14 1.2 1.3 88.1 23 33 2.9 3.0 91.1 24 27 2.4 2.4 93.6 25 14 1.2 1.3 94.8 26 15 1.3 1.4 96.2 27 13 1.1 1.2 97.4 28 12 1.0 1.1 98.5 29 8 .7 .7 99.2 30 6 .5 .5 99.7 31 3 .3 .3 100.0 . 44 3.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1104 Missing cases 44 RSPN92 responded to 1992 wave Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1.00 1148 100.0 100.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1148 Missing cases 0 **********1994 Post-election Wave********** INT94 Q1 Interest in Hse campaign this year Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY INTERESTED 1 602 52.4 71.7 71.7 2 169 14.7 20.1 91.8 3 54 4.7 6.4 98.2 NOT AT ALL INTERESTE 4 15 1.3 1.8 100.0 . 308 26.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 840 Missing cases 308 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HSEVOT94 Q2 Vote in the Hse race in your district Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE 1 483 42.1 57.4 57.4 REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE 2 312 27.2 37.1 94.5 INDEPENDENT/OTHER 3 10 .9 1.2 95.7 DID NOT VOTE 4 36 3.1 4.3 100.0 . 307 26.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 841 Missing cases 307 VOTE9294 Q3 Vote in the 1992 presidential electio Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent GEORGE BUSH 1 271 23.6 32.3 32.3 BILL CLINTON 2 524 45.6 62.4 94.6 H. ROSS PEROT 3 38 3.3 4.5 99.2 OTHER 4 6 .5 .7 99.9 DID NOT VOTE 5 1 .1 .1 100.0 . 308 26.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 840 Missing cases 308 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - APPBC94 Q4 Approve/disapprove of Clinton handlin Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent APPROVE STRONGLY 1 99 8.6 12.1 12.1 2 335 29.2 40.9 52.9 3 76 6.6 9.3 62.2 4 148 12.9 18.0 80.2 DISAPPROVE STRONGLY 5 162 14.1 19.8 100.0 . 309 26.9 Missing NOT SURE 6 19 1.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 820 Missing cases 328 PTYID94 Q5 Party affiliation Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONG DEMOCRAT 1 334 29.1 40.1 40.1 WEAK DEMOCRAT 2 138 12.0 16.6 56.7 LEANING DEMOCRAT 3 54 4.7 6.5 63.1 INDEPENDENT 4 17 1.5 2.0 65.2 LEANING REPUBLICAN 5 41 3.6 4.9 70.1 WEAK REPUBLICAN 6 78 6.8 9.4 79.5 STRONG REPUBLICAN 7 171 14.9 20.5 100.0 . 311 27.1 Missing OTHER 8 4 .3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 833 Missing cases 315 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ALWAYS94 Q6 Characterize self as someone who Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent INVOLVED IN YEAR AFT 1 656 57.1 79.2 79.2 INVOLVED ONLY WHEN T 2 172 15.0 20.8 100.0 . 320 27.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 828 Missing cases 320 TRUST94 Q7 Trust govt in DC to do right Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent JUST ABOUT ALWAYS 1 9 .8 1.1 1.1 MOST OF THE TIME 2 245 21.3 29.3 30.4 ONLY SOME OF THE TIM 3 490 42.7 58.7 89.1 ALMOST NEVER 4 91 7.9 10.9 100.0 . 313 27.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 835 Missing cases 313 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LIBCON94 Q8 Political philosophy Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 39 3.4 4.8 4.8 LIBERAL 2 189 16.5 23.2 28.0 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 121 10.5 14.9 42.9 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 137 11.9 16.8 59.7 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 101 8.8 12.4 72.1 CONSERVATIVE 6 186 16.2 22.9 95.0 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 35 3.0 4.3 99.3 9 6 .5 .7 100.0 . 322 28.0 Missing NOT SURE 8 12 1.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 814 Missing cases 334 CMHSED94 Q9 Active in Dem hse campaign Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY ACTIVE 1 75 6.5 11.8 11.8 2 205 17.9 32.3 44.1 3 160 13.9 25.2 69.3 NOT ACTIVE AT ALL 4 195 17.0 30.7 100.0 . 513 44.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 635 Missing cases 513 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CMHSER94 Q9 Active in Rep hse campaign Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY ACTIVE 1 34 3.0 6.7 6.7 2 133 11.6 26.3 33.0 3 105 9.1 20.8 53.8 NOT ACTIVE AT ALL 4 234 20.4 46.2 100.0 . 642 55.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 506 Missing cases 642 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CMHSEI94 Q9 Active in Ind hse campaign Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY ACTIVE 1 2 .2 .7 .7 2 2 .2 .7 1.4 3 19 1.7 6.8 8.3 NOT ACTIVE AT ALL 4 255 22.2 91.7 100.0 . 870 75.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 278 Missing cases 870 DHNOM94 Q10 Vote for party hse nomination, Dem Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VOTED FOR THE NOMINA 1 250 21.8 47.3 47.3 VOTED FOR ANOTHER CA 2 35 3.0 6.6 53.9 DID NOT VOTE 3 85 7.4 16.1 69.9 NO NOMINATION CONTES 4 159 13.9 30.1 100.0 . 619 53.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 529 Missing cases 619 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RHNOM94 Q10 Vote for party hse nomination, Rep Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VOTED FOR THE NOMINA 1 180 15.7 50.3 50.3 VOTED FOR ANOTHER CA 2 25 2.2 7.0 57.3 DID NOT VOTE 3 81 7.1 22.6 79.9 NO NOMINATION CONTES 4 72 6.3 20.1 100.0 . 790 68.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 358 Missing cases 790 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FMEMR94 Q11 Formerly member local party, Rep Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 87 7.6 100.0 100.0 . 1061 92.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 87 Missing cases 1061 CMEMR94 Q11 Currently member local party, Rep Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 23 2.0 100.0 100.0 . 1125 98.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 23 Missing cases 1125 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FMEMD94 Q11 Formerly member local party, Dem Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 22 1.9 100.0 100.0 . 1126 98.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 22 Missing cases 1126 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CMEMD94 Q11 Currently member local party, Dem Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 10 .9 100.0 100.0 . 1138 99.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 10 Missing cases 1138 FCHRR94 Q11 Formerly chair local party, Rep Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 7 .6 100.0 100.0 . 1141 99.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 7 Missing cases 1141 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CCHRR94 Q11 Currently chair local party, Rep Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 98 8.5 100.0 100.0 . 1050 91.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 98 Missing cases 1050 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FCHRD94 Q11 Formerly chair local party, Dem Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 13 1.1 100.0 100.0 . 1135 98.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 13 Missing cases 1135 CCHRD94 Q11 Currently chair local party, Dem Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 18 1.6 100.0 100.0 . 1130 98.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 18 Missing cases 1130 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FLCLR94 Q11 Formerly other local party, Rep Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 10 .9 100.0 100.0 . 1138 99.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 10 Missing cases 1138 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLCLR94 Q11 Currently other local party, Rep Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 6 .5 100.0 100.0 . 1142 99.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 6 Missing cases 1142 FLCLD94 Q11 Formerly other local party, Dem Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 134 11.7 100.0 100.0 . 1014 88.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 134 Missing cases 1014 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLCLD94 Q11 Currently other local party, Dem Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 32 2.8 100.0 100.0 . 1116 97.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 32 Missing cases 1116 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FCDR94 Q11 Formerly cong dist party, Rep Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 53 4.6 100.0 100.0 . 1095 95.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 53 Missing cases 1095 CCDR94 Q11 Currently cong dist party, Rep Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 26 2.3 100.0 100.0 . 1122 97.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 26 Missing cases 1122 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FCDD94 Q11 Formerly cong dist party, Dem Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 13 1.1 100.0 100.0 . 1135 98.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 13 Missing cases 1135 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CCDD94 Q11 Currently cong dist party, Dem Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 141 12.3 100.0 100.0 . 1007 87.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 141 Missing cases 1007 FCCR94 Q11 Formerly state central comm, Rep Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 17 1.5 100.0 100.0 . 1131 98.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 17 Missing cases 1131 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CCCR94 Q11 Currently state central comm, Rep Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 27 2.4 100.0 100.0 . 1121 97.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 27 Missing cases 1121 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FCCD94 Q11 Formerly state central comm, Dem Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 16 1.4 100.0 100.0 . 1132 98.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 16 Missing cases 1132 CCCD94 Q11 Currenty state central comm, Dem Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 8 .7 100.0 100.0 . 1140 99.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 8 Missing cases 1140 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVDH94 Q12 Canvassing, Dem House Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 76 6.6 100.0 100.0 . 1072 93.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 76 Missing cases 1072 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLRKDH94 Q12 Clerical/office, Dem House Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 39 3.4 100.0 100.0 . 1109 96.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 39 Missing cases 1109 CONVDH94 Q12 Tried to convince friemds, Dem House Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 270 23.5 100.0 100.0 . 878 76.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 270 Missing cases 878 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONDH94 Q12 Contributed money, Dem House Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 237 20.6 100.0 100.0 . 911 79.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 237 Missing cases 911 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OTHRDH94 Q12 Other activity, Dem House Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 145 12.6 100.0 100.0 . 1003 87.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 145 Missing cases 1003 CANVRH94 Q12 Canvassing, Rep House Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 39 3.4 100.0 100.0 . 1109 96.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 39 Missing cases 1109 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLRKRH94 Q12 Clerical/office, Rep House Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 14 1.2 100.0 100.0 . 1134 98.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 14 Missing cases 1134 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVRH94 Q12 Tried to convince friends, Rep House Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 168 14.6 100.0 100.0 . 980 85.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 168 Missing cases 980 MONRH94 Q12 Contributed money, Rep House Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 122 10.6 100.0 100.0 . 1026 89.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 122 Missing cases 1026 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OTHRRH94 Q12 Other activity, Rep House Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 103 9.0 100.0 100.0 . 1045 91.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 103 Missing cases 1045 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVIH94 Q12 Canvassing, Ind House Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent . 1148 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 1148 CLRKIH94 Q12 Clerical/office, Ind House Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent . 1148 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 1148 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVIH94 Q12 Tried to convince friends, Ind House Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 1 .1 100.0 100.0 . 1147 99.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1 Missing cases 1147 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONIH94 Q12 Contributed money, Ind House Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 1 .1 100.0 100.0 . 1147 99.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1 Missing cases 1147 OTHRIH94 Q12 Other activity, Ind House Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 2 .2 100.0 100.0 . 1146 99.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2 Missing cases 1146 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SENGUB94 Q13 A Sen or gub race in state Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 749 65.2 94.3 94.3 NO 2 45 3.9 5.7 100.0 . 354 30.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 794 Missing cases 354 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SENVOT94 S1 Vote in Senate election Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE 1 304 26.5 73.3 73.3 REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE 2 83 7.2 20.0 93.3 INDEPENDENT/OTHER 3 7 .6 1.7 94.9 DID NOT VOTE 4 21 1.8 5.1 100.0 . 733 63.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 415 Missing cases 733 CANVDS94 S2 Canvassing, Dem Senate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 44 3.8 100.0 100.0 . 1104 96.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 44 Missing cases 1104 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLRKDS94 S2 Clerical/office, Dem Senate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 24 2.1 100.0 100.0 . 1124 97.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 24 Missing cases 1124 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVDS94 S2 Tried to convince friends, Dem Senate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 195 17.0 100.0 100.0 . 953 83.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 195 Missing cases 953 MONDS94 S2 Contributed money, Dem Senate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 137 11.9 100.0 100.0 . 1011 88.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 137 Missing cases 1011 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OTHRDS94 S2 Other activity, Dem Senate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 97 8.4 100.0 100.0 . 1051 91.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 97 Missing cases 1051 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVRS94 S2 Canvassing, Rep Senate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 9 .8 100.0 100.0 . 1139 99.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 9 Missing cases 1139 CLRKRS94 S2 Clerical/office, Rep Senate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent . 1148 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 1148 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVRS94 S2 Tried to convince friends, Rep Senate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 41 3.6 100.0 100.0 . 1107 96.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 41 Missing cases 1107 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONRS94 S2 Contributed money, Rep Senate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 19 1.7 100.0 100.0 . 1129 98.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 19 Missing cases 1129 OTHRRS94 S2 Other activity, Rep Senate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 13 1.1 100.0 100.0 . 1135 98.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 13 Missing cases 1135 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVIS94 S2 Canvassing, Ind Senate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent . 1148 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 1148 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLRKIS94 S2 Clerical/office, Ind Senate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent . 1148 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 1148 CONVIS94 S2 Tried to convince friends, Ind Senate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 3 .3 100.0 100.0 . 1145 99.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 3 Missing cases 1145 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONIS94 S2 Contributed money, Ind Senate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent . 1148 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 1148 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OTHRIS94 S2 Other activity, Ind Senate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 1 .1 100.0 100.0 . 1147 99.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1 Missing cases 1147 ARMDS94 S3 Gun control, Dem Senate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 115 10.0 36.2 36.2 2 133 11.6 41.8 78.0 3 38 3.3 11.9 89.9 4 10 .9 3.1 93.1 5 10 .9 3.1 96.2 6 3 .3 .9 97.2 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 9 .8 2.8 100.0 . 792 69.0 Missing NOT SURE 8 38 3.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 318 Missing cases 830 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ARMRS94 S3 Gun control, Rep Senate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 10 .9 3.7 3.7 2 19 1.7 7.0 10.6 3 8 .7 2.9 13.6 4 6 .5 2.2 15.8 5 10 .9 3.7 19.4 6 40 3.5 14.7 34.1 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 180 15.7 65.9 100.0 . 847 73.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 28 2.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 273 Missing cases 875 NHIDS94 S3 Natl health ins, Dem Senate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 83 7.2 25.6 25.6 2 146 12.7 45.1 70.7 3 71 6.2 21.9 92.6 4 9 .8 2.8 95.4 5 5 .4 1.5 96.9 6 3 .3 .9 97.8 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 7 .6 2.2 100.0 . 791 68.9 Missing NOT SURE 8 33 2.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 324 Missing cases 824 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NHIRS94 S3 Natl health ins, Rep Senate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 5 .4 1.9 1.9 2 8 .7 3.0 4.9 3 10 .9 3.8 8.7 4 4 .3 1.5 10.3 5 10 .9 3.8 14.1 6 50 4.4 19.0 33.1 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 176 15.3 66.9 100.0 . 851 74.1 Missing NOT SURE 8 34 3.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 263 Missing cases 885 DEFDS94 S3 Reduce deficit/up tax, Dem Senate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 52 4.5 17.4 17.4 2 111 9.7 37.2 54.7 3 68 5.9 22.8 77.5 4 20 1.7 6.7 84.2 5 16 1.4 5.4 89.6 6 19 1.7 6.4 96.0 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 12 1.0 4.0 100.0 . 801 69.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 49 4.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 298 Missing cases 850 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEFRS94 S3 Reduce deficit/up tax, Rep Senate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 24 2.1 10.2 10.2 2 36 3.1 15.3 25.4 3 24 2.1 10.2 35.6 4 10 .9 4.2 39.8 5 16 1.4 6.8 46.6 6 47 4.1 19.9 66.5 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 79 6.9 33.5 100.0 . 860 74.9 Missing NOT SURE 8 52 4.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 236 Missing cases 912 GOV94 S4 Was there also a governors race Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 258 22.5 53.1 53.1 NO 2 228 19.9 46.9 100.0 . 662 57.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 486 Missing cases 662 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GUBVOT94 G1 Vote in gubernatorial election Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE 1 283 24.7 50.1 50.1 REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE 2 268 23.3 47.4 97.5 INDEPENDENT/OTHER 3 4 .3 .7 98.2 DID NOT VOTE 4 10 .9 1.8 100.0 . 583 50.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 565 Missing cases 583 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVDG94 G2 Canvassing, Dem gubernatorial Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 35 3.0 100.0 100.0 . 1113 97.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 35 Missing cases 1113 CLRKDG94 G2 Clerical/office, Dem gubernatorial Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 21 1.8 100.0 100.0 . 1127 98.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 21 Missing cases 1127 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVDG94 G2 Tried to convince friends, Dem gub Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 191 16.6 100.0 100.0 . 957 83.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 191 Missing cases 957 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONDG94 G2 Contributed money, Dem gubernatorial Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 143 12.5 100.0 100.0 . 1005 87.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 143 Missing cases 1005 OTHRDG94 G2 Other activity, Dem gubernatorial Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 90 7.8 100.0 100.0 . 1058 92.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 90 Missing cases 1058 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVRG94 G2 Canvassing, Rep gubernatorial Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 29 2.5 100.0 100.0 . 1119 97.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 29 Missing cases 1119 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLRKRG94 G2 Clerical/office, Rep gubernatorial Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 9 .8 100.0 100.0 . 1139 99.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 9 Missing cases 1139 CONVRG94 G2 Tried to convince friends, Rep gub Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 150 13.1 100.0 100.0 . 998 86.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 150 Missing cases 998 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONRG94 G2 Contributed money, Rep gubernatorial Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 94 8.2 100.0 100.0 . 1054 91.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 94 Missing cases 1054 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OTHRRG94 G2 Other activity, Rep gubernatorial Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 93 8.1 100.0 100.0 . 1055 91.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 93 Missing cases 1055 CANVIG94 G2 Canvassing, Ind gubernatorial Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent . 1148 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 1148 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLRKIG94 G2 Clerical/office, Ind gubernatorial Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent . 1148 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 1148 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVIG94 G2 Tried to convince friends, Ind gub Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 1 .1 100.0 100.0 . 1147 99.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1 Missing cases 1147 MONIG94 G2 Contributed money, Ind gubernatorial Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 1 .1 100.0 100.0 . 1147 99.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1 Missing cases 1147 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OTHRIG94 G2 Other activity, Ind gubernatorial Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 1 .1 100.0 100.0 . 1147 99.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1 Missing cases 1147 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ARMDG94 G3 Position-gun control, Dem gubernatori Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 157 13.7 37.2 37.2 2 180 15.7 42.7 79.9 3 42 3.7 10.0 89.8 4 27 2.4 6.4 96.2 5 4 .3 .9 97.2 6 10 .9 2.4 99.5 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 2 .2 .5 100.0 . 683 59.5 Missing NOT SURE 8 43 3.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 422 Missing cases 726 ARMRG94 G3 Position-gun control, Rep gubernatori Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 21 1.8 5.3 5.3 2 45 3.9 11.3 16.6 3 27 2.4 6.8 23.4 4 27 2.4 6.8 30.2 5 29 2.5 7.3 37.5 6 137 11.9 34.5 72.0 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 111 9.7 28.0 100.0 . 694 60.5 Missing NOT SURE 8 57 5.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 397 Missing cases 751 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TAXDG94 G3 Position-tax concessions, Dem gub Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 36 3.1 9.3 9.3 2 108 9.4 27.8 37.0 3 103 9.0 26.5 63.5 4 47 4.1 12.1 75.6 5 28 2.4 7.2 82.8 6 51 4.4 13.1 95.9 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 16 1.4 4.1 100.0 . 689 60.0 Missing NOT SURE 8 70 6.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 389 Missing cases 759 TAXRG94 G3 Position-tax concessions, Rep gub Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 208 18.1 47.6 47.6 2 176 15.3 40.3 87.9 3 32 2.8 7.3 95.2 4 9 .8 2.1 97.3 5 1 .1 .2 97.5 6 4 .3 .9 98.4 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 7 .6 1.6 100.0 . 679 59.1 Missing NOT SURE 8 32 2.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 437 Missing cases 711 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - POLLDG94 G3 Position-control pollution, Dem gub Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 91 7.9 23.5 23.5 2 186 16.2 48.1 71.6 3 68 5.9 17.6 89.1 4 35 3.0 9.0 98.2 5 2 .2 .5 98.7 6 4 .3 1.0 99.7 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 1 .1 .3 100.0 . 686 59.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 75 6.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 387 Missing cases 761 POLLRG94 G3 Position-control pollution, Rep gub Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 9 .8 2.4 2.4 2 43 3.7 11.4 13.8 3 44 3.8 11.6 25.4 4 66 5.7 17.5 42.9 5 58 5.1 15.3 58.2 6 107 9.3 28.3 86.5 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 51 4.4 13.5 100.0 . 690 60.1 Missing NOT SURE 8 80 7.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 378 Missing cases 770 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PTYHRS94 Q14 Hours per week for camp/party activi Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 321 28.0 39.0 39.0 LESS THAN 2 HOURS 2 324 28.2 39.4 78.4 TWO TO 5 HOURS 3 122 10.6 14.8 93.2 FIVE TO 10 HOURS 4 30 2.6 3.6 96.8 MORE THAN 10 HOURS 5 26 2.3 3.2 100.0 . 325 28.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 823 Missing cases 325 METDH94 Q15 Met candidate personally, Dem hse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 223 19.4 100.0 100.0 . 925 80.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 223 Missing cases 925 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RALDH94 Q15 Attended meeting/rally, Dem hse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 197 17.2 100.0 100.0 . 951 82.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 197 Missing cases 951 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTDH94 Q15 Contacted by staff, Dem hse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 247 21.5 100.0 100.0 . 901 78.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 247 Missing cases 901 MAILDH94 Q15 Received mail, Dem hse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 505 44.0 100.0 100.0 . 643 56.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 505 Missing cases 643 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ADDH94 Q15 Saw/heard ad, Dem hse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 563 49.0 100.0 100.0 . 585 51.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 563 Missing cases 585 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - METRH94 Q15 Met candidate personally, Rep hse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 177 15.4 100.0 100.0 . 971 84.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 177 Missing cases 971 RALRH94 Q15 Attended meeting/rally, Rep hse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 164 14.3 100.0 100.0 . 984 85.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 164 Missing cases 984 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTRH94 Q15 Contacted by staff, Rep hse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 158 13.8 100.0 100.0 . 990 86.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 158 Missing cases 990 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MAILRH94 Q15 Received mail, Rep hse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 453 39.5 100.0 100.0 . 695 60.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 453 Missing cases 695 ADRH94 Q15 Saw/heard ad, Rep hse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 532 46.3 100.0 100.0 . 616 53.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 532 Missing cases 616 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - METIH94 Q15 Met candidate personally, Ind hse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 4 .3 100.0 100.0 . 1144 99.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4 Missing cases 1144 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RALIH94 Q15 Attended meeting/rally, Ind hse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 10 .9 100.0 100.0 . 1138 99.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 10 Missing cases 1138 CONTIH94 Q15 Contacted by staff, Ind hse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 7 .6 100.0 100.0 . 1141 99.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 7 Missing cases 1141 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MAILIH94 Q15 Received mail, Ind hse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 21 1.8 100.0 100.0 . 1127 98.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 21 Missing cases 1127 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ADIH94 Q15 Saw/heard ad, Ind hse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 70 6.1 100.0 100.0 . 1078 93.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 70 Missing cases 1078 INFL94 Q16 Next couple years, most likely to Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent WORK WITHIN THE DEMO 1 299 26.0 36.5 36.5 WORK WITHIN THE REPU 2 182 15.9 22.2 58.7 WORK WITHIN A THIRD 3 12 1.0 1.5 60.2 STAY INVOLVED BUT NO 4 146 12.7 17.8 78.0 NOT BE INVOLVED IN P 5 41 3.6 5.0 83.0 NOT SURE AT THIS TIM 6 139 12.1 17.0 100.0 . 329 28.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 819 Missing cases 329 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TCHNEV94 Q17 Teacher org, not member Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 539 47.0 100.0 100.0 . 609 53.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 539 Missing cases 609 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TCHOLD94 Q17 Teacher org, not active in last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 16 1.4 100.0 100.0 . 1132 98.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 16 Missing cases 1132 TCHPRO94 Q17 Teacher org, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 2 .2 100.0 100.0 . 1146 99.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2 Missing cases 1146 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TCHOTH94 Q17 Teacher org, tried to convince othrs Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 19 1.7 100.0 100.0 . 1129 98.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 19 Missing cases 1129 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TCHPD94 Q17 Teacher org, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 48 4.2 100.0 100.0 . 1100 95.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 48 Missing cases 1100 TCHATT94 Q17 Teacher org, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 30 2.6 100.0 100.0 . 1118 97.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 30 Missing cases 1118 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TCHLDR94 Q17 Teacher org, leadership role Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 18 1.6 100.0 100.0 . 1130 98.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 18 Missing cases 1130 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BUSNEV94 Q17 Business org, not member Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 504 43.9 100.0 100.0 . 644 56.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 504 Missing cases 644 BUSOLD94 Q17 Business org, not active in last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 24 2.1 100.0 100.0 . 1124 97.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 24 Missing cases 1124 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BUSPRO94 Q17 Business org, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent . 1148 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 1148 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BUSOTH94 Q17 Business org, tried to convince othr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 15 1.3 100.0 100.0 . 1133 98.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 15 Missing cases 1133 BUSPD94 Q17 Business org, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 57 5.0 100.0 100.0 . 1091 95.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 57 Missing cases 1091 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BUSATT94 Q17 Business org, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 42 3.7 100.0 100.0 . 1106 96.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 42 Missing cases 1106 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BUSLDR94 Q17 Business org, leadership role Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 30 2.6 100.0 100.0 . 1118 97.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 30 Missing cases 1118 VETNEV94 Q17 Veterans group, not member Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 521 45.4 100.0 100.0 . 627 54.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 521 Missing cases 627 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - VETOLD94 Q17 Veterans group, not active in last y Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 24 2.1 100.0 100.0 . 1124 97.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 24 Missing cases 1124 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - VETPRO94 Q17 Veterans group, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 3 .3 100.0 100.0 . 1145 99.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 3 Missing cases 1145 VETOTH94 Q17 Veterans group, tried to convince ot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 17 1.5 100.0 100.0 . 1131 98.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 17 Missing cases 1131 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - VETPD94 Q17 Veterans group, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 46 4.0 100.0 100.0 . 1102 96.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 46 Missing cases 1102 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - VETATT94 Q17 Veterans group, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 23 2.0 100.0 100.0 . 1125 98.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 23 Missing cases 1125 VETLDR94 Q17 Veterans group, leadership role Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 14 1.2 100.0 100.0 . 1134 98.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 14 Missing cases 1134 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WOMNEV94 Q17 Womens group, not member Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 523 45.6 100.0 100.0 . 625 54.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 523 Missing cases 625 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WOMOLD94 Q17 Womens group, not active in last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 24 2.1 100.0 100.0 . 1124 97.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 24 Missing cases 1124 WOMPRO94 Q17 Womens group, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 10 .9 100.0 100.0 . 1138 99.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 10 Missing cases 1138 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WOMOTH94 Q17 Womens group, tried to convince othr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 8 .7 100.0 100.0 . 1140 99.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 8 Missing cases 1140 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WOMPD94 Q17 Womens group, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 38 3.3 100.0 100.0 . 1110 96.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 38 Missing cases 1110 WOMATT94 Q17 Womens group, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 20 1.7 100.0 100.0 . 1128 98.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 20 Missing cases 1128 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WOMLDR94 Q17 Womens group, leadership role Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 8 .7 100.0 100.0 . 1140 99.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 8 Missing cases 1140 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CIVNEV94 Q17 Civil rights, not member Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 527 45.9 100.0 100.0 . 621 54.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 527 Missing cases 621 CIVOLD94 Q17 Civil rights, not active in last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 22 1.9 100.0 100.0 . 1126 98.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 22 Missing cases 1126 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CIVPRO94 Q17 Civil rights, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 4 .3 100.0 100.0 . 1144 99.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4 Missing cases 1144 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CIVOTH94 Q17 Civil rights, tried to convince othr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 10 .9 100.0 100.0 . 1138 99.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 10 Missing cases 1138 CIVPD94 Q17 Civil rights, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 35 3.0 100.0 100.0 . 1113 97.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 35 Missing cases 1113 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CIVATT94 Q17 Civil rights, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 21 1.8 100.0 100.0 . 1127 98.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 21 Missing cases 1127 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CIVLDR94 Q17 Civil rights, leadership role Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 11 1.0 100.0 100.0 . 1137 99.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 11 Missing cases 1137 ENVNEV94 Q17 Environ group, not member Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 477 41.6 100.0 100.0 . 671 58.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 477 Missing cases 671 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ENVOLD94 Q17 Environ group, not active in last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 45 3.9 100.0 100.0 . 1103 96.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 45 Missing cases 1103 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ENVPRO94 Q17 Environ group, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 4 .3 100.0 100.0 . 1144 99.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4 Missing cases 1144 ENVOTH94 Q17 Environ group, tried to convince oth Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 11 1.0 100.0 100.0 . 1137 99.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 11 Missing cases 1137 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ENVPD94 Q17 Environ group, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 79 6.9 100.0 100.0 . 1069 93.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 79 Missing cases 1069 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ENVATT94 Q17 Environ group, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 25 2.2 100.0 100.0 . 1123 97.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 25 Missing cases 1123 ENVLDR94 Q17 Environ group, leadership role Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 9 .8 100.0 100.0 . 1139 99.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 9 Missing cases 1139 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INTNEV94 Q17 Interest groups, not member Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 482 42.0 100.0 100.0 . 666 58.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 482 Missing cases 666 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INTOLD94 Q17 Interest groups, not active in last Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 30 2.6 100.0 100.0 . 1118 97.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 30 Missing cases 1118 INTPRO94 Q17 Interest groups, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 4 .3 100.0 100.0 . 1144 99.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4 Missing cases 1144 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INTOTH94 Q17 Interest groups, tried to convince o Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 18 1.6 100.0 100.0 . 1130 98.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 18 Missing cases 1130 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INTPD94 Q17 Interest groups, paid membership due Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 65 5.7 100.0 100.0 . 1083 94.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 65 Missing cases 1083 INTATT94 Q17 Interest groups, attend group meetin Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 36 3.1 100.0 100.0 . 1112 96.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 36 Missing cases 1112 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INTLDR94 Q17 Interest groups, leadership role Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 20 1.7 100.0 100.0 . 1128 98.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 20 Missing cases 1128 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LABNEV94 Q17 Labor Union, not member Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 506 44.1 100.0 100.0 . 642 55.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 506 Missing cases 642 LABOLD94 Q17 Labor Union, not active in last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 19 1.7 100.0 100.0 . 1129 98.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 19 Missing cases 1129 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LABPRO94 Q17 Labor Union, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 20 1.7 100.0 100.0 . 1128 98.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 20 Missing cases 1128 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LABOTH94 Q17 Labor Union, tried to convince othrs Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 20 1.7 100.0 100.0 . 1128 98.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 20 Missing cases 1128 LABPD94 Q17 Labor Union, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 51 4.4 100.0 100.0 . 1097 95.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 51 Missing cases 1097 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LABATT94 Q17 Labor Union, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 43 3.7 100.0 100.0 . 1105 96.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 43 Missing cases 1105 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LABLDR94 Q17 Labor Union, leadership role Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 25 2.2 100.0 100.0 . 1123 97.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 25 Missing cases 1123 FRMNEV94 Q17 Farm org, not member Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 502 43.7 100.0 100.0 . 646 56.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 502 Missing cases 646 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FRMOLD94 Q17 Farm org, not active in last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 41 3.6 100.0 100.0 . 1107 96.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 41 Missing cases 1107 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FRMPRO94 Q17 Farm org, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 4 .3 100.0 100.0 . 1144 99.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4 Missing cases 1144 FRMOTH94 Q17 Farm org, tried to convince othrs Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 18 1.6 100.0 100.0 . 1130 98.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 18 Missing cases 1130 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FRMPD94 Q17 Farm org, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 72 6.3 100.0 100.0 . 1076 93.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 72 Missing cases 1076 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FRMATT94 Q17 Farm org, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 36 3.1 100.0 100.0 . 1112 96.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 36 Missing cases 1112 FRMLDR94 Q17 Farm org, leadership role Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 16 1.4 100.0 100.0 . 1132 98.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 16 Missing cases 1132 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - JESNEV94 Q17 Evangelical, not member Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 527 45.9 100.0 100.0 . 621 54.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 527 Missing cases 621 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - JESOLD94 Q17 Evangelical, not active in last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 22 1.9 100.0 100.0 . 1126 98.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 22 Missing cases 1126 JESPRO94 Q17 Evangelical, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 4 .3 100.0 100.0 . 1144 99.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4 Missing cases 1144 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - JESOTH94 Q17 Evangelical, tried to convince othrs Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 9 .8 100.0 100.0 . 1139 99.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 9 Missing cases 1139 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - JESPD94 Q17 Evangelical, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 22 1.9 100.0 100.0 . 1126 98.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 22 Missing cases 1126 JESATT94 Q17 Evangelical, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 21 1.8 100.0 100.0 . 1127 98.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 21 Missing cases 1127 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - JESLDR94 Q17 Evangelical, leadership role Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 6 .5 100.0 100.0 . 1142 99.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 6 Missing cases 1142 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABNEV94 Q17 Anti-abortion, not member Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 515 44.9 100.0 100.0 . 633 55.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 515 Missing cases 633 ABOLD94 Q17 Anti-abortion, not active in last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 32 2.8 100.0 100.0 . 1116 97.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 32 Missing cases 1116 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABPRO94 Q17 Anti-abortion, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 21 1.8 100.0 100.0 . 1127 98.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 21 Missing cases 1127 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABOTH94 Q17 Anti-abortion, tried to convince oth Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 20 1.7 100.0 100.0 . 1128 98.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 20 Missing cases 1128 ABPD94 Q17 Anti-abortion, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 37 3.2 100.0 100.0 . 1111 96.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 37 Missing cases 1111 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABATT94 Q17 Anti-abortion, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 26 2.3 100.0 100.0 . 1122 97.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 26 Missing cases 1122 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABLDR94 Q17 Anti-abortion, leadership role Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 13 1.1 100.0 100.0 . 1135 98.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 13 Missing cases 1135 LIBNEV94 Q17 Liberal ideol, not member Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 505 44.0 100.0 100.0 . 643 56.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 505 Missing cases 643 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LIBOLD94 Q17 Liberal ideol, not active in last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 25 2.2 100.0 100.0 . 1123 97.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 25 Missing cases 1123 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LIBPRO94 Q17 Liberal ideol, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 4 .3 100.0 100.0 . 1144 99.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4 Missing cases 1144 LIBOTH94 Q17 Liberal ideol, tried to convince oth Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 14 1.2 100.0 100.0 . 1134 98.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 14 Missing cases 1134 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LIBPD94 Q17 Liberal ideol, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 48 4.2 100.0 100.0 . 1100 95.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 48 Missing cases 1100 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LIBATT94 Q17 Liberal ideol, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 23 2.0 100.0 100.0 . 1125 98.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 23 Missing cases 1125 LIBLDR94 Q17 Liberal ideol, leadership role Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 7 .6 100.0 100.0 . 1141 99.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 7 Missing cases 1141 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONNEV94 Q17 Cons ideol, not member Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 534 46.5 100.0 100.0 . 614 53.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 534 Missing cases 614 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONOLD94 Q17 Cons ideol, not active in last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 9 .8 100.0 100.0 . 1139 99.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 9 Missing cases 1139 CONPRO94 Q17 Cons ideol, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent . 1148 100.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 0 Missing cases 1148 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONOTH94 Q17 Cons ideol, tried to convince othrs Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 7 .6 100.0 100.0 . 1141 99.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 7 Missing cases 1141 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONPD94 Q17 Cons ideol, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 18 1.6 100.0 100.0 . 1130 98.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 18 Missing cases 1130 CONATT94 Q17 Cons ideol, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 13 1.1 100.0 100.0 . 1135 98.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 13 Missing cases 1135 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONLDR94 Q17 Cons ideol, leadership role Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 5 .4 100.0 100.0 . 1143 99.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 5 Missing cases 1143 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NABNEV94 Q17 Neighborhood, not member Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 495 43.1 100.0 100.0 . 653 56.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 495 Missing cases 653 NABOLD94 Q17 Neighborhood, not active in last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 40 3.5 100.0 100.0 . 1108 96.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 40 Missing cases 1108 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NABPRO94 Q17 Neighborhood, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 5 .4 100.0 100.0 . 1143 99.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 5 Missing cases 1143 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NABOTH94 Q17 Neighborhood, tried to convince othr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 13 1.1 100.0 100.0 . 1135 98.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 13 Missing cases 1135 NABPD94 Q17 Neighborhood, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 13 1.1 100.0 100.0 . 1135 98.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 13 Missing cases 1135 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NABATT94 Q17 Neighborhood, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 39 3.4 100.0 100.0 . 1109 96.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 39 Missing cases 1109 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NABLDR94 Q17 Neighborhood, leadership role Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 10 .9 100.0 100.0 . 1138 99.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 10 Missing cases 1138 EDNEV94 Q17 Educational, not member Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 468 40.8 100.0 100.0 . 680 59.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 468 Missing cases 680 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EDOLD94 Q17 Educational, not active in last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 35 3.0 100.0 100.0 . 1113 97.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 35 Missing cases 1113 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EDPRO94 Q17 Educational, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 3 .3 100.0 100.0 . 1145 99.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 3 Missing cases 1145 EDOTH94 Q17 Educational, tried to convince othrs Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 17 1.5 100.0 100.0 . 1131 98.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 17 Missing cases 1131 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EDPD94 Q17 Educational, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 62 5.4 100.0 100.0 . 1086 94.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 62 Missing cases 1086 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EDATT94 Q17 Educational, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 67 5.8 100.0 100.0 . 1081 94.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 67 Missing cases 1081 EDLDR94 Q17 Educational, leadership role Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 28 2.4 100.0 100.0 . 1120 97.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 28 Missing cases 1120 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - UWSNEV94 Q17 United We Stand, not member Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 556 48.4 100.0 100.0 . 592 51.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 556 Missing cases 592 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - UWSOLD94 Q17 United We Stand, not active in last Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 6 .5 100.0 100.0 . 1142 99.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 6 Missing cases 1142 UWSPRO94 Q17 United We Stand, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 1 .1 100.0 100.0 . 1147 99.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1 Missing cases 1147 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - UWSOTH94 Q17 United We Stand, tried to convince o Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 2 .2 100.0 100.0 . 1146 99.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 2 Missing cases 1146 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - UWSPD94 Q17 United We Stand, paid membership due Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 5 .4 100.0 100.0 . 1143 99.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 5 Missing cases 1143 UWSATT94 Q17 United We Stand, attend group meetin Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 6 .5 100.0 100.0 . 1142 99.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 6 Missing cases 1142 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - UWSLDR94 Q17 United We Stand, leadership role Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 1 .1 100.0 100.0 . 1147 99.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1 Missing cases 1147 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CHUNEV94 Q17 Church, not member Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 281 24.5 100.0 100.0 . 867 75.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 281 Missing cases 867 CHUOLD94 Q17 Church, not active in last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 87 7.6 100.0 100.0 . 1061 92.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 87 Missing cases 1061 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CHUPRO94 Q17 Church, joined protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 11 1.0 100.0 100.0 . 1137 99.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 11 Missing cases 1137 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CHUOTH94 Q17 Church, tried to convince othrs Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 63 5.5 100.0 100.0 . 1085 94.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 63 Missing cases 1085 CHUPD94 Q17 Church, paid membership dues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 125 10.9 100.0 100.0 . 1023 89.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 125 Missing cases 1023 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CHUATT94 Q17 Church, attend group meeting Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 217 18.9 100.0 100.0 . 931 81.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 217 Missing cases 931 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CHULDR94 Q17 Church, leadership role Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 157 13.7 100.0 100.0 . 991 86.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 157 Missing cases 991 LDPFRD94 Q18 Friends in local Democratic party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 174 15.2 24.8 24.8 ONE OR TWO 2 158 13.8 22.5 47.3 THREE OR MORE 3 370 32.2 52.7 100.0 . 399 34.8 Missing NOT SURE 4 47 4.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 702 Missing cases 446 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LRPFRD94 Q18 Friends in local Republican party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 232 20.2 37.1 37.1 ONE OR TWO 2 123 10.7 19.6 56.7 THREE OR MORE 3 271 23.6 43.3 100.0 . 456 39.7 Missing NOT SURE 4 66 5.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 626 Missing cases 522 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - UWSFRD94 Q18 Friends in United We Stand, America Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 458 39.9 91.8 91.8 ONE OR TWO 2 34 3.0 6.8 98.6 THREE OR MORE 3 7 .6 1.4 100.0 . 548 47.7 Missing NOT SURE 4 101 8.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 499 Missing cases 649 VETFRD94 Q18 Friends in Veterans groups Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 308 26.8 52.7 52.7 ONE OR TWO 2 107 9.3 18.3 71.1 THREE OR MORE 3 169 14.7 28.9 100.0 . 489 42.6 Missing NOT SURE 4 75 6.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 584 Missing cases 564 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WOMFRD94 Q18 Friends in Womens rights groups Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 338 29.4 62.1 62.1 ONE OR TWO 2 109 9.5 20.0 82.2 THREE OR MORE 3 97 8.4 17.8 100.0 . 525 45.7 Missing NOT SURE 4 79 6.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 544 Missing cases 604 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CIVFRD94 Q18 Friends in Civil rights groups Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 375 32.7 69.7 69.7 ONE OR TWO 2 78 6.8 14.5 84.2 THREE OR MORE 3 85 7.4 15.8 100.0 . 531 46.3 Missing NOT SURE 4 79 6.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 538 Missing cases 610 ENVFRD94 Q18 Friends in environmental groups Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 325 28.3 57.5 57.5 ONE OR TWO 2 139 12.1 24.6 82.1 THREE OR MORE 3 101 8.8 17.9 100.0 . 515 44.9 Missing NOT SURE 4 68 5.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 565 Missing cases 583 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INTFRD94 Q18 Friends in interest groups Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 303 26.4 56.2 56.2 ONE OR TWO 2 114 9.9 21.2 77.4 THREE OR MORE 3 122 10.6 22.6 100.0 . 526 45.8 Missing NOT SURE 4 83 7.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 539 Missing cases 609 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - JESFRD94 Q18 Friends in evangelical groups Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 404 35.2 74.7 74.7 ONE OR TWO 2 58 5.1 10.7 85.4 THREE OR MORE 3 79 6.9 14.6 100.0 . 528 46.0 Missing NOT SURE 4 79 6.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 541 Missing cases 607 ABFRD94 Q18 Friends in anti-abortion groups Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 369 32.1 65.8 65.8 ONE OR TWO 2 89 7.8 15.9 81.6 THREE OR MORE 3 103 9.0 18.4 100.0 . 514 44.8 Missing NOT SURE 4 73 6.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 561 Missing cases 587 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LIBFRD94 Q18 Friends in lib ideological groups Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 349 30.4 67.8 67.8 ONE OR TWO 2 71 6.2 13.8 81.6 THREE OR MORE 3 95 8.3 18.4 100.0 . 537 46.8 Missing NOT SURE 4 96 8.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 515 Missing cases 633 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONFRD94 Q18 Friends in cons ideological groups Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 381 33.2 73.7 73.7 ONE OR TWO 2 69 6.0 13.3 87.0 THREE OR MORE 3 67 5.8 13.0 100.0 . 536 46.7 Missing NOT SURE 4 95 8.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 517 Missing cases 631 NABFRD94 Q18 Friends in crime/neighborhood groups Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 324 28.2 61.5 61.5 ONE OR TWO 2 93 8.1 17.6 79.1 THREE OR MORE 3 110 9.6 20.9 100.0 . 523 45.6 Missing NOT SURE 4 98 8.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 527 Missing cases 621 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EDFRD94 Q18 Friends in educational groups Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 211 18.4 35.5 35.5 ONE OR TWO 2 125 10.9 21.0 56.5 THREE OR MORE 3 259 22.6 43.5 100.0 . 493 42.9 Missing NOT SURE 4 60 5.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 595 Missing cases 553 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CHUFRD94 Q18 Friends in church groups Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 111 9.7 16.5 16.5 ONE OR TWO 2 118 10.3 17.6 34.1 THREE OR MORE 3 442 38.5 65.9 100.0 . 429 37.4 Missing NOT SURE 4 48 4.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 671 Missing cases 477 NECON94 Q19 Rate national economy Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUCH WORSE 1 21 1.8 2.5 2.5 2 112 9.8 13.5 16.0 3 215 18.7 25.9 42.0 4 358 31.2 43.2 85.2 MUCH BETTER 5 123 10.7 14.8 100.0 . 319 27.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 829 Missing cases 319 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PECON94 Q19 Rate family financial situation Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUCH WORSE 1 25 2.2 3.1 3.1 2 125 10.9 15.3 18.3 3 394 34.3 48.2 66.5 4 221 19.3 27.0 93.5 MUCH BETTER 5 53 4.6 6.5 100.0 . 330 28.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 818 Missing cases 330 SECON94 Q19 Rate state economy Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUCH WORSE 1 19 1.7 2.3 2.3 2 97 8.4 11.9 14.2 3 294 25.6 36.1 50.3 4 337 29.4 41.3 91.7 MUCH BETTER 5 68 5.9 8.3 100.0 . 333 29.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 815 Missing cases 333 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FNECON94 Q20 Rate future national economy Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUCH WORSE 1 37 3.2 4.5 4.5 2 151 13.2 18.3 22.8 3 290 25.3 35.2 57.9 4 299 26.0 36.2 94.2 MUCH BETTER 5 48 4.2 5.8 100.0 . 323 28.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 825 Missing cases 323 FPECON94 Q20 Rate future family financial situati Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUCH WORSE 1 18 1.6 2.2 2.2 2 102 8.9 12.4 14.6 3 450 39.2 54.9 69.5 4 214 18.6 26.1 95.6 MUCH BETTER 5 36 3.1 4.4 100.0 . 328 28.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 820 Missing cases 328 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FSECON94 Q20 Rate future state economy Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUCH WORSE 1 28 2.4 3.4 3.4 2 129 11.2 15.8 19.3 3 367 32.0 45.0 64.3 4 262 22.8 32.1 96.4 MUCH BETTER 5 29 2.5 3.6 100.0 . 333 29.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 815 Missing cases 333 PTYM94 Q21 Partisanship, mother Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACTIVE DEMOCRAT 1 117 10.2 23.4 23.4 INACTIVE DEMOCRAT 2 138 12.0 27.6 51.0 ACTIVE REPUBLICAN 3 80 7.0 16.0 67.0 INACTIVE REPUBLICAN 4 121 10.5 24.2 91.2 ACTIVE INDEPENDENT 5 10 .9 2.0 93.2 INACTIVE INDEPENDENT 6 34 3.0 6.8 100.0 . 596 51.9 Missing NOT SURE 7 52 4.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 500 Missing cases 648 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PTYF94 Q21 Partisanship, father Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACTIVE DEMOCRAT 1 87 7.6 20.1 20.1 INACTIVE DEMOCRAT 2 121 10.5 28.0 48.1 ACTIVE REPUBLICAN 3 76 6.6 17.6 65.7 INACTIVE REPUBLICAN 4 108 9.4 25.0 90.7 ACTIVE INDEPENDENT 5 11 1.0 2.5 93.3 INACTIVE INDEPENDENT 6 29 2.5 6.7 100.0 . 667 58.1 Missing NOT SURE 7 49 4.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 432 Missing cases 716 PTYSP94 Q21 Partisanship, spouse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACTIVE DEMOCRAT 1 231 20.1 36.0 36.0 INACTIVE DEMOCRAT 2 131 11.4 20.4 56.4 ACTIVE REPUBLICAN 3 126 11.0 19.6 76.0 INACTIVE REPUBLICAN 4 93 8.1 14.5 90.5 ACTIVE INDEPENDENT 5 14 1.2 2.2 92.7 INACTIVE INDEPENDENT 6 47 4.1 7.3 100.0 . 487 42.4 Missing NOT SURE 7 19 1.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 642 Missing cases 506 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABORT94 Q22a Opinion-amendment banning abortion Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 132 11.5 16.2 16.2 2 58 5.1 7.1 23.3 3 39 3.4 4.8 28.1 4 39 3.4 4.8 32.8 5 16 1.4 2.0 34.8 6 103 9.0 12.6 47.4 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 429 37.4 52.6 100.0 . 316 27.5 Missing NOT SURE 8 16 1.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 816 Missing cases 332 IMPORT94 Q22b Opinion-limits on foreign imports Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 91 7.9 11.7 11.7 2 122 10.6 15.6 27.3 3 118 10.3 15.1 42.4 4 84 7.3 10.8 53.1 5 85 7.4 10.9 64.0 6 156 13.6 20.0 84.0 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 125 10.9 16.0 100.0 . 321 28.0 Missing NOT SURE 8 46 4.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 781 Missing cases 367 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AFFACT94 Q22c Opinion-affirmative action Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 60 5.2 7.4 7.4 2 131 11.4 16.2 23.6 3 114 9.9 14.1 37.7 4 140 12.2 17.3 55.0 5 95 8.3 11.7 66.7 6 125 10.9 15.5 82.2 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 144 12.5 17.8 100.0 . 322 28.0 Missing NOT SURE 8 17 1.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 809 Missing cases 339 POLLUT94 Q22d Opinion-gov regulation on pollution Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 184 16.0 22.4 22.4 2 194 16.9 23.7 46.1 3 145 12.6 17.7 63.8 4 71 6.2 8.7 72.4 5 62 5.4 7.6 80.0 6 85 7.4 10.4 90.4 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 79 6.9 9.6 100.0 . 318 27.7 Missing NOT SURE 8 10 .9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 820 Missing cases 328 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INVOL94 Q22e Opinion-decrease US involvement Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 76 6.6 9.4 9.4 2 151 13.2 18.7 28.1 3 164 14.3 20.3 48.3 4 118 10.3 14.6 62.9 5 101 8.8 12.5 75.4 6 112 9.8 13.8 89.2 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 87 7.6 10.8 100.0 . 319 27.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 20 1.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 809 Missing cases 339 HOMO94 Q22f Opinion-homosexuals in military Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 117 10.2 14.3 14.3 2 176 15.3 21.5 35.9 3 48 4.2 5.9 41.7 4 172 15.0 21.1 62.8 5 38 3.3 4.7 67.4 6 70 6.1 8.6 76.0 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 196 17.1 24.0 100.0 . 312 27.2 Missing NOT SURE 8 19 1.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 817 Missing cases 331 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ARM94 Q22g Opinion-gun control Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 331 28.8 40.2 40.2 2 153 13.3 18.6 58.7 3 78 6.8 9.5 68.2 4 36 3.1 4.4 72.6 5 25 2.2 3.0 75.6 6 81 7.1 9.8 85.4 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 120 10.5 14.6 100.0 . 315 27.4 Missing NOT SURE 8 9 .8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 824 Missing cases 324 TERM94 Q22h Opinion-term limits Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 200 17.4 24.3 24.3 2 143 12.5 17.4 41.7 3 88 7.7 10.7 52.4 4 76 6.6 9.2 61.6 5 63 5.5 7.7 69.3 6 108 9.4 13.1 82.4 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 145 12.6 17.6 100.0 . 312 27.2 Missing NOT SURE 8 13 1.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 823 Missing cases 325 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEFTX94 Q22i Opinion-reduce deficit/increase tax Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 137 11.9 17.1 17.1 2 221 19.3 27.7 44.8 3 172 15.0 21.5 66.3 4 56 4.9 7.0 73.3 5 61 5.3 7.6 81.0 6 88 7.7 11.0 92.0 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 64 5.6 8.0 100.0 . 316 27.5 Missing NOT SURE 8 33 2.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 799 Missing cases 349 NHI94 Q22j Opinion-national health insurance Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 214 18.6 26.4 26.4 2 159 13.9 19.6 45.9 3 89 7.8 11.0 56.9 4 54 4.7 6.7 63.5 5 33 2.9 4.1 67.6 6 75 6.5 9.2 76.8 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 188 16.4 23.2 100.0 . 318 27.7 Missing NOT SURE 8 18 1.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 812 Missing cases 336 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TAX94 Q22k Opinion-make tax concessions Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 56 4.9 7.0 7.0 2 159 13.9 19.9 26.8 3 190 16.6 23.7 50.6 4 133 11.6 16.6 67.2 5 97 8.4 12.1 79.3 6 99 8.6 12.4 91.6 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 67 5.8 8.4 100.0 . 319 27.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 28 2.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 801 Missing cases 347 DEFGP94 Q22l Opinion-reduce deficit/cut programs Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 169 14.7 21.0 21.0 2 221 19.3 27.4 48.4 3 160 13.9 19.9 68.2 4 59 5.1 7.3 75.6 5 61 5.3 7.6 83.1 6 90 7.8 11.2 94.3 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 46 4.0 5.7 100.0 . 320 27.9 Missing NOT SURE 8 22 1.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 806 Missing cases 342 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEATH94 Q22m Opinion-death penalty Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 150 13.1 18.8 18.8 2 94 8.2 11.8 30.6 3 36 3.1 4.5 35.1 4 74 6.4 9.3 44.4 5 55 4.8 6.9 51.3 6 145 12.6 18.2 69.4 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 244 21.3 30.6 100.0 . 318 27.7 Missing NOT SURE 8 32 2.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 798 Missing cases 350 MIISS94 Q23 Most important issue Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ABORTION AMENDMENT 1 140 12.2 17.9 17.9 LIMIT FOREIGN IMPORT 2 23 2.0 2.9 20.9 AFFIRMATIVE ACTION 3 14 1.2 1.8 22.7 CONTROL POLLUTION 4 51 4.4 6.5 29.2 DECREASE US INVOLVEM 5 19 1.7 2.4 31.7 HOMOSEXUALS IN MILIT 6 8 .7 1.0 32.7 GUN CONTROL 7 70 6.1 9.0 41.7 TERM LIMITS 8 33 2.9 4.2 45.9 REDUCE DEFICIT/UP TA 9 96 8.4 12.3 58.2 NATL HEALTH INS 10 162 14.1 20.8 79.0 TAX CONCESSIONS 11 11 1.0 1.4 80.4 REDUCE DEFICIT/CUT P 12 125 10.9 16.0 96.4 DEATH PENALTY 13 28 2.4 3.6 100.0 . 329 28.7 Missing NOT SURE 14 39 3.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 780 Missing cases 368 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EFFDP94 Q24 Effectiveness of Dem party in CD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY EFFECTIVE 1 152 13.2 21.3 21.3 2 288 25.1 40.3 61.6 3 208 18.1 29.1 90.8 NOT AT ALL EFFECTIVE 4 66 5.7 9.2 100.0 . 371 32.3 Missing NOT SURE 5 63 5.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 714 Missing cases 434 EFFRP94 Q24 Effectiveness of Rep party in CD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY EFFECTIVE 1 179 15.6 26.1 26.1 2 341 29.7 49.7 75.8 3 131 11.4 19.1 94.9 NOT AT ALL EFFECTIVE 4 35 3.0 5.1 100.0 . 389 33.9 Missing NOT SURE 5 73 6.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 686 Missing cases 462 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EFFUWS94 Q24 Effectiveness of United We Stand in Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY EFFECTIVE 1 2 .2 .7 .7 2 28 2.4 9.4 10.1 3 51 4.4 17.1 27.2 NOT AT ALL EFFECTIVE 4 217 18.9 72.8 100.0 . 486 42.3 Missing NOT SURE 5 364 31.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 298 Missing cases 850 ARMBC94 Q25 Gun control, Bill Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 299 26.0 40.1 40.1 2 315 27.4 42.2 82.3 3 86 7.5 11.5 93.8 4 21 1.8 2.8 96.6 5 6 .5 .8 97.5 6 12 1.0 1.6 99.1 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 7 .6 .9 100.0 . 365 31.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 37 3.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 746 Missing cases 402 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ARMHRP94 Q25 Gun control, H Ross Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 10 .9 2.4 2.4 2 62 5.4 14.7 17.0 3 66 5.7 15.6 32.6 4 46 4.0 10.9 43.5 5 35 3.0 8.3 51.8 6 121 10.5 28.6 80.4 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 83 7.2 19.6 100.0 . 399 34.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 326 28.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 423 Missing cases 725 ARMBD94 Q25 Gun control, Bob Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 9 .8 1.4 1.4 2 27 2.4 4.3 5.7 3 32 2.8 5.1 10.8 4 26 2.3 4.1 15.0 5 83 7.2 13.2 28.2 6 271 23.6 43.2 71.5 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 179 15.6 28.5 100.0 . 388 33.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 133 11.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 627 Missing cases 521 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ARMDP94 Q25 Gun control, Dem party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 215 18.7 30.4 30.4 2 313 27.3 44.3 74.7 3 123 10.7 17.4 92.1 4 23 2.0 3.3 95.3 5 11 1.0 1.6 96.9 6 11 1.0 1.6 98.4 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 11 1.0 1.6 100.0 . 389 33.9 Missing NOT SURE 8 52 4.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 707 Missing cases 441 ARMRP94 Q25 Gun control, Rep party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 10 .9 1.5 1.5 2 34 3.0 5.0 6.5 3 18 1.6 2.6 9.1 4 28 2.4 4.1 13.2 5 71 6.2 10.4 23.6 6 283 24.7 41.5 65.1 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 238 20.7 34.9 100.0 . 392 34.1 Missing NOT SURE 8 74 6.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 682 Missing cases 466 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ARMDH94 Q25 Gun control, Dem hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 175 15.2 28.5 28.5 2 250 21.8 40.7 69.1 3 97 8.4 15.8 84.9 4 31 2.7 5.0 89.9 5 20 1.7 3.3 93.2 6 21 1.8 3.4 96.6 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 21 1.8 3.4 100.0 . 417 36.3 Missing NOT SURE 8 116 10.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 615 Missing cases 533 ARMRH94 Q25 Gun control, Rep hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 15 1.3 2.5 2.5 2 57 5.0 9.4 11.9 3 37 3.2 6.1 18.0 4 21 1.8 3.5 21.4 5 59 5.1 9.7 31.1 6 208 18.1 34.3 65.4 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 210 18.3 34.6 100.0 . 388 33.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 153 13.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 607 Missing cases 541 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NHIBC94 Q25 Natl health ins, Bill Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 628 54.7 79.7 79.7 2 115 10.0 14.6 94.3 3 16 1.4 2.0 96.3 4 6 .5 .8 97.1 5 3 .3 .4 97.5 6 6 .5 .8 98.2 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 14 1.2 1.8 100.0 . 349 30.4 Missing NOT SURE 8 11 1.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 788 Missing cases 360 NHIHRP94 Q25 Natl health ins, H Ross Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 11 1.0 2.6 2.6 2 34 3.0 7.9 10.5 3 47 4.1 11.0 21.4 4 35 3.0 8.2 29.6 5 41 3.6 9.6 39.2 6 119 10.4 27.7 66.9 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 142 12.4 33.1 100.0 . 395 34.4 Missing NOT SURE 8 324 28.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 429 Missing cases 719 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NHIBD94 Q25 Natl health ins, Bob Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 5 .4 .7 .7 2 18 1.6 2.6 3.4 3 64 5.6 9.3 12.7 4 17 1.5 2.5 15.2 5 82 7.1 12.0 27.1 6 229 19.9 33.4 60.5 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 271 23.6 39.5 100.0 . 381 33.2 Missing NOT SURE 8 81 7.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 686 Missing cases 462 NHIDP94 Q25 Natl health ins, Dem party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 251 21.9 33.8 33.8 2 332 28.9 44.7 78.6 3 122 10.6 16.4 95.0 4 7 .6 .9 96.0 5 10 .9 1.3 97.3 6 9 .8 1.2 98.5 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 11 1.0 1.5 100.0 . 375 32.7 Missing NOT SURE 8 31 2.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 742 Missing cases 406 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NHIRP94 Q25 Natl health ins, Rep party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 3 .3 .4 .4 2 15 1.3 2.1 2.5 3 50 4.4 7.0 9.6 4 22 1.9 3.1 12.7 5 71 6.2 10.0 22.6 6 252 22.0 35.4 58.1 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 298 26.0 41.9 100.0 . 384 33.4 Missing NOT SURE 8 53 4.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 711 Missing cases 437 NHIDH94 Q25 Natl health ins, Dem hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 210 18.3 33.4 33.4 2 262 22.8 41.7 75.2 3 110 9.6 17.5 92.7 4 15 1.3 2.4 95.1 5 7 .6 1.1 96.2 6 7 .6 1.1 97.3 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 17 1.5 2.7 100.0 . 417 36.3 Missing NOT SURE 8 103 9.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 628 Missing cases 520 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NHIRH94 Q25 Natl health ins, Rep hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 4 .3 .6 .6 2 18 1.6 2.9 3.5 3 44 3.8 7.0 10.5 4 21 1.8 3.3 13.9 5 53 4.6 8.5 22.3 6 202 17.6 32.2 54.5 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 285 24.8 45.5 100.0 . 393 34.2 Missing NOT SURE 8 128 11.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 627 Missing cases 521 DEFBC94 Q25 Budget deficit, Bill Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 123 10.7 17.7 17.7 2 214 18.6 30.8 48.5 3 168 14.6 24.2 72.7 4 35 3.0 5.0 77.7 5 41 3.6 5.9 83.6 6 69 6.0 9.9 93.5 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 45 3.9 6.5 100.0 . 387 33.7 Missing NOT SURE 8 66 5.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 695 Missing cases 453 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEFHRP94 Q25 Budget deficit, H Ross Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 102 8.9 20.6 20.6 2 155 13.5 31.4 52.0 3 79 6.9 16.0 68.0 4 18 1.6 3.6 71.7 5 24 2.1 4.9 76.5 6 54 4.7 10.9 87.4 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 62 5.4 12.6 100.0 . 404 35.2 Missing NOT SURE 8 250 21.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 494 Missing cases 654 DEFBD94 Q25 Budget deficit, Bob Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 56 4.9 9.3 9.3 2 88 7.7 14.5 23.8 3 70 6.1 11.6 35.4 4 36 3.1 6.0 41.3 5 73 6.4 12.1 53.4 6 150 13.1 24.8 78.2 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 132 11.5 21.8 100.0 . 398 34.7 Missing NOT SURE 8 145 12.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 605 Missing cases 543 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEFDP94 Q25 Budget deficit, Dem party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 84 7.3 12.9 12.9 2 156 13.6 24.0 36.9 3 181 15.8 27.8 64.7 4 45 3.9 6.9 71.6 5 67 5.8 10.3 81.9 6 73 6.4 11.2 93.1 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 45 3.9 6.9 100.0 . 405 35.3 Missing NOT SURE 8 92 8.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 651 Missing cases 497 DEFRP94 Q25 Budget deficit, Rep party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 57 5.0 8.9 8.9 2 90 7.8 14.0 22.9 3 65 5.7 10.1 33.0 4 34 3.0 5.3 38.3 5 76 6.6 11.8 50.2 6 151 13.2 23.5 73.7 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 169 14.7 26.3 100.0 . 403 35.1 Missing NOT SURE 8 103 9.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 642 Missing cases 506 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEFDH94 Q25 Budget deficit, Dem hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 72 6.3 13.1 13.1 2 131 11.4 23.8 36.8 3 157 13.7 28.5 65.3 4 42 3.7 7.6 73.0 5 48 4.2 8.7 81.7 6 62 5.4 11.3 92.9 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 39 3.4 7.1 100.0 . 436 38.0 Missing NOT SURE 8 161 14.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 551 Missing cases 597 DEFRH94 Q25 Budget deficit, Rep hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 55 4.8 9.6 9.6 2 83 7.2 14.4 24.0 3 59 5.1 10.3 34.3 4 26 2.3 4.5 38.8 5 47 4.1 8.2 47.0 6 156 13.6 27.1 74.1 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 149 13.0 25.9 100.0 . 409 35.6 Missing NOT SURE 8 164 14.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 575 Missing cases 573 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMPBC94 Q25 Limit foreign import, Bill Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 56 4.9 9.2 9.2 2 90 7.8 14.8 24.1 3 93 8.1 15.3 39.4 4 45 3.9 7.4 46.8 5 70 6.1 11.5 58.3 6 152 13.2 25.0 83.4 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 101 8.8 16.6 100.0 . 397 34.6 Missing NOT SURE 8 144 12.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 607 Missing cases 541 IMPHRP94 Q25 Limit foreign import, H Ross Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 169 14.7 34.3 34.3 2 167 14.5 33.9 68.3 3 54 4.7 11.0 79.3 4 15 1.3 3.0 82.3 5 19 1.7 3.9 86.2 6 28 2.4 5.7 91.9 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 40 3.5 8.1 100.0 . 412 35.9 Missing NOT SURE 8 244 21.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 492 Missing cases 656 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMPBD94 Q25 Limit foreign import, Bob Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 24 2.1 4.7 4.7 2 81 7.1 15.9 20.6 3 81 7.1 15.9 36.5 4 49 4.3 9.6 46.1 5 59 5.1 11.6 57.6 6 138 12.0 27.1 84.7 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 78 6.8 15.3 100.0 . 412 35.9 Missing NOT SURE 8 226 19.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 510 Missing cases 638 IMPDP94 Q25 Limit foreign import, Dem party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 60 5.2 10.7 10.7 2 129 11.2 23.0 33.8 3 146 12.7 26.1 59.8 4 54 4.7 9.6 69.5 5 57 5.0 10.2 79.6 6 74 6.4 13.2 92.9 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 40 3.5 7.1 100.0 . 412 35.9 Missing NOT SURE 8 176 15.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 560 Missing cases 588 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMPRP94 Q25 Limit foreign import, Rep party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 30 2.6 5.7 5.7 2 83 7.2 15.7 21.3 3 75 6.5 14.2 35.5 4 40 3.5 7.5 43.0 5 81 7.1 15.3 58.3 6 145 12.6 27.4 85.7 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 76 6.6 14.3 100.0 . 416 36.2 Missing NOT SURE 8 202 17.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 530 Missing cases 618 IMPDH94 Q25 Limit foreign import, Dem hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 56 4.9 12.7 12.7 2 94 8.2 21.3 33.9 3 108 9.4 24.4 58.4 4 37 3.2 8.4 66.7 5 44 3.8 10.0 76.7 6 68 5.9 15.4 92.1 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 35 3.0 7.9 100.0 . 441 38.4 Missing NOT SURE 8 265 23.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 442 Missing cases 706 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMPRH94 Q25 Limit foreign import, Rep hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 32 2.8 7.4 7.4 2 66 5.7 15.2 22.6 3 57 5.0 13.2 35.8 4 37 3.2 8.5 44.3 5 52 4.5 12.0 56.4 6 118 10.3 27.3 83.6 STRONGLY OPPOSE 7 71 6.2 16.4 100.0 . 422 36.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 293 25.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 433 Missing cases 715 LCBC94 Q26 Political philosophy, Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 156 13.6 20.3 20.3 LIBERAL 2 265 23.1 34.5 54.7 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 202 17.6 26.3 81.0 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 126 11.0 16.4 97.4 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 14 1.2 1.8 99.2 CONSERVATIVE 6 5 .4 .7 99.9 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 1 .1 .1 100.0 . 358 31.2 Missing NOT SURE 8 21 1.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 769 Missing cases 379 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCHRP94 Q26 Political philosophy, Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 9 .8 1.4 1.4 LIBERAL 2 25 2.2 3.9 5.2 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 50 4.4 7.7 13.0 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 71 6.2 11.0 23.9 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 117 10.2 18.1 42.0 CONSERVATIVE 6 246 21.4 38.0 79.9 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 130 11.3 20.1 100.0 . 376 32.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 124 10.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 648 Missing cases 500 LCBD94 Q26 Political philosophy, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 3 .3 .4 .4 LIBERAL 2 3 .3 .4 .8 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 11 1.0 1.4 2.2 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 27 2.4 3.6 5.8 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 101 8.8 13.3 19.1 CONSERVATIVE 6 446 38.9 58.7 77.8 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 169 14.7 22.2 100.0 . 361 31.4 Missing NOT SURE 8 27 2.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 760 Missing cases 388 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCJK94 Q26 Political philosophy, Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 1 .1 .2 .2 LIBERAL 2 3 .3 .5 .6 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 12 1.0 1.8 2.4 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 54 4.7 8.1 10.6 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 106 9.2 16.0 26.5 CONSERVATIVE 6 322 28.0 48.6 75.1 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 165 14.4 24.9 100.0 . 386 33.6 Missing NOT SURE 8 99 8.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 663 Missing cases 485 LCBK94 Q26 Political philosophy, Kerry Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 23 2.0 4.0 4.0 LIBERAL 2 145 12.6 25.2 29.2 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 161 14.0 28.0 57.2 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 134 11.7 23.3 80.5 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 58 5.1 10.1 90.6 CONSERVATIVE 6 45 3.9 7.8 98.4 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 9 .8 1.6 100.0 . 400 34.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 173 15.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 575 Missing cases 573 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCDQ94 Q26 Political philosophy, Quayle Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 2 .2 .3 .3 LIBERAL 2 2 .2 .3 .6 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 1 .1 .1 .7 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 18 1.6 2.5 3.2 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 17 1.5 2.4 5.5 CONSERVATIVE 6 255 22.2 35.3 40.9 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 427 37.2 59.1 100.0 . 379 33.0 Missing NOT SURE 8 47 4.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 722 Missing cases 426 LCAV94 Q26 Political philosophy, avg voter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 1 .1 .1 .1 LIBERAL 2 2 .2 .3 .4 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 43 3.7 5.8 6.2 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 249 21.7 33.7 40.0 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 307 26.7 41.6 81.6 CONSERVATIVE 6 131 11.4 17.8 99.3 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 5 .4 .7 100.0 . 373 32.5 Missing NOT SURE 8 37 3.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 738 Missing cases 410 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCDP94 Q26 Political philosophy, Dem party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 103 9.0 13.6 13.6 LIBERAL 2 281 24.5 37.1 50.7 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 286 24.9 37.7 88.4 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 68 5.9 9.0 97.4 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 17 1.5 2.2 99.6 CONSERVATIVE 6 2 .2 .3 99.9 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 1 .1 .1 100.0 . 371 32.3 Missing NOT SURE 8 19 1.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 758 Missing cases 390 LCRP94 Q26 Political philosophy, Rep party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 1 .1 .1 .1 LIBERAL 2 2 .2 .3 .4 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 7 .6 .9 1.3 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 20 1.7 2.6 4.0 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 103 9.0 13.6 17.5 CONSERVATIVE 6 436 38.0 57.5 75.1 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 189 16.5 24.9 100.0 . 365 31.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 25 2.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 758 Missing cases 390 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCUWS94 Q26 Political philosophy, United We Stan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 3 .3 .7 .7 LIBERAL 2 10 .9 2.5 3.2 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 13 1.1 3.2 6.5 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 51 4.4 12.7 19.2 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 60 5.2 14.9 34.1 CONSERVATIVE 6 148 12.9 36.8 70.9 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 117 10.2 29.1 100.0 . 421 36.7 Missing NOT SURE 8 325 28.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 402 Missing cases 746 LCDH94 Q26 Political philosophy, Dem hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 103 9.0 15.3 15.3 LIBERAL 2 273 23.8 40.4 55.7 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 187 16.3 27.7 83.4 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 74 6.4 11.0 94.4 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 20 1.7 3.0 97.3 CONSERVATIVE 6 16 1.4 2.4 99.7 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 2 .2 .3 100.0 . 407 35.5 Missing NOT SURE 8 66 5.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 675 Missing cases 473 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCRH94 Q26 Political philosophy, Rep hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 2 .2 .3 .3 LIBERAL 2 4 .3 .6 .9 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 9 .8 1.3 2.1 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 39 3.4 5.6 7.7 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 104 9.1 14.9 22.6 CONSERVATIVE 6 338 29.4 48.4 71.1 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 202 17.6 28.9 100.0 . 381 33.2 Missing NOT SURE 8 69 6.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 698 Missing cases 450 LCDS94 Q26 Political philosophy, Dem Senate can Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 37 3.2 10.8 10.8 LIBERAL 2 102 8.9 29.7 40.5 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 97 8.4 28.3 68.8 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 82 7.1 23.9 92.7 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 19 1.7 5.5 98.3 CONSERVATIVE 6 5 .4 1.5 99.7 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 1 .1 .3 100.0 . 775 67.5 Missing NOT SURE 8 30 2.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 343 Missing cases 805 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCRS94 Q26 Political philosophy, Rep Senate can Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 3 .3 .9 .9 LIBERAL 2 1 .1 .3 1.2 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 5 .4 1.5 2.7 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 13 1.1 3.8 6.5 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 12 1.0 3.5 10.0 CONSERVATIVE 6 82 7.1 24.2 34.2 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 223 19.4 65.8 100.0 . 777 67.7 Missing NOT SURE 8 32 2.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 339 Missing cases 809 LCDG94 Q26 Political philosophy, Dem gub cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 100 8.7 20.9 20.9 LIBERAL 2 201 17.5 42.1 63.0 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 99 8.6 20.7 83.7 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 52 4.5 10.9 94.6 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 10 .9 2.1 96.7 CONSERVATIVE 6 14 1.2 2.9 99.6 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 2 .2 .4 100.0 . 644 56.1 Missing NOT SURE 8 26 2.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 478 Missing cases 670 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCRG94 Q26 Political philosophy, Rep gub cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 2 .2 .4 .4 LIBERAL 2 6 .5 1.2 1.6 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 6 .5 1.2 2.9 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 25 2.2 5.1 8.0 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 58 5.1 11.8 19.8 CONSERVATIVE 6 283 24.7 57.8 77.6 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 110 9.6 22.4 100.0 . 632 55.1 Missing NOT SURE 8 26 2.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 490 Missing cases 658 HLPBC94 Q27 Can help state/district, Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 38 3.3 5.1 5.1 2 192 16.7 25.9 31.1 3 241 21.0 32.6 63.6 4 87 7.6 11.8 75.4 POOR 5 182 15.9 24.6 100.0 . 372 32.4 Missing NOT SURE 6 36 3.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 740 Missing cases 408 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HLPHRP94 Q27 Can help state/district, Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 3 .3 .5 .5 2 24 2.1 4.0 4.4 3 87 7.6 14.3 18.8 4 146 12.7 24.1 42.8 POOR 5 347 30.2 57.2 100.0 . 385 33.5 Missing NOT SURE 6 156 13.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 607 Missing cases 541 HLPBD94 Q27 Can help state/district, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 22 1.9 3.1 3.1 2 137 11.9 19.4 22.5 3 213 18.6 30.2 52.7 4 116 10.1 16.4 69.1 POOR 5 218 19.0 30.9 100.0 . 383 33.4 Missing NOT SURE 6 59 5.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 706 Missing cases 442 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HLPDP94 Q27 Can help state/district, Dem party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 23 2.0 3.2 3.2 2 203 17.7 28.0 31.1 3 265 23.1 36.5 67.6 4 93 8.1 12.8 80.4 POOR 5 142 12.4 19.6 100.0 . 383 33.4 Missing NOT SURE 6 39 3.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 726 Missing cases 422 HLPRP94 Q27 Can help state/district, Rep party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 17 1.5 2.4 2.4 2 146 12.7 20.6 23.0 3 206 17.9 29.1 52.0 4 158 13.8 22.3 74.3 POOR 5 182 15.9 25.7 100.0 . 383 33.4 Missing NOT SURE 6 56 4.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 709 Missing cases 439 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HLPDH94 Q27 Can help state/district, Dem hse can Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 64 5.6 9.8 9.8 2 226 19.7 34.5 44.3 3 155 13.5 23.7 67.9 4 78 6.8 11.9 79.8 POOR 5 132 11.5 20.2 100.0 . 423 36.8 Missing NOT SURE 6 70 6.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 655 Missing cases 493 HLPRH94 Q27 Can help state/district, Rep hse can Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 40 3.5 6.0 6.0 2 164 14.3 24.5 30.4 3 176 15.3 26.3 56.7 4 88 7.7 13.1 69.9 POOR 5 202 17.6 30.1 100.0 . 399 34.8 Missing NOT SURE 6 79 6.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 670 Missing cases 478 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HLPDS94 Q27 Can help state/district, Dem Senate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 36 3.1 10.4 10.4 2 143 12.5 41.3 51.7 3 106 9.2 30.6 82.4 4 20 1.7 5.8 88.2 POOR 5 41 3.6 11.8 100.0 . 782 68.1 Missing NOT SURE 6 20 1.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 346 Missing cases 802 HLPRS94 Q27 Can help state/district, Rep Senate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 14 1.2 4.3 4.3 2 41 3.6 12.7 17.0 3 45 3.9 13.9 30.9 4 28 2.4 8.6 39.5 POOR 5 196 17.1 60.5 100.0 . 791 68.9 Missing NOT SURE 6 33 2.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 324 Missing cases 824 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HLPDG94 Q27 Can help state/district, Dem gub can Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 24 2.1 5.2 5.2 2 129 11.2 27.8 33.0 3 116 10.1 25.0 58.0 4 59 5.1 12.7 70.7 POOR 5 136 11.8 29.3 100.0 . 652 56.8 Missing NOT SURE 6 32 2.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 464 Missing cases 684 HLPRG94 Q27 Can help state/district, Rep gub can Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 43 3.7 9.1 9.1 2 121 10.5 25.5 34.5 3 113 9.8 23.8 58.3 4 85 7.4 17.9 76.2 POOR 5 113 9.8 23.8 100.0 . 643 56.0 Missing NOT SURE 6 30 2.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 475 Missing cases 673 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CARBC94 Q27 Cares about people like me, Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 141 12.3 18.2 18.2 2 252 22.0 32.5 50.7 3 156 13.6 20.1 70.8 4 59 5.1 7.6 78.5 POOR 5 167 14.5 21.5 100.0 . 353 30.7 Missing NOT SURE 6 20 1.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 775 Missing cases 373 CARHRP94 Q27 Cares about people like me, Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 12 1.0 1.8 1.8 2 62 5.4 9.3 11.1 3 171 14.9 25.7 36.8 4 152 13.2 22.8 59.6 POOR 5 269 23.4 40.4 100.0 . 367 32.0 Missing NOT SURE 6 115 10.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 666 Missing cases 482 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CARBD94 Q27 Cares about people like me, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 19 1.7 2.5 2.5 2 112 9.8 15.0 17.5 3 216 18.8 28.9 46.4 4 144 12.5 19.3 65.6 POOR 5 257 22.4 34.4 100.0 . 364 31.7 Missing NOT SURE 6 36 3.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 748 Missing cases 400 CARDP94 Q27 Cares about people like me, Dem part Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 56 4.9 7.2 7.2 2 253 22.0 32.7 40.0 3 223 19.4 28.8 68.8 4 96 8.4 12.4 81.2 POOR 5 145 12.6 18.8 100.0 . 359 31.3 Missing NOT SURE 6 16 1.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 773 Missing cases 375 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CARRP94 Q27 Cares about people like me, Rep part Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 14 1.2 1.8 1.8 2 124 10.8 16.3 18.2 3 169 14.7 22.3 40.4 4 184 16.0 24.2 64.7 POOR 5 268 23.3 35.3 100.0 . 367 32.0 Missing NOT SURE 6 22 1.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 759 Missing cases 389 CARDH94 Q27 Cares about people like me, Dem hse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 77 6.7 11.2 11.2 2 218 19.0 31.7 42.9 3 194 16.9 28.2 71.2 4 68 5.9 9.9 81.1 POOR 5 130 11.3 18.9 100.0 . 410 35.7 Missing NOT SURE 6 51 4.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 687 Missing cases 461 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CARRH94 Q27 Cares about people like me, Rep hse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 42 3.7 5.9 5.9 2 145 12.6 20.3 26.2 3 174 15.2 24.3 50.5 4 112 9.8 15.7 66.2 POOR 5 242 21.1 33.8 100.0 . 377 32.8 Missing NOT SURE 6 56 4.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 715 Missing cases 433 CARDS94 Q27 Cares about people like me, Dem Sena Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 43 3.7 12.5 12.5 2 131 11.4 38.0 50.4 3 98 8.5 28.4 78.8 4 33 2.9 9.6 88.4 POOR 5 40 3.5 11.6 100.0 . 785 68.4 Missing NOT SURE 6 18 1.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 345 Missing cases 803 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CARRS94 Q27 Cares about people like me, Rep Sena Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 12 1.0 3.6 3.6 2 31 2.7 9.4 13.1 3 51 4.4 15.5 28.6 4 32 2.8 9.7 38.3 POOR 5 203 17.7 61.7 100.0 . 800 69.7 Missing NOT SURE 6 19 1.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 329 Missing cases 819 CARDG94 Q27 Cares about people like me, Dem gub Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 37 3.2 7.7 7.7 2 132 11.5 27.6 35.4 3 132 11.5 27.6 63.0 4 52 4.5 10.9 73.8 POOR 5 125 10.9 26.2 100.0 . 652 56.8 Missing NOT SURE 6 18 1.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 478 Missing cases 670 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CARRG94 Q27 Cares about people like me, Rep gub Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 33 2.9 6.7 6.7 2 116 10.1 23.5 30.2 3 116 10.1 23.5 53.8 4 80 7.0 16.2 70.0 POOR 5 148 12.9 30.0 100.0 . 641 55.8 Missing NOT SURE 6 14 1.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 493 Missing cases 655 ECNBC94 Q27 Ability to solve econ prob, Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 67 5.8 8.6 8.6 2 226 19.7 28.9 37.5 3 181 15.8 23.1 60.6 4 85 7.4 10.9 71.5 POOR 5 223 19.4 28.5 100.0 . 350 30.5 Missing NOT SURE 6 16 1.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 782 Missing cases 366 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ECNHRP94 Q27 Ability to solve econ prob, Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 13 1.1 1.9 1.9 2 58 5.1 8.7 10.6 3 118 10.3 17.7 28.3 4 137 11.9 20.5 48.9 POOR 5 341 29.7 51.1 100.0 . 363 31.6 Missing NOT SURE 6 118 10.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 667 Missing cases 481 ECNBD94 Q27 Ability to solve econ prob, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 15 1.3 2.1 2.1 2 111 9.7 15.2 17.3 3 220 19.2 30.1 47.4 4 165 14.4 22.6 70.0 POOR 5 219 19.1 30.0 100.0 . 360 31.4 Missing NOT SURE 6 58 5.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 730 Missing cases 418 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ECNDP94 Q27 Ability to solve econ prob, Dem part Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 28 2.4 3.7 3.7 2 165 14.4 21.7 25.4 3 240 20.9 31.5 56.9 4 125 10.9 16.4 73.3 POOR 5 203 17.7 26.7 100.0 . 362 31.5 Missing NOT SURE 6 25 2.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 761 Missing cases 387 ECNRP94 Q27 Ability to solve econ prob, Rep part Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 18 1.6 2.4 2.4 2 127 11.1 17.2 19.6 3 204 17.8 27.6 47.2 4 159 13.9 21.5 68.6 POOR 5 232 20.2 31.4 100.0 . 369 32.1 Missing NOT SURE 6 39 3.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 740 Missing cases 408 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ECNDH94 Q27 Ability to solve econ prob, Dem hse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 29 2.5 4.3 4.3 2 166 14.5 24.6 28.9 3 209 18.2 31.0 59.9 4 95 8.3 14.1 74.0 POOR 5 175 15.2 26.0 100.0 . 410 35.7 Missing NOT SURE 6 64 5.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 674 Missing cases 474 ECNRH94 Q27 Ability to solve econ prob, Rep hse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 35 3.0 5.1 5.1 2 122 10.6 17.6 22.7 3 170 14.8 24.5 47.2 4 134 11.7 19.3 66.5 POOR 5 232 20.2 33.5 100.0 . 383 33.4 Missing NOT SURE 6 72 6.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 693 Missing cases 455 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ECNDS94 Q27 Ability to solve econ prob, Dem Sena Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 26 2.3 7.7 7.7 2 115 10.0 34.1 41.8 3 108 9.4 32.0 73.9 4 37 3.2 11.0 84.9 POOR 5 51 4.4 15.1 100.0 . 791 68.9 Missing NOT SURE 6 20 1.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 337 Missing cases 811 ECNRS94 Q27 Ability to solve econ prob, Rep Sena Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 9 .8 2.9 2.9 2 37 3.2 11.8 14.6 3 37 3.2 11.8 26.4 4 36 3.1 11.5 37.9 POOR 5 195 17.0 62.1 100.0 . 802 69.9 Missing NOT SURE 6 32 2.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 314 Missing cases 834 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ECNDG94 Q27 Ability to solve econ prob, Dem gub Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 18 1.6 4.0 4.0 2 92 8.0 20.6 24.7 3 118 10.3 26.5 51.1 4 68 5.9 15.2 66.4 POOR 5 150 13.1 33.6 100.0 . 662 57.7 Missing NOT SURE 6 40 3.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 446 Missing cases 702 ECNRG94 Q27 Ability to solve econ prob, Rep gub Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 24 2.1 5.2 5.2 2 102 8.9 21.9 27.0 3 128 11.1 27.5 54.5 4 76 6.6 16.3 70.8 POOR 5 136 11.8 29.2 100.0 . 656 57.1 Missing NOT SURE 6 26 2.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 466 Missing cases 682 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVABC94 Q27 Overall evaluation, Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 83 7.2 10.3 10.3 2 279 24.3 34.7 45.0 3 152 13.2 18.9 63.9 4 78 6.8 9.7 73.5 POOR 5 213 18.6 26.5 100.0 . 339 29.5 Missing NOT SURE 6 4 .3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 805 Missing cases 343 EVAHRP94 Q27 Overall evaluation, Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 4 .3 .6 .6 2 29 2.5 4.1 4.6 3 106 9.2 14.8 19.4 4 172 15.0 24.0 43.4 POOR 5 405 35.3 56.6 100.0 . 353 30.7 Missing NOT SURE 6 79 6.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 716 Missing cases 432 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVABD94 Q27 Overall evaluation, Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 24 2.1 3.1 3.1 2 135 11.8 17.2 20.2 3 222 19.3 28.2 48.5 4 156 13.6 19.8 68.3 POOR 5 249 21.7 31.7 100.0 . 342 29.8 Missing NOT SURE 6 20 1.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 786 Missing cases 362 EVADQ94 Q27 Overall evaluation, Quayle Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 48 4.2 6.2 6.2 2 109 9.5 14.0 20.1 3 91 7.9 11.7 31.8 4 98 8.5 12.6 44.4 POOR 5 434 37.8 55.6 100.0 . 346 30.1 Missing NOT SURE 6 22 1.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 780 Missing cases 368 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVAJK94 Q27 Overall evaluation, Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 29 2.5 4.2 4.2 2 137 11.9 19.8 24.0 3 212 18.5 30.7 54.7 4 159 13.9 23.0 77.7 POOR 5 154 13.4 22.3 100.0 . 363 31.6 Missing NOT SURE 6 94 8.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 691 Missing cases 457 EVARL94 Q27 Overall evaluation, Limbaugh Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 54 4.7 7.1 7.1 2 76 6.6 10.0 17.1 3 59 5.1 7.8 24.8 4 38 3.3 5.0 29.8 POOR 5 534 46.5 70.2 100.0 . 346 30.1 Missing NOT SURE 6 41 3.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 761 Missing cases 387 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVAON94 Q27 Overall evaluation, North Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 24 2.1 3.2 3.2 2 44 3.8 5.8 9.0 3 74 6.4 9.8 18.8 4 55 4.8 7.3 26.1 POOR 5 558 48.6 73.9 100.0 . 350 30.5 Missing NOT SURE 6 43 3.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 755 Missing cases 393 EVAJJ94 Q27 Overall evaluation, Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 15 1.3 1.9 1.9 2 95 8.3 12.2 14.1 3 217 18.9 27.9 42.0 4 145 12.6 18.6 60.7 POOR 5 306 26.7 39.3 100.0 . 347 30.2 Missing NOT SURE 6 23 2.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 778 Missing cases 370 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVAAG94 Q27 Overall evaluation, Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 109 9.5 14.0 14.0 2 267 23.3 34.2 48.2 3 173 15.1 22.2 70.4 4 55 4.8 7.1 77.4 POOR 5 176 15.3 22.6 100.0 . 348 30.3 Missing NOT SURE 6 20 1.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 780 Missing cases 368 EVAHC94 Q27 Overall evaluation, Hillary Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 126 11.0 16.2 16.2 2 219 19.1 28.1 44.2 3 130 11.3 16.7 60.9 4 56 4.9 7.2 68.1 POOR 5 249 21.7 31.9 100.0 . 349 30.4 Missing NOT SURE 6 19 1.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 780 Missing cases 368 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVAPR94 Q27 Overall evaluation, Robertson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 16 1.4 2.1 2.1 2 48 4.2 6.3 8.4 3 79 6.9 10.4 18.7 4 79 6.9 10.4 29.1 POOR 5 541 47.1 70.9 100.0 . 353 30.7 Missing NOT SURE 6 32 2.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 763 Missing cases 385 EVACP94 Q27 Overall evaluation, Powell Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 64 5.6 9.8 9.8 2 226 19.7 34.6 44.4 3 245 21.3 37.5 81.9 4 79 6.9 12.1 94.0 POOR 5 39 3.4 6.0 100.0 . 352 30.7 Missing NOT SURE 6 143 12.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 653 Missing cases 495 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVABK94 Q27 Overall evaluation, Kerrey Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 28 2.4 4.5 4.5 2 156 13.6 25.2 29.8 3 250 21.8 40.5 70.2 4 98 8.5 15.9 86.1 POOR 5 86 7.5 13.9 100.0 . 363 31.6 Missing NOT SURE 6 167 14.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 618 Missing cases 530 EVAJB94 Q27 Overall evaluation, Brown Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 141 12.3 100.0 100.0 . 1007 87.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 141 Missing cases 1007 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVAPT94 Q27 Overall evaluation, Tsongas Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 29 2.5 4.6 4.6 2 146 12.7 23.0 27.6 3 204 17.8 32.1 59.7 4 124 10.8 19.5 79.2 POOR 5 132 11.5 20.8 100.0 . 365 31.8 Missing NOT SURE 6 148 12.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 635 Missing cases 513 EVASN94 Q27 Overall evaluation, Nunn Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 16 1.4 2.6 2.6 2 122 10.6 20.0 22.6 3 235 20.5 38.5 61.0 4 127 11.1 20.8 81.8 POOR 5 111 9.7 18.2 100.0 . 373 32.5 Missing NOT SURE 6 164 14.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 611 Missing cases 537 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVADP94 Q27 Overall evaluation, Dem party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 41 3.6 5.2 5.2 2 202 17.6 25.8 31.1 3 236 20.6 30.2 61.3 4 101 8.8 12.9 74.2 POOR 5 202 17.6 25.8 100.0 . 355 30.9 Missing NOT SURE 6 11 1.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 782 Missing cases 366 EVARP94 Q27 Overall evaluation, Rep party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 17 1.5 2.2 2.2 2 123 10.7 15.8 18.0 3 195 17.0 25.1 43.1 4 180 15.7 23.1 66.2 POOR 5 263 22.9 33.8 100.0 . 356 31.0 Missing NOT SURE 6 14 1.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 778 Missing cases 370 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVADH94 Q27 Overall evaluation, Dem hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 66 5.7 9.5 9.5 2 199 17.3 28.8 38.3 3 187 16.3 27.0 65.3 4 73 6.4 10.5 75.9 POOR 5 167 14.5 24.1 100.0 . 407 35.5 Missing NOT SURE 6 49 4.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 692 Missing cases 456 EVARH94 Q27 Overall evaluation, Rep hse cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 49 4.3 6.8 6.8 2 134 11.7 18.5 25.3 3 161 14.0 22.2 47.5 4 125 10.9 17.3 64.8 POOR 5 255 22.2 35.2 100.0 . 378 32.9 Missing NOT SURE 6 46 4.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 724 Missing cases 424 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVADS94 Q27 Overall evaluation, Dem Senate cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 33 2.9 9.3 9.3 2 127 11.1 35.9 45.2 3 111 9.7 31.4 76.6 4 34 3.0 9.6 86.2 POOR 5 49 4.3 13.8 100.0 . 781 68.0 Missing NOT SURE 6 13 1.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 354 Missing cases 794 EVARS94 Q27 Overall evaluation, Rep Senate cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 13 1.1 3.8 3.8 2 33 2.9 9.7 13.5 3 44 3.8 12.9 26.5 4 24 2.1 7.1 33.5 POOR 5 226 19.7 66.5 100.0 . 785 68.4 Missing NOT SURE 6 23 2.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 340 Missing cases 808 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVADG94 Q27 Overall evaluation, Dem gub cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 36 3.1 7.4 7.4 2 105 9.1 21.6 29.1 3 115 10.0 23.7 52.8 4 64 5.6 13.2 66.0 POOR 5 165 14.4 34.0 100.0 . 642 55.9 Missing NOT SURE 6 21 1.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 485 Missing cases 663 EVARG94 Q27 Overall evaluation, Rep gub cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 32 2.8 6.4 6.4 2 116 10.1 23.3 29.7 3 118 10.3 23.7 53.4 4 88 7.7 17.7 71.1 POOR 5 144 12.5 28.9 100.0 . 637 55.5 Missing NOT SURE 6 13 1.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 498 Missing cases 650 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVAIND94 Q28 How favorable, independents Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1 41 3.6 5.2 5.2 2 161 14.0 20.5 25.7 3 340 29.6 43.3 69.0 4 131 11.4 16.7 85.6 UNFAVORABLE 5 113 9.8 14.4 100.0 . 332 28.9 Missing NOT SURE 6 30 2.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 786 Missing cases 362 EVACON94 Q28 How favorable, Congress Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1 18 1.6 2.2 2.2 2 173 15.1 21.5 23.8 3 144 12.5 17.9 41.7 4 275 24.0 34.2 76.0 UNFAVORABLE 5 193 16.8 24.0 100.0 . 336 29.3 Missing NOT SURE 6 9 .8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 803 Missing cases 345 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVASC94 Q28 How favorable, Supreme Court Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1 48 4.2 5.9 5.9 2 271 23.6 33.5 39.4 3 188 16.4 23.2 62.7 4 195 17.0 24.1 86.8 UNFAVORABLE 5 107 9.3 13.2 100.0 . 326 28.4 Missing NOT SURE 6 13 1.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 809 Missing cases 339 EVAMIL94 Q28 How favorable, military Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1 141 12.3 17.5 17.5 2 309 26.9 38.3 55.8 3 214 18.6 26.5 82.3 4 82 7.1 10.2 92.4 UNFAVORABLE 5 61 5.3 7.6 100.0 . 329 28.7 Missing NOT SURE 6 12 1.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 807 Missing cases 341 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVAMM94 Q28 How favorable, mass media Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1 12 1.0 1.5 1.5 2 84 7.3 10.4 11.9 3 136 11.8 16.8 28.7 4 224 19.5 27.7 56.4 UNFAVORABLE 5 353 30.7 43.6 100.0 . 330 28.7 Missing NOT SURE 6 9 .8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 809 Missing cases 339 EVABUS94 Q28 How favorable, business corp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1 20 1.7 2.5 2.5 2 141 12.3 17.9 20.4 3 256 22.3 32.4 52.9 4 233 20.3 29.5 82.4 UNFAVORABLE 5 139 12.1 17.6 100.0 . 338 29.4 Missing NOT SURE 6 21 1.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 789 Missing cases 359 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALAB94 Q28 How favorable, labor unions Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1 61 5.3 7.6 7.6 2 210 18.3 26.3 33.9 3 158 13.8 19.8 53.6 4 198 17.2 24.8 78.4 UNFAVORABLE 5 173 15.1 21.6 100.0 . 331 28.8 Missing NOT SURE 6 17 1.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 800 Missing cases 348 EVAUWS94 Q28 How favorable, United We Stand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1 18 1.6 3.3 3.3 2 37 3.2 6.8 10.1 3 139 12.1 25.5 35.5 4 112 9.8 20.5 56.0 UNFAVORABLE 5 240 20.9 44.0 100.0 . 359 31.3 Missing NOT SURE 6 243 21.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 546 Missing cases 602 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVAFC94 Q28 How favorable, Fundamentalist Christ Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1 66 5.7 8.6 8.6 2 66 5.7 8.6 17.3 3 99 8.6 12.9 30.2 4 104 9.1 13.6 43.8 UNFAVORABLE 5 430 37.5 56.2 100.0 . 340 29.6 Missing NOT SURE 6 43 3.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 765 Missing cases 383 EVAWOM94 Q28 How favorable, womens movement Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1 101 8.8 12.9 12.9 2 216 18.8 27.6 40.5 3 163 14.2 20.8 61.3 4 125 10.9 16.0 77.3 UNFAVORABLE 5 178 15.5 22.7 100.0 . 331 28.8 Missing NOT SURE 6 34 3.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 783 Missing cases 365 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVAENV94 Q28 How favorable, environmentalists Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY FAVORABLE 1 161 14.0 20.0 20.0 2 280 24.4 34.9 54.9 3 123 10.7 15.3 70.2 4 123 10.7 15.3 85.6 UNFAVORABLE 5 116 10.1 14.4 100.0 . 328 28.6 Missing NOT SURE 6 17 1.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 803 Missing cases 345 FIRM94 Q29a Better be party supporter than ind Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 63 5.5 7.7 7.7 2 144 12.5 17.6 25.3 3 201 17.5 24.6 49.9 4 244 21.3 29.8 79.7 STRONGLY AGREE 5 166 14.5 20.3 100.0 . 311 27.1 Missing NOT SURE 6 19 1.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 818 Missing cases 330 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SPECIA94 Q29b Special interests have power Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 45 3.9 5.7 5.7 2 154 13.4 19.4 25.1 3 114 9.9 14.4 39.4 4 326 28.4 41.1 80.5 STRONGLY AGREE 5 155 13.5 19.5 100.0 . 316 27.5 Missing NOT SURE 6 38 3.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 794 Missing cases 354 TRUPEO94 Q29c Most people can be trusted Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 32 2.8 4.0 4.0 2 218 19.0 26.9 30.9 3 221 19.3 27.3 58.2 4 305 26.6 37.7 95.9 STRONGLY AGREE 5 33 2.9 4.1 100.0 . 314 27.4 Missing NOT SURE 6 25 2.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 809 Missing cases 339 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PTYCON94 Q29d Parties confuse issues/no choice Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 29 2.5 3.6 3.6 2 211 18.4 25.9 29.4 3 146 12.7 17.9 47.3 4 313 27.3 38.4 85.7 STRONGLY AGREE 5 117 10.2 14.3 100.0 . 314 27.4 Missing NOT SURE 6 18 1.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 816 Missing cases 332 EQUAL94 Q29e Everyone have equal opportunity Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 37 3.2 4.6 4.6 2 105 9.1 13.1 17.7 3 135 11.8 16.9 34.6 4 324 28.2 40.4 75.0 STRONGLY AGREE 5 200 17.4 25.0 100.0 . 322 28.0 Missing NOT SURE 6 25 2.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 801 Missing cases 347 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BETTER94 Q29f I am better informed than most Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 9 .8 1.1 1.1 2 56 4.9 7.1 8.2 3 157 13.7 19.8 28.1 4 349 30.4 44.1 72.2 STRONGLY AGREE 5 220 19.2 27.8 100.0 . 317 27.6 Missing NOT SURE 6 40 3.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 791 Missing cases 357 RADICA94 Q29g Government needs radical change Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 36 3.1 4.5 4.5 2 203 17.7 25.2 29.7 3 148 12.9 18.4 48.1 4 255 22.2 31.7 79.9 STRONGLY AGREE 5 162 14.1 20.1 100.0 . 317 27.6 Missing NOT SURE 6 27 2.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 804 Missing cases 344 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LOOKOU94 Q29h People looking out for themselves Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 6 .5 .7 .7 2 78 6.8 9.5 10.2 3 139 12.1 17.0 27.2 4 440 38.3 53.7 80.9 STRONGLY AGREE 5 157 13.7 19.1 100.0 . 320 27.9 Missing NOT SURE 6 8 .7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 820 Missing cases 328 WELREP94 Q29i People like me well represented Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 104 9.1 13.3 13.3 2 365 31.8 46.6 59.8 3 162 14.1 20.7 80.5 4 139 12.1 17.7 98.2 STRONGLY AGREE 5 14 1.2 1.8 100.0 . 319 27.8 Missing NOT SURE 6 45 3.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 784 Missing cases 364 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FAMTIE94 Q29j More emphasis on family ties Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 40 3.5 5.0 5.0 2 86 7.5 10.6 15.6 3 138 12.0 17.1 32.7 4 290 25.3 35.9 68.6 STRONGLY AGREE 5 254 22.1 31.4 100.0 . 318 27.7 Missing NOT SURE 6 22 1.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 808 Missing cases 340 WRDGOD94 Q29k Bible is actual word of God Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 303 26.4 37.7 37.7 2 195 17.0 24.3 61.9 3 102 8.9 12.7 74.6 4 91 7.9 11.3 85.9 STRONGLY AGREE 5 113 9.8 14.1 100.0 . 321 28.0 Missing NOT SURE 6 23 2.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 804 Missing cases 344 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RIDPTY94 Q29l More efficient if rid of parties Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 301 26.2 38.9 38.9 2 329 28.7 42.6 81.5 3 74 6.4 9.6 91.1 4 41 3.6 5.3 96.4 STRONGLY AGREE 5 28 2.4 3.6 100.0 . 317 27.6 Missing NOT SURE 6 58 5.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 773 Missing cases 375 SEX94 Q30 What is your sex Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MALE 1 450 39.2 53.8 53.8 FEMALE 2 387 33.7 46.2 100.0 . 311 27.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 837 Missing cases 311 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INCOME94 Q31 What was your income last yr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNDER 20,000 1 97 8.4 11.9 11.9 20,000 - 39,999 2 242 21.1 29.8 41.7 40,000 - 59,999 3 210 18.3 25.9 67.6 60,000 - 79,999 4 122 10.6 15.0 82.6 80,000 - 99,999 5 61 5.3 7.5 90.1 OVER 100,000 6 80 7.0 9.9 100.0 . 336 29.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 812 Missing cases 336 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - VET94 Q32 Are you or your spouse a veteran Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 365 31.8 43.7 43.7 NO 2 470 40.9 56.3 100.0 . 313 27.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 835 Missing cases 313 WWII94 Q33 If yes, World War II Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 160 13.9 100.0 100.0 . 988 86.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 160 Missing cases 988 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - KOREA94 Q33 If yes, Korea Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 88 7.7 100.0 100.0 . 1060 92.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 88 Missing cases 1060 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - VIET94 Q33 If yes, Vietnam Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 71 6.2 100.0 100.0 . 1077 93.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 71 Missing cases 1077 PGULF94 Q33 If yes, Persian Gulf Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CHECKED 1 4 .3 100.0 100.0 . 1144 99.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 4 Missing cases 1144 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - REL94 Q34 What is your religious preference Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CATHOLIC 1 147 12.8 17.7 17.7 PROTESTANT 2 475 41.4 57.2 74.9 JEWISH 3 22 1.9 2.7 77.6 BAPTIST 4 57 5.0 6.9 84.5 NO PREFERENCE 5 79 6.9 9.5 94.0 OTHER 6 50 4.4 6.0 100.0 . 318 27.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 830 Missing cases 318 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BNAG94 Q35 Do you consider self born-again Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 212 18.5 26.2 26.2 NO 2 598 52.1 73.8 100.0 . 338 29.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 810 Missing cases 338 CHRIST94 Q36 Do you consider self fundamentalist Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 145 12.6 18.1 18.1 NO 2 654 57.0 81.9 100.0 . 349 30.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 799 Missing cases 349 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONTH94 Q37 Month of todays date Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 87 7.6 10.7 10.7 2 7 .6 .9 11.5 4 1 .1 .1 11.6 10 1 .1 .1 11.8 11 662 57.7 81.1 92.9 12 57 5.0 7.0 99.9 15 1 .1 .1 100.0 . 332 28.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 816 Missing cases 332 DAY94 Q37 Day of todays date Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 7 .6 .9 .9 2 7 .6 .9 1.7 3 8 .7 1.0 2.7 4 4 .3 .5 3.2 5 5 .4 .6 3.8 6 2 .2 .2 4.1 7 4 .3 .5 4.6 8 1 .1 .1 4.7 9 5 .4 .6 5.3 10 6 .5 .7 6.0 11 5 .4 .6 6.6 12 14 1.2 1.7 8.4 13 24 2.1 3.0 11.3 14 225 19.6 27.7 39.0 15 118 10.3 14.5 53.5 16 49 4.3 6.0 59.5 17 41 3.6 5.0 64.6 18 30 2.6 3.7 68.3 19 34 3.0 4.2 72.4 20 28 2.4 3.4 75.9 21 19 1.7 2.3 78.2 22 25 2.2 3.1 81.3 23 13 1.1 1.6 82.9 24 7 .6 .9 83.8 25 16 1.4 2.0 85.7 26 23 2.0 2.8 88.6 27 25 2.2 3.1 91.6 28 26 2.3 3.2 94.8 29 18 1.6 2.2 97.0 30 21 1.8 2.6 99.6 31 3 .3 .4 100.0 . 335 29.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 813 Missing cases 335 YEAR94 Q37 Year of todays date Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 94 818 71.3 100.0 100.0 . 330 28.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 818 Missing cases 330 **********1996 Pre-election Wave********** PTYHRS6A Q1, hours per week to party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT INVOLVED 1 337 29.4 50.6 50.6 TWO HOURS OR LESS 2 211 18.4 31.7 82.3 THREE TO FIVE HOURS 3 67 5.8 10.1 92.3 SIX TO TEN HOURS 4 24 2.1 3.6 95.9 MORE THAN TEN HOURS 5 27 2.4 4.1 100.0 . 482 42.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 666 Missing cases 482 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INTRN6A Q2, Rep Pres nomination Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY INTERESTED 1 255 22.2 39.3 39.3 2 113 9.8 17.4 56.7 3 95 8.3 14.6 71.3 4 63 5.5 9.7 81.0 5 32 2.8 4.9 86.0 6 28 2.4 4.3 90.3 NOT INTERESTED 7 63 5.5 9.7 100.0 . 499 43.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 649 Missing cases 499 INTGE6A Q2, general election for President Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY INTERESTED 1 522 45.5 78.1 78.1 2 94 8.2 14.1 92.2 3 24 2.1 3.6 95.8 4 13 1.1 1.9 97.8 5 7 .6 1.0 98.8 6 4 .3 .6 99.4 NOT INTERESTED 7 4 .3 .6 100.0 . 480 41.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 668 Missing cases 480 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INTHRD6A Q2, US House race in your district Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY INTERESTED 1 330 28.7 50.8 50.8 2 132 11.5 20.3 71.1 3 94 8.2 14.5 85.5 4 49 4.3 7.5 93.1 5 23 2.0 3.5 96.6 6 11 1.0 1.7 98.3 NOT INTERESTED 7 11 1.0 1.7 100.0 . 498 43.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 650 Missing cases 498 INTHRN6A Q2, US House races nationally Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY INTERESTED 1 250 21.8 38.3 38.3 2 136 11.8 20.9 59.2 3 108 9.4 16.6 75.8 4 84 7.3 12.9 88.7 5 41 3.6 6.3 94.9 6 16 1.4 2.5 97.4 NOT INTERESTED 7 17 1.5 2.6 100.0 . 496 43.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 652 Missing cases 496 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INTSLR6A Q2, other state and local races Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY INTERESTED 1 300 26.1 45.6 45.6 2 174 15.2 26.4 72.0 3 99 8.6 15.0 87.1 4 46 4.0 7.0 94.1 5 22 1.9 3.3 97.4 6 10 .9 1.5 98.9 NOT INTERESTED 7 7 .6 1.1 100.0 . 490 42.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 658 Missing cases 490 HVOT926A Q3, How vote in the 1992 presidential ra Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent GEORGE BUSH 1 212 18.5 31.1 31.1 BILL CLINTON 2 436 38.0 64.0 95.2 H. ROSS PEROT 3 26 2.3 3.8 99.0 OTHER/WRITE-IN 4 6 .5 .9 99.9 DID NOT VOTE 5 1 .1 .1 100.0 . 467 40.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 681 Missing cases 467 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - VOTEWT6A Q3. Write-in Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 842 73.3 99.4 99.4 1 5 .4 .6 100.0 . 301 26.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 847 Missing cases 301 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HVOT946A Q4, How vote in the 1994 US House race Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE 1 431 37.5 63.5 63.5 REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE 2 236 20.6 34.8 98.2 OTHER/WRITE-IN 3 3 .3 .4 98.7 DID NOT VOTE 4 9 .8 1.3 100.0 . 469 40.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 679 Missing cases 469 HVOTWT6A Q4. Write-in Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 844 73.5 99.6 99.6 1 3 .3 .4 100.0 . 301 26.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 847 Missing cases 301 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONDH6A Q5, Dem House, contributed money Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 656 57.1 77.4 77.4 CHECKED 1 191 16.6 22.6 100.0 . 301 26.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 847 Missing cases 301 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVDH6A Q5, Dem House, convince friends Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 674 58.7 79.6 79.6 CHECKED 1 173 15.1 20.4 100.0 . 301 26.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 847 Missing cases 301 CLRKDH6A Q5, Dem House, clerical work Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 814 70.9 96.1 96.1 CHECKED 1 33 2.9 3.9 100.0 . 301 26.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 847 Missing cases 301 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVDH6A Q5, Dem House, canvassing Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 795 69.3 93.9 93.9 CHECKED 1 52 4.5 6.1 100.0 . 301 26.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 847 Missing cases 301 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OTHRDH6A Q5, Dem House, other activity Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 753 65.6 88.9 88.9 CHECKED 1 94 8.2 11.1 100.0 . 301 26.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 847 Missing cases 301 MONRH6A Q5, Rep House, contributed money Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 771 67.2 91.0 91.0 CHECKED 1 76 6.6 9.0 100.0 . 301 26.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 847 Missing cases 301 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVRH6A Q5, Rep House, convince friends Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 747 65.1 88.2 88.2 CHECKED 1 100 8.7 11.8 100.0 . 301 26.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 847 Missing cases 301 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLRKRH6A Q5, Rep House, clerical work Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 837 72.9 98.8 98.8 CHECKED 1 10 .9 1.2 100.0 . 301 26.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 847 Missing cases 301 CANVRH6A Q5, Rep House, canvassing Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 825 71.9 97.4 97.4 CHECKED 1 22 1.9 2.6 100.0 . 301 26.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 847 Missing cases 301 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OTHRRH6A Q5, Rep House, other activity Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 797 69.4 94.1 94.1 CHECKED 1 50 4.4 5.9 100.0 . 301 26.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 847 Missing cases 301 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONDS6A Q5, Dem Senate, contributed money Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 719 62.6 84.9 84.9 CHECKED 1 128 11.1 15.1 100.0 . 301 26.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 847 Missing cases 301 CONVDS6A Q5, Dem Senate, convince friends Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 738 64.3 87.1 87.1 CHECKED 1 109 9.5 12.9 100.0 . 301 26.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 847 Missing cases 301 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLRKDS6A Q5, Dem Senate, clerical work Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 825 71.9 97.4 97.4 CHECKED 1 22 1.9 2.6 100.0 . 301 26.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 847 Missing cases 301 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVDS6A Q5, Dem Senate, canvassing Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 814 70.9 96.1 96.1 CHECKED 1 33 2.9 3.9 100.0 . 301 26.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 847 Missing cases 301 OTHRDS6A Q5, Dem Senate, other activity Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 784 68.3 92.6 92.6 CHECKED 1 63 5.5 7.4 100.0 . 301 26.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 847 Missing cases 301 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONRS6A Q5, Rep Senate, contributed money Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 819 71.3 96.7 96.7 CHECKED 1 28 2.4 3.3 100.0 . 301 26.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 847 Missing cases 301 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVRS6A Q5, Rep Senate, convince friends Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 809 70.5 95.5 95.5 CHECKED 1 38 3.3 4.5 100.0 . 301 26.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 847 Missing cases 301 CLRKRS6A Q5, Rep Senate, clerical work Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 842 73.3 99.4 99.4 CHECKED 1 5 .4 .6 100.0 . 301 26.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 847 Missing cases 301 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVRS6A Q5, Rep Senate, canvassing Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 839 73.1 99.1 99.1 CHECKED 1 8 .7 .9 100.0 . 301 26.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 847 Missing cases 301 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OTHRRS6A Q5, Rep Senate, other activity Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 827 72.0 97.6 97.6 CHECKED 1 20 1.7 2.4 100.0 . 301 26.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 847 Missing cases 301 MONDG6A Q5, Dem gubern, contributed money Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 712 62.0 84.1 84.1 CHECKED 1 135 11.8 15.9 100.0 . 301 26.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 847 Missing cases 301 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVDG6A Q5, Dem gubern, convince friends Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 722 62.9 85.2 85.2 CHECKED 1 125 10.9 14.8 100.0 . 301 26.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 847 Missing cases 301 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLRKDG6A Q5, Dem gubern, clerical work Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 831 72.4 98.1 98.1 CHECKED 1 16 1.4 1.9 100.0 . 301 26.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 847 Missing cases 301 CANVDG6A Q5, Dem gubern, canvassing Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 808 70.4 95.4 95.4 CHECKED 1 39 3.4 4.6 100.0 . 301 26.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 847 Missing cases 301 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OTHRDG6A Q5, Dem gubern, other activity Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 785 68.4 92.7 92.7 CHECKED 1 62 5.4 7.3 100.0 . 301 26.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 847 Missing cases 301 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONRG6A Q5, Rep gubern, contributed money Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 786 68.5 92.8 92.8 CHECKED 1 61 5.3 7.2 100.0 . 301 26.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 847 Missing cases 301 CONVRG6A Q5, Rep gubern, convince friends Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 767 66.8 90.6 90.6 CHECKED 1 80 7.0 9.4 100.0 . 301 26.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 847 Missing cases 301 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLRKRG6A Q5, Rep gubern, clerical work Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 840 73.2 99.2 99.2 CHECKED 1 7 .6 .8 100.0 . 301 26.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 847 Missing cases 301 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVRG6A Q5, Rep gubern, canvassing Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 832 72.5 98.2 98.2 CHECKED 1 15 1.3 1.8 100.0 . 301 26.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 847 Missing cases 301 OTHRRG6A Q5, Rep gubern, other activity Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 796 69.3 94.0 94.0 CHECKED 1 51 4.4 6.0 100.0 . 301 26.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 847 Missing cases 301 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PTYID6A Q6, describe your party affiliation Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONG DEMOCRAT 1 290 25.3 42.8 42.8 WEAK DEMOCRAT 2 94 8.2 13.9 56.6 INDEPENDENT DEM 3 60 5.2 8.8 65.5 INDEPENDENT 4 6 .5 .9 66.4 INDEPENDENT REP 5 29 2.5 4.3 70.6 WEAK REPUBLICAN 6 49 4.3 7.2 77.9 STRONG REPUBLICAN 7 150 13.1 22.1 100.0 . 466 40.6 Missing OTHER PTY WRITE-IN 8 4 .3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 678 Missing cases 470 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PTYWT6A Q6. Write-in Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 844 73.5 99.6 99.6 1 3 .3 .4 100.0 . 301 26.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 847 Missing cases 301 LIBCON6A Q7, describe your political philosophy Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 35 3.0 5.3 5.3 LIBERAL 2 171 14.9 26.0 31.3 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 96 8.4 14.6 45.9 MIDDLE OF-THE-ROAD 4 95 8.3 14.4 60.3 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 84 7.3 12.8 73.1 CONSERVATIVE 6 149 13.0 22.6 95.7 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 28 2.4 4.3 100.0 . 468 40.8 Missing OTHER/WRITE-IN 8 19 1.7 Missing NOT SURE 9 3 .3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 658 Missing cases 490 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCWT6A Q7. Write-in Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 824 71.8 97.3 97.3 1 23 2.0 2.7 100.0 . 301 26.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 847 Missing cases 301 CHAR6A Q8, characterize yourself: Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent INVOLVED CONSISTENTL 1 473 41.2 70.4 70.4 INVOLVED WORTHWHILE 2 199 17.3 29.6 100.0 . 476 41.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 672 Missing cases 476 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABORT6A Q9, amendment to prohibit abortions Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 89 7.8 13.8 13.8 FAVOR 2 58 5.1 9.0 22.8 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 18 1.6 2.8 25.5 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 22 1.9 3.4 28.9 OPPOSE 5 93 8.1 14.4 43.3 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 366 31.9 56.7 100.0 . 475 41.4 Missing NOT SURE 7 27 2.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 646 Missing cases 502 INVOL6A Q9, decreased US involvement Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 47 4.1 7.3 7.3 FAVOR 2 100 8.7 15.5 22.8 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 120 10.5 18.6 41.4 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 90 7.8 14.0 55.3 OPPOSE 5 133 11.6 20.6 76.0 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 155 13.5 24.0 100.0 . 476 41.5 Missing NOT SURE 7 27 2.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 645 Missing cases 503 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEFTX6A Q9, reduce deficit, higher taxes Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 85 7.4 13.1 13.1 FAVOR 2 197 17.2 30.4 43.6 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 137 11.9 21.2 64.8 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 68 5.9 10.5 75.3 OPPOSE 5 89 7.8 13.8 89.0 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 71 6.2 11.0 100.0 . 478 41.6 Missing NOT SURE 7 23 2.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 647 Missing cases 501 POLLUT6A Q9, more regulation to control pollution Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 162 14.1 24.7 24.7 FAVOR 2 198 17.2 30.2 54.9 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 111 9.7 16.9 71.8 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 55 4.8 8.4 80.2 OPPOSE 5 71 6.2 10.8 91.0 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 59 5.1 9.0 100.0 . 479 41.7 Missing NOT SURE 7 13 1.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 656 Missing cases 492 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMPORT6A Q9, limits on foreign imports Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 73 6.4 11.7 11.7 FAVOR 2 116 10.1 18.6 30.2 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 120 10.5 19.2 49.4 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 97 8.4 15.5 65.0 OPPOSE 5 148 12.9 23.7 88.6 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 71 6.2 11.4 100.0 . 478 41.6 Missing NOT SURE 7 45 3.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 625 Missing cases 523 AFFACT6A Q9, affirmative action programs Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 74 6.4 11.5 11.5 FAVOR 2 127 11.1 19.8 31.3 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 132 11.5 20.5 51.8 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 71 6.2 11.0 62.8 OPPOSE 5 114 9.9 17.7 80.6 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 125 10.9 19.4 100.0 . 482 42.0 Missing NOT SURE 7 23 2.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 643 Missing cases 505 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TERM6A Q9, term limits for Congress Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 126 11.0 19.7 19.7 FAVOR 2 111 9.7 17.3 37.0 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 85 7.4 13.3 50.3 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 52 4.5 8.1 58.4 OPPOSE 5 106 9.2 16.6 75.0 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 160 13.9 25.0 100.0 . 472 41.1 Missing NOT SURE 7 36 3.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 640 Missing cases 508 NHI6A Q9, national health insurance plan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 172 15.0 27.7 27.7 FAVOR 2 144 12.5 23.2 51.0 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 92 8.0 14.8 65.8 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 33 2.9 5.3 71.1 OPPOSE 5 56 4.9 9.0 80.2 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 123 10.7 19.8 100.0 . 480 41.8 Missing NOT SURE 7 48 4.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 620 Missing cases 528 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEFGP6A Q9, reduce deficit, program cuts Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 139 12.1 21.5 21.5 FAVOR 2 130 11.3 20.1 41.6 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 135 11.8 20.9 62.4 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 68 5.9 10.5 73.0 OPPOSE 5 109 9.5 16.8 89.8 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 66 5.7 10.2 100.0 . 473 41.2 Missing NOT SURE 7 28 2.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 647 Missing cases 501 SHFTST6A Q9, domestic programs to the states Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 128 11.1 19.8 19.8 FAVOR 2 126 11.0 19.4 39.2 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 91 7.9 14.0 53.2 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 73 6.4 11.3 64.5 OPPOSE 5 124 10.8 19.1 83.6 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 106 9.2 16.4 100.0 . 469 40.9 Missing NOT SURE 7 31 2.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 648 Missing cases 500 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ARM6A Q9, increased firearms regulation Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 276 24.0 42.7 42.7 FAVOR 2 141 12.3 21.8 64.6 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 54 4.7 8.4 72.9 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 26 2.3 4.0 76.9 OPPOSE 5 64 5.6 9.9 86.8 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 85 7.4 13.2 100.0 . 480 41.8 Missing NOT SURE 7 22 1.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 646 Missing cases 502 FLTTAX6A Q9, flat tax Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 51 4.4 8.9 8.9 FAVOR 2 64 5.6 11.1 20.0 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 68 5.9 11.8 31.9 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 31 2.7 5.4 37.3 OPPOSE 5 94 8.2 16.4 53.7 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 266 23.2 46.3 100.0 . 473 41.2 Missing NOT SURE 7 101 8.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 574 Missing cases 574 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MIISS6A Q10, most important issue in Q9: Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ABORTION 1 120 10.5 18.6 18.6 US INVOLVEMENT 2 14 1.2 2.2 20.7 TAX INCREASE 3 81 7.1 12.5 33.3 POLLUTION 4 50 4.4 7.7 41.0 IMPORTS 5 13 1.1 2.0 43.0 AFFIRMATIVE ACTION 6 12 1.0 1.9 44.9 TERM LIMITS 7 14 1.2 2.2 47.1 NATL HEALTH INSUR 8 113 9.8 17.5 64.6 PROGRAM CUTS 9 120 10.5 18.6 83.1 DOMESTIC PROGRAMS 10 27 2.4 4.2 87.3 FIREARMS 11 42 3.7 6.5 93.8 FLAT TAX 12 40 3.5 6.2 100.0 . 472 41.1 Missing 13 30 2.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 646 Missing cases 502 PRIORP6A Q11, Republican Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent TOP PRIORITY 1 181 15.8 29.0 29.0 PRIORITY 2 205 17.9 32.9 61.9 NOT A PRIORITY 3 238 20.7 38.1 100.0 . 492 42.9 Missing NOT SURE 4 32 2.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 624 Missing cases 524 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PRIODP6A Q11, Democratic Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent TOP PRIORITY 1 80 7.0 12.9 12.9 PRIORITY 2 302 26.3 48.9 61.8 NOT A PRIORITY 3 236 20.6 38.2 100.0 . 502 43.7 Missing NOT SURE 4 28 2.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 618 Missing cases 530 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PRIORE6A Q11, Reform Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent TOP PRIORITY 1 43 3.7 17.1 17.1 PRIORITY 2 87 7.6 34.7 51.8 NOT A PRIORITY 3 121 10.5 48.2 100.0 . 528 46.0 Missing NOT SURE 4 369 32.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 251 Missing cases 897 MIISLA6A Q12, Lamar Alexander Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 47 4.1 11.4 11.4 FAVOR 2 127 11.1 30.8 42.2 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 68 5.9 16.5 58.7 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 39 3.4 9.5 68.2 OPPOSE 5 79 6.9 19.2 87.4 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 52 4.5 12.6 100.0 . 551 48.0 Missing NOT SURE 7 185 16.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 412 Missing cases 736 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MIISBB6A Q12, Bill Bradley Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 29 2.5 10.5 10.5 FAVOR 2 95 8.3 34.4 44.9 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 54 4.7 19.6 64.5 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 18 1.6 6.5 71.0 OPPOSE 5 48 4.2 17.4 88.4 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 32 2.8 11.6 100.0 . 563 49.0 Missing NOT SURE 7 309 26.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 276 Missing cases 872 MIISPB6A Q12, Patrick Buchanan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 168 14.6 33.1 33.1 FAVOR 2 83 7.2 16.4 49.5 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 47 4.1 9.3 58.8 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 18 1.6 3.6 62.3 OPPOSE 5 55 4.8 10.8 73.2 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 136 11.8 26.8 100.0 . 548 47.7 Missing NOT SURE 7 93 8.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 507 Missing cases 641 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MIISBC6A Q12, Bill Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 108 9.4 19.0 19.0 FAVOR 2 136 11.8 23.9 43.0 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 79 6.9 13.9 56.9 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 28 2.4 4.9 61.8 OPPOSE 5 88 7.7 15.5 77.3 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 129 11.2 22.7 100.0 . 542 47.2 Missing NOT SURE 7 38 3.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 568 Missing cases 580 MIISRD6A Q12, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 65 5.7 11.9 11.9 FAVOR 2 151 13.2 27.7 39.6 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 95 8.3 17.4 57.0 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 51 4.4 9.3 66.3 OPPOSE 5 108 9.4 19.8 86.1 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 76 6.6 13.9 100.0 . 543 47.3 Missing NOT SURE 7 59 5.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 546 Missing cases 602 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MIISSF6A Q12, Steve Forbes Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 79 6.9 18.2 18.2 FAVOR 2 70 6.1 16.1 34.3 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 67 5.8 15.4 49.8 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 42 3.7 9.7 59.4 OPPOSE 5 88 7.7 20.3 79.7 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 88 7.7 20.3 100.0 . 549 47.8 Missing NOT SURE 7 165 14.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 434 Missing cases 714 MIISPG6A Q12, Phil Gramm Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 120 10.5 25.8 25.8 FAVOR 2 110 9.6 23.6 49.4 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 38 3.3 8.2 57.5 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 16 1.4 3.4 60.9 OPPOSE 5 54 4.7 11.6 72.5 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 128 11.1 27.5 100.0 . 556 48.4 Missing NOT SURE 7 126 11.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 466 Missing cases 682 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MIISRL6A Q12, Richard Lugar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 28 2.4 8.4 8.4 FAVOR 2 98 8.5 29.4 37.8 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 68 5.9 20.4 58.3 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 31 2.7 9.3 67.6 OPPOSE 5 65 5.7 19.5 87.1 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 43 3.7 12.9 100.0 . 559 48.7 Missing NOT SURE 7 256 22.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 333 Missing cases 815 MIIHRP6A Q12, H. Ross Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 66 5.7 21.0 21.0 FAVOR 2 72 6.3 22.9 43.8 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 35 3.0 11.1 54.9 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 26 2.3 8.3 63.2 OPPOSE 5 52 4.5 16.5 79.7 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 64 5.6 20.3 100.0 . 555 48.3 Missing NOT SURE 7 278 24.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 315 Missing cases 833 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MIISAA6A Q12, Average American voter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 57 5.0 10.3 10.3 FAVOR 2 182 15.9 32.7 43.0 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 183 15.9 32.9 75.9 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 66 5.7 11.9 87.8 OPPOSE 5 56 4.9 10.1 97.8 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 12 1.0 2.2 100.0 . 552 48.1 Missing NOT SURE 7 40 3.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 556 Missing cases 592 MIISDP6A Q12, Democratic Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 58 5.1 10.2 10.2 FAVOR 2 157 13.7 27.5 37.7 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 112 9.8 19.6 57.4 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 42 3.7 7.4 64.7 OPPOSE 5 94 8.2 16.5 81.2 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 107 9.3 18.8 100.0 . 551 48.0 Missing NOT SURE 7 27 2.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 570 Missing cases 578 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MIISRP6A Q12, Republican Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 103 9.0 18.4 18.4 FAVOR 2 156 13.6 27.9 46.3 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 65 5.7 11.6 57.9 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 33 2.9 5.9 63.7 OPPOSE 5 108 9.4 19.3 83.0 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 95 8.3 17.0 100.0 . 555 48.3 Missing NOT SURE 7 33 2.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 560 Missing cases 588 MIISRE6A Q12, Reform Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 18 1.6 10.2 10.2 FAVOR 2 44 3.8 25.0 35.2 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 41 3.6 23.3 58.5 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 23 2.0 13.1 71.6 OPPOSE 5 32 2.8 18.2 89.8 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 18 1.6 10.2 100.0 . 573 49.9 Missing NOT SURE 7 399 34.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 176 Missing cases 972 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TRUGOV6A Q13, the US government Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent JUST ABOUT ALWAYS 1 9 .8 1.3 1.3 MOST OF THE TIME 2 212 18.5 31.6 32.9 SOME OF THE TIME 3 380 33.1 56.6 89.6 ALMOST NEVER 4 63 5.5 9.4 99.0 NEVER 5 7 .6 1.0 100.0 . 477 41.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 671 Missing cases 477 APPBC6A Q14, Bill Clinton as President Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent APPROVE STRONGLY 1 112 9.8 16.7 16.7 APPROVE 2 332 28.9 49.4 66.1 DISAPPROVE 3 104 9.1 15.5 81.5 DISAPPROVE STRONGLY 4 124 10.8 18.5 100.0 . 470 40.9 Missing NOT SURE 5 6 .5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 672 Missing cases 476 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - APPNG6A Q14, Newt Gingrich as Speaker Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent APPROVE STRONGLY 1 44 3.8 6.7 6.7 APPROVE 2 146 12.7 22.3 29.0 DISAPPROVE 3 132 11.5 20.2 49.2 DISAPPROVE STRONGLY 4 333 29.0 50.8 100.0 . 469 40.9 Missing NOT SURE 5 24 2.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 655 Missing cases 493 APPRD6A Q14, Robert Dole as Sen Maj Leader Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent APPROVE STRONGLY 1 37 3.2 5.7 5.7 APPROVE 2 278 24.2 42.6 48.3 DISAPPROVE 3 238 20.7 36.5 84.8 DISAPPROVE STRONGLY 4 99 8.6 15.2 100.0 . 471 41.0 Missing NOT SURE 5 25 2.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 652 Missing cases 496 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NECON6A Q15, the nation as a whole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUCH BETTER 1 28 2.4 4.1 4.1 SOMEWHAT BETTER 2 224 19.5 33.1 37.3 ABOUT THE SAME 3 287 25.0 42.5 79.7 SOMEWHAT WORSE 4 123 10.7 18.2 97.9 MUCH WORSE 5 14 1.2 2.1 100.0 . 472 41.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 676 Missing cases 472 PECON6A Q15, you and your family Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUCH BETTER 1 37 3.2 5.5 5.5 SOMEWHAT BETTER 2 177 15.4 26.3 31.8 ABOUT THE SAME 3 345 30.1 51.3 83.1 SOMEWHAT WORSE 4 100 8.7 14.9 97.9 MUCH WORSE 5 14 1.2 2.1 100.0 . 475 41.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 673 Missing cases 475 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FNECON6A Q16, the nation as a whole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUCH BETTER 1 11 1.0 1.6 1.6 SOMEWHAT BETTER 2 150 13.1 22.3 24.0 ABOUT THE SAME 3 370 32.2 55.1 79.0 SOMEWHAT WORSE 4 129 11.2 19.2 98.2 MUCH WORSE 5 12 1.0 1.8 100.0 . 476 41.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 672 Missing cases 476 FPECON6A Q16, you and your family Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUCH BETTER 1 21 1.8 3.2 3.2 SOMEWHAT BETTER 2 147 12.8 22.1 25.2 ABOUT THE SAME 3 422 36.8 63.4 88.6 SOMEWHAT WORSE 4 69 6.0 10.4 98.9 MUCH WORSE 5 7 .6 1.1 100.0 . 482 42.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 666 Missing cases 482 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FNECPR6A Q17, How certain are you for Q16a? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY CERTAIN 1 38 3.3 5.7 5.7 CERTAIN 2 323 28.1 48.3 54.0 SOMEWHAT UNCERTAIN 3 288 25.1 43.0 97.0 VERY UNCERTAIN 4 20 1.7 3.0 100.0 . 479 41.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 669 Missing cases 479 FPECPR6A Q18, How certain are you for Q16b? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY CERTAIN 1 80 7.0 12.0 12.0 CERTAIN 2 383 33.4 57.2 69.2 SOMEWHAT UNCERTAIN 3 194 16.9 29.0 98.2 VERY UNCERTAIN 4 12 1.0 1.8 100.0 . 479 41.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 669 Missing cases 479 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCLA6A Q19, Lamar Alexander Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 2 .2 .4 .4 LIBERAL 2 10 .9 1.8 2.1 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 20 1.7 3.6 5.7 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 92 8.0 16.4 22.1 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 170 14.8 30.4 52.5 CONSERVATIVE 6 251 21.9 44.8 97.3 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 15 1.3 2.7 100.0 . 516 44.9 Missing NOT SURE 8 72 6.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 560 Missing cases 588 LCBB6A Q19, Bill Bradley Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 20 1.7 5.0 5.0 LIBERAL 2 105 9.1 26.0 30.9 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 123 10.7 30.4 61.4 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 104 9.1 25.7 87.1 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 16 1.4 4.0 91.1 CONSERVATIVE 6 28 2.4 6.9 98.0 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 8 .7 2.0 100.0 . 528 46.0 Missing NOT SURE 8 216 18.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 404 Missing cases 744 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCPB6A Q19, Patrick Buchanan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 2 .2 .3 .3 LIBERAL 2 7 .6 1.1 1.5 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 4 .3 .7 2.1 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 8 .7 1.3 3.4 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 11 1.0 1.8 5.2 CONSERVATIVE 6 82 7.1 13.3 18.5 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 501 43.6 81.5 100.0 . 510 44.4 Missing NOT SURE 8 23 2.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 615 Missing cases 533 LCBC6A Q19, Bill Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 107 9.3 16.7 16.7 LIBERAL 2 210 18.3 32.7 49.4 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 192 16.7 29.9 79.3 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 113 9.8 17.6 96.9 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 13 1.1 2.0 98.9 CONSERVATIVE 6 4 .3 .6 99.5 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 3 .3 .5 100.0 . 500 43.6 Missing NOT SURE 8 6 .5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 642 Missing cases 506 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCRD6A Q19, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 5 .4 .8 .8 LIBERAL 2 5 .4 .8 1.6 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 15 1.3 2.4 3.9 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 61 5.3 9.6 13.6 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 148 12.9 23.3 36.9 CONSERVATIVE 6 348 30.3 54.9 91.8 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 52 4.5 8.2 100.0 . 499 43.5 Missing NOT SURE 8 15 1.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 634 Missing cases 514 LCSF6A Q19, Steve Forbes Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 6 .5 1.1 1.1 LIBERAL 2 13 1.1 2.4 3.5 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 24 2.1 4.4 7.8 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 71 6.2 12.9 20.7 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 136 11.8 24.7 45.5 CONSERVATIVE 6 213 18.6 38.7 84.2 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 87 7.6 15.8 100.0 . 511 44.5 Missing NOT SURE 8 87 7.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 550 Missing cases 598 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCNG6A Q19, Newt Gingrich Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 5 .4 .8 .8 LIBERAL 2 5 .4 .8 1.6 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 3 .3 .5 2.1 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 7 .6 1.2 3.3 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 27 2.4 4.4 7.7 CONSERVATIVE 6 210 18.3 34.6 42.3 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 350 30.5 57.7 100.0 . 510 44.4 Missing NOT SURE 8 31 2.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 607 Missing cases 541 LCPG6A Q19, Phil Gramm Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 2 .2 .3 .3 LIBERAL 2 2 .2 .3 .7 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 3 .3 .5 1.2 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 13 1.1 2.3 3.5 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 47 4.1 8.1 11.6 CONSERVATIVE 6 190 16.6 32.9 44.5 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 320 27.9 55.5 100.0 . 517 45.0 Missing NOT SURE 8 54 4.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 577 Missing cases 571 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCJJ6A Q19, Jesse Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 337 29.4 57.2 57.2 LIBERAL 2 194 16.9 32.9 90.2 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 23 2.0 3.9 94.1 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 18 1.6 3.1 97.1 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 5 .4 .8 98.0 CONSERVATIVE 6 9 .8 1.5 99.5 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 3 .3 .5 100.0 . 520 45.3 Missing NOT SURE 8 39 3.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 589 Missing cases 559 LCRL6A Q19, Richard Lugar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 4 .3 .9 .9 LIBERAL 2 7 .6 1.5 2.4 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 19 1.7 4.1 6.6 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 98 8.5 21.4 27.9 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 108 9.4 23.6 51.5 CONSERVATIVE 6 201 17.5 43.9 95.4 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 21 1.8 4.6 100.0 . 524 45.6 Missing NOT SURE 8 166 14.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 458 Missing cases 690 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCHRP6A Q19, H. Ross Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 7 .6 1.5 1.5 LIBERAL 2 15 1.3 3.3 4.8 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 33 2.9 7.2 11.9 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 65 5.7 14.1 26.0 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 105 9.1 22.8 48.8 CONSERVATIVE 6 155 13.5 33.6 82.4 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 81 7.1 17.6 100.0 . 522 45.5 Missing NOT SURE 8 165 14.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 461 Missing cases 687 LCCP6A Q19, Colin Powell Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 5 .4 1.0 1.0 LIBERAL 2 22 1.9 4.6 5.6 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 66 5.7 13.7 19.3 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 215 18.7 44.7 64.0 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 110 9.6 22.9 86.9 CONSERVATIVE 6 58 5.1 12.1 99.0 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 5 .4 1.0 100.0 . 512 44.6 Missing NOT SURE 8 155 13.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 481 Missing cases 667 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCAA6A Q19, average American voter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent LIBERAL 2 7 .6 1.1 1.1 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 71 6.2 11.5 12.6 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 261 22.7 42.3 54.9 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 220 19.2 35.7 90.6 CONSERVATIVE 6 57 5.0 9.2 99.8 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 1 .1 .2 100.0 . 503 43.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 28 2.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 617 Missing cases 531 LCDP6A Q19, Democratic Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 75 6.5 11.7 11.7 LIBERAL 2 238 20.7 37.2 49.0 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 250 21.8 39.1 88.1 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 60 5.2 9.4 97.5 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 11 1.0 1.7 99.2 CONSERVATIVE 6 4 .3 .6 99.8 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 1 .1 .2 100.0 . 502 43.7 Missing NOT SURE 8 7 .6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 639 Missing cases 509 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCRP6A Q19, Republican Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 4 .3 .6 .6 LIBERAL 2 6 .5 1.0 1.6 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 2 .2 .3 1.9 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 14 1.2 2.2 4.1 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 130 11.3 20.6 24.7 CONSERVATIVE 6 339 29.5 53.7 78.4 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 136 11.8 21.6 100.0 . 502 43.7 Missing NOT SURE 8 15 1.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 631 Missing cases 517 LCUWS6A Q19, United We Stand America Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 4 .3 1.2 1.2 LIBERAL 2 11 1.0 3.3 4.6 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 14 1.2 4.3 8.8 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 41 3.6 12.5 21.3 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 78 6.8 23.7 45.0 CONSERVATIVE 6 124 10.8 37.7 82.7 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 57 5.0 17.3 100.0 . 527 45.9 Missing NOT SURE 8 292 25.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 329 Missing cases 819 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCRE6A Q19, Reform Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 2 .2 1.3 1.3 LIBERAL 2 7 .6 4.4 5.7 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 13 1.1 8.2 13.8 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 34 3.0 21.4 35.2 SLIGHTLY CONSERV 5 44 3.8 27.7 62.9 CONSERVATIVE 6 38 3.3 23.9 86.8 EXTREMELY CONSERV 7 21 1.8 13.2 100.0 . 529 46.1 Missing NOT SURE 8 460 40.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 159 Missing cases 989 EVALA6A Q20, Lamar Alexander Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 17 1.5 3.1 3.1 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 91 7.9 16.9 20.0 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 148 12.9 27.4 47.4 AVERAGE 4 173 15.1 32.0 79.4 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 56 4.9 10.4 89.8 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 31 2.7 5.7 95.6 POOR 7 24 2.1 4.4 100.0 . 526 45.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 82 7.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 540 Missing cases 608 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVABB6A Q20, Bill Bradley Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 40 3.5 9.8 9.8 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 133 11.6 32.4 42.2 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 102 8.9 24.9 67.1 AVERAGE 4 76 6.6 18.5 85.6 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 18 1.6 4.4 90.0 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 24 2.1 5.9 95.9 POOR 7 17 1.5 4.1 100.0 . 532 46.3 Missing NOT SURE 8 206 17.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 410 Missing cases 738 EVAPB6A Q20, Patrick Buchanan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 24 2.1 4.0 4.0 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 64 5.6 10.8 14.8 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 77 6.7 13.0 27.8 AVERAGE 4 49 4.3 8.2 36.0 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 59 5.1 9.9 46.0 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 98 8.5 16.5 62.5 POOR 7 223 19.4 37.5 100.0 . 530 46.2 Missing NOT SURE 8 24 2.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 594 Missing cases 554 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVABC6A Q20, Bill Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 84 7.3 13.4 13.4 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 193 16.8 30.8 44.2 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 124 10.8 19.8 64.1 AVERAGE 4 81 7.1 12.9 77.0 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 36 3.1 5.8 82.7 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 36 3.1 5.8 88.5 POOR 7 72 6.3 11.5 100.0 . 518 45.1 Missing NOT SURE 8 4 .3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 626 Missing cases 522 EVARD6A Q20, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 27 2.4 4.4 4.4 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 117 10.2 19.0 23.4 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 142 12.4 23.1 46.4 AVERAGE 4 192 16.7 31.2 77.6 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 58 5.1 9.4 87.0 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 48 4.2 7.8 94.8 POOR 7 32 2.8 5.2 100.0 . 522 45.5 Missing NOT SURE 8 10 .9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 616 Missing cases 532 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVASF6A Q20, Steve Forbes Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 3 .3 .6 .6 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 23 2.0 4.3 4.8 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 61 5.3 11.3 16.1 AVERAGE 4 91 7.9 16.8 32.9 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 111 9.7 20.5 53.4 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 117 10.2 21.6 75.0 POOR 7 135 11.8 25.0 100.0 . 530 46.2 Missing NOT SURE 8 77 6.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 541 Missing cases 607 EVAAG6A Q20, Albert Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 80 7.0 13.2 13.2 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 165 14.4 27.2 40.4 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 108 9.4 17.8 58.2 AVERAGE 4 92 8.0 15.2 73.3 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 53 4.6 8.7 82.0 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 42 3.7 6.9 89.0 POOR 7 67 5.8 11.0 100.0 . 525 45.7 Missing NOT SURE 8 16 1.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 607 Missing cases 541 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVANG6A Q20, Newt Gingrich Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 25 2.2 4.1 4.1 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 83 7.2 13.7 17.8 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 75 6.5 12.4 30.1 AVERAGE 4 58 5.1 9.6 39.7 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 63 5.5 10.4 50.1 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 77 6.7 12.7 62.8 POOR 7 226 19.7 37.2 100.0 . 523 45.6 Missing NOT SURE 8 18 1.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 607 Missing cases 541 EVAPG6A Q20, Phil Gramm Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 14 1.2 2.4 2.4 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 49 4.3 8.5 10.9 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 62 5.4 10.7 21.6 AVERAGE 4 99 8.6 17.1 38.8 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 71 6.2 12.3 51.0 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 92 8.0 15.9 67.0 POOR 7 191 16.6 33.0 100.0 . 530 46.2 Missing NOT SURE 8 40 3.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 578 Missing cases 570 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVAJJ6A Q20, Jesse Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 9 .8 1.5 1.5 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 63 5.5 10.6 12.2 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 100 8.7 16.9 29.1 AVERAGE 4 101 8.8 17.1 46.1 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 89 7.8 15.0 61.1 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 94 8.2 15.9 77.0 POOR 7 136 11.8 23.0 100.0 . 527 45.9 Missing NOT SURE 8 29 2.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 592 Missing cases 556 EVARL6A Q20, Richard Lugar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 16 1.4 3.4 3.4 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 63 5.5 13.6 17.0 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 111 9.7 23.9 40.9 AVERAGE 4 128 11.1 27.6 68.5 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 66 5.7 14.2 82.8 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 51 4.4 11.0 93.8 POOR 7 29 2.5 6.3 100.0 . 532 46.3 Missing NOT SURE 8 152 13.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 464 Missing cases 684 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVAHRP6A Q20, H. Ross Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 4 .3 .7 .7 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 17 1.5 3.1 3.9 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 54 4.7 9.9 13.8 AVERAGE 4 89 7.8 16.3 30.1 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 94 8.2 17.2 47.3 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 110 9.6 20.2 67.5 POOR 7 177 15.4 32.5 100.0 . 528 46.0 Missing NOT SURE 8 75 6.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 545 Missing cases 603 EVACP6A Q20, Colin Powell Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 44 3.8 8.7 8.7 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 116 10.1 23.1 31.8 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 149 13.0 29.6 61.4 AVERAGE 4 99 8.6 19.7 81.1 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 49 4.3 9.7 90.9 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 24 2.1 4.8 95.6 POOR 7 22 1.9 4.4 100.0 . 524 45.6 Missing NOT SURE 8 121 10.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 503 Missing cases 645 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVAAS6A Q20, Arlen Specter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 4 .3 1.0 1.0 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 27 2.4 6.7 7.6 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 59 5.1 14.5 22.2 AVERAGE 4 98 8.5 24.1 46.3 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 75 6.5 18.5 64.8 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 59 5.1 14.5 79.3 POOR 7 84 7.3 20.7 100.0 . 536 46.7 Missing NOT SURE 8 206 17.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 406 Missing cases 742 EVAHC6A Q20, Hillary Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 80 7.0 13.3 13.3 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 142 12.4 23.7 37.0 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 97 8.4 16.2 53.2 AVERAGE 4 67 5.8 11.2 64.3 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 41 3.6 6.8 71.2 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 38 3.3 6.3 77.5 POOR 7 135 11.8 22.5 100.0 . 517 45.0 Missing NOT SURE 8 31 2.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 600 Missing cases 548 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVADP6A Q20, Democratic Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 37 3.2 6.0 6.0 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 116 10.1 18.9 24.9 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 140 12.2 22.8 47.6 AVERAGE 4 143 12.5 23.3 70.9 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 56 4.9 9.1 80.0 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 56 4.9 9.1 89.1 POOR 7 67 5.8 10.9 100.0 . 525 45.7 Missing NOT SURE 8 8 .7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 615 Missing cases 533 EVARP6A Q20, Republican Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 7 .6 1.2 1.2 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 65 5.7 10.7 11.9 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 83 7.2 13.7 25.6 AVERAGE 4 132 11.5 21.8 47.4 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 111 9.7 18.3 65.7 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 98 8.5 16.2 81.8 POOR 7 110 9.6 18.2 100.0 . 528 46.0 Missing NOT SURE 8 14 1.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 606 Missing cases 542 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVAUWS6A Q20, United We Stand America Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 3 .3 .9 .9 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 5 .4 1.6 2.5 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 19 1.7 5.9 8.4 AVERAGE 4 46 4.0 14.3 22.7 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 67 5.8 20.9 43.6 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 76 6.6 23.7 67.3 POOR 7 105 9.1 32.7 100.0 . 546 47.6 Missing NOT SURE 8 281 24.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 321 Missing cases 827 EVARE6A Q20, Reform Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 3 .3 1.7 1.7 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 6 .5 3.4 5.1 AVERAGE 4 40 3.5 22.7 27.8 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 34 3.0 19.3 47.2 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 41 3.6 23.3 70.5 POOR 7 52 4.5 29.5 100.0 . 551 48.0 Missing NOT SURE 8 421 36.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 176 Missing cases 972 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVACON6A Q20, Congress Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 2 .2 .3 .3 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 25 2.2 4.2 4.5 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 58 5.1 9.7 14.3 AVERAGE 4 134 11.7 22.5 36.7 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 151 13.2 25.3 62.1 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 118 10.3 19.8 81.9 POOR 7 108 9.4 18.1 100.0 . 536 46.7 Missing NOT SURE 8 16 1.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 596 Missing cases 552 EVASC6A Q20, Supreme Court Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 7 .6 1.2 1.2 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 61 5.3 10.3 11.4 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 122 10.6 20.5 32.0 AVERAGE 4 192 16.7 32.3 64.3 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 108 9.4 18.2 82.5 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 62 5.4 10.4 92.9 POOR 7 42 3.7 7.1 100.0 . 533 46.4 Missing NOT SURE 8 21 1.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 594 Missing cases 554 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVAMIL6A Q20, US Military Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 42 3.7 7.2 7.2 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 125 10.9 21.6 28.8 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 144 12.5 24.8 53.6 AVERAGE 4 153 13.3 26.4 80.0 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 57 5.0 9.8 89.8 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 44 3.8 7.6 97.4 POOR 7 15 1.3 2.6 100.0 . 538 46.9 Missing NOT SURE 8 30 2.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 580 Missing cases 568 EVACHR6A Q20, Fundamentalist Christians Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 9 .8 1.7 1.7 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 36 3.1 6.9 8.6 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 47 4.1 9.0 17.6 AVERAGE 4 56 4.9 10.7 28.2 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 44 3.8 8.4 36.6 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 62 5.4 11.8 48.5 POOR 7 270 23.5 51.5 100.0 . 540 47.0 Missing NOT SURE 8 84 7.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 524 Missing cases 624 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVAUN6A Q20, The United Nations Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 8 .7 1.4 1.4 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 51 4.4 8.9 10.3 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 97 8.4 16.9 27.1 AVERAGE 4 165 14.4 28.7 55.8 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 97 8.4 16.9 72.7 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 68 5.9 11.8 84.5 POOR 7 89 7.8 15.5 100.0 . 534 46.5 Missing NOT SURE 8 39 3.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 575 Missing cases 573 TVLA6A Q21, Lamar Alexander Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 22 1.9 4.1 4.1 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 111 9.7 20.8 25.0 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 144 12.5 27.0 52.0 AVERAGE 4 172 15.0 32.3 84.2 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 33 2.9 6.2 90.4 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 24 2.1 4.5 94.9 POOR 7 27 2.4 5.1 100.0 . 510 44.4 Missing NOT SURE 8 105 9.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 533 Missing cases 615 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TVBB6A Q21, Bill Bradley Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 21 1.8 5.9 5.9 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 92 8.0 25.9 31.8 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 82 7.1 23.1 54.9 AVERAGE 4 89 7.8 25.1 80.0 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 31 2.7 8.7 88.7 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 11 1.0 3.1 91.8 POOR 7 29 2.5 8.2 100.0 . 526 45.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 267 23.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 355 Missing cases 793 TVPB6A Q21, Patrick Buchanan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 43 3.7 7.1 7.1 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 125 10.9 20.7 27.8 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 132 11.5 21.8 49.6 AVERAGE 4 100 8.7 16.5 66.1 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 60 5.2 9.9 76.0 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 40 3.5 6.6 82.6 POOR 7 105 9.1 17.4 100.0 . 512 44.6 Missing NOT SURE 8 31 2.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 605 Missing cases 543 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TVBC6A Q21, Bill Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 196 17.1 30.7 30.7 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 233 20.3 36.5 67.2 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 108 9.4 16.9 84.2 AVERAGE 4 55 4.8 8.6 92.8 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 16 1.4 2.5 95.3 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 15 1.3 2.4 97.6 POOR 7 15 1.3 2.4 100.0 . 499 43.5 Missing NOT SURE 8 11 1.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 638 Missing cases 510 TVRD6A Q21, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 15 1.3 2.4 2.4 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 38 3.3 6.0 8.4 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 108 9.4 17.1 25.5 AVERAGE 4 172 15.0 27.3 52.8 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 120 10.5 19.0 71.8 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 88 7.7 13.9 85.7 POOR 7 90 7.8 14.3 100.0 . 499 43.5 Missing NOT SURE 8 18 1.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 631 Missing cases 517 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TVSF6A Q21, Steve Forbes Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 6 .5 1.0 1.0 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 26 2.3 4.4 5.4 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 74 6.4 12.4 17.8 AVERAGE 4 128 11.1 21.4 39.2 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 124 10.8 20.8 60.0 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 113 9.8 18.9 78.9 POOR 7 126 11.0 21.1 100.0 . 505 44.0 Missing NOT SURE 8 46 4.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 597 Missing cases 551 TVPG6A Q21, Phil Gramm Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 4 .3 .7 .7 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 31 2.7 5.3 6.0 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 57 5.0 9.8 15.8 AVERAGE 4 124 10.8 21.3 37.2 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 101 8.8 17.4 54.6 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 103 9.0 17.7 72.3 POOR 7 161 14.0 27.7 100.0 . 513 44.7 Missing NOT SURE 8 54 4.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 581 Missing cases 567 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TVJJ6A Q21, Jesse Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 35 3.0 6.2 6.2 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 116 10.1 20.4 26.6 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 113 9.8 19.9 46.5 AVERAGE 4 111 9.7 19.5 66.0 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 72 6.3 12.7 78.7 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 47 4.1 8.3 87.0 POOR 7 74 6.4 13.0 100.0 . 516 44.9 Missing NOT SURE 8 64 5.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 568 Missing cases 580 TVRL6A Q21, Richard Lugar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 9 .8 1.9 1.9 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 40 3.5 8.5 10.4 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 62 5.4 13.1 23.5 AVERAGE 4 152 13.2 32.1 55.6 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 103 9.0 21.8 77.4 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 51 4.4 10.8 88.2 POOR 7 56 4.9 11.8 100.0 . 514 44.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 161 14.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 473 Missing cases 675 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TVHRP6A Q21, H. Ross Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 11 1.0 1.9 1.9 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 32 2.8 5.7 7.6 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVG 3 75 6.5 13.3 20.8 AVERAGE 4 112 9.8 19.8 40.6 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVG 5 108 9.4 19.1 59.7 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 84 7.3 14.8 74.6 POOR 7 144 12.5 25.4 100.0 . 515 44.9 Missing NOT SURE 8 67 5.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 566 Missing cases 582 AFFLA6A Q22a, Lamar Alexander Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 5 .4 1.4 1.4 FAVOR 2 27 2.4 7.4 8.8 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 38 3.3 10.5 19.3 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 106 9.2 29.2 48.5 OPPOSE 5 134 11.7 36.9 85.4 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 53 4.6 14.6 100.0 . 552 48.1 Missing NOT SURE 7 233 20.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 363 Missing cases 785 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AFFBB6A Q22a, Bill Bradley Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 39 3.4 12.5 12.5 FAVOR 2 151 13.2 48.2 60.7 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 84 7.3 26.8 87.5 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 19 1.7 6.1 93.6 OPPOSE 5 11 1.0 3.5 97.1 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 9 .8 2.9 100.0 . 557 48.5 Missing NOT SURE 7 278 24.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 313 Missing cases 835 AFFPB6A Q22a, Patrick Buchanan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 1 .1 .2 .2 FAVOR 2 14 1.2 2.7 2.9 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 15 1.3 2.9 5.7 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 18 1.6 3.4 9.2 OPPOSE 5 104 9.1 19.8 29.0 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 372 32.4 71.0 100.0 . 555 48.3 Missing NOT SURE 7 69 6.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 524 Missing cases 624 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AFFBC6A Q22a, Bill Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 141 12.3 25.1 25.1 FAVOR 2 268 23.3 47.7 72.8 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 132 11.5 23.5 96.3 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 16 1.4 2.8 99.1 OPPOSE 5 2 .2 .4 99.5 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 3 .3 .5 100.0 . 548 47.7 Missing NOT SURE 7 38 3.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 562 Missing cases 586 AFFRD6A Q22a, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 6 .5 1.1 1.1 FAVOR 2 32 2.8 6.1 7.3 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 64 5.6 12.3 19.5 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 147 12.8 28.2 47.7 OPPOSE 5 201 17.5 38.5 86.2 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 72 6.3 13.8 100.0 . 548 47.7 Missing NOT SURE 7 78 6.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 522 Missing cases 626 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AFFSF6A Q22a, Steve Forbes Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 2 .2 .6 .6 FAVOR 2 11 1.0 3.3 3.9 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 39 3.4 11.6 15.5 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 70 6.1 20.8 36.3 OPPOSE 5 124 10.8 36.9 73.2 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 90 7.8 26.8 100.0 . 558 48.6 Missing NOT SURE 7 254 22.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 336 Missing cases 812 AFFPG6A Q22a, Phil Gramm Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 2 .2 .4 .4 FAVOR 2 12 1.0 2.6 3.0 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 20 1.7 4.3 7.2 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 32 2.8 6.8 14.1 OPPOSE 5 143 12.5 30.5 44.6 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 260 22.6 55.4 100.0 . 559 48.7 Missing NOT SURE 7 120 10.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 469 Missing cases 679 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AFFRL6A Q22a, Richard Lugar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 3 .3 .9 .9 FAVOR 2 16 1.4 5.0 5.9 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 63 5.5 19.7 25.6 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 84 7.3 26.3 51.9 OPPOSE 5 117 10.2 36.6 88.4 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 37 3.2 11.6 100.0 . 554 48.3 Missing NOT SURE 7 274 23.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 320 Missing cases 828 AFFHRP6A Q22a, H. Ross Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 2 .2 .7 .7 FAVOR 2 11 1.0 3.6 4.2 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 26 2.3 8.5 12.7 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 50 4.4 16.3 29.0 OPPOSE 5 101 8.8 32.9 61.9 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 117 10.2 38.1 100.0 . 560 48.8 Missing NOT SURE 7 281 24.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 307 Missing cases 841 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AFFAA6A Q22a, average American voter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 4 .3 .7 .7 FAVOR 2 30 2.6 5.5 6.2 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 113 9.8 20.6 26.8 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 208 18.1 37.9 64.7 OPPOSE 5 164 14.3 29.9 94.5 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 30 2.6 5.5 100.0 . 552 48.1 Missing NOT SURE 7 47 4.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 549 Missing cases 599 AFFDP6A Q22a, Democratic Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 90 7.8 16.2 16.2 FAVOR 2 266 23.2 47.8 64.0 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 179 15.6 32.2 96.2 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 15 1.3 2.7 98.9 OPPOSE 5 4 .3 .7 99.6 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 2 .2 .4 100.0 . 557 48.5 Missing NOT SURE 7 35 3.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 556 Missing cases 592 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AFFRP6A Q22a, Republican Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 4 .3 .7 .7 FAVOR 2 14 1.2 2.6 3.3 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 32 2.8 5.9 9.3 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 99 8.6 18.3 27.6 OPPOSE 5 228 19.9 42.2 69.8 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 163 14.2 30.2 100.0 . 563 49.0 Missing NOT SURE 7 45 3.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 540 Missing cases 608 AFFRE6A Q22a, Reform Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 2 .2 1.7 1.7 FAVOR 2 6 .5 5.2 6.9 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 16 1.4 13.8 20.7 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 25 2.2 21.6 42.2 OPPOSE 5 48 4.2 41.4 83.6 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 19 1.7 16.4 100.0 . 572 49.8 Missing NOT SURE 7 460 40.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 116 Missing cases 1032 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEFLA6A Q22b, Lamar Alexander Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 60 5.2 13.4 13.4 FAVOR 2 228 19.9 50.9 64.3 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 123 10.7 27.5 91.7 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 19 1.7 4.2 96.0 OPPOSE 5 15 1.3 3.3 99.3 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 3 .3 .7 100.0 . 566 49.3 Missing NOT SURE 7 134 11.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 448 Missing cases 700 DEFBB6A Q22b, Bill Bradley Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 11 1.0 3.5 3.5 FAVOR 2 47 4.1 15.2 18.7 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 67 5.8 21.6 40.3 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 59 5.1 19.0 59.4 OPPOSE 5 93 8.1 30.0 89.4 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 33 2.9 10.6 100.0 . 568 49.5 Missing NOT SURE 7 270 23.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 310 Missing cases 838 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEFPB6A Q22b, Patrick Buchanan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 280 24.4 53.9 53.9 FAVOR 2 162 14.1 31.2 85.2 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 44 3.8 8.5 93.6 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 8 .7 1.5 95.2 OPPOSE 5 13 1.1 2.5 97.7 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 12 1.0 2.3 100.0 . 562 49.0 Missing NOT SURE 7 67 5.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 519 Missing cases 629 DEFBC6A Q22b, Bill Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 16 1.4 2.8 2.8 FAVOR 2 57 5.0 9.9 12.7 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 96 8.4 16.7 29.4 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 74 6.4 12.9 42.3 OPPOSE 5 182 15.9 31.7 74.0 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 149 13.0 26.0 100.0 . 554 48.3 Missing NOT SURE 7 20 1.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 574 Missing cases 574 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEFRD6A Q22b, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 104 9.1 18.5 18.5 FAVOR 2 263 22.9 46.8 65.3 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 134 11.7 23.8 89.1 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 37 3.2 6.6 95.7 OPPOSE 5 18 1.6 3.2 98.9 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 6 .5 1.1 100.0 . 558 48.6 Missing NOT SURE 7 28 2.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 562 Missing cases 586 DEFSF6A Q22b, Steve Forbes Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 121 10.5 28.8 28.8 FAVOR 2 153 13.3 36.4 65.2 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 86 7.5 20.5 85.7 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 28 2.4 6.7 92.4 OPPOSE 5 22 1.9 5.2 97.6 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 10 .9 2.4 100.0 . 567 49.4 Missing NOT SURE 7 161 14.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 420 Missing cases 728 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEFPG6A Q22b, Phil Gramm Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 267 23.3 53.8 53.8 FAVOR 2 157 13.7 31.7 85.5 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 47 4.1 9.5 95.0 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 6 .5 1.2 96.2 OPPOSE 5 8 .7 1.6 97.8 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 11 1.0 2.2 100.0 . 570 49.7 Missing NOT SURE 7 82 7.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 496 Missing cases 652 DEFRL6A Q22b, Richard Lugar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 50 4.4 14.1 14.1 FAVOR 2 142 12.4 40.0 54.1 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 116 10.1 32.7 86.8 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 26 2.3 7.3 94.1 OPPOSE 5 12 1.0 3.4 97.5 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 9 .8 2.5 100.0 . 574 50.0 Missing NOT SURE 7 219 19.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 355 Missing cases 793 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEFHRP6A Q22b, H. Ross Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 152 13.2 39.8 39.8 FAVOR 2 142 12.4 37.2 77.0 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 51 4.4 13.4 90.3 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 14 1.2 3.7 94.0 OPPOSE 5 12 1.0 3.1 97.1 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 11 1.0 2.9 100.0 . 569 49.6 Missing NOT SURE 7 197 17.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 382 Missing cases 766 DEFAA6A Q22b, average American voter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 18 1.6 3.2 3.2 FAVOR 2 117 10.2 21.1 24.3 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 225 19.6 40.5 64.9 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 113 9.8 20.4 85.2 OPPOSE 5 70 6.1 12.6 97.8 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 12 1.0 2.2 100.0 . 563 49.0 Missing NOT SURE 7 30 2.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 555 Missing cases 593 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEFDP6A Q22b, Democratic Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 7 .6 1.3 1.3 FAVOR 2 38 3.3 6.8 8.0 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 98 8.5 17.5 25.5 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 117 10.2 20.9 46.4 OPPOSE 5 202 17.6 36.1 82.5 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 98 8.5 17.5 100.0 . 567 49.4 Missing NOT SURE 7 21 1.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 560 Missing cases 588 DEFRP6A Q22b, Republican Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 176 15.3 31.3 31.3 FAVOR 2 248 21.6 44.1 75.4 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 105 9.1 18.7 94.1 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 18 1.6 3.2 97.3 OPPOSE 5 13 1.1 2.3 99.6 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 2 .2 .4 100.0 . 564 49.1 Missing NOT SURE 7 22 1.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 562 Missing cases 586 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEFRE6A Q22b, Reform Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 29 2.5 22.0 22.0 FAVOR 2 42 3.7 31.8 53.8 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 36 3.1 27.3 81.1 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 13 1.1 9.8 90.9 OPPOSE 5 9 .8 6.8 97.7 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 3 .3 2.3 100.0 . 579 50.4 Missing NOT SURE 7 437 38.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 132 Missing cases 1016 ABORLA6A Q22c, Lamar Alexander Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 24 2.1 7.0 7.0 FAVOR 2 101 8.8 29.3 36.2 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 88 7.7 25.5 61.7 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 51 4.4 14.8 76.5 OPPOSE 5 66 5.7 19.1 95.7 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 15 1.3 4.3 100.0 . 581 50.6 Missing NOT SURE 7 222 19.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 345 Missing cases 803 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABORBB6A Q22c, Bill Bradley Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 8 .7 2.7 2.7 FAVOR 2 18 1.6 6.1 8.8 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 20 1.7 6.7 15.5 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 23 2.0 7.7 23.2 OPPOSE 5 128 11.1 43.1 66.3 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 100 8.7 33.7 100.0 . 579 50.4 Missing NOT SURE 7 272 23.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 297 Missing cases 851 ABORPB6A Q22c, Patrick Buchanan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 442 38.5 82.5 82.5 FAVOR 2 59 5.1 11.0 93.5 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 6 .5 1.1 94.6 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 5 .4 .9 95.5 OPPOSE 5 7 .6 1.3 96.8 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 17 1.5 3.2 100.0 . 568 49.5 Missing NOT SURE 7 44 3.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 536 Missing cases 612 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABORBC6A Q22c, Bill Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 11 1.0 2.0 2.0 FAVOR 2 14 1.2 2.6 4.6 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 28 2.4 5.1 9.7 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 40 3.5 7.4 17.1 OPPOSE 5 163 14.2 30.0 47.1 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 288 25.1 52.9 100.0 . 570 49.7 Missing NOT SURE 7 34 3.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 544 Missing cases 604 ABORRD6A Q22c, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 58 5.1 11.5 11.5 FAVOR 2 174 15.2 34.4 45.8 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 157 13.7 31.0 76.9 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 70 6.1 13.8 90.7 OPPOSE 5 35 3.0 6.9 97.6 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 12 1.0 2.4 100.0 . 576 50.2 Missing NOT SURE 7 66 5.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 506 Missing cases 642 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABORSF6A Q22c, Steve Forbes Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 18 1.6 5.0 5.0 FAVOR 2 45 3.9 12.6 17.6 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 81 7.1 22.6 40.2 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 87 7.6 24.3 64.5 OPPOSE 5 109 9.5 30.4 95.0 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 18 1.6 5.0 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing NOT SURE 7 213 18.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 358 Missing cases 790 ABORPG6A Q22c, Phil Gramm Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 215 18.7 48.3 48.3 FAVOR 2 141 12.3 31.7 80.0 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 47 4.1 10.6 90.6 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 14 1.2 3.1 93.7 OPPOSE 5 9 .8 2.0 95.7 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 19 1.7 4.3 100.0 . 580 50.5 Missing NOT SURE 7 123 10.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 445 Missing cases 703 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABORRL6A Q22c, Richard Lugar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 17 1.5 5.9 5.9 FAVOR 2 77 6.7 26.8 32.8 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 88 7.7 30.7 63.4 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 52 4.5 18.1 81.5 OPPOSE 5 41 3.6 14.3 95.8 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 12 1.0 4.2 100.0 . 580 50.5 Missing NOT SURE 7 281 24.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 287 Missing cases 861 ABOHRP6A Q22c, H. Ross Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 18 1.6 8.4 8.4 FAVOR 2 25 2.2 11.7 20.1 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 35 3.0 16.4 36.4 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 49 4.3 22.9 59.3 OPPOSE 5 64 5.6 29.9 89.3 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 23 2.0 10.7 100.0 . 578 50.3 Missing NOT SURE 7 356 31.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 214 Missing cases 934 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABORAA6A Q22c, average American voter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 5 .4 .9 .9 FAVOR 2 43 3.7 7.9 8.8 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 86 7.5 15.7 24.5 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 143 12.5 26.1 50.6 OPPOSE 5 238 20.7 43.5 94.1 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 32 2.8 5.9 100.0 . 559 48.7 Missing NOT SURE 7 42 3.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 547 Missing cases 601 ABORDP6A Q22c, Democratic Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 7 .6 1.3 1.3 FAVOR 2 11 1.0 2.0 3.3 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 22 1.9 4.0 7.2 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 58 5.1 10.5 17.7 OPPOSE 5 255 22.2 46.1 63.8 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 200 17.4 36.2 100.0 . 559 48.7 Missing NOT SURE 7 36 3.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 553 Missing cases 595 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABORRP6A Q22c, Republican Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 92 8.0 16.8 16.8 FAVOR 2 244 21.3 44.7 61.5 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 140 12.2 25.6 87.2 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 46 4.0 8.4 95.6 OPPOSE 5 15 1.3 2.7 98.4 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 9 .8 1.6 100.0 . 563 49.0 Missing NOT SURE 7 39 3.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 546 Missing cases 602 ABORRE6A Q22c, Reform Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 8 .7 9.0 9.0 FAVOR 2 16 1.4 18.0 27.0 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 14 1.2 15.7 42.7 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 29 2.5 32.6 75.3 OPPOSE 5 15 1.3 16.9 92.1 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 7 .6 7.9 100.0 . 580 50.5 Missing NOT SURE 7 479 41.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 89 Missing cases 1059 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INVLA6A Q22d, Lamar Alexander Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 6 .5 1.9 1.9 FAVOR 2 49 4.3 15.6 17.5 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 103 9.0 32.8 50.3 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 68 5.9 21.7 72.0 OPPOSE 5 76 6.6 24.2 96.2 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 12 1.0 3.8 100.0 . 581 50.6 Missing NOT SURE 7 253 22.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 314 Missing cases 834 INVBB6A Q22d, Bill Bradley Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 3 .3 1.1 1.1 FAVOR 2 12 1.0 4.2 5.3 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 17 1.5 6.0 11.2 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 55 4.8 19.3 30.5 OPPOSE 5 142 12.4 49.8 80.4 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 56 4.9 19.6 100.0 . 585 51.0 Missing NOT SURE 7 278 24.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 285 Missing cases 863 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INVPB6A Q22d, Patrick Buchanan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 357 31.1 68.8 68.8 FAVOR 2 101 8.8 19.5 88.2 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 15 1.3 2.9 91.1 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 11 1.0 2.1 93.3 OPPOSE 5 14 1.2 2.7 96.0 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 21 1.8 4.0 100.0 . 569 49.6 Missing NOT SURE 7 60 5.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 519 Missing cases 629 INVBC6A Q22d, Bill Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 7 .6 1.3 1.3 FAVOR 2 18 1.6 3.3 4.6 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 25 2.2 4.6 9.2 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 59 5.1 10.8 20.0 OPPOSE 5 215 18.7 39.4 59.4 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 221 19.3 40.6 100.0 . 564 49.1 Missing NOT SURE 7 39 3.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 545 Missing cases 603 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INVRD6A Q22d, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 13 1.1 2.6 2.6 FAVOR 2 64 5.6 12.7 15.3 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 106 9.2 21.1 36.4 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 132 11.5 26.2 62.6 OPPOSE 5 146 12.7 29.0 91.7 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 42 3.7 8.3 100.0 . 571 49.7 Missing NOT SURE 7 74 6.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 503 Missing cases 645 INVSF6A Q22d, Steve Forbes Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 25 2.2 9.5 9.5 FAVOR 2 39 3.4 14.8 24.3 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 54 4.7 20.5 44.9 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 62 5.4 23.6 68.4 OPPOSE 5 59 5.1 22.4 90.9 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 24 2.1 9.1 100.0 . 581 50.6 Missing NOT SURE 7 304 26.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 263 Missing cases 885 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INVPG6A Q22d, Phil Gramm Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 96 8.4 25.2 25.2 FAVOR 2 106 9.2 27.8 53.0 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 67 5.8 17.6 70.6 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 48 4.2 12.6 83.2 OPPOSE 5 48 4.2 12.6 95.8 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 16 1.4 4.2 100.0 . 583 50.8 Missing NOT SURE 7 184 16.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 381 Missing cases 767 INVRL6A Q22d, Richard Lugar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 9 .8 2.9 2.9 FAVOR 2 35 3.0 11.4 14.4 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 56 4.9 18.3 32.7 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 61 5.3 19.9 52.6 OPPOSE 5 98 8.5 32.0 84.6 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 47 4.1 15.4 100.0 . 581 50.6 Missing NOT SURE 7 261 22.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 306 Missing cases 842 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INVHRP6A Q22d, H. Ross Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 73 6.4 24.1 24.1 FAVOR 2 92 8.0 30.4 54.5 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 51 4.4 16.8 71.3 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 42 3.7 13.9 85.1 OPPOSE 5 31 2.7 10.2 95.4 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 14 1.2 4.6 100.0 . 587 51.1 Missing NOT SURE 7 258 22.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 303 Missing cases 845 INVAA6A Q22d, average American voter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 22 1.9 4.1 4.1 FAVOR 2 107 9.3 20.1 24.2 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 223 19.4 41.8 66.0 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 112 9.8 21.0 87.1 OPPOSE 5 64 5.6 12.0 99.1 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 5 .4 .9 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing NOT SURE 7 38 3.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 533 Missing cases 615 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INVDP6A Q22d, Democratic Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 5 .4 1.0 1.0 FAVOR 2 25 2.2 4.8 5.8 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 69 6.0 13.4 19.2 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 122 10.6 23.6 42.8 OPPOSE 5 220 19.2 42.6 85.5 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 75 6.5 14.5 100.0 . 581 50.6 Missing NOT SURE 7 51 4.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 516 Missing cases 632 INVRP6A Q22d, Republican Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 40 3.5 8.0 8.0 FAVOR 2 155 13.5 30.8 38.8 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 145 12.6 28.8 67.6 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 74 6.4 14.7 82.3 OPPOSE 5 68 5.9 13.5 95.8 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 21 1.8 4.2 100.0 . 582 50.7 Missing NOT SURE 7 63 5.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 503 Missing cases 645 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INVRE6A Q22d, Reform Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 12 1.0 13.0 13.0 FAVOR 2 19 1.7 20.7 33.7 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 29 2.5 31.5 65.2 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 14 1.2 15.2 80.4 OPPOSE 5 11 1.0 12.0 92.4 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 7 .6 7.6 100.0 . 596 51.9 Missing NOT SURE 7 460 40.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 92 Missing cases 1056 DISPTY6A Q23, I dislike both parties Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 204 17.8 32.5 32.5 DISAGREE 2 311 27.1 49.6 82.1 AGREE 3 91 7.9 14.5 96.7 STRONGLY AGREE 4 21 1.8 3.3 100.0 . 505 44.0 Missing NOT SURE 5 16 1.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 627 Missing cases 521 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - JBPUOF6A Q23, good a job in public office Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 58 5.1 9.7 9.7 DISAGREE 2 161 14.0 26.8 36.5 AGREE 3 240 20.9 40.0 76.5 STRONGLY AGREE 4 141 12.3 23.5 100.0 . 508 44.3 Missing NOT SURE 5 40 3.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 600 Missing cases 548 POLCOM6A Q23, politics/government seem complicate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 158 13.8 24.8 24.8 DISAGREE 2 274 23.9 43.1 67.9 AGREE 3 173 15.1 27.2 95.1 STRONGLY AGREE 4 31 2.7 4.9 100.0 . 506 44.1 Missing NOT SURE 5 6 .5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 636 Missing cases 512 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PTYPRO6A Q23, the major parties never deliver Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 15 1.3 2.4 2.4 DISAGREE 2 275 24.0 43.9 46.3 AGREE 3 259 22.6 41.3 87.6 STRONGLY AGREE 4 78 6.8 12.4 100.0 . 508 44.3 Missing NOT SURE 5 13 1.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 627 Missing cases 521 RADICA6A Q23, our country needs radical change Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 72 6.3 11.7 11.7 DISAGREE 2 246 21.4 39.8 51.5 AGREE 3 205 17.9 33.2 84.6 STRONGLY AGREE 4 95 8.3 15.4 100.0 . 513 44.7 Missing NOT SURE 5 17 1.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 618 Missing cases 530 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TRUPEO6A Q23, most people can be trusted Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 30 2.6 4.8 4.8 DISAGREE 2 176 15.3 28.4 33.2 AGREE 3 381 33.2 61.5 94.7 STRONGLY AGREE 4 33 2.9 5.3 100.0 . 507 44.2 Missing NOT SURE 5 21 1.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 620 Missing cases 528 NEIPTY6A Q23, neither pty stands for what is impo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 83 7.2 13.6 13.6 DISAGREE 2 374 32.6 61.4 75.0 AGREE 3 113 9.8 18.6 93.6 STRONGLY AGREE 4 39 3.4 6.4 100.0 . 512 44.6 Missing NOT SURE 5 27 2.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 609 Missing cases 539 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EQUAL6A Q23, equal opportunity to succeed Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 41 3.6 6.6 6.6 DISAGREE 2 127 11.1 20.6 27.2 AGREE 3 281 24.5 45.5 72.7 STRONGLY AGREE 4 169 14.7 27.3 100.0 . 512 44.6 Missing NOT SURE 5 18 1.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 618 Missing cases 530 VOTPER6A Q23, I vote for person not party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 48 4.2 7.7 7.7 DISAGREE 2 158 13.8 25.3 33.0 AGREE 3 295 25.7 47.3 80.3 STRONGLY AGREE 4 123 10.7 19.7 100.0 . 515 44.9 Missing NOT SURE 5 9 .8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 624 Missing cases 524 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LOOKOU6A Q23, people just look out for themselves Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 15 1.3 2.4 2.4 DISAGREE 2 232 20.2 37.1 39.5 AGREE 3 316 27.5 50.5 89.9 STRONGLY AGREE 4 63 5.5 10.1 100.0 . 508 44.3 Missing NOT SURE 5 14 1.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 626 Missing cases 522 FAMTIE6A Q23, emphasis on traditional family ties Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 38 3.3 6.2 6.2 DISAGREE 2 106 9.2 17.3 23.6 AGREE 3 271 23.6 44.4 67.9 STRONGLY AGREE 4 196 17.1 32.1 100.0 . 504 43.9 Missing NOT SURE 5 33 2.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 611 Missing cases 537 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANPTY6A Q23, I support the candidates of my part Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 30 2.6 4.8 4.8 DISAGREE 2 118 10.3 19.0 23.8 AGREE 3 356 31.0 57.3 81.2 STRONGLY AGREE 4 117 10.2 18.8 100.0 . 520 45.3 Missing NOT SURE 5 7 .6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 621 Missing cases 527 WRDGOD6A Q23, the Bible is to be taken literally Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 281 24.5 46.1 46.1 DISAGREE 2 161 14.0 26.4 72.6 AGREE 3 86 7.5 14.1 86.7 STRONGLY AGREE 4 81 7.1 13.3 100.0 . 508 44.3 Missing NOT SURE 5 31 2.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 609 Missing cases 539 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DECIMM6A Q23, immigrants decreased Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 74 6.4 12.9 12.9 DISAGREE 2 200 17.4 34.8 47.7 AGREE 3 194 16.9 33.8 81.5 STRONGLY AGREE 4 106 9.2 18.5 100.0 . 504 43.9 Missing NOT SURE 5 70 6.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 574 Missing cases 574 ISOLAT6A Q23, no concern with world problems Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 243 21.2 38.8 38.8 DISAGREE 2 302 26.3 48.2 87.1 AGREE 3 64 5.6 10.2 97.3 STRONGLY AGREE 4 17 1.5 2.7 100.0 . 503 43.8 Missing NOT SURE 5 19 1.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 626 Missing cases 522 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RUNBB6A Q24, Bill Bradley Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO RUN 1 2 .2 .4 .4 PROBABLY WILL RUN 2 7 .6 1.5 1.9 LIKELY TO RUN 3 12 1.0 2.5 4.4 TOSS-UP 4 30 2.6 6.3 10.8 LIKELY NOT TO RUN 5 49 4.3 10.3 21.1 PROBABLY NOT RUN 6 213 18.6 44.9 66.0 CERTAIN NOT TO RUN 7 161 14.0 34.0 100.0 . 511 44.5 Missing NOT SURE 8 163 14.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 474 Missing cases 674 RUNJJ6A Q24, Jesse Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO RUN 1 1 .1 .2 .2 PROBABLY WILL RUN 2 13 1.1 2.3 2.5 LIKELY TO RUN 3 20 1.7 3.6 6.1 TOSS-UP 4 50 4.4 9.0 15.1 LIKELY NOT TO RUN 5 78 6.8 14.0 29.0 PROBABLY NOT RUN 6 264 23.0 47.3 76.3 CERTAIN NOT TO RUN 7 132 11.5 23.7 100.0 . 512 44.6 Missing NOT SURE 8 78 6.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 558 Missing cases 590 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RUNHRP6A Q24, H. Ross Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO RUN 1 6 .5 1.1 1.1 PROBABLY WILL RUN 2 37 3.2 6.6 7.7 LIKELY TO RUN 3 64 5.6 11.5 19.2 TOSS-UP 4 111 9.7 19.9 39.1 LIKELY NOT TO RUN 5 89 7.8 15.9 55.0 PROBABLY NOT RUN 6 179 15.6 32.1 87.1 CERTAIN NOT TO RUN 7 72 6.3 12.9 100.0 . 507 44.2 Missing NOT SURE 8 83 7.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 558 Missing cases 590 RUNOTH6A Q24, other candidate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO RUN 1 8 .7 9.2 9.2 PROBABLY WILL RUN 2 3 .3 3.4 12.6 LIKELY TO RUN 3 13 1.1 14.9 27.6 TOSS-UP 4 21 1.8 24.1 51.7 LIKELY NOT TO RUN 5 8 .7 9.2 60.9 PROBABLY NOT RUN 6 25 2.2 28.7 89.7 CERTAIN NOT TO RUN 7 9 .8 10.3 100.0 . 961 83.7 Missing NOT SURE 8 100 8.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 87 Missing cases 1061 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RUNWT6A See Q24. Write-in Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 51 4.4 100.0 100.0 . 1097 95.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 51 Missing cases 1097 NOMLA6A Q25a, Lamar Alexander Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 3 .3 .5 .5 PROBABLY WILL WIN 2 17 1.5 2.9 3.4 LIKELY TO WIN 3 63 5.5 10.6 13.9 TOSS-UP 4 146 12.7 24.5 38.4 LIKELY TO LOSE 5 107 9.3 18.0 56.4 PROBABLY WILL LOSE 6 126 11.0 21.1 77.5 CERTAIN TO LOSE 7 134 11.7 22.5 100.0 . 523 45.6 Missing NOT SURE 8 29 2.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 596 Missing cases 552 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOMPB6A Q25a, Patrick Buchanan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 6 .5 1.0 1.0 PROBABLY WILL WIN 2 23 2.0 3.8 4.8 LIKELY TO WIN 3 59 5.1 9.7 14.4 TOSS-UP 4 132 11.5 21.7 36.1 LIKELY TO LOSE 5 124 10.8 20.4 56.5 PROBABLY WILL LOSE 6 135 11.8 22.2 78.7 CERTAIN TO LOSE 7 130 11.3 21.3 100.0 . 522 45.5 Missing NOT SURE 8 17 1.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 609 Missing cases 539 NOMRD6A Q25a, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 96 8.4 15.2 15.2 PROBABLY WILL WIN 2 253 22.0 40.1 55.3 LIKELY TO WIN 3 129 11.2 20.4 75.8 TOSS-UP 4 91 7.9 14.4 90.2 LIKELY TO LOSE 5 36 3.1 5.7 95.9 PROBABLY WILL LOSE 6 21 1.8 3.3 99.2 CERTAIN TO LOSE 7 5 .4 .8 100.0 . 509 44.3 Missing NOT SURE 8 8 .7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 631 Missing cases 517 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOMSF6A Q25a, Steve Forbes Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PROBABLY WILL WIN 2 5 .4 .8 .8 LIKELY TO WIN 3 17 1.5 2.8 3.7 TOSS-UP 4 46 4.0 7.7 11.3 LIKELY TO LOSE 5 108 9.4 18.0 29.3 PROBABLY WILL LOSE 6 187 16.3 31.1 60.4 CERTAIN TO LOSE 7 238 20.7 39.6 100.0 . 523 45.6 Missing NOT SURE 8 24 2.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 601 Missing cases 547 NOMPG6A Q25a, Phil Gramm Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PROBABLY WILL WIN 2 1 .1 .2 .2 LIKELY TO WIN 3 10 .9 1.7 1.9 TOSS-UP 4 25 2.2 4.2 6.1 LIKELY TO LOSE 5 48 4.2 8.1 14.1 PROBABLY WILL LOSE 6 116 10.1 19.5 33.7 CERTAIN TO LOSE 7 394 34.3 66.3 100.0 . 527 45.9 Missing NOT SURE 8 27 2.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 594 Missing cases 554 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOMRL6A Q25a, Richard Lugar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent LIKELY TO WIN 3 3 .3 .5 .5 TOSS-UP 4 13 1.1 2.3 2.8 LIKELY TO LOSE 5 62 5.4 10.9 13.7 PROBABLY WILL LOSE 6 138 12.0 24.3 38.0 CERTAIN TO LOSE 7 352 30.7 62.0 100.0 . 524 45.6 Missing NOT SURE 8 56 4.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 568 Missing cases 580 NOVLA6A Q25b, Lamar Alexander Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 13 1.1 2.3 2.3 PROBABLY WILL WIN 2 35 3.0 6.1 8.3 LIKELY TO WIN 3 53 4.6 9.2 17.5 TOSS-UP 4 119 10.4 20.7 38.2 LIKELY TO LOSE 5 89 7.8 15.5 53.6 PROBABLY WILL LOSE 6 130 11.3 22.6 76.2 CERTAIN TO LOSE 7 137 11.9 23.8 100.0 . 544 47.4 Missing NOT SURE 8 28 2.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 576 Missing cases 572 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOVPB6A Q25b, Patrick Buchanan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 6 .5 1.0 1.0 PROBABLY WILL WIN 2 26 2.3 4.4 5.4 LIKELY TO WIN 3 40 3.5 6.8 12.2 TOSS-UP 4 54 4.7 9.2 21.4 LIKELY TO LOSE 5 72 6.3 12.2 33.6 PROBABLY WILL LOSE 6 108 9.4 18.3 51.9 CERTAIN TO LOSE 7 284 24.7 48.1 100.0 . 545 47.5 Missing NOT SURE 8 13 1.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 590 Missing cases 558 NOVBC6A Q25b, Bill Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 126 11.0 20.6 20.6 PROBABLY WILL WIN 2 217 18.9 35.5 56.1 LIKELY TO WIN 3 115 10.0 18.8 75.0 TOSS-UP 4 76 6.6 12.4 87.4 LIKELY TO LOSE 5 33 2.9 5.4 92.8 PROBABLY WILL LOSE 6 26 2.3 4.3 97.1 CERTAIN TO LOSE 7 18 1.6 2.9 100.0 . 525 45.7 Missing NOT SURE 8 12 1.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 611 Missing cases 537 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOVRD6A Q25b, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 21 1.8 3.4 3.4 PROBABLY WILL WIN 2 46 4.0 7.5 10.9 LIKELY TO WIN 3 76 6.6 12.3 23.2 TOSS-UP 4 148 12.9 24.0 47.2 LIKELY TO LOSE 5 175 15.2 28.4 75.6 PROBABLY WILL LOSE 6 104 9.1 16.9 92.5 CERTAIN TO LOSE 7 46 4.0 7.5 100.0 . 524 45.6 Missing NOT SURE 8 8 .7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 616 Missing cases 532 NOVSF6A Q25b, Steve Forbes Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 1 .1 .2 .2 PROBABLY WILL WIN 2 5 .4 .9 1.0 LIKELY TO WIN 3 17 1.5 2.9 4.0 TOSS-UP 4 43 3.7 7.4 11.3 LIKELY TO LOSE 5 89 7.8 15.3 26.6 PROBABLY WILL LOSE 6 156 13.6 26.8 53.4 CERTAIN TO LOSE 7 271 23.6 46.6 100.0 . 544 47.4 Missing NOT SURE 8 22 1.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 582 Missing cases 566 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NOVPG6A Q25b, Phil Gramm Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CERTAIN TO WIN 1 3 .3 .5 .5 PROBABLY WILL WIN 2 13 1.1 2.3 2.8 LIKELY TO WIN 3 15 1.3 2.6 5.4 TOSS-UP 4 26 2.3 4.5 9.9 LIKELY TO LOSE 5 55 4.8 9.6 19.5 PROBABLY WILL LOSE 6 91 7.9 15.9 35.4 CERTAIN TO LOSE 7 370 32.2 64.6 100.0 . 549 47.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 26 2.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 573 Missing cases 575 NOVRL6A Q25b, Richard Lugar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent PROBABLY WILL WIN 2 8 .7 1.4 1.4 LIKELY TO WIN 3 19 1.7 3.4 4.9 TOSS-UP 4 50 4.4 9.0 13.9 LIKELY TO LOSE 5 73 6.4 13.2 27.0 PROBABLY WILL LOSE 6 127 11.1 22.9 49.9 CERTAIN TO LOSE 7 278 24.2 50.1 100.0 . 542 47.2 Missing NOT SURE 8 51 4.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 555 Missing cases 593 PCDGE6A Q26a, Dem nominee, general election Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent -2 1 .1 .2 .2 23 1 .1 .2 .3 25 1 .1 .2 .5 26 1 .1 .2 .7 27 1 .1 .2 .8 30 2 .2 .3 1.2 32 2 .2 .3 1.5 33 2 .2 .3 1.8 34 1 .1 .2 2.0 35 3 .3 .5 2.5 38 2 .2 .3 2.8 39 2 .2 .3 3.2 40 17 1.5 2.8 6.0 41 2 .2 .3 6.3 42 7 .6 1.2 7.5 43 11 1.0 1.8 9.3 44 13 1.1 2.2 11.5 45 29 2.5 4.8 16.3 46 12 1.0 2.0 18.3 47 13 1.1 2.2 20.4 48 29 2.5 4.8 25.2 49 21 1.8 3.5 28.7 50 15 1.3 2.5 31.2 51 74 6.4 12.3 43.5 52 73 6.4 12.1 55.6 53 50 4.4 8.3 64.0 54 33 2.9 5.5 69.4 55 72 6.3 12.0 81.4 56 11 1.0 1.8 83.2 57 7 .6 1.2 84.4 58 9 .8 1.5 85.9 59 10 .9 1.7 87.5 60 35 3.0 5.8 93.4 62 3 .3 .5 93.9 63 1 .1 .2 94.0 65 11 1.0 1.8 95.8 66 4 .3 .7 96.5 68 3 .3 .5 97.0 70 2 .2 .3 97.3 75 5 .4 .8 98.2 77 1 .1 .2 98.3 79 1 .1 .2 98.5 80 1 .1 .2 98.7 85 1 .1 .2 98.8 88 1 .1 .2 99.0 95 1 .1 .2 99.2 PCDGE6A Q26a, Dem nominee, general election 98 1 .1 .2 99.3 99 4 .3 .7 100.0 . 546 47.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 602 Missing cases 546 PCRGE6A Q26b, Rep nominee, general election Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 1 .1 .2 .2 11 1 .1 .2 .3 15 1 .1 .2 .5 20 2 .2 .3 .8 22 1 .1 .2 1.0 25 5 .4 .8 1.8 30 7 .6 1.2 3.0 32 3 .3 .5 3.5 34 3 .3 .5 4.0 35 12 1.0 2.0 6.0 36 2 .2 .3 6.3 37 5 .4 .8 7.2 38 5 .4 .8 8.0 39 2 .2 .3 8.3 40 44 3.8 7.3 15.7 41 10 .9 1.7 17.3 42 14 1.2 2.3 19.7 43 9 .8 1.5 21.2 44 25 2.2 4.2 25.3 45 64 5.6 10.7 36.0 46 33 2.9 5.5 41.5 47 51 4.4 8.5 50.0 48 76 6.6 12.7 62.7 49 72 6.3 12.0 74.7 50 18 1.6 3.0 77.7 51 16 1.4 2.7 80.3 52 26 2.3 4.3 84.7 53 13 1.1 2.2 86.8 54 9 .8 1.5 88.3 55 27 2.4 4.5 92.8 56 5 .4 .8 93.7 57 7 .6 1.2 94.8 58 3 .3 .5 95.3 59 3 .3 .5 95.8 60 11 1.0 1.8 97.7 65 3 .3 .5 98.2 66 3 .3 .5 98.7 75 2 .2 .3 99.0 77 1 .1 .2 99.2 86 1 .1 .2 99.3 90 2 .2 .3 99.7 99 2 .2 .3 100.0 . 548 47.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 600 Missing cases 548 PCDHRP6A Q27a, Dem nominee, Perot as cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 10 1 .1 .2 .2 25 2 .2 .4 .5 26 1 .1 .2 .7 29 1 .1 .2 .9 30 11 1.0 2.0 2.9 31 2 .2 .4 3.3 32 3 .3 .5 3.8 33 5 .4 .9 4.7 34 2 .2 .4 5.1 35 14 1.2 2.5 7.6 37 1 .1 .2 7.8 38 7 .6 1.3 9.1 39 7 .6 1.3 10.4 40 55 4.8 10.0 20.4 41 11 1.0 2.0 22.4 42 21 1.8 3.8 26.2 43 34 3.0 6.2 32.4 44 22 1.9 4.0 36.4 45 59 5.1 10.7 47.1 46 26 2.3 4.7 51.8 47 25 2.2 4.5 56.4 48 43 3.7 7.8 64.2 49 19 1.7 3.5 67.6 50 54 4.7 9.8 77.5 51 12 1.0 2.2 79.6 52 15 1.3 2.7 82.4 53 12 1.0 2.2 84.5 54 10 .9 1.8 86.4 55 28 2.4 5.1 91.5 56 4 .3 .7 92.2 57 2 .2 .4 92.5 58 3 .3 .5 93.1 59 3 .3 .5 93.6 60 19 1.7 3.5 97.1 62 1 .1 .2 97.3 65 4 .3 .7 98.0 66 2 .2 .4 98.4 69 1 .1 .2 98.5 70 2 .2 .4 98.9 73 1 .1 .2 99.1 75 1 .1 .2 99.3 80 1 .1 .2 99.5 98 1 .1 .2 99.6 99 2 .2 .4 100.0 . 598 52.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 PCDHRP6A Q27a, Dem nominee, Perot as cand Valid cases 550 Missing cases 598 PCRHRP6A Q27b, Rep nominee, Perot as cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 10 1 .1 .2 .2 14 1 .1 .2 .4 15 1 .1 .2 .5 16 1 .1 .2 .7 20 8 .7 1.5 2.2 22 3 .3 .5 2.7 23 2 .2 .4 3.1 24 2 .2 .4 3.5 25 3 .3 .5 4.0 26 1 .1 .2 4.2 28 3 .3 .5 4.7 29 3 .3 .5 5.3 30 45 3.9 8.2 13.5 31 6 .5 1.1 14.5 32 8 .7 1.5 16.0 33 11 1.0 2.0 18.0 34 8 .7 1.5 19.5 35 49 4.3 8.9 28.4 36 15 1.3 2.7 31.1 37 15 1.3 2.7 33.8 38 31 2.7 5.6 39.5 39 22 1.9 4.0 43.5 40 100 8.7 18.2 61.6 41 13 1.1 2.4 64.0 42 40 3.5 7.3 71.3 43 24 2.1 4.4 75.6 44 34 3.0 6.2 81.8 45 33 2.9 6.0 87.8 46 10 .9 1.8 89.6 47 12 1.0 2.2 91.8 48 7 .6 1.3 93.1 49 2 .2 .4 93.5 50 14 1.2 2.5 96.0 51 3 .3 .5 96.5 52 1 .1 .2 96.7 53 1 .1 .2 96.9 54 1 .1 .2 97.1 55 8 .7 1.5 98.5 56 1 .1 .2 98.7 59 1 .1 .2 98.9 60 2 .2 .4 99.3 65 1 .1 .2 99.5 70 1 .1 .2 99.6 80 1 .1 .2 99.8 88 1 .1 .2 100.0 PCRHRP6A Q27b, Rep nominee, Perot as cand . 598 52.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 550 Missing cases 598 PCHRP6A Q27c, H. Ross Perot, Perot as cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent -9 2 .2 .4 .4 -8 4 .3 .7 1.1 -6 1 .1 .2 1.3 -5 6 .5 1.1 2.3 -4 2 .2 .4 2.7 -3 1 .1 .2 2.9 -2 2 .2 .4 3.2 -1 4 .3 .7 4.0 0 4 .3 .7 4.7 1 4 .3 .7 5.4 2 2 .2 .4 5.8 3 9 .8 1.6 7.4 4 8 .7 1.4 8.8 5 25 2.2 4.5 13.4 6 6 .5 1.1 14.4 7 9 .8 1.6 16.1 8 17 1.5 3.1 19.1 9 10 .9 1.8 20.9 10 112 9.8 20.2 41.2 11 14 1.2 2.5 43.7 12 37 3.2 6.7 50.4 13 9 .8 1.6 52.0 14 14 1.2 2.5 54.5 15 74 6.4 13.4 67.9 16 10 .9 1.8 69.7 17 12 1.0 2.2 71.8 18 12 1.0 2.2 74.0 19 14 1.2 2.5 76.5 20 54 4.7 9.7 86.3 21 5 .4 .9 87.2 22 10 .9 1.8 89.0 23 9 .8 1.6 90.6 24 3 .3 .5 91.2 25 25 2.2 4.5 95.7 26 2 .2 .4 96.0 27 2 .2 .4 96.4 28 1 .1 .2 96.6 29 1 .1 .2 96.8 30 9 .8 1.6 98.4 33 2 .2 .4 98.7 36 2 .2 .4 99.1 38 1 .1 .2 99.3 40 1 .1 .2 99.5 42 1 .1 .2 99.6 43 1 .1 .2 99.8 PCHRP6A Q27c, H. Ross Perot, Perot as cand 44 1 .1 .2 100.0 . 594 51.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 554 Missing cases 594 PCDJJ6A Q28a, Dem nominee, Jackson as cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 15 2 .2 .4 .4 19 1 .1 .2 .6 20 3 .3 .6 1.1 22 2 .2 .4 1.5 23 1 .1 .2 1.7 25 5 .4 .9 2.6 28 1 .1 .2 2.8 30 12 1.0 2.2 5.0 31 3 .3 .6 5.6 32 6 .5 1.1 6.7 33 2 .2 .4 7.1 34 4 .3 .7 7.8 35 22 1.9 4.1 11.9 36 2 .2 .4 12.3 37 6 .5 1.1 13.4 38 11 1.0 2.1 15.5 39 7 .6 1.3 16.8 40 72 6.3 13.4 30.2 41 12 1.0 2.2 32.5 42 12 1.0 2.2 34.7 43 27 2.4 5.0 39.7 44 22 1.9 4.1 43.8 45 55 4.8 10.3 54.1 46 28 2.4 5.2 59.3 47 26 2.3 4.9 64.2 48 30 2.6 5.6 69.8 49 9 .8 1.7 71.5 50 66 5.7 12.3 83.8 51 13 1.1 2.4 86.2 52 9 .8 1.7 87.9 53 8 .7 1.5 89.4 54 8 .7 1.5 90.9 55 21 1.8 3.9 94.8 56 2 .2 .4 95.1 57 1 .1 .2 95.3 58 3 .3 .6 95.9 59 3 .3 .6 96.5 60 9 .8 1.7 98.1 61 1 .1 .2 98.3 65 3 .3 .6 98.9 70 2 .2 .4 99.3 75 1 .1 .2 99.4 77 1 .1 .2 99.6 90 1 .1 .2 99.8 98 1 .1 .2 100.0 PCDJJ6A Q28a, Dem nominee, Jackson as cand . 612 53.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 536 Missing cases 612 PCRJJ6A Q28b, Rep nominee, Jackson as cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent -3 1 .1 .2 .2 10 2 .2 .4 .6 18 1 .1 .2 .7 20 5 .4 .9 1.7 22 1 .1 .2 1.9 23 1 .1 .2 2.1 24 1 .1 .2 2.2 25 3 .3 .6 2.8 27 1 .1 .2 3.0 29 2 .2 .4 3.4 30 19 1.7 3.6 6.9 31 1 .1 .2 7.1 32 3 .3 .6 7.7 33 9 .8 1.7 9.3 34 4 .3 .7 10.1 35 21 1.8 3.9 14.0 36 3 .3 .6 14.6 37 5 .4 .9 15.5 38 10 .9 1.9 17.4 39 8 .7 1.5 18.9 40 59 5.1 11.0 29.9 41 7 .6 1.3 31.2 42 22 1.9 4.1 35.3 43 23 2.0 4.3 39.6 44 25 2.2 4.7 44.3 45 57 5.0 10.7 55.0 46 27 2.4 5.0 60.0 47 30 2.6 5.6 65.6 48 42 3.7 7.9 73.5 49 23 2.0 4.3 77.8 50 45 3.9 8.4 86.2 51 11 1.0 2.1 88.2 52 10 .9 1.9 90.1 53 6 .5 1.1 91.2 54 9 .8 1.7 92.9 55 16 1.4 3.0 95.9 56 1 .1 .2 96.1 57 3 .3 .6 96.6 58 2 .2 .4 97.0 59 2 .2 .4 97.4 60 7 .6 1.3 98.7 65 1 .1 .2 98.9 66 1 .1 .2 99.1 75 1 .1 .2 99.3 80 2 .2 .4 99.6 88 1 .1 .2 99.8 PCRJJ6A Q28b, Rep nominee, Jackson as cand 90 1 .1 .2 100.0 . 613 53.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 535 Missing cases 613 PCJJ6A Q28c, Jesse Jackson, Jackson as cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent -9 3 .3 .6 .6 -8 4 .3 .7 1.3 -7 6 .5 1.1 2.4 -6 5 .4 .9 3.4 -5 4 .3 .7 4.1 -4 1 .1 .2 4.3 -2 3 .3 .6 4.8 -1 2 .2 .4 5.2 0 13 1.1 2.4 7.6 1 13 1.1 2.4 10.1 2 23 2.0 4.3 14.3 3 13 1.1 2.4 16.8 4 15 1.3 2.8 19.6 5 60 5.2 11.2 30.7 6 25 2.2 4.7 35.4 7 14 1.2 2.6 38.0 8 23 2.0 4.3 42.3 9 8 .7 1.5 43.8 10 113 9.8 21.0 64.8 11 16 1.4 3.0 67.8 12 33 2.9 6.1 73.9 13 6 .5 1.1 75.0 14 5 .4 .9 76.0 15 42 3.7 7.8 83.8 16 4 .3 .7 84.5 17 3 .3 .6 85.1 18 4 .3 .7 85.8 19 3 .3 .6 86.4 20 29 2.5 5.4 91.8 21 4 .3 .7 92.6 22 4 .3 .7 93.3 23 5 .4 .9 94.2 25 14 1.2 2.6 96.8 26 1 .1 .2 97.0 27 1 .1 .2 97.2 28 3 .3 .6 97.8 30 5 .4 .9 98.7 33 1 .1 .2 98.9 34 1 .1 .2 99.1 35 1 .1 .2 99.3 40 4 .3 .7 100.0 . 611 53.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 537 Missing cases 611 PCDBB6A Q29a, Dem nominee, Bradley as cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 8 1 .1 .2 .2 19 1 .1 .2 .4 20 3 .3 .6 1.0 22 2 .2 .4 1.4 23 1 .1 .2 1.7 24 1 .1 .2 1.9 25 4 .3 .8 2.7 26 2 .2 .4 3.1 27 1 .1 .2 3.3 28 1 .1 .2 3.5 30 18 1.6 3.7 7.2 32 1 .1 .2 7.5 33 6 .5 1.2 8.7 34 2 .2 .4 9.1 35 24 2.1 5.0 14.1 36 12 1.0 2.5 16.6 37 4 .3 .8 17.4 38 15 1.3 3.1 20.5 39 7 .6 1.4 21.9 40 43 3.7 8.9 30.8 41 12 1.0 2.5 33.3 42 22 1.9 4.6 37.9 43 13 1.1 2.7 40.6 44 23 2.0 4.8 45.3 45 37 3.2 7.7 53.0 46 20 1.7 4.1 57.1 47 11 1.0 2.3 59.4 48 31 2.7 6.4 65.8 49 19 1.7 3.9 69.8 50 42 3.7 8.7 78.5 51 17 1.5 3.5 82.0 52 13 1.1 2.7 84.7 53 5 .4 1.0 85.7 54 12 1.0 2.5 88.2 55 20 1.7 4.1 92.3 56 2 .2 .4 92.8 57 2 .2 .4 93.2 58 10 .9 2.1 95.2 59 1 .1 .2 95.4 60 8 .7 1.7 97.1 65 4 .3 .8 97.9 66 1 .1 .2 98.1 69 1 .1 .2 98.3 70 1 .1 .2 98.6 75 2 .2 .4 99.0 80 1 .1 .2 99.2 PCDBB6A Q29a, Dem nominee, Bradley as cand 98 1 .1 .2 99.4 99 3 .3 .6 100.0 . 665 57.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 483 Missing cases 665 PCRBB6A Q29b, Rep nominee, Bradley as cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 5 1 .1 .2 .2 14 1 .1 .2 .4 18 1 .1 .2 .6 20 1 .1 .2 .8 22 3 .3 .6 1.4 24 1 .1 .2 1.7 25 5 .4 1.0 2.7 28 1 .1 .2 2.9 29 1 .1 .2 3.1 30 25 2.2 5.2 8.3 31 2 .2 .4 8.7 32 9 .8 1.9 10.6 33 5 .4 1.0 11.6 34 4 .3 .8 12.4 35 22 1.9 4.6 17.0 36 4 .3 .8 17.8 37 6 .5 1.2 19.0 38 10 .9 2.1 21.1 39 15 1.3 3.1 24.2 40 63 5.5 13.0 37.3 41 14 1.2 2.9 40.2 42 29 2.5 6.0 46.2 43 18 1.6 3.7 49.9 44 30 2.6 6.2 56.1 45 43 3.7 8.9 65.0 46 32 2.8 6.6 71.6 47 22 1.9 4.6 76.2 48 18 1.6 3.7 79.9 49 19 1.7 3.9 83.9 50 22 1.9 4.6 88.4 51 9 .8 1.9 90.3 52 5 .4 1.0 91.3 53 3 .3 .6 91.9 54 7 .6 1.4 93.4 55 17 1.5 3.5 96.9 57 2 .2 .4 97.3 60 7 .6 1.4 98.8 65 1 .1 .2 99.0 75 2 .2 .4 99.4 80 1 .1 .2 99.6 90 1 .1 .2 99.8 99 1 .1 .2 100.0 . 665 57.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 483 Missing cases 665 PCBB6A Q29c, Bill Bradley, Bradley as cand Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent -9 2 .2 .4 .4 -8 2 .2 .4 .8 -6 3 .3 .6 1.5 -5 5 .4 1.0 2.5 -4 5 .4 1.0 3.5 -3 3 .3 .6 4.2 -2 4 .3 .8 5.0 -1 4 .3 .8 5.8 0 31 2.7 6.5 12.3 1 21 1.8 4.4 16.7 2 16 1.4 3.3 20.0 3 13 1.1 2.7 22.7 4 8 .7 1.7 24.4 5 43 3.7 9.0 33.3 6 12 1.0 2.5 35.8 7 11 1.0 2.3 38.1 8 4 .3 .8 39.0 9 11 1.0 2.3 41.3 10 78 6.8 16.3 57.5 11 10 .9 2.1 59.6 12 18 1.6 3.8 63.3 13 6 .5 1.3 64.6 14 8 .7 1.7 66.3 15 40 3.5 8.3 74.6 16 5 .4 1.0 75.6 17 4 .3 .8 76.5 18 13 1.1 2.7 79.2 19 4 .3 .8 80.0 20 36 3.1 7.5 87.5 21 2 .2 .4 87.9 22 5 .4 1.0 89.0 23 2 .2 .4 89.4 24 1 .1 .2 89.6 25 13 1.1 2.7 92.3 26 3 .3 .6 92.9 27 2 .2 .4 93.3 28 1 .1 .2 93.5 29 3 .3 .6 94.2 30 11 1.0 2.3 96.5 33 4 .3 .8 97.3 35 4 .3 .8 98.1 37 1 .1 .2 98.3 38 2 .2 .4 98.8 39 1 .1 .2 99.0 40 3 .3 .6 99.6 48 1 .1 .2 99.8 PCBB6A Q29c, Bill Bradley, Bradley as cand 55 1 .1 .2 100.0 . 668 58.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 480 Missing cases 668 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEMVOT6A Q30a, Democratic primary or caucus Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BILL CLINTON 1 440 38.3 88.9 88.9 OTHER/WRITE-IN 2 55 4.8 11.1 100.0 . 653 56.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 495 Missing cases 653 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DVWT6A Democratic write-in Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 800 69.7 94.5 94.5 1 47 4.1 5.5 100.0 . 301 26.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 847 Missing cases 301 REPVOT6A Q30b, Republican primary or caucus Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent LAMAR ALEXANDER 1 127 11.1 25.0 25.0 PATRICK BUCHANAN 2 62 5.4 12.2 37.1 ROBERT DOLE 3 142 12.4 27.9 65.0 STEVE FORBES 4 24 2.1 4.7 69.7 PHIL GRAMM 5 21 1.8 4.1 73.9 RICHARD LUGAR 6 54 4.7 10.6 84.5 OTHER/WRITE-IN 7 79 6.9 15.5 100.0 . 639 55.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 509 Missing cases 639 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RVWT6A Republican write-in Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 773 67.3 91.3 91.3 1 74 6.4 8.7 100.0 . 301 26.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 847 Missing cases 301 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SERLA6A Q31, Lamar Alexander Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 573 49.9 67.7 67.7 CHECKED 1 274 23.9 32.3 100.0 . 301 26.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 847 Missing cases 301 SERPB6A Q31, Pat Buchanan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 445 38.8 52.5 52.5 CHECKED 1 402 35.0 47.5 100.0 . 301 26.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 847 Missing cases 301 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SERRD6A Q31, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 611 53.2 72.1 72.1 CHECKED 1 236 20.6 27.9 100.0 . 301 26.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 847 Missing cases 301 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SERSF6A Q31, Steve Forbes Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 449 39.1 53.0 53.0 CHECKED 1 398 34.7 47.0 100.0 . 301 26.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 847 Missing cases 301 SERPG6A Q31, Phil Gramm Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 464 40.4 54.8 54.8 CHECKED 1 383 33.4 45.2 100.0 . 301 26.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 847 Missing cases 301 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SERRL6A Q31, Richard Lugar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 506 44.1 59.7 59.7 CHECKED 1 341 29.7 40.3 100.0 . 301 26.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 847 Missing cases 301 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RNKLA6A Q32, Lamar Alexander Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST CHOICE 1 49 4.3 12.2 12.2 SECOND CHOICE 2 99 8.6 24.6 36.8 THIRD CHOICE 3 117 10.2 29.1 65.9 FOURTH CHOICE 4 137 11.9 34.1 100.0 . 746 65.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 402 Missing cases 746 RNKBB6A Q32, Bill Bradley Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST CHOICE 1 39 3.4 12.0 12.0 SECOND CHOICE 2 171 14.9 52.8 64.8 THIRD CHOICE 3 58 5.1 17.9 82.7 FOURTH CHOICE 4 56 4.9 17.3 100.0 . 824 71.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 324 Missing cases 824 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RNKPB6A Q32, Patrick Buchanan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST CHOICE 1 54 4.7 31.2 31.2 SECOND CHOICE 2 36 3.1 20.8 52.0 THIRD CHOICE 3 39 3.4 22.5 74.6 FOURTH CHOICE 4 44 3.8 25.4 100.0 . 975 84.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 173 Missing cases 975 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RNKBC6A Q32, Bill Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST CHOICE 1 383 33.4 80.0 80.0 SECOND CHOICE 2 49 4.3 10.2 90.2 THIRD CHOICE 3 20 1.7 4.2 94.4 FOURTH CHOICE 4 27 2.4 5.6 100.0 . 669 58.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 479 Missing cases 669 RNKRD6A Q32, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST CHOICE 1 74 6.4 17.9 17.9 SECOND CHOICE 2 107 9.3 25.8 43.7 THIRD CHOICE 3 112 9.8 27.1 70.8 FOURTH CHOICE 4 121 10.5 29.2 100.0 . 734 63.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 414 Missing cases 734 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RNKSF6A Q32, Steve Forbes Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST CHOICE 1 12 1.0 9.4 9.4 SECOND CHOICE 2 27 2.4 21.3 30.7 THIRD CHOICE 3 32 2.8 25.2 55.9 FOURTH CHOICE 4 56 4.9 44.1 100.0 . 1021 88.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 127 Missing cases 1021 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RNKPG6A Q32, Phil Gramm Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST CHOICE 1 29 2.5 18.7 18.7 SECOND CHOICE 2 29 2.5 18.7 37.4 THIRD CHOICE 3 50 4.4 32.3 69.7 FOURTH CHOICE 4 47 4.1 30.3 100.0 . 993 86.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 155 Missing cases 993 RNKJJ6A Q32, Jesse Jackson Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST CHOICE 1 7 .6 4.3 4.3 SECOND CHOICE 2 40 3.5 24.7 29.0 THIRD CHOICE 3 72 6.3 44.4 73.5 FOURTH CHOICE 4 43 3.7 26.5 100.0 . 986 85.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 162 Missing cases 986 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RNKRL6A Q32, Richard Lugar Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST CHOICE 1 16 1.4 5.9 5.9 SECOND CHOICE 2 47 4.1 17.4 23.3 THIRD CHOICE 3 92 8.0 34.1 57.4 FOURTH CHOICE 4 115 10.0 42.6 100.0 . 878 76.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 270 Missing cases 878 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RNKHRP6A Q32, H. Ross Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent FIRST CHOICE 1 2 .2 2.0 2.0 SECOND CHOICE 2 15 1.3 15.0 17.0 THIRD CHOICE 3 25 2.2 25.0 42.0 FOURTH CHOICE 4 58 5.1 58.0 100.0 . 1048 91.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 100 Missing cases 1048 POLIND6A Q33, Are you a political independent? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 284 24.7 42.1 42.1 NO 2 390 34.0 57.9 100.0 . 474 41.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 674 Missing cases 474 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - STIND6A Q33a, If so, how strongly independent? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY STRONGLY 1 89 7.8 25.0 25.0 NOT SO STRONGLY 2 180 15.7 50.6 75.6 NOT AT ALL STRONG 3 87 7.6 24.4 100.0 . 792 69.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 356 Missing cases 792 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SCHOOL6A Q34, formal schooling completed Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0-8 YEARS 1 5 .4 .7 .7 9-11 YEARS 2 11 1.0 1.6 2.4 12 YEARS 3 85 7.4 12.6 15.0 13-15 YEARS 4 142 12.4 21.0 36.0 COLLEGE GRADUATE 5 186 16.2 27.6 63.6 GRADUATE SCHOOL 6 246 21.4 36.4 100.0 . 473 41.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 675 Missing cases 473 AGE6A Q35, age Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 17-24 1 10 .9 1.5 1.5 25-29 2 9 .8 1.3 2.8 30-39 3 86 7.5 12.6 15.4 40-49 4 145 12.6 21.3 36.7 50-59 5 130 11.3 19.1 55.7 60-64 6 70 6.1 10.3 66.0 65 AND OLDER 7 232 20.2 34.0 100.0 . 466 40.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 682 Missing cases 466 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SEX6A Q36, sex Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MALE 1 371 32.3 54.5 54.5 FEMALE 2 310 27.0 45.5 100.0 . 467 40.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 681 Missing cases 467 RACE6A Q37, race Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent WHITE 1 657 57.2 96.9 96.9 BLACK/AFRICAN-AMERIC 2 12 1.0 1.8 98.7 ASIAN-AMERICAN 3 1 .1 .1 98.8 HISPANIC/LATINO 4 2 .2 .3 99.1 NATIVE AMERICAN 5 1 .1 .1 99.3 OTHER/WRITE-IN 6 5 .4 .7 100.0 . 470 40.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 678 Missing cases 470 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RACWT6A See Q37. Race write-in Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 839 73.1 99.1 99.1 1 8 .7 .9 100.0 . 301 26.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 847 Missing cases 301 INCOME6A Q38, approx family income before taxes Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNDER $20,000 1 60 5.2 9.1 9.1 $20,000-39,999 2 172 15.0 26.1 35.3 $40,000-59,999 3 181 15.8 27.5 62.8 $60,000-79,999 4 114 9.9 17.3 80.1 $80,000-99,999 5 57 5.0 8.7 88.8 OVER $100,000 6 74 6.4 11.2 100.0 . 490 42.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 658 Missing cases 490 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - REL6A Q39, religious preference Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CATHOLIC 1 117 10.2 17.3 17.3 JEWISH 2 20 1.7 3.0 20.2 PROTESTANT (INCLUDIN 3 432 37.6 63.8 84.0 NO RELIGIOUS PREFERE 4 76 6.6 11.2 95.3 OTHER/WRITE-IN 5 32 2.8 4.7 100.0 . 471 41.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 677 Missing cases 471 RELWT6A See Q39. Religion write-in Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 808 70.4 95.4 95.4 1 39 3.4 4.6 100.0 . 301 26.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 847 Missing cases 301 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HOWREL6A Q40, How religious are you? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY RELIGIOUS 1 145 12.6 21.7 21.7 FAIRLY RELIGIOUS 2 358 31.2 53.6 75.3 NOT VERY RELIGIOUS 3 101 8.8 15.1 90.4 NOT RELIGIOUS AT ALL 4 64 5.6 9.6 100.0 . 472 41.1 Missing NOT SURE 5 8 .7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 668 Missing cases 480 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BNAG6A Q41, Are you a born-again Christian? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 160 13.9 23.9 23.9 NO 2 510 44.4 76.1 100.0 . 478 41.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 670 Missing cases 478 CHRIST6A Q42, Are you a fundamentalist Christian? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 95 8.3 14.5 14.5 NO 2 562 49.0 85.5 100.0 . 491 42.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 657 Missing cases 491 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TAXCAM6A Q43, regularly mark the contributions bo Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 383 33.4 57.7 57.7 NO 2 281 24.5 42.3 100.0 . 484 42.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 664 Missing cases 484 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONTH6A Q44, month Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 1 .1 .1 .1 2 543 47.3 80.1 80.2 3 57 5.0 8.4 88.6 4 64 5.6 9.4 98.1 5 13 1.1 1.9 100.0 . 470 40.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 678 Missing cases 470 DAY6A Q44, day Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent -8 2 .2 .3 .3 -5 1 .1 .2 .5 -1 1 .1 .2 .6 1 12 1.0 1.8 2.4 2 9 .8 1.4 3.8 3 5 .4 .8 4.5 4 4 .3 .6 5.1 5 6 .5 .9 6.0 6 7 .6 1.1 7.1 7 1 .1 .2 7.2 9 3 .3 .5 7.7 10 5 .4 .8 8.4 11 10 .9 1.5 9.9 12 114 9.9 17.1 27.0 13 78 6.8 11.7 38.7 14 70 6.1 10.5 49.2 15 48 4.2 7.2 56.5 16 29 2.5 4.4 60.8 17 24 2.1 3.6 64.4 18 32 2.8 4.8 69.2 19 37 3.2 5.6 74.8 20 23 2.0 3.5 78.2 21 14 1.2 2.1 80.3 22 20 1.7 3.0 83.3 23 22 1.9 3.3 86.6 24 16 1.4 2.4 89.0 25 14 1.2 2.1 91.1 26 23 2.0 3.5 94.6 27 10 .9 1.5 96.1 28 11 1.0 1.7 97.7 29 11 1.0 1.7 99.4 30 3 .3 .5 99.8 33 1 .1 .2 100.0 . 482 42.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 666 Missing cases 482 YEAR6A Q44, year Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 6 1 .1 .2 .2 13 1 .1 .2 .3 14 1 .1 .2 .5 16 1 .1 .2 .6 17 1 .1 .2 .8 30 1 .1 .2 .9 86 1 .1 .2 1.1 95 4 .3 .6 1.7 96 654 57.0 98.3 100.0 . 483 42.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 665 Missing cases 483 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RESPON6A wave response variable Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent .00 163 14.2 19.2 19.2 CHECKED 1.00 684 59.6 80.8 100.0 . 301 26.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 847 Missing cases 301 FIRST6A ranking - first choice for president Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Lamar Alexander 1.00 48 4.2 7.3 7.3 Bill Bradley 2.00 39 3.4 5.9 13.1 Patrick Buchanan 3.00 52 4.5 7.9 21.0 Bill Clinton 4.00 383 33.4 57.9 78.9 Robert Dole 5.00 74 6.4 11.2 90.0 Steve Forbes 6.00 12 1.0 1.8 91.8 Phil Gramm 7.00 29 2.5 4.4 96.2 Jesse Jackson 8.00 7 .6 1.1 97.3 Richard Lugar 9.00 16 1.4 2.4 99.7 H. Ross Perot 10.00 2 .2 .3 100.0 . 486 42.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 662 Missing cases 486 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SECOND6A ranking - second choice for president Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Lamar Alexander 1.00 98 8.5 16.0 16.0 Bill Bradley 2.00 169 14.7 27.6 43.6 Patrick Buchanan 3.00 35 3.0 5.7 49.3 Bill Clinton 4.00 49 4.3 8.0 57.3 Robert Dole 5.00 105 9.1 17.1 74.4 Steve Forbes 6.00 27 2.4 4.4 78.8 Phil Gramm 7.00 28 2.4 4.6 83.4 Jesse Jackson 8.00 40 3.5 6.5 89.9 Richard Lugar 9.00 47 4.1 7.7 97.6 H. Ross Perot 10.00 15 1.3 2.4 100.0 . 535 46.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 613 Missing cases 535 THIRD6A ranking - third choice for president Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Lamar Alexander 1.00 112 9.8 19.0 19.0 Bill Bradley 2.00 56 4.9 9.5 28.4 Patrick Buchanan 3.00 34 3.0 5.8 34.2 Bill Clinton 4.00 18 1.6 3.0 37.2 Robert Dole 5.00 107 9.3 18.1 55.3 Steve Forbes 6.00 30 2.6 5.1 60.4 Phil Gramm 7.00 49 4.3 8.3 68.7 Jesse Jackson 8.00 68 5.9 11.5 80.2 Richard Lugar 9.00 92 8.0 15.6 95.8 H. Ross Perot 10.00 25 2.2 4.2 100.0 . 557 48.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 591 Missing cases 557 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FOURTH6A ranking - fourth choice for president Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Lamar Alexander 1.00 115 10.0 20.5 20.5 Bill Bradley 2.00 36 3.1 6.4 26.9 Patrick Buchanan 3.00 31 2.7 5.5 32.4 Bill Clinton 4.00 18 1.6 3.2 35.7 Robert Dole 5.00 112 9.8 20.0 55.6 Steve Forbes 6.00 40 3.5 7.1 62.7 Phil Gramm 7.00 28 2.4 5.0 67.7 Jesse Jackson 8.00 25 2.2 4.5 72.2 Richard Lugar 9.00 98 8.5 17.5 89.7 H. Ross Perot 10.00 58 5.1 10.3 100.0 . 587 51.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 561 Missing cases 587 **********1996 Post-election Wave********** INTGE6B Q1, the general election for President Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY INTERESTED 1 398 34.7 70.7 70.7 2 81 7.1 14.4 85.1 3 38 3.3 6.7 91.8 4 28 2.4 5.0 96.8 5 11 1.0 2.0 98.8 6 5 .4 .9 99.6 NOT INTERESTED 7 2 .2 .4 100.0 . 585 51.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 563 Missing cases 585 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INTHRD6B Q1, US House race in your district Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY INTERESTED 1 317 27.6 57.4 57.4 2 112 9.8 20.3 77.7 3 56 4.9 10.1 87.9 4 39 3.4 7.1 94.9 5 13 1.1 2.4 97.3 6 11 1.0 2.0 99.3 NOT INTERESTED 7 4 .3 .7 100.0 . 596 51.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 552 Missing cases 596 INTHRN6B Q1, US House races nationally Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY INTERESTED 1 235 20.5 43.0 43.0 2 110 9.6 20.1 63.1 3 102 8.9 18.6 81.7 4 51 4.4 9.3 91.0 5 30 2.6 5.5 96.5 6 14 1.2 2.6 99.1 NOT INTERESTED 7 5 .4 .9 100.0 . 601 52.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 547 Missing cases 601 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INTSLR6B Q1, other state and local races Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY INTERESTED 1 206 17.9 38.1 38.1 2 125 10.9 23.1 61.2 3 102 8.9 18.9 80.0 4 56 4.9 10.4 90.4 5 19 1.7 3.5 93.9 6 23 2.0 4.3 98.2 NOT INTERESTED 7 10 .9 1.8 100.0 . 607 52.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 541 Missing cases 607 HVOT966B Q2, How vote in the 1996 presidential ra Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BILL CLINTON 1 366 31.9 66.1 66.1 ROBERT DOLE 2 173 15.1 31.2 97.3 H. ROSS PEROT 3 10 .9 1.8 99.1 DID NOT VOTE 5 5 .4 .9 100.0 . 586 51.0 Missing OTHER WRITE-IN 4 8 .7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 554 Missing cases 594 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HVHR966B Q3, How vote in the 1996 House race Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE 1 355 30.9 63.7 63.7 REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE 2 196 17.1 35.2 98.9 DID NOT VOTE 5 6 .5 1.1 100.0 . 583 50.8 Missing OTHER 4 8 .7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 557 Missing cases 591 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PREFDP6B Q4, Democratic Party Preference Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BILL CLINTON 1 389 33.9 100.0 100.0 . 709 61.8 Missing OTHER WRITE-IN 2 50 4.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 389 Missing cases 759 PREFRE6B Q4, Reform Party Preference Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent RICHARD LAMM 1 144 12.5 68.6 68.6 H. ROSS PEROT 2 66 5.7 31.4 100.0 . 907 79.0 Missing OTHER WRITE-IN 3 31 2.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 210 Missing cases 938 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PREFRP6B Q4, Republican Party Preference Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent LAMAR ALEXANDER 1 117 10.2 34.1 34.1 PATRICK BUCHANAN 2 28 2.4 8.2 42.3 ROBERT DOLE 3 131 11.4 38.2 80.5 STEVE FORBES 4 29 2.5 8.5 88.9 ALAN KEYES 5 38 3.3 11.1 100.0 . 750 65.3 Missing OTHER WRITE-IN 6 55 4.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 343 Missing cases 805 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVBC6B Q5, Bill Clinton, convince friends Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 352 30.7 61.6 61.6 CHECKED 1 219 19.1 38.4 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 CLRKBC6B Q5, Bill Clinton, clerical work Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 551 48.0 96.5 96.5 CHECKED 1 20 1.7 3.5 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVBC6B Q5, Bill Clinton, canvassing Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 510 44.4 89.3 89.3 CHECKED 1 61 5.3 10.7 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LESSBC6B Q5, Bill Clinton, $100 or less Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 448 39.0 78.5 78.5 CHECKED 1 123 10.7 21.5 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 MOREBC6B Q5, Bill Clinton, more than $100 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 529 46.1 92.6 92.6 CHECKED 1 42 3.7 7.4 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LETRBC6B Q5, Bill Clinton, wrote letter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 559 48.7 97.9 97.9 CHECKED 1 12 1.0 2.1 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OTHRBC6B Q5, Bill Clinton, other activity Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 477 41.6 83.5 83.5 CHECKED 1 94 8.2 16.5 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 CONVLA6B Q5, Lamar Alexander, convince friends Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 546 47.6 95.6 95.6 CHECKED 1 25 2.2 4.4 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLRKLA6B Q5, Lamar Alexander, clerical work Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 569 49.6 99.6 99.6 CHECKED 1 2 .2 .4 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVLA6B Q5, Lamar Alexander, canvassing Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 568 49.5 99.5 99.5 CHECKED 1 3 .3 .5 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 LESSLA6B Q5, Lamar Alexander, $100 or less Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 566 49.3 99.1 99.1 CHECKED 1 5 .4 .9 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MORELA6B Q5, Lamar Alexander, more than $100 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 569 49.6 99.6 99.6 CHECKED 1 2 .2 .4 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LETRLA6B Q5, Lamar Alexander, wrote letter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 570 49.7 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 1 .1 .2 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 OTHRLA6B Q5, Lamar Alexander, other activity Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 565 49.2 98.9 98.9 CHECKED 1 6 .5 1.1 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVPB6B Q5, Patrick Buchanan, convince friends Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 554 48.3 97.0 97.0 CHECKED 1 17 1.5 3.0 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLRKPB6B Q5, Patrick Buchanan, clerical work Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 570 49.7 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 1 .1 .2 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 CANVPB6B Q5, Patrick Buchanan, canvassing Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 571 49.7 100.0 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LESSPB6B Q5, Patrick Buchanan, $100 or less Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 564 49.1 98.8 98.8 CHECKED 1 7 .6 1.2 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MOREPB6B Q5, Patrick Buchanan, more than $100 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 567 49.4 99.3 99.3 CHECKED 1 4 .3 .7 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 LETRPB6B Q5, Patrick Buchanan, wrote letter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 571 49.7 100.0 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OTHRPB6B Q5, Patrick Buchanan, other activity Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 566 49.3 99.1 99.1 CHECKED 1 5 .4 .9 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVRD6B Q5, Robert Dole, convince friends Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 499 43.5 87.4 87.4 CHECKED 1 72 6.3 12.6 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 CLRKRD6B Q5, Robert Dole, clerical work Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 565 49.2 98.9 98.9 CHECKED 1 6 .5 1.1 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVRD6B Q5, Robert Dole, canvassing Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 551 48.0 96.5 96.5 CHECKED 1 20 1.7 3.5 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LESSRD6B Q5, Robert Dole, $100 or less Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 535 46.6 93.7 93.7 CHECKED 1 36 3.1 6.3 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 MORERD6B Q5, Robert Dole, more than $100 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 564 49.1 98.8 98.8 CHECKED 1 7 .6 1.2 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LETRRD6B Q5, Robert Dole, wrote letter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 568 49.5 99.5 99.5 CHECKED 1 3 .3 .5 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OTHRRD6B Q5, Robert Dole, other activity Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 543 47.3 95.1 95.1 CHECKED 1 28 2.4 4.9 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 CONVSF6B Q5, Steve Forbes, convince friends Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 559 48.7 97.9 97.9 CHECKED 1 12 1.0 2.1 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLRKSF6B Q5, Steve Forbes, clerical work Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 571 49.7 100.0 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVSF6B Q5, Steve Forbes, canvassing Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 570 49.7 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 1 .1 .2 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 LESSSF6B Q5, Steve Forbes, $100 or less Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 571 49.7 100.0 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MORESF6B Q5, Steve Forbes, more than $100 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 571 49.7 100.0 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LETRSF6B Q5, Steve Forbes, wrote letter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 571 49.7 100.0 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 OTHRSF6B Q5, Steve Forbes, other activity Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 569 49.6 99.6 99.6 CHECKED 1 2 .2 .4 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVAK6B Q5, Alan Keyes, convince friends Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 551 48.0 96.5 96.5 CHECKED 1 20 1.7 3.5 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLRKAK6B Q5, Alan Keyes, clerical work Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 569 49.6 99.6 99.6 CHECKED 1 2 .2 .4 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 CANVAK6B Q5, Alan Keyes, canvassing Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 567 49.4 99.3 99.3 CHECKED 1 4 .3 .7 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LESSAK6B Q5, Alan Keyes, $100 or less Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 564 49.1 98.8 98.8 CHECKED 1 7 .6 1.2 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MOREAK6B Q5, Alan Keyes, more than $100 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 570 49.7 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 1 .1 .2 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 LETRAK6B Q5, Alan Keyes, wrote letter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 571 49.7 100.0 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OTHRAK6B Q5, Alan Keyes, other activity Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 565 49.2 98.9 98.9 CHECKED 1 6 .5 1.1 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVWT6B Q5, write-in, convince friends Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 558 48.6 100.0 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing CHECKED 1 13 1.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 558 Missing cases 590 CLRKWT6B Q5, write-in, clerical work Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 569 49.6 100.0 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing CHECKED 1 2 .2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 569 Missing cases 579 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVWT6B Q5, write-in, canvassing Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 568 49.5 100.0 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing CHECKED 1 3 .3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 568 Missing cases 580 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LESSWT6B Q5, write-in, $100 or less Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 566 49.3 100.0 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing CHECKED 1 5 .4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 566 Missing cases 582 MOREWT6B Q5, write-in, more than $100 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 570 49.7 100.0 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing CHECKED 1 1 .1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 570 Missing cases 578 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LETRWT6B Q5, write-in, wrote letter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 570 49.7 100.0 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing CHECKED 1 1 .1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 570 Missing cases 578 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OTHRWT6B Q5, write-in, other activity Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 561 48.9 100.0 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing CHECKED 1 10 .9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 561 Missing cases 587 PTYHRS6B Q6, hours per week to party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT INVOLVED 1 281 24.5 50.2 50.2 TWO HOURS OR LESS 2 173 15.1 30.9 81.1 THREE TO FIVE HOURS 3 67 5.8 12.0 93.0 SIX TO TEN HOURS 4 20 1.7 3.6 96.6 MORE THAN TEN HOURS 5 19 1.7 3.4 100.0 . 588 51.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 560 Missing cases 588 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - REFSIG6B Q7, signed a ballot petition Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 551 48.0 96.5 96.5 CHECKED 1 20 1.7 3.5 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - REFCOL6B Q7, collected signatures Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 568 49.5 99.5 99.5 CHECKED 1 3 .3 .5 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 REFVOT6B Q7, received ballot and voted Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 545 47.5 95.4 95.4 CHECKED 1 26 2.3 4.6 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - REFNVT6B Q7, received ballot no vote Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 558 48.6 97.7 97.7 CHECKED 1 13 1.1 2.3 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVCG6B Q8, Clinton-Gore, convince friends Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 341 29.7 59.7 59.7 CHECKED 1 230 20.0 40.3 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 CLRKCG6B Q8, Clinton-Gore, clerical work Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 546 47.6 95.6 95.6 CHECKED 1 25 2.2 4.4 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVCG6B Q8, Clinton-Gore, canvassing Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 513 44.7 89.8 89.8 CHECKED 1 58 5.1 10.2 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LESSCG6B Q8, Clinton-Gore, $100 or less Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 476 41.5 83.4 83.4 CHECKED 1 95 8.3 16.6 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 MORECG6B Q8, Clinton-Gore, more than $100 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 533 46.4 93.3 93.3 CHECKED 1 38 3.3 6.7 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LETRCG6B Q8, Clinton-Gore, wrote letter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 562 49.0 98.4 98.4 CHECKED 1 9 .8 1.6 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OTHRCG6B Q8, Clinton-Gore, other activity Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 484 42.2 84.8 84.8 CHECKED 1 87 7.6 15.2 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 CONVDK6B Q8, Dole-Kemp, convince friends Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 464 40.4 81.3 81.3 CHECKED 1 107 9.3 18.7 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLRKDK6B Q8, Dole-Kemp, clerical work Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 563 49.0 98.6 98.6 CHECKED 1 8 .7 1.4 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVDK6B Q8, Dole-Kemp, canvassing Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 550 47.9 96.3 96.3 CHECKED 1 21 1.8 3.7 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 LESSDK6B Q8, Dole-Kemp, $100 or less Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 537 46.8 94.0 94.0 CHECKED 1 34 3.0 6.0 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MOREDK6B Q8, Dole-Kemp, more than $100 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 560 48.8 98.1 98.1 CHECKED 1 11 1.0 1.9 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LETRDK6B Q8, Dole-Kemp, wrote letter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 567 49.4 99.3 99.3 CHECKED 1 4 .3 .7 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 OTHRDK6B Q8, Dole-Kemp, other activity Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 536 46.7 93.9 93.9 CHECKED 1 35 3.0 6.1 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVPC6B Q8, Perot-Choate, convince friends Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 567 49.4 99.3 99.3 CHECKED 1 4 .3 .7 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLRKPC6B Q8, Perot-Choate, clerical work Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 571 49.7 100.0 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 CANVPC6B Q8, Perot-Choate, canvassing Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 570 49.7 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 1 .1 .2 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LESSPC6B Q8, Perot-Choate, $100 or less Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 570 49.7 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 1 .1 .2 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MOREPC6B Q8, Perot-Choate, more than $100 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 571 49.7 100.0 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 LETRPC6B Q8, Perot-Choate, wrote letter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 571 49.7 100.0 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OTHRPC6B Q8, Perot-Choate, other activity Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 571 49.7 100.0 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVDH6B Q8, Dem House cand, convince friends Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 454 39.5 79.5 79.5 CHECKED 1 117 10.2 20.5 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 CLRKDH6B Q8, Dem House cand, clerical work Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 557 48.5 97.5 97.5 CHECKED 1 14 1.2 2.5 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVDH6B Q8, Dem House cand, canvassing Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 531 46.3 93.0 93.0 CHECKED 1 40 3.5 7.0 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LESSDH6B Q8, Dem House cand, $100 or less Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 524 45.6 91.8 91.8 CHECKED 1 47 4.1 8.2 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 MOREDH6B Q8, Dem House cand, more than $100 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 561 48.9 98.2 98.2 CHECKED 1 10 .9 1.8 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LETRDH6B Q8, Dem House cand, wrote letter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 566 49.3 99.1 99.1 CHECKED 1 5 .4 .9 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OTHRDH6B Q8, Dem House cand, other activity Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 523 45.6 91.6 91.6 CHECKED 1 48 4.2 8.4 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 CONVRH6B Q8, Rep House cand, convince friends Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 500 43.6 87.6 87.6 CHECKED 1 71 6.2 12.4 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLRKRH6B Q8, Rep House cand, clerical work Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 562 49.0 98.4 98.4 CHECKED 1 9 .8 1.6 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVRH6B Q8, Rep House cand, canvassing Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 556 48.4 97.4 97.4 CHECKED 1 15 1.3 2.6 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 LESSRH6B Q8, Rep House cand, $100 or less Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 546 47.6 95.6 95.6 CHECKED 1 25 2.2 4.4 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MORERH6B Q8, Rep House cand, more than $100 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 560 48.8 98.1 98.1 CHECKED 1 11 1.0 1.9 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LETRRH6B Q8, Rep House cand, wrote letter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 568 49.5 99.5 99.5 CHECKED 1 3 .3 .5 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 OTHRRH6B Q8, Rep House cand, other activity Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 544 47.4 95.3 95.3 CHECKED 1 27 2.4 4.7 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVDT6B Q8, Dem ticket, convince friends Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 443 38.6 77.6 77.6 CHECKED 1 128 11.1 22.4 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLRKDT6B Q8, Dem ticket, clerical work Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 557 48.5 97.5 97.5 CHECKED 1 14 1.2 2.5 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 CANVDT6B Q8, Dem ticket, canvassing Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 535 46.6 93.7 93.7 CHECKED 1 36 3.1 6.3 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LESSDT6B Q8, Dem ticket, $100 or less Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 514 44.8 90.0 90.0 CHECKED 1 57 5.0 10.0 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MOREDT6B Q8, Dem ticket, more than $100 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 536 46.7 93.9 93.9 CHECKED 1 35 3.0 6.1 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 LETRDT6B Q8, Dem ticket, wrote letter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 558 48.6 97.7 97.7 CHECKED 1 13 1.1 2.3 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OTHRDT6B Q8, Dem ticket, other activity Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 507 44.2 88.8 88.8 CHECKED 1 64 5.6 11.2 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONVRT6B Q8, Rep ticket, convince friends Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 503 43.8 88.1 88.1 CHECKED 1 68 5.9 11.9 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 CLRKRT6B Q8, Rep ticket, clerical work Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 563 49.0 98.6 98.6 CHECKED 1 8 .7 1.4 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVRT6B Q8, Rep ticket, canvassing Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 551 48.0 96.5 96.5 CHECKED 1 20 1.7 3.5 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LESSRT6B Q8, Rep ticket, $100 or less Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 552 48.1 96.7 96.7 CHECKED 1 19 1.7 3.3 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 MORERT6B Q8, Rep ticket, more than $100 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 558 48.6 97.7 97.7 CHECKED 1 13 1.1 2.3 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LETRRT6B Q8, Rep ticket, wrote letter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 565 49.2 98.9 98.9 CHECKED 1 6 .5 1.1 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OTHRRT6B Q8, Rep ticket, other activity Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 547 47.6 95.8 95.8 CHECKED 1 24 2.1 4.2 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 CONVRE6B Q8, Reform ticket, convince friends Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 568 49.5 99.5 99.5 CHECKED 1 3 .3 .5 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CLRKRE6B Q8, Reform ticket, clerical work Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 571 49.7 100.0 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CANVRE6B Q8, Reform ticket, canvassing Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 571 49.7 100.0 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 LESSRE6B Q8, Reform ticket, $100 or less Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 568 49.5 99.5 99.5 CHECKED 1 3 .3 .5 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MORERE6B Q8, Reform ticket, more than $100 Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 571 49.7 100.0 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LETRRE6B Q8, Reform ticket, wrote letter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 571 49.7 100.0 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 OTHRRE6B Q8, Reform ticket, other activity Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 570 49.7 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 1 .1 .2 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SLDP6B Q9, State or local Democratic Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Less than $50 1 130 11.3 11.3 11.3 $50-$100 2 78 6.8 6.8 18.1 $100-$250 3 24 2.1 2.1 20.2 $250 and above 4 10 .9 .9 21.1 Did NOT contribute 5 906 78.9 78.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1148 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SLRP6B Q9, State or local Republican Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Less than $50 1 57 5.0 5.0 5.0 $50-$100 2 28 2.4 2.4 7.4 $100-$250 3 6 .5 .5 7.9 $250 and above 4 3 .3 .3 8.2 Did NOT contribute 5 1054 91.8 91.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1148 Missing cases 0 NDP6B Q9, National Democratic Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Less than $50 1 62 5.4 5.4 5.4 $50-$100 2 47 4.1 4.1 9.5 $100-$250 3 18 1.6 1.6 11.1 $250 and above 4 10 .9 .9 11.9 Did NOT contribute 5 1011 88.1 88.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1148 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NRP6B Q9, National Republican Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Less than $50 1 40 3.5 3.5 3.5 $50-$100 2 15 1.3 1.3 4.8 $100-$250 3 9 .8 .8 5.6 Did NOT contribute 5 1084 94.4 94.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1148 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - REFP6B Q9, Reform Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Less than $50 1 2 .2 .2 .2 Did NOT contribute 5 1146 99.8 99.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1148 Missing cases 0 INVOLV6B Q10, involved in 1996 Pres campaign? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 265 23.1 49.3 49.3 NO 2 273 23.8 50.7 100.0 . 610 53.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 538 Missing cases 610 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMPPOL6B Q10a, to help own political career Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY IMPORTANT 1 5 .4 2.6 2.6 2 3 .3 1.6 4.2 3 3 .3 1.6 5.7 4 8 .7 4.2 9.9 5 3 .3 1.6 11.5 6 7 .6 3.6 15.1 NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 7 163 14.2 84.9 100.0 . 869 75.7 Missing DID NOT ANSWER 9 87 7.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 192 Missing cases 956 IMPCOB6B Q10a, to fulfill sense of obligation Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY IMPORTANT 1 96 8.4 38.4 38.4 2 61 5.3 24.4 62.8 3 45 3.9 18.0 80.8 4 24 2.1 9.6 90.4 5 11 1.0 4.4 94.8 6 7 .6 2.8 97.6 NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 7 6 .5 2.4 100.0 . 862 75.1 Missing DID NOT ANSWER 9 36 3.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 250 Missing cases 898 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMPISS6B Q10a, because of the issues Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY IMPORTANT 1 178 15.5 64.7 64.7 2 65 5.7 23.6 88.4 3 22 1.9 8.0 96.4 4 5 .4 1.8 98.2 5 2 .2 .7 98.9 6 1 .1 .4 99.3 NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 7 2 .2 .7 100.0 . 857 74.7 Missing DID NOT ANSWER 9 16 1.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 275 Missing cases 873 IMPFR6B Q10a, because of social contacts Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY IMPORTANT 1 20 1.7 9.4 9.4 2 22 1.9 10.4 19.8 3 31 2.7 14.6 34.4 4 35 3.0 16.5 50.9 5 19 1.7 9.0 59.9 6 20 1.7 9.4 69.3 NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 7 65 5.7 30.7 100.0 . 866 75.4 Missing DID NOT ANSWER 9 70 6.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 212 Missing cases 936 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMPPID6B Q10a, because of commitment to party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY IMPORTANT 1 97 8.4 37.5 37.5 2 55 4.8 21.2 58.7 3 36 3.1 13.9 72.6 4 31 2.7 12.0 84.6 5 9 .8 3.5 88.0 6 10 .9 3.9 91.9 NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 7 21 1.8 8.1 100.0 . 857 74.7 Missing DID NOT ANSWER 9 32 2.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 259 Missing cases 889 IMPORG6B Q10a, because of group membership Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY IMPORTANT 1 35 3.0 16.4 16.4 2 17 1.5 7.9 24.3 3 29 2.5 13.6 37.9 4 17 1.5 7.9 45.8 5 13 1.1 6.1 51.9 6 12 1.0 5.6 57.5 NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 7 91 7.9 42.5 100.0 . 864 75.3 Missing DID NOT ANSWER 9 70 6.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 214 Missing cases 934 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMPJOB6B Q10a, to help in own profession/job Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY IMPORTANT 1 5 .4 2.6 2.6 2 4 .3 2.0 4.6 3 8 .7 4.1 8.7 4 10 .9 5.1 13.8 5 5 .4 2.6 16.3 6 11 1.0 5.6 21.9 NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT 7 153 13.3 78.1 100.0 . 865 75.3 Missing DID NOT ANSWER 9 87 7.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 196 Missing cases 952 CONTDH6B Q11, Democratic House campaign in distri Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 269 23.4 23.4 23.4 NO 2 879 76.6 76.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1148 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTRH6B Q11, Republican House campaign in distri Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 169 14.7 14.7 14.7 NO 2 979 85.3 85.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1148 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONREH6B Q11, Reform Party House campaign in dist Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 14 1.2 1.2 1.2 NO 2 1134 98.8 98.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1148 Missing cases 0 CONTDP6B Q11, Democratic Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 329 28.7 28.7 28.7 NO 2 819 71.3 71.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1148 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTRE6B Q11, Reform Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 20 1.7 1.7 1.7 NO 2 1128 98.3 98.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1148 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONTRP6B Q11, Republican Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 216 18.8 18.8 18.8 NO 2 932 81.2 81.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1148 Missing cases 0 PTYID6B Q12, describe your party affiliation Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONG DEMOCRAT 1 259 22.6 46.3 46.3 WEAK DEMOCRAT 2 79 6.9 14.1 60.4 INDEPENDENT DEM 3 34 3.0 6.1 66.4 INDEPENDENT 4 5 .4 .9 67.3 INDEPENDENT REP 5 32 2.8 5.7 73.0 WEAK REPUBLICAN 6 38 3.3 6.8 79.8 STRONG REPUBLICAN 7 113 9.8 20.2 100.0 . 583 50.8 Missing OTHR PTY WRITE-IN 8 5 .4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 560 Missing cases 588 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LIBCON6B Q13, describe your political philosophy Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 26 2.3 4.7 4.7 LIBERAL 2 144 12.5 25.9 30.6 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 102 8.9 18.4 49.0 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 78 6.8 14.1 63.1 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 67 5.8 12.1 75.1 CONSERVATIVE 6 112 9.8 20.2 95.3 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 26 2.3 4.7 100.0 . 585 51.0 Missing OTHER WRITE-IN 8 7 .6 Missing NOT SURE 9 1 .1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 555 Missing cases 593 BETWN6B Q14, work between now and 2000: Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent IN DEM PARTY 1 192 16.7 43.4 43.4 IN REP PARTY 2 93 8.1 21.0 64.5 IN REFORM PARTY 3 1 .1 .2 64.7 IN OTHR 3RD PTY 4 7 .6 1.6 66.3 INVOLVED NO WORK 5 95 8.3 21.5 87.8 NO INVOLVEMENT 6 54 4.7 12.2 100.0 . 588 51.2 Missing NOT SURE 7 118 10.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 442 Missing cases 706 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABORT6B Q15, amendment to prohibit abortions Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 96 8.4 17.9 17.9 FAVOR 2 37 3.2 6.9 24.8 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 20 1.7 3.7 28.5 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 28 2.4 5.2 33.7 OPPOSE 5 68 5.9 12.7 46.4 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 288 25.1 53.6 100.0 . 590 51.4 Missing NOT SURE 7 21 1.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 537 Missing cases 611 INVOL6B Q15, decreased US involvement Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 41 3.6 7.7 7.7 FAVOR 2 76 6.6 14.3 22.0 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 88 7.7 16.5 38.5 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 87 7.6 16.4 54.9 OPPOSE 5 130 11.3 24.4 79.3 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 110 9.6 20.7 100.0 . 593 51.7 Missing NOT SURE 7 23 2.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 532 Missing cases 616 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEFTX6B Q15, reduce deficit, higher taxes Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 85 7.4 15.9 15.9 FAVOR 2 150 13.1 28.0 43.8 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 133 11.6 24.8 68.7 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 43 3.7 8.0 76.7 OPPOSE 5 68 5.9 12.7 89.4 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 57 5.0 10.6 100.0 . 593 51.7 Missing NOT SURE 7 19 1.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 536 Missing cases 612 IMPORT6B Q15, limits on foreign imports Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 51 4.4 9.8 9.8 FAVOR 2 95 8.3 18.3 28.1 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 107 9.3 20.6 48.7 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 84 7.3 16.2 64.9 OPPOSE 5 124 10.8 23.9 88.8 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 58 5.1 11.2 100.0 . 600 52.3 Missing NOT SURE 7 29 2.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 519 Missing cases 629 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AFFACT6B Q15, affirmative action programs Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 61 5.3 11.8 11.8 FAVOR 2 107 9.3 20.7 32.4 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 102 8.9 19.7 52.1 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 61 5.3 11.8 63.9 OPPOSE 5 89 7.8 17.2 81.1 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 98 8.5 18.9 100.0 . 600 52.3 Missing NOT SURE 7 30 2.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 518 Missing cases 630 TERM6B Q15, term limits for Congress Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 97 8.4 18.3 18.3 FAVOR 2 77 6.7 14.5 32.8 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 84 7.3 15.8 48.6 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 42 3.7 7.9 56.5 OPPOSE 5 97 8.4 18.3 74.8 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 134 11.7 25.2 100.0 . 592 51.6 Missing NOT SURE 7 25 2.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 531 Missing cases 617 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NHI6B Q15, national health insurance plan Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 130 11.3 25.1 25.1 FAVOR 2 117 10.2 22.6 47.8 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 74 6.4 14.3 62.1 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 38 3.3 7.4 69.4 OPPOSE 5 47 4.1 9.1 78.5 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 111 9.7 21.5 100.0 . 594 51.7 Missing NOT SURE 7 37 3.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 517 Missing cases 631 DEFGP6B Q15, reduce deficit, program cuts Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 91 7.9 16.9 16.9 FAVOR 2 137 11.9 25.5 42.5 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 105 9.1 19.6 62.0 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 69 6.0 12.8 74.9 OPPOSE 5 73 6.4 13.6 88.5 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 62 5.4 11.5 100.0 . 589 51.3 Missing NOT SURE 7 22 1.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 537 Missing cases 611 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SHFTST6B Q15, domestic programs to states Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 99 8.6 18.5 18.5 FAVOR 2 106 9.2 19.8 38.3 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 81 7.1 15.1 53.5 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 65 5.7 12.1 65.6 OPPOSE 5 113 9.8 21.1 86.7 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 71 6.2 13.3 100.0 . 587 51.1 Missing NOT SURE 7 26 2.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 535 Missing cases 613 ARM6B Q15, increased firearms regulation Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 240 20.9 43.9 43.9 FAVOR 2 122 10.6 22.3 66.2 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 52 4.5 9.5 75.7 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 33 2.9 6.0 81.7 OPPOSE 5 36 3.1 6.6 88.3 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 64 5.6 11.7 100.0 . 592 51.6 Missing NOT SURE 7 9 .8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 547 Missing cases 601 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SLIMIG6B Q15, stricter limits on immigrants Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 103 9.0 19.7 19.7 FAVOR 2 104 9.1 19.8 39.5 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 90 7.8 17.2 56.7 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 79 6.9 15.1 71.8 OPPOSE 5 95 8.3 18.1 89.9 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 53 4.6 10.1 100.0 . 586 51.0 Missing NOT SURE 7 38 3.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 524 Missing cases 624 MIISS6B Q15a, most important issue in Q15: Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ABORTION 1 107 9.3 20.0 20.0 US INVOLVEMENT 2 14 1.2 2.6 22.7 FEDERAL DEFICIT, TAX 3 78 6.8 14.6 37.3 IMPORTS 4 15 1.3 2.8 40.1 AFFIRMATIVE ACTION 5 15 1.3 2.8 42.9 TERM LIMITS 6 15 1.3 2.8 45.7 NATIONAL HEALTH INSU 7 102 8.9 19.1 64.8 FEDERAL DEFICIT, PRO 8 88 7.7 16.5 81.3 SHIFT DOMESTIC PROG 9 37 3.2 6.9 88.2 FIREARMS 10 40 3.5 7.5 95.7 STRICTER LIMITS ON I 11 23 2.0 4.3 100.0 . 586 51.0 Missing NOT SURE 12 28 2.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 534 Missing cases 614 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PRIORP6B Q15b, Republican Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent TOP PRIORITY 1 113 9.8 22.1 22.1 PRIORITY, BUT NOT TO 2 208 18.1 40.7 62.8 NOT A PRIORITY ITEM 3 190 16.6 37.2 100.0 . 606 52.8 Missing NOT SURE 4 31 2.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 511 Missing cases 637 PRIODP6B Q15b, Democratic Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent TOP PRIORITY 1 71 6.2 13.9 13.9 PRIORITY, BUT NOT TO 2 258 22.5 50.5 64.4 NOT A PRIORITY ITEM 3 182 15.9 35.6 100.0 . 607 52.9 Missing NOT SURE 4 30 2.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 511 Missing cases 637 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PRIORE6B Q15b, Reform Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent TOP PRIORITY 1 97 8.4 32.4 32.4 PRIORITY, BUT NOT TO 2 79 6.9 26.4 58.9 NOT A PRIORITY ITEM 3 123 10.7 41.1 100.0 . 632 55.1 Missing NOT SURE 4 217 18.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 299 Missing cases 849 MIISBC6B Q16, Bill Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 96 8.4 18.9 18.9 FAVOR 2 138 12.0 27.1 46.0 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 73 6.4 14.3 60.3 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 28 2.4 5.5 65.8 OPPOSE 5 65 5.7 12.8 78.6 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 109 9.5 21.4 100.0 . 619 53.9 Missing NOT SURE 7 20 1.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 509 Missing cases 639 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MIISRD6B Q16, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 83 7.2 16.9 16.9 FAVOR 2 133 11.6 27.1 44.0 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 59 5.1 12.0 56.0 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 46 4.0 9.4 65.4 OPPOSE 5 81 7.1 16.5 81.9 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 89 7.8 18.1 100.0 . 629 54.8 Missing NOT SURE 7 28 2.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 491 Missing cases 657 MIIHRP6B Q16, H Ross Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 91 7.9 28.7 28.7 FAVOR 2 73 6.4 23.0 51.7 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 31 2.7 9.8 61.5 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 21 1.8 6.6 68.1 OPPOSE 5 55 4.8 17.4 85.5 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 46 4.0 14.5 100.0 . 653 56.9 Missing NOT SURE 7 178 15.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 317 Missing cases 831 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MIISDH6B Q16, Democratic House candidate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 45 3.9 10.6 10.6 FAVOR 2 123 10.7 29.1 39.7 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 69 6.0 16.3 56.0 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 31 2.7 7.3 63.4 OPPOSE 5 62 5.4 14.7 78.0 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 93 8.1 22.0 100.0 . 654 57.0 Missing NOT SURE 7 71 6.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 423 Missing cases 725 MIISRH6B Q16, Republican House candidate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 92 8.0 22.0 22.0 FAVOR 2 110 9.6 26.3 48.2 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 46 4.0 11.0 59.2 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 34 3.0 8.1 67.3 OPPOSE 5 61 5.3 14.6 81.9 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 76 6.6 18.1 100.0 . 648 56.4 Missing NOT SURE 7 81 7.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 419 Missing cases 729 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MIISAA6B Q16, average American voter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 36 3.1 7.9 7.9 FAVOR 2 134 11.7 29.3 37.1 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 149 13.0 32.5 69.7 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 61 5.3 13.3 83.0 OPPOSE 5 69 6.0 15.1 98.0 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 9 .8 2.0 100.0 . 644 56.1 Missing NOT SURE 7 46 4.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 458 Missing cases 690 MIISRP6B Q16, Republican Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 79 6.9 16.4 16.4 FAVOR 2 140 12.2 29.0 45.4 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 59 5.1 12.2 57.7 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 27 2.4 5.6 63.3 OPPOSE 5 78 6.8 16.2 79.5 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 99 8.6 20.5 100.0 . 640 55.7 Missing NOT SURE 7 26 2.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 482 Missing cases 666 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MIISDP6B Q16, Democratic Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 42 3.7 8.6 8.6 FAVOR 2 130 11.3 26.6 35.2 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 88 7.7 18.0 53.2 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 44 3.8 9.0 62.2 OPPOSE 5 91 7.9 18.6 80.8 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 94 8.2 19.2 100.0 . 630 54.9 Missing NOT SURE 7 29 2.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 489 Missing cases 659 MIISRE6B Q16, Reform Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 68 5.9 27.5 27.5 FAVOR 2 65 5.7 26.3 53.8 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 31 2.7 12.6 66.4 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 14 1.2 5.7 72.1 OPPOSE 5 42 3.7 17.0 89.1 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 27 2.4 10.9 100.0 . 652 56.8 Missing NOT SURE 7 249 21.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 247 Missing cases 901 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CHAR6B Q17, characterize yourself: Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent INVOLVED CONSISTENTL 1 382 33.3 67.9 67.9 INVOLVED WORTHWHILE 2 104 9.1 18.5 86.3 NEWCOMER TO POLITICS 3 8 .7 1.4 87.7 NOT INVOLVED 4 69 6.0 12.3 100.0 . 585 51.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 563 Missing cases 585 LCBC6B Q18, Bill Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 82 7.1 15.2 15.2 LIBERAL 2 151 13.2 28.1 43.3 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 176 15.3 32.7 76.0 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 105 9.1 19.5 95.5 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 18 1.6 3.3 98.9 CONSERVATIVE 6 5 .4 .9 99.8 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 1 .1 .2 100.0 . 596 51.9 Missing NOT SURE 8 14 1.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 538 Missing cases 610 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCRD6B Q18, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 2 .2 .4 .4 LIBERAL 2 2 .2 .4 .7 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 4 .3 .7 1.5 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 42 3.7 7.8 9.3 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 123 10.7 22.8 32.0 CONSERVATIVE 6 304 26.5 56.3 88.3 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 63 5.5 11.7 100.0 . 600 52.3 Missing NOT SURE 8 8 .7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 540 Missing cases 608 LCRG6B Q18, Richard Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 85 7.4 18.2 18.2 LIBERAL 2 189 16.5 40.6 58.8 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 105 9.1 22.5 81.3 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 51 4.4 10.9 92.3 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 18 1.6 3.9 96.1 CONSERVATIVE 6 16 1.4 3.4 99.6 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 2 .2 .4 100.0 . 619 53.9 Missing NOT SURE 8 63 5.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 466 Missing cases 682 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCNG6B Q18, Newt Gingrich Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 3 .3 .6 .6 LIBERAL 2 4 .3 .8 1.4 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 2 .2 .4 1.8 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 6 .5 1.2 2.9 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 21 1.8 4.1 7.0 CONSERVATIVE 6 156 13.6 30.4 37.4 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 322 28.0 62.6 100.0 . 612 53.3 Missing NOT SURE 8 22 1.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 514 Missing cases 634 LCAG6B Q18, Al Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 95 8.3 18.1 18.1 LIBERAL 2 181 15.8 34.4 52.5 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 148 12.9 28.1 80.6 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 74 6.4 14.1 94.7 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 20 1.7 3.8 98.5 CONSERVATIVE 6 6 .5 1.1 99.6 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 2 .2 .4 100.0 . 610 53.1 Missing NOT SURE 8 12 1.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 526 Missing cases 622 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCJK6B Q18, Jack Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 2 .2 .4 .4 LIBERAL 2 2 .2 .4 .8 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 8 .7 1.6 2.4 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 47 4.1 9.5 12.0 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 136 11.8 27.6 39.6 CONSERVATIVE 6 223 19.4 45.2 84.8 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 75 6.5 15.2 100.0 . 615 53.6 Missing NOT SURE 8 40 3.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 493 Missing cases 655 LCDL6B Q18, Dick Lamm Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 7 .6 3.2 3.2 LIBERAL 2 11 1.0 5.0 8.1 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 22 1.9 10.0 18.1 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 53 4.6 24.0 42.1 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 52 4.5 23.5 65.6 CONSERVATIVE 6 54 4.7 24.4 90.0 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 22 1.9 10.0 100.0 . 656 57.1 Missing NOT SURE 8 271 23.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 221 Missing cases 927 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCHRP6B Q18, H Ross Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 4 .3 1.0 1.0 LIBERAL 2 7 .6 1.8 2.8 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 10 .9 2.5 5.3 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 48 4.2 12.0 17.3 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 97 8.4 24.3 41.6 CONSERVATIVE 6 144 12.5 36.1 77.7 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 89 7.8 22.3 100.0 . 632 55.1 Missing NOT SURE 8 117 10.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 399 Missing cases 749 LCCP6B Q18, Colin Powell Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 2 .2 .5 .5 LIBERAL 2 10 .9 2.3 2.8 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 35 3.0 8.0 10.8 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 179 15.6 41.1 52.0 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 144 12.5 33.1 85.1 CONSERVATIVE 6 60 5.2 13.8 98.9 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 5 .4 1.1 100.0 . 627 54.6 Missing NOT SURE 8 86 7.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 435 Missing cases 713 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCAA6B Q18, average American voter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent LIBERAL 2 17 1.5 3.4 3.4 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 60 5.2 11.8 15.2 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 249 21.7 49.1 64.3 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 137 11.9 27.0 91.3 CONSERVATIVE 6 42 3.7 8.3 99.6 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 2 .2 .4 100.0 . 614 53.5 Missing NOT SURE 8 27 2.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 507 Missing cases 641 LCDH6B Q18, Democratic House candidate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 64 5.6 13.1 13.1 LIBERAL 2 181 15.8 37.1 50.2 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 158 13.8 32.4 82.6 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 60 5.2 12.3 94.9 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 13 1.1 2.7 97.5 CONSERVATIVE 6 11 1.0 2.3 99.8 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 1 .1 .2 100.0 . 622 54.2 Missing NOT SURE 8 38 3.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 488 Missing cases 660 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCRH6B Q18, Republican House candidate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 2 .2 .4 .4 LIBERAL 2 5 .4 1.0 1.5 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 6 .5 1.2 2.7 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 43 3.7 8.9 11.6 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 89 7.8 18.5 30.1 CONSERVATIVE 6 233 20.3 48.3 78.4 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 104 9.1 21.6 100.0 . 618 53.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 48 4.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 482 Missing cases 666 LCDP6B Q18, Democratic Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 63 5.5 12.0 12.0 LIBERAL 2 211 18.4 40.3 52.3 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 187 16.3 35.7 88.0 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 49 4.3 9.4 97.3 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 12 1.0 2.3 99.6 CONSERVATIVE 6 2 .2 .4 100.0 . 613 53.4 Missing NOT SURE 8 11 1.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 524 Missing cases 624 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCRP6B Q18, Republican Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 2 .2 .4 .4 LIBERAL 2 1 .1 .2 .6 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 3 .3 .6 1.2 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 11 1.0 2.1 3.3 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 77 6.7 14.8 18.1 CONSERVATIVE 6 298 26.0 57.3 75.4 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 128 11.1 24.6 100.0 . 610 53.1 Missing NOT SURE 8 18 1.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 520 Missing cases 628 LCRE6B Q18, Reform Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 4 .3 1.4 1.4 LIBERAL 2 1 .1 .3 1.7 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 9 .8 3.1 4.8 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 37 3.2 12.6 17.4 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 82 7.1 28.0 45.4 CONSERVATIVE 6 100 8.7 34.1 79.5 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 60 5.2 20.5 100.0 . 625 54.4 Missing NOT SURE 8 230 20.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 293 Missing cases 855 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AFFBC6B Q19a, Bill Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 105 9.1 20.5 20.5 FAVOR 2 236 20.6 46.2 66.7 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 147 12.8 28.8 95.5 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 11 1.0 2.2 97.7 OPPOSE 5 10 .9 2.0 99.6 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 2 .2 .4 100.0 . 612 53.3 Missing NOT SURE 7 25 2.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 511 Missing cases 637 AFFRD6B Q19a, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 2 .2 .4 .4 FAVOR 2 20 1.7 4.0 4.4 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 36 3.1 7.2 11.6 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 91 7.9 18.2 29.7 OPPOSE 5 230 20.0 45.9 75.6 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 122 10.6 24.4 100.0 . 618 53.8 Missing NOT SURE 7 29 2.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 501 Missing cases 647 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AFFHRP6B Q19a, H Ross Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 1 .1 .3 .3 FAVOR 2 12 1.0 3.9 4.2 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 19 1.7 6.1 10.3 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 50 4.4 16.1 26.5 OPPOSE 5 143 12.5 46.1 72.6 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 85 7.4 27.4 100.0 . 633 55.1 Missing NOT SURE 7 205 17.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 310 Missing cases 838 AFFAA6B Q19a, average American voter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 5 .4 1.1 1.1 FAVOR 2 24 2.1 5.1 6.2 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 101 8.8 21.5 27.7 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 192 16.7 40.9 68.5 OPPOSE 5 125 10.9 26.6 95.1 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 23 2.0 4.9 100.0 . 629 54.8 Missing NOT SURE 7 49 4.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 470 Missing cases 678 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AFFDP6B Q19a, Democratic Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 87 7.6 17.4 17.4 FAVOR 2 249 21.7 49.7 67.1 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 139 12.1 27.7 94.8 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 15 1.3 3.0 97.8 OPPOSE 5 9 .8 1.8 99.6 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 2 .2 .4 100.0 . 621 54.1 Missing NOT SURE 7 26 2.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 501 Missing cases 647 AFFRP6B Q19a, Republican Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 1 .1 .2 .2 FAVOR 2 20 1.7 4.1 4.3 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 18 1.6 3.7 7.9 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 67 5.8 13.6 21.6 OPPOSE 5 242 21.1 49.3 70.9 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 143 12.5 29.1 100.0 . 622 54.2 Missing NOT SURE 7 35 3.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 491 Missing cases 657 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AFFRE6B Q19a, Reform Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 4 .3 1.8 1.8 FAVOR 2 9 .8 4.1 5.9 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 11 1.0 5.0 10.9 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 37 3.2 16.8 27.7 OPPOSE 5 106 9.2 48.2 75.9 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 53 4.6 24.1 100.0 . 637 55.5 Missing NOT SURE 7 291 25.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 220 Missing cases 928 DEFBC6B Q19b, Bill Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 11 1.0 2.1 2.1 FAVOR 2 61 5.3 11.8 14.0 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 120 10.5 23.3 37.2 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 89 7.8 17.2 54.5 OPPOSE 5 141 12.3 27.3 81.8 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 94 8.2 18.2 100.0 . 612 53.3 Missing NOT SURE 7 20 1.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 516 Missing cases 632 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEFRD6B Q19b, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 142 12.4 27.5 27.5 FAVOR 2 217 18.9 42.1 69.6 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 107 9.3 20.7 90.3 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 28 2.4 5.4 95.7 OPPOSE 5 14 1.2 2.7 98.4 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 8 .7 1.6 100.0 . 615 53.6 Missing NOT SURE 7 17 1.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 516 Missing cases 632 DEFHRP6B Q19b, H Ross Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 185 16.1 46.1 46.1 FAVOR 2 162 14.1 40.4 86.5 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 35 3.0 8.7 95.3 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 7 .6 1.7 97.0 OPPOSE 5 6 .5 1.5 98.5 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 6 .5 1.5 100.0 . 635 55.3 Missing NOT SURE 7 112 9.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 401 Missing cases 747 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEFAA6B Q19b, average American voter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 14 1.2 2.9 2.9 FAVOR 2 74 6.4 15.4 18.3 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 194 16.9 40.4 58.8 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 126 11.0 26.3 85.0 OPPOSE 5 62 5.4 12.9 97.9 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 10 .9 2.1 100.0 . 629 54.8 Missing NOT SURE 7 39 3.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 480 Missing cases 668 DEFDP6B Q19b, Democratic Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 5 .4 1.0 1.0 FAVOR 2 40 3.5 8.0 9.0 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 95 8.3 19.0 28.1 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 93 8.1 18.6 46.7 OPPOSE 5 170 14.8 34.1 80.8 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 96 8.4 19.2 100.0 . 625 54.4 Missing NOT SURE 7 24 2.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 499 Missing cases 649 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEFRP6B Q19b, Republican Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 143 12.5 28.7 28.7 FAVOR 2 225 19.6 45.1 73.7 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 80 7.0 16.0 89.8 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 22 1.9 4.4 94.2 OPPOSE 5 20 1.7 4.0 98.2 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 9 .8 1.8 100.0 . 625 54.4 Missing NOT SURE 7 24 2.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 499 Missing cases 649 DEFRE6B Q19b, Reform Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 135 11.8 44.4 44.4 FAVOR 2 107 9.3 35.2 79.6 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 42 3.7 13.8 93.4 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 9 .8 3.0 96.4 OPPOSE 5 4 .3 1.3 97.7 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 7 .6 2.3 100.0 . 639 55.7 Missing NOT SURE 7 205 17.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 304 Missing cases 844 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABOBC6B Q19c, Bill Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 11 1.0 2.1 2.1 FAVOR 2 22 1.9 4.3 6.4 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 13 1.1 2.5 8.9 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 20 1.7 3.9 12.8 OPPOSE 5 147 12.8 28.5 41.4 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 302 26.3 58.6 100.0 . 615 53.6 Missing NOT SURE 7 18 1.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 515 Missing cases 633 ABORD6B Q19c, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 118 10.3 23.7 23.7 FAVOR 2 198 17.2 39.8 63.5 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 110 9.6 22.1 85.5 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 38 3.3 7.6 93.2 OPPOSE 5 24 2.1 4.8 98.0 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 10 .9 2.0 100.0 . 620 54.0 Missing NOT SURE 7 30 2.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 498 Missing cases 650 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABOHRP6B Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 22 1.9 10.1 10.1 FAVOR 2 36 3.1 16.5 26.6 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 27 2.4 12.4 39.0 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 42 3.7 19.3 58.3 OPPOSE 5 70 6.1 32.1 90.4 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 21 1.8 9.6 100.0 . 641 55.8 Missing NOT SURE 7 289 25.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 218 Missing cases 930 ABOAA6B Q19c, average American voter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 7 .6 1.5 1.5 FAVOR 2 30 2.6 6.4 7.9 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 84 7.3 18.0 25.9 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 134 11.7 28.7 54.6 OPPOSE 5 179 15.6 38.3 92.9 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 33 2.9 7.1 100.0 . 633 55.1 Missing NOT SURE 7 48 4.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 467 Missing cases 681 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABODP6B Q19c, Democratic Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 12 1.0 2.4 2.4 FAVOR 2 15 1.3 3.0 5.4 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 19 1.7 3.8 9.2 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 35 3.0 7.0 16.3 OPPOSE 5 210 18.3 42.2 58.4 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 207 18.0 41.6 100.0 . 627 54.6 Missing NOT SURE 7 23 2.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 498 Missing cases 650 ABORP6B Q19c, Republican Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 125 10.9 25.5 25.5 FAVOR 2 208 18.1 42.4 67.8 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 107 9.3 21.8 89.6 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 20 1.7 4.1 93.7 OPPOSE 5 14 1.2 2.9 96.5 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 17 1.5 3.5 100.0 . 630 54.9 Missing NOT SURE 7 27 2.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 491 Missing cases 657 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ABORE6B Q19c, Reform Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 19 1.7 11.6 11.6 FAVOR 2 31 2.7 18.9 30.5 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 19 1.7 11.6 42.1 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 48 4.2 29.3 71.3 OPPOSE 5 39 3.4 23.8 95.1 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 8 .7 4.9 100.0 . 646 56.3 Missing NOT SURE 7 338 29.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 164 Missing cases 984 INVBC6B Q19d, Bill Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 10 .9 2.0 2.0 FAVOR 2 32 2.8 6.3 8.3 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 52 4.5 10.3 18.6 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 52 4.5 10.3 28.9 OPPOSE 5 219 19.1 43.4 72.3 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 140 12.2 27.7 100.0 . 613 53.4 Missing NOT SURE 7 30 2.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 505 Missing cases 643 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INVRD6B Q19d, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 35 3.0 7.2 7.2 FAVOR 2 95 8.3 19.6 26.8 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 111 9.7 22.9 49.7 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 87 7.6 17.9 67.6 OPPOSE 5 117 10.2 24.1 91.8 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 40 3.5 8.2 100.0 . 620 54.0 Missing NOT SURE 7 43 3.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 485 Missing cases 663 INVHRP6B Q19d, H Ross Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 76 6.6 22.1 22.1 FAVOR 2 127 11.1 36.9 59.0 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 67 5.8 19.5 78.5 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 33 2.9 9.6 88.1 OPPOSE 5 29 2.5 8.4 96.5 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 12 1.0 3.5 100.0 . 634 55.2 Missing NOT SURE 7 170 14.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 344 Missing cases 804 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INVAA6B Q19d, average American voter Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 16 1.4 3.3 3.3 FAVOR 2 98 8.5 20.5 23.8 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 211 18.4 44.1 67.8 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 106 9.2 22.1 90.0 OPPOSE 5 41 3.6 8.6 98.5 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 7 .6 1.5 100.0 . 628 54.7 Missing NOT SURE 7 41 3.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 479 Missing cases 669 INVDP6B Q19d, Democratic Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 11 1.0 2.4 2.4 FAVOR 2 32 2.8 6.9 9.3 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 60 5.2 12.9 22.2 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 119 10.4 25.6 47.8 OPPOSE 5 182 15.9 39.2 87.1 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 60 5.2 12.9 100.0 . 621 54.1 Missing NOT SURE 7 63 5.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 464 Missing cases 684 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INVRP6B Q19d, Republican Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 38 3.3 8.3 8.3 FAVOR 2 136 11.8 29.7 38.0 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 123 10.7 26.9 64.8 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 74 6.4 16.2 81.0 OPPOSE 5 71 6.2 15.5 96.5 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 16 1.4 3.5 100.0 . 626 54.5 Missing NOT SURE 7 64 5.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 458 Missing cases 690 INVRE6B Q19d, Reform Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY FAVOR 1 53 4.6 21.1 21.1 FAVOR 2 102 8.9 40.6 61.8 SLIGHTLY FAVOR 3 51 4.4 20.3 82.1 SLIGHTLY OPPOSE 4 27 2.4 10.8 92.8 OPPOSE 5 8 .7 3.2 96.0 STRONGLY OPPOSE 6 10 .9 4.0 100.0 . 637 55.5 Missing NOT SURE 7 260 22.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 251 Missing cases 897 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVABC6B Q20, Bill Clinton Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 59 5.1 11.2 11.2 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 181 15.8 34.2 45.4 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVERA 3 107 9.3 20.2 65.6 AVERAGE 4 44 3.8 8.3 73.9 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVERA 5 34 3.0 6.4 80.3 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 31 2.7 5.9 86.2 POOR 7 73 6.4 13.8 100.0 . 619 53.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 529 Missing cases 619 EVARD6B Q20, Robert Dole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 14 1.2 2.7 2.7 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 113 9.8 21.8 24.5 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVERA 3 135 11.8 26.0 50.5 AVERAGE 4 140 12.2 27.0 77.5 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVERA 5 50 4.4 9.6 87.1 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 40 3.5 7.7 94.8 POOR 7 27 2.4 5.2 100.0 . 626 54.5 Missing NOT SURE 8 3 .3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 519 Missing cases 629 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVARG6B Q20, Richard Gephardt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 16 1.4 3.4 3.4 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 109 9.5 23.1 26.5 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVERA 3 117 10.2 24.8 51.4 AVERAGE 4 107 9.3 22.7 74.1 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVERA 5 49 4.3 10.4 84.5 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 40 3.5 8.5 93.0 POOR 7 33 2.9 7.0 100.0 . 634 55.2 Missing NOT SURE 8 43 3.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 471 Missing cases 677 EVANG6B Q20, Newt Gingrich Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 19 1.7 3.8 3.8 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 59 5.1 11.7 15.4 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVERA 3 59 5.1 11.7 27.1 AVERAGE 4 66 5.7 13.0 40.1 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVERA 5 62 5.4 12.3 52.4 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 81 7.1 16.0 68.4 POOR 7 160 13.9 31.6 100.0 . 632 55.1 Missing NOT SURE 8 10 .9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 506 Missing cases 642 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVAAG6B Q20, Al Gore Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 59 5.1 11.5 11.5 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 179 15.6 34.9 46.4 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVERA 3 94 8.2 18.3 64.7 AVERAGE 4 67 5.8 13.1 77.8 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVERA 5 36 3.1 7.0 84.8 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 30 2.6 5.8 90.6 POOR 7 48 4.2 9.4 100.0 . 629 54.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 6 .5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 513 Missing cases 635 EVAJK6B Q20, Jack Kemp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 20 1.7 4.1 4.1 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 82 7.1 16.9 21.0 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVERA 3 129 11.2 26.6 47.6 AVERAGE 4 145 12.6 29.9 77.5 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVERA 5 50 4.4 10.3 87.8 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 32 2.8 6.6 94.4 POOR 7 27 2.4 5.6 100.0 . 642 55.9 Missing NOT SURE 8 21 1.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 485 Missing cases 663 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVADL6B Q20, Dick Lamm Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 1 .1 .4 .4 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 11 1.0 4.9 5.3 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVERA 3 46 4.0 20.4 25.7 AVERAGE 4 68 5.9 30.1 55.8 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVERA 5 39 3.4 17.3 73.0 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 32 2.8 14.2 87.2 POOR 7 29 2.5 12.8 100.0 . 660 57.5 Missing NOT SURE 8 262 22.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 226 Missing cases 922 EVAHRP6B Q20, H Ross Perot Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 4 .3 .9 .9 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 23 2.0 5.4 6.3 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVERA 3 47 4.1 11.0 17.3 AVERAGE 4 60 5.2 14.1 31.4 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVERA 5 73 6.4 17.1 48.5 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 73 6.4 17.1 65.6 POOR 7 147 12.8 34.4 100.0 . 651 56.7 Missing NOT SURE 8 70 6.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 427 Missing cases 721 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVACP6B Q20, Colin Powell Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 33 2.9 7.5 7.5 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 130 11.3 29.6 37.1 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVERA 3 130 11.3 29.6 66.7 AVERAGE 4 89 7.8 20.3 87.0 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVERA 5 27 2.4 6.2 93.2 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 14 1.2 3.2 96.4 POOR 7 16 1.4 3.6 100.0 . 648 56.4 Missing NOT SURE 8 61 5.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 439 Missing cases 709 EVADP6B Q20, Democratic Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 23 2.0 4.6 4.6 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 97 8.4 19.5 24.1 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVERA 3 122 10.6 24.5 48.6 AVERAGE 4 117 10.2 23.5 72.1 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVERA 5 50 4.4 10.0 82.1 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 38 3.3 7.6 89.8 POOR 7 51 4.4 10.2 100.0 . 638 55.6 Missing NOT SURE 8 12 1.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 498 Missing cases 650 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVARP6B Q20, Republican Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 9 .8 1.8 1.8 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 43 3.7 8.8 10.6 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVERA 3 79 6.9 16.1 26.7 AVERAGE 4 132 11.5 26.9 53.6 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVERA 5 78 6.8 15.9 69.5 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 79 6.9 16.1 85.5 POOR 7 71 6.2 14.5 100.0 . 640 55.7 Missing NOT SURE 8 17 1.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 491 Missing cases 657 EVARE6B Q20, Reform Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 3 .3 1.0 1.0 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVERA 3 14 1.2 4.8 5.8 AVERAGE 4 48 4.2 16.5 22.3 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVERA 5 65 5.7 22.3 44.7 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 71 6.2 24.4 69.1 POOR 7 90 7.8 30.9 100.0 . 676 58.9 Missing NOT SURE 8 181 15.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 291 Missing cases 857 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVADH6B Q20, Democratic House candidate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 27 2.4 5.9 5.9 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 104 9.1 22.9 28.8 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVERA 3 100 8.7 22.0 50.8 AVERAGE 4 92 8.0 20.2 71.0 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVERA 5 40 3.5 8.8 79.8 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 32 2.8 7.0 86.8 POOR 7 60 5.2 13.2 100.0 . 654 57.0 Missing NOT SURE 8 39 3.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 455 Missing cases 693 EVARH6B Q20, Republican House candidate Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 33 2.9 7.4 7.4 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 73 6.4 16.4 23.8 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVERA 3 74 6.4 16.6 40.4 AVERAGE 4 94 8.2 21.1 61.4 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVERA 5 51 4.4 11.4 72.9 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 47 4.1 10.5 83.4 POOR 7 74 6.4 16.6 100.0 . 650 56.6 Missing NOT SURE 8 52 4.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 446 Missing cases 702 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVACON6B Q20, Congress Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 7 .6 1.4 1.4 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 27 2.4 5.5 7.0 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVERA 3 77 6.7 15.7 22.7 AVERAGE 4 186 16.2 38.0 60.7 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVERA 5 94 8.2 19.2 80.0 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 64 5.6 13.1 93.0 POOR 7 34 3.0 7.0 100.0 . 648 56.4 Missing NOT SURE 8 11 1.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 489 Missing cases 659 EVASC6B Q20, Supreme Court Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 4 .3 .8 .8 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 71 6.2 14.7 15.5 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVERA 3 109 9.5 22.5 38.0 AVERAGE 4 154 13.4 31.8 69.8 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVERA 5 72 6.3 14.9 84.7 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 41 3.6 8.5 93.2 POOR 7 33 2.9 6.8 100.0 . 644 56.1 Missing NOT SURE 8 20 1.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 484 Missing cases 664 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVAMIL6B Q20, US Military Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 32 2.8 6.7 6.7 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 96 8.4 20.0 26.6 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVERA 3 119 10.4 24.7 51.4 AVERAGE 4 136 11.8 28.3 79.6 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVERA 5 53 4.6 11.0 90.6 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 24 2.1 5.0 95.6 POOR 7 21 1.8 4.4 100.0 . 641 55.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 26 2.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 481 Missing cases 667 EVAUN6B Q20, United Nations Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 6 .5 1.3 1.3 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 49 4.3 10.2 11.5 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVERA 3 92 8.0 19.2 30.6 AVERAGE 4 135 11.8 28.1 58.8 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVERA 5 73 6.4 15.2 74.0 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 50 4.4 10.4 84.4 POOR 7 75 6.5 15.6 100.0 . 640 55.7 Missing NOT SURE 8 28 2.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 480 Missing cases 668 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EVALAB6B Q20, labor unions Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 15 1.3 3.1 3.1 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 42 3.7 8.8 11.9 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVERA 3 77 6.7 16.1 28.0 AVERAGE 4 132 11.5 27.6 55.6 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVERA 5 57 5.0 11.9 67.6 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 70 6.1 14.6 82.2 POOR 7 85 7.4 17.8 100.0 . 642 55.9 Missing NOT SURE 8 28 2.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 478 Missing cases 670 EVABUS6B Q20, business corporations Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent OUTSTANDING 1 3 .3 .6 .6 WELL ABOVE AVERAGE 2 21 1.8 4.4 5.1 SLIGHTLY ABOVE AVERA 3 60 5.2 12.6 17.7 AVERAGE 4 155 13.5 32.6 50.3 SLIGHTLY BELOW AVERA 5 109 9.5 22.9 73.3 WELL BELOW AVERAGE 6 68 5.9 14.3 87.6 POOR 7 59 5.1 12.4 100.0 . 641 55.8 Missing NOT SURE 8 32 2.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 475 Missing cases 673 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GOVRUN6B Q21, government is run: Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent BY A FEW BIG INTERES 1 337 29.4 63.9 63.9 FOR ALL THE PEOPLE 2 190 16.6 36.1 100.0 . 621 54.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 527 Missing cases 621 NECON6B Q22, the nation as a whole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUCH BETTER 1 52 4.5 9.4 9.4 SOMEWHAT BETTER 2 253 22.0 45.7 55.1 ABOUT THE SAME 3 198 17.2 35.7 90.8 SOMEWHAT WORSE 4 41 3.6 7.4 98.2 MUCH WORSE 5 10 .9 1.8 100.0 . 594 51.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 554 Missing cases 594 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PECON6B Q22, you and your family Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUCH BETTER 1 35 3.0 6.4 6.4 SOMEWHAT BETTER 2 166 14.5 30.2 36.6 ABOUT THE SAME 3 273 23.8 49.7 86.3 SOMEWHAT WORSE 4 68 5.9 12.4 98.7 MUCH WORSE 5 7 .6 1.3 100.0 . 599 52.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 549 Missing cases 599 FNECON6B Q23, the nation as a whole Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUCH BETTER 1 22 1.9 3.9 3.9 SOMEWHAT BETTER 2 148 12.9 26.6 30.5 ABOUT THE SAME 3 276 24.0 49.6 80.1 SOMEWHAT WORSE 4 97 8.4 17.4 97.5 MUCH WORSE 5 14 1.2 2.5 100.0 . 591 51.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 557 Missing cases 591 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FPECON6B Q23, you and your family Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MUCH BETTER 1 24 2.1 4.4 4.4 SOMEWHAT BETTER 2 134 11.7 24.4 28.7 ABOUT THE SAME 3 343 29.9 62.4 91.1 SOMEWHAT WORSE 4 41 3.6 7.5 98.5 MUCH WORSE 5 8 .7 1.5 100.0 . 598 52.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 550 Missing cases 598 FNECPR6B Q24, How certain are you for Q23? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY CERTAIN 1 43 3.7 7.8 7.8 CERTAIN 2 275 24.0 49.9 57.7 SOMEWHAT UNCERTAIN 3 214 18.6 38.8 96.6 VERY UNCERTAIN 4 19 1.7 3.4 100.0 . 597 52.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 551 Missing cases 597 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BETINF6B Q25, I'm more informed than most Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 10 .9 1.9 1.9 DISAGREE 2 49 4.3 9.4 11.3 AGREE 3 260 22.6 49.8 61.1 STRONGLY AGREE 4 203 17.7 38.9 100.0 . 600 52.3 Missing NOT SURE 5 26 2.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 522 Missing cases 626 DEMPRO6B Q25, demonstrators allowed to protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 45 3.9 8.6 8.6 DISAGREE 2 94 8.2 18.0 26.6 AGREE 3 255 22.2 48.9 75.5 STRONGLY AGREE 4 128 11.1 24.5 100.0 . 601 52.4 Missing NOT SURE 5 25 2.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 522 Missing cases 626 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - POLVIO6B Q25, the police stop violent protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 10 .9 1.9 1.9 DISAGREE 2 53 4.6 10.1 12.0 AGREE 3 313 27.3 59.4 71.3 STRONGLY AGREE 4 151 13.2 28.7 100.0 . 600 52.3 Missing NOT SURE 5 21 1.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 527 Missing cases 621 WELREP6B Q25, people like me are well represented Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 61 5.3 12.3 12.3 DISAGREE 2 218 19.0 43.9 56.1 AGREE 3 197 17.2 39.6 95.8 STRONGLY AGREE 4 21 1.8 4.2 100.0 . 613 53.4 Missing NOT SURE 5 38 3.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 497 Missing cases 651 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FRSPCH6B Q25, free speech granted to everyone Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 24 2.1 4.6 4.6 DISAGREE 2 101 8.8 19.3 23.9 AGREE 3 269 23.4 51.3 75.2 STRONGLY AGREE 4 130 11.3 24.8 100.0 . 602 52.4 Missing NOT SURE 5 22 1.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 524 Missing cases 624 POLNV6B Q25, the police stop disruptive protest Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 63 5.5 12.5 12.5 DISAGREE 2 184 16.0 36.4 48.9 AGREE 3 206 17.9 40.8 89.7 STRONGLY AGREE 4 52 4.5 10.3 100.0 . 604 52.6 Missing NOT SURE 5 39 3.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 505 Missing cases 643 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SPGOV6B Q25, speech against government Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent STRONGLY DISAGREE 1 87 7.6 18.0 18.0 DISAGREE 2 134 11.7 27.7 45.8 AGREE 3 174 15.2 36.0 81.8 STRONGLY AGREE 4 88 7.7 18.2 100.0 . 608 53.0 Missing NOT SURE 5 57 5.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 483 Missing cases 665 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - REFPID6B Q26, Identify with Reform Party? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 23 2.0 4.2 4.2 NO 2 522 45.5 95.8 100.0 . 603 52.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 545 Missing cases 603 STRREF6B Q26a, How strongly? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY STRONGLY 1 2 .2 3.0 3.0 STRONGLY 2 8 .7 12.1 15.2 NOT SO STRONGLY 3 56 4.9 84.8 100.0 . 1082 94.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 66 Missing cases 1082 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RPFMLP6B Q27, memb local cmte, Rep former Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 500 43.6 87.6 87.6 CHECKED 1 71 6.2 12.4 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RPCMLP6B Q27, memb local cmte, Rep current Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 522 45.5 91.4 91.4 CHECKED 1 49 4.3 8.6 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 DPFMLP6B Q27, memb local cmte, Dem former Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 449 39.1 78.6 78.6 CHECKED 1 122 10.6 21.4 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DPCMLP6B Q27, memb local cmte, Dem current Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 480 41.8 84.1 84.1 CHECKED 1 91 7.9 15.9 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RECMLP6B Q27, memb local cmte, Reform current Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 570 49.7 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 1 .1 .2 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 RPFCLP6B Q27, chair local cmte, Rep former Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 547 47.6 95.8 95.8 CHECKED 1 24 2.1 4.2 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RPCCLP6B Q27, chair local cmte, Rep current Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 561 48.9 98.2 98.2 CHECKED 1 10 .9 1.8 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DPFCLP6B Q27, chair local cmte, Dem former Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 526 45.8 92.1 92.1 CHECKED 1 45 3.9 7.9 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 DPCCLP6B Q27, chair local cmte, Dem current Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 558 48.6 97.7 97.7 CHECKED 1 13 1.1 2.3 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RECCLP6B Q27, chair local cmte, Ref current Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 571 49.7 100.0 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RPFOLP6B Q27, othr local office, Rep former Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 549 47.8 96.1 96.1 CHECKED 1 22 1.9 3.9 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 RPCOLP6B Q27, othr local office, Rep current Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 560 48.8 98.1 98.1 CHECKED 1 11 1.0 1.9 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DEFOLP6B Q27, othr local office, Dem former Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 518 45.1 90.7 90.7 CHECKED 1 53 4.6 9.3 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DECOLP6B Q27, othr local office, Dem current Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 552 48.1 96.7 96.7 CHECKED 1 19 1.7 3.3 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 RECOLP6B Q27, othr local office, Ref current Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 570 49.7 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 1 .1 .2 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RPFMCD6B Q27, memb district cmte, Rep former Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 561 48.9 98.2 98.2 CHECKED 1 10 .9 1.8 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RPCMCD6B Q27, memb district cmte, Rep current Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 563 49.0 98.6 98.6 CHECKED 1 8 .7 1.4 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 DPFMCD6B Q27, memb district cmte, Dem former Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 536 46.7 93.9 93.9 CHECKED 1 35 3.0 6.1 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DPCMCD6B Q27, memb district cmte, Dem current Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 557 48.5 97.5 97.5 CHECKED 1 14 1.2 2.5 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RECMCD6B Q27, memb district cmte, Ref current Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 570 49.7 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 1 .1 .2 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 RPFMSC6B Q27, memb ste cent cmte, Rep former Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 567 49.4 99.3 99.3 CHECKED 1 4 .3 .7 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RPCMSC6B Q27, memb ste cent cmte, Rep current Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 570 49.7 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 1 .1 .2 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DPFMSC6B Q27, memb ste cent cmte, Dem former Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 570 49.7 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 1 .1 .2 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 DPCMSC6B Q27, memb ste cent cmte, Dem current Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 563 49.0 98.6 98.6 CHECKED 1 8 .7 1.4 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RECMSC6B Q27, memb ste cent cmte, Ref current Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 571 49.7 100.0 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RPFOTH6B Q27, othr office, Rep former Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 565 49.2 98.9 98.9 CHECKED 1 6 .5 1.1 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 RPCOTH6B Q27, othr office, Rep current Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 570 49.7 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 1 .1 .2 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DPFOTH6B Q27, othr office, Dem former Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 554 48.3 97.0 97.0 CHECKED 1 17 1.5 3.0 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DPCOTH6B Q27, othr office, Dem current Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 570 49.7 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 1 .1 .2 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 RECOTH6B Q27, othr office, Ref current Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 571 49.7 100.0 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NMTEA6B Q28, not member, teacher org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 253 22.0 44.3 44.3 CHECKED 1 318 27.7 55.7 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMTEA6B Q28, inactive member, teacher org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 560 48.8 98.1 98.1 CHECKED 1 11 1.0 1.9 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 COTEA6B Q28, convince, teacher org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 560 48.8 98.1 98.1 CHECKED 1 11 1.0 1.9 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PDTEA6B Q28, paid dues, teacher org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 535 46.6 93.7 93.7 CHECKED 1 36 3.1 6.3 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AMTEA6B Q28, attended mtg, teacher org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 556 48.4 97.4 97.4 CHECKED 1 15 1.3 2.6 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 LRTEA6B Q28, leader role, teacher org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 559 48.7 97.9 97.9 CHECKED 1 12 1.0 2.1 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GMTEA6B Q28, gave money, teacher org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 564 49.1 98.8 98.8 CHECKED 1 7 .6 1.2 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OATEA6B Q28, other activities, teacher org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 563 49.0 98.6 98.6 CHECKED 1 8 .7 1.4 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 NMBUS6B Q28, not member, business org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 254 22.1 44.5 44.5 CHECKED 1 317 27.6 55.5 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMBUS6B Q28, inactive member, business org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 558 48.6 97.7 97.7 CHECKED 1 13 1.1 2.3 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - COBUS6B Q28, convince, business org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 566 49.3 99.1 99.1 CHECKED 1 5 .4 .9 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 PDBUS6B Q28, paid dues, business org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 551 48.0 96.5 96.5 CHECKED 1 20 1.7 3.5 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AMBUS6B Q28, attended mtg, business org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 553 48.2 96.8 96.8 CHECKED 1 18 1.6 3.2 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LRBUS6B Q28, leader role, business orga Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 558 48.6 97.7 97.7 CHECKED 1 13 1.1 2.3 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 GMBUS6B Q28, gave money, business org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 566 49.3 99.1 99.1 CHECKED 1 5 .4 .9 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OABUS6B Q28, other activities, business org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 562 49.0 98.4 98.4 CHECKED 1 9 .8 1.6 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NMVET6B Q28, not member, vets group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 265 23.1 46.4 46.4 CHECKED 1 306 26.7 53.6 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 IMVET6B Q28, inactive member, vets group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 552 48.1 96.7 96.7 CHECKED 1 19 1.7 3.3 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - COVET6B Q28, convince, vets group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 562 49.0 98.4 98.4 CHECKED 1 9 .8 1.6 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PDVET6B Q28, paid dues, vets group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 534 46.5 93.5 93.5 CHECKED 1 37 3.2 6.5 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 AMVET6B Q28, attended mtg, vets group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 557 48.5 97.5 97.5 CHECKED 1 14 1.2 2.5 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LRVET6B Q28, leader role, vets group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 558 48.6 97.7 97.7 CHECKED 1 13 1.1 2.3 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GMVET6B Q28, gave money, vets group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 554 48.3 97.0 97.0 CHECKED 1 17 1.5 3.0 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 OAVET6B Q28, other activities, vets group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 560 48.8 98.1 98.1 CHECKED 1 11 1.0 1.9 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NMWRG6B Q28, not member, womens group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 264 23.0 46.2 46.2 CHECKED 1 307 26.7 53.8 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMWRG6B Q28, inactive member, womens group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 548 47.7 96.0 96.0 CHECKED 1 23 2.0 4.0 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 COWRG6B Q28, convince, womens group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 566 49.3 99.1 99.1 CHECKED 1 5 .4 .9 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PDWRG6B Q28, paid dues, womens group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 544 47.4 95.3 95.3 CHECKED 1 27 2.4 4.7 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AMWRG6B Q28, attended mtg, womens group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 563 49.0 98.6 98.6 CHECKED 1 8 .7 1.4 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 LRWRG6B Q28, leader role, womens group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 570 49.7 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 1 .1 .2 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GMWRG6B Q28, gave money, womens group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 555 48.3 97.2 97.2 CHECKED 1 16 1.4 2.8 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OAWRG6B Q28, other activities, womens group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 567 49.4 99.3 99.3 CHECKED 1 4 .3 .7 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 NMCIVL6B Q28, not member, civil rts group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 259 22.6 45.4 45.4 CHECKED 1 312 27.2 54.6 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMCIVL6B Q28, inactive member, civil rts group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 556 48.4 97.4 97.4 CHECKED 1 15 1.3 2.6 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - COCIVL6B Q28, convince, civil rts group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 566 49.3 99.1 99.1 CHECKED 1 5 .4 .9 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 PDCIVL6B Q28, paid dues, civil rts group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 544 47.4 95.3 95.3 CHECKED 1 27 2.4 4.7 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AMCIVL6B Q28, attended mtg, civil rts group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 565 49.2 98.9 98.9 CHECKED 1 6 .5 1.1 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LACIVL6B Q28, leader role, civil rts group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 568 49.5 99.5 99.5 CHECKED 1 3 .3 .5 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 GMCIVL6B Q28, gave money, civil rts group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 558 48.6 97.7 97.7 CHECKED 1 13 1.1 2.3 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OACIVL6B Q28, other activities, civil rts group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 565 49.2 98.9 98.9 CHECKED 1 6 .5 1.1 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NMENV6B Q28, not member, enviro group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 294 25.6 51.5 51.5 CHECKED 1 277 24.1 48.5 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 IMENV6B Q28, inactive member, enviro group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 541 47.1 94.7 94.7 CHECKED 1 30 2.6 5.3 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - COENV6B Q28, convince, enviro group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 567 49.4 99.3 99.3 CHECKED 1 4 .3 .7 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PDENV6B Q28, paid dues, enviro group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 519 45.2 90.9 90.9 CHECKED 1 52 4.5 9.1 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 AMENV6B Q28, attended mtg, enviro group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 557 48.5 97.5 97.5 CHECKED 1 14 1.2 2.5 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LRENV6B Q28, leader role, enviro group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 563 49.0 98.6 98.6 CHECKED 1 8 .7 1.4 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GMENV6B Q28, gave money, enviro group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 536 46.7 93.9 93.9 CHECKED 1 35 3.0 6.1 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 OAENV6B Q28, other activities, enviro group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 559 48.7 97.9 97.9 CHECKED 1 12 1.0 2.1 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NMNPIG6B Q28, not member, non-part int grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 287 25.0 50.3 50.3 CHECKED 1 284 24.7 49.7 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMNPIG6B Q28, inactive member, non-part int grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 552 48.1 96.7 96.7 CHECKED 1 19 1.7 3.3 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 CONPIG6B Q28, convince, non-part int grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 559 48.7 97.9 97.9 CHECKED 1 12 1.0 2.1 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PDNPIG6B Q28, paid dues, non-part int grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 522 45.5 91.4 91.4 CHECKED 1 49 4.3 8.6 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AMNPIG6B Q28, attended mtg, non-part int grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 548 47.7 96.0 96.0 CHECKED 1 23 2.0 4.0 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 LRNPIG6B Q28, leader role, non-part int grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 556 48.4 97.4 97.4 CHECKED 1 15 1.3 2.6 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GMNPIG6B Q28, gave money, non-part int grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 542 47.2 94.9 94.9 CHECKED 1 29 2.5 5.1 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OANPIG6B Q28, other activities, non-part int grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 560 48.8 98.1 98.1 CHECKED 1 11 1.0 1.9 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 NMFARM6B Q28, not member, farm org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 282 24.6 49.4 49.4 CHECKED 1 289 25.2 50.6 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMFARM6B Q28, inactive member, farm org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 548 47.7 96.0 96.0 CHECKED 1 23 2.0 4.0 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - COFARM6B Q28, convince, farm org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 564 49.1 98.8 98.8 CHECKED 1 7 .6 1.2 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 PDFARM6B Q28, paid dues, farm org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 529 46.1 92.6 92.6 CHECKED 1 42 3.7 7.4 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AMFARM6B Q28, attended mtg, farm org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 547 47.6 95.8 95.8 CHECKED 1 24 2.1 4.2 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LRFARM6B Q28, leader role, farm org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 557 48.5 97.5 97.5 CHECKED 1 14 1.2 2.5 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 GMFARM6B Q28, gave money, farm org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 564 49.1 98.8 98.8 CHECKED 1 7 .6 1.2 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OAFARM6B Q28, other activities, farm org Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 565 49.2 98.9 98.9 CHECKED 1 6 .5 1.1 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NMEVAN6B Q28, not member, political evang grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 248 21.6 43.4 43.4 CHECKED 1 323 28.1 56.6 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 IMEVAN6B Q28, inactive member, political evang gr Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 565 49.2 98.9 98.9 CHECKED 1 6 .5 1.1 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - COEVAN6B Q28, convince, political evang grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 569 49.6 99.6 99.6 CHECKED 1 2 .2 .4 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PDEVAN6B Q28, paid dues, political evang grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 555 48.3 97.2 97.2 CHECKED 1 16 1.4 2.8 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 AMEVAN6B Q28, attended mtg, political evang grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 559 48.7 97.9 97.9 CHECKED 1 12 1.0 2.1 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LREVAN6B Q28, leader role, political evang grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 566 49.3 99.1 99.1 CHECKED 1 5 .4 .9 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GMEVAN6B Q28, gave money, political evang grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 562 49.0 98.4 98.4 CHECKED 1 9 .8 1.6 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 OAEVAN6B Q28, other activities, political evang g Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 565 49.2 98.9 98.9 CHECKED 1 6 .5 1.1 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NMABOR6B Q28, not member, anti/pro-abortion grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 272 23.7 47.6 47.6 CHECKED 1 299 26.0 52.4 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMABOR6B Q28, inactive member, anti/pro-abortion Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 562 49.0 98.4 98.4 CHECKED 1 9 .8 1.6 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 COABOR6B Q28, convince, anti/pro-abortion grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 560 48.8 98.1 98.1 CHECKED 1 11 1.0 1.9 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PDABOR6B Q28, paid dues, anti/pro-abortion grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 550 47.9 96.3 96.3 CHECKED 1 21 1.8 3.7 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AMABOR6B Q28, attended mtg, anti/pro-abortion grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 557 48.5 97.5 97.5 CHECKED 1 14 1.2 2.5 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 LRABOR6B Q28, leader role, anti/pro-abortion grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 568 49.5 99.5 99.5 CHECKED 1 3 .3 .5 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GMABOR6B Q28, gave money, anti/pro-abortion grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 546 47.6 95.6 95.6 CHECKED 1 25 2.2 4.4 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OAABOR6B Q28, other activities, anti/pro-abortion Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 560 48.8 98.1 98.1 CHECKED 1 11 1.0 1.9 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 NMLIBG6B Q28, not member, liberal ideol grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 280 24.4 49.0 49.0 CHECKED 1 291 25.3 51.0 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMLIBG6B Q28, inactive member, liberal ideol grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 552 48.1 96.7 96.7 CHECKED 1 19 1.7 3.3 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - COLIBG6B Q28, convince, liberal ideol grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 565 49.2 98.9 98.9 CHECKED 1 6 .5 1.1 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 PDLIBG6B Q28, paid dues, liberal ideol grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 545 47.5 95.4 95.4 CHECKED 1 26 2.3 4.6 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AMLIBG6B Q28, attended mtg, liberal ideol grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 564 49.1 98.8 98.8 CHECKED 1 7 .6 1.2 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LRLIBG6B Q28, leader role, liberal ideol grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 566 49.3 99.1 99.1 CHECKED 1 5 .4 .9 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 GMLIBG6B Q28, gave money, liberal ideol grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 554 48.3 97.0 97.0 CHECKED 1 17 1.5 3.0 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OALIBG6B Q28, other activities, liberal ideol grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 558 48.6 97.7 97.7 CHECKED 1 13 1.1 2.3 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NMCONG6B Q28, not member, conserv ideol grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 250 21.8 43.8 43.8 CHECKED 1 321 28.0 56.2 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 IMCONG6B Q28, inactive member, conserv ideol grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 564 49.1 98.8 98.8 CHECKED 1 7 .6 1.2 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - COCONG6B Q28, convince, conserv ideol grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 564 49.1 98.8 98.8 CHECKED 1 7 .6 1.2 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PDCONG6B Q28, paid dues, conserv ideol grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 564 49.1 98.8 98.8 CHECKED 1 7 .6 1.2 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 AMCONG6B Q28, attended mtg, conserv ideol grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 564 49.1 98.8 98.8 CHECKED 1 7 .6 1.2 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LRCONG6B Q28, leader role, conserv ideol grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 567 49.4 99.3 99.3 CHECKED 1 4 .3 .7 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GMCONG6B Q28, gave money, conserv ideol grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 562 49.0 98.4 98.4 CHECKED 1 9 .8 1.6 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 OACONG6B Q28, other activities, conserv ideol grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 564 49.1 98.8 98.8 CHECKED 1 7 .6 1.2 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NMCRIM6B Q28, not member, crime watch grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 291 25.3 51.0 51.0 CHECKED 1 280 24.4 49.0 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMCRIM6B Q28, inactive member, crime watch grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 546 47.6 95.6 95.6 CHECKED 1 25 2.2 4.4 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 COCRIM6B Q28, convince, crime watch grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 559 48.7 97.9 97.9 CHECKED 1 12 1.0 2.1 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PDCRIM6B Q28, paid dues, crime watch grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 562 49.0 98.4 98.4 CHECKED 1 9 .8 1.6 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AMCRIM6B Q28, attended mtg, crime watch grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 553 48.2 96.8 96.8 CHECKED 1 18 1.6 3.2 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 LRCRIM6B Q28, leader role, crime watch grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 562 49.0 98.4 98.4 CHECKED 1 9 .8 1.6 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GMCRIM6B Q28, gave money, crime watch grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 568 49.5 99.5 99.5 CHECKED 1 3 .3 .5 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OACRIM6B Q28, other activities, crime watch grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 560 48.8 98.1 98.1 CHECKED 1 11 1.0 1.9 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 NMEDUC6B Q28, not member, educational grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 322 28.0 56.4 56.4 CHECKED 1 249 21.7 43.6 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMEDUC6B Q28, inactive member, educational grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 545 47.5 95.4 95.4 CHECKED 1 26 2.3 4.6 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - COEDUC6B Q28, convince, educational grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 561 48.9 98.2 98.2 CHECKED 1 10 .9 1.8 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 PDEDUC6B Q28, paid dues, educational grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 520 45.3 91.1 91.1 CHECKED 1 51 4.4 8.9 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AMEDUC6B Q28, attended mtg, educational grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 522 45.5 91.4 91.4 CHECKED 1 49 4.3 8.6 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LREDUC6B Q28, leader role, educational grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 549 47.8 96.1 96.1 CHECKED 1 22 1.9 3.9 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 GMEDUC6B Q28, gave money, educational grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 553 48.2 96.8 96.8 CHECKED 1 18 1.6 3.2 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OAEDUC6B Q28, other activities, educational grp Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 546 47.6 95.6 95.6 CHECKED 1 25 2.2 4.4 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NMCHUR6B Q28, not member, church group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 441 38.4 77.2 77.2 CHECKED 1 130 11.3 22.8 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 IMCHUR6B Q28, inactive member, church group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 527 45.9 92.3 92.3 CHECKED 1 44 3.8 7.7 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - COCHUR6B Q28, convince, church group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 522 45.5 91.4 91.4 CHECKED 1 49 4.3 8.6 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PDCHUR6B Q28, paid dues, church group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 488 42.5 85.5 85.5 CHECKED 1 83 7.2 14.5 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 AMCHUR6B Q28, attended mtg, church group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 439 38.2 76.9 76.9 CHECKED 1 132 11.5 23.1 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LRCHUR6B Q28, leader role, church group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 453 39.5 79.3 79.3 CHECKED 1 118 10.3 20.7 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GMCHUR6B Q28, gave money, church group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 435 37.9 76.2 76.2 CHECKED 1 136 11.8 23.8 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 OACHUR6B Q28, other activities, church group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 474 41.3 83.0 83.0 CHECKED 1 97 8.4 17.0 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NMUWSA6B Q28, not member, UWSA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 244 21.3 42.7 42.7 CHECKED 1 327 28.5 57.3 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMUWSA6B Q28, inactive member, UWSA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 565 49.2 98.9 98.9 CHECKED 1 6 .5 1.1 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 COUWSA6B Q28, convince, UWSA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 569 49.6 99.6 99.6 CHECKED 1 2 .2 .4 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PDUWSA6B Q28, paid dues, UWSA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 569 49.6 99.6 99.6 CHECKED 1 2 .2 .4 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AMUWSA6B Q28, attended mtg, UWSA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 568 49.5 99.5 99.5 CHECKED 1 3 .3 .5 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 LRUWSA6B Q28, leader role, UWSA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 570 49.7 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 1 .1 .2 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GMUWSA6B Q28, gave money, UWSA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 570 49.7 99.8 99.8 CHECKED 1 1 .1 .2 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OAUWSA6B Q28, other activities, UWSA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 569 49.6 99.6 99.6 CHECKED 1 2 .2 .4 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 NMCIVC6B Q28, not member, civic group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 299 26.0 52.4 52.4 CHECKED 1 272 23.7 47.6 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - IMCIVC6B Q28, inactive member, civic group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 560 48.8 98.1 98.1 CHECKED 1 11 1.0 1.9 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - COCIVC6B Q28, convince, civic group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 549 47.8 96.1 96.1 CHECKED 1 22 1.9 3.9 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 PDCIVC6B Q28, paid dues, civic group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 523 45.6 91.6 91.6 CHECKED 1 48 4.2 8.4 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AMCIVC6B Q28, attended mtg, civic group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 527 45.9 92.3 92.3 CHECKED 1 44 3.8 7.7 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LRCIVC6B Q28, leader role, civic group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 531 46.3 93.0 93.0 CHECKED 1 40 3.5 7.0 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 GMCIVC6B Q28, gave money, civic group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 537 46.8 94.0 94.0 CHECKED 1 34 3.0 6.0 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OACIVC6B Q28, other activities, civic group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NOT CHECKED 0 541 47.1 94.7 94.7 CHECKED 1 30 2.6 5.3 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TRUGOV6B Q29, the US Government Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent JUST ABOUT ALWAYS 1 16 1.4 2.9 2.9 MOST OF THE TIME 2 229 19.9 41.4 44.3 ONLY SOME OF THE TIM 3 272 23.7 49.2 93.5 ALMOST NEVER 4 30 2.6 5.4 98.9 NEVER 5 6 .5 1.1 100.0 . 595 51.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 553 Missing cases 595 TRSGOV6B Q29, your state government Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent JUST ABOUT ALWAYS 1 21 1.8 3.8 3.8 MOST OF THE TIME 2 270 23.5 48.7 52.5 ONLY SOME OF THE TIM 3 235 20.5 42.4 94.9 ALMOST NEVER 4 23 2.0 4.2 99.1 NEVER 5 5 .4 .9 100.0 . 594 51.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 554 Missing cases 594 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TRLGOV6B Q29, your local governemnt Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent JUST ABOUT ALWAYS 1 64 5.6 11.5 11.5 MOST OF THE TIME 2 290 25.3 52.3 63.8 ONLY SOME OF THE TIM 3 167 14.5 30.1 93.9 ALMOST NEVER 4 24 2.1 4.3 98.2 NEVER 5 10 .9 1.8 100.0 . 593 51.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 555 Missing cases 593 FFLDPO6B Q30, local Democratic Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 102 8.9 21.3 21.3 ONE OR TWO 2 130 11.3 27.1 48.4 THREE OR MORE 3 247 21.5 51.6 100.0 . 629 54.8 Missing NOT SURE 4 40 3.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 479 Missing cases 669 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FFLRPO6B Q30, local Republican Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 169 14.7 38.0 38.0 ONE OR TWO 2 91 7.9 20.4 58.4 THREE OR MORE 3 185 16.1 41.6 100.0 . 655 57.1 Missing NOT SURE 4 48 4.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 445 Missing cases 703 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FFUWSA6B Q30, United We Stand America Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 292 25.4 92.4 92.4 ONE OR TWO 2 15 1.3 4.7 97.2 THREE OR MORE 3 9 .8 2.8 100.0 . 706 61.5 Missing NOT SURE 4 126 11.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 316 Missing cases 832 FFREFP6B Q30, Reform Party Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 286 24.9 88.5 88.5 ONE OR TWO 2 28 2.4 8.7 97.2 THREE OR MORE 3 9 .8 2.8 100.0 . 707 61.6 Missing NOT SURE 4 118 10.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 323 Missing cases 825 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FFTEA6B Q30, teacher's organization Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 143 12.5 32.6 32.6 ONE OR TWO 2 124 10.8 28.2 60.8 THREE OR MORE 3 172 15.0 39.2 100.0 . 673 58.6 Missing NOT SURE 4 36 3.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 439 Missing cases 709 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FFBUS6B Q30, business organization Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 213 18.6 59.8 59.8 ONE OR TWO 2 62 5.4 17.4 77.2 THREE OR MORE 3 81 7.1 22.8 100.0 . 695 60.5 Missing NOT SURE 4 97 8.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 356 Missing cases 792 FFVET6B Q30, veteran's group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 176 15.3 43.5 43.5 ONE OR TWO 2 110 9.6 27.2 70.6 THREE OR MORE 3 119 10.4 29.4 100.0 . 683 59.5 Missing NOT SURE 4 60 5.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 405 Missing cases 743 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FFWRG6B Q30, women's rights group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 210 18.3 56.5 56.5 ONE OR TWO 2 85 7.4 22.8 79.3 THREE OR MORE 3 77 6.7 20.7 100.0 . 692 60.3 Missing NOT SURE 4 84 7.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 372 Missing cases 776 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FFCIVL6B Q30, civil rights group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 232 20.2 62.2 62.2 ONE OR TWO 2 79 6.9 21.2 83.4 THREE OR MORE 3 62 5.4 16.6 100.0 . 696 60.6 Missing NOT SURE 4 79 6.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 373 Missing cases 775 FFENV6B Q30, environmental group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 173 15.1 45.1 45.1 ONE OR TWO 2 115 10.0 29.9 75.0 THREE OR MORE 3 96 8.4 25.0 100.0 . 688 59.9 Missing NOT SURE 4 76 6.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 384 Missing cases 764 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FFNPIG6B Q30, non-partisan interest group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 187 16.3 49.5 49.5 ONE OR TWO 2 92 8.0 24.3 73.8 THREE OR MORE 3 99 8.6 26.2 100.0 . 691 60.2 Missing NOT SURE 4 79 6.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 378 Missing cases 770 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FFFARM6B Q30, farm organization Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 185 16.1 45.9 45.9 ONE OR TWO 2 86 7.5 21.3 67.2 THREE OR MORE 3 132 11.5 32.8 100.0 . 696 60.6 Missing NOT SURE 4 49 4.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 403 Missing cases 745 FFEVAN6B Q30, political concerned evang group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 265 23.1 70.1 70.1 ONE OR TWO 2 50 4.4 13.2 83.3 THREE OR MORE 3 63 5.5 16.7 100.0 . 699 60.9 Missing NOT SURE 4 71 6.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 378 Missing cases 770 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FFABOR6B Q30, anti-abortion or pro-life group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 207 18.0 54.3 54.3 ONE OR TWO 2 78 6.8 20.5 74.8 THREE OR MORE 3 96 8.4 25.2 100.0 . 691 60.2 Missing NOT SURE 4 76 6.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 381 Missing cases 767 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FFLIBG6B Q30, liberal ideological group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 209 18.2 59.0 59.0 ONE OR TWO 2 66 5.7 18.6 77.7 THREE OR MORE 3 79 6.9 22.3 100.0 . 696 60.6 Missing NOT SURE 4 98 8.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 354 Missing cases 794 FFCONG6B Q30, conservative ideological group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 235 20.5 67.7 67.7 ONE OR TWO 2 54 4.7 15.6 83.3 THREE OR MORE 3 58 5.1 16.7 100.0 . 705 61.4 Missing NOT SURE 4 96 8.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 347 Missing cases 801 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FFCRIM6B Q30, crime or neighborhood watch group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 191 16.6 51.1 51.1 ONE OR TWO 2 84 7.3 22.5 73.5 THREE OR MORE 3 99 8.6 26.5 100.0 . 694 60.5 Missing NOT SURE 4 80 7.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 374 Missing cases 774 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FFEDUC6B Q30, educational group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 103 9.0 24.3 24.3 ONE OR TWO 2 92 8.0 21.7 46.1 THREE OR MORE 3 228 19.9 53.9 100.0 . 680 59.2 Missing NOT SURE 4 45 3.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 423 Missing cases 725 FFCHUR6B Q30, church group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 43 3.7 8.9 8.9 ONE OR TWO 2 89 7.8 18.5 27.4 THREE OR MORE 3 350 30.5 72.6 100.0 . 643 56.0 Missing NOT SURE 4 23 2.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 482 Missing cases 666 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FFCIVC6B Q30, civic group Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent NONE 1 127 11.1 29.3 29.3 ONE OR TWO 2 90 7.8 20.8 50.1 THREE OR MORE 3 216 18.8 49.9 100.0 . 672 58.5 Missing NOT SURE 4 43 3.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 433 Missing cases 715 PIDSPO6B Q31, PID your spouse Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACTIVE DEMOCRAT 1 164 14.3 35.3 35.3 INACTIVE DEMOCRAT 2 107 9.3 23.0 58.3 ACTIVE REPUBLICAN 3 81 7.1 17.4 75.7 INACTIVE REPUBLICAN 4 70 6.1 15.1 90.8 ACTIVE INDEPENDENT 5 15 1.3 3.2 94.0 INACTIVE INDEPENDENT 6 28 2.4 6.0 100.0 . 683 59.5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 465 Missing cases 683 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PIDMOM6B Q31, PID your mother Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACTIVE DEMOCRAT 1 121 10.5 22.9 22.9 INACTIVE DEMOCRAT 2 136 11.8 25.7 48.6 ACTIVE REPUBLICAN 3 69 6.0 13.0 61.6 INACTIVE REPUBLICAN 4 133 11.6 25.1 86.8 ACTIVE INDEPENDENT 5 16 1.4 3.0 89.8 INACTIVE INDEPENDENT 6 54 4.7 10.2 100.0 . 619 53.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 529 Missing cases 619 PIDDAD6B Q31, PID your father Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent ACTIVE DEMOCRAT 1 121 10.5 23.4 23.4 INACTIVE DEMOCRAT 2 134 11.7 25.9 49.2 ACTIVE REPUBLICAN 3 82 7.1 15.8 65.1 INACTIVE REPUBLICAN 4 122 10.6 23.6 88.6 ACTIVE INDEPENDENT 5 19 1.7 3.7 92.3 INACTIVE INDEPENDENT 6 40 3.5 7.7 100.0 . 630 54.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 518 Missing cases 630 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SCHOOL6B Q32, formal schooling completed? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent GRADE SCHOOL OR LESS 1 5 .4 .9 .9 SOME HIGH SCHOOL 9-1 2 9 .8 1.6 2.5 GRADUATED HIGH SCHOO 3 68 5.9 12.2 14.7 SOME COLLEGE 13-15YR 4 110 9.6 19.7 34.3 COLLEGE GRADUATE 5 161 14.0 28.8 63.1 GRADUATE SCHOOL 6 206 17.9 36.9 100.0 . 589 51.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 559 Missing cases 589 AGE6B Q33, age Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 17-24 1 4 .3 .7 .7 25-29 2 7 .6 1.2 2.0 30-39 3 67 5.8 11.9 13.9 40-49 4 108 9.4 19.3 33.2 50-59 5 108 9.4 19.3 52.4 60-64 6 56 4.9 10.0 62.4 65 AND OLDER 7 211 18.4 37.6 100.0 . 587 51.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 561 Missing cases 587 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SEX6B Q34, sex Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent MALE 1 304 26.5 54.3 54.3 FEMALE 2 256 22.3 45.7 100.0 . 588 51.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 560 Missing cases 588 RACE6B Q35, race Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent WHITE 1 539 47.0 97.3 97.3 BLACK AFRICAN-AMERIC 2 9 .8 1.6 98.9 ASIAN-AMERICAN 3 1 .1 .2 99.1 HISPANIC-LATINO 4 2 .2 .4 99.5 NATIVE AMERICAN 5 3 .3 .5 100.0 . 592 51.6 Missing OTHER WRITE-IN 6 2 .2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 554 Missing cases 594 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INCOME6B Q36, approx family income before taxes Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent UNDER $20000 1 51 4.4 9.4 9.4 $20000-$39999 2 134 11.7 24.7 34.1 $40000-$59999 3 149 13.0 27.4 61.5 $60000-$79999 4 93 8.1 17.1 78.6 $80000-$99999 5 47 4.1 8.7 87.3 OVER $100000 6 69 6.0 12.7 100.0 . 605 52.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 543 Missing cases 605 REL6B Q37, religious preference Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent CATHOLIC 1 100 8.7 18.6 18.6 JEWISH 2 21 1.8 3.9 22.5 PROTESTANT (INCL. BA 3 354 30.8 65.9 88.5 NO RELIGIOUS PREFERE 4 62 5.4 11.5 100.0 . 587 51.1 Missing OTHER WRITE-IN 5 24 2.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 537 Missing cases 611 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - HOWREL6B Q38, How religious are you? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent VERY RELIGIOUS 1 130 11.3 23.5 23.5 FAIRLY RELIGIOUS 2 270 23.5 48.8 72.3 NOT VERY RELIGIOUS 3 92 8.0 16.6 89.0 NOT RELIGIOUS AT ALL 4 61 5.3 11.0 100.0 . 589 51.3 Missing NOT SURE 5 6 .5 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 553 Missing cases 595 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BNAG6B Q39, Are you a born-again Christian? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 134 11.7 24.1 24.1 NO 2 421 36.7 75.9 100.0 . 593 51.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 555 Missing cases 593 FUNDCH6B Q40, Are you a fundamentalist Christian? Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent YES 1 86 7.5 15.9 15.9 NO 2 455 39.6 84.1 100.0 . 607 52.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 541 Missing cases 607 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LCSOC6B Q41, political philosophy on social issu Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 66 5.7 12.1 12.1 LIBERAL 2 171 14.9 31.3 43.4 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 72 6.3 13.2 56.6 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 71 6.2 13.0 69.6 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 51 4.4 9.3 78.9 CONSERVATIVE 6 84 7.3 15.4 94.3 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 31 2.7 5.7 100.0 . 593 51.7 Missing OTHER WRITE-IN 8 6 .5 Missing NOT SURE 9 3 .3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 546 Missing cases 602 LCECON6B Q42, political philosophy on economic is Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent EXTREMELY LIBERAL 1 19 1.7 3.5 3.5 LIBERAL 2 107 9.3 19.7 23.2 SLIGHTLY LIBERAL 3 93 8.1 17.1 40.3 MIDDLE-OF-THE-ROAD 4 89 7.8 16.4 56.6 SLIGHTLY CONSERVATIV 5 78 6.8 14.3 71.0 CONSERVATIVE 6 126 11.0 23.2 94.1 EXTREMELY CONSERVATI 7 32 2.8 5.9 100.0 . 592 51.6 Missing OTHER WRITE-IN 8 7 .6 Missing NOT SURE 9 5 .4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 544 Missing cases 604 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MONTH6B Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 6 .5 1.1 1.1 2 39 3.4 6.9 7.9 3 18 1.6 3.2 11.1 4 3 .3 .5 11.6 10 2 .2 .4 12.0 11 481 41.9 84.8 96.8 12 18 1.6 3.2 100.0 . 581 50.6 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 567 Missing cases 581 DAY6B Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 0 1 .1 .2 .2 1 10 .9 1.8 2.0 2 3 .3 .5 2.5 3 7 .6 1.2 3.7 4 3 .3 .5 4.3 5 5 .4 .9 5.2 6 1 .1 .2 5.3 7 5 .4 .9 6.2 8 42 3.7 7.5 13.7 9 87 7.6 15.5 29.1 10 38 3.3 6.7 35.9 11 62 5.4 11.0 46.9 12 32 2.8 5.7 52.6 13 25 2.2 4.4 57.0 14 25 2.2 4.4 61.5 15 20 1.7 3.6 65.0 16 26 2.3 4.6 69.6 17 21 1.8 3.7 73.4 18 26 2.3 4.6 78.0 19 21 1.8 3.7 81.7 20 32 2.8 5.7 87.4 21 10 .9 1.8 89.2 22 20 1.7 3.6 92.7 23 11 1.0 2.0 94.7 24 6 .5 1.1 95.7 25 9 .8 1.6 97.3 26 5 .4 .9 98.2 27 3 .3 .5 98.8 28 5 .4 .9 99.6 30 1 .1 .2 99.8 31 1 .1 .2 100.0 . 585 51.0 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 563 Missing cases 585 YEAR6B Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 586 51.0 51.0 51.0 9 1 .1 .1 51.1 *6 1 .1 .1 51.2 0 1 .1 .1 51.3 2 1 .1 .1 51.4 35 1 .1 .1 51.5 67 1 .1 .1 51.6 69 2 .2 .2 51.7 86 2 .2 .2 51.9 95 2 .2 .2 52.1 96 483 42.1 42.1 94.2 97 66 5.7 5.7 99.9 99 1 .1 .1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1148 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RESPON6B Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent RESPONSE 1 571 49.7 100.0 100.0 . 577 50.3 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1148 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 571 Missing cases 577